"Although he had supported all previous federal civil rights legislation and had supported the original senate version of the bill, Goldwater made the decision to oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964. His stance was based on his view that the act was an intrusion of the federal government into the affairs of states and that the Act interfered with the rights of private persons to do or not do business with whomever they chose.[16]"
Are you actually Jay Carney? You are great at deflecting questions and using personal attacks to avoid the questions. So I will leave you to your Kool-Aid and Obamaphone.
The only hole in this conversation is your pathetic defense at the indefensible. Liberalism is not what you pretend it to be. Apparently you live in Obama-mania-land, where reality is merely what you want it to be and not the reality of the world. Liberalism in America is marching lock-step towards complete Communism, and is almost there. Government regulations, like Maryland taxing landowners for any surface which does not allow water to permeate into the ground, are further intrusions on freedom.
You defense is to say "no we're not communists, we just want to take money from the rich and give it to the poor," which is exactly what I said earlier.
And the roots of the Republican party are (from the Wikipedia article)
"Founded in the Northern states in 1854 by anti-slavery activists, modernizers, ex-Whigs, and ex-Free Soilers, the Republican Party quickly became the principal opposition to the dominant Southern Democratic Party"
So the Democratic party, is a party based on "Liberal" ideology and Locke's philosophy of the social contract. If that is true, why were Democrats the party of slavery and Jim Crowe laws?
What kind of Liberal would tell someone to stop exercising their 1st Amendment rights? A real Liberal, one who wants to silence their opposition. Are you going to have the IRS audit me next?
Liberals believe in a large government that follows the phrase "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs." This entire premise is reliant on a police state in order to function. The government must know about every possible need you have, whether it be food, diabetes medicine, wheelchair ramp, or special toilet paper (why? I dunno, ask a Dr.) Since the government will have such extensive knowledge of the individual, it will be able to mold the behavior of the population through taxes, fines, and subsidies. Government says that you have to walk 2 miles a day to stay healthy, so they put a check-in stand and tell people "walk 2 miles a day or you will pay a fine/tax." Then each person is allotted a certain amount of each type of food, to make sure they stay healthy. Everything becomes an allotment, the individual only has the rights and ability to make decisions that the government allows them to.
Conservatives (NOT Republicans) believe that the government exists because the citizenry allows the government to exist. The government is not in charge, the people are. And the citizenry have the rights and abilities to make their own decisions and pay the consequences of their actions, good or bad. It is the government's job to give you the ability to succeed, not force you to succeed.
Tell me more about how extreme groups on the right of the political spectrum which believe that government should not exist are the same as Nazism and Communism.
Both Nazism and Communism are tools of the extreme left, increased size of government.
The hidden bomb shelter 10 feet underground which has a 90-day food supply, 10,000 rounds of ammo, and an independent power/water supply. That's protected by secrecy.
Because Liberals, like O'Malley, believe in a police state. It is much easier to oppress your population and monitor them if you have their fingerprints and DNA on file.
"Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. "
On no other issue will Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan all agree with each other.
Why doesn't Lithuania just adopt the Obama model, investigate everyone who donates to the enemies of the political office in power and organizations that have words like "patriotic" in their charter? Seems to be a lot cheaper.
Blue Coat will never be approached, as they sell their product to the US Government for use in many three-letter agencies. Either the US Government is forcing Blue Coat to have a back door, or the USG doesn't want Blue Coat to pull their license for 90% of government firewalls.
To: Cisco From: Iran Subject: OMG HELP! Body: Dear kind sirs of Cisco, My name is Barrister Allahu Akbahara Salami Mozambique. I am trying to install your router system here in order to oppress my population in the name of Allah. However, I have been trying to change the root password for your switch. Whenever I try to telnet into it, the welcome message says "America, Fuck Yeah!" and plays a strange intro song. At the same time, all of the webcams, printers, faxes, document scanners go completely haywire and my network traffic spikes.
Also, I have a large inheritance that I believe is meant for you. Could you send me your bank account information so that I may deposit a sum of 89 billion rial ($18 US) into your account?
Yours in kind regards, Barrister Allahu Akbahara Salami Mozambique
You all are mostly familiar with Java. So create some sort of large project that is based in Java. Minecraft mods come to mind as an easy one, but there is still the possibility of some sort of web app/game that you all could participate in creating.
I'm sorry, I must have missed the memo about tank shows, grenade shows, land mine shows, and nuclear weapon shows.
And just an FYI, tanks are not firearms, they are vehicles. Storm chasers use vehicles that could be defined as "tanks" regularly, but I do not see anyone complaining about them. What is regulated on a tank is the machine gun and 120mm cannon. However owning a tank is 100% legal.
Slashdot Mirror
"Although he had supported all previous federal civil rights legislation and had supported the original senate version of the bill, Goldwater made the decision to oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964. His stance was based on his view that the act was an intrusion of the federal government into the affairs of states and that the Act interfered with the rights of private persons to do or not do business with whomever they chose.[16]"
Source: Check your facts
Are you actually Jay Carney? You are great at deflecting questions and using personal attacks to avoid the questions. So I will leave you to your Kool-Aid and Obamaphone.
The only hole in this conversation is your pathetic defense at the indefensible. Liberalism is not what you pretend it to be. Apparently you live in Obama-mania-land, where reality is merely what you want it to be and not the reality of the world. Liberalism in America is marching lock-step towards complete Communism, and is almost there. Government regulations, like Maryland taxing landowners for any surface which does not allow water to permeate into the ground, are further intrusions on freedom.
You defense is to say "no we're not communists, we just want to take money from the rich and give it to the poor," which is exactly what I said earlier.
And the roots of the Republican party are (from the Wikipedia article)
"Founded in the Northern states in 1854 by anti-slavery activists, modernizers, ex-Whigs, and ex-Free Soilers, the Republican Party quickly became the principal opposition to the dominant Southern Democratic Party"
So the Democratic party, is a party based on "Liberal" ideology and Locke's philosophy of the social contract. If that is true, why were Democrats the party of slavery and Jim Crowe laws?
What kind of Liberal would tell someone to stop exercising their 1st Amendment rights? A real Liberal, one who wants to silence their opposition. Are you going to have the IRS audit me next?
I missed that, but that is an amazing quote. Think it is going in my signature block.
Not a very convincing argument. And I prefer to study real sciences, not fake and contrived sciences like political science.
Challenge accepted:
Liberals believe in a large government that follows the phrase "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs." This entire premise is reliant on a police state in order to function. The government must know about every possible need you have, whether it be food, diabetes medicine, wheelchair ramp, or special toilet paper (why? I dunno, ask a Dr.) Since the government will have such extensive knowledge of the individual, it will be able to mold the behavior of the population through taxes, fines, and subsidies. Government says that you have to walk 2 miles a day to stay healthy, so they put a check-in stand and tell people "walk 2 miles a day or you will pay a fine/tax." Then each person is allotted a certain amount of each type of food, to make sure they stay healthy. Everything becomes an allotment, the individual only has the rights and ability to make decisions that the government allows them to.
Conservatives (NOT Republicans) believe that the government exists because the citizenry allows the government to exist. The government is not in charge, the people are. And the citizenry have the rights and abilities to make their own decisions and pay the consequences of their actions, good or bad. It is the government's job to give you the ability to succeed, not force you to succeed.
Tell me more about how extreme groups on the right of the political spectrum which believe that government should not exist are the same as Nazism and Communism.
Both Nazism and Communism are tools of the extreme left, increased size of government.
I had that revelation this morning as well. I took an extra shower, because I felt kinda dirty. But the shock has finally worn off.
Very few liberals will admit that and you know it.
FTFY
The hidden bomb shelter 10 feet underground which has a 90-day food supply, 10,000 rounds of ammo, and an independent power/water supply. That's protected by secrecy.
Because Liberals, like O'Malley, believe in a police state. It is much easier to oppress your population and monitor them if you have their fingerprints and DNA on file.
"Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. "
On no other issue will Scalia, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan all agree with each other.
I learned this from Captain Planet as a kid. Why does Sarah Mei just have to repeat the lessons of Earth, Fire, Wind, Water, and Heart?
Why doesn't Lithuania just adopt the Obama model, investigate everyone who donates to the enemies of the political office in power and organizations that have words like "patriotic" in their charter? Seems to be a lot cheaper.
Alliteration x5. Awesome!
Blue Coat will never be approached, as they sell their product to the US Government for use in many three-letter agencies. Either the US Government is forcing Blue Coat to have a back door, or the USG doesn't want Blue Coat to pull their license for 90% of government firewalls.
To: Cisco
From: Iran
Subject: OMG HELP!
Body: Dear kind sirs of Cisco,
My name is Barrister Allahu Akbahara Salami Mozambique. I am trying to install your router system here in order to oppress my population in the name of Allah. However, I have been trying to change the root password for your switch. Whenever I try to telnet into it, the welcome message says "America, Fuck Yeah!" and plays a strange intro song. At the same time, all of the webcams, printers, faxes, document scanners go completely haywire and my network traffic spikes.
Also, I have a large inheritance that I believe is meant for you. Could you send me your bank account information so that I may deposit a sum of 89 billion rial ($18 US) into your account?
Yours in kind regards,
Barrister Allahu Akbahara Salami Mozambique
Dice moderators have unlimited mod points, didn't ya know?
You all are mostly familiar with Java. So create some sort of large project that is based in Java. Minecraft mods come to mind as an easy one, but there is still the possibility of some sort of web app/game that you all could participate in creating.
I'm sorry, I must have missed the memo about tank shows, grenade shows, land mine shows, and nuclear weapon shows.
And just an FYI, tanks are not firearms, they are vehicles. Storm chasers use vehicles that could be defined as "tanks" regularly, but I do not see anyone complaining about them. What is regulated on a tank is the machine gun and 120mm cannon. However owning a tank is 100% legal.
Everyone does have a license to own a firearm. It's called the 2nd Amendment.
Driver's licenses are not regulated by the federal government, and there is no Constitutional guarantee of a person being allowed to drive a vehicle.
When is the government going to mandate smart cars, smart kitchen knives, smart tree branches, smart rocks, smart lightening bolts, smart light sabers, smart hammers, smart chainsaws, smart door knobs, smart electrical outlets, smart rivers, smart rain, smart earthquakes, smart bridges, and most importantly, smart politicians?
Screw that, a real admin uses Linux.
FTFY