These companies paid (made large investments) to collect this geospatial data.
If the government wants the data "nationalized", shouldn't the government make contracts to pay the companies to give away the data they collected?
Actually, the real question has to be: why the fuck doesn't the government already have all of that data, and give it to these (and other) companies? After all, the government is the one who planned and build those roads, and has detailed tax records of the buildings near these roads.
...I guess next time I'm looking for exceptionally grassy highway medians, I'll buy an Apple device....
Yes, go buy that device, Apple needs your help. There's probably a good reason why Apple switched to reporting revenue instead of unit device sales. The unit device sales are on a downward trend, so Apple has been raising the per-device price in order to keep revenue increasing. It's a good tactic until Apple's customer base gets wise to it.
Yeah, absolutely right - every single company that doesn't report sales has gone broke. Samsung, Huawei, Google, Dell, HP, etc. Every single one. The only thing that kept Apple afloat was reporting sales numbers.
If you are one out of 4500 newborns, you have ambiguous genitalia. Then the doctor decides willy-nilly wether you end up having a pee-pee or not. Better hope he decides right, or your life is fucked.
gartner and IDC don't use shipped numbers as they have no access to those, they base everything off retailer sales. Not sure why you think they aren't selling them. I see Surface devices everywhere nowadays.
I have yet to see a Surface device outside of a CBS show.
Errr no. You fundamentally failed to understand how Google's advertising model works.
You fundamentally fail to understand how information works. The advertisers have ways to uniquely identify you - and using Google's services, they can then find out things that Google knows about you. Google doesn't sell them that information - but when they ask to serve ads to group X, and you get the ad, they know you are member of group X. It is as simple as that.
Boy, that came out of left field, didn't it? Globalism is quite real.
Yaeh, it is. And it has nothing to do with Global Warming. And "Global Elite" is a dog whistle. Face what you are - I don't care if its a Nazi, an idiot, or both.
Im trying to figure out how $50 and $90 falls between $177 and $805. They state a range and then say the second highest country in the world only costs 1/4 of that, and the highest country is only half the lowest value of this range.
What's so hard to understand. The range is for the global (=total) cost, the two smaller are just for the US and India alone. How is that hard to understand - unless you admit you have no idea what you are talking about and are in no way qualified to enter a discussion about the costs of climate change.
All schemes involving cap and trade / carbon tax, etc is nothing more than a wealth redistribution scheme for the globalists to maintain a neo-feudalism form of global dominance, control, and oppression.
If you really wanted to tackle CO2, then dump every bit of R&D into Fusion Energy. NEVER will happen though as it negates the the real purpose as I've just stated above.
So how is that any different to what you just said you don't want? Giving lots of tax money to the globalist big energy firms.
Slashdot Mirror
My plants don't like sulfates. They told me so.
Well, they sure as hell like sunshine.
These companies paid (made large investments) to collect this geospatial data. If the government wants the data "nationalized", shouldn't the government make contracts to pay the companies to give away the data they collected?
Actually, the real question has to be: why the fuck doesn't the government already have all of that data, and give it to these (and other) companies? After all, the government is the one who planned and build those roads, and has detailed tax records of the buildings near these roads.
So it's made up, right? Like "alternative facts" are.
...I guess next time I'm looking for exceptionally grassy highway medians, I'll buy an Apple device....
Yes, go buy that device, Apple needs your help. There's probably a good reason why Apple switched to reporting revenue instead of unit device sales. The unit device sales are on a downward trend, so Apple has been raising the per-device price in order to keep revenue increasing. It's a good tactic until Apple's customer base gets wise to it.
Yeah, absolutely right - every single company that doesn't report sales has gone broke. Samsung, Huawei, Google, Dell, HP, etc. Every single one. The only thing that kept Apple afloat was reporting sales numbers.
Geez, what has happened to us?
As short as a decade ago, it was really easy.
You have a pee-pee, you're male gender.
If you don't, you are female.
If you are one out of 4500 newborns, you have ambiguous genitalia. Then the doctor decides willy-nilly wether you end up having a pee-pee or not. Better hope he decides right, or your life is fucked.
Then every instance of Republicans being harassed in public is the fault of Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, and CNN.
And every instance where a Nazi harasses a Democrat by running them over with their car is Trump's fault.
But yeah sure, same thing.
Democrats do spread the "Punch a Nazi" meme.
How many people have you Nazis killed by now?
"Is it too much to ask that Trump stop encouraging his supporters to violently attack reporters and Democrats?"
Is calling it a despicable act and condemning it enough? Because that's what Trump did.
Was that before or after he riled up chants to lock up Soros?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
It sounds like Apple specifically wants the Silego team. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
Considering all of the people changing over to Apple work in Europe - unlikely.
gartner and IDC don't use shipped numbers as they have no access to those, they base everything off retailer sales. Not sure why you think they aren't selling them. I see Surface devices everywhere nowadays.
I have yet to see a Surface device outside of a CBS show.
You're confusing issues here. Believe it or not, not everything is about Trump.
But that's what Trump keeps saying. You mean he's lying?
Errr no. You fundamentally failed to understand how Google's advertising model works.
You fundamentally fail to understand how information works. The advertisers have ways to uniquely identify you - and using Google's services, they can then find out things that Google knows about you. Google doesn't sell them that information - but when they ask to serve ads to group X, and you get the ad, they know you are member of group X. It is as simple as that.
Why would I want to read a "bible"? And if you don't want to be called a Nazi - don't talk like them.
but your data is sold to compensate for it.
No it's not. Google has never sold anyone's data,
Well, no - they just give it away for free inadvertently while selling targeted ads that use your data, and more.
The "Global Elite" exists. Their annual meeting is held at the World Economic Forum in Davos
Even if you actually believe that - it's called Capitalism. Those people meeting there aren't Communists. Get it into your Nazi/Idiot skull.
Metric crap-loads is more like it.
Boy, that came out of left field, didn't it? Globalism is quite real.
Yaeh, it is. And it has nothing to do with Global Warming. And "Global Elite" is a dog whistle. Face what you are - I don't care if its a Nazi, an idiot, or both.
Im trying to figure out how $50 and $90 falls between $177 and $805. They state a range and then say the second highest country in the world only costs 1/4 of that, and the highest country is only half the lowest value of this range.
What's so hard to understand. The range is for the global (=total) cost, the two smaller are just for the US and India alone. How is that hard to understand - unless you admit you have no idea what you are talking about and are in no way qualified to enter a discussion about the costs of climate change.
Climate change is the issue our globalist elites
So you admit you are just an anti-semite nut-job, without any arguments.
All schemes involving cap and trade / carbon tax, etc is nothing more than a wealth redistribution scheme for the globalists to maintain a neo-feudalism form of global dominance, control, and oppression.
If you really wanted to tackle CO2, then dump every bit of R&D into Fusion Energy. NEVER will happen though as it negates the the real purpose as I've just stated above.
So how is that any different to what you just said you don't want? Giving lots of tax money to the globalist big energy firms.
Warmer air tends to hold moisture better, doesn't it?
Yeah, that's why it's alway raining in deserts - it's warmer there after all.
It is 'typical' of most economic reports. The numbers are basically made up.
Yeah. Only the economic reports proving that caring about the environment will ruin the economy have the right numbers.
Apple is the OEM, so it was Apple that wrongly configured these chips.
You do know what that means: You can now no longer claim "Apple doesn't build their own computers".
Never ever talk to the police. Just as useful.