Slashdot Mirror


European Users Overwhelm Facebook With Data Requests

An anonymous reader writes "If you've ever wondered how much personal data Facebook holds about you then prepare to be surprised. Using European data privacy laws, it's possible to request the data Facebook has stored about you. The document can total 800 pages covering everything from the expected name, address, and date of birth, right through to every event you've attended, every message you've deleted, and your political and religious views." The best part is that Facebook has to send a physical disc containing the data. This has been exploited by a number of users, completely overwhelming Facebook's ability to make the discs.

214 comments

  1. Link to the original img by AndyAndyAndyAndy · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    It's always confirmation bias!
  2. 50+ Pages? Really? by Commontwist · · Score: 2

    Hundreds of pages of tracking and logging every single user in that kind of detail?
    And that's why I use Facebook as little as possible.

    1. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But you use Google, right?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't Google be subject to the same law (EU directive)? Now that would be interesting.

    3. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't Google be subject to the same law (EU directive)? Now that would be interesting.

      Yes, but it only applies to personally identifiable data i.e. something they can link to an actual person (though via a pseudonym should be enough) - stuff based on cookie ids and ip addresses won't apply. If they link that to a Google+ or youtube account though then that would do it.

    4. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      And that's why I use Facebook as little as possible.

      ...or why we should not have Facebook accounts to begin with? I mean really, with their web bugs scattered all over the place, the only real way to win is not to play.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because even if you don't use FB, people will still post, and tag, pictures of you. Even if you're a grumpy old man -- your kids will do it. Hell, I'm probably doing it right now.

    6. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's that surprising? Most people's status updates alone would take up dozens of pages.

      Then of course you have your photos, videos, notes, message history, chat history, comments you've posted, tags you've received, events you've been invited to, groups you've joined, everything you've ever "liked"...

      I imagine most people would be shocked to find out how many groups they're in, or how many posts, pages, or links they've "liked".

    7. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

      +1

    8. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Sparrow1492 · · Score: 1

      +1

      I'm not sure if this was a request to mod up or rate's it's own +1, funny for the Google Circles reference on a Facebook article.

    9. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

      oh no, I would never use google or facebook for those reasons. I only trust the integrity of Microsoft web services

    10. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I know you didn't mention Google+, but alas, here's a thought: Google was very wise when designing Google+, in that they wanted to make it easy for the user to collect their data from Google+.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Exactly

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    12. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's that surprising? Most people's status updates alone would take up dozens of pages.

      Precisely. The stuff folks want to hide (probable politics, sexuality, religion, financial status, etc...) can all fit on a single page. The rest is just the raw data. They're probably being scared by the word "compiled" and thinking there is much more than there is.

    13. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only real way to win is not to play

      Unfortunately, this doesn't really work either. Until I signed up for Facebook, everyone kept bugging me to sign up so that our friendships could be somehow codified as Facebook links. It's like Facebook has brainwashed people into believing that nothing can be real without having an entry on Facebook.

      I'm tempted to say the real way to win is an anonymous-style war, but I'm satisfied with releasing the minimum amount of personal information possible to placate friends that, despite this obsession, I'd like to keep.

    14. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. Are we able to do the same with Google and have them print out everything they have on you? http://www.google.com/about/corporate/company/address.html if you want the European offices to place your request.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, plugins like Ghostery or Adblock work wonderfully at illuminating and blocking tracking services.

      Second way to play. =)

    16. Re:50+ Pages? Really? by chromas · · Score: 1

      Error: Google Circular Reference

  3. I thought.. by somersault · · Score: 1

    I thought there was a built-in option to download everything you ever said/did/uploaded in a zip? I remember seeing it, but never actually used it.

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:I thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That option doesn't actually include everything, which is the point of the requirement to send out the CD's in the first place. If you delete a post or a message for example, it just becomes inaccessible to everyone -except- Facebook, the .ZIP download will exclude those messages while the CD's people are getting essentially have everything they've -ever- posted, and more still.

    2. Re:I thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      my experience was this was extremely lack luster.

      i forget what i got but it was certainly not everything i'd ever posted (and not deleted)...

      the zip totaled about 2mb, which i couldn't understand give then delay ( a couple of days) it took face to round everythign up.

      maybe i'll send off for a CD =)

    3. Re:I thought.. by Zironic · · Score: 2

      Well, the point is that the law requires them to send you a physical copy.

  4. they could agree to send by non-CD by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if my purpose in requesting the data about me isn't to help DDoS Facebook with a deluge of requests, but because I actually want to know what data Facebook's compiled on me. That is, after all, why the law exists in the first place, and it's not at all strange that someone might want to know that information.

    If Facebook finds it expensive and inconvenient to mail out physical CDs, they could agree to allow at least optional delivery by other means, such as over the internet.

    1. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by DJLuc1d · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure they do it this way for the same reason most rebates are still mail-in. They don't expect the user to actually do it out of inconvenience. If it was as simple as clicking a button on the internet, more people would be aware of how much data they actually collect.

    2. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is really awesome up until someone manages to pretend they're you and get all of your data. At least shipping it on a disc to a physical address adds a few extra layers of inconvenience for the people who might otherwise attempt to do this. Considering how much information Facebook has on some people, that data falling into the wrong hands could do some serious damage to a person's life.

      Hopefully there's some follow up from the people who have requested their data. It will be interesting to see how much stuff Facebook stores and all of the things that it knows that people would rather prefer it didn't.

    3. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by admdrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is another means: https://www.facebook.com/settings Click "Download a copy of your Facebook data." and follow the instructions.

    4. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Facebook finds it expensive and inconvenient to mail out physical CDs, they could agree to allow at least optional delivery by other means, such as over the internet.

      Sure! They'll post it as on a new user wall with the username UserTrepidityData.

    5. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If Facebook finds it expensive and inconvenient to mail out physical CDs, they could agree to allow at least optional delivery by other means, such as over the internet.

      If Facebook finds it expensive and inconvenient to mail out physical CDs, they could agree to simply not collect and store all that data.

      There - fixed that for you!

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that it's not expensive for them, the revenue that data generates fare exceeds the cost of sending CDs to everyone.

    7. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      If Facebook finds it expensive and inconvenient to mail out physical CDs, they could agree to simply have the law changed.

      FTFY to accord more with reality.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    8. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just clicking on a button, filling out a form, and referencing the right law. You don't have to send them the request via mail.

    9. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law was also passed in 1988, when mailing physical CDs was really the only feasible option for a large amount of data.

    10. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      That would completely undermine the capabilities and services of Facebook that everyone uses and loves. No one would use Facebook if it did not store all of your photos and status messages, because then no one could access them.

    11. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they do it this way for the same reason most rebates are still mail-in. They don't expect the user to actually do it out of inconvenience.

      That is in fact the reason why rebates are mail-in, but it's not as nefarious as you make it out to be. Take what happened with the HP Touchpad blowout as an example. HP decided to price the Touchpad far below its fair market value. That resulted in demand which far outstripped supply. Many people who wanted it got one at a great price. But huge quantities were also scooped up by middlemen who resold them at a huge profit at closer to fair market value.

      So how can a manufacturer discount its product below fair market value, without giving middlemen an opportunity to buy it up and resell it at a profit? You offer a rebate, but you have to make it just annoying enough and the terms restrictive enough that a middleman can't apply for all those rebates himself. What is a 15 minute annoyance for the end-buyer becomes hours of work for a middleman trying to flip dozens of the item for a profit. Consequently it's no longer worth his time, which leaves more of the rebate-discounted item for purchase by real end-users.

    12. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      The issue discussed was that while you can access CURRENT data with the 'copy all your data' function, facebook also stores everything you've deleted. This data is ONLY available if you get the physical copy type deal.

      Your comment doesnt really apply to the deleted data :)

    13. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It is as simple as filling out a web for for you, but Facebook then use the postal service. My guess is that for legal liability reasons they won't to risk sending massive amounts of personal data to to an email account. I bet they don't encrypt the data on the CDs though, could be fun if yours goes missing...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by phoenix321 · · Score: 2

      Everyone would use Facebook the exact same way they do now if Facebook did NOT store all those photos and status messages that you deleted.

      Don't store things that no one sees. Delete things that users want deleted.

      Problem solved.

      I want some of my info to be available to friends, but if I delete a file, I mean it.

    15. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could agree to allow at least optional delivery by other means

      They could put it on a Facebook page!

    16. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but that STILL wouldn't stop this bunch of 4chaners from abusing this retarded law and requesting physical copies of all the crap they _haven't_ deleted. I mean, seriously, how much stuff have you _really_ deleted on Facebook? I know I haven't deleted very much, and sometimes I do like to go back and look at my comments from years ago. If you think Facebook should perma-delete everything that you delete, that's fine, but that's also a different issue than this one.

      There is also the argument that Facebook definitely keeps multiple redundant copies of their data across many servers in different areas... in fact, they likely even keep backup drives in closets somewhere just in case ALL the servers fail and they actually need to use them... should Facebook not be allowed to keep backups of their data in closets? Every time you hit delete, should they be forced to walk through manspace and delete stuff off of their backup-backup drives?

      And what if make a crawler that accesses all of my friends' pages constantly and saves their data to my hard drive? Google does this already. Should I not be allowed to do this? Should Google not be allowed to do this? If someone deletes something on Facebook, do I have to delete it on my local box? Does Google?

      Personally, I think not. You post something on Facebook, you understand that Facebook now knows that information and they're going to have it forever. You can't untell a secret to a friend or unshow someone an embarrassing photo. If you have something you want to hide, don't put it up to begin with. If you make a mistake, you can "delete" it and hope for security through anonymity that Facebook will do the best they can to keep that Photo from showing up anywhere, but you can never be sure that one of your friends didn't save the image or that there isn't some backup somewhere.

    17. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the opposite problem: wanted to see logs of chats I'd had, back when chat logs weren't saved at all. When they integrated chat logs into the message logs, you could see old deleted conversations - but only if they were messages. Actual chats were not saved.

    18. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Excepts thats not how DP laws work. Sorry, your righteous indignation is nothing compared to being able to verify data held by other companies that are about you

    19. Re:they could agree to send by non-CD by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      There will always be someone trying to abuse systems like this. If this gets annoying enough then more than likely the law will change to include a service fee which is not high enough to be a problem, but would make a 'ddos' highly unlikely. Say something like 5 Euros.

      I personally do not have an issue with facebook storing information about me. With one very big caveat. I want to know WHAT they have stored. I do not care where or why most of the time, but I want to know what.

      If I could get a copy of ALL my facebook data in a convenient zip/rar file I'd go for it. I would be happy with that.
      But as long as they wont tell us WHAT they store, this law serves an important function.

  5. Spoiled Children...... by ZiakII · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just don't get this new attitude of spending the entire day complaining about Facebook. Personally, I don't use the site and last time I checked no was forcing these people to use the site either. From how that article is written they seem to be acting like a bunch of children who are just complaining just because they can.

    1. Re:Spoiled Children...... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You may not use Facebook, but that doesn't mean you're not on it. You may be in a picture, or mentioned in a comment somewhere by a friend. You can be tagged, at which point it's your full name, picture, (time-dependent) location, the activity you were engaged in (therefore hobbies or social activities), you are linked with others tagged in that photo and their hobbies, religions, political affiliations, relationships. Someone could mention that you were at the office party, at which point they know you work for the same company as $FBuser.

      Don't assume that because you didn't create a profile yourself that Facebook doesn't have one anyway.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last time I checked no was forcing these people to use the site

      apparently there's a new trend where companies like Spotify are requiring people to have facebook accounts to use certain services or get certain deals

    3. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last time I checked no was forcing these people to use the site

      Now that is getting scary. HOW did you check on whether any of these people were being forced to use the site - how did you even get a list of all theirs names? Why do you carry out checks like that at all, and how often do you do it?

    4. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Cajunfiend · · Score: 1

      you can't be tagged if you don't have a facebook profile.

    5. Re:Spoiled Children...... by dredwerker · · Score: 1

      you can't be tagged if you don't have a facebook profile.

      I am sure you can put people's names in(that arent on facebook) but its not proper tagging as its not unique.

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    6. Re:Spoiled Children...... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      what's to stop people from using your name in a comment on the photo? You don't need a facebook profile for that to happen...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    7. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but they dont have a unique hash for you and without that they will never be reliably able to link you to anything because your name is non-unique.

    8. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they seem to be acting like a bunch of children who are just complaining just because they can.

      You just summed up 98% of reddit posts.

    9. Re:Spoiled Children...... by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 2

      Completely correct.

      The same thing goes for Google: you may not have an account with them, but chances are they have a lot of your e-mail (people you correspond with use Google Mail). Use Google's search engine? They have your queries. If you post to Usenet, they have those posts, too. And I am sure they collect data through ads on non-Google sites, too. It is their stated mission to "Googleâ(TM)s mission is to organize the worldâs information and make it universally accessible", and they're very good at it.

      A lot of people don't realize, or vaguely know but don't quite grasp just how much of what they consider private is collected by companies like Google and Facebook. Asking for a copy of what they know about you and receiving several hundred pages in return really drives the point home.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    10. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you can. I see it all the time. I can't click on a name to go to a non-existent page, but your name is down there.

    11. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      So?

      This is a freedom that people have always had. You can't stop other people from talking about you, and you shouldn't be ABLE to stop them.

    12. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I don't use facebook, have any friends, or leave the house.

    13. Re:Spoiled Children...... by ACS+Solver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This may not be a popular viewpoint, but I think it's a very relevant issue, and I do not use Facebook. I believe its very existence is an ethical issue though. Facebook represents a truly evil company, not in the unethical-business-practices sense, but a whole different order of that, I'd say they're rapidly approaching Gestapo-evil. Facebook stores enough information to learn a lot about specific individuals, and Facebook is conditioning people to give up their privacy. It might just be one of the most useful tools for an oppressive government or unethical intelligence organization to blackmail someone or, better, ruin their public image.

      Facebook is not run by idiots. Those people know what they're doing, they know they're storing even "deleted" data and they know they're building very detailed profiles on every user. They also, unlike most of actual Facebook users, probably have the intelligence and foresight to imagine how it all may be used for horrible things, so there's no way I can see them as morally innocent.

    14. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You may not use Facebook, but that doesn't mean you're not on it. You may be in a picture, or mentioned in a comment somewhere by a friend."

      Yep. I don't have a FB account and was getting e-mails from them asking me to join with a name and FB picture of a person they said I might know who is a member. And that person was a friend-of-a-friend I didn't know very well at all. In the fine print was a link I could click to opt out of getting further e-mail. I did and later wondered if I just gave them conformation a the social connection between us.

    15. Re:Spoiled Children...... by pyrosine · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly it isnt just for certain deals in spotify's case - it is to register

    16. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Plunky · · Score: 1

      Ok, so if somebody has done that and later I join facebook... can you click on the name then, or does the photo have to be re-tagged?

    17. Re:Spoiled Children...... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      So?

      This is a freedom that people have always had. You can't stop other people from talking about you, and you shouldn't be ABLE to stop them.

      And a "freedom" (if one wants to call it that) that we've had in Europe since various points in the 20th century is that a company shouldn't be able to store or process personal data without the individual's consent, or store the data for longer than necessary, or store more data than strictly necessary, or prevent an individual from updating incorrect information or requiring the deletion of the information.

      I can't stop people talking about me, but if they give my email address to ACME Ltd I can stop them from using it.

      Storing a Joe Bloggs tag against a photo seems to fall into the former case. Joining together some combination of all the Joe Bloggs tags on my photo albums, my friends' photo albums, the time I added joe.bloggs@example.com to an event, and my friend importing joe.bloggs@example.com from Hotmail is no longer people talking -- that's a company processing data.

    18. Re:Spoiled Children...... by kd5zex · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it has to be re-tagged.

    19. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add LinkedIn to this and now you've voluntarily submitted your own background check when applying for a job.

    20. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bring up a salient point regarding Google's data collection and retention. I sincerely hope this is or becomes an option with Google. It's sad, however, that as a US citizen, it looks like I need to wait for the EU to get it done. Even better would be the option to remove all your data.

    21. Re:Spoiled Children...... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      > Those people know what they're doing, they know they're storing even "deleted" data and they know they're building very detailed profiles on every user.

      Kind of makes you wonder what happens if Facebook hires a Scientologist.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    22. Re:Spoiled Children...... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'd say they're rapidly approaching Gestapo-evil.

      They are about to start killing and torturing people?

    23. Re:Spoiled Children...... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They usually don't have the right to post pictures of you online but they'll do it anyway and there's nothing you can do about that once the image has been posted, no matter how damaging it could be (remember that perfectly normal activities in private life can still be damaging if shown e.g. to prospective employers).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    24. Re:Spoiled Children...... by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      I know the example of Gestapo is somewhat exaggerated/controversial, but I still believe it to be an apt comparison. I said Gestapo and not the SS or somesuch because I actually see similarities - Gestapo, especially before the war, wasn't only a torture and murder organization. They were an organization where incriminating information about citizens was delivered, and it's scary how many Germans were perfectly willing to inform on others. The Gestapo didn't really come across information by itself so often, it was mostly thriving on tipoffs.

      Of course Facebook does not kill and torture, and won't, but there are similarities in the information-gathering sense. And I would not be surprised at all if Facebook cooperates with governments or government agencies that have plans more sinister than targeted advertising.

    25. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well think about that one for a second, Sparky. If a photo is tagged John Smith, does it make sense to auto-tag the first John Smith that signs up after that? Of course not.

    26. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ you are a drama queen.

    27. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do this today, using Google's privacy dashboard which lists most of the information they've collected.

      If you want to download anything, head on over to dataliberation.org where:

      The Data Liberation Front is an engineering team at Google whose singular goal is to make it easier for users to move their data in and out of Google products. We do this because we believe that you should be able to export any data that you create in (or import into) a product. We help and consult other engineering teams within Google on how to "liberate" their products. This is our mission statement:

      Users should be able to control the data they store in any of Google's products. Our team's goal is to make it easier to move data in and out.

    28. Re:Spoiled Children...... by Xest · · Score: 1

      If this is true then Facebook is most certainly breaking UK Data Protection Law.

      A 3rd party cannot give Facebook permission to store personal data on you, that is a blatant breach of the data protection act. Only you can give a company permission for that, there are some exceptions (i.e. law enforcement) but Facebook would not in any way fall under any of these.

  6. What if you don't have a facebook account? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    I know, it is hard to fathom that anyone would not have an account, but I have intentionally avoided it myself. However since I do appear to be the only person left in the world who doesn't have one, there is bound to be something that someone who knows me has posted that relates to me.

    Is it possible to request it? After all, if a user requests all the info that facebook as on them, and all they give them is the information that they posted, that is - to be kind - a very incomplete version of the data set.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by dredwerker · · Score: 1

      I know, it is hard to fathom that anyone would not have an account, but I have intentionally avoided it myself. However since I do appear to be the only person left in the world who doesn't have one, there is bound to be something that someone who knows me has posted that relates to me. Is it possible to request it? After all, if a user requests all the info that facebook as on them, and all they give them is the information that they posted, that is - to be kind - a very incomplete version of the data set.

      How do you know which person you are getting the information on, without the unique login? So they can only give information on the person's userid and anywhere they are mentioned uniquely. tagged photos etc.. come to mind. Imagine trying to code the logic for anything else and make it correct.

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    2. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the law (specifically the Data Protection Act) doesn't care about those difficulties. I live in the UK and don't have a Facebook account either, but know lots of people who do (not to mention all the sites that integrate into Facebook that presumably set tracking cookies/log information), and I'm *extremely* tempted to ask Facebook what they know about me.

    3. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never signed up to Facebook, but I was getting constant emails from them as if I had signed up. I assumed they had gotten my information from someone who tagged me or something. Anyways I contacted them and told them to delete all I formation about me, and they denied even having my email address. The emails stopped though. I live in Canada so maybe they were afraid of the privacy ramifications of admitting to collect peoples information or spam them without their permission.

    4. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Complaint 02 is about shadow profiles for non-users.

      I don't see why you couldn't request it, except that you (going by your journal) are American, so the Irish/European data protection laws don't apply.

      (It's interesting that the data is provided for free. British companies are allowed to make a "reasonable charge" for providing the personal data, which is almost always £10.)

    5. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can easily be identified by your circle of contacts. Sure, there is room for error, but internet advertisers build profiles on you with less data.

    6. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Spad · · Score: 1

      They can refuse to provide the information under a couple of circumstances, but none of them are "we don't want to" or "it's hard" (mostly "We've already published this or are about to" or "This would require disclosure of company/government secrets"). They can also charge you a nominal fee if it would take an excessive amount of time and/or effort to fulfil your request.

    7. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However since I do appear to be the only person left in the world who doesn't have one"

      Actually, there are two of us. (There might even be a third, possibly in the mountains of Appalachia or somewhere in Antarctica.)

    8. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, we have the same laws here in Kanuckistan (PIPEDA), so that may have something to do with it. After all, Facebook's privacy headaches started when Jennifer Stoddard (the Kanuckistani Federal Privacy Commissioner) became the first to drag Facebook to the table and force Facebook into making privacy concessions (the Europeans followed soon after).

      She was the first data protection authority in the world to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the privacy policies and practices of the popular social networking site, Facebook.

      The provinces that have enacted similar enabling information also allow for you to request the data. In Quebec, for example, they have to *print it out*. That could get VERY expensive to print and send by mail. When the Journal de Montreal ran a full-page "coupon" that people could clip out, fill in and email to the federal govt requesting a copy of the Fed's "all-in-one-consolidate-all-govt-data-on-U" HRDC database, 29,000 people made the request, and HRDC ended up having to delete the database instead.

    9. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a facebook account, but they surely know a lot about me anyway. Not long ago someone "invited" me to join facebook, and in the email they sent to me they had a list of "other people I might know", including someone that I had met one time through a meetup.com event several years prior.

    10. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it's actually capped at a maximum of £10. Companies may choose to charge less (or provide the data for free) but, predictably enough, most don't.

    11. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since I do appear to be the only person left in the world who doesn't have one

      I dont have a facebook account either.. ..that makes 2 of us.
      btw I add to that non-account list ALL social media platforms. ..and I step even further.. I dont own an iPhone...
      actually my mobile doesnt even have any sort of multimedia capabilities except SMS, which I never use.
      it's monochrome LCD is holding up now for over 12 years now.

      If you want to talk with me fast, call, or if it's not so urgent but quasi official, send an email (to my own mail server), if it is legal in any matter, send me a mail by post.

      I don't feel like I am missing out on much.
      My friends are still my friends because *real* friends are platform agnostic.

    12. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder if we could get Jennifer Stoddard to come down south to Bigkorpistan and work her magic here?

    13. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      You are correct, in the UK the fee is "up to £10". See here.

    14. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      British companies are allowed to make a "reasonable charge" for providing the personal data, which is almost always £10.)

      This is because the maximum charge IS in fact 10 pounds. Though some companies make it as difficult as possible to request your personal data, for example the Bank of Scotland insist you must send a written request to some unusual location and the ONLY method of payment they will accept is a cheque made payable to some other obscure name. They leave a lot of margin for you to make a mistake and will try to take as close to 40 days to remind you of this and ask you to resend the request hoping for some other mistake. The trial by frustration approach.

    15. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there actually two of us on the planet without a facebook account.

    16. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The problem with Bigporkistan is Porkington, D.C.

    17. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, and I'm just guessing here, but maybe the Bank of Scotland uses a third-party to process those requests? Or a subsidiary company?

      That would explain the unusual address, payable name, and lack of payment options.

      --
      -David
    18. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, and I'm just guessing here, but maybe the Bank of Scotland uses a third-party to process those requests? Or a subsidiary company?

      Maybe a subsidiary, but demanding payment only by cheque is a pain, especially considering most people don't use cheques any more (I had to wait 28 days and convert my account just to get them). But I am fairly sure that passing your details to other companies is a breach of the data protection act.

    19. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a small world. Friends-of-friends-of-friends actually tells you a lot; remember that six degrees of separation experiment? Last night I discovered that one of my old best friends' brother married a girl I'd met years ago at a camp some hours away. They both ended up at the same college, met, and now they're married.

    20. Re:What if you don't have a facebook account? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you agreed to when y ou signed up to the account. There should have been a DPA statement laying out how hthey, and others, can process your data.

      Easiest way to tell is to look up the BoS registration on the ICOs website, as this should tell you any partners they share data with

  7. Download Archive Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the USA version, there is a link on the Account Settings page to "Download a copy of your Facebook data" that ostensibly creates an Archive of your data and sends you an email when it is ready. It's been a week .....

    1. Re:Download Archive Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only gives you what you can see. This gives you every single thing that facebook has about you, every pic and deleted pic, every deleted email. They keep copies of everything even when you dont.

      As for it being a week? Are you referring to how long it takes for Facebook to set up the .zip file for download? I did that two days ago and I got an email in about 45mins.

  8. This is valuable by Tweezak · · Score: 1

    OMG! My lost Farmville crop records!! Now I can honestly show my farming prowess and put it on my resume!

    1. Re:This is valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or show it to investors when you go to start your new farm?

  9. Brilliant by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Step One: Use free service that you are in no way obligated to use.
    Step Two: Complain about how the service records your usage of said free site
    Step Three: Request a compilation of all data that you agreed to put on said free site
    Step Four: ????
    Step Five: UnProfit (for Facebook)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Brilliant by kenh · · Score: 2

      You should add to Step One: "Use free servide that you are in no way obligated to use to track communication by you and your friends
      And reword Step Two: "Complain about how the service records your communications on said free site

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Brilliant by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      And in what way is that relevant?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Brilliant by kenh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should have been clearer - the 'suggested' changes were to underscore that the point of facebook is to enable users to communicate in an asynchronus fashion, and the only way to do that is to record your communication, then to point out that when users complain about facebook storing all their communications they are actually complaining about the very purpose of facebook.

      I meant to build on your thought, not tear it down - sory if my inartful approach offended.

      (It's like a user uploading all their photos to flicker, then complaining that flicker is keeping their pictures...)

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad comparison. Facebook does not NEED to store deleted information to be able to allow communication between users. They do that for their own purposes. Flickr NEEDS to store the images to be able to serve them later.

    5. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where does "keep all of your deleted posts, images, and absolutely everything long since gone from the site in a database" fall into there?

      I deleted something. Even I don't have access to it. Why are they retaining access to it?

    6. Re:Brilliant by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for the clarification. I'm easily confused :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Brilliant by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Facebook tracks you even if you never create an account or go to their site. Just load some pages with the Likeâ button and check your facebook.com cookies.

    8. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step One: Create a service where you collect information from people to sell to advertisers
      Step Two: Collect information from people
      Step Three: Sell to advertisers
      Step Four: Profit!
      Step Five: Get disclosure requests from people whose information you've collected
      Step Six: Become indignant at the audacity of those people whose information you've been selling to make your profits

  10. Not only Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was unaware of this possibility.

    So it's basically possible to request this from all entities which do business in Europe.

    I wonder what Blizzard has stored about me.

  11. Before the outrage gets too loud... by kenh · · Score: 1

    Just remember everything, I mean EVERYTHING Facebook knows about you, those 800 pages of details, was input by either you or one of your "friends" - if you didn't want Facebook to have the info, you shouldn't have given it to them in the first place.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >EVERYTHING Facebook knows about you, those 800 pages of details, was input by either you or one of your "friends" - if you didn't want Facebook to have the info, you shouldn't have [i]any friends[/i]

      FTFY

    2. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      if you didn't want Facebook to have the info, you shouldn't have given it to them in the first place.

      To your friends?
      That's easy enough on Slashdot ;-)

    3. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      if you didn't want Facebook to have the info, you shouldn't have given it to them in the first place.

      To your friends?
      That's easy enough on Slashdot ;-)

      Yeah, just post it in an article, no one will read it. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by dmomo · · Score: 1

      This could well be the case, but are you sure? Can you say with certainty that Facebook does not use other data-collection methods? In the interest of micro-targeting ads, I could see them looking to external sources in order to piece together a more robust profile. You word your statement with a little too much authority.

    5. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but all facebook "knows" is your email address - nothing else is verified. Sure, facebook could try and build a dossier from external sources based on your email address, but what value would that really hold when compared with the cost/effort involved.

      The more likely answer is for facebook to track and analyze the data you and your friends enter - you/they gave it freely, and it is already on their servers.

      I'll concede the wording issue - I was going for dramatic effect/hyperbole.

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Before the outrage gets too loud... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Just remember everything, I mean EVERYTHING Facebook knows about you, those 800 pages of details, was input by either you or one of your "friends" - if you didn't want Facebook to have the info, you shouldn't have given it to them in the first place.

      Did I really "input" the information, if all I did was open a webpage containing a Facebook "Like" button?

      Does a reasonable person think they're leaving Facebook information when they "Delete" a message or "Remove" an event invitation?

      When a friend chooses to "Import contacts/friends from Hotmail" (or whatever), and I reject the invitation to Facebook, should Facebook keep a record of that?

      If I buy a cinema ticket online, from a company with Facebook integration, should Facebook store that data? What if I've ticked the box to prevent this -- does it really prevent it, or does it just hide it from me?

  12. Well... by cjcela · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is time to have something like this in the U.S.A. as well - a physical disk, or a printout is a good idea, since it involves some effort from the company stalking your online life. Data is money, people, and most of us are way liberal and generous with our own data. I would be curious about what information Google has on me. Facebook.... nah, I've figured them years ago and closed my account before it was late.

  13. Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by ghn · · Score: 2

    Funny how the Personal data request form actually collects even MORE personal information about requesters, such as (real) birth date, personal phone numbers and of course full mailing address, all information many people do not enter in their profile..

    1. Re:Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by 2phar · · Score: 2
      Not to mention govt issued ID:

      Please upload a government-issued ID with signature to this report and ensure that your full name, date of birth, and photo are clear. You should also black out any personal information that is not needed to verify your identity (e.g., social security number). We will permanently delete your ID from our servers once we have used it for verification purposes.

      Does the law really require that you have to provide this information in order to see your records.?

    2. Re:Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by chomsky68 · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly.

      --
      I'm Not Antisocial, I'm Just Not User Friendly
    3. Re:Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by Zironic · · Score: 1

      The law requires you to verify your identity (Imagine if they allowed random people to request your personal information!). Facebook are however legally required to delete the information after they've processed the request.

    4. Re:Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Does the law really require that you have to provide this information in order to see your records.?

      Maybe not, but I imagine the law would really come down on them for releasing records to the wrong people. I see requesting government-issued ID as ass-coverage; if they release the wrong records to the wrong people now they can prove they made a reasonable effort to prevent it.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    5. Re:Facebook is actualliy gaining from this.. by Inda · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this is illegal in the UK. Classed a counterfeit.

      Using the UK data protection act is easy, but it does cost a single pound for admin costs. I wouldn't be suprised if these requests were rejected for that alone.

      Get someone else to sign the cheque too. Agencies have been know to take your signature, scan it, then print it back on a consumer credit agreement form.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  14. Are you sure about that? by AftanGustur · · Score: 1

    every message you've deleted,

    Are you sure this is legal in the EU?

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:Are you sure about that? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      If they still have a copy of it, they're required to include it.

      Databases often do a "lazy delete" - mark a single "deleted" bit that prevents it from showing up anymore. Only periodically will they compact the database, removing all the records that are marked for deletion. If they have plenty of storage they may never compact due to the required downtime during the process.

      So if it's "deleted", but it's not really gone, they still have to give you a copy of it.

    2. Re:Are you sure about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeping deleted messages might indeed not be legal, see the Deleted Postings complaint in http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Complaints/complaints.html

  15. Grow up, people by davmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It takes a woefully naive person to use a service like Facebook for free and not expect that Facebook is collecting your data and somehow profiting from it.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Grow up, people by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Most people know, they simply don't care.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:Grow up, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like profit requires total information collection and retention. Most people don't have a problem with companies offering the service and profiting from it. What they worry about is what and how much information is stored.

      The biggest issue I've known people to complain about is retention of deleted information. People make mistakes and accidentally post information they want to keep private, or accidentally submit to the wrong account. They can delete it, but the companies remember and still use it.

    3. Re:Grow up, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way does this go against the idea that you can request the data they do store on you?

      Just because they offer the service "for free" doesn't mean that you have no rights.

    4. Re:Grow up, people by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It takes a woefully naive person to expect Facebook to only collect data if you use their service, when they have Like buttons loading their scripts all over the web.

    5. Re:Grow up, people by houghi · · Score: 1

      It can do that, as long as it follows the laws. One is that they have to tell you what they know about you.

      Perhaps the best would be to just put the servers in Russia. That way they would not have to follow pesky European or even American laws.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Grow up, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You yourself are a "woefully naive person" if you think they only collect data on people who have joined. I wouldn't be surprised if a large portion of those requesting the data didn't even have accounts.

    7. Re:Grow up, people by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 2

      Yes they would, as in order to do business in teh EU they would be required to follow DP laws - and exporting data outside of the EEA requires an equivalent DP law in the country, or youre not allowed to export it.

    8. Re:Grow up, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife (a FB user) asked me what I thought about "black mica extract (a "miracle" product that takes heavy metals, radioactivity and bacteria out of any water and precipitates it into an orange sludge at the bottom of a container which leaving you water that has had minerals added through the removal process.) This substance not only cleans the water it provides cures for arthritis and other chronic illnesses ( i forget the list, google it). After giving me all this info she said it was only 25 dollars for 2 ounces and thought she might try it. Now clearly this is a scam, something that is too good to be true. ASking for the studies that showed that it worked she gave me the sales website. There is no, zero, zip, zilch in the way of hard science supporting this stuff. Yet some people want to buy it. Someone is making a good living from selling this, how is FB really different from this, except in scale? they prey on people who believe that something can be free and have no cost.
      People in FOSS know the truth. We know that free doesn't mean without cost, we are willing to pay the cost, we are aware of reality.
      Simple really, but most people still buy lottery tickets.

  16. I don't think doing this is a good thing by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I don't think doing this is a good thing. A likely result is that companies will lobby for dilution of the law, probably something like having a legitimate need for the data. When companies really have something to hide they will use this, meaning that someone will have to use the old expensive procedure of going to court to show that they did have a legitimate need. The cost will put most people off and it will certainly delay all cases.

    1. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It being a summation of your online life for a lot of people seems to be a legitimate enough reason for me, but I haven't signed over my world to facebook, so maybe I don't understand

    2. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Unlikely to happen, at least in Germany. Informational self-determination has been a constitutional right since 1983. And today, in a speech celebrating the 60th birthday of the constitutional court, the director of the court said that privacy and self-determination with regard to private actors (as opposed to the state) will become even more important in the future. These are significant hurdles for any law-maker or lobbying group to overcome.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    3. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by icebraining · · Score: 1

      But Facebook isn't incorporated in Germany, why would they have to abide by German law? They have to abide by EU law because they're in Ireland.

    4. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      But Facebook isn't incorporated in Germany, why would they have to abide by German law?

      Well, I guess they could ignore it if the managers don't mind being arrested and sent to Germany if they ever travel to the EU.

    5. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      But Facebook isn't incorporated in Germany, why would they have to abide by German law?

      Well, I guess they could ignore it if the managers don't mind being arrested and sent to Germany if they ever travel to the EU.

      There's even a 0.0001% chance that the extradition treaty the US uses all the time to bring people to the USA might work the other way round.

    6. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1
      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    7. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by icebraining · · Score: 1

      But if they never committed a crime in Germany, why would they even be trialed, let alone extradited? Has anything similar to that ever happened in Germany?

    8. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Does opening an office necessarily means being incorporated there?

    9. Re:I don't think doing this is a good thing by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 1

      But Facebook isn't incorporated in Germany

      I think you are mistaken: Facebook Germany GmbH, Große Burstah 50-52, 20457 Hamburg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland

      Source

  17. Re O nthere anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what finally convinced me to bite the bullet and get a FB account. There were pictures of me at events where I was tagged as being in them floating around Facebook. People were contacting me saying, "Hey, I saw you were at so-and-sos party." So chances are if you have any social life at all, you will be on FB whether you have an account or not.

  18. Yesh! by assertation · · Score: 1

    I really enjoyed reading the blurb for this thread. Go Euros!

  19. If they don't honor a request I'll sue - they pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really really hope they don't honor my request in time - because they are bound by law to DO SO. If they don't, they commit a "Verwaltungsuebertretung" (special german legal term for a crime) and will have to pay a fine.

    And they can be sure I'll see to that.

  20. So - who exactly does Facebook sell this info to? by wm_brant · · Score: 1
    While it is certain that Facebook sells the information they collect to advertisers, I was wondering if *governments* were some of Facebook's customers? By 'customer', I mean beyond the type of legal demand for information on a specific person, in relationship to a specific event.

    I wonder - is it possible that some of the information collected by Facebook is collected at the request of one or more governments?

    I'd wager that even if none of it is currently collected at the request of governments, that someday - probably in the not too far future - it will be...

    Of course, that leads me to wonder if the fees that Facebook collects when it complies with information requests from governments are profitable to Facebook? *That* would be an interesting line item to add to their annual report!

  21. Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is another means: https://www.facebook.com/settings Click "Download a copy of your Facebook data." and follow the instructions.

    Except that that only gives you the information that's currently accessible to you and other facebook users. It does not include the photos and posts you've "deleted" (but which facebook still stores). It certainly does not include the history of sites you've visited while logged into facebook, or any other tracking history which facebook has gathered and associated with your name. Think about it: facebook has at least an order of magnitude more information on you personally than you appear to think. All of it is used for customizing sales of your identity and your interests and so forth to facebook's customers (you're the merchandise, not a customer).

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      This might be a good thing though.

      If this process requires a manual review by an employee which leads to a several day delay, it keeps someone from harvesting complete data on another person through a compromised account. The employee who assembles the data could make an effort to verify that the person requesting the data actually owns the profile and that the mailing (or email if they add some digital delivery option) address seems to correspond with the owner.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Basically the zip gives you the sanitized version for public consumption, the legal data request gives you absolutely everything. I think it also includes a right to have data altered if it's inaccurate (intended to let you fix mistakes in their data that could be harmful to you, especially bad with companies like those who give credit ratings).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by HJED · · Score: 1

      It (the .zip) also doesn't include posts and photos you have been tagged in and the list of statuses is incomplete and inaccurate.

      --
      null
    4. Re:Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt all this data collection is purely for marketing purposes. I think I've clicked on one ad in all the time I've used Facebook. They want to know about me for other purposes, or _someone_ does. Yep, I think my account is going to go into hibernation now.

    5. Re:Wrong, by an order of magnitude or several by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Yep, the DPA (UK) and EDD implementations elsewhere allow you the right to correct any inaccurate data held about you

  22. To all the "get lost and don't use it" smart-asses by rainer_d · · Score: 1
    I got tons of "Connect to ... on Facebook" mails from people I don't even know because some friend/customer synced his addressbook with FB - with my address etc. in there.

    I don't have an account on FB and never will.
    But I'm tempted to fill out that form.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  23. Gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised nobody asked this question yet -- but is there an equivalent page for Gmail? (and other google services, for that matter)

  24. It's going to take them some time by andy.ruddock · · Score: 4, Informative

    After making a request under the DPA I received the following :

    Hi,

    We have received your subject access request (the "Request").

    Due to the volume of personal data access requests that we have recently received, we are experiencing significant delay in processing such requests. We therefore are unlikely to respond within 40 days of your initial request. We appreciate your patience and will respond as soon as possible.

    We are presently refining our request response processes and approach to align the present high volume of access requests with the resources available to process these requests. We appreciate your patience and will respond as soon as possible.

    Please be aware as well that we are not required to comply with any future similar requests, unless, in our opinion, a reasonable period of time has elapsed.

    Again, we appreciate your patience and we will respond as soon as possible.

    Thanks for contacting Facebook,
    Facebook User Operations - Data Access Request Team

    --
    God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    1. Re:It's going to take them some time by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Please be aware as well that we are not required to comply with any future similar requests, unless, in our opinion, a reasonable period of time has elapsed.

      So this gives them an obligation to only send at most one CD per user. Not such a big deal I would say.

      And they get your postal address in return for it.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    2. Re:It's going to take them some time by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      There's no 'you must comply within 40 days unless you're just too busy' exemption in the DPA, is there?

    3. Re:It's going to take them some time by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      ok, so under that law what's the penalty for non-compliance? I'm sure they could petition for a waiver if they are demonstrating good will and intent to get all the info out. and many laws have some stipulation about unduly burdensome requests...

    4. Re:It's going to take them some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, they are admitting they are likely to break the law. Where is the Information Commissioner when you need him to serve an Enforcement Notice?

    5. Re:It's going to take them some time by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      They dont have an ability to wait past 40 days - instant fine if they do.

      If this is the UK report them to the ICO

    6. Re:It's going to take them some time by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Not that i've ever seen. Report them to the ICO for failing their statutory duties as a data procesor

    7. Re:It's going to take them some time by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1
      From the ICO website (www.ico.gov.uk) :

      Q: I've made a request for my personal details. How long does it take?
      Once the organisation receives your request it has 40 calendar days (or 15 school days if the request is to a school) to get a copy of your information to you.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
  25. NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by daveewart · · Score: 2

    What a great idea. About the only bit of personal information that most Facebook users haven't already given to Facebook is their postal address. Yet this process does just that.

    Wouldn't surprise me if this "Annoy Facebook" thing was actually started by Facebook to harvest postal addresses. :-)

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    1. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought, but you could get yourself a PO Box, right?

    2. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are required by the law to delete any information that was sent to them to confirm your identity for this request after sending you the data. They could get into serious trouble if they wouldn't do that (probably worse than not complying with the request at all).

    3. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Address the mail to your post office. It's called General Delivery (US)/To be claimed for (UK)/Poste Restante. It might cost you few pennies, but only if you care to claim the letter, not if you just want to annoy facebook.

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Poste_restante

    4. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor would I find myself surprised to find a rootkit hidden on the cdrom, a-la Sony.

    5. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

      A $25 fee and a half hour's work acts like a magic barrier against the benignly dissatisfied

    6. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can reuse it later on to receive other mail. It's not like it's limited to facebook. Also, to my surprise I found out that setup-fee aside, PO Boxes are free (at least in Germany)

    7. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by SufficientReason · · Score: 1

      Implying that your home address couldn't be inferred from the history of locations from which you've logged in?

    8. Re:NowFacebook gets your postal address too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are required to destroy the information given in the request once they've completed it.

  26. Re:So - who exactly does Facebook sell this info t by biodata · · Score: 1

    The CIA were reputedly linked closely with investors who supplied the second round of venture capital funding to Facebook. Google 'Facebook CIA' for research into this. Facebook does not necessarily need to sell information to governments if it is effectively a proxy government agency.

    --
    Korma: Good
  27. Not all data available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried the US version of "request your data" and it did NOt include every wall post. I know this for a fact because I then started deleting all of my wall posts and notifications, and every few days I'd clean my wall, new posts from farther back in time would appear. This went on for months, and none of these wall posts were in the file I downloaded. So I would be surprised if everything was on thar disc.

  28. find you favourite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops,so much amazing http://www.infashion2011.com

  29. Mailing a physical CD by wfstanle · · Score: 2

    There might be a more nefarious reason for the physical mailings. You see, they might only have your expected name and address. Physical mailings will allow FaceBook to add your EXACT name and address to their database. If they didn't have it before, they surely have it now!

    1. Re:Mailing a physical CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why God invented PO boxes.

    2. Re:Mailing a physical CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the availability of them in your country, a possible way around this could be to get a PO box and give that to Facebook as your mailing address. I doubt they'd will bother trying to obtain permission to probe the Post Office for your real address, and if they did, I doubt they'd succeed.

      Personally I'd be more worried about somebody intercepting the parcel and harvesting the data for themselves than anything else when using this service.

    3. Re:Mailing a physical CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post restante, bitches.

    4. Re:Mailing a physical CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly my thoughts. or they want to make sure that it is only Europeans who get their data and nobody else.

  30. This is very little by Hentes · · Score: 1

    The majority of it are just messages and logs, I think they have kept the juicy stuff for themselves.

  31. Manchurian Candidatesa by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    We are going to see political campaigns that are precisely targeted down to individual voters.

    The next time you respond to a political pollster, you need to wonder whether or not the information it is seeking is individually targeted at you in an attempt to refine their database pertaining to you. Commercial and social data is just one more source of political information. The more detail the number-crunchers get, the more they will be able to predict your vote.

    The candidates will then model their behavior on the data model that gets them sufficient votes to win.

  32. The Directive by Pinky3 · · Score: 1

    There is no requirement that the data be sent on a CD.

    Article 12
    Right of access
    Member States shall guarantee every data subject the right to obtain from the controller:
    (a) without constraint at reasonable intervals and without excessive delay or expense:
    - confirmation as to whether or not data relating to him are being processed and information at least as to the purposes of the processing, the categories of data concerned, and the recipients or categories of recipients to whom the data are disclosed,
    - communication to him in an intelligible form of the data undergoing processing and of any available information as to their source,
    - knowledge of the logic involved in any automatic processing of data concerning him at least in the case of the automated decisions referred to in Article 15 (1);
    (b) as appropriate the rectification, erasure or blocking of data the processing of which does not comply with the provisions of this Directive, in particular because of the incomplete or inaccurate nature of the data;
    (c) notification to third parties to whom the data have been disclosed of any rectification, erasure or blocking carried out in compliance with (b), unless this proves impossible or involves a disproportionate effort.

    1. Re:The Directive by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Ok.. so what's your point? They might put it on a flash drive?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  33. You have to send a copy of your ID by kiwix · · Score: 2

    So, if I want to use this form to request the information they have about me, I have to give them a postal address, a phone number, and a copy of a state issued ID. I'm not sure I'm willing to give them even more information, just to know that they store about me...

    1. Re:You have to send a copy of your ID by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

      The page also *says* that they will delete the image, once your identity has been verified. Until there is a way to remotely verify that you are who you say you are, and that I am not you, and vice versa... that's what they're working with.

      What sort of proof would you want that the person requesting YOUR information is anybody but you? It is a serious question, because I am looking for a fool-proof, better method.

      You're worried about your "private" information, yet are irritated that you must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you are, indeed, you.

      --
      Something witty.
    2. Re:You have to send a copy of your ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All true, and yet, if you are worried about what information is being stored about you, it is not great to be giving up the last bit of info they don't have yet. It's a real catch-22.

    3. Re:You have to send a copy of your ID by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      According to other posters they can't keep that data.

      Granted, that post was from an Anonymous Coward, and I didn't check, so caveat emptor.

    4. Re:You have to send a copy of your ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please upload a government-issued ID with signature to this report and ensure that your full name, date of birth, and photo are clear. You should also black out any personal information that is not needed to verify your identity (e.g., social security number). We will permanently delete your ID from our servers once we have used it for verification purposes.

      Yes, I believe them.

  34. data of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I bet it's damn easy to trick them into sending you another user's data on such a disk. Scary.

  35. Users of other countries?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any specific law that would allow US members, or US citizens, not members of Facebook to request and receive their collections of data? I am not a member but have many friends who are, and I suspect Facebook may have some data on me. I would like to know what they know and how much!

    If anyone in other areas of the world know about laws that would also allow citizens of other countries to request their data, please post them here and other sites!!!

    IMHO Facebook is totally out of control, and may need to be shut down everywhere!!! PLEASE send Facebook a clear and STRONG message!!!

    Thanks to all!

    Rick Stanley

  36. What am I being surprised by? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what all the indignation is about. The data shown is about 80% of the bare minimum needed for core Facebook functionality (I imagine there's lots more involved in the fancier features).

    Are people really surprised that FB is storing the info that shows up in their profiles? Or that FB stores their list of friends and the stuff they post?

    How do they imagine Facebook works? Magic?

    (also, measuring structured, relational data in PDF "pages" is about as useful as measuring it in Volkswagens)

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  37. How to save the USPS by wjousts · · Score: 2

    Step 1: Pass a similar data protection law in the US. Require the requestee to provide the data in a physical format if the requester asks for it.

    Step 2: Get lots of users to request their data from Facebook - make sure they insist they want the data on CD.

    Step 3: ?????

    Save the USPS and annoy Facebook? Sounds like a win-win to me!

  38. Political & Religious Views by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

    I love how the summary says they store your religious and political views like they aren't boxes literally labeled religious and political view that your purposely decided to fill out and display publicly on your profile info page. My God, they're probably even storing your facebook NAME and profile PICTURE somewhere on their SCARE SERVERS!!!!

  39. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a facebook profile either. I saw the privacy $&!# ready to hit the fan long ago

  40. I don't use it, never have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yet I know for a fact that they have quite a profile on me thanks to dumbass acquaintances who I don't like and who won't comply with a simple request to untag me have tagged me in photos.

  41. Fail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can view the SHA1 hash of a password here: http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Data_Pool/data_pool.html#Password

    Does that hash change only change when your password changes, or is it time-dependent? It says "Last change..." but I can't tell whether that means time since the password last changed or time since both the password and the hash changed.

    Either way, it means that anyone with your username and up-to-date hash can impostor you by sending the hash in a scripted logon-exchange! If they have your hash (and they can exploit it before it times out in case it's time-dependent), they don't even need to know your password! FAIL!

  42. The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only a matter of time until some terrorist tracks down somebody's children and kidnaps or harms them, all because Facebook or some other company kept data that they really do not need, and also failed to keep it truely encrypted. It's a matter of when, not if.

    I don't have kids, but if I did and something ever happened due to facebook activities, I would be showing up at Zuckerberg's house in the middle of the night.

  43. How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook is an American company. How dare they demand anything by a private company? Private companies must be protected from this kind of marxist communist fascist nazist socialism.

  44. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm consistently amazed at how much information sites--even those I don't use--collect about me. I don't use any social networking at all. Facebook, Google+, whatever. Never have. That said, the other day I had to create a Google+ account in order to receive some pictures that a friend wanted to send through his phone's API. So, I create the account, get the pictures, and immediately go around disabling anything that anyone could use to find me (since I didn't intend to use the account ever again).

    There was a page where it suggested people to add to your circles. I've received dozens of invites from friends and just ignored them, so you'd think they would have been on the list. Instead, there was just one name: a girl I had a one-night stand with two years ago. I'd never sent her an e-mail. Called her maybe twice. Somehow, Google+ decided that I knew her and should add her to my friends list.

    The only way I could think of that Google would know I had any contact with her would be that I searched for her name a while back to show a friend a picture (hey, she had a nice body), and it remembered.

    Concerning, I say.

  45. Please upload a copy of your government-issued ID? by edibobb · · Score: 1

    In order to get your personal Facebook data, they have a small requirement: "Please upload a government-issued ID with signature to this report and ensure that your full name, date of birth, and photo are clear." Nice!

  46. Can I ask Google for the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this specific to Facebook, or can I ask Google for the same information if I live in the EU? For a long time, I've been hoping to get hold of the information that Google knows about me...

  47. FREE CDs!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riot is on, and CDs are flying off the shelves of Facebook, which is clearly a combined book and music store. The cadets of the Police Academy are on their way to restore public order.

  48. Remove information by Shooter28 · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure this is even useful unless you can also request information to be permanently deleted.

  49. OMG your're right. by mbkennel · · Score: 2

    "Those people know what they're doing, they know they're storing even "deleted" data and they know they're building very detailed profiles on every user. They also, unlike most of actual Facebook users, probably have the intelligence and foresight to imagine how it all may be used for horrible things"

    OMG.

    Zuckerberg's ambition isn't limited to being CEO of Facebook, bitch.

    Zuckerberg will run for Governor and then President. Information is power. Personal information is personal power.

  50. They are allowed to charge a fee for this service by Japher · · Score: 1

    And at £10 per request, this could turn into a profit center for Facebook.

  51. and you use Slashdot by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if it's possible to do this for Slashdot? Every single post read, every login, every IP address, perhaps supposedly anonymous posts, every moderation, etc. And with Slashdot, there isn't the ability to even delete anything. The only saving grace is that most people don't attach their real names to their accounts.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  52. And it's hit the papers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in the Irish Times.

    FTA:
    The Irish Data Protection Commissioner is to undertake an audit of Facebook’s activities outside the US and Canada next month following complaints over the retention of users’ information by the social networking giant.

  53. give them more data! by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    So, you just gave them your home address on top...

  54. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what does slashdot know about me and my friends?

  55. Landfill count by hessian · · Score: 1

    Remember when trolls were funny, and not just "hey we're a crowd, let's destroy something"?

    The end result of this will be thousands of CDs that will serve no purpose, and will end up in the landfill along with every other remnant of human selfishness on earth.

    Might as well just shoot a spotted owl straightaway.

  56. But we can already download our Facebook data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does the data Facebook is supplying in accordance to the EU laws compare with the data that can be downloaded by logging in to Facebook and clicking Account Settings > "Download a copy of your Facebook data."?

  57. At last ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last ! A reason to join faeces book just so I can annoy the bustards :)

  58. Re:They are allowed to charge a fee for this servi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe after they cover the expense of building new software to pull all this data from their databases and export it into a single folder. They certainly won't make any money paying someone to run all those queries by hand.