Yeah, I doubt many mobile customers are going to fully utilize a 12Mbps connection (and it's debatable whether that's actually what they'd receive in the first place).
You do realize that the school is getting $30 in state funding per day for each student in attendance, not paying $30 per day per student to whatever third party provides the RFID cards, right?
Not really. Some run as low as 30% efficiency. In fact, according to this article, the automobile Otto cycle can be more efficient than a power plant's Rankine cycle.
However, power plants do (or ought to) have better pollution controls for scrubbing pollutants out of their exhausts.
...but if you assume constant acceleration over the 42 seconds to get to 1000 mph (~447m/s), it will take a distance of around 9.4km to reach top speed. That's a long drag strip.
The USA took a relatively short look at this but then they stopped since they could not also produce weapons from these reactors and at the time it was all about the bomb.
Alvin Weinberg (former head of the Oak Ridge National Lab) actually took on a fairly ridiculous nuclear aircraft project in order to be able to put more development time into LFTRs.
Okay, there is a very, very small amount of extra energy used when metabolizing the sucrose: the bond between the fructose and glucose molecules has to be broken.
...some of the energy contained in the fructose is consumed by the body having to metabolize it into glucose. This is not a negligible difference, and if you think I'm bullshitting you, read the wikipedia article on the Thermic Effect of Food and read this paper specifically comparing fructose and glucose:
Self-contradiction aside, you realize that sucrose has to be metabolized into fructose and glucose, and that fructose then has to be further metabolized, right? Posting an article that compares the thermic effects of fructose and glucose is not relevant when you're comparing sucrose to HFCS. I don't know of anyone who uses pure glucose for anything, except for diabetics with low blood sugar.
Slashdot Mirror
And it calculates around 330 seconds (5.5 minutes)
As for where you got 4GB...
Yeah, I doubt many mobile customers are going to fully utilize a 12Mbps connection (and it's debatable whether that's actually what they'd receive in the first place).
"More than 40" is not the same as "80." I've hit 60 hours in a week before, but at 80 I doubt I'd be any more productive.
You do realize that the school is getting $30 in state funding per day for each student in attendance, not paying $30 per day per student to whatever third party provides the RFID cards, right?
Power plants are really efficient.
Not really. Some run as low as 30% efficiency. In fact, according to this article, the automobile Otto cycle can be more efficient than a power plant's Rankine cycle. However, power plants do (or ought to) have better pollution controls for scrubbing pollutants out of their exhausts.
That's only off by a factor of about 2 if the above quoted 0.04 mpg is correct.
...but if you assume constant acceleration over the 42 seconds to get to 1000 mph (~447m/s), it will take a distance of around 9.4km to reach top speed. That's a long drag strip.
There's actually a key (bound to tilde ~ by default) that will move you towards where your cursor is regardless of enemies.
The USA took a relatively short look at this but then they stopped since they could not also produce weapons from these reactors and at the time it was all about the bomb.
Alvin Weinberg (former head of the Oak Ridge National Lab) actually took on a fairly ridiculous nuclear aircraft project in order to be able to put more development time into LFTRs.
Can I get my Turturkeykey business started on there?
Okay, there is a very, very small amount of extra energy used when metabolizing the sucrose: the bond between the fructose and glucose molecules has to be broken.
...some of the energy contained in the fructose is consumed by the body having to metabolize it into glucose. This is not a negligible difference, and if you think I'm bullshitting you, read the wikipedia article on the Thermic Effect of Food and read this paper specifically comparing fructose and glucose:
Self-contradiction aside, you realize that sucrose has to be metabolized into fructose and glucose, and that fructose then has to be further metabolized, right? Posting an article that compares the thermic effects of fructose and glucose is not relevant when you're comparing sucrose to HFCS. I don't know of anyone who uses pure glucose for anything, except for diabetics with low blood sugar.
I prefer 2012-09-05. Computer sortable, and easy to read, as it goes from most general to most specific, left to right. And it's ISO compliant!
Why don't you quit shoving your PC-ness down my throat?