It's not a question of what the EO references - it's what Trump's intention is, and he made that intention clear with his own words. The court is certainly going to consider that in their decision.
The only thing that stands in Trump's way is that pesky first amendment, which prohibits the government establishment of religion. This was the basis for the Fourth Circuit's court stay against the ban. The notion that a President is allowed to use his power to limit immigration irrespective of his violation of other parts of the constitution in doing so is Bowling Green-type fairytale.
That way your body will know it's in a different time zone and automatically adjust. For example, if you're traveling from Europe to NYC, eat a Pastrami on Rye sandwich right after you land.
The article you linked compares Window's threads to Linux threads, both of which are implemented in a kernel-level thread implementation, so the document doesn't address the process vs thread question. As for security, separating browser sessions into processes vs threads doesn't achieve much - if a browser is compromised the persistence of that breach usually extends beyond one runtime session.
Slashdot Mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
As in "I Ran away from that country to get away from the heat".
How Inception-like.
Not according to the legal principal of legislative intent.
Except that it wasn't only "campaign rhetoric". Trump made statements after he become POTUS.
It's not a question of what the EO references - it's what Trump's intention is, and he made that intention clear with his own words. The court is certainly going to consider that in their decision.
It didn't require any wild imagination - the court used Trump's own words.
The only thing that stands in Trump's way is that pesky first amendment, which prohibits the government establishment of religion. This was the basis for the Fourth Circuit's court stay against the ban. The notion that a President is allowed to use his power to limit immigration irrespective of his violation of other parts of the constitution in doing so is Bowling Green-type fairytale.
Yeah, not so much.
Good to see the nicer, less-abusive side of Linus.
Indian sweat-shop programmers or bed bugs.
Ahem
To "No Paycheck" for many employees.
Seems to be the best application of AI yet.
That way your body will know it's in a different time zone and automatically adjust. For example, if you're traveling from Europe to NYC, eat a Pastrami on Rye sandwich right after you land.
Nope, my food doesn't taste any different. Then again, you can't taste hepatitis.
Echos are more productive, complain less, and don't show up to work with tattoos
Modern editors have an amazing feature which automatically inserts spaces whenever you hit the tab key.
Using spaces increased my earnings by 4x over tabs.
It feels cold and damp.
Why would a government agency spying on me have a reason to lie?
The article you linked compares Window's threads to Linux threads, both of which are implemented in a kernel-level thread implementation, so the document doesn't address the process vs thread question. As for security, separating browser sessions into processes vs threads doesn't achieve much - if a browser is compromised the persistence of that breach usually extends beyond one runtime session.
Why are they using 4 separate processes to improve load times of multiple tabs/windows instead of just multiple threads?
That's like saying 8-bit processors can't handle (signed) numbers above 128. The processors handle them fine. The programmers on the other hand...
Who said anything about a conspiracy? The risk of a deflationary death spiral ended years ago yet here we are at record-low interest rates.