The issue with the $85 billion cut ( sequestration) is that it represents a 10% cut in spending for the current fiscal year. Which started in October. No govt. agencies implemented sequestration cuts in advance of sequestration so the 10% cuts for the year will be absorbed in the final six months of the fiscal year, which doubles the effect.
Also (and this was by design to make the prospect that much less palatable) the cuts are across the board. Agencies are not at liberty to decide what programs to make the cuts in.
When one buys a Treasury Bond, the proceeds to the sale go right into the Treasury. After which point the government spends it on whatever. When the bond is later cashed in, the proceeds com from the treasury. Yeah...
Sprint calls theirs "Airave" but all the major carriers have an equivalent femtocell base station that you can install in your home/office, using your wireline high speed internet as the backhaul. Inexplicably, they charge for both the device and add-on service, despite the fact that they offset the need to build more towers.
Final Fantasy? Pfft. Not the most valuable franchise in gaming by a longshot.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Rovio announced the 1 Billionth download of Angry Birds last May. Even the free versions make them money from embedded advertising, in addition to all the direct revenue from the paid versions. Don't even get me started on the revenue from merchandizing tie-ins (Anyone for a game of Angry Bird Star Wars Jenga? I'm serious, my son got that for Christmas.)
http://mashable.com/2012/05/09/angry-birds-1-billion-downloads/
You have clearly never owned or used a device with a retina display. The pixels being so small they aren't discernible makes the display look like part of the analog world, except a bright, sharp part of that world.
So when you buy a Thinkpad from Lenovo, 20% of which is owned by the People's Liberation Army, or a smartphone from Huawei, whose CEO used to run Chinese Intelligence, what do you think your money is supporting exactly?
Actually Lucas had the vision of the 9 episode story arc from the beginning. 20th Century Fox was giving Lucas the time of day on Star Wars because American Graffiti had made a shit-ton of money for Universal Pictures, after Fox had passed on the project. They weren't going to chance making the same mistake twice. At the same time though, you have to remember to the world they inhabited in 1975 when this pitch was taking place. With the notable exception of Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (and maybe Planet of the Apes), most sci-fi films up to that time had been cheesy, poorly made affairs that mostly served as money pits for the studios. Fox was optimistic to break even on their $11M investment on the strength of Lucas' involvement in the project, but envisioned nothing of the cultural phenomenon they were unleashing.
For his part, Lucas was keen to avoid overplaying his hand, knowing he'd be lucky to get funded for a single movie, let alone nine. Episode IV was chosen as it was the most self-contained, and most readily film-able, given the state of visual effects technology at that time. As originally filmed, what we today refer to as Episode IV was meant to stand alone. By the time it had earned $460M in gross receipts, Fox of course had a change of heart; thus the "Episode IV" was tacked on.
Or here: http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf
From pg. 138:
"Set whether iPhone updates the date and time automatically: Go to Settings > General > Date & Time, then turn Set Automatically on or off. If you set iPhone to update the time automatically, it gets the correct time over the cellular network and updates it for the time zone you’re in. Some carriers don’t support network time, so in some areas iPhone may not be able to automatically determine the local time.
iPhone gives you the option to turn time update on or off in the settings app. If turned on, the phone updates time from the carrier network. http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3920
I used to use a BlackBerry Bold 9650. That phone gave me the option to sync time to the BIS (BlackBerry Internet Service) my carrier, or not at all...
Exactly. My iPad 2 (which was bought back when iOS 4.2 was current) has been connected to a PC exactly twice. Once to activate it out of the box on iOS 4.2 and again to upgrade to iOS 5. My iPhone 4S, which shipped with iOS 5, and which has been upgraded to iOS 6, has never been plugged into a PC in the year I've had it. The take-rate on iOS 6 was ridiculous, with better than 50% of the entire installed base upgraded within a week of release. Android takes a year to get that.
Android was the product of an "Oh $#!+" moment when Google realized the world was migrating to mobile access of the internet, and they had no presence in that space. They did not want to be beholden to Apple for access to their mobile user-base. Google's effort in the mobile space is to generate a user-base more or less locked into Google's family of services. They're much more able to get their fingers into a platform that they control, and are thus better able to monetize the user-base's interaction with their services. Google will eventually and inevitably merge Android and ChromeOS into a single product line. Similarly, Apple will ultimately merge OS X and iOS. Just like Micro$0ft has basically already done with Windows 8.
These Android-makers customize/skin the Android experience for the simple reason that it's just about the only thing preventing their product from becoming completely commoditized just like Windows PC's have been in the past few years. They also lack the clout to tell the carriers to pound sand. Thus we get Android handsets with carrier-dictated bloatware because the carriers get incremental revenue off that stuff. Be it someone using AT&T Maps and paying $10/month because they can't tell the difference from the Google Maps icon, or because someone is paying $0.50 a unit to have their app pre-loaded on the phone. All this bloatware, plus the additional QA the carrier does on each new build, is why Android releases are so delayed. Note that iPhones are devoid of these specific issues (though they have their own different issues). Apple wisely told carriers to shove it where the sun don't shine, and Google was wise to follow The Late Steve's lead with their Nexus devices.
Actually, not to split hairs or anything, but there was a third factor was the Soviet declaration of War against Japan on August 8 (in violation of the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact, but in accordance with the Yalta agreement), and the Soviet invasion of Manchuria on August 9. Historians differ as to the relative weight of these two developments in terms of their motivating force towards Japan's surrender.
The generally accepted rationale for America's use of the bomb to drive Japanese surrender was to avoid loss of life associated with the invasion of the Japanese mainland (codenamed Operation Downfall). This invasion, had it been mounted, would have involved an amphibious landings double the size of Operation Overlord in Normandy, which was itself the largest amphibious assault in the history of warfare. Allied planners anticipated heavy casualties on both sides as the defending Japanese military (and even civilian population) would fanatically defend the Japanese homeland to the last man.
You mean like the Bada OS they've already released hardware for? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bada
Reliance on the Android OS severely limits manufacturers' ability to differentiate their products. All they can really do is re-skin the UI... Thus begins a race to the bottom on price. This benefits Google, as it grows the user-base of their OS (and thus their ability to monetize its users) but for hardware makers it's a race to the bottom, price-wise. Samsung only makes money because they're spending lavishly on marketing. Don't get me wrong, the GS3 is a great Android phone, but people are buying it over competitor devices from HTC, LG, etc. mainly due to brand recognition from having been inundated by the ads. Motorola is pursuing a similar strategy, but is hamstrung by the fact that they basically only make CDMA devices.
It would seem someone from Apple Retail took a walk through one of the many shopping malls their stores are located in, and got a load of this:
http://content.microsoftstore.com/home.aspx
I walk in, and know I'm in a Microsoft Store, not an Apple Store, but my gosh does it reek of being a blatant rip-off. Higher fidelity to the original than most Microsoft rip-offs, too...
Well I've got a BlackBerry Bold in my junk-pile, and have to take a butter-knife to the battery to pry it out...
And you're carrying a backpack, and a vest with pockets, and are concerned about the bulk of your phone?! Really?
Meanwhile, here in the "real world" the hardware devices you've mentioned have been completely commoditized. Audio chipsets? Really? They all offer 7.1 line-level input and output and something like 90dB S/N ratio. Hard drives are similarly a commodity, and all perform basically the same. They don't know because, quite frankly, you're the first person to go in and actually ask them about that...
Personally, I liked the Abrams Star Trek movie. It broke the curse of odd-numbered Trek movies sucking. Very entertaining, and much better production values then the last several Trek films. That said, the desire to capture scenes "in camera" did lead to some questionable filming locations (Engineering in a brewery, really?!) And when, on the DVD commentary track, the man himself is making fun of how much he overused the lens flare effect, you know something is going on...
I've always given the movies a pass in terms of series continuity and adherence to the "rules" of Star Trek. For example, In Star Trek III Scotty rigs the Enterprise so the entire ship can be flown from the bridge by a crew of, like, 6 people. No crew needed here! Oh, and let's not forget how, in Star Trek V the ship had something like 78 decks. Or how in Star Trek VI the they rig a torpedo to sniff out the Klingon Bird of Prey using equipment they had on board to catalog gaseous anomalies, except it was actually Excelsior that was cataloging the anomalies. And have you seen the TNG episode "Relics"?! The man maintained himself in suspended animation in the damned pattern buffer for 75 YEARS! Transwarp beaming is nothing after that. Besides, Spock's future self gave Scotty the formula.
802.11a has been at 5GHz for a decade. Unfortunately, none of the early 802.11a equipment was backward compatible with the (at the time) more widely deployed 802.11b. 802.11a/b solutions eventually became available, but by then the 802.11g ship had sailed. 802.11g provided a-level speed combined with backward compatibility to b-level and at a much lower cost.
And what phone (with a user-replaceable battery) do you have that allows you to swap out the battery without fiddling with the case of the phone? It's been my experience that, in response to phones breaking apart into 3 pieces when dropped, manufacturers have started making the back panels more securely attached, and the batteries as well. To the point of interference fit on a BlackBerry Bold I used to have.
Not to mention all these batteries add bulk you're carrying around, too boot. Sort of like the Mophie Juice case you're not going for as an alternative.
It's been my experience with Apple products that, by the time the battery is so hosed you want to replace it, the product it is installed in is so far outdated that you want to replace the whole damn thing anyhow...
The Apple walled garden results in a more failsafe user experience compared to alternatives such as Android. The higher price-points of their devices also attract a customer-base that is not averse to actually purchasing apps. In addition to a user-base more inclined to buy apps to begin with, the walled garden virtually eliminates malware, and greatly reduces the level of piracy of paid apps. Developers can make money on the iOS platform much more readily than on Android, despite the smaller marketshare. For me as a user, this translates directly into higher quality, more usable and polished apps on iOS compared to Android.
Apple actively combats jailbreaking as a proxy war against app piracy, third-party in-app purchase capability, and unauthorized wifi tethering. The first one is Apple protecting the value of their platform, the second is protecting their bottom line, and the third is carrier placation.
Slashdot Mirror
The issue with the $85 billion cut ( sequestration) is that it represents a 10% cut in spending for the current fiscal year. Which started in October. No govt. agencies implemented sequestration cuts in advance of sequestration so the 10% cuts for the year will be absorbed in the final six months of the fiscal year, which doubles the effect. Also (and this was by design to make the prospect that much less palatable) the cuts are across the board. Agencies are not at liberty to decide what programs to make the cuts in.
When one buys a Treasury Bond, the proceeds to the sale go right into the Treasury. After which point the government spends it on whatever. When the bond is later cashed in, the proceeds com from the treasury. Yeah...
Sprint calls theirs "Airave" but all the major carriers have an equivalent femtocell base station that you can install in your home/office, using your wireline high speed internet as the backhaul. Inexplicably, they charge for both the device and add-on service, despite the fact that they offset the need to build more towers.
Final Fantasy? Pfft. Not the most valuable franchise in gaming by a longshot. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Rovio announced the 1 Billionth download of Angry Birds last May. Even the free versions make them money from embedded advertising, in addition to all the direct revenue from the paid versions. Don't even get me started on the revenue from merchandizing tie-ins (Anyone for a game of Angry Bird Star Wars Jenga? I'm serious, my son got that for Christmas.) http://mashable.com/2012/05/09/angry-birds-1-billion-downloads/
You have clearly never owned or used a device with a retina display. The pixels being so small they aren't discernible makes the display look like part of the analog world, except a bright, sharp part of that world.
So when you buy a Thinkpad from Lenovo, 20% of which is owned by the People's Liberation Army, or a smartphone from Huawei, whose CEO used to run Chinese Intelligence, what do you think your money is supporting exactly?
Actually Lucas had the vision of the 9 episode story arc from the beginning. 20th Century Fox was giving Lucas the time of day on Star Wars because American Graffiti had made a shit-ton of money for Universal Pictures, after Fox had passed on the project. They weren't going to chance making the same mistake twice. At the same time though, you have to remember to the world they inhabited in 1975 when this pitch was taking place. With the notable exception of Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (and maybe Planet of the Apes), most sci-fi films up to that time had been cheesy, poorly made affairs that mostly served as money pits for the studios. Fox was optimistic to break even on their $11M investment on the strength of Lucas' involvement in the project, but envisioned nothing of the cultural phenomenon they were unleashing. For his part, Lucas was keen to avoid overplaying his hand, knowing he'd be lucky to get funded for a single movie, let alone nine. Episode IV was chosen as it was the most self-contained, and most readily film-able, given the state of visual effects technology at that time. As originally filmed, what we today refer to as Episode IV was meant to stand alone. By the time it had earned $460M in gross receipts, Fox of course had a change of heart; thus the "Episode IV" was tacked on.
Or here: http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf From pg. 138: "Set whether iPhone updates the date and time automatically: Go to Settings > General > Date & Time, then turn Set Automatically on or off. If you set iPhone to update the time automatically, it gets the correct time over the cellular network and updates it for the time zone you’re in. Some carriers don’t support network time, so in some areas iPhone may not be able to automatically determine the local time.
iPhone gives you the option to turn time update on or off in the settings app. If turned on, the phone updates time from the carrier network. http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3920 I used to use a BlackBerry Bold 9650. That phone gave me the option to sync time to the BIS (BlackBerry Internet Service) my carrier, or not at all...
Exactly. My iPad 2 (which was bought back when iOS 4.2 was current) has been connected to a PC exactly twice. Once to activate it out of the box on iOS 4.2 and again to upgrade to iOS 5. My iPhone 4S, which shipped with iOS 5, and which has been upgraded to iOS 6, has never been plugged into a PC in the year I've had it. The take-rate on iOS 6 was ridiculous, with better than 50% of the entire installed base upgraded within a week of release. Android takes a year to get that.
Android was the product of an "Oh $#!+" moment when Google realized the world was migrating to mobile access of the internet, and they had no presence in that space. They did not want to be beholden to Apple for access to their mobile user-base. Google's effort in the mobile space is to generate a user-base more or less locked into Google's family of services. They're much more able to get their fingers into a platform that they control, and are thus better able to monetize the user-base's interaction with their services. Google will eventually and inevitably merge Android and ChromeOS into a single product line. Similarly, Apple will ultimately merge OS X and iOS. Just like Micro$0ft has basically already done with Windows 8.
These Android-makers customize/skin the Android experience for the simple reason that it's just about the only thing preventing their product from becoming completely commoditized just like Windows PC's have been in the past few years. They also lack the clout to tell the carriers to pound sand. Thus we get Android handsets with carrier-dictated bloatware because the carriers get incremental revenue off that stuff. Be it someone using AT&T Maps and paying $10/month because they can't tell the difference from the Google Maps icon, or because someone is paying $0.50 a unit to have their app pre-loaded on the phone. All this bloatware, plus the additional QA the carrier does on each new build, is why Android releases are so delayed. Note that iPhones are devoid of these specific issues (though they have their own different issues). Apple wisely told carriers to shove it where the sun don't shine, and Google was wise to follow The Late Steve's lead with their Nexus devices.
Actually, not to split hairs or anything, but there was a third factor was the Soviet declaration of War against Japan on August 8 (in violation of the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact, but in accordance with the Yalta agreement), and the Soviet invasion of Manchuria on August 9. Historians differ as to the relative weight of these two developments in terms of their motivating force towards Japan's surrender. The generally accepted rationale for America's use of the bomb to drive Japanese surrender was to avoid loss of life associated with the invasion of the Japanese mainland (codenamed Operation Downfall). This invasion, had it been mounted, would have involved an amphibious landings double the size of Operation Overlord in Normandy, which was itself the largest amphibious assault in the history of warfare. Allied planners anticipated heavy casualties on both sides as the defending Japanese military (and even civilian population) would fanatically defend the Japanese homeland to the last man.
You mean like the Bada OS they've already released hardware for? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bada Reliance on the Android OS severely limits manufacturers' ability to differentiate their products. All they can really do is re-skin the UI... Thus begins a race to the bottom on price. This benefits Google, as it grows the user-base of their OS (and thus their ability to monetize its users) but for hardware makers it's a race to the bottom, price-wise. Samsung only makes money because they're spending lavishly on marketing. Don't get me wrong, the GS3 is a great Android phone, but people are buying it over competitor devices from HTC, LG, etc. mainly due to brand recognition from having been inundated by the ads. Motorola is pursuing a similar strategy, but is hamstrung by the fact that they basically only make CDMA devices.
It would seem someone from Apple Retail took a walk through one of the many shopping malls their stores are located in, and got a load of this: http://content.microsoftstore.com/home.aspx I walk in, and know I'm in a Microsoft Store, not an Apple Store, but my gosh does it reek of being a blatant rip-off. Higher fidelity to the original than most Microsoft rip-offs, too...
Well I've got a BlackBerry Bold in my junk-pile, and have to take a butter-knife to the battery to pry it out... And you're carrying a backpack, and a vest with pockets, and are concerned about the bulk of your phone?! Really?
Meanwhile, here in the "real world" the hardware devices you've mentioned have been completely commoditized. Audio chipsets? Really? They all offer 7.1 line-level input and output and something like 90dB S/N ratio. Hard drives are similarly a commodity, and all perform basically the same. They don't know because, quite frankly, you're the first person to go in and actually ask them about that...
Personally, I liked the Abrams Star Trek movie. It broke the curse of odd-numbered Trek movies sucking. Very entertaining, and much better production values then the last several Trek films. That said, the desire to capture scenes "in camera" did lead to some questionable filming locations (Engineering in a brewery, really?!) And when, on the DVD commentary track, the man himself is making fun of how much he overused the lens flare effect, you know something is going on... I've always given the movies a pass in terms of series continuity and adherence to the "rules" of Star Trek. For example, In Star Trek III Scotty rigs the Enterprise so the entire ship can be flown from the bridge by a crew of, like, 6 people. No crew needed here! Oh, and let's not forget how, in Star Trek V the ship had something like 78 decks. Or how in Star Trek VI the they rig a torpedo to sniff out the Klingon Bird of Prey using equipment they had on board to catalog gaseous anomalies, except it was actually Excelsior that was cataloging the anomalies. And have you seen the TNG episode "Relics"?! The man maintained himself in suspended animation in the damned pattern buffer for 75 YEARS! Transwarp beaming is nothing after that. Besides, Spock's future self gave Scotty the formula.
Most of the money Carrie Fisher made in the original trilogy went up her nose unfortunately. Hence she hasn't aged well...
802.11a has been at 5GHz for a decade. Unfortunately, none of the early 802.11a equipment was backward compatible with the (at the time) more widely deployed 802.11b. 802.11a/b solutions eventually became available, but by then the 802.11g ship had sailed. 802.11g provided a-level speed combined with backward compatibility to b-level and at a much lower cost.
And this is different from any other major, publicly held company how exactly?
Yeah, Android has piss-poor power management, so turning it off actually helps your cause...
And what phone (with a user-replaceable battery) do you have that allows you to swap out the battery without fiddling with the case of the phone? It's been my experience that, in response to phones breaking apart into 3 pieces when dropped, manufacturers have started making the back panels more securely attached, and the batteries as well. To the point of interference fit on a BlackBerry Bold I used to have. Not to mention all these batteries add bulk you're carrying around, too boot. Sort of like the Mophie Juice case you're not going for as an alternative.
It's been my experience with Apple products that, by the time the battery is so hosed you want to replace it, the product it is installed in is so far outdated that you want to replace the whole damn thing anyhow...
The Apple walled garden results in a more failsafe user experience compared to alternatives such as Android. The higher price-points of their devices also attract a customer-base that is not averse to actually purchasing apps. In addition to a user-base more inclined to buy apps to begin with, the walled garden virtually eliminates malware, and greatly reduces the level of piracy of paid apps. Developers can make money on the iOS platform much more readily than on Android, despite the smaller marketshare. For me as a user, this translates directly into higher quality, more usable and polished apps on iOS compared to Android. Apple actively combats jailbreaking as a proxy war against app piracy, third-party in-app purchase capability, and unauthorized wifi tethering. The first one is Apple protecting the value of their platform, the second is protecting their bottom line, and the third is carrier placation.