Not really. The browser still identifies itself as being IE11 although it now claims to render "like Gecko". This user agent doesn't hide anything. It is most likely for exactly what the article says it is for: to prevent servers sending it broken IE specific code created when IE couldn't render anything properly.
Most of the time I can't tell the difference. That is not why I use lossless. I use lossless audio because it means I can convert it between hundreds of different lossless formats and it is the exact same quality as it was when I started. It doesn't matter that every audio player I use requires a different audio format. 20 years down the line I can have changed audio formats as many times as I need to to take advantage of better compression or to achieve compatibility with a new player and I will still have high quality audio.
From the article "He said a quick fix for some complex frameworks could be to utilise two cookies for the login process."
How exactly would that help. Maybe I am just misunderstanding how the attack works but what is to stop the attacker stealing both cookies and using them?
On the most part I agree but what is professional about taking covert pictures of the people who have offended you and posting them online (also on her employers time may I point out)?
They got fired to and the jokes were not sexist. If it was jokes about vaginas then you would still say it was sexist against women right? In fact the jokes were sexual in nature but they weren't sexist at all. No one should have been fired and this just makes everyone look bad. The people who made the jokes look bad. The company they work for looks bad. The woman who reported them looks bad. The company she works for looks bad. Everybody looses.
I agree completely. I have no sympathy for anyone who purchased SimCity. EA has shown that they will screw over the consumer time and time again. You can't just keep buying from them and act all surprised when they pull their usual shit.
I block all ads by default but if the ads are non-intrusive (non-flash and don't constantly reload every 10 seconds) then I am happy to whitelist certain sites I frequent. Just by making the assurance that the ads are non-intrusive may well reduce the number of users that ad block.
To be fair I can sort of see Google's point. An application specific password is meant to be given to the application once and then never typed again, heavily reducing the chance of it being compromised. It should still not be possible to turn off 2 step auth or change the users password with one though but I have never assumed that it couldn't. Google makes it quite clear that the password grants full account access.
Kind of. It goes beyond the scope of a usual font because the emoticons are actually images that can be displayed in full color but they can be manipulated like a character in regular text because they are stored as a Unicode character.
If it goes beyond 5 days I would expect a reduced bill for the time the service was unusable that month. If I didn't get one I would definitely cancel.
I see the ridiculous attempt at equating piracy with theft has shown its ugly head again. This idea is bad for everyone any only serves to obstruct actual debate about the ethics behind intellectual property. People who post information about breaking the law (it isn't even the law everywhere by the way so don't just assume American laws should be enforced worldwide) are never going to be ashamed because the reason they post the information in the first place is because they disagree with the existence of the law. The law is not the law because it is morally right. The law is the law because of pressure from lobby groups.
Whilst it is not stealing it is not the same as non-commercial piracy either. It is a lot worse than that because of the fact that it is plagiarism and because of the fact that it is being used commercially.
Slashdot Mirror
I am not so sure. I think it could reach a plane that was landing (which this one was) but I doubt it could cause permanent blindness at that range.
Not really. The browser still identifies itself as being IE11 although it now claims to render "like Gecko". This user agent doesn't hide anything. It is most likely for exactly what the article says it is for: to prevent servers sending it broken IE specific code created when IE couldn't render anything properly.
Most of the time I can't tell the difference. That is not why I use lossless. I use lossless audio because it means I can convert it between hundreds of different lossless formats and it is the exact same quality as it was when I started. It doesn't matter that every audio player I use requires a different audio format. 20 years down the line I can have changed audio formats as many times as I need to to take advantage of better compression or to achieve compatibility with a new player and I will still have high quality audio.
"Well, that explains how my Yahoo account got hacked a couple of weeks ago." No.
From the article "He said a quick fix for some complex frameworks could be to utilise two cookies for the login process." How exactly would that help. Maybe I am just misunderstanding how the attack works but what is to stop the attacker stealing both cookies and using them?
On the most part I agree but what is professional about taking covert pictures of the people who have offended you and posting them online (also on her employers time may I point out)?
They got fired to and the jokes were not sexist. If it was jokes about vaginas then you would still say it was sexist against women right? In fact the jokes were sexual in nature but they weren't sexist at all. No one should have been fired and this just makes everyone look bad. The people who made the jokes look bad. The company they work for looks bad. The woman who reported them looks bad. The company she works for looks bad. Everybody looses.
Yes. It also mines Bitcoins.
Isn't that the answer to the question "How do you stay sane at work?"
I agree completely. I have no sympathy for anyone who purchased SimCity. EA has shown that they will screw over the consumer time and time again. You can't just keep buying from them and act all surprised when they pull their usual shit.
I block all ads by default but if the ads are non-intrusive (non-flash and don't constantly reload every 10 seconds) then I am happy to whitelist certain sites I frequent. Just by making the assurance that the ads are non-intrusive may well reduce the number of users that ad block.
With no swearing or racism either. What is happening on /. today?
Really? I just tried it and I get a basic page layout but no content.
To be fair I can sort of see Google's point. An application specific password is meant to be given to the application once and then never typed again, heavily reducing the chance of it being compromised. It should still not be possible to turn off 2 step auth or change the users password with one though but I have never assumed that it couldn't. Google makes it quite clear that the password grants full account access.
Kind of. It goes beyond the scope of a usual font because the emoticons are actually images that can be displayed in full color but they can be manipulated like a character in regular text because they are stored as a Unicode character.
It is basically a copyright free set of all the "official" emoticons.
xD
Fuck you.
I asked if they could put me through to Anonymous Coward but they didn't seem to know who you were. xD
Sure but it is still something you expect to be mentioned in the article.
But peruse!=persue.
Obviously it is not to do with US embassies in other countries.It is to do with other countries embassies in the US.
If it goes beyond 5 days I would expect a reduced bill for the time the service was unusable that month. If I didn't get one I would definitely cancel.
I see the ridiculous attempt at equating piracy with theft has shown its ugly head again. This idea is bad for everyone any only serves to obstruct actual debate about the ethics behind intellectual property. People who post information about breaking the law (it isn't even the law everywhere by the way so don't just assume American laws should be enforced worldwide) are never going to be ashamed because the reason they post the information in the first place is because they disagree with the existence of the law. The law is not the law because it is morally right. The law is the law because of pressure from lobby groups.
Whilst it is not stealing it is not the same as non-commercial piracy either. It is a lot worse than that because of the fact that it is plagiarism and because of the fact that it is being used commercially.