Equifax is more like sending the box of rivets saying "PATCH RIGHT NOW" and the box gets left under someone's desk for 6 months, then the bridge falls down.
But it's more like a box with cover panel, some rivets and an assembly robot with a description saying "if someone taps this specific rivet on a specific angle with a specific amount of force, it may fall out, leaving other rivets vulnerable to similar attacks that may eventually weaken the structure enough for the bridge to collapse" and all they have to do it turn on the robot and it will automatically install the panel over the vulnerable rivet to mitigate the issue.
I know, right! They should make the body out of solar panels!
That's got to be at least 7 square metres of area facing the sun. In the middle of the day, that's about 7kW of energy they're pissing away. The Prius PIH has an 8.8kW battery that gives it 25 miles range, 350Whr per mile. With 21% efficacy panels, that's about 1.5kW of power, or 4 miles range per hour.
You could drive 5 miles to the movies, park in the sun, watch your movie, drive home, and by the time you get back, your battery has the same charge as when you left.
You could also look at it as extending the range by 10%. More if you're stuck in slow traffic.
A car that's only existed less than 21 years would be banned in 22 years from now, unless it can extend its electric only range from 11 miles to 50 miles.
That's a huge ask for Toyota to be able to push their technology that much.
Wait... that 11 miles it the first gen plug in hybrid. Their second generation does 25 miles. I think they might be able to hit 50 miles by 2040.
Until all the cars on the road have LIDAR, and they start interfering with each other. That's going to be a problem with all types of active sensors - LIDAR, RADAR, ultrasonic. etc. They all work by sending out a signal and measuring the reflections. That works until there is too much other noise because all the cars around you are also shining their lasers on to the same things you're measuring. Or the laser projections from other cars directly hit the image sensor and throw out the signal to noise ratio it can work with. Or the sun is shining on it, also flooding it with a similar wavelength to the infrared lasers they use.
Facebook just trained their image recognition "AI" with over 3 billion instagram images
They then only scored 85% in a test.
Self-driving cars aren't going to be able to recognise what they're looking at. Is it a person crossing the road wearing a big raincoat, or is it a newspaper being blown around in the wind?
I know you're not a lawyer but perhaps you should look up existing case law to find clarification for your interpretation of a law.
If you break your phone screen by dropping something on it and the manufacturer provides free broken screen replacements, sure, perhaps they can predicate the warranty on using you having them replace your screen for free.
They can't deny you warranty cover for any issues not relating to the screen if they don't give away free screens and you previously had your screen replaced by a third party.
That's the thing with laws. They need to not only be read in context with the entire bill/act, but also with all the precedents set by previous judgements that clarify the interpretation.
Perhaps they have load dump protection elsewhere in the system. Perhaps the load dump protection in the PCM works by shunting current until a fuse blows, as it only needs to survive less than half a second at those high voltages. Perhaps they don't care, and if your battery connections fail while the engine is running, you're fucked.
1) Since when did French trademark law have jurisdiction over American domain names? 2) Doesn't trademark law require you actively defend your own trademarks? 24 years of doing nothing about france.com is not very active.
Standard automotive tests require components to survive 60V peaks. According to Texas Instruments, an automotive load dump for a 12V system can peak at 87V, a 24V system at 174V
It's not the power wires you need to worry about. They're well filtered, protected and low impedance. It's the signal wires that would do the most harm. They don't have much more than ESD protection, usually diodes to each power rail. Inducing a large enough current and voltage in, for example the oxygen sensor wire, usually located on the exhaust manifold at the front of an inline-4 engine, would be shunted to the power rails inside the ECU, via the protection diodes, on the processor side of the voltage regulators.
There's many other signal cables in front of the firewall too, like fuel injectors, temperature sensors and all the relays in the fuse box.
Of course it wouldn't do anything to a car without an electronic fuel injection. Like pretty much everything from the 70's or earlier and half the cars from the 80's.
You mean how people now pay for a dozen different premium add-ons now, when back in 2000 there weren't even a dozen to choose from? Effectively meaning the servicing you were paying for in 2000 doesn't exist now without a bunch of "add-ons"
That is... unless the average person pays for more than internet, phone and tv on their cable bill now?
In 15 years? The average car age on the road USA is approaching 12 years. in 2003 is was 9.7 years, in 2016 it was 11.6 years. In 15 years the average car will be similar to what's available now. Most cars won't have self-driving capability or car to car communication. There are plenty of cars from the 70's, 80's and 90's on the roads today. In 15 years there still will be. Maybe fewer from the 80's as they start turning to rust.
What they're saying appears to be the average cable bill in 2000 was $40. If you adjust that for inflation in 2017 dollars, it's $57. The average price in 2017 was $100. 57 -> 100 is a 75% increase.
Slashdot Mirror
I too am Ameri..... wait no I can't type that with a straight face. I would be embarrassed to be an American. I'm glad I'm not.
Equifax is more like sending the box of rivets saying "PATCH RIGHT NOW" and the box gets left under someone's desk for 6 months, then the bridge falls down.
But it's more like a box with cover panel, some rivets and an assembly robot with a description saying "if someone taps this specific rivet on a specific angle with a specific amount of force, it may fall out, leaving other rivets vulnerable to similar attacks that may eventually weaken the structure enough for the bridge to collapse" and all they have to do it turn on the robot and it will automatically install the panel over the vulnerable rivet to mitigate the issue.
Apparently Reddit is more popular than Amazon, yet the Google Trends for amazon vs reddit shows the opposite.
https://trends.google.com/tren...
The number of people who google "youtube" is even higher.
The numbers for "google" are even higher again.
I know, right!
They should make the body out of solar panels!
That's got to be at least 7 square metres of area facing the sun. In the middle of the day, that's about 7kW of energy they're pissing away.
The Prius PIH has an 8.8kW battery that gives it 25 miles range, 350Whr per mile. With 21% efficacy panels, that's about 1.5kW of power, or 4 miles range per hour.
You could drive 5 miles to the movies, park in the sun, watch your movie, drive home, and by the time you get back, your battery has the same charge as when you left.
You could also look at it as extending the range by 10%. More if you're stuck in slow traffic.
A car that's only existed less than 21 years would be banned in 22 years from now, unless it can extend its electric only range from 11 miles to 50 miles.
That's a huge ask for Toyota to be able to push their technology that much.
Wait... that 11 miles it the first gen plug in hybrid. Their second generation does 25 miles. I think they might be able to hit 50 miles by 2040.
Blocked. There is an option to enable autoplay for muted videos.
Chrome 66 for Android
I have autoplay blocked on Chrome for Android.
I never set it, so I assume it's the default.
There's lots of Chrome extensions that turn off html5 autoplay too.
vimeo.com? pornhub.com? redtube.com?
There's quite a few websites where the primary purpose is to play videos.
None, I imagine. It's a built in function of Chrome.
If they did, maybe the Coyote would have won.
Until all the cars on the road have LIDAR, and they start interfering with each other. That's going to be a problem with all types of active sensors - LIDAR, RADAR, ultrasonic. etc.
They all work by sending out a signal and measuring the reflections. That works until there is too much other noise because all the cars around you are also shining their lasers on to the same things you're measuring. Or the laser projections from other cars directly hit the image sensor and throw out the signal to noise ratio it can work with. Or the sun is shining on it, also flooding it with a similar wavelength to the infrared lasers they use.
They just need to kill more people in their test environments.
You'll need land departure warning systems when the repainted lines lead your self-driving car off a cliff
Facebook just trained their image recognition "AI" with over 3 billion instagram images
They then only scored 85% in a test.
Self-driving cars aren't going to be able to recognise what they're looking at. Is it a person crossing the road wearing a big raincoat, or is it a newspaper being blown around in the wind?
Except that would be illegal.
The onus is on Sony to prove someone else fucked with it.
I know you're not a lawyer but perhaps you should look up existing case law to find clarification for your interpretation of a law.
If you break your phone screen by dropping something on it and the manufacturer provides free broken screen replacements, sure, perhaps they can predicate the warranty on using you having them replace your screen for free.
They can't deny you warranty cover for any issues not relating to the screen if they don't give away free screens and you previously had your screen replaced by a third party.
That's the thing with laws. They need to not only be read in context with the entire bill/act, but also with all the precedents set by previous judgements that clarify the interpretation.
Perhaps they have load dump protection elsewhere in the system.
Perhaps the load dump protection in the PCM works by shunting current until a fuse blows, as it only needs to survive less than half a second at those high voltages.
Perhaps they don't care, and if your battery connections fail while the engine is running, you're fucked.
1) Since when did French trademark law have jurisdiction over American domain names?
2) Doesn't trademark law require you actively defend your own trademarks? 24 years of doing nothing about france.com is not very active.
It may be a surprise for some, but there is a theory we all evolved from single celled organisms.
The human brain wasn't created by an almighty being.
Standard automotive tests require components to survive 60V peaks.
According to Texas Instruments, an automotive load dump for a 12V system can peak at 87V, a 24V system at 174V
It's not the power wires you need to worry about. They're well filtered, protected and low impedance.
It's the signal wires that would do the most harm. They don't have much more than ESD protection, usually diodes to each power rail. Inducing a large enough current and voltage in, for example the oxygen sensor wire, usually located on the exhaust manifold at the front of an inline-4 engine, would be shunted to the power rails inside the ECU, via the protection diodes, on the processor side of the voltage regulators.
There's many other signal cables in front of the firewall too, like fuel injectors, temperature sensors and all the relays in the fuse box.
Of course it wouldn't do anything to a car without an electronic fuel injection. Like pretty much everything from the 70's or earlier and half the cars from the 80's.
You mean how people now pay for a dozen different premium add-ons now, when back in 2000 there weren't even a dozen to choose from?
Effectively meaning the servicing you were paying for in 2000 doesn't exist now without a bunch of "add-ons"
That is... unless the average person pays for more than internet, phone and tv on their cable bill now?
In 15 years?
The average car age on the road USA is approaching 12 years. in 2003 is was 9.7 years, in 2016 it was 11.6 years.
In 15 years the average car will be similar to what's available now. Most cars won't have self-driving capability or car to car communication.
There are plenty of cars from the 70's, 80's and 90's on the roads today. In 15 years there still will be. Maybe fewer from the 80's as they start turning to rust.
Maybe in 150 years.
... with several billion years worth of AI training data
What they're saying appears to be the average cable bill in 2000 was $40. If you adjust that for inflation in 2017 dollars, it's $57.
The average price in 2017 was $100. 57 -> 100 is a 75% increase.
You're right! 75% is nowhere near 74%