It obviously isn't accurate, as proven by the 1976 US Standard Atmosphere. Didn't you fucking notice? Just look at the fucking temperature at 50 km.
The temperature chart calculates a temperature of about -17C at 50 Km, with a pressure of about 5.4 mb. That's in line with everything else I can find. What do you think the temperature at 50 km is, anyway?
That calculator uses the fixed data from the standard atmosphere. Which fucking disagrees with Maxwell's theory - according to him it should be colder at 50km than at 25.. Will you get that into your skull already?
It's funny that neither you nor the morons you copied your little theory from realized that the Standard Atmosphere model disagrees with the true and only model to explain global warming ("Maxwell gravito-thermal mass/gravity/pressure theory of the 33C "greenhouse effect"" you just touted.
Not sure what you're trying to assert here. There is nothing in the "Maxwell gravito-thermal mass/gravity/pressure theory" that explains global warming - it's used to calculate the average global temperature of a planetary body, and does so very accurately without using "radiative forcing" as a feedback mechanism. That pretty much disproves radiative forcing, since the Maxwell theory is so accurate without it.
It obviously isn't accurate, as proven by the 1976 US Standard Atmosphere. Didn't you fucking notice? Just look at the fucking temperature at 50 km.
It's funny that neither you nor the morons you copied your little theory from realized that the Standard Atmosphere model disagrees with the true and only model to explain global warming ("Maxwell gravito-thermal mass/gravity/pressure theory of the 33C "greenhouse effect"" you just touted. FAIL.
BTW if you think "fixed" means constant, why the hell am I even talking to you?
The 1976 US Standard Atmosphere document and database (which still remains the gold standard today and has not changed despite 39 years of greenhouse gas emissions)
Funny how you suddenly favour a model that at its basis declares a fixed temperature distribution throughout the atmosphere. According to it, it should be exactly the same temperature all day and all year around at any place on Earth's surface. At least according to your interpretation of it.
Not hardly. I buy entire albums second-hand and on sale, on CD media. I generally pay $2-5 for them. Who in their right mind would pay a whole fucking dollar for each track???
You can buy whole albums on iTunes for the same amount, often samplers with dozens of songs on them. And unlike used CDs, they aren't scratched. And that's the price before paying with discounted iTunes cards.
As opposed to Windows' filesystems? Are they somehow a standard everybody must follow?
Well, FAT is basically the defacto standard since almost every random device supports it, so in the most important colloquial sense of the word standard, "Yes."
In the sense that people using it have to pay a fee. To the extend that Microsoft is the company making the biggest profit from Android.
Yeah, I can totally see why Apple is evil for not using FAT as the default files system.
>The people most allergic to peanuts refuse to eat peanut products.
In this case, the flaw exists in the person that is allergic to the peanuts. The peanuts did nothing wrong.
More importantly, calling for peanut free peanut butter just makes you sound like a rambling moron - which brings us back to Apple haters.
so.. Jobs worked on Atari..
that company which manufactured "personal computers"..
and some time later Jobs invented "personal computer"!
that is totally gay
Of course this was back when Atari didn't make "personal computers", but coin-ops. Heck, Atari shipped their first "personal" device, the Atari 2600 after Apple shipped the Apple II. And calling the 2600 a PC would be reaaaally stretching it.
The library on the iPod is a mirror of the one on the computer. The computer is the master device, and if you make changes to the library on the iPod, they will not be kept unless they are also made on the master library.
That's typical for Apple, to assume the hardware is entirely their domain and wipe and delete it's contents and only restore what was installed with their 'approved' application.
What would we be saying if a Windows device did this?
We'd be saying "Windows has asked to format disks with unknown (to it) file systems on it since the dawn of time, you idiot."
Sorry, of you can't see that when Real advertises that the DRMed music you buy from them will play on an iPod without problem, Apple will have to make sure it does - then you are obviously a fanboy.
Apple didn't fix their DRM, as the exploits allowing you to remove it carried on working just fine. They simply altered it slightly and repeatedly to keep Real from being compatible.
Bullshit. All Real had to do was not change their DRM to a copy of Apple's. But Real didn't want to not be proprietary. And it's no surprise that you are the one to defend them.
A federal judge Thursday questioned whether any of the plaintiffs in a long-running antitrust suit against Apple Inc. had actually bought the iPods at issue in the case.
“What am I supposed to do if I don’t have a plaintiff?” asked a concerned U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers after the jury left the courtroom at the end of Thursday’s proceedings.
Judge Rogers said that in a letter submitted to her late Wednesday night, Apple’s lawyers said there is no evidence that the plaintiffs’ two class representatives purchased the models of iPods focused on in the trial.
Judge Rogers’ comments raised the prospect that the 10-year-old case, in which the plaintiffs are seeking $350 million in damages, could end quickly in Apple’s favor.
so what should they have done? Just let those pieces of random garbage data take up space on the iPod for the rest of its life? Forced you to erase the whole thing just to get rid of them?
They should have gone with option 1, just left the non-working files on the device.
So they would have been sued for wasting space on iPods instead.
Google doesn't give me meaningfully different results if I use Microsoft's OS and Mozilla's web browser. I haven't tried this myself, but I hear you can use Google's browser and/or Google's OS to get the same results from Microsoft's search engine that you'd get if you were using the "Microsoft stack."
70% of your market buying your stuff is great. 70% of your market liking the thing they bought from you last year and not deciding to upgrade is a problem.
Why not? It's been our philosophy for centuries not to worry about the future and just expect that future generations will have more wits and basic decency than us.
All while complaining that the youths are worse in all ways than the previous generation.
You saw Steve Jobs near the current glass deal somewhere? It means Apple is not old Apple anymore. There is nobody in Apple anymore who could make other people believe in impossible things and then deliever it.
And yet GTAT did believe they could deliver. Odd that.
... Steve Jobs gave the 53-year-old Weeks a seemingly impossible task: Make millions of square feet of ultrathin, ultrastrong glass that didn’t yet exist. Oh, and do it in six months.
Slashdot Mirror
It obviously isn't accurate, as proven by the 1976 US Standard Atmosphere. Didn't you fucking notice? Just look at the fucking temperature at 50 km.
The temperature chart calculates a temperature of about -17C at 50 Km, with a pressure of about 5.4 mb. That's in line with everything else I can find. What do you think the temperature at 50 km is, anyway?
That calculator uses the fixed data from the standard atmosphere. Which fucking disagrees with Maxwell's theory - according to him it should be colder at 50km than at 25.. Will you get that into your skull already?
It's funny that neither you nor the morons you copied your little theory from realized that the Standard Atmosphere model disagrees with the true and only model to explain global warming ("Maxwell gravito-thermal mass/gravity/pressure theory of the 33C "greenhouse effect"" you just touted.
Not sure what you're trying to assert here. There is nothing in the "Maxwell gravito-thermal mass/gravity/pressure theory" that explains global warming - it's used to calculate the average global temperature of a planetary body, and does so very accurately without using "radiative forcing" as a feedback mechanism. That pretty much disproves radiative forcing, since the Maxwell theory is so accurate without it.
It obviously isn't accurate, as proven by the 1976 US Standard Atmosphere. Didn't you fucking notice? Just look at the fucking temperature at 50 km.
BTW if you think "fixed" means constant, why the hell am I even talking to you?
The 1976 US Standard Atmosphere document and database (which still remains the gold standard today and has not changed despite 39 years of greenhouse gas emissions)
Funny how you suddenly favour a model that at its basis declares a fixed temperature distribution throughout the atmosphere. According to it, it should be exactly the same temperature all day and all year around at any place on Earth's surface. At least according to your interpretation of it.
Not hardly. I buy entire albums second-hand and on sale, on CD media. I generally pay $2-5 for them. Who in their right mind would pay a whole fucking dollar for each track???
You can buy whole albums on iTunes for the same amount, often samplers with dozens of songs on them. And unlike used CDs, they aren't scratched. And that's the price before paying with discounted iTunes cards.
As opposed to Windows' filesystems? Are they somehow a standard everybody must follow?
Well, FAT is basically the defacto standard since almost every random device supports it, so in the most important colloquial sense of the word standard, "Yes."
In the sense that people using it have to pay a fee. To the extend that Microsoft is the company making the biggest profit from Android.
Yeah, I can totally see why Apple is evil for not using FAT as the default files system.
>The people most allergic to peanuts refuse to eat peanut products. In this case, the flaw exists in the person that is allergic to the peanuts. The peanuts did nothing wrong.
More importantly, calling for peanut free peanut butter just makes you sound like a rambling moron - which brings us back to Apple haters.
so.. Jobs worked on Atari.. that company which manufactured "personal computers".. and some time later Jobs invented "personal computer"!
that is totally gay
Of course this was back when Atari didn't make "personal computers", but coin-ops. Heck, Atari shipped their first "personal" device, the Atari 2600 after Apple shipped the Apple II. And calling the 2600 a PC would be reaaaally stretching it.
The library on the iPod is a mirror of the one on the computer. The computer is the master device, and if you make changes to the library on the iPod, they will not be kept unless they are also made on the master library.
That's typical for Apple, to assume the hardware is entirely their domain and wipe and delete it's contents and only restore what was installed with their 'approved' application.
What would we be saying if a Windows device did this?
We'd be saying "Windows has asked to format disks with unknown (to it) file systems on it since the dawn of time, you idiot."
You are trolling it wrong.
Why did you change the subject? Nobody mentioned a Windows box wiping a Mac filesystem. Does Apple really still use a proprietary filesystem??
As opposed to Windows' filesystems? Are they somehow a standard everybody must follow?
Sorry, of you can't see that when Real advertises that the DRMed music you buy from them will play on an iPod without problem, Apple will have to make sure it does - then you are obviously a fanboy.
Apple didn't fix their DRM, as the exploits allowing you to remove it carried on working just fine. They simply altered it slightly and repeatedly to keep Real from being compatible.
Bullshit. All Real had to do was not change their DRM to a copy of Apple's. But Real didn't want to not be proprietary. And it's no surprise that you are the one to defend them.
THAT is why many people avoid Apple like the plague. They've lost their lead, had their fun and are now fighting fowl.
Yup. Random mostly-unsubstantiated rumors that totally happened to a friend of your cousin's roommate are indeed why many people avoid Apple products.
More importantly, it now seems it never happened to any of the plaintiffs: http://online.wsj.com/articles/judge-questions-plaintiffs-in-apple-antitrust-case-1417734307?mod=ST1
A federal judge Thursday questioned whether any of the plaintiffs in a long-running antitrust suit against Apple Inc. had actually bought the iPods at issue in the case.
“What am I supposed to do if I don’t have a plaintiff?” asked a concerned U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers after the jury left the courtroom at the end of Thursday’s proceedings.
Judge Rogers said that in a letter submitted to her late Wednesday night, Apple’s lawyers said there is no evidence that the plaintiffs’ two class representatives purchased the models of iPods focused on in the trial.
Judge Rogers’ comments raised the prospect that the 10-year-old case, in which the plaintiffs are seeking $350 million in damages, could end quickly in Apple’s favor.
so what should they have done? Just let those pieces of random garbage data take up space on the iPod for the rest of its life? Forced you to erase the whole thing just to get rid of them?
They should have gone with option 1, just left the non-working files on the device.
So they would have been sued for wasting space on iPods instead.
Google doesn't give me meaningfully different results if I use Microsoft's OS and Mozilla's web browser. I haven't tried this myself, but I hear you can use Google's browser and/or Google's OS to get the same results from Microsoft's search engine that you'd get if you were using the "Microsoft stack."
Unless somebody pays Google that their products get "included" in the search results of their "topical" searches. http://marketingland.com/once-deemed-evil-google-now-embraces-paid-inclusion-13138
70% of your market buying your stuff is great. 70% of your market liking the thing they bought from you last year and not deciding to upgrade is a problem.
IOW Android is doomed.
In other news: A company so desperate to get into bed with Apple signs away their soul for rainbows and promises.
New entrepreneurs are always optimistic.
GTAT is a 20 years old company.
Why not? It's been our philosophy for centuries not to worry about the future and just expect that future generations will have more wits and basic decency than us.
All while complaining that the youths are worse in all ways than the previous generation.
Liar liar. Stop pulling "evidence" out of your ass.
So one more example that, in the corporate world, a verbal agreement isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
Who makes a 500 million dollar deal based on a verbal agreement? You also took GTAT's word hook, line, and sinker.
You saw Steve Jobs near the current glass deal somewhere? It means Apple is not old Apple anymore. There is nobody in Apple anymore who could make other people believe in impossible things and then deliever it.
And yet GTAT did believe they could deliver. Odd that.
In other news: A company so desperate to get into bed with Apple signs away their soul for rainbows and promises.
Yeah, we all know how bad that ended for Corning, who got suckered into massive investments to produce a formerly failed product by Apple. http://www.wired.com/2012/09/ff-corning-gorilla-glass/all/
Apple drank the beta kool-aid that science/engineering is 'magic'.
So your argument is that GTAT conned Apple?
So you finally admit that you don't know what you are talking about. Because they do.