Robots.txt is essentially a 'you may trawl, link to, and archive/copy this digital information' or 'please don't trawl, link to, and/or archive/copy this digital information'
The giant machine would dwarf all of its predecessors (see 'Lord of the rings').
See what? The movie with the little people?
Oh no, I see what happened. Someone copied and pasted the summary without due care and attention.
Have you read what it says on the Submit page?
Please try to use your own words; if you're quoting another source, make that clear.
Either, editors, police that rule, or just remove it. Might as well do the latter since very few people actually submit their own words, as far as I can tell.
The phone could probably use the power of the radiowaves in the air to do very low power things like perhaps change an e-ink display slightly.
Wouldn't it be better to power it from ambient light (which was enough to power my calculator 20 years ago, and if there is no light there's no need to change the e-ink display;) ) or motion?
This is why we have two tides [roughly] each day - the side near the moon gets attracted to the moon, while the other side gets swung around on the outside and experiences centrifugal force, pulling it away from the center.
I heard it explained as the tidal bulge near the moon experiencing the strongest pull, the Earth in the middle a lower pull, and the bulge on the other side an even lower pull than the Earth. Does that do away with centrifugal force being needed to explain it, or is just another way of putting it?
As this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_fingerprinting [wikipedia.org] article shows there is an alternative that works.
You may need to ask your acquaintance to explain it better:
Also, unlike polygraph testing, it does not attempt to determine whether or not the subject is lying or telling the truth.
Robots.txt is essentially a 'you may trawl, link to, and archive/copy this digital information' or 'please don't trawl, link to, and/or archive/copy this digital information'
FTFY.
The language features, an emphasis upon readability
Not inserting superfluous commas, would be a good place to start.
So every time I call someone, my ass is on the line?
The giant machine would dwarf all of its predecessors (see 'Lord of the rings').
See what? The movie with the little people?
Oh no, I see what happened. Someone copied and pasted the summary without due care and attention.
Have you read what it says on the Submit page?
Please try to use your own words; if you're quoting another source, make that clear.
Either, editors, police that rule, or just remove it. Might as well do the latter since very few people actually submit their own words, as far as I can tell.
The phone could probably use the power of the radiowaves in the air to do very low power things like perhaps change an e-ink display slightly.
Wouldn't it be better to power it from ambient light (which was enough to power my calculator 20 years ago, and if there is no light there's no need to change the e-ink display ;) ) or motion?
Shake it to wake it!
TL;DR -- Peer-review everything means trusting nothing, disclosure of everything, and loss of privacy...
Your TL;DR needs a TL;DR.
Not many I suspect. All the porn does is stoke the fires of the perversion.
Would you admit, though, that it's possible that for some individuals porn may in fact reduce the risk of offending?
Use of the porn leads will lead to an actual victim at some point if the porn user lives long enough and gets the opportunity.
Are you talking about a particular kind of porn, or just porn in general?
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
You also appear to be refusing to admit that you could - however unlikely that may be - be wrong. That's not a good attitude to adopt.
You'll also being a bit of a douche, again.
Do the police have the right to go to every public corn maze ... without a warrant?
Yes, so:
Do the police have the right to go to every public corn maze looking for potential marijuana operations without a warrant?
Yes.
Found? Was he unaware that using a threshold of 0.05 means a 20% probability that a finding is a chance result - by definition ?
1 in 20 != 20%.
If p=0.2, then you'd be right.
Mom? Why won't granny boot up? I thought she was just low on RAM.
they are positive this won't slow down global warming.
the decline in magnetic activity could ease global warming, the scientists said.
without having to suffer the negative effects of alcohol
subjectively indistinguishable from alcohol intoxication.
Make your mind up.
The argument all the kneejerkers all say is that people would stop making media for cash.
Sounds good to me.
Nobody was part of the Renaissance to make cash.
But not fantastic?
Perhaps you should learn the difference between celebration and commemoration.
Also, I've got some fucking Jaffa Cakes in my coat pocket.
Woah... dude... what if, like, that's why we have relativity. The computers running the universe are on Comcast.
This is why we have two tides [roughly] each day - the side near the moon gets attracted to the moon, while the other side gets swung around on the outside and experiences centrifugal force, pulling it away from the center.
I heard it explained as the tidal bulge near the moon experiencing the strongest pull, the Earth in the middle a lower pull, and the bulge on the other side an even lower pull than the Earth. Does that do away with centrifugal force being needed to explain it, or is just another way of putting it?
How do you know which way the screen curves? All I see in the article is this:
curves downward at the edges
Which is ambiguous at best.
I see a lot of CGI, and this:
If W Motors manages to pull it off, the Lykan Hypersport could potentially be the first car to feature an interactive holographic display system
Yeah, right buddy. Now are you gonna come quietly or do I have to fill up my tazer?
...but it definitely sounds like someone is taking the piss.