DRM can be implemented openly. However, to prevent "fake implementation" from impersonating the open one, the entire stack would need TPM-esque verification.
You're targetable either way, although in cases like Cuba the propagation rate via Internet vs. flash drives is probably different than the rest of the world.
Guess there is a difference between your definition of "damage" and the GP's.
In a business setting, any time, effort, or money that you spent, and would not have to spend if there were no breach is considered "damage".
... and you can solve our problems, why would I want to boot you, potentially sending you to one of our competitors, instead of keeping you and making you solve more problems for us?
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed, though in a better world, this shouldn't even be remotely newsworthy.
"Video will give us more revenue. Therefore, we're killing text. We'll try anyway."
Do your job too well, and people start questioning if it's needed in the first place.
What, bots can't watch videos?
DRM can be implemented openly. However, to prevent "fake implementation" from impersonating the open one, the entire stack would need TPM-esque verification.
You're targetable either way, although in cases like Cuba the propagation rate via Internet vs. flash drives is probably different than the rest of the world.
Guess there is a difference between your definition of "damage" and the GP's. In a business setting, any time, effort, or money that you spent, and would not have to spend if there were no breach is considered "damage".
... and you can solve our problems, why would I want to boot you, potentially sending you to one of our competitors, instead of keeping you and making you solve more problems for us?
From your own link: "TURKTRUST is the one and only local ECSP that its root certificates are recognized to Windows Programs by Microsoft."
Yes, but you don't have to be a domain registrar to be a CA. And in this case, TURKTRUST is just a CA, not a registrar.
http://www.turktrust.com.tr/en/hakkimizda.html