Slashdot Mirror


Sleep Is the Ultimate Brainwasher

sciencehabit writes "Every night since humans first evolved, we have made what might be considered a baffling, dangerous mistake. Despite the once-prevalent threat of being eaten by predators, and the loss of valuable time for gathering food, accumulating wealth, or having sex, we go to sleep. Scientists have long speculated and argued about why we devote roughly a third of our lives to sleep, but with little concrete data to support any particular theory. Now, new evidence (abstract, full text paywalled) has refreshed a long-held hypothesis: During sleep, the brain cleans itself." During sleep, the Cerebrospinal fluid fills channels in the brain, collecting waste products. It uses a lot of energy, leading to the hypothesis that the brain can't clean up waste while also processing sensory input.

210 comments

  1. Extremely variable sleeping periods by DavidHumus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how well this accounts for the extremely variable sleeping periods of various animals? See http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/chasleep.html .

    1. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cats must have very clean brains!?

    2. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by acariquara · · Score: 4, Informative

      Humans are polyphasic too, as infants. We are conditioned into a 8-hour cycle, but it's neither the most efficient nor the best one for your health.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    3. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Funny

      yep...brain waste excreted with hair balls.

    4. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by stms · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's easy you have a dirty mind.

    5. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      It's probably not the only cause of sleeping. There's a suggestion that mammals evolved to sleep more at night because a common ancestor was otherwise too stupid to realize that roaming in the dark = more danger of being eaten by nocturnal predators. The brown bat at the top of that list obviously has a huge disadvantage in daylight. Sleeping conserves precious energy of course.

      Someone has probably noticed if brain ventricle size correlated with amount of time sleeping across different species and within humans. You might imagine that more surface area for the ventricles = clears out faster = less sleep.

    6. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by green+is+the+enemy · · Score: 2

      Carnivores, small mammals and less active animals sleep more, large herbivores sleep less. Carnivores have bigger and more active brains. Large herbivores need to constantly watch out for predators. I think there is no contradiction here.

    7. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's the other link you want; that article only details artificial patterns. In short: it's normal to wake up briefly in the middle of the night, and take about 9-10 hours from when you first go to bed till when you last wake up.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    8. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by PRMan · · Score: 3

      And here I just thought I have insomnia all these years. I'm normal, y'all are the screwed up ones...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Author Nicholas Monsarrat kept a split-sleeping schedule he became accustomed to in the Navy when possible:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Monsarrat

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    10. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps this why they appear to be crazy?

    11. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by war4peace · · Score: 5, Funny

      "This was also a favorite time for scholars and poets to write uninterrupted, whereas still others visited neighbors, had sex, or engaged in petty crime." ...Or all the above, at the same time :)
      Like visiting a neighbor to have sex with his wife and steal some silver in the process... and then write about it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    12. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's why they are so cool.

    13. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > and then write about it

      Tweet during the act.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Surface tension in smaller channels requiring more energy/time?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    15. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by mspohr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was in medical school, I adopted a pattern of going to sleep for 4 hours in the early evening, waking up at midnight and studying for 4 hours then back to sleep for a few hours. This seemed to work well and improved my grades.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    16. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics! (Cars retired.)

      I have a question. What would an alien race that evolved in drastically different conditions actually look like?

    17. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This was also a favorite time for scholars and poets to write uninterrupted, whereas still others visited neighbors, had sex, or engaged in petty crime." ...Or all the above, at the same time :)
      Like visiting a neighbor to have sex with his wife and steal some silver in the process... and then write about it.

      Back in the day, sleeping with a neighbor's wife was a crime too. The silver stealing is superfluous.

    18. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Depends! Pick the conditions?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    19. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...actually, let me start a journal so this doesn't get cluttered. Here.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    20. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Silver was a very popular female name.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up, please

    22. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      Its also the reason teenagers sleep so much. And we thought it was because they were growing fast.

      I know I slept a lot and I was a filthy minded SOB.

    23. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by ignavus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cats must have very clean brains!?

      It's hard work running the world and performing the duties of an Egyptian god.

      Every cat knows that the human race is merely there to serve them and that's a huge responsibility.

      And then there's scripting all those funny cat videos just to keep us humans (their pets) amused.

      No wonder cats are tired out most of the time.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    24. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hi, ho Silver...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    25. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infants also have small stomaches and need to eat more often.

    26. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Japie_H · · Score: 2

      A quote from the accompanying editorial:

      "Sleep is universal among vertebrates (9) and has been found in invertebrates (9, 10). The total number of hours of daily sleep varies from as much as 20 hours in bats to as little as 3 to 4 hours in giraffes and elephants (8, 11)—and there is currently no reasonable physiological hypothesis to explain this variation (11).Because CSF perfusion of the interstitial space is limited to the surface of the brain during waking, and brain volume increases faster than brain surface area [even with the folding of the cortical surface (12)], larger brains should have a relatively larger volume of interstitial space to “buffer” the accumulation of sleep-driving molecules, and thus might be able to withstand much longer periods of waking before the inevitable switch to the waste-clearing state of sleep occurs. If only neuroscientists could easily bring live, large-brained animals to the lab." (emphasis mine)

    27. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by WizardFusion · · Score: 0

      Oh, for the mod points. +1 funny

    28. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about ants? "Ants never sleep." --Ralph Waldo Emerson, poet. Sleep is overrated. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    29. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by supercrisp · · Score: 2

      I read an article a year or so ago claiming that this was a natural rhythm. Apparently quite a few intellectual workers had this pattern. The one I remember is John Milton. Sorry, too busy to run down the article for you!

    30. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Winston Churchill adopted this sleep schedule during WWII, much to the annoyance of his subordinates who had to stay up late and then continue with a regular day.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      So Slashdot, right?

      --
      -
    32. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as, for example, humans that evolved on a smaller, faster planet, that gradually got larger and started to slow down.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    33. Re:Extremely variable sleeping periods by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Except that large ventricle sizes is associated with increased debris and stuff like schizophrenia.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  2. Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what happens when you don't sleep much? (currently running on 2.5 hours)

    1. Re:Obvious question by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From TFA:

      Many neurological diseases—from Alzheimer's disease to stroke and dementia—are associated with sleep disturbances, Nedergaard notes. The study suggests that lack of sleep could have a causal role, by allowing the byproducts to build up and cause brain damage. "This could open a lot of debate for shift workers, who work during the nighttime,” Nedergaard predicts. "You probably develop damage if you don’t get your sleep."

      Beta amyloids are specifically mentioned, those make up the plaques that are found in Alzheimers.

      Worth pointing out that the effects of sleep deprivation are well known, this is simply trying to explain HOW those symptoms occur.

    2. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, brain poop which may lead to many brain farts.

    3. Re:Obvious question by bob_super · · Score: 1

      Per the latest studies, higher risk of early dementia.

      If you don't kill yourself on the road first.

    4. Re:Obvious question by Deflagro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I went almost a week without sleep and it definitely screws you up. On day 5, I was hallucinating that there were people around me and seeing things out of the corner of my eye. I had a constant fuzzy feeling and had very little energy. It was an interesting experiment and it was not easy to get to sleep. It took me over a month to get back into a proper rhythm.

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    5. Re:Obvious question by icebike · · Score: 1

      Why should WHEN you sleep matter. Night or day, as long as you get the needed sleep.

      Some people may simply have a more efficient "cleaning" system, and need less sleep.

      But I have other concerns with this finding, because it suggests this fluid replacement only
      occurs when the brain is not awake, yet we know that there is vast amounts of neural activity
      when the brain is asleep and dreaming.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Obvious question by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Did you use drugs to stay awake? (caffeine counts) I've never been awake more than 40 hours.

    7. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should WHEN you sleep matter.

      Because if you sleep during the day and you're working the day shift it's not as restful ;-) There are also conflicts when trying to sleep through mother-in-law's visits, the kid's school events and "that movie" she's been waiting for all week.

    8. Re:Obvious question by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that it doesn't seem like night or day would matter much.

      The second point, you're responding to a new hypothesis put forth by the researcher based on the current findings. The current findings are only that it's cleared out during sleep, not saying that low neural activity is the reason. That part is just speculation. I'd suggest it's probably more complex, that the glial cleaning activity causes abnormal neuronal activity when it's in that mode. Perhaps the reason it happens during sleep is because if it happened while you were awake, you'd hallucinate, act even more irrationally and irregularly etc. Perhaps that's part of the reason that dreams are so bizarre. Pure speculation.

    9. Re:Obvious question by hebert.idar · · Score: 1

      Normally, a stint at the next psychiatric warden. You better get some help NOW.

    10. Re:Obvious question by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is activity, particularly during REM sleep, but it is certainly not of the well coordinated nature of the waking state.

      As for when, it's only important because most people find daytime sleeping less restful and more prone to frequent wakeups.

    11. Re:Obvious question by sjames · · Score: 1

      The metabolic toxins build up. eventually they cause lasting damage.

      Might should sleep!

    12. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 5 days is crazy. If I stay up until 2 or 3 in the morning I am messed up the next day... can't imagine staying awake for a full 48 hours, let alone 5 days.

    13. Re:Obvious question by Deflagro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not that I remember. It was rough for the first two days but by day 3 I just didn't feel like sleeping anymore. I watched TV or played games all night until people were alive again and continued on with my day. I was exhausted though both mentally and physically somehow. The day after I finally slept was probably the worst. Still no energy but now coupled with nausea and no appetite. It was like a withdrawal of some sort... not recommended :P
      I already kick into REM sleep really fast as it is so when I was not sleeping, I would sort of dream while being awake. It's a crazy experience for sure.

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    14. Re:Obvious question by Holi · · Score: 2

      5 days? that's nothing, 11 days was my record, granted numerous quantities of drugs were involved. By that time I was quite psychotic though and a good friend firmly suggested I sleep with a very well placed punch.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    15. Re:Obvious question by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Took until day 5? At 24 hours I'm seeing and hearing things, as well as the earth constantly shifting underneath me. At 36 hours I could be locked up.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    16. Re:Obvious question by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Why should WHEN you sleep matter. Night or day, as long as you get the needed sleep.

      Some people may simply have a more efficient "cleaning" system, and need less sleep.

      But I have other concerns with this finding, because it suggests this fluid replacement only occurs when the brain is not awake, yet we know that there is vast amounts of neural activity when the brain is asleep and dreaming.

      Why should WHEN you sleep matter.

      Give shift work a go, not just for a couple of days, try it for a few years. It's like a permanent hang over only without the headache. However I agree, according to MRI scans the brain is actually MORE active during sleep than when it's awake, and not just during dreaming. It's an interesting finding but the "hypothesis" in the summary doesn't make sense to me either, nor can I see anything that resembles it in the abstract. Perhaps the "hypothesis" is just the submitter's speculation?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 5 days is crazy. If I stay up until 2 or 3 in the morning I am messed up the next day... can't imagine staying awake for a full 48 hours, let alone 5 days.

      How old are you?

      I've heard and can provide anecdotal evidence that the young can accumulate a sleep debt with much lower interest rates.

    18. Re:Obvious question by TapeCutter · · Score: 0

      Opps, cocked up the quotes in that post.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    19. Re:Obvious question by dbIII · · Score: 0

      Why should WHEN you sleep matter. Night or day, as long as you get the needed sleep

      A lot of shift workers don't get as much of that needed sleep due to outside interruptions so that's why it's relevant. I'm sure that just slipped your mind and you are not so utterly stupid as to think living in a noisy city is going to have zero impact on people trying to sleep during the day.

    20. Re:Obvious question by icebike · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've done my share of sift work in the past.
      Oddly I would seek to trade guys to work their graveyard shift, so that I could stay on that shift. I found no shortage of takers.
      Plant was cooler at night, and house was quieter to sleep with the rest of the family at work or school.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    21. Re:Obvious question by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Hmm you must have issues travelling long distances. I regularly fly between Australia and the US and since I can't sleep on planes and since you usually arrive first thing in the morning at the destination, it's usually approximately 30-36 hours awake total. I'm tired, sure, but not experiencing those kind of symptoms.

    22. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did ~130 hours once during some military training. I had a couple conversations with people who weren't there, and saw words spelled out in the lights in skyscrapers. Another guy with us threw his boat paddle "at alligators" (we were in southern california.) I couldn't sleep for more than a couple hours at a time for at least a month.

    23. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plot twist: He's your pilot

    24. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's like defrag, scandisk, and any other garbage collection or optimization routine all rolled into one. It can tie up processes, even though no new data is being input or analyzed. The fact that it's necessary as it is, seems to imply that the way the brain handles and stores new data is fairly loose and fast. Yet that method of data handling isn't good for long-term storage, so it needs optimization later on. Obviously this gets done when processing cycles are free from working on real-time data.

      The screen savers or mini-games we get to watch while this task gets done are fairly enjoyable though, so it's not all bad.

      Also the garbage that collects if the routine isn't performed in a timely basis adds up. It's likely why you may start to hallucinate with effects similar to certain drugs when you're sleep deprived enough. In either case the brain chemistry goes out of whack.

    25. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess for the same reason as WHEN you pee matters.

    26. Re:Obvious question by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      You are full of shit. 11 days? 264 hours? No you didn't. You are a liar.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    27. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me, after day 3 I lost the need to sleep.

    28. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Eyes evolved blue light sensors (I don't know their technical name) which send signals that control melatonin (and other hormones) production. When there's no blue light (at night), melatonin production increases and that makes you fell sleepy. All your other cells and organs detect the increased melatonin and switch to their 'repair and clean up' modes. The increased production lasts around 9-12 hours.

      If you sleep during the day, you'll have more blue light hitting your eyes and your melatonin (and a bunch of other helpful hormones) levels will be lower thus your cells won't 'repair and clean up' at optimal levels if at all.

      If you sleep fully in the dark during the day then you're fine, except for the benefits of being in sunlight during the day.

    29. Re:Obvious question by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      White noise generators solve the noise problem, for me anyway. I suspect the bigger problem for shift workers is trying to coordinate with daytime people and attend social/family events without messing up their sleep schedule.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    30. Re:Obvious question by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      11 days is the all-time world record: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Gardner_(record_holder)

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    31. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The surgeon is his mother.

    32. Re:Obvious question by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      When you don't sleep much, you ask obvious questions, for one.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    33. Re:Obvious question by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Well, it probably matters because the body is designed/evolved to work during the day. In general, cleanup is done when systems are down, if the system is not down, it's not going to get cleaned properly.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    34. Re:Obvious question by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you should read the link you provided, see that it is about the longest length of time WITHOUT STIMULANTS, and then realize it has nothing to do with the parent post.

      Thanks for the trivia though -->trash.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  3. Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to imagine it as the brain defragmenting itself. Imagine that! A computer guy seeing biological topics through a computer-geek lens!

    1. Re:Neat. by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      For teenagers, it's more like a cron job running rm -rf /knowledge/school/exam_answers/*

    2. Re:Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      For teenagers, it's more like a cron job running rm -rf /knowledge/school/exam_answers/*

      Okay, how to I root my brain to edit my crontab???? Then I can finally not me fail english, which I that unpossible.

    3. Re:Neat. by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and a perhaps even more adequate analogy would seem to be the 'garbage collection'...

    4. Re:Neat. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      For teenagers, it's more like a cron job running rm -rf /knowledge/school/exam_answers/*

      Okay, how to I root my brain to edit my crontab???? Then I can finally not me fail english, which I that unpossible.

      By an alarm clock.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Neat. by garyebickford · · Score: 2

      Find this book: "Mind Games", published around 1970. Find some friends, go through the exercises (doing each set a few times per week until you've mastered each level or whatever), over a period of about 2-3 months. This was the 'textbook' for a cool class I took a long time ago, called "Altered States of Consciousness Problem Solving Workshop". The purpose of the class was to research the potential for setting subjects with a problem, have them go into these altered states, and then record the results they came up with while in the altered state.

      It's well known that many creative people (and probably everybody) will have problems they are not really thinking of consciously, and after days, weeks, months or years suddenly come up with the answer. Nietzche wrote about having had disabling migraines for a year, until one night he went for a walk, and on the top of a mountain the entire text of "Thus Spake Zarathrustra" came to him all at once, and he went home and copied it down.

      By the end of the class I was in fairly complete control of my dreams - I could set myself a problem and solve it in my sleep; I could alter the plot of dreams - they're MY dreams, it's MY world, and I can make anything happen the way I want - think of yourself as Gandalf in the dream; and as an added bonus I could program myself to sleep for any given time from a few minutes to 10 hours, and wake up accurately on the dot, fully refreshed.

      I often would program myself to sleep for several minutes between classes. This was harder if I was already sleep deprived though.

      I still have a bit of the skill but not much. Mostly I don't have the self-discipline habit to do the walk down into the subconscious state. I like to think I could though, if I put my mind to it.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    6. Re: Neat. by Badblackdog · · Score: 0

      Just smoke a bowl, you will feel much more relaxed.

    7. Re:Neat. by garyebickford · · Score: 0

      Yep, that's it. Thanks! :)

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    8. Re:Neat. by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Nieztche probably isn't the best example. Its beyond doubt he was a brilliant philosopher. He was also completely and utterly mad as well. The guy had crippling mental illness (Possibly from Syphilis) and as a result I'm not sure its wise to draw too many conclusions from his behavior or even his claims about his behavior.

      That said, he did one of his greatest things whilst suffering from his madness, wrote an entire book about how his good friend Wagner (the composer) was an antisemetic nationalist bastard who shouldn't be trusted as far as he could be thrown. Its a hell of a way to end a friendship but god damn it was he right. Wagner, of course wrote many of the texts that inspired Hitlers cataclysmic rise. (So next time you hear someone blame nieztche, tell em to rack off. Nieztche actually admired the jews for what he believed was their sense of self preservation and deeply disliked anti-semetism and "slave morality". His sister altered many of his writings and twisted his words once niztche was so incapacitated he had no more recourse to retaliate. But it CAN be said Wagner really did have his intended influence. Heck the Wagner family where one of the earliest funders of the nazis).

      MASSIVE DERAIL but forgive me, I do like my philosphical history.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    9. Re:Neat. by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Nietzche was just one example from an interesting book, "The Creative Process", originally published in the 1960s IIRC - apparently it's still in print. It's a collection of 50 essays by well-known thinkers including Nietzche and Einstein, I was just paraphrasing from long-ago memory. Most/all of the essays involve that plateau-leap-plateau-leap cycle of creativity. So it's not just him.

      WRT the Nazi collection, another book points out something interesting - another philosopher that was "adopted" by the Nazis was Max Weber, whose work was not at all supportive of the Nazi world view but whose works could be used by them. According to Alan Bloom ("The Closing of the American Mind"), Weber's work was all the rage, but completely misunderstood, among the European socialists of the 1930s. His work and terminology was turned inside out and most of the original meaning stripped out, and then was brought over to the US and adopted by the folks who taught in American schools of education in the 1940s and 1950s, where it was taught to the budding new teachers who taught them to us Boomers in the 1950s and 1960s. So it turns out that many of the "grand new ideas" of the 1960s were not new, were not grand, and were in fact empty phrases from the socialists of the 1930s whose meanings had been inverted from what Max Weber originally meant. And now here we are.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    10. Re:Neat. by badzilla · · Score: 0

      Thanks found and bought a used copy very cheap, 4 quid delivered to UK.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    11. Re:Neat. by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Cool. I'm thinking of buying a new copy myself - I lost mine some years ago due to a basement flood.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    12. Re:Neat. by lissnup · · Score: 1

      Nietzche wrote about having had disabling migraines for a year, until one night he went for a walk, and on the top of a mountain the entire text of "Thus Spake Zarathrustra" came to him all at once, and he went home and copied it down.

      Did the migraines stop after he wrote the text?

    13. Re:Neat. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      So you posted this to show that you either don't understand defragmenting or the article?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  4. Like so many computer programs... by christianT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Humans suffer from major memory leaks and must be shut down periodically due to poor garbage collection.

    1. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Yaur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think its shutting down, so much a suspending all of the threads while the GC runs.

    2. Re:Like so many computer programs... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Humans suffer from major memory leaks and must be shut down periodically due to poor garbage collection.

      Except for C programmers who can go on and on without any apparent performance deterioration.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspending threads? Maybe for you, but most of us get to run environmental simulations without IO bandwidth issues (mostly, a few senses are still feeding in, but that's just to maintain a proper "wake on crisis" functionality)

      Side question: has anyone else ever attained full REM while awake? It's really interesting have two channels of input for some of your senses. I counted 5 dreams that night, although since I was awake, they only ran in realtime.

    4. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they think so ...

    5. Re: Like so many computer programs... by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A few rare people can achieve a REM-like state while awake. I am one of them. In my case, I learned to do it due to having a lifelong hereditary sleep disorder. Going without sleep for up to five days is a common occurrence. I enter a trance state and begin to dream. I have more control over these dreams than during normal sleep but, I am mostly unaware of my environment though it is not hard to snap me out of it. I'm aware enough that if my name is called or someone touches me, I come out of it. On rare occasions, the dream state does not end right away and I have both stimuli at the same time. It is awkward but, navigateable. The state give me most of but, not all of the benefits of real sleep. My mind responds as if rested, it stops dulusions that occur because of sleep loss and the general mental slowdown that naturally occurs. What it doesn't do is some of the more complex physical cleaning that the body does when you sleep such as clearing substance P from your pain receptors. As I have fibromyalgia, this last point is very relevant.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    6. Re: Like so many computer programs... by ruir · · Score: 0

      A girl in slashdot, is that possible? ;-P

    7. Re: Like so many computer programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Try anti-depressants and SSRI's.

      It's no coincidence that "fibromyalgia" basically only affects crazy women.

      Wow...they start taking their meds and amazingly enough it soon clears up.

      Funny that.

      Fibromyalgia is the latest in bullshit conditions to have......when the underlying cause is you have mental health issues.

    8. Re: Like so many computer programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychotherapy also works.
      For the same underlying reason *cuckoo cuckoo*

    9. Re: Like so many computer programs... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      A girl in slashdot, is that possible? ;-P

      You're dreaming.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    10. Re: Like so many computer programs... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I think I may experience something similar. I sometimes go 3-4 days without being able to sleep, which is very disturbing and makes it extremely difficult to function. But often when I am trying to sleep but unable to, I experience near-dreamlike states, sort of like intense daydreaming, but with the occasional awareness of being awake and of anything else that might be going on. I have "both sets of stimuli" as you put it. I can get up and go to the bathroom without interrupting it. These *also* happen during the day. I can prevent them with great difficulty at times when it's vital to do so (while driving, cooking, taking care of kids) but if I'm at work with little to do and just staring at a screen, it's almost impossible. People interpret it as "sleeping with his eyes open." I can't really "direct" these dreamlike states even though I'm aware of them. (I am sometimes aware of being in an actual, sleeping dream, and can't direct those either. I tend to wake up if I try.) But here is the difference: this state is nowhere near sufficient to enable me to function. It's probably better than if it didn't exist at all, but it isn't, for me anyway, close to being a substitute for real sleep. I have severe problems with short-term memory, coordination, concentration, and cognition. All of these improve during periods when I'm able to sleep occasionally and worsen during periods when I can't.

    11. Re: Like so many computer programs... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      How is this different from being a light sleeper?

      --
      I come here for the love
    12. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew getting those few Java programming jobs on the side will be bad for me, I'd never consider it would cause long term sleep pattern changes...

    13. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      And once again, JAVA fixes the problem!

      --
      -
    14. Re:Like so many computer programs... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      It's part of dreaming awake. It's been in use by esoteric societies for millenia. It's only a small stepping stone to the interesting stuff though.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  5. Sleep at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's the reason why I sleep at work

  6. Interesting Thoughts by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    "During sleep, the Cerebrospinal fluid fills channels in the brain"

    So the "wet dream" is all in your head.......

    1. Re:Interesting Thoughts by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I had a problem with that line: the ventricles of the brain are ALWAYS full of that fluid. That's what they take during a spinal tap. You don't need to be asleep for that.

    2. Re:Interesting Thoughts by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I had a problem with that line: the ventricles of the brain are ALWAYS full of that fluid. That's what they take during a spinal tap. You don't need to be asleep for that.

      Although you may prefer to be...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    3. Re:Interesting Thoughts by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I had a problem with that line: the ventricles of the brain are ALWAYS full of that fluid. That's what they take during a spinal tap. You don't need to be asleep for that.

      According to Wikipedia, spinal tap involves taking fluid from the spine in the lower back area, not brain. Why would having fluid there imply that the same fluid is also present in the brain at the same time?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:Interesting Thoughts by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. I wasn't really thinking there, must have been lack of sleep. It does show that the fluid is always present in the central nervous system I suppose. And the brain ventricles are contiguous with the central canal of the spinal cord. But I don't actually know if that is connected with the area that spinal taps are done in and I couldn't immediately find anything suggesting they are connected. I'm pretty sure they are: it's used to determine if someone has meningitis, which affects the brain. If they were seperate compartments, you couldn't rely on bacteria being in both of them.

      I guess I should have just said the ventricles always have CSF in them and not mentioned the spinal tap, sorry about that.

    5. Re:Interesting Thoughts by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      The fact that they called the fluid Cerebral-Spinal fluid might give you a little insight into your question.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  7. Couldn't you come up... by Arkiel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...with a better word than "brainwashing?" Since that already means something that does not match the contents of the article.

    1. Re:Couldn't you come up... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of science articles published in a day. Most titles, a given scientist is only going to glance at them once. The journal and the authors have an interest in making it memorable.

      It's not like researchers are going so far as to pay for advertising their papers.

    2. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The paper is called "Sleep Drives Metabolite Clearance from the Adult Brain". The Slashdot title is the misleading one. Scientists don't generally use sensationalist headlines.

    3. Re:Couldn't you come up... by GrandCow · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...with a better word than "brainwashing?" Since that already means something that does not match the contents of the article.

      BEEP BOOP I am a robot can't detect a joke.

      Brainwashing is a perfect word to use here since that's exactly what's happening.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Couldn't you come up... by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...with a better word than "brainwashing?" Since that already means something that does not match the contents of the article.

      Agree. A "dirty mind" joke would have gone down far better.

    6. Re:Couldn't you come up... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      ...with a better word than "brainwashing?" Since that already means something that does not match the contents of the article.

      BEEP BOOP I am a robot can't detect a joke.

      Brainwashing is a perfect word to use here since that's exactly what's happening.

      "brainwashing" != "brain washing". And I don't think it was that the OP didn't get the pun, it's just that the pun was crap. As I said above, I would have gone with a pun on "dirty mind" if it was my headline.

    7. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a bit of a joke, you see. By using term that already means something to mean something else, and to do it in a way that can't possibly cause confusion in anyone but the dimmest of illiterates, the author added a bit of zest to the story.

    8. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They decided to mess with Google and their search engine customers.

    9. Re:Couldn't you come up... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The slashdot title is taken from the preview article from Science, the second of the two links. I see that the staff writer of that doesn't appear to be a professional scientist, but I have definitely run into scientists using catchy titles.

    10. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to introduce you to the novel and totally never seen before writer's stylistic figure of "pun".

    11. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom would go down faster - a dirty mind

    12. Re:Couldn't you come up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's just that the pun was crap.

      BEEP BOOP! I am a robot. I have no sense of humor. Must suppress humor in others.

    13. Re:Couldn't you come up... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      it's just that the pun was crap.

      BEEP BOOP! I am a robot. I have no sense of humor. Must suppress humor in others.

      I like how you edited out my joke so you make your point without looking like a dick. That was clever.

      (Do you need the sarcasm pointed out to you or can you get it yourself?)

    14. Re:Couldn't you come up... by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Well, not quite. "brainwashing" has a specific meaning, and is very different from the act of "brain washing" which is what this article is about.

      One is actually washing the brain, the other is warping ones thinking internally.

  8. Windows by Phoeniyx · · Score: 2

    So that's where Bill Gates got the idea about having to reboot Windows every day back when. It's really a form of cleaning the computer. It's good for the system, don't ya know.

    1. Re:Windows by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Great, now the extreme overclockers will be replacing the liquid in their cooling rigs with cerebrospinal fluid.

    2. Re:Windows by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      THAT IS A GREAT IDEA FOR A BOOK/MOVIE!

      You should get to it before someone else does... I'm thinking something along the lines of Larry Niven's body banks... or the premise of the (terrrible) Repo Men

    3. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      serial experiments lain is kind of like that.

    4. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people on Slashdot never understood that when "Windows" is mentioned without qualification it implies "desktop" not server. For desktops, uptime longer than 12 hours doesn't really matter. Even uptime of 4 hours would be OK since you have to go to lunch anyway. As long as your work was saved it's all good. Of course it's nice to have longer uptimes; but it wasn't a priority compared to having a responsive GUI.

      Now it's interesting to think that we humans consider our selves evolved, we consider ourselves more sophisticated and important than a Linux box... and we reboot every day.

      So of course Windows was tied to human rhythms in some ways in this regard; of course Windows is stupid and evil though... uh-huh. Yeah. Whatever.

  9. This explains much, and has been known for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why our sensory inputs (sight, hearing in particular) are mostly cut off during this time. If not periodically cut off, the "noise" starts erasing more permanent memories, causing hallaucinations, etc. (Look up effects of sleep deprivation.) It's a cybernetic quandary; the only way the brain can protect itself from erasure is to periodically stop all inputs.

  10. Re:This explains much, and has been known for a wh by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    It's a cybernetic quandary; the only way the brain can protect itself from erasure is to periodically stop all inputs.

    Sounds like a hard drive I had once...

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  11. It Also by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Gives to time to better process and analyse the data that you collected during the day. Most of what you learn, you learn in your sleep, while unconscionably looking over the stuff that you just did not get while awake, distracted by all the other input going on.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:It Also by Falconhell · · Score: 0

      I have noticed when I learn to play a new musical piece, it takes a nights sleep before I can play it well.

  12. Night is dark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save for sex, most of those activities we aren't very good at in the dark. It's probably more efficient for us to save energy by sleeping, and actually act during daylight. To me, this is the most persuasive basic reason for sleep.

    1. Re:Night is dark by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong. As Bowie put it "Don't forget to turn on the light Don't laugh Babe, it'll be alright"

  13. Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A higher order species that has brains that can "cleans" itself without requiring sleep would have so much evolutionary advantage that they would rapidly take over the entire planet (sort of like flowering plants). Why hasn't 3+ billion years of evolutionary produced such a species?

    1. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A higher order species that has brains that can "cleans" itself without requiring sleep would have so much evolutionary advantage that they would rapidly take over the entire planet (sort of like flowering plants). Why hasn't 3+ billion years of evolutionary produced such a species?

      Um... hello? Are you just not aware of corporate America and the seemingly prevalent idea that you can just overwork people to death to squeeze out a few extra bucks for the shareholders? The key idea here is that eventually the "to death" part will be minimized once the riffraff suffer enough breakdowns and kill themselves off, leaving us with the highly-evolved emotionless automatons whose need for sleep decreases every generation...

    2. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by h2oboi89 · · Score: 1

      Well dolphins and a few other animals do 1/2 their brains at a time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unihemispheric_slow-wave_sleep#Species_exhibiting_USWS). Just because a feature is "better" does not guarantee something will come along with it and prosper. Evolution works along the lines of "good enough" and so far this particular feature has not caught on in a species capable of taking over from humans.

    3. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's advantages and disadvantages to every evolutionary option. It's not clear that not sleeping is a very large advantage.

      Sure, it means being active for an additional 8 hours a day. But being active also means needing more food. Being active all night in a time before artificial light means more injuries. It also means missing out on the social effects of sleeping - "sleeping together", even without sex, reinforces relationships.

    4. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Imagine reason waking up and finding out what the right brain has been up to. Every day or so.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We, sleeping creatures are "lucky"* that by "coincidence" the day is divided in two parts so different that an animal well adapted to one of them don't fare very well on the other. So, most animals adapt to one of those parts, and just protect themselves the best way they can at the other. For nearly all animals, being awake wouldn't make much of a difference.

      * Lucky that we adapted to exactly the environment that we evolved on. What a coincidence, isn't it?

    6. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      There'd probably be a huge overhead to doing this kind of thing while awake. Enough to make it completely impractical. Also, evolution doesn't tend toward perfect, it only tends toward "lives long enough to have children."

    7. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, sleepless animals sounds like a very high-tier evolutionary stage that would require a decent amount of time to develop.
      I think we might have seen more of it if the dino-asteroid never happened, but at the moment only a few species have developed the stages that would end up with sleepless animals given the time. (h20boi89 linked that below)
      Plus, we wouldn't be here.

      Same goes for other things, such as heartless anima... oh wait we have that, lawyers.
      But really, animals with no single heart, but either more hearts or something else, such as some muscle structure in a major arter[y/ies] that cycles in the same way.
      Think of humans, those 2 fats things in the neck, 2 muscles on each side cycles it in and out (same direction as it is now), sounds simpler, right?
      Wonder why it never evolved like that and instead became the organ we currently have. I'd assume because it is closer to the lungs. (only going on humans for that though)
      Admittedly our necks would probably be 1.5-2 times thicker. Great if you have a thing for necks.
      But on the upside we now have TWO full-sized lungs! AWE!

    8. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You've mixed that up with "Logan's Run".

    9. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      One reason that many predators sleep so much is to conserve energy so that they don't have to hunt so often. Cats, of course, are just one of the more extreme examples.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      As city-based life becomes more global and the lights are on all the time, it seems plausible that some humans and their associated animals (cats?) might go toward some form of continuous wakefulness - as it is now, some stock traders are essentially living 24 hour lives, taking cat naps every so often. And I have read that there are a few people (I think a few dozen in the US) who indeed never sleep, so the gene profile is out there. There is still the problem of reproduction - how many kids are stock traders likely to have?

      Another subgroup that might show this evolutionary change over time would be those who in the future live in Space, where the time is almost entirely arbitrary. If one lives in a habitat that spins on its axis every few minutes to simulate gravity, and revolves around the Earth with a period that could be from every 90 minutes to every month or more, depending on the orbital height, then maintaining a 24 hour-based schedule would only be advantageous for keeping up with friends on a particular Earthly location, and there would be advantages to not needing to sleep.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    11. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sleeping together", even without sex, reinforces relationships.

      Pointless to me.

    12. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Sitting in the dark gets boring.

      Now we have electricity and can have light and entertainment 24/7. I find it likely that within the next 100 years, it will be common and possibly healthy to have 4 hours or less sleep a night.

    13. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A higher order species that has brains that can "cleans" itself without requiring sleep would have so much evolutionary advantage that they would rapidly take over the entire planet (sort of like flowering plants). Why hasn't 3+ billion years of evolutionary produced such a species?

      Funny that you'd ask a question and include a perfectly valid answer. Plantlife is indeed a good example, bacteria and fungi being others. All of them took over the entire planet.

      "Higher order" is an entirely subjective concept so I won't go into that, but it seems to me that a large nervous center needs a process like sleep to keep working. The way to get rid of sleep is not to get "better brains", but to get rid of them altogether. After all plants, fungi and bacteria are doing just fine without them - better than us by a lot of standards.

      The fact that brainy creatures evolved after them seems to indicate that there is enough evolutionary advantage to having a more complex nervous center to offset for the disadvantage of having to sleep though.

    14. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Endlisnis · · Score: 1

      If by "100 years", you mean, "100,000 years", then I might agree with you. Evolution takes a LONG time, unless you mean that we will invent some sort of treatment that will reduce your sleep requirements.

    15. Re:Evolutionary pressure to not sleep? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      A higher order species that has brains that can "cleans" itself without requiring sleep would have so much evolutionary advantage that they would rapidly take over the entire planet (sort of like flowering plants). Why hasn't 3+ billion years of evolutionary produced such a species?

      Obviously because the advantages of sleep outweigh the disadvantages. Evolution is very tidy that way, and there is no such thing as a "higher order" species -- merely one better adapted to its niche. The very notion is simply humanocentrism. We can hardly compete with the humble tardigrade for adaptability, for example.

      It's interesting to note that as far as we know, all animals sleep. Some give it up for certain periods in their life (e.g. migrating birds, baby orcas & dolphins), and some do it with half a brain at a time (e.g. dolphins & orcas again), but none avoid it their entire lives. Even ants sleep.

      It would be interesting to see if all animals have channels like these. If so, then this may represent a fundamental need that all creatures with a central nervous system need. It would be interesting to see if animals without one (e.g. sponges & jellyfish) sleep too. Interestingly, it seems that the latter do sleep.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  14. Re:Sleep is for wimps. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    If you can learn to compose well-written proposals and stay relatively positive, you can always do contracting (assuming you have skills that are in demand). Take a look at Guru.com. You'll be bidding against third world countries, but you wouldn't want the sort of employer that would hire them anyway, and there are ones looking for quality over cost.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  15. Very happy with these findings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, even a short nap instantly improves how you feel, anywhere from 5-15 minutes.
    And even through the day, a full sleep cycle of 90 minutes at various times instead of one huge monophasic sleep cycle more or less works the same since you naturally wake up around 100 minutes if there is activity going around you or it is bright enough. (sure has worked that way for me since, uh, 13-ish when I started doing it, now double that age with a birthday in 2 days, towards wizardhood)
    And more and more they are finding this out as research is done in to split-sleep cycles, which is great, I don't want to end up with triple alzheimer's by the time I am 30 through some stealth ninja problem. Oh well, doing science, etc. I will post my findings on death.

    I dunno though, the biology behind it is sound, humans naturally tend to be multi-phasic in sleep throughout early life, and many around the world still practice it (including the Spanish Siesta, one of the more known traditions based around it)
    But modern society has forced this single long sleep for many reasons, such as saving on travel time / costs to keep workers in the workplace for a longer period.
    Although there was actually something recently looking in to the revival of on-site homes and accommodation for staff in many places, Facebook just recently joining in on it.
    Sounded pretty reasonable that the brain does some maintenance and clean-up since a lot of gunk must pile up through those trillions upon trillions of interactions that happen constantly to keep you up and about.
    The brain is just like a muscle, the more and harder you use it, gotta stretch it and flex it, then give it a nice cooldown time before using it again.

    My usual pattern is a 4-5 hour sleep from 5am and 100 minute nap at around 3pm-ish. Occasionally I do 3, depends what I am doing.
    I also meditate too, which only really happened a few years after, which helped even more.
    Never turned me in to a vegetable either, pretty high IQ (useless number) and great grades in school for the most part. (hated French)

    So don't skip in your sleep, split it up if you need to. Just don't do that silly polyphasic sleep nonsense, you need at least 90 minutes a nap and at least 3 of those in a day as far as we know. Well, you can do it for limited periods, just don't do it long term, that crap builds up in your head and all it takes is the right conditions for it to become a chain reaction of hard plaque and slow death.
    Shine brighter, die quicker, something about tears and rain. Don't bank on science curing things, it might not.

    1. Re:Very happy with these findings by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I mean, even a short nap instantly improves how you feel, anywhere from 5-15 minutes.

      Not everyone responds well to short naps. I don't. I know I'm no alone. ...not simply trying to be contrary, just saying that short naps aren't for everyone.

    2. Re:Very happy with these findings by ledow · · Score: 1

      When tired, sleep.
      When hungry, eat.
      When thirsty, drink.
      When in pain, don't mask the pain - find the cause.

      Our bodies are self-sustaining machines based on multi-million-year-old designs that have been specifically chosen for their ability to detect, avoid and cope with dangers.

      We're not perfect but, pretty much, the body knows exactly what it needs at any given time (there are instances where, if you ignore the warning signs, fight through, and you're close to destruction, the body will "flip" and want you to do stupid things - hypothermia is a good example here - but they are the exception rather than the rule). If you want an extreme example, watch pregnancy "cravings" - the body knows it needs some crap it's never needed in such proportions before, detects it in food (or other materials), and MAKES you want to eat it.

      Telling people they need to sleep X amount of times or for X hours or whatever is just as ridiculous as spouting that we "need" 3 square meals a day (look into the history of that - it's a modern invention). Ancient documents almost all refer to "the second sleep" (i.e. people waking up in the middle of the night, even when artificial illumination was sparse and expensive, and doing things, then going back to bed) but that doesn't mean we should force our bodies to do what they don't want to do.

      What we've done is taught ourselves to fight our bodies. We "need" to stay awake to go to work and perform against a rigorous and inflexible timetable set down by tradition. When we can't sleep, we force ourselves to try and frustrate our bodies and others rather than just getting up and doing what needs to be done. We've taught ourselves to wait until lunch/dinnertime to eat for fear of being "odd", and to then have a certain size meal (and then pig out on high-energy snacks in the meantime to fulfill our rumbling bellies).

      We have conditioned our children to "stop running" (pretty much our primary genetic body advantage, that we have abandoned in modern life) and adults spend their lives walking and then have to perform an organised exercise to give that kind of boost to our bodies (and do you not feel good AFTER such an exertion because your body was craving it?) and we've taught ourselves to mask pain and discomfort wherever it strikes.

      Not saying that we shouldn't do some things (i.e. basic hygiene and toilet-training, etc.) but we don't listen to our bodies any more.

      When you hurt your ankle, keep your weight off it. Why? Because it hurts. If that starts to make your hips hurt, take it easy rather than forcing your body into pain. Don't tank up on painkillers "because you need to go to work/school" and make yourself walk on it. It hurts for a damn good reason, and we can't turn off pain for a damn good reason (admittedly, sometimes that goes wrong, but we know about those conditions and can detect and treat them as best we can).

      There is no "rule" to keeping a human alive except "give it what it craves". You can go too far in the modern world (e.g. obesity, overindulgence, addiction, etc.) but that's also why we have a brain. To say "Hold on, this is wrong."

      It's "wrong" to tell anyone how much sleep they "should be getting" (some people do only need 3 hours, others 12 or more, and it's not for anyone to force them otherwise), the same way that there is crap that my nation's health departments push such as "5 fruit/vegetables a day" (the recommendation is different in every country), "X glasses of water a day" (unnecessary - drink when thirsty unless you suffer from a very rare condition), etc. are there to encourage people not to over-indulge, not because it's a minimum requirement to sustain life. The whole vitamin / supplement industry is also preying on this social factor too (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24563590).

      Do what your body asks of you.

  16. newss to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all this time i thought the blood cells took waste away from the brain cells to the kidneys. I learned something new today. thanks for posting

    1. Re:newss to me by camperdave · · Score: 1

      and all this time i thought the blood cells took waste away from the brain cells to the kidneys. I learned something new today. thanks for posting

      There's also lymph - the forgotten circulatory system.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. So that is why naps are so good! by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    Mid-day sweeping keeps the cobwebs out.

  18. More pseudo science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People get handsome grants to 'study' the mind, and regardless of the value of anything they 'discover' they need to publish papers to keep that money flowing.

    Here's the REAL state of science in this field. We do not have the FAINTEST idea why many Earth creatures evolved a sleep mechanism. Showing the downsides of sleep deprivation is NOT a proof of why we have a sleep mechanism. Clearly, the brain no more needs a regular 'cool down' period than do the other organs of the body.

    TRUE science is partly the concept of knowing clearly the things we do not yet understand. Betas find this aspect of scientific theory baffling.

    Mechanistic attempts to understand sleep are bad science- full stop. We are conscious. We think. We give meaning to the Universe. Concepts that fit badly with the mechanisms that underpin standard scientific methods. Logically, it would be obvious to most rational people that sleep links to who and what we are, as conscious entities. The best scientists NEVER had/have an issue with this 'spiritual' dimension. Much poorer scientists think the denial of self brings scientific 'kudos' and legitimacy, and thus attempt to turn people into "logs".

    Sadly, America has a long history of studying the mechanisms of things like sleep for VERY evil purposes. To find new ways of torturing Humans. To find ways to make soldiers more murderous, and less prone to fatigue. To allow the under-classes to work multiple jobs, with reduced sleep patterns (the drugs Americans have gotten over-the-counter since before the 1950s to allow them to sleep less are almost unknown in other nations).

    An ordinary person, with no formal science training, could list all kinds of potential advantages of the sleep mechanism. Their POV is "top down" of course, a way of thinking that low quality scientists are VERY poor at. Crappy scientists are almost always "bottom-up only" thinkers.

  19. A True "Sleeping" Pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Find a drug that accelerates this process.
    2. Profit!
    Yeah, skip the '?' step. What would you pay for a pill that would let you wake up after a couple of hours, feeling like you had a full night's sleep?

    1. Re:A True "Sleeping" Pill by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      A lot(tm).

      There's a fantastic return on that, since it effectively increases my lifespan by 30%.

  20. I've seen the defragging happen by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember how Defrag in Windows 98 used to move the little colored blocks around? One night I got more or less the same thing. When I was about 11, several years before Windows 95 existed, I dreamed I walked into an M/E Root Beer restaurant (apparently a fictional counterpart of A&W restaurants) and in the back room, an anthropomorphic rabbit was sorting a bunch of pieces of paper with pictures on them into various piles. I looked at a few of them, and they appeared to be my memories.

    1. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by melikamp · · Score: 1
    2. Re: I've seen the defragging happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a movie if I ever heard one.

    3. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by Unkl_Shvelven · · Score: 2

      If you want a little bit of that nostalgia back you can install Piriform's Defraggler, which retains the sorting-blocks interface. And, it's free.

      --
      regular man whom love computer (Also, fuck beta).
    4. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by richlv · · Score: 1

      i literary spat on the keyboard. well done, fairly fucked up mental image :)

      --
      Rich
    5. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      an anthropomorphic rabbit

      Was he called Frank? This doesn't bode well.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Defragging has been around a lot longer than Windows. Wiki says Vopt is "one of the oldest" defraggers and cites a 1992 article. Vopt is from Golden Bow systems who have perhaps the most keep-off-my-lawn web site in the history of old craggy things. [I loved Vopt. You can get a free trial if ya want.]

      --
      I come here for the love
    7. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Ok, I originally was going to write "longer than Windows 9.x", and probably should have. Anyway, I fired off an email to Golden Bow to ask them when they first came out with Vopt. The sun has barely come up in CA so "I'll be back".

      --
      I come here for the love
    8. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Copy II+ for the apple ii had bad sector marking and I believe defragging in 1981-2.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    9. Re:I've seen the defragging happen by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Good point. A little mind boggling how small the gain would be from defragging a floppy, but still.

      --
      I come here for the love
  21. Dreams are calibration patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still convinced that dreams are artifacts of calibration routines, and only race conditions allow you to remember them.

    1. Re:Dreams are calibration patterns by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Please explain how I remember my dreams more than reality.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  22. False. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faux News is.

  23. So, if you're inhuman by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    And wish to engage in brainwashing of your own, how should sleep deprivation feature in your... um... "protocol"?

  24. Modafinil by sjames · · Score: 1

    What does this imply for the idiots who figure they can just replace most or all of their sleep with Modafinil? I'm guessing there are going to be a few sad stories in the future.

    1. Re:Modafinil by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      Drugs like moda. are most effective when one has slept well.

    2. Re:Modafinil by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

      I'm hoping someone comes up with a power flush technique like with oil or transmission oil changes at Jiffy Lube. Step into a booth, plug in, five minutes later you're good to go another twenty four hours... or twenty three hours and fifty five minutes.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  25. When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...since humans first evolved..."

    What does that mean, exactly? When was the first offfspring or set of offspring born where they said "Ah! This is different. This is a human!"

  26. Eventually the engine cracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you have to either do a complete overhaul or discard the unit.

  27. Sleep: Why We Need It and What Happens Without It by prasadsurve · · Score: 1

    Scishow video about Sleep
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwNMvUXTgDY

  28. Re:This explains much, and has been known for a wh by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Quick! Throw it in the freezer!

  29. omelette du fromage anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. short sleepers by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    I've run into a few people who always brag about only needing a few hours sleep every night.
    I've always sort of thought they were full of waste products.

    1. Re:short sleepers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just jealous because i can spend more time having sex and accumulating wealth.

    2. Re:short sleepers by psithurism · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because i can spend more time having sex and accumulating wealth.

      Yes, I am. Especially, because you can, but instead you are calling me at 4:00am to brag about how you only need a few hours of sleep and complain that everyone is being so boring right now.

  31. In short, you're killing yourself. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're possibly setting yourself up for Alzheimer's. It's been known for a long time that buildup of amyloid plaques is worsened by lack of sleep and vice versa. (Sleep issues show up long before other symptoms of Alzheimer's). This provide a mechanism by showing how the plaques are regularly removed by good sleep.

    For extra fun, sleep is also when myelin-repairing oligodendrocytes kick into gear. You probably won't develop MS from not sleeping, but it isn't good for your long-term health, as that function is necessary to the survival of brain cells. This impacts mood, memory, and moral judgement.

    Oh, and then there's the fact that lack of sleep disrupts the ratio of leptin and ghrelin in your body, making you far hungrier when awake. This is part of the reason that lack of sleep is correlated with obesity. You also have lower testosterone (impacting your virility) & higher cortisol levels (wrecking your memory and weakening your immune system). Other hormone changes put you at higher risks of type 2 diabetes.

    In short, you're killing yourself. Seek help if this isn't voluntary. Prioritize getting more sleep.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:In short, you're killing yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be crazy (no pun) but my AD's seem to lose strength after I take naps. Not the antidepressant part, but the half life (effexor) seems shorter and I start getting brain zaps that are common when I miss a dose. Might this be because sleep removes the chemicals more quickly?

  32. There have been a few people who dont sleep at all by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    How to explain those folks?

    (Google it yourself)

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  33. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The brain may clean itself while sleeping, but I hypothesize that it can do it while processing sensory input, and sleep does much more than clean the brain. BTW, the only observation we have of our "ancient" relatives is that they're dead. Who knows what they devoted their time to exactly.

  34. So if sleep is the cleaning process... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... than is a dream a testing stage? Does our brain first flush our brain canals and then checks if everything went right by firing up designated memory pathways?

  35. good scheme if you can get it! by guygo · · Score: 1

    Sure. garbage collection. all good RTEs do it. makes a ton of sense to do it when the body can afford to spare the energy. do Vulcans sleep?

  36. accumulating wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gathering food, accumulating wealth, or having sex

    One of these things is not like the others. Food and sex are biological imperatives. Accumulating wealth is not essential to life and is not something that every person does. The inclusion of wealth in this list indicates that the writer of TFS is a pathologically greedy person.

    1. Re:accumulating wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writer of TFS is writer of TFA is a woman. A woman equates wealth with food and sex. No surprises here.

  37. It's an adaptation by gregor-e · · Score: 1

    In our evolutionary past, we had to specialize in order to be competitive in a particular niche. That specialization prevented our earliest forbears from being competitive in the radically changed environments of both day and night. So all the way back in the evolutionary tree to bacteria, we see a circadian rhythm. Some creatures are better adapted to night, others to day. They spend their off-cycle conserving energy and being difficult to spot. Holding still accomplishes both. So sleeping became a strong selective advantage. Since sleep is built in at a fundamental level, any later specializations have to be compatible. So brainwashing while we're asleep is a compatible and advantageous adaptation.

  38. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insomniacs are dirty minded.

  39. How is that linked to lucid dreaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that contraproductive, then?

  40. Perhaps that species has already evolved a couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A higher order species that has brains that can "cleans" itself without requiring sleep would have so much evolutionary advantage that they would rapidly take over the entire planet (sort of like flowering plants). Why hasn't 3+ billion years of evolutionary produced such a species?

    Such animals are very tasty with a nice bearnaise sauce, chianti and fava beans.

    Trying to outcompete humans would be like a normal person trying to become one of the 1%. The game's already rigged, the slot's already filled.

  41. Lucid dreaming via Android by badzilla · · Score: 1

    I've been experimenting with Sleep as Android which uses your phone's accelerometer to measure your physical movements and thus your mental state during sleep, When it detects REM sleep it plays an audio loop "you are dreaming". Not managed to do anything exciting in my dreams yet but looks promising to me.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    1. Re:Lucid dreaming via Android by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      try asking complex questions to yourself before sleeping and watch your dreams trying to solve the questions

  42. Re:Sleep: Why We Need It and What Happens Without by AbominousSalad · · Score: 1

    Yeah, posted almost immediately before this story, no less.

    --
    Every trollism an AC posts is prefixed, in my mind, with "A. Coward whined, in a weak and cowardly voice:"
  43. January, 1986 by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    I just heard back from Golden Bow. Vopt first appeared in January, 1986.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:January, 1986 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's old... I miss the VMarkBad util that came with the old DOS version of VOpt; no other bad-sector marking tool was so fast or so accurate. Back when disk space was precious and expensive, I nursed along a number of failing drives using VMarkBad.

      I did find I could crash v5/Win pretty much on demand, which kinda spoiled my trust. :( (Just RClick on the display while it's running. About half the time it would crash.) Seems to be fixed in v7, tho.

      I want a defragger that can sort by date (like the old Norton/Win3x did); this pretty much eliminates chronic fragmentation.

      I want one to defrag my brain by date too; that way maybe I could find stuff in my mental junkpile, instead of having it fall out at random. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:January, 1986 by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      VMarkBad
      .

      There's a blast from the past. Totally agree about how fast it was. Also the best looking while it worked. Reminded me of Spinrite -- certainly the most elegantly beautiful program ever coded in assembler.

      I'm not sure I ever used v5, nor did I ever right-click on it, lol.

      After I install my standard stuff on a new system, I download and run the free trial of Vopt. Then never both defragging it again.

      --
      I come here for the love
    3. Re:January, 1986 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm widely feared as "the beta tester who can break anything" ... partly because I do stuff like rightclick on a defragger display! :)

      VMarkBad was different (and faster) because it condemned a sector as 'bad' for ONE retry. Everything else (including Spinrite, AFAIK) did 5 retries. That made the results more reliable, since it would condemn marginal sectors that were iffy today and might be dead tomorrow, while other tools would let that sector go for now... oops tomorrow! Unfortunately, it was never updated past the FAT16 version. :(

      The most beautiful program ever coded in assembly was Vern Buerg's LIST, so there. :D (And the v6 source was made public domain, but I've lost track of my copy and can't find it online anymore. :(

      That's the other tool I want for my brain, LIST, so I can look inside all my weird thoughts. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:January, 1986 by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      I recall SpinRite being ridiculously thorough (and slow). I would say it tried 20 or 50 times but I don't recall for sure.
      .

      Ok, I just checked wiki's SpinRite page -- up to 2000 times it will try to save data. Mind-boggling, especially compared to DOS's "I tried a few times, can I quit now?"

      I gave up running SpinRite decades ago, around the time when I realized that if there were SpinRite errors then the drive was dying. Still, I wouldn't mind watching a SpinRite video, for old times sake.

      List was good. Also, QEdit. I was also a big fan of the PCMag utilities, the original .com ones you typed in by hand. Typically under 5k (which translated to 15,000 keystrokes for a single .com utility), they were quite brilliant and I still use 3 or 4 of them (on my 32-bit XP main machine) to this day. DR.com, their equivalent of Norton's NC.exe, was just 7k (at least after I PKLited it).

      By the way, how's your lawn? Mine is people-free :-)

      --
      I come here for the love
    5. Re:January, 1986 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There are a few old geezers staggering around my lawn... LIST, I still use every day... I think the oldest thing I still use is WAITN.COM, 1982? and it took Frhed to finally wean me off the old CalTech File Modify hex editor (1985). I never did the type 'em in yourself stuff, tho I PKLited plenty back in the era of 20mb HDs...

      There's a thought: PKLite for brains! :D

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:January, 1986 by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      The whole ZIP concept is wonderful. I would put it in my top 2 or 3 things that computers do that are almost magical. Without it I would have, literally, a million directories. For me there is no better backup program.
      .

      I think programmer/left-brain/asperger types do use PKLite, hence the slight pause before they answer. We have a ten/hundred/thousand word answer for most things and have to parse the closest size to fit the time/attention span constraints of those we are talking to. Pre and post-processing...it is all there. Data would feel right at home with geeks -- I guess this is why he considered Geordi his closest friend.

      FWIW, our dreams are probably the most boring of anyone's.

      --
      I come here for the love