Wedge foam acoustic panels have been around a long time in sound studios. It's cool that they have rediscovered the idea in dirt and are building the idea into landscape art.
Trying to force more people to live in the absence of resources? You're basically still killing people, you're simply distancing yourselves from the act and washing your hands of the responsibility. Maybe the person who dies will not be the one who can afford longevity treatments; more likely it will be some poor bastard with a different skin color and hat in some distant foreign land. This doesn't seem to worry the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
On the whole, it would probably be more humane to just have everyone in the world play Russian Roulette once a year and thin the herd by 1/6th annually. Oh, wait, that would offend the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
Better yet, don't kill anyone, and incentivize population control. Oh, wait, that would offend the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
Maybe the best strategy is not to play the game (i.e. let people die naturally)? Even now we can prolong life medically for people that are effectively invalids and/or in chronic pain, but to what advantage? Many of them would be happy to be allowed to pass away. When medical care rises to the level that these people actually want to continue living, then maybe we can talk about longevity.
How many people mentally tune out radio, TV, and online ads these days? When ads come up, that is the cue that paying attention is not important. It's a trained response to a lot of people. Advertisers don't get this and think more is better, because more!
Deliberately trying to think back to the last ad that made any sort of impression, the only one I can recall was one a few months ago; a poster ad in San Juan PR which had a picture of a fine looking woman with a very nice bottom holding a plate with a delicious-looking juicy steak on it. But I'm damned if I know what exactly was being advertised or by what company. Even though I remember that, was that successful advertising?
EROI still matters as that basically tells energy investors where they will get the biggest return for their money.
The trick is that the EROI for fossil fuels is decreasing as all the easy reserves have been tapped. We're mucking around with high tech dynamically positioned rigs for deep water drilling, oil sands, etc... that require more energy and effort to obtain. The EROI for coal has been depressed artificially due to environmental regulations and CO2 rules, but there are still ample reserves. The EROI for wind and solar should be relatively flat, even rising slightly if the technologies improve.
At some point the fossil fuel EROIs will fall below the EROIs for renewables. It's just a matter of when. Whether you invest in renewables now or later really depends on your perception of the outlook for these energy sources.
The thing to keep in mind is, low EROIs mean low net power production. An EROI of 1.01 is energetically feasible, but it means you are only getting a net surplus of 0.01 units of energy for your 1 unit of effort. That 0.01 is what you get to power your society with. If you are using a technology with an EROI of 1.01, it means you will need a LOT of that technology to power society. You will actually need nearly 2X a LOT of that technology as you need nearly the same amount of power to simply make the technology.
Maybe, but this won't catch a lot of failures caused by corrosion or fatigue cracking, or under-designed structures that are built with excessive static deflections from the get go. Many times the first excessive deflection is the one that sends the bridge into the river. Even if this worked as advertised, it does not replace visual inspection for defects.
Look at the I-35W bridge failure in Minnesota as a case in point. Sadly, this bridge *had* been inspected visually, numerous times, and was found to be structurally deficient by design, with cracking, corrosion, and bowed gusset plates all seen and photographically recorded prior to the collapse. It was cheaper to simply schedule periodic inspections, but the inspections never triggered the required (and costly) corrections that were needed. A peak load due to construction materials and gridlocked traffic was the last straw. All the GPS and satellites in the world can't cure human stupidity.
The author of TFA doesn't have a clue. This idea is useless as bridges, particularly suspension bridges, deflect by much more than 1 cm under traffic and wind loads.
Here is a time lapse video of the Manhattan bridge to illustrate normal deflections:
If the concrete fills it's own cracks automagically, two questions spring to mind: 1) Will the crack-filling material have the same load bearing properties or (as I suspect) it will be much weaker at those spots, and 2) will the filled cracks disguise the facts that the object may be under a load that was not anticipated by the designer (tensile or bending loads vs. compressive loads)?
Reinforced concrete is often used in bending and tensile load applications in architecture, and if the reinforcing is not stiff enough cracks often will appear on the surface. They are unsightly, but if the reinforcing is taking the load (as it should) these are not structural deficiencies. But for complex architectural domes and shells, the presence and size of these cracks is something that needs to be monitored.
If the concrete is used in a container and it cracks, we may actually want to see the crack as that is a warning that something is being loaded in an unanticipated way. Hiding it with a self-filling mechanism may not be desirable.
No, one can be pardoned even before being indicted. See Ford's pardon of Nixon for an example. The presidential pardon is a pretty powerful tool, but the president can't wield it too freely as there is great potential for political backlash against the party.
If a Republican gets the White House in 2016 (or even if they don't), I hope Obama mans up and pardons Snowden and Manning and others who blew the whistle on this. It would be one of the few things he could do to redeem his half-assed presidency IMO, but I am not holding my breath.
If a spy agency stops collecting data on you...how do you actually know?
Strangely enough, having a bunch of politicians say "We voted against it, so we won't collect data on you, promise!" really doesn't seem too compelling to me.
I think I will be keeping my tinfoil hat on with chin strap secured, thank you very much.
Slashdot Mirror
Looking to score the next Score:5, Funny
Then stop making Score: 5, Insightful comments!
Dammit, I knew I was going about it all wrong.
Wedge foam acoustic panels have been around a long time in sound studios. It's cool that they have rediscovered the idea in dirt and are building the idea into landscape art.
Talk about a dead link.
Trying to force more people to live in the absence of resources? You're basically still killing people, you're simply distancing yourselves from the act and washing your hands of the responsibility. Maybe the person who dies will not be the one who can afford longevity treatments; more likely it will be some poor bastard with a different skin color and hat in some distant foreign land. This doesn't seem to worry the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
On the whole, it would probably be more humane to just have everyone in the world play Russian Roulette once a year and thin the herd by 1/6th annually. Oh, wait, that would offend the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
Better yet, don't kill anyone, and incentivize population control. Oh, wait, that would offend the people who believe that bearded men live in the sky.
Maybe the best strategy is not to play the game (i.e. let people die naturally)? Even now we can prolong life medically for people that are effectively invalids and/or in chronic pain, but to what advantage? Many of them would be happy to be allowed to pass away. When medical care rises to the level that these people actually want to continue living, then maybe we can talk about longevity.
Death is not a bad option, really.
"These aren't the salamis you are looking for.."
How many people mentally tune out radio, TV, and online ads these days? When ads come up, that is the cue that paying attention is not important. It's a trained response to a lot of people. Advertisers don't get this and think more is better, because more! Deliberately trying to think back to the last ad that made any sort of impression, the only one I can recall was one a few months ago; a poster ad in San Juan PR which had a picture of a fine looking woman with a very nice bottom holding a plate with a delicious-looking juicy steak on it. But I'm damned if I know what exactly was being advertised or by what company. Even though I remember that, was that successful advertising?
Mars One is a bunch of useless bloody loonies!
The Brainteaser Elon Musk Used To Ask New SpaceX Engineers, Because His Old Question Got Slashdotted.
Thanks jerks!
Well done sir! Excellent post. Wish I could mod you to +6.
EROI still matters as that basically tells energy investors where they will get the biggest return for their money.
The trick is that the EROI for fossil fuels is decreasing as all the easy reserves have been tapped. We're mucking around with high tech dynamically positioned rigs for deep water drilling, oil sands, etc... that require more energy and effort to obtain. The EROI for coal has been depressed artificially due to environmental regulations and CO2 rules, but there are still ample reserves. The EROI for wind and solar should be relatively flat, even rising slightly if the technologies improve.
At some point the fossil fuel EROIs will fall below the EROIs for renewables. It's just a matter of when. Whether you invest in renewables now or later really depends on your perception of the outlook for these energy sources.
The thing to keep in mind is, low EROIs mean low net power production. An EROI of 1.01 is energetically feasible, but it means you are only getting a net surplus of 0.01 units of energy for your 1 unit of effort. That 0.01 is what you get to power your society with. If you are using a technology with an EROI of 1.01, it means you will need a LOT of that technology to power society. You will actually need nearly 2X a LOT of that technology as you need nearly the same amount of power to simply make the technology.
Maybe, but this won't catch a lot of failures caused by corrosion or fatigue cracking, or under-designed structures that are built with excessive static deflections from the get go. Many times the first excessive deflection is the one that sends the bridge into the river. Even if this worked as advertised, it does not replace visual inspection for defects.
Look at the I-35W bridge failure in Minnesota as a case in point. Sadly, this bridge *had* been inspected visually, numerous times, and was found to be structurally deficient by design, with cracking, corrosion, and bowed gusset plates all seen and photographically recorded prior to the collapse. It was cheaper to simply schedule periodic inspections, but the inspections never triggered the required (and costly) corrections that were needed. A peak load due to construction materials and gridlocked traffic was the last straw. All the GPS and satellites in the world can't cure human stupidity.
The author of TFA doesn't have a clue. This idea is useless as bridges, particularly suspension bridges, deflect by much more than 1 cm under traffic and wind loads.
Here is a time lapse video of the Manhattan bridge to illustrate normal deflections:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgXveBf_l6k
The majority of cats don't eat the birds.
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cats_actually_kill
And to head off the OCD pedants, I accidentally said "it's" when it should have been "its". Get over it.
If the concrete fills it's own cracks automagically, two questions spring to mind: 1) Will the crack-filling material have the same load bearing properties or (as I suspect) it will be much weaker at those spots, and 2) will the filled cracks disguise the facts that the object may be under a load that was not anticipated by the designer (tensile or bending loads vs. compressive loads)?
Reinforced concrete is often used in bending and tensile load applications in architecture, and if the reinforcing is not stiff enough cracks often will appear on the surface. They are unsightly, but if the reinforcing is taking the load (as it should) these are not structural deficiencies. But for complex architectural domes and shells, the presence and size of these cracks is something that needs to be monitored.
If the concrete is used in a container and it cracks, we may actually want to see the crack as that is a warning that something is being loaded in an unanticipated way. Hiding it with a self-filling mechanism may not be desirable.
Well played sir, well played.
Warm bloodedness is a survival adaption owing to human's adversion to warm sushi. I bet these fry up wonderfully though.
http://programming-motherfucker.com/
Or we could just use paper ballots that simply work.
Why the need to push technology into places where it is not needed and it doesn't improve the process??
No, one can be pardoned even before being indicted. See Ford's pardon of Nixon for an example. The presidential pardon is a pretty powerful tool, but the president can't wield it too freely as there is great potential for political backlash against the party.
If a Republican gets the White House in 2016 (or even if they don't), I hope Obama mans up and pardons Snowden and Manning and others who blew the whistle on this. It would be one of the few things he could do to redeem his half-assed presidency IMO, but I am not holding my breath.
If a spy agency stops collecting data on you...how do you actually know?
Strangely enough, having a bunch of politicians say "We voted against it, so we won't collect data on you, promise!" really doesn't seem too compelling to me.
I think I will be keeping my tinfoil hat on with chin strap secured, thank you very much.
The solution: leave the phone at work when you are off duty.
Coruscant Geonosis can be treated with Bespin.
Image stabilized video from Apollo 16 detailing the awesomeness: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cKpzp358F4
I sure hope it's not microwave popcorn since microwaves create radiation! Also popcorn is made from GMOs aka Monsanto Death Kernels!
MMMMmmmmmMMMMM!!! Microwaved Monsanto Death Kernels, with Sriracha Sauce!
Damn, that actually sounds pretty tasty.