Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot that if Charliemopps doesn't personally approve of something, it must therefore be disregarded by the rest of the universe. Sorry everyone!
Uh, not open source
Neither are the games that are on offer, so you won't be interested in those either.
requires windows
Works fine under Wine.
only works with Internet explorer?
It integrates with Internet Explorer, to the extent of adding a launcher to a link's context menu. It also works perfectly happily on its own (see above).
A recent paper by Dr Rob Jenkins of the Department of Psychology at York University (UK) has managed to prove that you can get useful images of faces from the reflections in eyes.
Didn't anyone think this couldn't be done?
Are you sure he doesn't work in the Department of Bleedin' Obvious?
Lying flat on your back with your eyes closed six feet under ground?
would be to extend impermissibly the copyright of certain character elements of Holmes and Watson beyond their statutory period
That sounds more like the position of Conan-Doyle's ancestors. Conan-Doyle himself famously replied to someone who wanted to stage a play in which Holmes got married with:
"You may marry him, murder him, or do anything you like to him."
Yes, the News of the World was renowned for its stories on 3D printing and cutting-edge medicine. Why, barely a day would go by without finding the words "native phenotypic behavior" on practically every page.
Metamaterials Developed To Bend Sound Waves, Deflect Tsunamis
Is it really "developed" when it's not actually been made yet? It's a bit like saying "Nuclear bombs developed to send man into space" when talking about Project Orion.
I don't think much of their "related" articles either:
ASTEROID MINERS PREPARING FOR GOLD RUSH IN SPACE SATELLITE IMAGE SUGGESTS NORTH KOREA HAS RESTARTED NUCLEAR REACTOR DEPRESSION AFFECTS MEN AND WOMEN EQUALLY: STUDY PRESIDENT OBAMA TO NAME FURMAN AS CHIEF ECONOMIST ASPIRIN TIED TO LOWER RISK OF SKIN CANCER
That's a pretty noobish mistake for an Antarctic research team to make.
now trapped in ice and have called in ice-breaking ships to rescue them, which in turn will reduce the formation of sea ice.
By something on the order of 0.00001% - if at all, given the chaotic nature of climate interactions. For all I know ice breakers might increase the total amount of ice once they've been through.
We don't know how terrible the source images were. The curves at the bottom suggest there were only three input images, so the stripes may have been present in the individual images, and aren't the result of poor stitching.
Well done them and everything - I mean, I've not managed to put a probe on the moon - but when the USians are getting this back from Mars, I'd be pretty underwhelmed with my achievement if I were the Chinese.
Parallel can be viewed without glasses for very long periods if you can control your focus properly.
But then the two images are limited in separation to roughly the distance between your eyes, because you can't move them much past parallel.
I tried parallel-viewing Wimbledon the first year they showed it in 3D on a 32" TV, but I couldn't get anywhere near bringing the images together, even after I'd scaled the picture down to about 50%. If it had been cross-eyed, I'd have had no trouble (well, until the headaches started).
Does this make what SETI is looking for pointless? Should they instead be looking for lasers if they work better for communication.
Why would any of those lasers be aimed at us?
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot that if Charliemopps doesn't personally approve of something, it must therefore be disregarded by the rest of the universe. Sorry everyone!
Uh, not open source
Neither are the games that are on offer, so you won't be interested in those either.
requires windows
Works fine under Wine.
only works with Internet explorer?
It integrates with Internet Explorer, to the extent of adding a launcher to a link's context menu. It also works perfectly happily on its own (see above).
Didn't anyone think this couldn't be done?
Duh. Did. Did anyone think this couldn't be done?
A recent paper by Dr Rob Jenkins of the Department of Psychology at York University (UK) has managed to prove that you can get useful images of faces from the reflections in eyes.
Didn't anyone think this couldn't be done?
Are you sure he doesn't work in the Department of Bleedin' Obvious?
http://www.loadscout.com/features.shtml
http://www.loadscout.com/features.shtml
I guess you have to download the whole damned thing
Not necessarily.
http://www.loadscout.com/features.shtml
adopting Conan Doyle's position
Lying flat on your back with your eyes closed six feet under ground?
would be to extend impermissibly the copyright of certain character elements of Holmes and Watson beyond their statutory period
That sounds more like the position of Conan-Doyle's ancestors. Conan-Doyle himself famously replied to someone who wanted to stage a play in which Holmes got married with:
"You may marry him, murder him, or do anything you like to him."
multiple computer makers will unveil systems that simultaneously run two different operating systems, both Windows and [...] Android
That's right! We're going to revolt by continuing to ship their OS to customers! That'll show 'em.
I think one reason SSDs are not going to become cheaper than HD's anytime soon is because...
...they're better.
If you have important data don't store it on an SSD drive.
Don't store it on any one drive.
Dalek's are mutate life forms, riding in a machine.
Now I have an image of the little squishy Dalek sitting inside in a little chair, turning a little wheel and going "wheeee!"
(Username recognised)
Neural Net Learns Breakout By Watching It On Screen, Then Beats Humans
Women and children and nerds first!! The machines are coming!
Oh, my mistake. I thought it said "neural learns to break out" and then something about beating humans.
This is one reason why most people don't Capitalise Every Word In A Headline.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K1sNDEaEFI
People are just being forced to give up anonymity.
Really? Forced? Really?
Yes, the News of the World was renowned for its stories on 3D printing and cutting-edge medicine. Why, barely a day would go by without finding the words "native phenotypic behavior" on practically every page.
TL;DR: $11,530.54
Metamaterials Developed To Bend Sound Waves, Deflect Tsunamis
Is it really "developed" when it's not actually been made yet? It's a bit like saying "Nuclear bombs developed to send man into space" when talking about Project Orion.
I don't think much of their "related" articles either:
ASTEROID MINERS PREPARING FOR GOLD RUSH IN SPACE
SATELLITE IMAGE SUGGESTS NORTH KOREA HAS RESTARTED NUCLEAR REACTOR
DEPRESSION AFFECTS MEN AND WOMEN EQUALLY: STUDY
PRESIDENT OBAMA TO NAME FURMAN AS CHIEF ECONOMIST
ASPIRIN TIED TO LOWER RISK OF SKIN CANCER
Houston Expands Downton Surveillance
I love watching that show too.
They are in the artic
That's a pretty noobish mistake for an Antarctic research team to make.
now trapped in ice and have called in ice-breaking ships to rescue them, which in turn will reduce the formation of sea ice.
By something on the order of 0.00001% - if at all, given the chaotic nature of climate interactions. For all I know ice breakers might increase the total amount of ice once they've been through.
We don't know how terrible the source images were. The curves at the bottom suggest there were only three input images, so the stripes may have been present in the individual images, and aren't the result of poor stitching.
Well done them and everything - I mean, I've not managed to put a probe on the moon - but when the USians are getting this back from Mars, I'd be pretty underwhelmed with my achievement if I were the Chinese.
Some people will still not evacuate.
I find syrup of figs does the trick.
Parallel can be viewed without glasses for very long periods if you can control your focus properly.
But then the two images are limited in separation to roughly the distance between your eyes, because you can't move them much past parallel.
I tried parallel-viewing Wimbledon the first year they showed it in 3D on a 32" TV, but I couldn't get anywhere near bringing the images together, even after I'd scaled the picture down to about 50%. If it had been cross-eyed, I'd have had no trouble (well, until the headaches started).
Like every other year before it.