If you provision the ethernet on the ONT you disable the guide on the cable service (this can be fixed with a moca adapter). If you have only internet it's no big deal.
But the plan didn't cover internal wiring, so exactly what did it cover? I mean the only time you would need a tech to come is due to either a wiring problem from the pole to the house or due to an internal wiring problem.
Sure it is. It is our right, it is within our power, as it is just an arbitrary moral code that makes it unacceptable in society (thankfully). Outside of society, the taking of a life is just as moral a decision as mercy (though mercy would probably get you killed).
Leave it up to New York? At least New York restores voting rights, unlike the 10 states that permanently restrict them, most of them being conservative southern states. I think that's a little more important then whether or not you can get a large soda.
Carol M. Highsmith
Rights and Restrictions Information
Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 20540-4730
Carol M. Highsmith's photographs are in the public domain.
Access: Subject to P&P policy on serving originals.
Reproduction (photocopying, hand-held camera copying, photoduplication and other forms of copying allowed by "fair use"): Subject to P&P policy on copying, which prohibits photocopying of the original color photographs.
Publication and other forms of distribution: Ms. Highsmith has stipulated that her photographs are in the public domain. (See P&P Collection Files.) Photographs of sculpture or other works of art may be restricted by the copyright of the artist.
Credit Line: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, photograph by Carol M. Highsmith [reproduction number, e.g., LC-USZ62-123456]
For more information, please read: Copyright and Other Restrictions That Apply to Publication/Distribution of Images: Assessing the Risk of Using a P&P Image
Prepared by: Prints and Photographs Division staff. Last revised: Sept. 20, 2012.
Carol M. Highsmith
Rights and Restrictions Information
Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 20540-4730
Carol M. Highsmith's photographs are in the public domain.
Access: Subject to P&P policy on serving originals.
Reproduction (photocopying, hand-held camera copying, photoduplication and other forms of copying allowed by "fair use"): Subject to P&P policy on copying, which prohibits photocopying of the original color photographs.
Publication and other forms of distribution: Ms. Highsmith has stipulated that her photographs are in the public domain. (See P&P Collection Files.) Photographs of sculpture or other works of art may be restricted by the copyright of the artist.
Credit Line: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, photograph by Carol M. Highsmith [reproduction number, e.g., LC-USZ62-123456]
For more information, please read: Copyright and Other Restrictions That Apply to Publication/Distribution of Images: Assessing the Risk of Using a P&P Image
Prepared by: Prints and Photographs Division staff. Last revised: Sept. 20, 2012.
"No, they're not. She licensed the Library of Congress to distribute them royalty free"
I keep hearing that but no one has provided any proof of that statement. The LoC does list them as public domain which they would not do if they were licensed.
Slashdot Mirror
As is the marathon swimming event.
"Many of the athletes have been taking antibiotics,..."
That should work well against the virus laden water.
79% of PC owners were able to block Windows 10 from being shoved down their throats.
Way to confuse ATT DSL and ATT U Verse cable. Two very different services.
If you provision the ethernet on the ONT you disable the guide on the cable service (this can be fixed with a moca adapter). If you have only internet it's no big deal.
But the plan didn't cover internal wiring, so exactly what did it cover? I mean the only time you would need a tech to come is due to either a wiring problem from the pole to the house or due to an internal wiring problem.
That covers every modern video game and game system.
Sure it is. It is our right, it is within our power, as it is just an arbitrary moral code that makes it unacceptable in society (thankfully). Outside of society, the taking of a life is just as moral a decision as mercy (though mercy would probably get you killed).
Leave it up to New York? At least New York restores voting rights, unlike the 10 states that permanently restrict them, most of them being conservative southern states. I think that's a little more important then whether or not you can get a large soda.
It works the same in the places that never restore voting rights, they are punished long after their debt to society has been paid.
Well that and running coax through out the city.
No Google provides a full service cable connection akin to FIOS. Local channels and everything. https://fiber.google.com/citie...
"Google doesn't do broadcast television."
It sure looks like they do in Kansas City
https://fiber.google.com/citie...
" Any if they put down jailbreak due to a dumb cop you can get harder time. "
Wha...? I have no idea what you are trying to say.
But thank you, you are the only person making the claim to back it up with evidence.
Then this may be a case of the LoC screwing up as her works are listed as public domain.
Carol M. Highsmith
Rights and Restrictions Information
Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 20540-4730
Carol M. Highsmith's photographs are in the public domain.
Access: Subject to P&P policy on serving originals.
Reproduction (photocopying, hand-held camera copying, photoduplication and other forms of copying allowed by "fair use"): Subject to P&P policy on copying, which prohibits photocopying of the original color photographs.
Publication and other forms of distribution: Ms. Highsmith has stipulated that her photographs are in the public domain. (See P&P Collection Files.) Photographs of sculpture or other works of art may be restricted by the copyright of the artist.
Credit Line: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, photograph by Carol M. Highsmith [reproduction number, e.g., LC-USZ62-123456]
For more information, please read: Copyright and Other Restrictions That Apply to Publication/Distribution of Images: Assessing the Risk of Using a P&P Image
Prepared by: Prints and Photographs Division staff. Last revised: Sept. 20, 2012.
"the point is the pictures are free to the public, but not public domain."
According to who? Please cite your source as the LoC makes the claim they are Public Domain.
You and several others make the claim she licensed them to the LoC, Please cite your source.
Carol M. Highsmith
Rights and Restrictions Information
Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 20540-4730
Carol M. Highsmith's photographs are in the public domain.
Access: Subject to P&P policy on serving originals.
Reproduction (photocopying, hand-held camera copying, photoduplication and other forms of copying allowed by "fair use"): Subject to P&P policy on copying, which prohibits photocopying of the original color photographs.
Publication and other forms of distribution: Ms. Highsmith has stipulated that her photographs are in the public domain. (See P&P Collection Files.) Photographs of sculpture or other works of art may be restricted by the copyright of the artist.
Credit Line: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, photograph by Carol M. Highsmith [reproduction number, e.g., LC-USZ62-123456]
For more information, please read: Copyright and Other Restrictions That Apply to Publication/Distribution of Images: Assessing the Risk of Using a P&P Image
Prepared by: Prints and Photographs Division staff. Last revised: Sept. 20, 2012.
What license? Can anyone claiming these works are licensed produce the actual terms of the license?
The LoC distributes them as public domain. To me that would mean the public owns them and that the creator has relinquished all rights.
"No, they're not. She licensed the Library of Congress to distribute them royalty free"
I keep hearing that but no one has provided any proof of that statement. The LoC does list them as public domain which they would not do if they were licensed.
It shouldn't be too tough since the LoC lists her works as public domain, not as licensed works.
And upon hearing her reply said the issue was closed. So what harm? Did she sprain her finger typing the reply?