It does when the wind directly deposits radioactive particles on your beaches, and they can be measured as higher than they have been at any point in the present.
Oh, I'm sorry. A little radiation is just fine, right? So I'm sure you'll ask the dentist to take a few extra x-rays. No harm, no foul, right? Every little bit doesn't count, huh?
And how often does that happen? A dam breaking, killing a few hundred thousand? Are there any examples in history? Chernobyl death toll is estimated at 1M by some. After Hiroshima, the cancers weren't measurable at a higher level for 20 years. So we'll not know the true toll of Fukishima ever, and certainly not any time in the next 10 years.
Dear fucking idiot: The defense shield has always been to defend North America, not Europe. Have you not read the news at any point in the last 5 yrs? And if not, why comment on something you don't know about?
Are you disputing that other planets are warming up? All you've said is "this argument is stupid" without any explanation why. Does that make you any better than OP?
Though I can't find much past year 2010 - in 2010, "they" were becoming concerned because the number of residential households relying solely on mobile phone service was up to... 20%.
How often do legitimate companies one pay's actual legal fees to rip one off? Especially an entrenched monopoly like a local phone company? I'd say the odds are higher, but not as different as most would expect.
It's nice to know you're so willing to protect your daughter as to go to jail, and not have a job to help pay for her college and medical care. She's lucky to have a murderer for a father.
Oh wait, you were just pretending to be a badass. Like all those people who moved to Canada when Bush was elected, and all those people who deleted their facebook after moving to google+.
Is that his customers should be required to sign something stating they understand he is not a doctor dispensing commonly-accepted medical advice.
He shouldn't be censored, becuase we should be free to pay any person for any kind of advice we want. Freedom FROM licensing.
We're allowed to think the world was created 6000 years ago -- and pay money to people who promote this idea. But apparently we're not allowed to follow people's advice. We're not smart enough to make our own decisions. The government should make them for us. That's what I'm getting out of this.
Another phrase I hate: "the science is settled." That's what they said to Socrates, Galileo, the guy who discovered penicillin (too lazy to Google) etc ad nauseum. It kills me that the people for whom skepticism is (supposed to be) a way of life have such a habit of asking the rest of us to set aside all skepticism.
Argument from authority fallacy. Also, why would a german court define the definition of a word in english?
Basically, you are a fucktard making a fucktarded argument. You are not worth the effort of responding to, but I will solely for the benefit of anyone else reading this tread, so they see how fucking stupid and wrong you are:
No. That is not what censorship is. Go look it up in the dictionary. You are incorrect, and beyond pointing that out, I'm not sure how to convince you. Let's just say: You're giving the Fox News interpretation of things.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, I'm sorry. A little radiation is just fine, right? So I'm sure you'll ask the dentist to take a few extra x-rays. No harm, no foul, right? Every little bit doesn't count, huh?
And how often does that happen? A dam breaking, killing a few hundred thousand? Are there any examples in history? Chernobyl death toll is estimated at 1M by some. After Hiroshima, the cancers weren't measurable at a higher level for 20 years. So we'll not know the true toll of Fukishima ever, and certainly not any time in the next 10 years.
... please read the news.
Dear fucking idiot: The defense shield has always been to defend North America, not Europe. Have you not read the news at any point in the last 5 yrs? And if not, why comment on something you don't know about?
If you think the description of the article isn't EXACTLY how things go down in America, you haven't been reading enough.
now THAT's an answer I'd mod up! :)
Are you disputing that other planets are warming up? All you've said is "this argument is stupid" without any explanation why. Does that make you any better than OP?
Though I can't find much past year 2010 - in 2010, "they" were becoming concerned because the number of residential households relying solely on mobile phone service was up to ... 20%.
How often do legitimate companies one pay's actual legal fees to rip one off? Especially an entrenched monopoly like a local phone company? I'd say the odds are higher, but not as different as most would expect.
NTSC broadcast tv is 29.97 fps.
A few years of federal government contracting will clear your misconception right up. ;)
I hear it also hurts when meteorites fall on one's head. I suggest wearing a helmet 24/7.
You're handicapped.
Huh? The TSA was created by Bush, you fucking idiot.
Oh wait, you were just pretending to be a badass. Like all those people who moved to Canada when Bush was elected, and all those people who deleted their facebook after moving to google+.
Congratulations. You've removed 2 of the 10 billion or so possible people that can abuse a child.
That's why I'd make my enterprise application use Internet Explorer. U mad?
I believe Chrome knows what's best for us.
I believe Mozilla does not.
So... Interesting and compelling comment you've posted.
He shouldn't be censored, becuase we should be free to pay any person for any kind of advice we want. Freedom FROM licensing.
We're allowed to think the world was created 6000 years ago -- and pay money to people who promote this idea. But apparently we're not allowed to follow people's advice. We're not smart enough to make our own decisions. The government should make them for us. That's what I'm getting out of this.
Another phrase I hate: "the science is settled." That's what they said to Socrates, Galileo, the guy who discovered penicillin (too lazy to Google) etc ad nauseum. It kills me that the people for whom skepticism is (supposed to be) a way of life have such a habit of asking the rest of us to set aside all skepticism.
What kind of retarded logic is that?
Generally speaking, no one individual can be most people. [/trollface]
No, we will generalize it to "vaccines don't always work".
nerds poop. perhaps even more than average.
Basically, you are a fucktard making a fucktarded argument. You are not worth the effort of responding to, but I will solely for the benefit of anyone else reading this tread, so they see how fucking stupid and wrong you are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship#Types http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censorship http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censoring http://gilc.org/speech/osistudy/censorship/ http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censor http://www.thefreedictionary.com/censorship http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Censorship
Now, please go eat the bag of dicks you came in on, asshole.
No. That is not what censorship is. Go look it up in the dictionary. You are incorrect, and beyond pointing that out, I'm not sure how to convince you. Let's just say: You're giving the Fox News interpretation of things.