"Proof" is a word that has no basis in anything outside math.
I'm saying your claims are only true for a slim exception of cases, which will always exist with any generalization as with this case and the racist Democrats.
Well, that was in the South, which was run by the democrats back then.
You know, the same democrats who seceded from the country because they wanted to keep their slavery.
The only democrat I know from that era who wan't a racist was JFK who, you know, believed in limited government, limited taxes and (to come full circle) started the Apollo program.
The more space programs the less likely a human is to ever set foot on the moon again.
In other words, the more people are talking about it the less anyone is actually doing it.
The 60's were an unusual time where people believed in Jesus, did what he told them to do, worked as if they were motivated, and cared about each other. When that eroded the government failed to replace it with anything that made any kind of difference.
Anyway, I'm not sure what good a space program will ever do any ordinary person, so I say can it and let people pocket their tax money.
20 years ago the president and speak of the house were focused on the economy and "the end of welfare as we know it".
Clinton was voted the 2nd best president of the 20th century in 1999 (only after Ronald Reagan), extending in some ways the Reagan administration.
After 9/11 investors have been afraid about another terrorist attack plunging the markets, and it doesn't help that W and Obama have vastly expanded the government and regulatory powers.
People don't have sex as much when it is harder to find money. Studies show out of work husbands have less sex than those with jobs. When the economy is bear skirt lengths increase (they vastly increased after the 29' crash).
The Chicago Fire Department -in order to avoid allegations of racism- instituted a written test to determine hiring for the position of Fire Chief. Double blind and all that.
The applicants who passed the test were less likely to be of certain ethnicities so the entire test was ruled to be discriminatory.
You could use Aristotle's function argument to say the can opener "earns" its place in your kitchen drawer because it completes its actions.
Are your qualms with invisible hands (Sartre and Nietchze both accepted freedom/responsibility as athiests) a reflection of your fear that people will start talking about Jesus?
The "we can't innovate because the rich get first dibs" argument is not sailing with the public.
Wealth inequality was held as a top election issue by around 15% of voters. That means a lot of Democrats don't care.
Wealth inequality gets worse the more you start monkeying around with the market. It got worse under W, but no where near as bad as under Obama.
I'd RATHER have wealth inequality because then the people who aren't contributing anything or doing menial work of limited value (pealing potatoes) get LESS than what people are finding new ways to provide for things people are actually willing to pay for.
Slashdot Mirror
And help the tech giants defy the deep state!
Anti-aging technology is not encouraged here. Slashdot posts must only promote eugenics and genocide.
I'm so confused.
.NET devs at my church over 50 who no one will hire.
I keep hearing startups refuse to consider older developers, but then I hear there is more opportunity for them there.
I really have no idea, and any advice for how to navigate age is welcome. I have 2
Do those people get upset about Hillary exonerating pedophiles by manipulating polygraphs?
There are no facts, just opinions. Nietchze
"Proof" is a word that has no basis in anything outside math.
I'm saying your claims are only true for a slim exception of cases, which will always exist with any generalization as with this case and the racist Democrats.
They probably lost it because something weird showed up in the video feed and NASA cut the video link.
Well, that was in the South, which was run by the democrats back then.
You know, the same democrats who seceded from the country because they wanted to keep their slavery.
The only democrat I know from that era who wan't a racist was JFK who, you know, believed in limited government, limited taxes and (to come full circle) started the Apollo program.
The more space programs the less likely a human is to ever set foot on the moon again.
In other words, the more people are talking about it the less anyone is actually doing it.
The 60's were an unusual time where people believed in Jesus, did what he told them to do, worked as if they were motivated, and cared about each other. When that eroded the government failed to replace it with anything that made any kind of difference.
Anyway, I'm not sure what good a space program will ever do any ordinary person, so I say can it and let people pocket their tax money.
That's a quick way to get on a bunch of government watch lists.
The deep government has no problem charging you higher tax rates based on your opinions.
20 years ago the president and speak of the house were focused on the economy and "the end of welfare as we know it".
Clinton was voted the 2nd best president of the 20th century in 1999 (only after Ronald Reagan), extending in some ways the Reagan administration.
After 9/11 investors have been afraid about another terrorist attack plunging the markets, and it doesn't help that W and Obama have vastly expanded the government and regulatory powers.
People don't have sex as much when it is harder to find money. Studies show out of work husbands have less sex than those with jobs. When the economy is bear skirt lengths increase (they vastly increased after the 29' crash).
Only deep government is allowed to leak documents, and it has to be something that helps the last administration.
If it's something that just exposes government over reach or something small like that, it's a security problem.
The Chicago Fire Department -in order to avoid allegations of racism- instituted a written test to determine hiring for the position of Fire Chief. Double blind and all that.
The applicants who passed the test were less likely to be of certain ethnicities so the entire test was ruled to be discriminatory.
You could use Aristotle's function argument to say the can opener "earns" its place in your kitchen drawer because it completes its actions.
Are your qualms with invisible hands (Sartre and Nietchze both accepted freedom/responsibility as athiests) a reflection of your fear that people will start talking about Jesus?
Companies that do that get their lunch eaten by their competitors
Sounds viable, but then I wonder why typescript isn't getting adopted.
I see several companies and frameworks (e.g. Angular 2.0) using typescript, but then devs and/or companies avoid those frameworks.
This article seems to presuppose TypeScript and CoffeeScript are not getting adopted.
Which seems sort of true to me.
I wonder why? And if so, are we stuck with JavaScript?
As a guy who wants to be protected by all the tax dollars we are putting into defense (and some knowledge about missile defense):
I would REALLY rather hit one of those things with SOMETHING other than a virus or a bug.
This is like trying to "protect" yourself from an invasion by having the street signs point in false directions once an invasion happens.
Nice, but not enough.
I thought they were saying the scientists were going to manufacture a new imaginary crisis to bring humanity to its knees.
Guess the AI scientists have some catching up to do.
Hmm ... interesting. Sounds like several things could be depicted that way (e.g. "capitalism").
Sometimes I feel like I'm going through the garbage here, but occasionally there are some nice morsels.
Allow me to borrow a phrase from the media: "distinctions without a difference."
Not Donny. Not aware of who that is. Perhaps a woosh moment on me.
What stack are you in? What age are you?
What about all the Intel, IBM, SoftBank, US Steel, Sprint jobs?
The US makes companies pay for a lot of stupid benefits that people could just buy on their own. Not a problem in other countries.
You can make businesses pay for all kinds of benefits and they will NEVER try to save money by sending jobs overseas.
Oops.
The "we can't innovate because the rich get first dibs" argument is not sailing with the public.
Wealth inequality was held as a top election issue by around 15% of voters. That means a lot of Democrats don't care.
Wealth inequality gets worse the more you start monkeying around with the market. It got worse under W, but no where near as bad as under Obama.
I'd RATHER have wealth inequality because then the people who aren't contributing anything or doing menial work of limited value (pealing potatoes) get LESS than what people are finding new ways to provide for things people are actually willing to pay for.