Slashdot Mirror
Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Phone Catches Fire on Southwest Plane (theverge.com)
After learning about faulty battery issues in its Galaxy Note 7 smartphone, Samsung said it will offer its existing customers a safe, replacement unit. It appears the replacement unit also suffers from the same issue. Jordan Golson, reporting for The Verge: Southwest Airlines flight 944 from Louisville to Baltimore was evacuated this morning while still at the gate because of a smoking Samsung Galaxy Note 7 smartphone. All passengers and crew exited the plane via the main cabin door and no injuries were reported, a Southwest Airlines spokesperson told The Verge. More worryingly, the phone in question was a replacement Galaxy Note 7, one that was deemed to be safe by Samsung. The Verge spoke to Brian Green, owner of the Note 7, on the phone earlier today and he confirmed that he had picked up the new phone at an AT&T store on September 21st. A photograph of the box shows the black square symbol that indicates a replacement Note 7 and Green said it had a green battery icon.A spokesperson for Southwest Airlines said, "prior to the Southwest Airlines Flight 994 departing from Louisville for Baltimore, a customer reported smoke emitting from an electronic device. All customers and crew deplaned safely via the main cabin door. Customers will be accommodated on other Southwest flights to their final destinations. Safety is always our top priority at Southwest and we encourage our customers to comply with the FAA Pack Safe Guidelines."
just put it out with one of the snakes.
Table-ized A.I.
Samsung marketing must be on fire after every US airline on every flight asks passengers to put away their Galaxies. You couldn't possibly increase brand awareness and establish lasting image more than that.
Somehow Apple is to blame for all of this, I can feel it in my Android phone.
Never were tested for operation at full power running multiple things in fast-changing environments where the signals keep changing rapidly.
Stresses the battery, which reacts differently due to the reduced cabin pressure at higher elevation.
Basic physics. Or at least it was during my Engineering Physics courses this year.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
on commercial aircraft!
Joke's on him, as airplane travel is one of the times I need both the headphone jack and charge port at the same time. When you have nothing better to do but play with your phone and listen to music for several hours straight, you're going to need to charge.
I vaguely recall a Samsung ad about how useful replaceable batteries are in that scenario as well, but they seem to have forgotten about that...
Your devices must be off at all times in flight and in the provided fire proof box
What?
One smoking phone battery and:
* The plane is evacuated.
* The flight is cancelled.
What?
How would it not be enough to fling the phone out the door and carry on?
do people have cameras ready, and immediately photograph something that caught fire, and the box it came in which was curiously brought along on the flight, for immediate publishing on the Internet? It seems as if the whole idea was to create even more bad press for the biggest foreign competitor in the U.S. phone market.
Any chance that these failures were caused by nefarious activity on a nearby roof? Lets get Elon Musk and his crack team of Twitter followers on the case.
Won't be long until devices are not allowed on planes due to being a fire hazzard....
Let’s be real for a second though There are certainly flights that are longer than the 8-10 hours you can get from a pair of BT headphones, but not *that* many people fly that far regularly nor are able to listen to music for the entire flight. I’d imagine sleep is a common alternative to music listening.
If you manage to kill your BT headphones, unplug the phone & switch to wired for a while. You’ll get another 20+ hours of music, especially with the cell radio turned off. Charge your headphones while you’re doing that.
Is it slightly less convenient than being able to listen to wired headphones & charge? Sure. Do many people find themselves in that position frequently? I doubt it.
While we're at it can someone please pin a bunch of phone fires on the lack of a microSD slot and 3.5mm jack? Please?
This should be seized as an opportunity to lobby for mandatory removeable/replaceable batteries. "Think of the children!"
Really though it would just be great to force these companies to make maintainable, repairable, expandable devices.
I keep my headphones on while I sleep, and expect them to not only last the night but still be fresh in the morning.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Samsung won't be able to confiscate and hide the phone now. It will go straight to the NTSB.
So you're telling people they should carry two pairs of headphones around? That's annoying.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
The phone was putting out a goodly amount of smoke, the smell of which would have to be professionally cleaned from the whole plane or most of the people in the SEALED CABIN would have gotten really sick from it.
Not to mention the carpet AND subfloor were charred, further contributing to residual smell and smoke.
Also how exactly would *you* have chucked it out the "door" - the emergency door which means the plane is not flying anywhere anyway? What door exactly????
What no-one ever told you is the magic smoke is also toxic...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
If someone in a trench coat inside an alley offers to sell you a Samsung Toilet for an amazing price, run away. You do not want to own an exploding toilet.
Owner: New phone who d-OH GOD IT'S ON FIRE!
Friend: Frank? I told you not to sleep with that floozy but nooOOOooo. Well now you got the herp.
Owner: IT'S MELTING MY FLESH!
Friend: Welcome to the club, buddy.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
My bluetooth headphones have a battery life of 30+ hours.
I've never put them to the limit though, because bluetooth audio is shit, and they can be optionally wired.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
non-smoking now?
NSA contractor read, "We need a Samsung explode". NSA still waiting for it's exploit.
Let's see, to delouse is to remove lice from hair. To decapitate is to remove the head (latin: capit). To defoliate is to remove leaves (latin: follium). But to "deplane" is to get off of a plane. Did we derun of sayoids in the English speakism? Or are the previous sayoids de-languaged by some thinly-neurated jargon multiman?
I had a flash back of Indiana Jones throwing a poor Nazi out of a blimp... saying "No ticket!"
Just replace with "He had a Note 7"
It has the worst record of (im)proper aircraft maintenance since Jet Blue or ValuJet so I would expect this to happen. Expect more. Many more. These things will blow you . . . out of the sky!
Buy Apple. Fly United. And Be safe!
I'm not really interested in Samsung phones - I've always thought them thoroughly lacking in some important areas (design, UI) - but I have to say this whole batteries-on-fire thing is some spectacular PR disaster for the only true competitor to Apples iPhone line.
Kinda makes me feel sorry for this company. AFAIHH the entire nation of South Korea is suffering with them.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
True - since he was an Android user, he could have replaced it w/ a OnePlus or Sony or LG. Only thing about the flight - a lot of planes have no USB slots nor power outlets to charge your phone, so you try to conserve as much power as you can while using it during the flight. Also, not all flights have on-board entertainment that will allow you to turn your phone off and save your battery for when you are done w/ it and bored.
All commercial aircraft should have a strengthened, heat-sinked, airtight metal pouch that can be used to snuff out burning mobile devices when lithium batteries go rogue.
that airplanes avoid. seems they don't want the seams and rivets to corrode, for some silly reason.
you can pull a car over and get out if it starts falling apart. not so an airliner. no curb.
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
People carry too much crap on flights. Laptops, Phones, Tablets, etc.
People need to declutter.
You don't need your phone everywhere you go, just rent a phone at your destination for a small fee.
You don't need you laptop everywhere you go, just rent one at your destination for a small fee.
Every phone already has cloud storage, I don't see why people can't simply arrive at their destination, pop in their SIM card, and have all their files downloaded to a secure rental phone.
People already essentially rent their phones, this just carries the concept further.
Same with PC's. They are commodity devices. Just rent one at your destination for a small fee.
Battery supplier claims the problem is an outside heat source, not the battery. Samsung has not made public any testing. To "fix" the issue Samsung blamed the battery and released a software fix to reduce the heat. My guess is it is a design flaw where they eliminated heat shielding to save weight and cost. A board redesign would be a substantial cost. Unfortunately, I have no proof. Battery supplier is Amperex Technology Limited (ATL) Headquartered in Hong Kong, Manufactured in China. Samsung phone manufacturing is in Korea.
Joke's on him, as airplane travel is one of the times I need both the headphone jack and charge port at the same time. When you have nothing better to do but play with your phone and listen to music for several hours straight, you're going to need to charge.
I vaguely recall a Samsung ad about how useful replaceable batteries are in that scenario as well, but they seem to have forgotten about that...
Joke's on you mindless AC. Do some research first, next time.
Here's One of the MANY options for wireless charging while headphoning with standard headphones for Lightning-equipped devices. Here's another one for $11 (I'm sure it's not MFi-certified like the Belkin is; but hey...).
Oh, and that search took 1 second on Google, and 2 seconds and one scroll-wheel-flick on Amazon.
Hatetard.
If you manage to kill your BT headphones, unplug the phone & switch to wired for a while. You’ll get another 20+ hours of music, especially with the cell radio turned off. Charge your headphones while you’re doing that.
In fact, according to the specs, the iPhone 7 lasts 40 hours just listening to music (I assume "local" music and with wired headphones), and the 7 plus lasts 60 hours (!!!)
So, unless you are on a moon-shuttle, you're probably covered.
Samsung should just go into military contracts... imagine if all their washers/dryers/phones/TVs/etc exploded at the same time. You could win a war easily...
We call it "Campfire!"
and they will need to reinstall seat back tv's. On UA they have wifi with lot's of free movies and tv shows
you can't open the door in flight the presser is to high
some airports have the auto seat cover rolls. Like ORD
We all know there's workarounds, but they're clunky. It's annoying that my iPhone 7 is more cumbersome to do the things just worked out of the box with my iPhone 6, yes I know I can get bluetooth headphones, which I did but on a long haul flight they don't last and don't work in airplane mode anyway. So now I need another set of headphones and a headphone+charge adapter.
That's not the sort of regression in user experience I'm used to with Apple's products. The other issue with it is the inconsistency, the lightning port isn't available on any Mac so the lightning-only headphones they ship with the iPhone (without any lightning to 3.5mm adapter) don't even work with my other Apple products.
Now I'm sure you'll leap to their defence with all the possible workarounds but the fact is the user experience is now worse, this is a downgrade, not an upgrade and usually Apple handles these things so well so this is disappointing but it's ok it's an annoyance and you can admit that.
... when Steve Jobs was CEO.
Oh coming from you this is good. Have you asked Apple if they consider this a good idea? Does it void the warranty? Here I thought you were against cheap stuff, but was I wrong! You apparently recommend meetcute as a manufacturer of parts for the iPhone. Are all their products Apple certified? Because guess what. I'd bet a paycheck that if someone came on this forum and said I just bought a splitter from meetcute and my iPhone 7 burned up, you'd be the first to chastise them for using junk that wasn't Apple certified.
Finally, quit with the 'hater' shit. After seeing your portrayal of Android users and Android phones, there's no room on the high road for you.
You can now play GTA V using the Samsung Note 7 as an improvised hand grenade.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Jobs umbrage at Eric Schmidt for Google adapting iOS ideas in Android
What ? Because Apple actually managed to bring something new which wasn't in countless predecessors in the PDA space ?
I'm genuinely curious. I remember the big noise Apple made around the iPhone, but all I could personally think was "well, somebody has bolted a phone/modem to my Palm. Big deal".
The only details I found of note is that the iPhone went for a capacitive touch screen - similar to laptop's touchpad, enabling multi-touch, but making impossible to make precise strokes [thus no graffiti/handwriting, no sketching, etc.] - whereas any of the other keyboard-less PDA of the time where all resistive touch screens - only one finger at a time to push the button, but if you use a stylus, you can draw extremely precise sketches, or use handwriting-/drawn symbols- based input.
I couldn't in fact any other thing that the iPhone provided that wasn't provided already on PDA.
Was rather the opposite: back then the iPhone wasn't very open to hacker/devs/community (at the beginning, it was "webapps" only).
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Fact is, more than 6,000 kids died in the eight years before lawn darts were banned. Now, is it worth banning just to save 763 lives a year?
Out of which population, what are the other causes of death and at which rate ?
In a big enough sample you could even find significant deaths caused by "improper use of handkerchief".
So put those death in relation with the rest.
If you reach the conclusion that "at 20% of all kids' death, this is the third most dangerous activity in this age group" (similar to deaths by car crashes or cardiovascular disease in adults) - yes, introducing a ban, or at least imposing new security regulations would be a nice idea leading to improvement.
If you reach the conclustion that "this only represent 0.1% of all deaths, and is number 143 in the list of all death causes" (similar to deaths by lightning strike or terrorism in developed western countries), you're just wasting resources (though it sucks for those 0.1% kids, there are definitely more urgent matters)
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is Apple sabotage.
Waiting for the next fire after the next replacement.
I "admit" that progress often comes with some minor adjustments, and this is no exception.-
But I was actually surprised to already see almost 2 dozen Lightning headphones and earbuds on Amazon, with quality and prices from $799 (!!!) all the way down to $30 or maybe less, and about a half-dozen dual-port charging/listening cables, too. So the "annoyance" won't be lasting long.
Same thing when Apple "removed" the serial ports and floppy drive on the original iMac in 1998. People with serial printers went wild. People that used floppies went wild. But within a year, it was getting hard to find a new printer that wasn't USB. And floppies disappeared from common use soon thereafter.
And so it will be with analog headphones.
Oh coming from you this is good. Have you asked Apple if they consider this a good idea? Does it void the warranty? Here I thought you were against cheap stuff, but was I wrong! You apparently recommend meetcute as a manufacturer of parts for the iPhone. Are all their products Apple certified? Because guess what. I'd bet a paycheck that if someone came on this forum and said I just bought a splitter from meetcute and my iPhone 7 burned up, you'd be the first to chastise them for using junk that wasn't Apple certified.
Finally, quit with the 'hater' shit. After seeing your portrayal of Android users and Android phones, there's no room on the high road for you.
I pointed out that the cheaper adapter was likely not MFi. I didn't endorse nor warn either way. We're all ostensibly tech-savvy adults here. But I also believe in the power of user reviews. If a device screws up someone's iPhone, I am SURE he/she will be RIGHT THERE to report it!
And considering the insanely personal, over-the-top crap directed to me, usually by Karma-proof ACs, I feel quite justified in dishing a little bit back from time to time. Tough shit.
Here's one that just came in, right after your comment? And all I did was suggest that someone should go to work for Samsung's PR department (I swear!).
Now tell me honestly, how would that make YOU feel?
But I was actually surprised to already see almost 2 dozen Lightning headphones and earbuds on Amazon, with quality and prices from $799 (!!!) all the way down to $30 or maybe less, and about a half-dozen dual-port charging/listening cables, too. So the "annoyance" won't be lasting long.
Yeah except they don't work with anything else, they don't even work with any of my Macs (or any iDevices) and I still need an adapter for the plane when I want to have it on charge and listen to music. With the serial ports and floppy drive it was: "hey we're replacing this with a superior standard", that is not the case here.
But I was actually surprised to already see almost 2 dozen Lightning headphones and earbuds on Amazon, with quality and prices from $799 (!!!) all the way down to $30 or maybe less, and about a half-dozen dual-port charging/listening cables, too. So the "annoyance" won't be lasting long.
Yeah except they don't work with anything else, they don't even work with any of my Macs (or any iDevices) and I still need an adapter for the plane when I want to have it on charge and listen to music. With the serial ports and floppy drive it was: "hey we're replacing this with a superior standard", that is not the case here.
And their contention is that they are replacing the 3.5 mm analog Jack with a superior standard. Reread my post, and think about your response.
And as far as the floppy goes, they really didn't replace it with anything better, because I'm not sure you could even get a CD *BURNER* in the original iMac, and USB sticks really didn't exist yet.
And their contention is that they are replacing the 3.5 mm analog Jack with a superior standard. Reread my post, and think about your response.
I read what you wrote, lightning is not a standard, in fact not only that it isn't even available across Apple's own product lines. Also it wasn't replaced with anything, I had a single lighting connector and bluetooth headphone capability on my iPhone 6 too, if they replaced the headphone jack with another lightning connector then fine - still not a standard but at least it solves one of the annoyances.
Well, for starters, just how much does it cost to ground an airliner, find alternate airliner, repair and fix airliner?
How much will it cost in sales?
Though, it's cheap compared to the lives that might have been lost.
Should people bring lithium batteries on a plane at all?
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
And their contention is that they are replacing the 3.5 mm analog Jack with a superior standard. Reread my post, and think about your response.
I read what you wrote, lightning is not a standard, in fact not only that it isn't even available across Apple's own product lines. Also it wasn't replaced with anything, I had a single lighting connector and bluetooth headphone capability on my iPhone 6 too, if they replaced the headphone jack with another lightning connector then fine - still not a standard but at least it solves one of the annoyances.
Lightning IS a standard, in the same way that Thunderbolt is a standard, or sacd is a standard, or DVD is a standard, or Zigbee is a standard, or LONTalk is a standard, or Bluetooth is a standard, or Ethernet is a standard, or UPC codes are a standard. Just because Apple developed and is the sole Licensor of that Standard doesn't make it any less of a "Standard" than those other examples.
Can you manufacture a device that claims to read DVDs without a License? No.
Can you manufacture something that needs a Bluetooth ID without a License? no.
Can you manufacture a device that has a SACD logo without a License? No.
Can you manufacture a device that mentions being Zigbee-compatible without a License? No.
Can you manufacture a device that has a MAC address without a License? No.
Can you manufacture ANYTNING that needs a UPC code without a License? No.
Yet no one in their right mind would dream of calling those "Not a Standard". So, since Apple will allow ANYONE who meets their criteria and pays their License Fee to design and sell Lightning-compatible products, claim MFi-Compliance, and be "guaranteed to work" with other Lightning-equipped products, how is that NOT a Standard? Just because some Apple products have Lightning ports and others don't (which will likely be solved this model refresh)? Because Apple requires Licensing? Or is it Because Apple?
You see, it is PRECISELY the MFi certification Program that MAKES Lightning a Standard. Now, if Apple said "No one but Apple shall make Lightning-compatible Products, and we shall sue anyone who tries", THAT would be a NON-Standard. But AFAICT, "sue-happy" Apple hasn't even been going after ANY of the dozens, if not hundreds, of products being openly sold on Amazon that are also openly stated as NOT MFi-Certified, and, as you can see in the Listings and Reviews for those products, Apple doesn't even bother to raise a Compliance-Error Alert when those devices are plugged in. So obviously, "money-grabbing" Apple is MUCH more interested in proliferating Lightning as a Standard than they are in wringing every single penny out of License fees, much less using it as a tool for "vendor lock-in".
So why doesn't Apple just Open Source Lightning? I do not know; but considering how many other things that Apple has Open Soirced, I wouldn't be surprised if they soon do exactly that. But the same thing could be said of the abovementioned examples of "Standards" that are still "Licensed"; some after decades of widespread use.
Opening, maybe (if the safety is defeated). Closing it again without getting thrown out may be more difficult.
I was on a domestic flight on Japan Airlines yesterday and they specifically called out the Note 7 before takeoff.
I have a set of bluetooth Sennheiser headphones. The battery life is over 20 hours. The noise cancelation on them is nice too. I got them specifically to do as you do.
Wifi and bluetooth can be turned on while in airplane mode. This is also useful while roaming. Also you can get bluetooth headphones that last for 20+ hours now.
Sennheiser doesn't seem to make bluetooth earbuds? I can't sleep in full headphones.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Don't think so. I have over-ear ones.
the old "but something else is worse" fallacy.
It's not a question of "worse". It's all about deaths. You can't be "worse dead than dead". The issue is the same: you're dead.
It's a question about numbers and "should I give a fuck about them".
There's a difference between something that has claimed less than 10 deaths since the dawn of humanity, and something that is likely to claim the life of nearly 50% of all people you've met in your life.
For the people themselves, it's all the same : they're dead anyway. No one is worse than anyone else, they are all in the same situation, as bas as it can gets.
It's for organising something.
If you're going to introduce drastic measures that will require people to completely change their habits and lifestyle, and will prevent them from doing some activities for ever, it'd better be worth.
It's a "cost" vs. "benefit" analysis.
If the cost is high (making some everyday task unbearably annoying, banning for ever some activities, etc..) the benefit ought to be a bit more significant than "prevents 1 death out of trillion" (e.g: chance of dying following a direct meteor impact)
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Yet no one in their right mind would dream of calling those "Not a Standard". So, since Apple will allow ANYONE who meets their criteria and pays their License Fee to design and sell Lightning-compatible products, claim MFi-Compliance, and be "guaranteed to work" with other Lightning-equipped products, how is that NOT a Standard?
Because nobody else can use it in their devices, you can only use it to make accessories for Apple products.
So why doesn't Apple just Open Source Lightning?
Because they can extract license fees from it and this would allow for companies to make accessories that easily work for both iDevices and non-iDevices. It's in their interest as a for-profit company to do exactly this.
But the same thing could be said of the abovementioned examples of "Standards" that are still "Licensed"; some after decades of widespread use.
No, it couldn't. Because anybody can make a DVD and a DVD drive and all they need to do is pay the license fees, you cannot do the same with lightning. HTC can't just come along and make a phone with a lightning port.
But this is all beside the point, the point is what they did is made their newer device more of a pain in the ass to use than their previous one without adding any replacement technology, this is a step backward for Apple in general and I'm not sure what makes you so desperately defend that.
Wifi and bluetooth can be turned on while in airplane mode.
The whole point of Airplane mode is to stop wireless connections. Of course you can selectively turn those features back on but whether it's Windows, Android or iOS when you turn on airplane mode it turns off wifi and bluetooth.
Also you can get bluetooth headphones that last for 20+ hours now.
Which ones?
Yet no one in their right mind would dream of calling those "Not a Standard". So, since Apple will allow ANYONE who meets their criteria and pays their License Fee to design and sell Lightning-compatible products, claim MFi-Compliance, and be "guaranteed to work" with other Lightning-equipped products, how is that NOT a Standard?
Because nobody else can use it in their devices, you can only use it to make accessories for Apple products.
Prove it.
So why doesn't Apple just Open Source Lightning?
Because they can extract license fees from it and this would allow for companies to make accessories that easily work for both iDevices and non-iDevices. It's in their interest as a for-profit company to do exactly this.
Nice selective editing. You disingenuously left off the part where I noted that Apple doesn't seem to be interested in going after manufacturers nor vendors of "bootleg" non-MFi Lightning products.
But the same thing could be said of the abovementioned examples of "Standards" that are still "Licensed"; some after decades of widespread use.
No, it couldn't. Because anybody can make a DVD and a DVD drive and all they need to do is pay the license fees, you cannot do the same with lightning. HTC can't just come along and make a phone with a lightning port.
Prove it.
Apple licensed FireWire, too, yet there were FireWire ports on everything from competitors' computers to cameras to audio interfaces to mixing consoles to who-knows-what. And your assertion flies in the face of your reasoning that Apple wants to enrich themselves with Licensing fees. If that were the case, why WOULDN'T they want to extract a License for a Lightning interface on anything and everything, and ESPECIALLY on competitors' products like phones and laptops?!?
I don't think airlines care about wifi and bluetooth, I mean I've never heard them ask people to make sure they keep their wifi off when everyone has a laptop.
https://en-us.sennheiser.com/m...
https://en-us.sennheiser.com/w...
The second ones say up to 30 hours of battery. The first are 22 I think.
There's a difference of design and purpose of these object.
Lawn darts are basically like scissors.
Lawn darts have a pointy bit, that might get dangerous when use unsupervised.
But they have a use: they are toys, designed for play. Most of people will use it to play, most people will be successful at playing without getting hurt.
(Just like scissors have a sharp edge that could get people hurt. But scissors are extremely useful tools, so they won't get banned)
A kid with a bazooka doesn't serve any purpose. A bazooka is a weapon designed to bring destruction and/or death.
Though some extremely creative (or deranged kid) might be succesful at designing a fun game around one, that's not their typical use.
(Same also why some people, specially people living in the safer parts of the world like me, don't really see the point of needing to own guns).
That's why you're likely to find very few people complaining about the ban on giving their kids bazookas, whereas you'll constantly see people complaining when some random toy they've used to play with when they were kids is suddenly considered too much dangerous and gets banned (like Kinder Suprise chocolate eggs).
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]