It's a private venue, open to the public. That is the difference.
All the relevant laws apply - no discrimination against the usual groups, etc. But the venue owner has always reserved certain rights, such as prohibiting flash photography or audio/video recording. This is nothing new, and nothing has changed here other than venue owners now have an apparently effective preventative measure.
He has zero chance of winning, which makes his being better or worse irrelevant. The main point of voting 3rd party in this election is to send a message to the two major parties. Symbolic, but many voters strongly dislike the major party candidates.
What I find interesting is none of the exposed information is claimed to be falsified.
Nonsense. The default position of the Clinton campaign is that none of these documents can be trusted to be authentic. That assertion hasn't survived contact with reality, however.
If you're claiming that evidence exists, then the burden of proof falls on you.
If no evidence is forthcoming, then your claim is baseless. We owe it to ourselves to demand proof before stirring the pudding. Especially after Iraq.
How soon we forget.
The problem is that a standard refrain from the propaganda pushers was that we would instantaneously - and for all eternity - see such an overwhelming influx of tax revenue that we would immediately be able to balance the budget, bring about world peace, colonize Mars, and cure all human diseases. We have clearly fallen far short of that, and will never reach it.
Because it's hyperbole that you manufactured. Sure, some people have exaggerated the benefits, but to deny that it can increase tax revenues is silly. And this doesn't even take into account the savings from enforcement efforts; flying military helicopters over old ladies' houses is expensive.
Good for you.
Many people, however, enjoy Sling, and not everyone is a cord-cutting purist. The whole idea is freedom, yet there's always that guy bitching at others for not being free the right way.
Seriously.
Slashdot Mirror
I would have done these things as well. I wouldn't have waited this long to do them, either.
Well, good to see they got the tourniquet on it so quickly; what users remain must be brimming with confidence.
It's a private venue, open to the public. That is the difference.
All the relevant laws apply - no discrimination against the usual groups, etc. But the venue owner has always reserved certain rights, such as prohibiting flash photography or audio/video recording. This is nothing new, and nothing has changed here other than venue owners now have an apparently effective preventative measure.
U.S. posturing = evidence. Gotcha.
He has zero chance of winning, which makes his being better or worse irrelevant. The main point of voting 3rd party in this election is to send a message to the two major parties. Symbolic, but many voters strongly dislike the major party candidates.
Looks like you forgot to check the Anonymous Coward box there, Olsoc.
Classy reply.
What evidence has Obama put forward to back up these claims? Keep in mind, anonymous government sources don't count!
What I find interesting is none of the exposed information is claimed to be falsified.
Nonsense. The default position of the Clinton campaign is that none of these documents can be trusted to be authentic. That assertion hasn't survived contact with reality, however.
If you're claiming that evidence exists, then the burden of proof falls on you.
If no evidence is forthcoming, then your claim is baseless. We owe it to ourselves to demand proof before stirring the pudding. Especially after Iraq.
How soon we forget.
Don't contemplate an unprecedented cyber covert action against the messenger.
Because we've yet to be shown a single shred of evidence to back up the claim. Statements by 'anonymous government sources' don't count.
The problem is that a standard refrain from the propaganda pushers was that we would instantaneously - and for all eternity - see such an overwhelming influx of tax revenue that we would immediately be able to balance the budget, bring about world peace, colonize Mars, and cure all human diseases. We have clearly fallen far short of that, and will never reach it.
Because it's hyperbole that you manufactured. Sure, some people have exaggerated the benefits, but to deny that it can increase tax revenues is silly. And this doesn't even take into account the savings from enforcement efforts; flying military helicopters over old ladies' houses is expensive.
'Radical'?
Not any more.
you send a message that their policy isn't important
I wanted to vote third-party this year, but I made the mistake of checking out the candidates' 'policy', and here I am.
Neat find, but I'm not fact-checking every AC comment. It's not a fallacy - the well is poisoned if you haven't noticed.
Sure, it's a bit of a garbage fire, but I'm enjoying the light.
Thanks for the lesson kid, but most of us here are aware of how it works. Or at least aware enough to not take political advice from an AC.
Good for you.
Many people, however, enjoy Sling, and not everyone is a cord-cutting purist. The whole idea is freedom, yet there's always that guy bitching at others for not being free the right way.
Seriously.
We've got it, thanks.
I use XFCE myself.
There's a world of difference in having "href=http://blahblahb.jpg" and "img src=http://labhaldfad.jpg".
For starters, they appear to be completely different images.
And Adobe isn't on trial here. Flash is a terrible piece of software, but it's still legal.
So, overruled.
They'll probably be programmed to not slam on the brakes, so it will be an improvement over their human counterparts.
LastPass, too, was the victim of a 'malicious hack':
LastPass breach, 2015