I thought you were a decent person. Now I realize that you really are an ass.
Well I always thought you were an ass. You deliberately behave like one to provoke, which is indistinguishable from being one.
Quite frankly I'm proud to be thought of as an ass by someone like you.
Most people don't take stuff on here seriously, but it appears that you do.
It has nothing to do with with whether the target takes it seriously. Your comments are water off a duck's back to me. It's to do with the attitude of the instigator, an attitude which takes the form of deliberately insulting and attempting to provoke the target for no rational reason. That's not the behaviour of a well-adjusted human being. That sounds to me like the behaviour of someone so starved of attention or anything positive in their own life that they'll stoop to anything just to form some kind of connection, even a toxic or wholly imaginary one (as this would have remained had I never responded).
You obviously have issues, but anyway, I've managed to do exactly what I was trying to do, which was to lure you into a correspondence wherein I could try to hold a mirror up to your actions and see if I might just be able to get you to analyse your own behaviour critically and rationally, and perhaps make you realise that you are not making the world a better place for anyone - because, unlike you, I do try to make the world a better place in my own small way. I didn't expect to succeed, and pretty much assumed I would get the kind of response you've just given, but at least I tried.
While I don't intend to troll you anymore
I think you mean "have realised I can't" rather than "don't intend to" but you just go ahead and spin it whichever you need to to keep feeling like a big person.
and have no intention of replying to you at all any longer
I think it'd be safe to bet that you're really itching to right now, though.
wonkey_monkey is an ass who is incapable of taking a joke.
You're a miserable excuse for a human being who wouldn't know a joke if one punched him in the face. I pity you your presumably worthless existence and hope you will consider doing something about it, rather than continuing to slime your way through life feeding on the provocation of others who have done absolutely nothing to deserve it.
Can someone explain, vaguely, possibly with a car analogy, how they go about determining keys with coil whine? Is it because the same calculations are made over and over as it churns through data encrypting/decrypting it, so after listening long enough some kind of clues can be gathered about what bytes are in the key? I mean, I assume it's not as a simple as listening and going "Ooh, 14.5Khz, that's 0xBE."
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong. When a crazy billionaire Bond villain engineer says we're probably a computer simulation... I have no idea.
Slashdot Mirror
"Windows" is just as incapable of connecting to Gmail as "Linux" is.
I thought you were a decent person. Now I realize that you really are an ass.
Well I always thought you were an ass. You deliberately behave like one to provoke, which is indistinguishable from being one.
Quite frankly I'm proud to be thought of as an ass by someone like you.
Most people don't take stuff on here seriously, but it appears that you do.
It has nothing to do with with whether the target takes it seriously. Your comments are water off a duck's back to me. It's to do with the attitude of the instigator, an attitude which takes the form of deliberately insulting and attempting to provoke the target for no rational reason. That's not the behaviour of a well-adjusted human being. That sounds to me like the behaviour of someone so starved of attention or anything positive in their own life that they'll stoop to anything just to form some kind of connection, even a toxic or wholly imaginary one (as this would have remained had I never responded).
You obviously have issues, but anyway, I've managed to do exactly what I was trying to do, which was to lure you into a correspondence wherein I could try to hold a mirror up to your actions and see if I might just be able to get you to analyse your own behaviour critically and rationally, and perhaps make you realise that you are not making the world a better place for anyone - because, unlike you, I do try to make the world a better place in my own small way. I didn't expect to succeed, and pretty much assumed I would get the kind of response you've just given, but at least I tried.
While I don't intend to troll you anymore
I think you mean "have realised I can't" rather than "don't intend to" but you just go ahead and spin it whichever you need to to keep feeling like a big person.
and have no intention of replying to you at all any longer
I think it'd be safe to bet that you're really itching to right now, though.
wonkey_monkey is an ass who is incapable of taking a joke.
You're a miserable excuse for a human being who wouldn't know a joke if one punched him in the face. I pity you your presumably worthless existence and hope you will consider doing something about it, rather than continuing to slime your way through life feeding on the provocation of others who have done absolutely nothing to deserve it.
Go and make someone's life better for a change.
First 30 seconds, last 30 seconds.
I don't actually have a problem with you at all.
You clearly have a problem of some kind, though. Low self-esteem? Not enough hugs as a child?
I thought it would be funny to give you a hard time
Why would any well-adjusted human being find that funny?
The idea that Samsung is trying is fold-able screens which have a curved separate display in the middle of the fold.
Is that a guess? Because it sounds like a guess.
One of the phones is said to "bend" like a compact. That doesn't necessarily mean separate displays.
The other is said to be a 5" phone which "unfurls" into an 8" display.
And that seems to be about the sum totality of the information available.
That's what my door says, with a smug sense of self satisfaction at the knowledge of a job well done.
As the door closed behind them it became apparent that it did indeed have a satisfied sigh-like quality to it. “Hummmmmmmyummmmmmm ah!” it said...
Aww, thanks, but there was really no need. Like, really.
Oh, now, you're not even trying at all now.
Don't tell me you're getting tired of me already? :(
Also:
Urbanhail's Amber James didn't find Uber's stance on the matter.
She didn't find it? Didn't find it what? Or did she put it down somewhere and forget where?
the hacker will guide it to your sticky collection.
Wait, what are we talking about?
Follow-up question: can someone explain how I got modded "Insightful" for asking a question and specifically demonstrating my lack of knowledge?
How likely is it for a computer to be continuously encrypting/decrypting for an hour with the same key?
Can someone explain, vaguely, possibly with a car analogy, how they go about determining keys with coil whine? Is it because the same calculations are made over and over as it churns through data encrypting/decrypting it, so after listening long enough some kind of clues can be gathered about what bytes are in the key? I mean, I assume it's not as a simple as listening and going "Ooh, 14.5Khz, that's 0xBE."
The Open source implementation Is WEAKER since we now know HOW they perform the DUMMY CALCULATIONS.
Yes, because obviously they were going to perform exactly the same dummy calculations every time in exactly the same place.
Oh, no, wait, not everyone is as dumb as you.
Really? You're using a second-rate sci-fi movie to dismiss UBI?
Do you think the movie would have been made if the plot involved everyone living reasonably comfortable lives?
How about we let people make serious scientific studies of UBI in the real world, and then come back here and tell you if it works?
I thought having a stalker would be a bit more interesting than this, to be honest.
Couldn't you switch it up a bit?
But it's pronounced "Throat Wobbler-Mangrove."
a brand new category of selfie lenses...
Snapchat's selfie lenses...
Snapchat debuted sponsored lenses
its selfie lenses.
Just because they call it a "lens" doesn't you mean you should call it a lens, when it has absolutely nothing to do with lenses.
While on the subject of lenses
You weren't on the subject of lenses. You were on the subject of stupid shitty software filters.
Flat Lens Promises Possible Revolution In Optics
Anyone can promise possible anything...
These are real, and they’re already generating exceptional results.
Great. But no pics of these exceptional results?
People's Republic of North Korea!
Hah. PRoNK.
The Queen'd tell you to learn English, for a start.
What is it about me that you find so fascinating?
So it hums and it honks? Maybe they should wash it once in a while.
Hey, I'm drivin' here!
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
When a crazy billionaire Bond villain engineer says we're probably a computer simulation... I have no idea.