maybe they are trying to enter the weight of your mom
still not having to worry about memory management beats any language nowadays, we are making enough powerful computers nowadays to run a machine in a machine in a machine
I would not say its government run if the salaries comes from companies, but for starter it is weird to have it like a "government organization" in the first place
where is the smear campaign in this case or lobbying of said FDA by them, it seems they were doing what they were paid to do by the companies who put their money in it, promote eggs, heck even in their page they say that: http://www.aeb.org/about-aeb/a... , so this was not such much of a revelation of anything, specially when they have to release the information when asked to it seems it is way better them being a government organization than not
so they are doing what all businesses have done when they face other competition, how can this be anything new thing, the guardian seems to have a very slow day, mabe they ran out of click baits
as long as their are not spreading lies or misleading information about their own product or competition then there is nothing to see here
this
I tried to use altavista as long as I could, but in the end, the cluttered mess it became as time passed made me switch to google and when I switched, google was as good or better than altavista
1800 calories and you didnt loose weight?, with that training you are mentioning, that would make your loose weight and basically probably starve your muscle you would get less weight just because your body is eating its own muscles up.
fat cells are a bitch to get rid of, well they say you cant loose them, so if you are fat when growing up you will have more fat cells than if you had been "normal" weighted when growing up, and the only way to get rid of fat cells is to do liposuction, at adult age they can shrink when dieting, but not all of them will shrink and the fatter a cell is, it will more harder to shrink them
as you said you were training, did you then pull more and more weight and could do the cardio better?, because as said, muscles weights more than fat and at 1800 calories with that much training would have done more damage to a body than good and in that process lost weight
Why dont you do that?, it seems that you just seek that others do the job for you, you could put up that weight(well if needed) and then go on a "proper" regime + workout and see if it works?, its not like you need any special machines or equipment for that
look up Drew Manning, well he did more than just "proper" regimen
It is still a proper regimen, but the fat lazy bastards dont follow it correctly or at all but that doesnt invalidate the regimen, it is still correct.
The most important thing is that there is no universal "proper" regimen and they have to be adjusted to the individual, biological, social and economic.
Well if you do alot of exercise you will stay your weight or go up, because, you know what?, muscles weight more than fat * gasp *
Where was the drone operator, was he in the street to be asked?, did they knew who owned the drone at that point?, could they ask the drone to identify itself?, or could he talk with the drone operator through the drone?
How can I from ground know if the drone was to high up for me to been seen in clear?, there are different cameras that have good optic zoom, how do I know there is only one camera?, you are just trying to justify that the drone operator was correct on assumptions when this happened, you know now by the video of what the drone saw, but the thing is that you need to know this things when this was happening, not after
a lot of the discussion of the ones defending the drone operator seem to be on that what he did was ok becuase the drone was in high altitude, was not so long in the property etc, not what is legally, lets just wait for what the court says
and that he didnt ask for permission or warn his neighbourhood is fucking bad manner and rude
i think drones are cool and all, but with morons not checking out what is legal in the first place should have their drones taken away from them and charged if possible, morons like this destroy for the rest because this things lead to more draconian regulations
I would actually trust the major pornsites more than any politician to hold my cc-information, the thing is if someone links a good gallery of midget utensil porn to a smaller site where I would need to put my cc-information, should I trust it, if I never been there before?, I could either go with a loss of money or a loss of not seeing said porn.
I would say yes, if we are talking about the 80's you would have to had 3 things, tv, movie player, video cassette and electricity. None of them could go into your pocket, being carried around 24/7, cheap and have access to them all the time from wherever you are as a kid.
now we have laptops, smartphones and tablets and internet
i am more frustrated that *nix systems doesnt make a use of it, and just map the same stuff as windows where applicable, its like, we see you have a keyboard with the windows key, all of them?), lets not make use of it and let the user map it themself
Slashdot Mirror
maybe they are trying to enter the weight of your mom
still not having to worry about memory management beats any language nowadays, we are making enough powerful computers nowadays to run a machine in a machine in a machine
They are not emos?
I would not say its government run if the salaries comes from companies, but for starter it is weird to have it like a "government organization" in the first place
where is the smear campaign in this case or lobbying of said FDA by them, it seems they were doing what they were paid to do by the companies who put their money in it, promote eggs, heck even in their page they say that: http://www.aeb.org/about-aeb/a... , so this was not such much of a revelation of anything, specially when they have to release the information when asked to
it seems it is way better them being a government organization than not
so they are doing what all businesses have done when they face other competition, how can this be anything new thing, the guardian seems to have a very slow day, mabe they ran out of click baits
as long as their are not spreading lies or misleading information about their own product or competition then there is nothing to see here
this
I tried to use altavista as long as I could, but in the end, the cluttered mess it became as time passed made me switch to google and when I switched, google was as good or better than altavista
experiment or not, that he was arrested shows that he didnt have permission to fly there
yes I know the part that you get fat, then lazy
1800 calories and you didnt loose weight?, with that training you are mentioning, that would make your loose weight and basically probably starve your muscle you would get less weight just because your body is eating its own muscles up.
fat cells are a bitch to get rid of, well they say you cant loose them, so if you are fat when growing up you will have more fat cells than if you had been "normal" weighted when growing up, and the only way to get rid of fat cells is to do liposuction, at adult age they can shrink when dieting, but not all of them will shrink and the fatter a cell is, it will more harder to shrink them
as you said you were training, did you then pull more and more weight and could do the cardio better?, because as said, muscles weights more than fat and at 1800 calories with that much training would have done more damage to a body than good and in that process lost weight
Why dont you do that?, it seems that you just seek that others do the job for you, you could put up that weight(well if needed) and then go on a "proper" regime + workout and see if it works?, its not like you need any special machines or equipment for that
look up Drew Manning, well he did more than just "proper" regimen
It is still a proper regimen, but the fat lazy bastards dont follow it correctly or at all but that doesnt invalidate the regimen, it is still correct.
The most important thing is that there is no universal "proper" regimen and they have to be adjusted to the individual, biological, social and economic.
Well if you do alot of exercise you will stay your weight or go up, because, you know what?, muscles weight more than fat * gasp *
What kind of brain activity?, I doubt there is any cognitive function or that anything else than the brainstem keeps the fetus living at that stage
well here the abortion limit is set at 22 weeks, so the size of that would be a good limit as I posted just before
well here the abortion limit is set at 22 weeks, so the size of that would be a good limit
http://photographyisnotacrime.... here it shows it flew more just from a backyard to the closest neighbour
Where was the drone operator, was he in the street to be asked?, did they knew who owned the drone at that point?, could they ask the drone to identify itself?, or could he talk with the drone operator through the drone?
How can I from ground know if the drone was to high up for me to been seen in clear?, there are different cameras that have good optic zoom, how do I know there is only one camera?, you are just trying to justify that the drone operator was correct on assumptions when this happened, you know now by the video of what the drone saw, but the thing is that you need to know this things when this was happening, not after
a lot of the discussion of the ones defending the drone operator seem to be on that what he did was ok becuase the drone was in high altitude, was not so long in the property etc, not what is legally, lets just wait for what the court says
and that he didnt ask for permission or warn his neighbourhood is fucking bad manner and rude
i think drones are cool and all, but with morons not checking out what is legal in the first place should have their drones taken away from them and charged if possible, morons like this destroy for the rest because this things lead to more draconian regulations
Huh?, when was that the question, we are talking about percentage here
ahh my fault it did
hmm, I upgraded to w10, still firefox is my browser
I would actually trust the major pornsites more than any politician to hold my cc-information, the thing is if someone links a good gallery of midget utensil porn to a smaller site where I would need to put my cc-information, should I trust it, if I never been there before?, I could either go with a loss of money or a loss of not seeing said porn.
Can you type in your CC-info in reply so we can very that you are an adult and might be in slashdot
I would say yes, if we are talking about the 80's you would have to had 3 things, tv, movie player, video cassette and electricity. None of them could go into your pocket, being carried around 24/7, cheap and have access to them all the time from wherever you are as a kid.
now we have laptops, smartphones and tablets and internet
i am more frustrated that *nix systems doesnt make a use of it, and just map the same stuff as windows where applicable, its like, we see you have a keyboard with the windows key, all of them?), lets not make use of it and let the user map it themself
So can someone say implement this same stuff in JSON and then patent it for free use?
hm?