Absolutely! I just started a new job doing 800-171 compliance, so I've been working on familiarizing myself with 800-53, DFARS 7012, and other various DoD requirements. Allowing one's self to be tracked at this level while in a restricted are by an external information system, especially one that then publishes this information, violates a long list of various protocols. People could potentially go to jail over this...
I switched to vaping three years ago and stopped with cigarettes completely after six months. Maybe all the smokers you know are just weak willed, or you have a very small sample.
Subsonic ammunition is pretty quiet, but I doubt it's easily available in California...plus you still have the whole "need a gun" issue. If these attacks are supposed to be all "stealth", then even using a pistol would be bad. Getting caught vandalizing with a slingshoot is one thing, getting caught with a firearm is WAY more serious.
It's talked about here...the 10/1 is a proposed standard for "mobile broadband".
Page 6, paragraph 14:Should we maintain the 25 Mbps download, 3 Mbps upload (25 Mbps/3 Mbps) speed benchmark, and to apply it to all forms of fixed broadband? and in the footnotes: The 25 Mbps/3 Mbps speed benchmark was established in the 2015 Report and maintained in the 2016 Report. Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act, GN Docket No. 14-126, 2015 Broadband Progress Report and Notice of Inquiry on Immediate Action to Accelerate Deployment, 30 FCC Rcd 1375, 1403 -08, paras. 45 -55 (2015) (2015 Report ); 2016 Report , 31 FCC Rcd at 722, paras. 51 -52.
Page 7, paragraph 18: The Commission has not previously set a mobile speed benchmark...We seek comment on whether a mobile speed benchmark of 10 Mbps/1 Mbps is appropriate for mobile broadband services.
IMHO, 10/1 is probably "good enough" for "mobile broadband", but only as long as that isn't your ONLY choice. Most people aren't hotspoting multiple devices off a single cell phone.
"the guy who installs iSCSI storage couldn't configure the needed VLAN access or set jumbo frames in any switch if his life depended on it" ouch. His life might not depend on it, but your network's life certainly does. Honestly, it's probably a GOOD thing that he can't configure jumbo frames on a non-vlaned iSCSI system. Your network just might not crash quite as fast. It still will probably crash out from being flooded with iSCSI traffic, just might take a bit longer. At least knowing that it will make your inevitable troubleshooting / cleanup job easier.
"The people who have left were responsible for collecting and analyzing the intelligence that goes into the president's daily briefing" Oh, those briefings that Trump says he doesn't need? Apparently Trump already knows anything the NSA would tell him anyway...a direct quote: "I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person".
My assumption is that the FSB tells him whatever is really "important", and tells him that anything the "political hacks" (once again, a direct Trump quote) from those people who work in national intelligence is a "hoax".
I'd quit too if my "boss" was purposely ignoring my work and instead was always telling me (publicly and to my face) I sucked at my job and our main competition was far better at it than I ever could be!
Yes, all five states that have their districts drawn by independent groups. Just were are you getting your info on your claim "Usually the district maps are drawn by bi-partisan groups and are routinely tested in the courts to make sure they are fair"? That doesn't reflect reality in the USA.
Why would you need "more wires"? In a properly created distribution and generation system, the distribution part would be a separate entity from the generation. The distribution system should be a public utility, maintained by the local governmental service sector, and paid upkeep via an end-user usage-based tax per kilowatt hour. All a "new" electrical generation competitor should have to do is plug into the grid and start selling. In this system, even a single-household solar grid could be brought in as a "electrical provider", and entire neighborhoods could pool together as a generating utility in such a scheme.
This would be as bought as "free market" as you could get, allowing true competition without any real "lock-outs" due to the physical distribution system.
Well, seeing as Facebook is a "free" product to the general population, that makes it pretty much impossible to use the wallet to force them to do anything. They "sell" their user's data to advertisers...in that regard, this "hate speech" is just as valuable as any other as it helps potential advertisers narrow down their target market promotionals. As someone who has taken several college-level marketing and promotion classes, I think that this is the real reason why FB isn't hard-core in their "policing" of content; and also why they are so keen on enforcement of their "real name" policy (so as to tie users to back-end data set profiles to sell). They are only doing ANY policing because they recently got hauled in from of Congress; censorship of any kind isn't part of their business plan and actually costs them profit in both staff to monitor and a smaller data set.
Once Google knocks out Docker, in a year or two they will then announce the purchase of all the Docker IP. Then, in another year or so, they will announce the "end of life" for the project, just they've with many other products.
The problem with AI is someone has to program it, program the patterns for it to recognize. It's already been shown that many algorithms are developing racial biases. So most likely an AI would only go much faster, but not be much more accurate...at least at first.
And yet, posts on Facebook don't qualify for any Constitutional "freedom of speech" protections. Facebook wasn't formed by Congress, and that is the entity referred to in the Bill of Rights. They don't even receive and government funding, so technically they can censor anyone they want. That would probably be a really bad business decision, but totally legal.
No, actual Nazis were members of Germany's National Socialist German Workers' Party, which went defunct in 1945. There are a few still around, mostly in their 80's+. The current crop of "alt-right"ers that are doing the 1488 chants are a pale imitation, a mimicry. They are considered "neo-Nazis".
Maybe not...but Pai seems to enjoy really "rubbing it in", making sarcastic videos, and out-right insulting anyone who doesn't agree. It's one thing to just repeal NN; it's wholly another to actively be publicly sarcastic and belligerent about it while doing so. It's not civil, isn't no "adult", but it IS pure Trump.
Pai also spreads disinformation about what NN actually is about, complaining about "Facebook censorship" that has nothing to do with the idea of packet inspection and various layers of throttling for no real technical reasons. For me, that is the heart of NN; modifying network topologies and data flows for various non-technical (profit, political, etc) reasons. Making videos while in various costumes with Pizzagaters (who was actually smoking in the video) is not how federal policy should be handled but seems to be the new "Standard" for the USA now.
This is how we do electric, gas...really? There is, per Wikipedia, a total of 16 current states that have a "deregulated electricity market" concerning electricity, and around 28 for gas. Even in those states, only specific areas have any choice. No location has "thousands of different suppliers" for energy.
Other than that, I totally agree with you; your approach of the public easement is one of the most fundamentally sound ones I've seen so far. In most places, at least for copper lines, the companies that laid those lines don't even exist anymore.
Must be nice. In my apartment complex, "someone" (cough AT&T techs cough) long ago physically cut all the coaxial cables off in EACH cable box. So we have ONE choice, you can have a DSL line or you can suck wind. For awhile AT&T had an "exclusivity contract" here, but now that the actual physical connections have been destroyed I suppose they don't need that any longer. The apartment complex was told it would cost over $150,000K to re-run all the cable; plus it would be a sunk cost as they wouldn't make any profit from doing this.
Really? There's not that many humans, statistically, with that high of an IQ. I think the vast majority of UFO sightings are planets, normal aircraft, or (in specific areas of the world) test military craft. Seriously, we "stupid humans" are only a few decades out from having "invisible" items using metamaterial cloaking. If we could do it, any society advanced enough to travel across the stars should have developed something similar years ago. If anything, any reconnaissance mission craft would be tiny, tiny drones.
I blocked Facebook on the firewall at my job, only a few static IPs had access. If people REALLY wanted it, they could use the wifi / phone to get to it. The only department I even thought about giving access for was the marketing / web group.
got the wrong ideas based on misinformation...really? Maybe you haven't actually MET any of them, but thousands of people got conned into going out to various marches by the Internet Research Agency; aka Glavset. Unless your really are living on Europa, then you probably know someone who was conned but just doesn't realize it.
Slashdot Mirror
Absolutely! I just started a new job doing 800-171 compliance, so I've been working on familiarizing myself with 800-53, DFARS 7012, and other various DoD requirements. Allowing one's self to be tracked at this level while in a restricted are by an external information system, especially one that then publishes this information, violates a long list of various protocols. People could potentially go to jail over this...
Give me some templates and apps that help with 800-171 compliance, and I'd be happy hahaha
I switched to vaping three years ago and stopped with cigarettes completely after six months. Maybe all the smokers you know are just weak willed, or you have a very small sample.
Subsonic ammunition is pretty quiet, but I doubt it's easily available in California...plus you still have the whole "need a gun" issue. If these attacks are supposed to be all "stealth", then even using a pistol would be bad. Getting caught vandalizing with a slingshoot is one thing, getting caught with a firearm is WAY more serious.
It's talked about here...the 10/1 is a proposed standard for "mobile broadband".
Page 6, paragraph 14:Should we maintain the 25 Mbps download, 3 Mbps upload (25 Mbps/3 Mbps) speed benchmark, and to apply it to all forms of fixed broadband? and in the footnotes: The 25 Mbps/3 Mbps speed benchmark was established in the 2015 Report and maintained in the 2016 Report. Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as Amended by the Broadband Data Improvement Act, GN Docket No. 14-126, 2015 Broadband Progress Report and Notice of Inquiry on Immediate Action to Accelerate Deployment, 30 FCC Rcd 1375, 1403 -08, paras. 45 -55 (2015) (2015 Report ); 2016 Report , 31 FCC Rcd at 722, paras. 51 -52.
Page 7, paragraph 18: The Commission has not previously set a mobile speed benchmark...We seek comment on whether a mobile speed benchmark of 10 Mbps/1 Mbps is appropriate for mobile broadband services.
IMHO, 10/1 is probably "good enough" for "mobile broadband", but only as long as that isn't your ONLY choice. Most people aren't hotspoting multiple devices off a single cell phone.
"the guy who installs iSCSI storage couldn't configure the needed VLAN access or set jumbo frames in any switch if his life depended on it" ouch. His life might not depend on it, but your network's life certainly does. Honestly, it's probably a GOOD thing that he can't configure jumbo frames on a non-vlaned iSCSI system. Your network just might not crash quite as fast. It still will probably crash out from being flooded with iSCSI traffic, just might take a bit longer. At least knowing that it will make your inevitable troubleshooting / cleanup job easier.
"The people who have left were responsible for collecting and analyzing the intelligence that goes into the president's daily briefing" Oh, those briefings that Trump says he doesn't need? Apparently Trump already knows anything the NSA would tell him anyway...a direct quote: "I don't have to be told — you know, I'm, like, a smart person" .
My assumption is that the FSB tells him whatever is really "important", and tells him that anything the "political hacks" (once again, a direct Trump quote) from those people who work in national intelligence is a "hoax".
I'd quit too if my "boss" was purposely ignoring my work and instead was always telling me (publicly and to my face) I sucked at my job and our main competition was far better at it than I ever could be!
Yes, all five states that have their districts drawn by independent groups. Just were are you getting your info on your claim "Usually the district maps are drawn by bi-partisan groups and are routinely tested in the courts to make sure they are fair"? That doesn't reflect reality in the USA.
Why would you need "more wires"? In a properly created distribution and generation system, the distribution part would be a separate entity from the generation. The distribution system should be a public utility, maintained by the local governmental service sector, and paid upkeep via an end-user usage-based tax per kilowatt hour. All a "new" electrical generation competitor should have to do is plug into the grid and start selling. In this system, even a single-household solar grid could be brought in as a "electrical provider", and entire neighborhoods could pool together as a generating utility in such a scheme.
This would be as bought as "free market" as you could get, allowing true competition without any real "lock-outs" due to the physical distribution system.
Well, seeing as Facebook is a "free" product to the general population, that makes it pretty much impossible to use the wallet to force them to do anything. They "sell" their user's data to advertisers...in that regard, this "hate speech" is just as valuable as any other as it helps potential advertisers narrow down their target market promotionals. As someone who has taken several college-level marketing and promotion classes, I think that this is the real reason why FB isn't hard-core in their "policing" of content; and also why they are so keen on enforcement of their "real name" policy (so as to tie users to back-end data set profiles to sell). They are only doing ANY policing because they recently got hauled in from of Congress; censorship of any kind isn't part of their business plan and actually costs them profit in both staff to monitor and a smaller data set.
Once Google knocks out Docker, in a year or two they will then announce the purchase of all the Docker IP. Then, in another year or so, they will announce the "end of life" for the project, just they've with many other products.
The problem with AI is someone has to program it, program the patterns for it to recognize. It's already been shown that many algorithms are developing racial biases. So most likely an AI would only go much faster, but not be much more accurate...at least at first.
And yet, posts on Facebook don't qualify for any Constitutional "freedom of speech" protections. Facebook wasn't formed by Congress, and that is the entity referred to in the Bill of Rights. They don't even receive and government funding, so technically they can censor anyone they want. That would probably be a really bad business decision, but totally legal.
No, actual Nazis were members of Germany's National Socialist German Workers' Party, which went defunct in 1945. There are a few still around, mostly in their 80's+. The current crop of "alt-right"ers that are doing the 1488 chants are a pale imitation, a mimicry. They are considered "neo-Nazis".
What is really needed is a "Title IIX", since this is an entirely new "beast" that didn't exist in 1934; IIX is the next number available in the Act.
Maybe not...but Pai seems to enjoy really "rubbing it in", making sarcastic videos, and out-right insulting anyone who doesn't agree. It's one thing to just repeal NN; it's wholly another to actively be publicly sarcastic and belligerent about it while doing so. It's not civil, isn't no "adult", but it IS pure Trump.
Pai also spreads disinformation about what NN actually is about, complaining about "Facebook censorship" that has nothing to do with the idea of packet inspection and various layers of throttling for no real technical reasons. For me, that is the heart of NN; modifying network topologies and data flows for various non-technical (profit, political, etc) reasons. Making videos while in various costumes with Pizzagaters (who was actually smoking in the video) is not how federal policy should be handled but seems to be the new "Standard" for the USA now.
"My lifestyle IS my retirement plan!"
This is how we do electric, gas...really? There is, per Wikipedia, a total of 16 current states that have a "deregulated electricity market" concerning electricity, and around 28 for gas. Even in those states, only specific areas have any choice. No location has "thousands of different suppliers" for energy.
Other than that, I totally agree with you; your approach of the public easement is one of the most fundamentally sound ones I've seen so far. In most places, at least for copper lines, the companies that laid those lines don't even exist anymore.
I would just sit on the couch and do absolutely nothing...
Must be nice. In my apartment complex, "someone" (cough AT&T techs cough) long ago physically cut all the coaxial cables off in EACH cable box. So we have ONE choice, you can have a DSL line or you can suck wind. For awhile AT&T had an "exclusivity contract" here, but now that the actual physical connections have been destroyed I suppose they don't need that any longer. The apartment complex was told it would cost over $150,000K to re-run all the cable; plus it would be a sunk cost as they wouldn't make any profit from doing this.
Really? There's not that many humans, statistically, with that high of an IQ. I think the vast majority of UFO sightings are planets, normal aircraft, or (in specific areas of the world) test military craft. Seriously, we "stupid humans" are only a few decades out from having "invisible" items using metamaterial cloaking. If we could do it, any society advanced enough to travel across the stars should have developed something similar years ago. If anything, any reconnaissance mission craft would be tiny, tiny drones.
I blocked Facebook on the firewall at my job, only a few static IPs had access. If people REALLY wanted it, they could use the wifi / phone to get to it. The only department I even thought about giving access for was the marketing / web group.
I think it more went AOL > Yahoo boards > Facebook, but yeah.
got the wrong ideas based on misinformation...really? Maybe you haven't actually MET any of them, but thousands of people got conned into going out to various marches by the Internet Research Agency; aka Glavset. Unless your really are living on Europa, then you probably know someone who was conned but just doesn't realize it.
the golden rule...those with the gold make the rules. Is that the one?