Excepts thats not how DP laws work. Sorry, your righteous indignation is nothing compared to being able to verify data held by other companies that are about you
It depends on how much / how long they can clean for. If its 15 minutes a day before exhaustion (etc) sets in and they cant do anything more that day then it shouldnt affect disability claims
Its why we have the Direct Debit g'tee system in the UK: if they clean your account out, both your bank AND the company have to make good, on absolutely everything they have stuffed up.
Any attempt at a EULA *after* purchase is, by definition, unconscionable and unfair, and so falls fould of the unfair contract terms act. So click through EULAs on e.g. shop bought software would seem to fal linto that.
Less murky would be this type of EULA, which is part of an optional service.
Slashdot Mirror
Excepts thats not how DP laws work. Sorry, your righteous indignation is nothing compared to being able to verify data held by other companies that are about you
Yep, the DPA (UK) and EDD implementations elsewhere allow you the right to correct any inaccurate data held about you
It depends on how much / how long they can clean for. If its 15 minutes a day before exhaustion (etc) sets in and they cant do anything more that day then it shouldnt affect disability claims
Its why we have the Direct Debit g'tee system in the UK: if they clean your account out, both your bank AND the company have to make good, on absolutely everything they have stuffed up.
You know you WERE wronged - your details were stolen.
You are attempting to discover fault, and the only (real) way to to do that is through discovery of evidence.
Apparently you dont have the first clue about the legal system.
Any attempt at a EULA *after* purchase is, by definition, unconscionable and unfair, and so falls fould of the unfair contract terms act. So click through EULAs on e.g. shop bought software would seem to fal linto that.
Less murky would be this type of EULA, which is part of an optional service.
This would be the same US which has unprotected speech, yes?
Judges do.
You can patent a rounded rectangle? Wheres the innovation in that?
You can patent a design which has clear prior art? No innovation there, by definition
The massive overreaction and power grab afterwards probably wasnt his idea either.
Why are you sending a document any differently over emai lthan you are over Fax?
If it takes minutes to send via fax, the same or better quality doc will take seconds on email. On the internet connection youre already paying for.
Finally: UK and EU have accepted electronic signatures for a *long* time now. Its the only sensible way forward.
What, a jpg or PDF is a "difficult" format?
I'd take that over crappy low resolution b&w fax any day.
Buy MFDs, they do this.
Good job it is in the UK. Dnot worry, you'll catch up with civilised countries soon.
Exact opposite of the UK.
2004 /= 1990s
Germany /= numerous courts OR around the world.
2004 is not mid 90s.
The design patent is from 2004. NOt really the "mid 90s"
What, a curved black rectangle?
That isnt "design"
It is also a requirement of new directives that force EXPLICIT consent from users.
That is implicit consent, and is insufficient in the EU
Businesses have no such protection under DP laws
Burn a hole in the fuselage?
..from a student at a school for kids who steal stuff?
Nothing, as a reasonable person would conclude it has a high likelihood of being stolen.