whats the illegally part?, twitter, facebook, isp's have their rules, you dont like them, create your own isp to provide internet, your own hosting to provide servers, your own homepage to provide propaganda, you have the choice and tools to do that
you seem to think that scrum is everything or nothing, it is not, scrum belongs to the agile paradigm and one the things that many miss is that you can choose what yo follow and use and you have to suit it to the project and team
Scrum is still used, people dont understand that scrum is to be adapted to the people/software you are working on, many combine scrum or use just parts of it, I know alot of big companies that use a combination of waterfall and scrum when doing safety critical machinery and there is like here in our company were we use just parts of it, we made it fit how we work and what we are developing.
well that sounds alot like ufc beside the death thing, and I say alot instead of a lot and I know its wrong
but the thing is, if atleast two people are involved they are not making a decision that affects individually themselves, as one party is agreeing to not only be the one to get hurt\killed but also agreeing to hurt\kill the opposing party else even if both parties have agreed on it
well alot of people would probably use to much violence on defence and on the heat of the moment, there have been several cases of that here were people get convicted as they did more after the first punch
I would like to read the judgement on that, couldt not find it online, but I am not from the uk it might be blocked.
this could be as simple, he stabbed the robber once - OK , robber started fleeing and he stabs the robber 3 more times to make it fatal, make him the attacker, it is simple as that
Actually the fair trail has nothing to do with it as the EU would trust the USA the trail would be fair, the problem is as USA have death penalty, yes it is state wise and not all executions are even carried out, but that as there is a minute chance he could be sentenced to death then that will stop a extradition.
so does it affect anyone in the end?, because beside some people that really wants to really avoid getting their info handed to the gov the general populace, businesses\organisations and governments will know about this and still use that software because there is no other option or is the best economic option vs security
There's a catch, though: even if Apple is unable to hand over the data from your phone, it can (and will, if asked via a court order) hand over the data from your iTunes or iCloud account
?, as a developer I cant see how you cant build so the cant be unencrypted if it passes the servers we have control over, like apple, they have encryption on the phone that apple cant crack but when that message\data is passed\synced through apples servers they can allow other access to it.
this is what they probably are talking abou
I am just saying how some people will read the judgement and act on it and one probable consequence of that action will be that a third party will be hurt.
Problem is, people will read: I can shoot down a drone now, and they will use other things than a shotgun because they are dumb idiots how much I am against idiots who dont respect other peoples privacy this will probably lead to innocent being hurt
I have 100/10 and get 92,08 Mbit/s / 10,08 Mbit/s on a speedtest(local one). for that I pay about 21€ and no download cap
Download Speed: 43173 kbps (5396.6 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 9731 kbps (1216.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
I got from http://speedtest.usiwireless.c...
You are talking about posting pictures of others children, not the same thing of people posting photos of their children, yeah some person could do some photocrop of your own children pictures still.
because it "passes" * cough * through alot of vital organs and instead of passing through it gets concentrated up to toxic levels or react with other things inside the body?
my bad, the company needs to atleast notify the commerce department about it and the company can self verify that they comply with the safe harbour\eu-rules
Actually the companies dont need to show anything, a company can just transfer the data to the u.s if they want, if they are breeched or find that the data has been used to do some things that the treaty doesnt allow then the company might get shit for it, but thats about it and it is a big IF
just because Nasa would point out things that are wrong it doesnt mean he must change things to reflect 100% reality, it is not a documentary it is a movie that also have the job to capture the peoples interest, and by people I mean the majority of us and not just some nitpickers
he brings up alot of things that we have overcome
on
Let's Not Go To Mars
·
· Score: 1
he seems to bring up alot of things that we already have overcome, the only thing that would be the most problem is the health issues like "your body’s muscles, including your heart..." etc and the water problem
the thing I see is that we might aim for Mars but end up on the Moon first, people seem to think just because we didnt achieve the primary goal then a secondary goal is not a option, and doing\planning for something harsher will give a "easier" goal like settling on the moon a better chance of succeeding
Slashdot Mirror
I rather have it up my arse than having people think that scrum is all or nothing
whats the illegally part?, twitter, facebook, isp's have their rules, you dont like them, create your own isp to provide internet, your own hosting to provide servers, your own homepage to provide propaganda, you have the choice and tools to do that
you seem to think that scrum is everything or nothing, it is not, scrum belongs to the agile paradigm and one the things that many miss is that you can choose what yo follow and use and you have to suit it to the project and team
yes, this can happen alot, when this happen then the important thing is to have a competent scrum master\project leader who can say no
Scrum is still used, people dont understand that scrum is to be adapted to the people/software you are working on, many combine scrum or use just parts of it, I know alot of big companies that use a combination of waterfall and scrum when doing safety critical machinery and there is like here in our company were we use just parts of it, we made it fit how we work and what we are developing.
well that sounds alot like ufc beside the death thing, and I say alot instead of a lot and I know its wrong
but the thing is, if atleast two people are involved they are not making a decision that affects individually themselves, as one party is agreeing to not only be the one to get hurt\killed but also agreeing to hurt\kill the opposing party else even if both parties have agreed on it
well alot of people would probably use to much violence on defence and on the heat of the moment, there have been several cases of that here were people get convicted as they did more after the first punch
I would like to read the judgement on that, couldt not find it online, but I am not from the uk it might be blocked.
this could be as simple, he stabbed the robber once - OK , robber started fleeing and he stabs the robber 3 more times to make it fatal, make him the attacker, it is simple as that
Actually the fair trail has nothing to do with it as the EU would trust the USA the trail would be fair, the problem is as USA have death penalty, yes it is state wise and not all executions are even carried out, but that as there is a minute chance he could be sentenced to death then that will stop a extradition.
back door?, no they use their own keys to encrypt the stuff on *their* servers, thats not a back door, that is how it is
so does it affect anyone in the end?, because beside some people that really wants to really avoid getting their info handed to the gov the general populace, businesses\organisations and governments will know about this and still use that software because there is no other option or is the best economic option vs security
There's a catch, though: even if Apple is unable to hand over the data from your phone, it can (and will, if asked via a court order) hand over the data from your iTunes or iCloud account
maybe
I think they are talking about getting data that passes the server of said company that would have master keys to unlock it
?, as a developer I cant see how you cant build so the cant be unencrypted if it passes the servers we have control over, like apple, they have encryption on the phone that apple cant crack but when that message\data is passed\synced through apples servers they can allow other access to it.
this is what they probably are talking abou
I am just saying how some people will read the judgement and act on it and one probable consequence of that action will be that a third party will be hurt.
Problem is, people will read: I can shoot down a drone now, and they will use other things than a shotgun because they are dumb idiots
how much I am against idiots who dont respect other peoples privacy this will probably lead to innocent being hurt
I have 100/10 and get 92,08 Mbit/s / 10,08 Mbit/s on a speedtest(local one). for that I pay about 21€ and no download cap
Download Speed: 43173 kbps (5396.6 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 9731 kbps (1216.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
I got from http://speedtest.usiwireless.c...
if anything this will add just add a new database to help identify people
You are talking about posting pictures of others children, not the same thing of people posting photos of their children, yeah some person could do some photocrop of your own children pictures still.
this is the same what I am thinking, and\or the people on the board will start getting bribed
because it "passes" * cough * through alot of vital organs and instead of passing through it gets concentrated up to toxic levels or react with other things inside the body?
my bad, the company needs to atleast notify the commerce department about it and the company can self verify that they comply with the safe harbour\eu-rules
Actually the companies dont need to show anything, a company can just transfer the data to the u.s if they want, if they are breeched or find that the data has been used to do some things that the treaty doesnt allow then the company might get shit for it, but thats about it and it is a big IF
just because Nasa would point out things that are wrong it doesnt mean he must change things to reflect 100% reality, it is not a documentary it is a movie that also have the job to capture the peoples interest, and by people I mean the majority of us and not just some nitpickers
he seems to bring up alot of things that we already have overcome, the only thing that would be the most problem is the health issues like "your body’s muscles, including your heart..." etc and the water problem
the thing I see is that we might aim for Mars but end up on the Moon first, people seem to think just because we didnt achieve the primary goal then a secondary goal is not a option, and doing\planning for something harsher will give a "easier" goal like settling on the moon a better chance of succeeding