Slashdot Mirror


User: wonkey_monkey

wonkey_monkey's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,419
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,419

  1. Re:85% efficiency on New York City To Get Manhole Covers That Wirelessly Charge Electric Vehicles · · Score: 1

    The article says 85% efficiency, which may be raised to 90%. 15% is a lot to give away.

    And how efficient is a petrol engine?

    Spoiler alert: not very.

  2. 10% shit. I heard 85%.

    Anecdote annihilation!

  3. Re:The Second Law of Thermodynamics isn't your fri on New York City To Get Manhole Covers That Wirelessly Charge Electric Vehicles · · Score: 1

    My grandfather, now 92 years old, has been screaming at his condo building for two decades now.

    Mine used to yell at clouds.

  4. Re:The Second Law of Thermodynamics isn't your fri on New York City To Get Manhole Covers That Wirelessly Charge Electric Vehicles · · Score: 1

    I don't spill much gas when I fill my tank.

    From http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/evtech.shtml:

    Electric vehicles convert about 59–62% of the electrical energy from the grid to power at the wheels—conventional gasoline vehicles only convert about 17–21% of the energy stored in gasoline to power at the wheels.

    So you may not lose anything on filling up, but it sounds like plenty of it gets wasted for nothing in other ways.

  5. Re:The Second Law of Thermodynamics isn't your fri on New York City To Get Manhole Covers That Wirelessly Charge Electric Vehicles · · Score: 1

    it is hard to imagine

    So is relativity of simultaneity, but that doesn't automatically make it not true.

  6. Re:And.... on Facebook Isn't Accepting New Posts, Likes, Comments... · · Score: 3, Funny

    And you just started a sentence with a conjunction. For shame!

  7. Re:Severity on IE 11 Breaks Rendering For Google Products, and Outlook Too · · Score: 1

    You don't have to buy anything. Use Classic Shell instead.

  8. How to FiX Slashdot HeAdlines on How To FIx Healthcare.gov: Go Open-Source! · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  9. Re: Like so many computer programs... on Sleep Is the Ultimate Brainwasher · · Score: 2

    A girl in slashdot, is that possible? ;-P

    You're dreaming.

  10. Re:I've seen the defragging happen on Sleep Is the Ultimate Brainwasher · · Score: 1

    an anthropomorphic rabbit

    Was he called Frank? This doesn't bode well.

  11. Re:How hard can it be? on Yeti Bears Up Under Scrutiny · · Score: 1

    I can't bear this much longer. We all need to take a big paws and think about what we're doing.

  12. Get a room on Last Operating ICT 1301 Mainframe Computer Set To Run Again · · Score: 5, Funny

    come and see, smell, and feel the vibrations

    Sure, when it's a computer it's okay, but try that with the exercise bikes in the women's gym and suddenly you're branded a pervert.

  13. Re:relevant (xkcd) on Capturing the Flag, SQLi-Style · · Score: 1

    If you can't tell by the number alone, get out.

  14. Bam! on How Many Tiny Chelyabinsk-Class Asteroids Buzz Earth? · · Score: 1

    Right in the Urals.

  15. Re:Mandatory registration on Visual Studio 2013 Released · · Score: 2

    Microsoft can remotely target your computer

    When additional data is requested, you can review the data and choose whether or not to send it.

    Interesting use of "target."

  16. Of course I was being mildly facetious. But the point is that the source is available, and while a single person may not be able to reasonably read and audit the entire code, it should be safe to assume that the thousands of eyes on it (even if only on small parts of it at a time) can contribute to make it a safer bet when it comes to deliberate (or non-deliberate, for that matter) shenanigans than closed-source. Not that most people won't just use Oracle's binaries, of course.

    You spew someone else's words with a venom such that you appear, for all intent and purpose, to be a little more than a cartoon of a person.

    Oh no you di-n't!

  17. You can get the source and compile it yourself if you're that worried.

  18. Does it even need to be said anymore when it applies to commercial products?

    Even the open source ones?

  19. Re:Not much improvement; drawbacks continue on Windows 8.1 Rolls Out Today · · Score: 1

    Hah! Yeah, that one never gets old or patronising.

  20. Re:no no no! on Windows 8.1 Rolls Out Today · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any review which doesn't declare 8.1 to be worse than 8.0 counts as a positive review. Don't you know anything about marketing?

  21. Re:Not much improvement; drawbacks continue on Windows 8.1 Rolls Out Today · · Score: 1

    3. Still not immune from viruses and worms

    You say that like it should be easy to fix.

  22. Re:speed: 1.5 meters/sec = 3.3554 mph = 5.4 km/h on How To Attend Next Week's Robotics Show Robotically · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Can one definitively determine any velocity relative to a rotating reference frame, except for 0?

  23. Re:speed: 1.5 meters/sec = 3.3554 mph = 5.4 km/h on How To Attend Next Week's Robotics Show Robotically · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know; is it still nitpicking if it's wrong? c can be expressed in m/s, but it can also be expressed in feet per minute or rods per fortnight. A metre is defined in terms of the speed of light (and the length of a second), not the other way around. The speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, but it is not defined as such. As a physical - as far as we can tell - constant, it can't be defined - it can only be measured.

  24. Re:Why is this even news? on Google To Support Windows XP Longer Than Microsoft · · Score: 2

    that fills every conceivable need of mine.

    FTFY. Some people's computing needs may be fulfillable with DOS. People are different from each other.

  25. Re:speed: 1.5 meters/sec = 3.3554 mph = 5.4 km/h on How To Attend Next Week's Robotics Show Robotically · · Score: 1, Troll

    Thats 5.0 * 10 ^-9 c for those of you who like non arbitrary units.

    Relative to what?