There is only left and right, and Americans seem to think along these one dimensional lines.
Oh and the American definition of liberal is fucked up beyond all recognition. Which normally wouldn't bother me but the more retarded among my countrymen are starting to redefine the meaning of liberal in the UK as well.
By that logic, single children should be far more intelligent than others, right? Eh, no. That would only be the case if parental attention adds IQ points rather than the lack of it removing IQ points.
...in the coffin for the argument that these laws and regulations protect creators and innovators. Any laws. All laws are there for the benefit of the people who buy them.
You're assuming that the activity wouldn't cause a space based economy to develop. Things like space based factories, asteroid mining, space tourism. etc etc.
That kids at different points in the family structure get different amounts of parental attention. And that's just to start with. The firstborn gets usually, years of exclusive attention which the younger kids by definition can never have.
To function effectively. Depending on how many you can get on an access point it can work out cheaper. And compare with the cost of rolling out cat5 or fiber everywhere. Then there's the stuff you just can't do any other way. The big benefit of ubiquitous high bandwidth wifi though is that you can start to use it for all sorts of clever stuff.
e.g. Imagine taking one of those electronic paper book things out to the football field and showing the players a video of a play, with animated diagrams.
Then the engineers can take advantage of it too. Want a robogardener? Make the engineering departments big project to build a wireless PC into a powered lawn mower and the football field gets mowed twice a week.
It's invention which changes the world, not innovation. Broadband is a world changing technology, the computer is a world changing technology.
In the past, the pneumatic tyre, the internal combustion engine, the gas turbine etc.
Thing is, invention on it's own isn't enough. There are plenty of inventions languishing on the scrap heap. The key to the world changing part is economics.
Slashdot Mirror
This is why "the singularity" ain't going to happen.
Traditional lectures are abysmal teaching methods.
http://lowery.tamu.edu/Teaming/Morgan1/sld023.htm
Ah well, better get the printing presses running again.
They come pre-configured for high security.
Right. Another person who doesn't understand the difference between an original and a photocopy.
Tell you what, you go first.
That's what they're for.
Release it on the PC.
If the dollar continues to fall as it has over the last few years.
Data haven...
I have a $19.99 jammer.
HTH.
There is only left and right, and Americans seem to think along these one dimensional lines.
Oh and the American definition of liberal is fucked up beyond all recognition. Which normally wouldn't bother me but the more retarded among my countrymen are starting to redefine the meaning of liberal in the UK as well.
...in the coffin for the argument that these laws and regulations protect creators and innovators. Any laws. All laws are there for the benefit of the people who buy them.There's really only one way.
Build it yourself. Hardware and software. It kind of explains Bull.
You mean that our governments aren't already assuming that they do snoop?
Yeah, but what am I thinking? We're talking about politicians and bureaucrats here.
You're assuming that the activity wouldn't cause a space based economy to develop. Things like space based factories, asteroid mining, space tourism. etc etc.
That kids at different points in the family structure get different amounts of parental attention. And that's just to start with. The firstborn gets usually, years of exclusive attention which the younger kids by definition can never have.
It'd be http based. Not for efficiency or any technical reason, but because it's the best camouflage.
"I have people to do that for me".
To function effectively. Depending on how many you can get on an access point it can work out cheaper. And compare with the cost of rolling out cat5 or fiber everywhere. Then there's the stuff you just can't do any other way. The big benefit of ubiquitous high bandwidth wifi though is that you can start to use it for all sorts of clever stuff.
e.g. Imagine taking one of those electronic paper book things out to the football field and showing the players a video of a play, with animated diagrams.
Then the engineers can take advantage of it too. Want a robogardener? Make the engineering departments big project to build a wireless PC into a powered lawn mower and the football field gets mowed twice a week.
It's invention which changes the world, not innovation. Broadband is a world changing technology, the computer is a world changing technology.
In the past, the pneumatic tyre, the internal combustion engine, the gas turbine etc.
Thing is, invention on it's own isn't enough. There are plenty of inventions languishing on the scrap heap. The key to the world changing part is economics.
Assuming they can get it out on the PC sometime soon.