Better to expose young minds and deal with the consequences, than to try and permanently shield them... At some point, the real world comes knocking. If they already have experience countering obviously terrible ideas involving genocide, then anything less could be taken in stride.
Note that I'm not talking about 4 year olds. I'm talking about kids old enough to be online without supervision. If you don't think the kid can tell apart truth from propaganda, the kid isn't old enough. If said kid doesn't pass the bar and is unsupervised online, then I refer to my previous comment.
If you're concerned that a YouTube video is enough to turn your kid into a Literal Nazi, then I'm concerned both about your parenting skills and your child's ability to reason...
If you think everyone is not 'liberal' enough, I'm pretty sure you're the whacko. If everyone in the world seems insane but you, the more likely scenario is that you're insane.
Neither should have faced more than a fine. Dealing drugs should be as criminal as Apple removing the audio jack. When will this endless war on drugs end so that we may finally deal with things properly? (Properly in this context is handling it as a severe mental health issue)
I'm assuming you've not taken them before. They are the best proxy for determining scholastic aptitude we have. Either make something better or silence yourself because you're not helping.
He doesn't have an African American studies major from what I've been able to find. LinkedIn only shows 3 years at Portland Community College. His summary mentions studying business and film. I'm guessing you found a troll's profile instead of a real one.
Tracking cars is helps but it's not the right solution for them. Instead they should put the chips in their population at birth just in case their cell phone dies or is turned off.
From what it says, the average person is wasting about 20 hours a week mindlessly consuming content. That's about a month and a half of wasted time by the end of the year...
Itâ(TM)s hard tâ(TM)o take youâ(TM)re argument serioâ(TM)usly â(TM)with all reminâ(TM)ders that Apple doesnâ(TM)t give two shits about â(TM)â(TM)interoperabilityâ(TM)â(TM).
... As I learned in grammer school, Ocean currents play a pivotal role is weather. Ocean currents have changed. Ocean currents are not generally been part of the climate models... sigh this is not the place to debate science anymore...
That would seem to me to imply that weather plays a pivotal role in ocean currents. Therefore, your claim boils down to "climate models don't include enough data about currents." That seems like a reasonable claim, so far.
Unfortunately, you completely missed another part of your early education: citations. Where are there "incomplete" models that have you so disgruntled?
Beyond that, show me a model that has currents included in it, then remove the currents. Show me how removing currents affects the results. Until you do that, you've proven nothing to me. Right now you've only stated more accurate models can be made by incorporating more information. Well, duh.
:Sigh:... these high UID kids these days don't know how to debate science anymore...
Once again, msmash, you're doing it wrong. The person saying the thing goes before the colon, and what they're saying goes after.
Pretty sure that msmash is a special needs or quota based hire. He/she/it has as much grasp of the English language as a man understands menstrual or birthing pains. For someone so inept at its job, I can't think of another explanation for not firing it.
I still stand my argument that if your business offers enough money (and stability), you'll eventually have more than enough recruits. My suspicion is that your HR department is what's fscking you over? Is that the case?
Slashdot Mirror
Note that I'm not talking about 4 year olds. I'm talking about kids old enough to be online without supervision. If you don't think the kid can tell apart truth from propaganda, the kid isn't old enough. If said kid doesn't pass the bar and is unsupervised online, then I refer to my previous comment.
If you're concerned that a YouTube video is enough to turn your kid into a Literal Nazi, then I'm concerned both about your parenting skills and your child's ability to reason...
Next time pan the camera left to show the payday loan store next door, or pan the other way to show the liquor store. /s
No. NASA should be damn proud of what they've still been able to accomplish despite political bullshit attacking them since the Apollo days.
If you think everyone is not 'liberal' enough, I'm pretty sure you're the whacko. If everyone in the world seems insane but you, the more likely scenario is that you're insane.
That's not very inclusive. Other things are wet. Do you need re-education?
Too bad we can't mod things as insightful and hilarious...
Neither should have faced more than a fine. Dealing drugs should be as criminal as Apple removing the audio jack. When will this endless war on drugs end so that we may finally deal with things properly? (Properly in this context is handling it as a severe mental health issue)
I'm assuming you've not taken them before. They are the best proxy for determining scholastic aptitude we have. Either make something better or silence yourself because you're not helping.
In the pursuit of skin color (but not ideological) diversity, they've throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Aren't the cops and their vendors violating the DMCA by hacking into Apple's phones?
Obviously we just need to build a bunch of 6" stilts to raise all buildings along the coast. Done.
Now I'm off to disprove this globe earth thing with my lawn chair and 45 helium balloons.
He doesn't have an African American studies major from what I've been able to find. LinkedIn only shows 3 years at Portland Community College. His summary mentions studying business and film. I'm guessing you found a troll's profile instead of a real one.
Tracking cars is helps but it's not the right solution for them. Instead they should put the chips in their population at birth just in case their cell phone dies or is turned off.
Found the hipster.
All participants get a trophy.
From what it says, the average person is wasting about 20 hours a week mindlessly consuming content. That's about a month and a half of wasted time by the end of the year...
Itâ(TM)s hard tâ(TM)o take youâ(TM)re argument serioâ(TM)usly â(TM)with all reminâ(TM)ders that Apple doesnâ(TM)t give two shits about â(TM)â(TM)interoperabilityâ(TM)â(TM).
The US landed on the moon, not Brazil, so score one for the paranoid side. E-voting is also known to be a terrible idea, so one more score of the paranoid side.
Actually... memes warned me to not waste money on the new Star Wars films...
Cloud gaming will end gaming sales after next generation.
... As I learned in grammer school, Ocean currents play a pivotal role is weather. Ocean currents have changed. Ocean currents are not generally been part of the climate models... sigh this is not the place to debate science anymore...
That would seem to me to imply that weather plays a pivotal role in ocean currents. Therefore, your claim boils down to "climate models don't include enough data about currents." That seems like a reasonable claim, so far.
Unfortunately, you completely missed another part of your early education: citations. Where are there "incomplete" models that have you so disgruntled?
Beyond that, show me a model that has currents included in it, then remove the currents. Show me how removing currents affects the results. Until you do that, you've proven nothing to me. Right now you've only stated more accurate models can be made by incorporating more information. Well, duh.
:Sigh: ... these high UID kids these days don't know how to debate science anymore...
Not only do we have fake news to deal with, but now we have old news to deal with?
I've known for over a decade that the earth's rotation has slowed drastically (see episodes 5). Anyone with any physics background in the last few decades knew this. Hell, even stackexchange would consider this old news.
After reading the article, I get the feeling that the person writing it knows as much about science as an ant knows about baking pizzas.
Once again, msmash, you're doing it wrong. The person saying the thing goes before the colon, and what they're saying goes after.
Pretty sure that msmash is a special needs or quota based hire. He/she/it has as much grasp of the English language as a man understands menstrual or birthing pains. For someone so inept at its job, I can't think of another explanation for not firing it.
I still stand my argument that if your business offers enough money (and stability), you'll eventually have more than enough recruits. My suspicion is that your HR department is what's fscking you over? Is that the case?