"An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee.2 Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC."
Please explain how an individual can give such a large sum to a campaign and not violate the law?
Ok had to click through to the actual NYT article, it is split between a number of pacs and the campaign. So I guess I am to believe Trump won't be beholden to his few high ticket donors?
Most of the time it is not though, As the smart tv firmware's are rarely if ever updated. So eventually their apps stop working. Now maybe since yours uses the Roku it will keep getting updates, but I know from experience that you get what apps your device came with and if the provider makes a change your app stops working.
Current laws are not a problem, No one is going to be up in arms over HR 821 with Amendment 23 that allows for the use of DNA testing for employment in the financial sector.
A few years later it will be quietly expanded to other sectors until, like your social security number, it becomes a de facto requirement.
A computer platform is a system that consists of a hardware device and an operating system that an application, program or process runs upon. An example of a computer platform is a desktop computer with Microsoft Windows installed on it. A desktop is a hardware device and Windows is an operating system.
So when have you ever been unable to run whatever software you want in Windows? Use what ever hardware you want?
me neither, but how does that change the fact that they all work on Windows as well. Other platforms are catching up, but that does not reduce the openness of Windows. What does though, is signed drivers.
How can you not differentiate the Platform (The devices and software that your system runs) and the OS (the software that connects the user to the hardware). As a platform anyone can write software for Windows regardless the flavor. Anyone can develop hardware for Windows (and until recently publish drivers with no interference from MS, that has changed and going forward Windows as a platform has and will become less open)
Everyone arguing that windows is not an open platform (the default os for the general purpose computer) because the OS is not open source misunderstands what is meant by platform. No other OS in the world has as much software and hardware created for it as Windows, because historically it was an open platform.
I am not saying Linux as a platform is less open, but due to it's limited appeal it has not needed the extensive hardware support as Windows.
Name me something that exists on the Linux BSD platforms that does not also exist for the Windows platform? I am not going to get into an argument as to which is better , the discussion is how open is the Windows platform. Anyone can develop software for Windows with no restrictions, up until recently, anyone could develop hardware for Windows with no restrictions. That is by definition an open platform, we are not talking about whether the OS is open as that is a completely different thing.
What? Platform? Maybe he understands the word better then you. Windows as a platform has supported more hardware and software then anything else in the PC market.
His argument is solid. What other PC operating system supports as many hardware devices, has as much software developed for it? Regardless of the OS being open, Windows as a platform has been a very open to anyone who wants to develop for it.
The FCC regulates communication in America, not just common carriers. The FTC would deal with issues of anti-trust and consumer protection. They are always under the FTC if they do business, but it seems the FTC was trying to do the FCC's job in this situation.
Why is the FTC trying to regulate a communications company, Isn't that the FCC's job? I mean unless this is an anti-trust issue it really seems like it would fall outside of the FTC's authority.
Seeing as the majority of people do not seem to share your pain I would guess it is something that you have to work on yourself instead of expecting everyone around you to acquiesce to your wishes.
Elections are always called before they are over. And they almost always get it right. So somehow the news reports a winner and somehow that means the DNC was cheating? Not sure how you make that leap.
Exactly how was the primary stolen?
16.9 million voted for Hillary and 13.2 million voted for Bernie.
Seeing the divide between the two camps I really doubt any of the shenanigans that happened behind the scenes had any noticeable affect on the split.
The people spoke, or at least the Democrats did. Nothing was stolen and you insult the majority when you make that baseless claim.
Why would you need to police, the police don't bring charges, you only need the DA in each state affected to bring charges. And a single charge can encompass many counts of fraud.
Slashdot Mirror
"An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee.2 Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC."
Please explain how an individual can give such a large sum to a campaign and not violate the law?
Ok had to click through to the actual NYT article, it is split between a number of pacs and the campaign. So I guess I am to believe Trump won't be beholden to his few high ticket donors?
Most of the time it is not though, As the smart tv firmware's are rarely if ever updated. So eventually their apps stop working. Now maybe since yours uses the Roku it will keep getting updates, but I know from experience that you get what apps your device came with and if the provider makes a change your app stops working.
I think the whole treadmill scene showed it was a disabling problem, hence the need to cheat the test.
Current laws are not a problem, No one is going to be up in arms over HR 821 with Amendment 23 that allows for the use of DNA testing for employment in the financial sector.
A few years later it will be quietly expanded to other sectors until, like your social security number, it becomes a de facto requirement.
Yeah but I really don't consider 128kbps to be 3g speeds. That is what T-Mobile throttles your connection to. I just had to deal with it.
Unless reaction time is long enough then no. A computer will react far faster then it is possible for any human to.
Out of 54 attempts to make it to mars 28 1/2 have failed. So to answer your question. Everyone.
A computer platform is a system that consists of a hardware device and an operating system that an application, program or process runs upon. An example of a computer platform is a desktop computer with Microsoft Windows installed on it. A desktop is a hardware device and Windows is an operating system.
So when have you ever been unable to run whatever software you want in Windows? Use what ever hardware you want?
me neither, but how does that change the fact that they all work on Windows as well. Other platforms are catching up, but that does not reduce the openness of Windows. What does though, is signed drivers.
How can you not differentiate the Platform (The devices and software that your system runs) and the OS (the software that connects the user to the hardware). As a platform anyone can write software for Windows regardless the flavor. Anyone can develop hardware for Windows (and until recently publish drivers with no interference from MS, that has changed and going forward Windows as a platform has and will become less open)
Everyone arguing that windows is not an open platform (the default os for the general purpose computer) because the OS is not open source misunderstands what is meant by platform. No other OS in the world has as much software and hardware created for it as Windows, because historically it was an open platform.
I am not saying Linux as a platform is less open, but due to it's limited appeal it has not needed the extensive hardware support as Windows.
Name me something that exists on the Linux BSD platforms that does not also exist for the Windows platform? I am not going to get into an argument as to which is better , the discussion is how open is the Windows platform. Anyone can develop software for Windows with no restrictions, up until recently, anyone could develop hardware for Windows with no restrictions. That is by definition an open platform, we are not talking about whether the OS is open as that is a completely different thing.
More hardware and software has been developed for Windows then any other OS period, I would think that makes the platform as a whole quite open.
What? Platform? Maybe he understands the word better then you. Windows as a platform has supported more hardware and software then anything else in the PC market.
His argument is solid. What other PC operating system supports as many hardware devices, has as much software developed for it? Regardless of the OS being open, Windows as a platform has been a very open to anyone who wants to develop for it.
Yeah, I was going to comment on that. I guess the whole idea that words have meaning is a lost concept.
The FCC regulates communication in America, not just common carriers. The FTC would deal with issues of anti-trust and consumer protection. They are always under the FTC if they do business, but it seems the FTC was trying to do the FCC's job in this situation.
Why is the FTC trying to regulate a communications company, Isn't that the FCC's job? I mean unless this is an anti-trust issue it really seems like it would fall outside of the FTC's authority.
Obviously BarbaraHudson below does. Even brings it up as a free speech argument according to some type of twisted logic.
No doctor is on call 24/7. Seriously 24/7 means every day of the week. No one should be expected to be on call 24/7.
If your on call all the time you are being taken advantage of.
Seeing as the majority of people do not seem to share your pain I would guess it is something that you have to work on yourself instead of expecting everyone around you to acquiesce to your wishes.
Elections are always called before they are over. And they almost always get it right. So somehow the news reports a winner and somehow that means the DNC was cheating? Not sure how you make that leap.
Apple has not even finished the acquisition of the company. After that they have to rework the design so it looks less, I don't know, bad.
I still use a 2010 Mac Pro, upgraded the cpu, but other then that it is stock.
Exactly how was the primary stolen? 16.9 million voted for Hillary and 13.2 million voted for Bernie. Seeing the divide between the two camps I really doubt any of the shenanigans that happened behind the scenes had any noticeable affect on the split. The people spoke, or at least the Democrats did. Nothing was stolen and you insult the majority when you make that baseless claim.
Why would you need to police, the police don't bring charges, you only need the DA in each state affected to bring charges. And a single charge can encompass many counts of fraud.