which of the 12 should have been listed to make it apolitical? the story is already politically driven due to the involvement of the incompetent and openly partisan (and racist) office of Brian Kemp.
this is an office that fails at security, and actively discourages minority voters. they had already previously been hacked multiple times, the most recent of which after the office claimed to have fixed its security faults by implementing encryption and security staff, a claim proven to be false. this is the office that has sued to stop voter registration drives in minority majority areas of the state, and been caught slow-walking the registrations of minority voters.
Factually incorrect. Reality calling. It would like to remind you of:
the Lord's Resistance Army? Christian abortion clinic bombings? Evangelical Christian Muslim villages massacred in northern India? Nationalist Hindus and others.
You're forgetting to condemn the millions of people amongst who the live, and who allow them to continue to operate, be funded, preach hate and recruit.
Pure utter BS that should get you smacked upside the head with a reality stick, instead of modded up.
The 'richest, bravest, intelligent', as if they are somehow more worthy, and were less desperate for an improvement in circumstances, even though that's the primary motivation in migration. This is simply racism, claiming that current migrants are somehow inferior and different from previous ones.
No the crime rate isnt going up; migrants almost always have lower crime rates than the native population. No the economy doesn't go down; rather they almost always lead to growth in economic activity, because the economy isn't a zero-sum game, and they need goods and services and jobs just like everyone else.
This is simply the same BS nativist bigotry that accompanies EVERY wave of migration, and its just as wrong now as it has been every time in the past, whether it was directed at the Chinese, Irish, Italians, Vietnamese, Japanese, Polish, or now Hispanics.
not going to vote for him because he's a libertarian of principle when convenient, and a serial flipflopper that abandons those principles when pressured.
"real americans" being people willing to earn starvation wages, and be subservient to the economy, instead using our power through our government of the people to make the economy serve us? yeah, fuck you
the market HAS been setting the wages...as low as it can. and the result is a middle class that is shrinking, and has decreasing buying power, creating a self reinforcing cycle that continues to make people poorer.
First off, one paper doesn't immediately invalidate everything that came before it. Secondly, no, I don't think you actually understood the paper or its point, but rather are projecting from it what you want to hear.
Yes, stating that because its warmer than during the last freaking ice age everything is ok makes you look dumb. Probably because you are, or you wouldn't spend your time trolling with such idiotic comments. the best trolls are at least plausible, and have a degree of intelligence behind them. yours are the equivalent of flinging feces at the wall.
The Middle east is already extremely hot, and at the edge of human endurance. If, with no other changes, it also had added moisture, the humidity level would rise dramatically. assuming this was stable (and it didn't get driven off by existing patterns), this would raise the total heat index considerably, potentially beyond human inhabitability.
In fact, there's another article on Slashdot about this very thing. You should go read it.
So then you read about how Sandy caused ~40% more damage, both physical and economic, due to the increased storm surge, than it would have without said sea level rise, and similar effects on other storms on coastal areas?
No apparently, you didn't, because if you had you wouldn't need to have pointed out the precise reason WHY sea level rise biggest risk factor isn't the static avg sea level, but its effect on storm surges.
-Yes, it's warmer than it was during the last ice age. -Yes, life existed during periods even warmer. But not current life, which evolved under climactic conditions that took millions of years to change....not a mere 200 years. It's not the presence of life, but the conditions it evolved under, and the rate at which it is capable of adapting to changing conditions, conditions that under natural cycles take millions of years to change.
(how many times are you going to repeat the same easily dismissed bits of moronic stupidity?)
Slashdot Mirror
which of the 12 should have been listed to make it apolitical?
the story is already politically driven due to the involvement of the incompetent and openly partisan (and racist) office of Brian Kemp.
this is an office that fails at security, and actively discourages minority voters. they had already previously been hacked multiple times, the most recent of which after the office claimed to have fixed its security faults by implementing encryption and security staff, a claim proven to be false. this is the office that has sued to stop voter registration drives in minority majority areas of the state, and been caught slow-walking the registrations of minority voters.
im not a vegetarian.
but you are a moron.
Not the point.
Point: it's never changed this fast, and it's our fault.
Denier doesn't get it, news at 11:05.
Factually incorrect.
Reality calling. It would like to remind you of:
the Lord's Resistance Army? Christian
abortion clinic bombings? Evangelical Christian
Muslim villages massacred in northern India? Nationalist Hindus
and others.
its easy to say anything on the internet when you dont bother to provide any proof to back anything up
You're forgetting to condemn the millions of people amongst who the live, and who allow them to continue to operate, be funded, preach hate and recruit.
Stop talking about the GOP that way
yes, a number of refugees totaling 0.2% of Europes population is threatening to it.
or, more likely and far more realistic, you and the dipshit mods that modded you are just racist fucks
Pure utter BS that should get you smacked upside the head with a reality stick, instead of modded up.
The 'richest, bravest, intelligent', as if they are somehow more worthy, and were less desperate for an improvement in circumstances, even though that's the primary motivation in migration. This is simply racism, claiming that current migrants are somehow inferior and different from previous ones.
No the crime rate isnt going up; migrants almost always have lower crime rates than the native population.
No the economy doesn't go down; rather they almost always lead to growth in economic activity, because the economy isn't a zero-sum game, and they need goods and services and jobs just like everyone else.
This is simply the same BS nativist bigotry that accompanies EVERY wave of migration, and its just as wrong now as it has been every time in the past, whether it was directed at the Chinese, Irish, Italians, Vietnamese, Japanese, Polish, or now Hispanics.
here's a (woefully incomplete) list of said flipflops:
Rand Paul, serial panderer: 5 major flip-flops that reveal his brazen hypocrisy
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/2...
explaining why he was wrong about why i wouldnt vote for Rand Paul isnt trolling.
and neither is pointing out that he's pretty much like every other politician ever,
despite his 'libertarian' label.
nope. not flamebait or trolling but pointing the myth of the LIA excuse
its not the first time he's parroted the 'war on xtians' bullshit
you could reduce taxes to zero, and it still wouldnt compensate for "wages too high".
youre a fool to cheerlead for the fool with the hairdo
not going to vote for him because he's a libertarian of principle when convenient,
and a serial flipflopper that abandons those principles when pressured.
"real americans" being people willing to earn starvation wages, and be subservient to the economy, instead using our power through our government of the people to make the economy serve us? yeah, fuck you
the market HAS been setting the wages...as low as it can.
and the result is a middle class that is shrinking, and has decreasing buying power, creating a self reinforcing cycle that continues to make people poorer.
Nope.
Wrong and moronic.
a global average 10C warmer than now is NOT mild and wet across the entire globe.
you truly have no bloody clue about what you speak.
First off, one paper doesn't immediately invalidate everything that came before it.
Secondly, no, I don't think you actually understood the paper or its point, but rather are projecting from it what you want to hear.
NASA Scientist Warned Deniers Would Distort His Antarctic Ice Study -- That's Exactly What They Did
Yes, stating that because its warmer than during the last freaking ice age everything is ok makes you look dumb.
Probably because you are, or you wouldn't spend your time trolling with such idiotic comments.
the best trolls are at least plausible, and have a degree of intelligence behind them.
yours are the equivalent of flinging feces at the wall.
The Middle east is already extremely hot, and at the edge of human endurance.
If, with no other changes, it also had added moisture, the humidity level would rise dramatically.
assuming this was stable (and it didn't get driven off by existing patterns), this would raise the total heat index considerably, potentially beyond human inhabitability.
In fact, there's another article on Slashdot about this very thing.
You should go read it.
Deserts have hot temperatures because they lack water to absorb the heat. A humid desert will stop being hot and stop being a desert.
The Stupid.
It burns!
http://www.skepticalscience.co...
So then you read about how Sandy caused ~40% more damage, both physical and economic, due to the increased storm surge, than it would have without said sea level rise, and similar effects on other storms on coastal areas?
No apparently, you didn't, because if you had you wouldn't need to have pointed out the precise reason WHY sea level rise biggest risk factor isn't the static avg sea level, but its effect on storm surges.
-Yes, it's warmer than it was during the last ice age.
-Yes, life existed during periods even warmer. But not current life, which evolved under climactic conditions that took millions of years to change....not a mere 200 years. It's not the presence of life, but the conditions it evolved under, and the rate at which it is capable of adapting to changing conditions, conditions that under natural cycles take millions of years to change.
(how many times are you going to repeat the same easily dismissed bits of moronic stupidity?)