Slashdot Mirror


The Interplanetary Internet

Roland Piquepaille writes "This article from SPACE.com about the Interplanetary Internet (IPN) is not science fiction. It is becoming a reality, Rich Gray reports. "The IPN would form a backbone connecting a series of hubs on or around planets, ships, and at other points in space. These hubs would provide high-capacity, high-availability Internet traffic over distances that could stretch up to hundreds of millions of miles." Gray adds that all the planets and satellites in our solar system have already Internet addresses and that NASA is already communicating with its earth-orbiting missions through its internal Deep Space Network. The rest of us will have to wait until at least 2005 when IPN-equipped satellites are launched. Check this column for more details. You also can read a previous Slashdot column on the same subject. "

270 comments

  1. think of the gamers man! by pilybaby · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the lag when playing HL2 with someone on Mars would be too much to take.

    1. Re:think of the gamers man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being an hpb would take on a whole new meaning

    2. Re:think of the gamers man! by arvindn · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, games are out, the round trip time being more half an hour to Mars. On a slightly more practical note, instant messaging won't be fun either.

      And the optimal packet size will probably be of the order of gigabytes!

      We'll need protocols that absolutely minimize the number of rounds over all other considerations.

      And I wonder if your downloads will be slightly slower or faster depending on the red shift or blue shift of the server :-)

    3. Re:think of the gamers man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, with the sort of timescales we're talking about here, you'd probably be playing Duke Nukem Forever.

    4. Re:think of the gamers man! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      And don't forget your P2P (which could be redubbed as Planet-to-Planet) networks. Your search for illicit Saturnian pr0n could take days...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:think of the gamers man! by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      Introducing... delayed messaging!

    6. Re:think of the gamers man! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 0
      We'll need protocols that absolutely minimize the number of rounds over all other considerations.
      What, like UUCP?
    7. Re:think of the gamers man! by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but Duke Nuken Forever will have advanced AI features, that you train by playing the single player game. When you want to play multiplayer, you just upload your trained AI to the opponent's machine, and it runs locally on his computer! 0 ping!

    8. Re:think of the gamers man! by Gossy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Introducing... delayed messaging!

      I think it's been around for a while. We call them letters.

    9. Re:think of the gamers man! by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny
      Obligatory Futurama Quote:
      That's why scientists increased the speed of light in 2208!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:think of the gamers man! by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but UDP will probably be popular.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    11. Re:think of the gamers man! by Cirrius · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Mars and games and the IPN, look at the top text line of http://www.ua-corp.com , guess the tech support sucks in the future too

    12. Re:think of the gamers man! by diverman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it will allow for those long-thinking chess players the time they seem to enjoy taking per move. :)

      -Alex

    13. Re:think of the gamers man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      server:/# ping sojurner.nasa.mars.org
      PING sojurner.nasa.mars.org (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
      64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=40 min
      64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=40 min
      --- localhost ping statistics ---
      2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max = 40/40/40 min

    14. Re:think of the gamers man! by RayOfLight · · Score: 1

      Introducing... delayed messaging!

      I think it's been around for a while. We call them letters.


      ... or emails.

    15. Re:think of the gamers man! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That has to be the single most pathetic post attempt I've ever seen... And I've been reading slashdot for years.

      So, you replace "localhost" on the command-line, and the first instance of it in the output, but forgot the last time it is mentioned "--- localhost ping statistics ---". You also didn't even bother to change the IP addresses to anything sane... 127.0.0.1... That's just sad.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:think of the gamers man! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty good idea. The game needs to be designed around it, but a serious strategy based game with a locally run tactics AI could be an interesting idea, and training you own tactics commander to upload to the opponent's site...and, of course, conversely. You could be the strategic commander, with tactical information on one theater of the game...

      It would be a different *kind* of game, but it might be quite interesting.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:think of the gamers man! by krenshala · · Score: 1

      There is a really good game now that could be played over the IPN ... Laser Squad: Nemesis. Its a ... Real Time, Turn Based, PBeM tactical sim ... it kicks ass! You can do turns at your own pace, and each turn takes 10 seconds of 'real' time in the game. Perfect for when your opponent is in a differnent timezone ... on a different planet. ;)

      (for that that are interested, check here ... made by the original X-Com creators)

      --

      krenshala

    18. Re:think of the gamers man! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Diplomacy (the Avalon Hill game) would also work really well.
      We play it now with typically three days per turn. See for
      example www.diplom.org

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  2. I have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    all the planets and satellites in our solar system have already Internet addresses

    So, whats the internet address for Uranus? http://ipn.myhomepage.ass ? or, .anus?

    1. Re:I have to ask... by trikberg · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is the infamous .cx?

      No, I won't post a link.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    2. Re:I have to ask... by Woy · · Score: 1

      For crying out loud, the man has conquered an entire TLD!

      Give him some credit...

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    3. Re:I have to ask... by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      In order to avoid such jokes as that one, the planet's name was changed to Urectum.

      --Futurama

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  3. interplanetary travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm...shouldn't we worry about interplanetary TRAVEL first?

    1. Re:interplanetary travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well that would make too much sense now, wouldn't it?

      Personally I can't wait for the interplanetary internet. Nothing would thrill me more than a 4 hour ping time.

    2. Re:interplanetary travel by erosen03 · · Score: 1

      nah, i'm sure that nasa is planning to setup web cams at various points of interest in space. of course they need ip addresses for 'em.

    3. Re:interplanetary travel by An+Anonymous+Cow · · Score: 1

      Naw, we can scout around for the planets that have alien babes first. Interplanetary porn!

      --

      -
      Moooo!!!

    4. Re:interplanetary travel by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      We'll probably have to set up a differential TTL system for IPs associated with Off-planet resources.

      Imagine posting the URL to Jupiter's first web-cam on slashdot. A little over an hour after you click the link, you find out it's been down for 30 minutes.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    5. Re:interplanetary travel by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > shouldn't we worry about interplanetary TRAVEL first?

      Not necessarily. If we just drop a large variety of internet-connected hardware (hopefully mobile & wireless) onto a planet (before we get there in person) individuals can learn a whole lot and do their own observing and find all sorts of interesting things. Let's say you like looking at stars through your 50x telescope. Now imagine being able to use the Hubble (well, maybe one that works better) to look at the "same things."

      I realize that this equipment would not be available to the public to control, but it's the thought that counts (when doesn't it).

    6. Re:interplanetary travel by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      No! I mean seriously would you go some place that has no internet access for an extended stay? Life without slashdot, just because you have posted on this site suggests to me that you need your slashdot, is just un-thinkable. Yes it will be an extended stay for the time and expense traveling to another planet you'd better be staying a few months.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  4. TCP/IP by ergonal · · Score: 1

    TCP is a "best effort" delivery protocol, and that's all you could hope for when latency could span minutes at a time.

    1. Re:TCP/IP by bunyip · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since RFC 1149 clearly works, then a few minutes of interplanetary delay shouldn't be too much of a problem.

    2. Re:TCP/IP by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Since that was one single packet, with a human to monitor every aspect, I don't think that's a good example.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:TCP/IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TCP is a "best effort" delivery protocol

      I guess that would be IP or perhaps UDP.. and not TCP.
      Not that anyone knows the difference ;-)

  5. Store and forward.. by wfberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's with this newfangled internet? Don't they have UUCP?

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:Store and forward.. by Tom · · Score: 1
      What's with this newfangled internet? Don't they have UUCP?

      Actually, had you read the article:
      The IPN would work more like e-mail, where information would be stored and forwarded to any hub on the system.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Store and forward.. by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

      The internet is that thing your e-mail goes over after you send it to your ISP via UUCP... :-)

      Seriously though, batch networking is exactly what is needed for interplanetary networks. UUCP would fit the bill pretty well. Sure, they can hack TCP/IP to support a store-and-forward queue, but it's still a hack.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Store and forward.. by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      I imagine caching proxies will probably be popular.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    4. Re:Store and forward.. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      With this kind of a delay, I don't think an inter-planetary WWW is going to even be possible. Large file-based communications would be decent.

      The anecdote about the bandwidth and delay of a vehicle full of data storage is quite right. This will be the same kind of delay, with presumably the same bandwidth.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Store and forward.. by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      A proxy pair could manage a decent system. Each basically would have to spider along pages, compress the huge cache, and send it every x hours. Or, a site could perform a "change stream" to off-planet proxies for fastest-possible updating.

      Having no engineering experience, I wonder if branch prediction and other forecasting technologies would be helpful in inter-planetary communication. After all, a CPU is desperately trying to figure out what it needs for the future to avoid the painful delays of a cache miss. That seems similar to computing that takes place over long distances.

      Of course, the difference between what a program wants and what a user wants are significant.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    6. Re:Store and forward.. by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Woohooo, an interplanetary Fidonet. Now those were the days.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    7. Re:Store and forward.. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      UUCP wouldn't work. You need something with massive error detection/correction capabilities.

      Actually, none of the current protocols would be ideal, and the one that's ideal for the moon, probably wouldn't work to anywhere else in the solar system. For most of the solar system you need something that identifies each block, and allows you to request it again. It might even be worthwhile to enable any single missing block to be reconstructed from the blocks on either side of it... this partially depends on situational details. (How long can the data be left on the spool? Long enough to allow a request for retransmission to be received? Twice? What are the costs of a lost packet? Etc.)

      OTOH, you certainly don't want to wait around for an acknowledgement that the packet was received.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:Store and forward.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      OTOH, you certainly don't want to wait around for an acknowledgement that the packet was received.


      TCP Window == 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999 ;-)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Store and forward.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, UUCP has a selection of transport protocols beneath its store-and-forward remote job entry system.
      Error correction would be done at the link layer, and UUCP can ride atop of that. It would be better than standard Internet protocols.

    10. Re:Store and forward.. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You could use UUCP as the basis, and implement the protocol on top of it, but as I understand things UUCP doesn't itself contain any checks that any particular packet was even delivered. Or any packet serialization. etc.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. Great by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "To boldly Slashdot where nobody has Slashdotted before."

    While network infrastructure will be working at lower levels, there will of course never be any kind of interactivity - expect new legal fun and games as the need to cache and bulk send stuff to local mirrors collides with steadily more draconian IP laws.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:GREAT by theflea · · Score: 2, Funny

      However, as deep space hacking targets get farther away, high latency will not provide hackers with immediate gratification. Also, authorities can prosecute the 15-year-old as an adult! (due to 3 year delivery time for his malicious payload)

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ob. fingering Uranus joke.

    3. Re:GREAT by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about DDOS attacks to space probes, worry about DDOS attacks coming from space probes...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what we need is some fifteen-year-old DDoS-ing the Sun.

    5. Re:Great by prmths · · Score: 2, Funny

      May 5, 2023:

      And here's a quote from 'dark lord seth' from 20 years ago:
      "Like we do not already have a shortage of IP adresses for one planet already. Screw IPv6, we need IPv8 now instead to deal with this! 1,3407807929942597099574024998206e+154 IP adresses ought to be enough for ever space ship, space station and coffee machine in the future!"

      little did he know that by the year 2015, everything manufactured would be made of net-connected nano-machines; each with its own address and automatically replaces itself as it wears out resulting to our unbreakable devices we all know and love today.

    6. Re:Great by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Actually a 256-bit address header is probably sufficient - it's nearly enough to assign an IP per atom in the universe. Of course, you may decide you need to address things on a quantum level, so best to go to a 272-bit header and be done with it.

      A 512-bit header is just massive overkill... unless, of course, you're talking about interfacing between parallel universes.

    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1,3407807929942597099574024998206e+154 should be enough for anyone.

    8. Re:GREAT by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's all we need, is some fifteen-year-old DDoS-ing the Hubble.

      Why stop there? Insert a phoney image of the Vigina Nebula. Oh wait, they already did that.

    9. Re:Great by a302b · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... This got me thinking.

      Probably what webmasters will do if they want to restrict caches and robots, but if they want to allow browsing across the planets, is simply but a line or so in their robots.txt to do this. However, then there is a problem with banks and other secure sites. I don't know. It looks like the whole structure/protocol will have to be recreated from scratch.

      Does anyone have any ideas how one could use secure/dynamic content without an immense lag, or caching problems? Creating a special "secure cache" might be one possibility.

      However, my guess is that sites which want security, etc, will simply host a mirror themselves on the various planets.

      Just a couple of musings..

      --
      Unity in Diversity
    10. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you do it atomically. You put together your entire request and bundle it up. When it gets there after however many timeouts and transmissions, your instructions get executed.

      We're relatively spoiled since we have short round-trip times with the computers on the other end. Assume that's no longer possible, and things become very different.

      You would essentially need to run the bank's client software on your own machine. It would take your commands and fire it off in batches. Updates would be received in a similar fashion. It would just a lot like the old days here on Earth before everyone decided to plug into the new fangled Internet thing.

  7. Hm. by Some+Woman · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's just somethin odd about all other planets already having internet addresses. Is it just one per planet, or does each Martian get its own? I mean, one for an entire planet just doesn't seem fair, now does it?

    --
    My dingo ate your honor student.
    1. Re:Hm. by rnturn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ``I mean, one for an entire planet just doesn't seem fair, now does it?''

      They'll just have to rely on NAT like the rest of us do.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Hm. by clarkcox3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They'll just have to rely on NAT like the rest of us do.
      That actually makes a lot of sense, have a huge router per planet, with NAT, that batches the outgoing TCP/IP packets into large (i.e. multi-gigabyte) packets, which are split back into their TCP/IP packets at the receiving end on some other planet. That way, the effects of latencies measured in hours on the actual throughput could be minimized.
      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    3. Re:Hm. by pilybaby · · Score: 1

      Subdomains!

      .mod.mer
      .nhs.ven
      .bushsplanet.eth
      .info.mar
      .org.jup
      .gov.sat
      .sex.anus
      .car.nep
      .lone.plo

    4. Re:Hm. by anothy · · Score: 1

      maybe by the time the IPN sats get up, we'll start seeing IPv6 around?

      nah, who'm i kidding. we'll hvae to come up with something else.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    5. Re:Hm. by Imperator · · Score: 1
      I mean, one for an entire planet just doesn't seem fair, now does it?
      They'll get by fine if they use IPv6.
      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    6. Re:Hm. by liquidsin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if Mars bans NAT like Michigan did?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    7. Re:Hm. by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I figure by the time they really need it, they'll have tons of IP6 addresses to make use of.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    8. Re:Hm. by amber_lux · · Score: 1

      There's just somethin odd about all other planets already having internet addresses.

      It means that spammers can be cut off with one IP address.

      Oops, the spam is not coming from there, it is going there. They might need a slightly different solution.

      Wind under Thy Wings

      Amber

      --

      Suppose you did.
      Suppose you did not.

    9. Re:Hm. by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      thats not NAT, that's tunnelling.

  8. GREAT by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's all we need, is some fifteen-year-old DDoS-ing the Hubble.

    --
    evil adrian
  9. yeah by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because we have 3 probes and a Spacestation that need internet access, right?

    How about we focus on getting things out into space first, then we worry about being able to get pr0n to them?

    1. Re:yeah by multi+io · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How about we focus on getting things out into space first, then we worry about being able to get pr0n to them?

      Well, since most geeks don't build spacecrafts, and most space technicians don't design network protocols, we might as well work in parallel and do all at once :).

    2. Re:yeah by HomerNet · · Score: 1

      Too right!

      When there's a point to "interplanetary Internet," I'll be more interested. Until then, these stories are a big fat yawn.

      --
      I have no tag line
    3. Re:yeah by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope - you are completely wrong - it's not about gettin pr0n TO space but FROM space ;-)

    4. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pervert!

    5. Re:yeah by prmths · · Score: 1

      the scary part is... i'm sure there's a porn czar out there that already has the cash ready to start up an orbital live sex cam...
      i mean hell .. didnt one of those boy bands go into space already?

    6. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about we focus on getting things out into space first, then we worry about being able to get pr0n to them?

      I think the astronauts that spend months on the ISS would beg to differ with you on that.

    7. Re:yeah by pilybaby · · Score: 1

      jism in 0-G I don't fancy cleaning that up! "oh man! Last nights 'thought' is all over the navigation system now".

    8. Re:yeah by Cerrian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's more than just sharing inter-planetary pr0n.

      The communication system is a key driving factor to any spacecraft design. This is especially true for any spacecrafts not orbiting around Earth.

      The communications system drives:
      - power requirements
      - size of solar arrays
      - # of batteries
      - # of ground stations
      - mission operations
      - level of autonomy
      - antenna pointing accuracy
      - quality and quantity of scientific data
      and much more...

      In short, the comm system is a key factor in mission risk, cost, and spacecraft design. It sounds like IPN is trying to establish a permanent communication network in our solar system by placing communication relay satellites at various locations in the solar system.

      If they are successful, then future interplanetary spacecrafts will no longer be required to "phone home" directly (i.e. have line of sight). Instead, those spacecrafts would need to only transmit to the nearest relay satellite. Therefore, interplanetary spacecrafts could be designed with less complexity, cost, and risk while benefitting from constant command and control access, higher data rates, and greater scientific data returns.

      In regards to the 3 probes and spacestation issue: if we look farther ahead, we'll see that there are a number of interplanetary probes, vehicles and spacecrafts that will be launched within the next decade. Most notably the New Horizons mission (Pluto), the twin Mars rovers, and the Next Generation Telescope (at Earth-Sun L2 poing?). All 3 of those missions would benifit greatly by having their communications architecture simplified.

    9. Re:yeah by BDew · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, New Horizons and the Mars Rovers are too far along for changing the comms system. Heck, the MERs are going to launch in a month or so and are already at the Cape. JWST (yes, at L2) is still in design, so that's a possibility.

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    10. Re:yeah by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I think I'll run out right now and grab the domain name LiveZeroGsex.com! Only $14.95 per minute! Choose from 32 camera angles! Full zoom capability!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    11. Re:yeah by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      How about we focus on getting things out into space first, then we worry about being able to get pr0n to them?

      Why else would they need Internet access if it wasn't to view pornography? I'm sure they could find a much more efficient way to transmit telemetry, messages, and video than the Internet you know. Porn on the other hand... It's harder to justify to the tax payers why the astronauts need a high speed porn network uplink. If you say it's for Internet access then they will usually buy it.

  10. Does this mean... by Bvardi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wben I tell the users in my office that their email vanished "somewhere into outer space" I might actually be telling the truth?

    Seems like both a forward-looking and very practical idea - I personally hope to see manned stations/colonies/etc within various places in the solar system in my lifetime and it might be handy to have the ability to communicate with those places.

    Mind you the scary bit would be tracking down interplanetary spammers! (The nigerian scam could become the martian scam!)

    1. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that I'll be getting pr0n spam from Planet Spaceball? Imagine this in a subject line from a message sent from an open relay orbiting Rigel: President Skroob getting great helmet!

  11. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's what we should be spending money on. There are so few needy causes here on terra firma.

  12. Squatters by Steve1952 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bad news! Most of the planetary sites are occupied by squatters. For example, some snack food company is sitting on mars.com...

    1. Re:Squatters by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the Red Planet, Mars bars eat you. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Squatters by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      No problem, we'll just rename the planet to...

      Snickers!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:Squatters by Alsee · · Score: 1

      For example, some snack food company is sitting on mars.com...

      You think that's bad?
      What about some snack food company sitting on uranus.com?

      Dark chocolate that melts in your mouth. Chewy nougat with chunks of peanuts inside. Creamy Rich Caramel. Peanutbutter swirl. Suprise liquid center!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  13. Times and firewalls by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless something new is discovered, times for anything beyond moon will be high, at least, higher than most would wait. And, well, you know... most firewalls will reject martian packets.

    1. Re:Times and firewalls by Max+von+H. · · Score: 4, Funny

      We don't need no stinkin' firewall. We got the Asteroid Belt, your packets will be lost in the collisions...

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  14. Why not... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Use fibre? No need to keep satellite antennae aligned!

    I'll post something serious about the IPN when it has a practical use for the average techie.

  15. But... by JessLeah · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...what will the ping times to Mars be? ;)

    1. Re:But... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      That depends entirely upon the location of Mars with respect to the Earth, the number of hops in between, the prevalent solar wind, etc.

      Ask your astrophysics professor :)

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About your antiRedmond shop running Windows.
      Its out of your control -- really?
      Use another service provider -- stop being
      a hypocrite.

    3. Re:But... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      Sure. Name one. My email address is jb (AT) twu )))DOT((( net. Mail me with a suggestion.

    4. Re:But... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

      Hehehe... I like how you spam proofed your email in the post even though it's plainly posted beside your userid in the /. message header.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, jb@twu.net, if you bother to look around, you will find at least half a dozen within 5 minutes.

      You might want to try searching the Internet - you have heard of that, right?

      *sigh*

    6. Re:But... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's nice, why don't you try to get spammers to spam me. That's a great way to get someone to take your advice.

      Wake up and smell the Clue.

  16. IPv6? by mirabilos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Do these damn US-Americans who still own most of
    the free IPv4 addresses at least use IPv6-only
    connectivity to those satelites, or are they using
    up IPv4 addresses we in Europe or those over there
    in Asia could need better?

    Just wondering.

    --
    My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
    1. Re:IPv6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -> "Do these damn US-Americans"

      And we're supposed to take a post that starts with this kind of crap seriously? I can't believe it was modded up.

    2. Re:IPv6? by mirabilos · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You can guess that I'm fairly anti-american, yes.
      And this is serious.

      --
      My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
  17. Uranus by Max+von+H. · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think the White House's new domain should be uranus.gov as to limit the lag when the cowboys in charge are looking for their heads...

    Cheers,
    max

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    1. Re:Uranus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow. A Uranus joke. Gee, do you know any jokes about farts?

      And a mindless "Bush is so dumb" comment. The originality is just sizzling today!

      You might want to go a bit further out to neptune.org or pluto.com. You might find a life there. Oh no! A "get a life" comeback! We're all just flaming with clever retorts today!

  18. great, now we'll never have a fair game! by niall111 · · Score: 1

    all the clans we play against will move to jupiter and get their home server there, just for the ping rapage.

  19. Nip it in the bud by redtail1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    You also can read a previous Slashdot column on the same subject."

    Well, that's one way to prevent 40 people from submitting "repeat post" comments...

  20. It's not slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just that the latency from here and uranus is about three hours!

    1. Re:It's not slashdotted. by scsirob · · Score: 1

      ..Except for /. subscribers, they get there an hour early.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    2. Re:It's not slashdotted. by lynnroth · · Score: 1

      I'd subscibe if Faster-Than-Light travel was included....

    3. Re:It's not slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to reduce the latency to uranus you need to eat more leafy greens and other foods containing fibre.

  21. I've Said It Before And I'll Say It Again... by PipianJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    [luser@somebox luser]$ ping -c 4 www.pathfinder.mars
    Pinging www.pathfinder.mars [178.223.52.43] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678674ms TTL=53
    Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679146ms TTL=53
    Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678608ms TTL=53
    Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679568ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 178.223.52.43:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 114ms
    That's nearly 44 minutes round trip for light, and that's only to Mars at opposition. Imagine how long it is to Pluto at opposition. What is it that they say? It was 20-30 hours round-trip to contact Pioneer 10?
    1. Re:I've Said It Before And I'll Say It Again... by aaribaud · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678674ms TTL=53
      >Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679146ms TTL=53
      >Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678608ms TTL=53
      >Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679568ms TTL=53
      >
      >Ping statistics for 178.223.52.43:
      >Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
      >Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
      >Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 114ms

      Time to patch that ping utility of yours. It uses earth-relative time when measuring individual packet routnd-trip, but packet-relative time for the stats line.

      And please make the patch GPL (Got Past Lightspeed).

    2. Re:I've Said It Before And I'll Say It Again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678674ms TTL=53
      Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679146ms TTL=53
      Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2678608ms TTL=53
      Reply from 178.223.52.43: bytes=32 time=2679568ms TTL=53

      Ping statistics for 178.223.52.43:
      Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
      Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
      Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 183ms, Average = 114ms


      Still, somehow you managed to get a pretty decent average ping. Maybe there's hope for CS players on Mars after all?
    3. Re:I've Said It Before And I'll Say It Again... by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      ping pathfinder.probe

      Pinging pathfinder.probe [178.223.52.43] with 32 bytes of data:
      Error: Path not found.


      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  22. DoS by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the Denial of Satalite attacks.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  23. Hack the Planet!! by override11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hehe, Takes on a whole new meaning now, eh?

    Hrmm, if I ping flood the north pole will I cause global flooding? Hrmm, wonder if I can just chmod the boarders to keep terrorists out.. *grin*

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
    1. Re:Hack the Planet!! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I know you! You're the kid that hangs out at Best Buy, trying to get the computers to dial-up to the internet, even though there's obviously no phone-line connected.

      Any relation to the Judge that thought Mitnick was going to launch nukes if he had access to a typewritter?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  24. Slashdot Bandwidth Management by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    It was very polite of the Slashdot editors to select a story with links which avoid slashdotting Mars.

  25. Well, ipv4 on Linux isn't going to make it... by joeytsai · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c:
    /* Increase the timeout each time we retransmit. Note that
    * we do not increase the rtt estimate. rto is initialized
    * from rtt, but increases here. Jacobson (SIGCOMM 88) suggests
    * that doubling rto each time is the least we can get away with.
    * In KA9Q, Karn uses this for the first few times, and then
    * goes to quadratic. netBSD doubles, but only goes up to *64,
    * and clamps at 1 to 64 sec afterwards. Note that 120 sec is
    * defined in the protocol as the maximum possible RTT. I guess
    * we'll have to use something other than TCP to talk to the
    * University of Mars.
    *
    * PAWS allows us longer timeouts and large windows, so once
    * implemented ftp to mars will work nicely. We will have to fix
    * the 120 second clamps though!
    */
    --
    http://www.talknerdy.org
    1. Re:Well, ipv4 on Linux isn't going to make it... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Hehe... You gotta love geeks who starts thinking of problems with extraterrestrial FTP's when defining upper limits... and seriously suggesting solutions to them. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. Hmmm... by jgerman · · Score: 1

    I imagine we should start calling the "Ansible" soon.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      But those philotes are so hard to track down.

      It strikes me as odd that we discovered technology that lead to the ansibles, when the Formics would have needed no communication devices.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philotes are just some new-age bullshit... the Ansible is completely explained by the simultaneity theory, although it's been a while since I read The Dispossessed so I can't remember the details...

  27. Re:TCP/IP - Linux Kernel not ready!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    from ip.c

    /*
    * Increase the timeout each time we retransmit. Note that
    * we do not increase the rtt estimate. rto is initialized
    * from rtt, but increases here. Jacobson (SIGCOMM 88) suggests
    * that doubling rto each time is the least we can get away with.
    * In KA9Q, Karn uses this for the first few times, and then
    * goes to quadratic. netBSD doubles, but only goes up to *64,
    * and clamps at 1 to 64 sec afterwards. Note that 120 sec is
    * defined in the protocol as the maximum possible RTT. I guess
    * we'll have to use something other than TCP to talk to the
    * University of Mars.
    */
  28. More info on the JPL site by ControlFreal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is actually a long-term project which, in 2015 (probably 2030 in reality ;) boasts a downlink of several Tbits per day to earth.

    Check out the info here.

    --
    Support a Europe-related section on Slashdot!
    1. Re:More info on the JPL site by zentigger · · Score: 1

      I guess if we were transmitting to Mars they would definitely be Terra bits, but if you were sending from the moon would you have Luna Bits?

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

  29. We use of IPv4 by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    We are of using the connetivity of IPv4 which you in Europe and them over there in Asia need better.

  30. Interplanetary chat rooms: patience required! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny
    [BigDuud has entered chat room #marssex]

    BigDuud: Anyone here?
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: Just me it seems.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: Wassup! I'm at Tycho City, Moon. Where you at?
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: Utopia Planita base, Mars.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: Cool! Are you nekkid?
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: Yes, but only under my spacesuit.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: Bummer.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: Yeah. We had a failure in the Windows2150 installation, and it caused a pressure imbalance that blew out the mail seals. I was in the shower when it happened. I'm all wet and soapy in here.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: How long before it's fixed?
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: Who knows? They admins are downloading the patch from the Redmond Arcology, but it's suposedly 50 billion terabytes for the copyright notice alone.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: Bummer.
    (20 minutes pass)
    BarsoomGirl: This suit has a seismic vibrator, though. ;-)
    (20 minutes pass)
    BigDuud: Wicked! So, do you have big barsooms?

    [Connection terminated. Link eclipsed by Phobos.]

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Interplanetary chat rooms: patience required! by Xformer · · Score: 1

      Next on the list... subspace radio!
      (shame on you if you don't get it)

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    2. Re:Interplanetary chat rooms: patience required! by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      You may be joking, but back in the "good" old days, there was a period of time when internet usage went up so quickly that our IRC network was totally saturated... we were getting multi-minute lag frequently, and so we eventually had to resort to DCC Chats.
      I was putting up with multiple minute pings for a loong time before I found out about DCC...
      So all you whiners complaining about 300 millisecond pings on UT, shut the fuck up :P

    3. Re:Interplanetary chat rooms: patience required! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Next on the list... subspace radio! (shame on you if you don't get it)

      Pffft! Shame on *you* for not already having it!

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  31. Interplanetary Porn by bfischer · · Score: 1

    How long til we see Venusian porn?

    1. Re:Interplanetary Porn by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      How long before we see a Slashdot post: "Warning parent post's venus link is really goatse.uranus"?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Interplanetary Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those links are down. Looks like we slashdotted the TLD names servers trying to resolve those domains.

  32. Intergalatic Slashdotting by lord_ashaman · · Score: 1

    Newsflash

    Not content with destroying web-servers, on the planet Earth, the Slashdot Effect has destroyed hundreds of servers, including one all the way up your anus.

  33. Lots of Great uses by flogger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For science. Look at our data recording of various solar bodies. We have to send up a satelite to orbit the planet, say Neptune. This satelite takes its readings and can only report back to earth when there is direct lne of site. With Neptune, this doesn't happen that often. If there were a "hub" system of Interplanetary TCP/IP set up, this satelite on Neptune could send the info via Jupiter --> Mars --> Venus -->Earth.
    Now once these hubs are set up, Communications would not rely on Line of site; interplanetory travel could "talk" with mission control from anywhere on the journey.
    Some Sci-Fi:
    • Traverse 12:Mission Control, Commander Meichiko just gave birth to a fine son, Akira. ... There were some complications. Meickiko's Uterus ruptures when the placenta detatched. She's now stable. What do you reccomend?
    • Mission Control: Traverse 12. We read you. Congradulations. We are sending you the data from Commanders Meichiko's Reproductive files. From this you should be able to print out a new uterus on your HP BioJet 9800.
    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:Lots of Great uses by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      Even when you no longer need line of sight, there's still a rather large amount of time that needs to take place for the signal to travel from origin to destination.

      Remote medical treatment won't be possible in the situation you describe because of this time, using current conventional methods. Now, if Arthur Clarke's 'The Light of Other Days' comes to pass, there won't be any trouble whatsoever because a hole will just be opened up on both ends and then we've got instantaneous transmissions.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:Lots of Great uses by kipsate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neptune and Earth are in direct line of sight for the large majority of the time. Imagine: only when the sun, a Neptune moon or a planet happens to be in the way, the line of sight is blocked. Does not happen that much.

      Your suggestion of sending the signal through Jupiter - Mars - "Venus" (useless as it is closer to the sun than Earth) to Earth will not work, since planets rotate around the sun and will almost never be lined up such that they can be effectively used as communication hubs.

      --
      My karma ran over your dogma
    3. Re:Lots of Great uses by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yeah. What you need to use is the Venus Equilateral Relay Station.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Lots of Great uses by luna69 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if anyone was going to make note of the fact that "line of sight" is pretty much the norm, not the anomaly, with regard to planets.

      That being said, and even in light of the fact that planets arerarely "lined up" to facilitate bouncing messages linearly between several planets, I do think that there are good reasons to consider "IP-in-space" implemenatations.

      Most notably, think about a scale in between our own terrestrial, ground-based networks and the proposed interplanetary network above - think about how useful an array of communications relay sats orbiting Mars would be, for instance. In the case of Mars, line-of-sight is obstructed for a rover on the ground for about half of every Martian day, and the ability to beam real-time data to an orbiting sat directly, and allow that sat and its companions to worry about how to get the data to Earth simplifies things for the rover, and makes it unnecessary for the rover to have a high-gain antenna, etc.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  34. HUH? by Parsa · · Score: 4, Funny

    These uninhabited planets are getting high speed backbones? I can't get anything more than dial up where I live!

    J

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
    1. Re:HUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As always it comes down to the last mile.

    2. Re:HUH? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Move to Mars.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    3. Re:HUH? by ManitobaMoose · · Score: 0

      buy a Constrictor and get off Zaonce at once!

  35. Who is really communicating here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    us, or the servers?

  36. The only problem.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    .. will be with those killer roaming charges on Grand Tour missions.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  37. Spam Law by rf0 · · Score: 1

    I can just see it now. Sitting on Pluto minding my own business then I see I've got mail saying "Important Information about your Cess Pit" . Means we are going to come up with a totally new set of laws for spam and tele-marketers

    Rus

  38. Finally someone noticed by jaymzter · · Score: 1

    One thing Sci-Fi writers have left out when talking about spending prolonged periods in space has been access to good pr0n. Of course, for that they need newsgroup access!

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  39. How much SPAM... by vertaxis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, how much SPAM will be needed to take out the system?

    Ideally, it may be a good idea to tightly regulate what gets on that network. Filter out the Spam, popups, and various other ads that would eat up the bandwidth

    --
    Fear is the enemy; the one true enemy. {Sun Tzu-The Art of War}
  40. Alien Teenage Wardriving by altek · · Score: 1

    Now all the young inhabitants of M45S3 will be war-flying to hijack our intergalactic internet connections.

    Maybe we should use something a little better than WEP...

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  41. Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by splerdu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps with IP addresses being allocated to far remote locations the government will allocate more funding to quantum research?

    Traditional methods of broadcast certainly won't be very useful over distances where light will take minutes to travel. Unless we make rapid advances and make quantum teleportation of electronic data possible, the email of today may become the snailmail of future generations.

    1. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by atomicdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately even the transmission of information by quantum teleportation is limited by the speed of light. Unless you are thinking of quantum tunneling which allows stuff to go faster than light, but kind of needs a solid barrier between the source and destination. There are some alternates, but they would probably require the same amount technological as warp drive.

    2. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      This stuff about quantum teleportation allowing particles to travel faster than light, but unable to carry information faster than light confuses me to know end. If the particle arrives at all, why couldn't that be the information in itself. Sort of like morse code...it's either there or its not. Although as I understand it, it could be there and not there at the same time.

      Anyone care to explain why quantum teleportation is unable to carry information?

    3. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

      Well... we can go around the problem.

      If we created a powerful enough gravity field (black hole, at a small distance from earth.. or on earth if we can control it) we could bend space time temporarily at will and have a part of mars and earth coexist. Then pass packets through.... better yet, we could just walk through and hand over the message in person.

      Oh who am I kidding... I ICQ my roomates across the hall for gods sake!

      --Zuchini

    4. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by atomicdragon · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, most methods of quantum teleportation are done with quantum entanglement of two particles, meaning if you do something to one, it instantly affects the other one, even if they are separated by huge distances. So you can manipulate one particle at the source and then a person at the destination can see the changes in the other particle. The only problem, is by observing the particle at the destination, the state of both particles is changed (the whole uncertainty principle thing). So you have to send a signal, limited by the speed of light, that they have changed the source particles so it is safe to observe the destination particles.

      Even with a quantum mechanics background, the one thing I don't get is why not have a lot of these particles and observe one after another waiting for a change. A lot would be wasted, but I would imagine with error correction and such, you could get useful information by observing changes. May be I will go bug some the people running the quantum teleportation experiments where I work.

      There are several different schemes for quantum teleportation with reasons similar to the above that requires some light speed transmission to be made before any teleportation can be done. For a general introduction to quantum teleportation, I would recommend the Scientific American article that was one the cover of their April 2000 issue. I checked the website and I don't think this article is available on the web from sciam.com, so you would have to find a dead-tree copy.

    5. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by RedCard · · Score: 1

      Even with a quantum mechanics background, the one thing I don't get is why not have a lot of these particles and observe one after another waiting for a change. A lot would be wasted, but I would imagine with error correction and such, you could get useful information by observing changes.

      I sorry if this is about to come off as impolite, but I want to put this to bed once and for all. Every single stinking time that quantum teleportation comes up we hear some innately wrong theories about how to send info faster than light.

      I strongly doubt that you have a "quantum mechanics background" if you don't get why this doesn't work.

      Let's say I entangle two particles.

      Anything I do to one affects the other. You've got that right. However, the act of observing the system changes the system. There is absolutely no way whatsoever to "observe one after another and wait for a change". By observing you have changed the system and thus collapsed the quantum states.

      YOU CANNOT OBSERVE A CHANGE WITHOUT CHANGING THE SYSTEM.

      Therefore, no information can be sent this way.

      And because no information can be sent, then by definition no amount of error correction can help you solve the problem.

      Period.

    6. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by atomicdragon · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean observe a single particle several times, but have millions of pairs of entangled particles and observe the first particle, then the second, and the third and so on. I was thinking of a variation of the teleportation done with Bell states.

      But I do agree with what you said. Of course it doesn't work since FTL communication is not possible without something drastic like warping space. But there is a difference between knowing the answer and knowing exactly why that answer is true (like say 42). I haven't had the time to play with the math of the system I was think about, especially since I have now been awake for almost 36 hours working on other things(yeah there are better things to do than reading slashdot, but a break every so often helps).

      Lets not forget all of that science fiction that is polluting my intuition that things should be different they are, since we would all want FTL communication.

    7. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean observe a single particle several times, but have millions of pairs of entangled particles and observe the first particle, then the second, and the third and so on.

      That doesn't work because there is no visible change to detect. Every particle you "observe" will give you a random answer. You just get a random stream of zeros and ones. There is no way to know that your observation was affected by someone else's observation until you recieve a slower-than-light message saying what the other person observed.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Quantum Teleportation as a solution? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      This stuff about quantum teleportation allowing particles to travel faster than light, but unable to carry information faster than light confuses me to know end... Anyone care to explain why quantum teleportation is unable to carry information?

      Because quantum teleportation does NOT allow particles to travel faster than light.

      You destroy the original particle. You send a slower-than-light signal. You recreate the particle at the destination.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  42. IP laws? by mattkime · · Score: 2, Funny

    how can other plants get internet if thy don't have IP laws yet?

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    1. Re:IP laws? by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      how can other plants get internet if thy don't have IP laws yet?

      We'll send AlGore there, and he'll invent them.

      Works for me. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    2. Re:IP laws? by isorox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hilary Rosens writing them right now...

  43. TLD by elgrinner · · Score: 1

    Would Mars be .Mars, and if so, I bet you one could persuade the famous chocolate bar company to sponsor the costs. Would look great on their marketing campaign ;)

    --
    But my Mom says I'm cool! -Milhouse
  44. Sucks huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hating America, all the while knowing that we are better then you in every way and that we own and control everything that you want to own and control. Don't be jealous, there isn't any point. Just accept our dominance over you and stop whining, you sound French for Christ's sake.

    1. Re:Sucks huh by mirabilos · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Noone has EVER told me I sound french.
      This is an insult/offence with an impact I can't
      put in words. The frenchmen are our enemy since,
      well, long.

      And wrt the rest of your comment: get a life.
      I have enough free stuff, including an open
      source operating system from Canada.

      --
      My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
    2. Re:Sucks huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, I'm an other french. I do not hate neither America nor the Americans. I hope that all the americans are not like you.

      Btw "Christ's sake" and "dominance over you" sound stupid together.

  45. IP? by jeremiahstanley · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does this mean they make little spacesuits for the carrier pidgeons now?

  46. IPv4 by prmths · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sure as hell hope they dont plan on using IPv4 ...
    on a side note...
    maybe a zero latency network using the spin of quarks as the bits ;)
    now the hard part -- isolating and seperating matching quarks amd keeping them from phasing out of existance..

    not to mention something to accurately detect the spin

    ok
    maybe i'm full of sh*t .. but wouldnt that be trippy?
    sending data instantaneously regardless of distance...

    who knows.. maybe another hundred years or two and we'll be able to instantaneously be able to phase matter in and out of 'existance' in any position in our 4d space-time at will by tapping into all 11 dimentions...

    1. Re:IPv4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who knows.. maybe another hundred years or two and we'll be able to instantaneously be able to phase matter in and out of 'existance' in any position in our 4d space-time at will by tapping into all 11 dimentions...

      In that case I'm going to send a few beers back along the good 'ol 4th dimension & strainght into my fridge. ......It WORKED!

    2. Re:IPv4 by isorox · · Score: 1

      keeping them from phasing out of existance..

      A whole new meaning to /dev/null

  47. Whole new meaning by Jaguar777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This brings a whole new meaning to A/S/L

    --
    Maybe you should educate the morons of tomorrow so they'll stop believing the leaders of tomorrow. - Dogbert
    1. Re:Whole new meaning by geomon · · Score: 1

      I guess you should add species to that list.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  48. Ping timed out... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [64.58.76.226] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 64.58.76.226: bytes=32 time=300000ms TTL=245

  49. Great by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like we do not already have a shortage of IP adresses for one planet already. Screw IPv6, we need IPv8 now instead to deal with this! 1,3407807929942597099574024998206e+154 IP adresses ought to be enough for ever space ship, space station and coffee machine in the future! (Don't quote me on that in 20 years, PLEASE!!!)

  50. Latency, no problem! by IAmRenegadeX · · Score: 1

    What's that you say? The packets take too long to traverse the solar system?

    No problemo. Just use a new transmission carrier -- tachyons!

    Now your computer downloads ad pop-ups before you click that link! Ain't technology wonderful?

    1. Re:Latency, no problem! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Only one problem - tachyons have never been detected.

    2. Re:Latency, no problem! by IAmRenegadeX · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you see the humor in the original post...oh, well.

      And, a thought on time-travel grammar: isn't it "will-have-been-will-be detected?" :)

    3. Re:Latency, no problem! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Bah, this is slashdot. If the moderators don't need a sense of humor, neither do I!

  51. Pfft by rtscts · · Score: 1

    Yet more proof of American oppression of the Martians.. just look at all the propogana movies they produced last century - they're getting the public ready for an invasion. I mean, the Martians don't just have have biological WMD, they are WMD (microbes)!!

  52. internet? by kipsate · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is nice that NASA is developing a communication protocol for use in their missions. It seems to have some advantages: only low-power transmitters are needed on space crafts if you have a retransmitting satellite hub around. (This is in fact done already - in missions that use a lander, the part of the ship that stays in orbit retransmit signals of the lander). Using a standardized protocol, the hubs can be used for many missions, even simultaneously.

    I wish the article on space.com had focussed on this a bit more instead of popularising it by mentioning Vint Cerf and the Internet. Everyone will realize that the infrastructure is not connected to the Internet (imagine - hacked satellite, DoS attacks). Also, the protocol, which can handle large delays, will have significant differences to regular TCP/IP.

    Also, I'd like to know how to NASA will solve a few problems that jump to mind. The communication hubs are only useful if they are close to the sending spacecraft. The hubs can not be put halfway earth and a planet, because of the planets rotation around the sun. So the hub would have to circle around a planet in order for future missions to that particular planet can use it.

    But then NASA faces the following problems: on planets with an atmosphere, the hubs will tend to fall to the surface, so in many cases they need fuel to keep their altitude.

    Secondly, the hub will only be visible from one side of the planet at the time.

    Thirdly, the hub needs power, where to get it from for an extended period of time? Or are the hubs only short lived? In that case, why bother at all?

    --
    My karma ran over your dogma
    1. Re:internet? by Lord+Kholdan · · Score: 1

      I disagree with several of your points. The communication hubs are only useful if they are close to the sending spacecraft. Why? signal strenght is not a problem in any way, in space you dont need strong signals and solar energy is plenty at planets close to sun ( But then NASA faces the following problems: on planets with an atmosphere, the hubs will tend to fall to the surface, so in many cases they need fuel to keep their altitude. Why cant you just put the hubs above the atmosphere? Atmospheres only extend few thousand km's above ground anyway and there is no technical reason why a satellite cant fly way above that.

    2. Re:internet? by Cerrian · · Score: 1
      Why? signal strenght is not a problem in any way, in space you dont need strong signals and solar energy is plenty at planets close to sun

      It's not that simple...signal strength is a function primarly of data rate, distance, beam angle, and view time with target. Here's one example:

      Have a lot of data to transmit with a short view time to the antenna on Earth?
      Well then just up the data rate at the cost of power consumption.

      Is your power requirment greater than your solar array's ability to provide?
      No problem,you can decrease your power consumption if you narrow the beam angle, but it may require you to have a pointing accuracy of .00001 degrees.

      Is the pointing requirement of .00001 degrees not feasible?
      Then install a RTG (Radioisotope Electric Generator, think Cassini) and your power problems are solved

      The RTG bring the American public down your back?
      No problem, just ask for an additional $ 200,000,000 and you'll buy more solar arrays, batteries, the gimbling system with .00001 accuracy, and the larger lauch vehicle.

      Who ever thought sending porn to Mars and back could be so expensive??

    3. Re:internet? by JimBoBz · · Score: 1

      Also, I'd like to know how to NASA will solve a few problems that jump to mind. The communication hubs are only useful if they are close to the sending spacecraft. The hubs can not be put halfway earth and a planet, because of the planets rotation around the sun. So the hub would have to circle around a planet in order for future missions to that particular planet can use it.

      But then NASA faces the following problems: on planets with an atmosphere, the hubs will tend to fall to the surface, so in many cases they need fuel to keep their altitude.

      Secondly, the hub will only be visible from one side of the planet at the time.

      Thirdly, the hub needs power, where to get it from for an extended period of time? Or are the hubs only short lived? In that case, why bother at all?


      I'm no expert but wouldn't some Lagrange points & a Solar powered ion engine solve your problems?

      --
      For your poor moderation, you have been assessed a karma penalty.
  53. interplanetary internet huh? by addaboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    so now i can get offers to enlarge my penis, buy cheap viagra, meet some hooker, buy my next vacation, etc.. from a martian? the internet is fast becoming a marketing/advertising wasteland. when are we going to be traveling to the planets anyways? funny, i just watched 2001 a space odyssey last night again, I was laughing about the phone calls in space, but the internet in space? now the astronauts will have new ways to really waste time. it's sad really, I don't understand why we as a civilization can't put our differences aside and travel the stars. I wish I'd been born two or three hundred years from now.

  54. Great,... by A+non+moose+cow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...so the Slashdot "FP!" crowd can be sending in stragglers for hours.

    1. Re:Great,... by addaboy · · Score: 1

      I can see it now, they'll all subscribe to get THE first post form Mars or the moon.

  55. I am surprised. by An+Anonymous+Cow · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one has mentioned all these neat FTL communications technologies people seem to be developing.

    --

    -
    Moooo!!!

  56. seti-net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 10 years ago I went to hear Timothy Ferris read from his then newest book The Mind's Sky: Human Intelligence in a Cosmic Context (at powells.com). The chapter he read from talked about how instead of spending a ton of money trying to figure out how to physically travel to other solar systems in search of other intel- life forms (very expensive, highly unlikely and impractical), we should instead put all of that money towards searching out and hooking up to the intergalactic network(s) that may already be out there (much cheaper and more likely), including those developed or extended by civ's that no longer exist yet live on in there stored histories. He assumed that by the time we did find such a net and figured out how to hook up to it, vr should have advanced enough such that our experience would be equal to that of physical contact and communication. Hope so.

  57. Error in link to my column by rpiquepa · · Score: 1

    The link to my column about "The Interplanetary Internet" is http://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/2003/05/05.html, and not http://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/2003/05/04.html, which refers to another story. Sorry about the mistake. If Hemos or another member of the editorial committee of Slashdot reads this, please apply the correction. Many thanks in advance. Roland Piquepaille.

  58. you won't play Doom on this network by sstory · · Score: 2, Funny

    The ping time to Venus SUX

  59. promising future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great! now if we could only get to those other planets ourselfs how about living there first and then worry about internet access?
    this makes as much sense and the people trying to get tribes in the middle of africa internet access, get real.

  60. You may be able to get away with it by Absurd+Being · · Score: 1

    If you send the messages faster than light for half the trip. Gain latency on one side, lose it on the other. Zero lag.

    --
    Karma: Excellent^(-t/Tau), Tau=Wittiness/Trollishness
  61. it makes sence to have one by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    becasue it is difficult to communicate from a ship to earth while it is at the orbit of jupiter and since we will have that rocket power in the next 30 years to be able to get to jupiter in 9 months we need to deploy communication ubs so that the comunications can be sent to a hub and routed to earth rather than the ship having to maintain earths location all throughout the trip.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  62. Forget SETI@home by Mikey-San · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first detection of intelligent extraterrestrial life will be an unpassworded AirPort Base Station called "androme2135".

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  63. Satellites IP address by rzbx · · Score: 1

    Btw, the IP address to that one military satellitwe, the one armed with nuclear missiles, yea, that one. The IP address is 127.1.34.46 Have fun!

    --
    Question everything.
  64. A Fire Upon The Deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Surprised that no one seems to have mentioned this book, as part of it deals with conjecture as to how a universe-wide Internet might work.

    1. Re:A Fire Upon The Deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [tight beam, M32, tra. @n4.28.885.1008]
      xGCU Child Prodigy
      oGCU Anonymous Coward
      Not surprised at all. There are too many choices - all speculative - in humanoid fiction.

  65. Squid Proxies by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

    Now here's where we'd notice a huge difference w/ nice Squid caches/proxies.

  66. From the Jargon File by goodchef · · Score: 3, Funny
    martian n. A packet sent on a TCP/IP network with a source address of the test loopback interface [127.0.0.1]. This means that it will come back labeled with a source address that is clearly not of this earth. "The domain server is getting lots of packets from Mars. Does that gateway have a martian filter?"

    Guess we'll have to change that one once IPN is a reality...

    --

    "Inflammable means flammable? What a strange country!" -Dr. Nick, The Simpsons

  67. Yes! I'm closer to my master plan now! by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for some off-planet colo space to start my gambling and pr0n server farm. Try to stop me now, you damn lawyers and politicians!

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  68. quantum physics has a solution by Aviancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all the whining about latency times, I don't see anyone looking for solutions! Check this out:
    Quantum Networking. By using photons with quantum entanglement, it's possible to transmit data from Earth to Mars with nearly no latency.

    Of course, we need a few good engineers to make it practical...

    1. Re:quantum physics has a solution by Aviancer · · Score: 1

      grr, link was lost: Quantum Networking

    2. Re:quantum physics has a solution by tomzyk · · Score: 1
      By using photons with quantum entanglement, it's possible to transmit data from Earth to Mars with nearly no latency.

      hm. From what I've read about quantum entanglement, there would actually be NO latency; what happens with one particle would happen to the entangled particle at EXACTLY the same time.

      And yes, researchers ARE trying to get entanglement to work better (or work at all), but there's obviously no use (yet) in talking about basing an entire planetary-system network on entanglement when there are so many troubles getting it to work in a stable laboratory environment.
      --
      Karma: NaN
    3. Re:quantum physics has a solution by Aviancer · · Score: 1

      The fact we can't do this yet shouldn't be a problem since we don't need to be doing TCP/IP (interplanetary) for a while.

  69. Data Haven? by silmarildur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder what might come of this in respect to data havens, if you can evade the law on an oil rig with at least minor success, I wonder what you could do on a satellite or another planet. Also, who will control the the data flow? Some damn good encryption might be necessary.

    --
    -Silmarildur
  70. Don't tell the script kiddies by Becquerel · · Score: 1

    If they already had IP's some L33t h4x0r would have already DDoS'd Jupiter and caused it to crash

    --
    My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
  71. Lets be sensible here... by xfs · · Score: 1

    "The IPN would form a backbone connecting a series of hubs on or around planets, ships, and at other points in space. These hubs would provide high-capacity, high-availability Internet traffic over distances that could stretch up to hundreds of millions of miles."

    Wouldn't a series of switches be better? It seems it would be a better idea to increase those collision domains...

  72. 0wnZOR3d 8Y 3+ by paiute · · Score: 2, Funny

    4LL tH353 WORLds @re YOUr5--3xcEPt EUrOP4. 4++3MPt n0 L4NdINg5 THerE

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:0wnZOR3d 8Y 3+ by Alsee · · Score: 1

      EUrOP4

      We've already got one Europe, do we really need 3 more?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  73. Imagine... by fdiv(1,0) · · Score: 1

    ...for once, the guys who keep complaining of a lag kill might actually be telling the truth!

    --
    --- "...And everybody died!!! Except for me, of course...you know why? Because I had my tray table up...and my seat ba
  74. Spammers on Pluto by AwesomeJT · · Score: 1
    Great, in the future, finally international lawas will catchup and make life hard on spammers on Earth, but just in time for inter-planetary spam. Although it might take a few months for spmammers to confirm your email address when you click on the "remove me" link. :-)

    Since we are addressing Internet issues of the universe now, lets deal with interplanetary spam laws in our own solar system first. :-)

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  75. In other news.. by bmantz65 · · Score: 0

    Kazaa is already moving its center of operations

  76. IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM GENERAL ZORGOFF by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Funny

    GREETINGS EARTHLING,
    I HAVE AN IMPORTANT BUSINESS PROPOSITION FOR YOU. SHORTLY BEFORE THE MOST RECENT MARTIAN CIVIL WAR, I HAD 37,000,000 (37 MILLION) MARTIAN GORANS SITTING IN THE FIRST BANK OF MARS. HOWEVER, NOW THAT THE BLUE THARK HAVE TAKEN OVER THE MARTIAN GOVERNMENT, I HAVE NO WAY OF GETTING MY MONEY OIFF THE PLANET.

    PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH YOUR BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER SO I CAN TRANSFER THE FUNDS TO EARTH, AND I WILL BE GIVE YOU HALF THE 37 MILLION GORANS, WHICH IS WORTH OVER 50,000,000 (50 MILLION) OF YOUR EARTH DOLLARS. YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION AND DISCRETION IN THIS MATTER IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.

    - GENERAL GURLAK ZORGOFF

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  77. No it will be faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are already patents for faster than light speed communications.

    By the time it is needed, that stuff will be in use, and delay will not be a problem. (and if it still is , all those physics nuts will love to know how fast their quantum junk moves)

    I think there was a slashdot article on faster than light communications....

    It involves being able to change the spin on quarks or something---where someone was able to confirm that if 1 in the pair changed the other did too. And somehow if they broke the pair apart it would still work --and they don't know why.

    Also, who said it would be electromagnetic? Maybe gravity moves faster than light? or this quantum stuff actually works? Or maybe we discover another force? Maybe someone comes up with a unified theory; so we can use them together in some way to beat the light speed limit.

    subspace here we come...

  78. First Post? by diverman · · Score: 1

    So, how will this latency effect slashdot first post? :) Will there be a race to the main database, or will someone who had first post lose it when absolute time data is finally received?

    -Alex

  79. First Post! by KingTank · · Score: 1

    It's not easy for a Martian to get first post, thanks to the lag. But I think I finally did it!

  80. Great... by gspr · · Score: 1

    Now we just need to put some more planets under our control... piece of cake.

  81. I guess wars of the future... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    Will take place in the IPN.

    Quake war:
    Mars vs. Earth

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  82. Re: The Interplanetary Internet by Ventriloquate · · Score: 1

    Great! All we have to do now is colonize other planets.

  83. Re:TCP/IP - Linux Kernel not ready!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is supposed to be a joke I think... there is no such file as ip.c (at least in 2.4.20 and 2.5.65)

  84. Re:TCP/IP - Linux Kernel not ready!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found it, the comment is in tcp_timer.c in 2.4.20.

  85. TCP is out, too. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, games are out, the round trip time being more half an hour to Mars. On a slightly more practical note, instant messaging won't be fun either.

    Nor will any protocol based on TCP, or any other handshaking or window/retransmissin error-correction scheme (unless you're willing to wait a LONG time for your data).

    We'll need something with serious forward error correction. And a lot of the fundamental components of the net will need a rethink before they're usable by humans at even lunar distances.

    For starters, web browsing will need a local cache - of essentially the whole internet. Think spiders and massive archives, and serious redesign on sites with dynamic content.

    But the pipes are necessarily too small for optimistically broadcasting everything - even if it doesn't change milisecond-by-milisecond. Serious filtering.

    And most of the data for sites is the images in the ads. That just HAS to get filtered down - as will other images. Boon or bane?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:TCP is out, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes ages for Microsoft Windows to reconnect my shared drives on a 100Mb LAN. They'd better think of something new for 100's of millions of miles of lag.

    2. Re:TCP is out, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For starters, web browsing will need a local cache - of essentially the whole internet. Think spiders and massive archives, and serious redesign on sites with dynamic content.

      Well, for static content we can just replicate some Google mirrors. :-)

  86. hmm by UU7 · · Score: 1

    Nothing like the /. effect to bring unfriendly planets back into line.

  87. Internet Addresses by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    One gets the impression from the blurb that each planet gets an Internet address...

    Wouldn't a Planetary NAT box be a bit too much of a hack?

    Maybe it's just the wording...

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  88. World's most disgusting headline blooper by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, whats the internet address for Uranus? http://ipn.myhomepage.ass ? or, .anus?

    Reminds me of when Uranus' faint rings were first discovered. Headline:

    IS THERE A RING OF DEBRIS AROUND URANUS?

    Probably missed because the "correct" pronunciation is "YOUR-ah-nus".

    Right up there with "MILK DRINKERS TURN TO POWDER".

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  89. Already a standard for ex-earth domains by drwho · · Score: 1

    This was set up back in 1993. However it is for the Solar System only, so it needs further expanding.

    1. Re:Already a standard for ex-earth domains by pilybaby · · Score: 1

      oh, i was just joking. Those people must have either been 'smoking' a lot or had real forsight to do that in 1993.

    2. Re:Already a standard for ex-earth domains by drwho · · Score: 1

      look at the date it was released ;) damn...just got whacked by that 20 second thing...that sucks, I type too fast for me own good

  90. How to modulate the entanglement??? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure they've explained exactly how to turn the quantum-entanglement into a communications device. In order to "observe" an entangled state you must "touch" it in some way. Doesn't this break the entanglement?

    It seems to me that a terrestrial "quantum telegraph" would be a practical first step. Not only that, it would probably be VERY, VERY profitable wireless transmisionless satellite free, comm nodes. Come to think of it ... the miliatary would love this as it would make cypher obsolete. Not only that, but submarines could communicate with HQ without having to approach the surface, AND unlike now ... they could talk back without being detected.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  91. /dev/blackhole by t1deman · · Score: 1

    will this replace /dev/null with /dev/blackhole. Now we can pipe all spam to the nearest blackhole.

  92. Great. by flacco · · Score: 1
    They can get an internet connection to Pluto, but Charter Pipeline still can't get 1.5m/1.0m to my fucking house.

    monopolies are great.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  93. one word by vurg · · Score: 1

    www.nakeduranushotties.com

  94. Douglas Adams quote by GQuon · · Score: 1
    From "the Restaurant at the End of the Universe":
    [...] Dr Dan Streetmentioner's Time Traveller's Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations. It will tell you for instance how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be described differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is further complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations whilst you are actually travelling from one time to another with the intention of becoming your own father or mother.
    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  95. Re:Visit this interplanetary website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 ??? wtf u jackass

    mod parent up u fux0rs >:F

  96. .procmailrc script by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1
    I'm already reworking my mail routing, to take out anything from the Vega star-system.

    You haven't seen SPAM lords until you've been to Vega.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  97. Windows 2150? by jim3e8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The increase in Windows version numbers is exponential (3, 95, 2000, ...). By the time 2150 rolls around, I fully expect to be at Windows Avogadro.

    1. Re:Windows 2150? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I fully expect to be at Windows Avogadro.

      Just watch for the traemark lawsuits fly when they hit Windows Google!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Windows 2150? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google isn't a number, moron. 10E100 is a googol.

  98. Won't work. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

    It is impossible to send useful information faster than light as this would be against a basic law of relativity.

    The only thing you're guaranteed is that once the state of one photon is collapsed then its entagled photon is as well. You have no control over what state said photons are collapsed to, just that they will go to opposite states from one another.

    I'm pretty sure that's how it works.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  99. This will end power shortages. by GQuon · · Score: 1

    This will end power shortages. We can just launch solar power plants, and download the power using EoIP.

    And if there are problems with centering antennae, we could just use IPoAC.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  100. Latency? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I am afraid this will introduce latencies remniscent of RFC 1149.

    64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms...

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  101. if you want an idea about the ping times by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    look at the time it took before i submitted this story and it actually showed up

    2001-05-24 23:44:17 msnbc has a serious story about an interplanetary (articles,news) (rejected)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  102. Interplanitary modem? by Blacklotuz · · Score: 1

    Im not very well versed in physics but I remember many years ago hearing that somehow you could split an atom or part of an atom so that you had two electrons and no matter what distance they were seperated by, change in spin of one electron would be duplicated by the other. I remember thinking that if you could alter the spin fast enough and read it reliably, this could be used as a wireless modem technology. I beleive the backstory of earth and beyond mentions this technology as well. Does anyone know the term for this and if it would ever be technologicaly feasable?

  103. Latency? by abcxyz · · Score: 1

    Telnet / ssh are going to be hell with the latency issues. Type a character, wait a month, type a character, wait a month....

  104. Einstein not a Computer Scientist by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    Remember,

    Einstein wasn't concerned with transmission of information. He was concerned with transmission of energy, matter and gravity.

    Einstein never gave quantum mechanics it's due. His saying was "God does not place dice". Einstein firmly believed in a stable deterministic reality. Well, it's very plain and obvious now that god DOES play dice and not just on a sub-atomic scale.

    Relativity does not preclude quantum entanglement from the simple fact that relativity does not consider quantum phenomenon. Basically, no transmission is involved, they're simply trying to take advantage of a little quirk in the universe to communicate WITHOUT transmission.

    BTW, we are also finding out now that the law of relativity in incomplete. Some researchers have developed ways of pushing light through select mediums at FASTER than the speed of light. They haven't explained the physics yet, they just observed (and replicated) the phenomenon.

    It doesn't seem to make sense or rekon with our Einsteinian physics. However, once upon a time the notion of light having constant speed regardless of frame of reference was absoluetly maddening. Newton did not describe this, how could Newton be wrong?? Obviously he wasn't, Einstein's equations reduce to Newton when your in the same frame of reference. I presume that when the physics are discovered to explain super-c light, that they'll reduce to Einstein.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Einstein not a Computer Scientist by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1
      Actually Einstein was very concerned with the transmission of information. He came up with special relativity after realizing that there was no way to actually determine absolute simulatneity of when events happen according to two difference reference frames because it takes time to observe an event when viewed from a distance. The transmission of energy, matter and gravity are just some ways to transmit information. If you want more details, read "Relativity, The Special and the General Theory" from the man himself.

      Quantum mechanics is a natural result of relativity. To say that relativity does not preclude quantum entanglement because it doesn not consider quantum phenomenon is absurd. It is because quantum entanglement cannot transmit information faster than light that it does not preclude it. Look it up. I agree that Einstein was wrong about deterministic reality. He never seemed to be able to accept the logical conclusions of quantum mechanics.

      As far as the often-touted FTL phenomenon is concerned you might want to read this. No thing has gone fster than light yet.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
  105. interplanetary porn! by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    It won't be long until we have www.pr0n.mars

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  106. The Whole Internet Catalog by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    For starters, web browsing will need a local cache - of essentially the whole internet.

    And I used to laugh (not in their presence at least) at people (What's a mouse? Is this a cupholder?) who said they "had the Internet on their PC."

    *snort* The whole> Internet?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  107. hey! by Docrates · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't anyone made a reference to the Ansible network yet?????? damn it, where did all the geeks go?

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  108. Biting off more than they can chew by jrl87 · · Score: 1

    What's the point of creating an Internet infrastructure accros a solar system if we haven't even finished the one here, on Earth.

    Seems like a waste of money and resources ... they should use the technology to improve the internet here.

  109. "World Wide Wait" becomes "Orbit Wide Wait" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how long does it take light to go from Jupiter to Earth? Talk about a problem with latency...

  110. Packets from Mars by ross.w · · Score: 1

    So now those broken packets will have to come from somewhere else?
    (other than Mars?)

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  111. Fathers of the Internet by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    Vincent Cerf... who is often referred to as the "father of the Internet."

    Really? I thought Tim Berners-Lee was considered the father of the Internet. Or is there something going on here that we don't want to know about?

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  112. Answer by GregoryD · · Score: 1
    The story is "Answer," from Angels and Spaceships, by Fredric Brown (Dutton, 1954). Here is the original text:

    Dwar Ev ceremoniously soldered the final connection with gold. The eyes of a dozen television cameras watched him and the subether bore through the universe a dozen pictures of what he was doing.

    He straightened and nodded to Dwar Reyn, then moved to a position beside the switch that would complete the contact when he threw it. The switch that would connect, all at once, all of the monster computing machines of all the populated planets in the universe--ninety-six billion planets--into the supercircuit that would connect them all into the one supercalculator, one cybernetics machine that would combine all the knowledge of all the galaxies.

    Dwar Reyn spoke briefly to the watching and listening trillions. Then, after a moment's silence, he said, "Now, Dwar Ev."

    Dwar Ev threw the switch. There was a mighty hum, the surge of power from ninety-six billion planets. Lights flashed and quieted along the miles-long panel.

    Dwar Ev stepped back and drew a deep breath. "The honor of asking the first question is yours, Dwar Reyn."

    "Thank you," said Dwar Reyn. "It shall be a question that no single cybernetics machine has been able to answer."

    He turned to face the machine. "Is there a God?"

    The mighty voice answered without hesitation, without the clicking of single relay.

    "Yes, now there is a God."

    Sudden fear flashed on the face of Dwar Ev. He leaped to grab the switch.

    A bolt of lightning from the cloudless sky struck him down and fused the switch shut.*

  113. Space Transport Protocols by shachart · · Score: 1

    check this out. it's NASA's space protocol suite....

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  114. I wonder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if my linksys (cough) CISCO router, will have a firmware update.

  115. Empty planets? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    One step at a time hey guys? Lets colonise the damn planets first!

  116. IP in SPACE! by MrWizard510 · · Score: 1

    NASA has for several years been trying to get 'IP in Space' to be practical. This approach overlooks an important aspect, which is that bandwidth to space is difficult and expensive. That's why we don't have it now. There is a reason the Deep Space Network (DSN) requires huge antennas and depends on line of site, and has a very low bandwidth (~300 baud) -- that's what it takes to get the message through. Adding relay Spacecraft nodes to improve visibility of target Spacecraft is a good idea, but more expensive than just building the target Spacecraft. And using up more of that precious (expensive!) bandwidth in packetizing protocols just increases the expense. NASA built the world's first ground wide area network (the DSN) to support Gemini and Apollo -- and it does not use TCP/IP. Nasa launched the TDRS satellites (ala Arthur C. Clarke) to provide communication relays for earth satellites to DSN -- and THEY don't use TCP/IP. Currently, we NEED the efficiencies provided by the simple DSN network protocol. Maybe one day, launch weight to orbit will be less important, or we'll have super high efficiency and low cost transmitters and receivers and processors so we'll have 'spare' bandwidth to apply to this flexibility. But that day is not now.

  117. Vint Cerf has been working on this for a while by TequilaMokingbird · · Score: 1

    I happen to work 15 feet from Vint's Office and this has been a pet project of his for years. The TCP jokes are funny and all, but they have some of the smartest people on the planet creating new protocols especially for the Interplanetary Internet.

    Check out Vint's own website for more info.. http://global.mci.com/resources/cerfs_up/interplan etary_internet/

    TequilaMokingbird

    --
    'You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think.'