The Bolsheviks had the right idea when they rise up and got rid of them. But since it's America you can just lay them off and not have to shoot their wives and families.
The White house can have a policy wonk, but no need to give them " czarlike" powers or any more title than "advisor." The Guy who was elected shouldn't be insulated from responsibility by an unelected staffer with a big title and media who go along with the fiction that he hassome kind of independent authority.
It's somewhat safe in the form of sunlight, although sunlight does cause cancer
I asked about microwave radiation, which is not present at anything like this level in sunlight.
Just on the ground side there are all kinds of technical problems: * how do you deal with clouds? * how do you deal with safety for people (and animals if you care about them?) * how much buffer area do you need around the receiving arrray and what can you do with it? * if there's an emergency, how do you shut down the beam? * how much airspace is made inaccessible over the receiving array and how do you coordinate with pilots to keep them out of beam?
On the space side how do you deal with: * forming a beam that you can aim and steer with enough precision * getting it fucking up there and with whose money? (It won't be mine.) * orbit maintainance * what do you do with the satellite during the (minimally) 90% of the time when it won't be in line of sight of your receiving array? * how do you ensure that the controls cannot be hijacked or blocked? * what provisions are there to disable the array when (not if) it malfunctions * can it be maintained on orbit?
It's impossible to remove sampling artifacts because once in the digital domain there is no way to distinguish between sounds that were originally on an inaudible range and correctly digitized sounds.
Not a problem. If many world is true I don't have to worry because there's always a future on one of the branches ahead of me where I will continue to live happily.
I think it argues not that the stars have a different environment but that the stars themselves are not so sunlike as all that.
It calls into question something tfa didn't answer: just how sunlike are these sunlike stars? Are they about the same mass and luminosity? About the same age?
I guess we'll have to increase all the milestone ages... age of concent, drinking age, voting age, and retirement age... maybe make celebacy trendy somehow... really start giving gays and lesbians huge incentives... and start heavily taxing marriage and procreation.
Marriage and procreation are taxing enough as it is.
I'd make an off-the-cuff guess that most people could extend their effective lifespans by 24% if they just got +20 minutes of moderate (heart rate up, light sweat) exercise each day. Cost? $0 and 20 minutes of time. Available to everyone, ready for mass implementation today. Compared to gene therapy, anyone could do the exercise today for nothing. And most won't even then.
So this would increase life expectancy from 78 to 96? I'm not buying it.
I wouldn't ever remove the default browser because I'd be afraid of breaking a critical function, and I see no value in having to choose between two browsers when I want to browse on my phone.
According to TFA, the questions regarded how important is it for Presidential candidates to tell us about security threats.
My response is NOT AT ALL. There will be zero difference in their approach to security threats
The question isn't even worth considering when comparing Presidential candidates.
Ask them about what they will do that's DIFFERENT.
Slashdot Mirror
The Bolsheviks had the right idea when they rise up and got rid of them. But since it's America you can just lay them off and not have to shoot their wives and families.
The White house can have a policy wonk, but no need to give them " czarlike" powers or any more title than "advisor." The Guy who was elected shouldn't be insulated from responsibility by an unelected staffer with a big title and media who go along with the fiction that he hassome kind of independent authority.
Who needs the UN in everybody's shorts?
1) Who the heck wears Internet-connected shorts?
Where do you think I keep my Android phone?
2) Do the shorts run Java?
3) Where can I buy a pair?
4) The UN? In my shorts? It's more likely than you think!
It's somewhat safe in the form of sunlight, although sunlight does cause cancer
I asked about microwave radiation, which is not present at anything like this level in sunlight.
Just on the ground side there are all kinds of technical problems:
* how do you deal with clouds?
* how do you deal with safety for people (and animals if you care about them?)
* how much buffer area do you need around the receiving arrray and what can you do with it?
* if there's an emergency, how do you shut down the beam?
* how much airspace is made inaccessible over the receiving array and how do you coordinate with pilots to keep them out of beam?
On the space side how do you deal with:
* forming a beam that you can aim and steer with enough precision
* getting it fucking up there and with whose money? (It won't be mine.)
* orbit maintainance
* what do you do with the satellite during the (minimally) 90% of the time when it won't be in line of sight of your receiving array?
* how do you ensure that the controls cannot be hijacked or blocked?
* what provisions are there to disable the array when (not if) it malfunctions
* can it be maintained on orbit?
It's a bad idea to work for a somebody that refers to what developers do as monkey work.
And yet this engineer feels most at home in a party that for years printed the delusion that Obama was born in Kenya.
Does it say how he disproved the sampling theorem?
I hope you're joking.
It's impossible to remove sampling artifacts because once in the digital domain there is no way to distinguish between sounds that were originally on an inaudible range and correctly digitized sounds.
1 kW/m2 of microwaves is safe for animals?
For people if you lose control of the beam? For electronics?
Not a problem. If many world is true I don't have to worry because there's always a future on one of the branches ahead of me where I will continue to live happily.
I think it argues not that the stars have a different environment but that the stars themselves are not so sunlike as all that.
It calls into question something tfa didn't answer: just how sunlike are these sunlike stars? Are they about the same mass and luminosity? About the same age?
Do they rotate at the same rate?
...most of them being gases...
And many times more planets not transiting stars than planets that do transit stars.
Who needs the UN in everybody's shorts?
$30 mil for the profile is a waste. Property who get to the profile were clicking on the ads.
It would have been nice if they'd announced this before the IPO.
1 Put incold virus.
2 Release in wild
3 Watch the fun begin
Imagine the fights for resources when everybody lives 10-20 years longer absent injury or infectious disease.
You could make a special case for items that require government approval. Start the clock when they are approved for sale or use.
Trademarks woulds still have to be protected.
Thus my other point. If I'm going to have to have two browsers on my phone, it's not worth the bother.
Unless 1 year in mice = 1 year in people.
I guess we'll have to increase all the milestone ages... age of concent, drinking age, voting age, and retirement age... maybe make celebacy trendy somehow... really start giving gays and lesbians huge incentives... and start heavily taxing marriage and procreation.
Marriage and procreation are taxing enough as it is.
I'd make an off-the-cuff guess that most people could extend their effective lifespans by 24% if they just got +20 minutes of moderate (heart rate up, light sweat) exercise each day. Cost? $0 and 20 minutes of time. Available to everyone, ready for mass implementation today. Compared to gene therapy, anyone could do the exercise today for nothing. And most won't even then.
So this would increase life expectancy from 78 to 96? I'm not buying it.
This reminds me of the "calorie restriction" guy, who found out rats live 50% longer if they are fed less food then they actually need.
So...they lived 3 years instead of 2.
So...would a human gain 35 years...or 2?
Same thing here.
Or would the human quit the study because he was always hungry?
I wouldn't ever remove the default browser because I'd be afraid of breaking a critical function, and I see no value in having to choose between two browsers when I want to browse on my phone.
According to TFA, the questions regarded how important is it for Presidential candidates to tell us about security threats.
My response is NOT AT ALL. There will be zero difference in their approach to security threats
The question isn't even worth considering when comparing Presidential candidates.
Ask them about what they will do that's DIFFERENT.
Somebody needs to educate these kids on how political change is really achieved in our system of government.