Slashdot Mirror
If Fortnite Were a Website, It Would Rival Reddit and Amazon (tomsguide.com)
Tom's Guide gives us some perspective on just how big of a cultural phenomenon the game Fortnite is: "if Fortnite were a website, it would be one of the top five in the United States." From the report: Take a quick look at Alexa's list of top U.S. websites, and you'll see Google, YouTube, Facebook, Reddit and Amazon in the top five. No surprises there. But as a quick Google Trends search reveals, Fortnite has become a hotter search term than Reddit. What some might see as a flash-in-the-pan gaming fad is actually outpacing one of the web's hottest destinations.
"More people in the U.S. are searching for 'Fortnite' on Google than they are for 'Reddit' and these searches have risen sharply over the last two months," said John DeFeo, VP of Internet Marketing at Purch, Tom's Guide's parent company. "When you consider that Fortnite had more than 3 million concurrent players in February, I believe that if Fortnite were a website, it would be among the top five in the U.S., duking it out with Reddit and Amazon."
"More people in the U.S. are searching for 'Fortnite' on Google than they are for 'Reddit' and these searches have risen sharply over the last two months," said John DeFeo, VP of Internet Marketing at Purch, Tom's Guide's parent company. "When you consider that Fortnite had more than 3 million concurrent players in February, I believe that if Fortnite were a website, it would be among the top five in the U.S., duking it out with Reddit and Amazon."
I've never heard this game until the media started writing about it this past week. Sounds like a currently popular game. Neat?
I don't respond to AC's.
When Slashdotters were kids you were all playing Pokemon and Doom as the fad games. Myspace was a top 5 site too.
Everyone knows about it already. Not many people know about the latest games. If it is featured in articles (like this one) people will search for it to find out what it is.
I don't know why people act as if any particular current piece of pop culture will be here forever. Just remember previous things: MySpace, Everquest, Diablo, The Beatles, Pop Rocks, Pet Rocks, etc.
Fortnite is just the latest obsession, and it will fizzle away, replaced by some future obsession.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
First PUBG, now Fortnite.
A website that provides information is not equivalent to a video game in terms of long term value to users. I've not played either of these games. But a year from now the community around this game will be a tiny fraction of what it is. That's just the nature of this industry.
That's barely a year old and remember how it was some national obsession? Now you don't hear shit about it anymore. Why? Because people move on. People will move on from Fortnite too.
At some point like 80% of the nation would sit down to watch it at the same time.
It'd be in the top five! If fortnight were furniture store it'd be the largest! If fortnight were a website and named Facebook it'd be in the top!
"More people in the U.S. are searching for 'Fortnite' on Google than they are for 'Reddit' and
Why would you search for reddit on Google?
Wouldn't you just -- you know -- type "reddit.com" into the address bar, or better yet, bookmark it? Then you don't have to worry about some temporary hijacking of search results that got a malicious site spelled something like "reddlt" ranked above the real result in the search results. Also, it's one less step to get there, compared to type it into Google, finding the result you want, and clicking on it.
What would be the reason you'd want to search for it on google?
I am too lazy to google (/. gives better answers anyway), and never heard of the game so far.
That's all you had to say.
In my opinion, reddit is failing due to the same factors that sunk /. from being the premier technology discussion site into near total irrelevance today. In both cases we've seen abusive moderation of various forms create an intolerant 'circle-jerk' environment where original thoughts are quashed. This prevents new participants from staying very long, while the existing community ends up dwindling over time. Soon the community loses the momentum it once had, and thus begins to become less and less relevant each day. Even if the site is still operational some years later, like /. still is, it's a pathetic disgrace compared to what it once was, before abusive moderation created a rotten environment where adhering to ideology matters more than having intelligent discussion.
Who cares? I mean literally, other than video game salesmen, who cares?
When I need to buy a new video game, I go to the video game store and buy something that's in my budget.
I don't care if it's AI powered, checkerboard rendering powered, or fairy dust powered. A video game is a video game is a video game.
didn't this flavor of the week get slashvertised two days ago?
'Fortnite' is searched for more often than 'Google'!
Obviously this means that FBR is more popular, and therefore worth more money. So invest in us. Please?
-- FBR publisher, Epic Games
Unlike those websites, its rise was quick, likewise its fall shall be as well. It's called a fad.
Apparently Reddit is more popular than Amazon, yet the Google Trends for amazon vs reddit shows the opposite.
https://trends.google.com/tren...
The number of people who google "youtube" is even higher.
The numbers for "google" are even higher again.
Fortnite's metascore (average of reviews) is 77 for PS4, 78 for PC. Its user ratings are 4.7 (out of 10) for PS4, 3.4 for PC. That sort of divergence between review and user ratings is usually a pretty good indication that reviewers are being paid to promote the game.
What a stupid title... I know they are trying to get people to associated usage with something tangible, but comparing it to a website is silly. And the number of searches has no numerical purpose at all; apart from people who may have heard of it and searched it but will probably never play it.
He's an 18 year old that doesn't annoy me. I like Fortnite but not that good at it, I guess I play Fortnite through him.
Fortnite is very popular at the moment, as are Fortnite streams on Twitch.tv and Youtube.
I started watching when he had some 300K youtube subscribers, now over 800K and pulling in 20K a day now.
So there are fewer prepubescent mouth-breathers in the other games I play.
Pfft, see you in Pochinki bitches.
This site is garbage. Tell me more how something irrelevant is comparable to something more irrelevant, with the only thing linked between them is " but you can find both through Google". Go to hell Beauhd.. "Slashdot, news for millennials, just everyday crap that may or may not matter because it's my first world right to have an opinion on it".
Not a nice thing but since it's free to play it's not as bad as if you had to pay 60 bucks upfront. If you don't like it just stop playing and you haven't lost any money just a bit of time.
I don't think so. You don't need to pay reviewers to like this game. It has some fun and engaging mechanics and looking at the people playing it we know that a lot of players like to play. Despite starting the matches at 100 players you don't need to wait long for a game to fill up. Being F2P means it has a low entry threshold.
But that many players give the thumbs down isn't surprising. This game favors one very distinctive form of gameplay, killing others. If you aren't the type of player that racks up kill streaks (which I am not either), most of the time you get killed quite early in the game and then you just sit and watch the game.
If you are someone that likes to watch gameplay videos, this might be fun. But as one that has never understood the charm of watching someone else play a game that I could be playing, I think it is boring as hell. Reviewers don't play a game for that long until they write the review, the probably never got to the boring part (or they like to watch Twitch streams). That is why the different rankings of Metacritic are interesting. What professional reviewers and the public think of something is not always aligned. And it doesn't mean money has been changing hands.
I think you're missing the history here though. Fortnite was originally not a 'battle royale' style game at all, and many of the early supporters (and people that put money into it) feel betrayed by its switch in focus. They very much drop the review scores.
Then there's the ongoing changes that any online game gets. A great online game may be changed by the developers to try and keep players engaged and interested, but invariably some of the original community will dislike the changes - the switch to Battle Royale being a prime example.
While those changes may result in new players with a positive view of the game, they're also likely to result in poor reviews from players who feel aggrieved at the perceived damage to their entertainment of choice.
It's one reason Steam now differentiates between overall and recent reviews.
That sort of divergence between review and user ratings is usually a pretty good indication
of business as usual in the game reviewing world.
If Oxygen were a furniture store, it would rival Ikea and Rooms to Go
"if Fortnite were a website, it would be one of the top five in the United States."
But as a quick Google Trends search reveals, Fortnite has become a hotter search term than Reddit.
Er ... the one thing does not follow from the other. At all.
Maybe everybody is just searching to see what the heck all this astroturfing is talking about?
If Fortnight was a book, how many libraries of congress would it rival?
PUBG > Fortnight.
I'm pretty sure Pokemon Go had pretty huge initial adoption when it came out in the summer of 2016. Judging based on download numbers isn't all that useful, but it still had a pretty big uptake for at least a few weeks, tapering down after that.
For that matter, never having played it it sounds like Fortnite is similar to what you find on many Minecraft servers (Factions, Survival with PvP), but built into the game and as the default instead of something you need to be shown how to get to. Basically they looked at where Minecraft had business holes (no good model for subscription or transaction revenue back to Mojang/Microsoft) and built something to capture the ongoing revenue that in the MC world goes to third parties running servers.
fencepost
just a little off
It should become common experience then.
So you don't actually play the game? You just watch someone else play it? I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
Fortnite was originally not a 'battle royale' style game at all, and many of the early supporters (and people that put money into it) feel betrayed by its switch in focus
And any PUBG fans who felt like the new Fortnite was ripping it off wholesale (including the PUBG devs, who made the unfortunately not well thought out statement that Fortnite is just PUBG, but free.)
fd, I'm pretty sure at least some of the articles are a result of paid marketing.
If I were a potato, I would be a world record potato. What relevance is that to anything, since I'm (probably) not a potato. And Fortnite is not a website.
Find a better use for your time.
If Fortnight was a book, how many libraries of congress would it rival?
What if.... Fortnite was a fruit?
So have we gotten to the point yet shown in South Park where we have YouTubers who make videos commenting on the other YouTuber's commentary?
So it's a bit like what happened to Gnome?
The solution's the same - create their own version. They could call it Forknite.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
If it's so bad why is it so popular?
or business as usual in the entertainment world.
FTFY
Learning games' (in general, I don't know about Fortnite, never play it) mechanics, strategies, etc on highly competitive games e.g. Starcraft II takes a lot of time. While watching pro tournaments doesn't take a lot of time, but still gives you entertainment values.
Do you also play football (err.. handball I mean), AC?
Find a better use for your time.
Watching may have a different meaning to you and I.
He streams a lot so have him playing all the time - in the backgound. I'm used to a tv playing while computing, but the commercials
over free tv (antenna) are obnoxious enough to find an alternative. But something has to be on TV for ambience.
But I've gathered enough tricks from him to help my son play some decent games. So it's been working pretty well.