I hope they can keep more and more of this intellectual wealth in Asia, instead of having it usurped by the U.S. Asian governments and large corporations need to treat highly educated people to better job offerings.
That video mock-up with the epic battle music makes the company out as being run by a bunch of excited teenage boys, or something. Pretentious and lacking of seriousness.
Do you mean innovations that are built upon previous innovations and technology, the aggregate of which involves every nation? You might as well say the whole world, the self-entitled and trigger-happy U.S in particular, stole from China because they invented gun powder and the first explosives. There's nothing being made today that is not enabled by centuries of research and innovation by people from all over the world, China included.
Are you that guy who sneers at people when they say they didn't like a book they read, or a movie they watched, or a dish they tasted, because they're not acclaimed writers, directors or master chefs? Can people not judge and criticize things unless they've achieved better and greater themselves? You're just tripping over your own head with replies like that.
You must be dumb and unable to see farther than the front of your computer screen, if you can't put in context U.S foreign operations and expansion since the 1900's, see the big picture and connect the dots. Either that or you're just some dumb shill. Try educating yourself instead of letting corporate media school you.
Exactly! While I am convinced GMO crops, in particular those by this large, greedy American corporation, are hazardous, the fact that Monsanto is becoming an extension of the U.S government, is a greater threat. The aim is not to feed people, but to use production and supply of food as a political weapon. The world must reject Monsanto, and ideally all American mega-corporations where possible, or you will see them take over more and more control over trade and politics over your countries.
How utterly useless. It looks like a man in full-body casting who's trying to walk discretely after soiling himself. Given the recent findings on the Pentagon's un-checked spendings, this black hole for funding is well on form for the U.S government.
I doubt this product can cover all the micronutrients your body needs. Fats, fibers, proteins and some vitamins aren't enough. Live entirely off of this stuff, and you're in for dementia at an early age.
It's impressive because it all sits in one and the same chip, is technically innovative with its new HSA, and is dead cheap. The AMD A-series cover 4/5 desktop users needs at bargain prices. This sort of integration has a huge market potential, and AMD is leading the development.
I've gone from having an easy to manage YouTube account, to now having a Google account, with no Google+ page and no YouTube account, but which is linked to my old YouTube account, which now has a new Google+ page, but no Google account. I'm not sure how to manage these pages and accounts, and I'm not even allowed to comment on my own videos on YouTube anymore.
I hope this will eventually result in an absolute mind-fuck of introspection for the Google design team.
I think it is about time people everywhere be allowed to sit for exams without having to attend to compulsory schooling beforehand. Teachers and lecturers everywhere need to be less pretentious in assuming their students wouldn't be able to gain knowledge on their own and without their divine intervention.
That's a great idea. Another problem I experienced in school was that many teachers misinterpret their role and concern themselves with how they should use criteria to filter away students, instead of how they can help the students achieve and pass for higher education and a career.
This exact system is already in use in remote desktop software, so you can't really argue it's stupid and that the people writing these softwares are also stupid, and so your replies clearly show you don't understand how modern computer screens, display devices and operating systems work, nor the concept of a shared memory system and why memory contention is a real issue.
It all boils down to these options:
1. Keep the current system where the display device continuously burdens video RAM or system RAM with f.ex 500 Mbyte/s when there is no screen change.
2. Optimize by using G-Sync, only burdening RAM when there's an actual change on the screen.
3. Optimize yet further and reduce the burden on RAM by only sending actual updates, instead of the whole screen.
You shouldn't be asking "Can Huawei actually gain more customers by playing off the Snowden scandal?", but rather if American vendors can keep their customers in light of the NSA scandal.
That's not how it would be implemented. You would just let the operating system tell the driver what parts of the screen need to be updated, since it directs all drawing operations and knows exactly what has changed on the screen. The power savings and performance benefits come from not having to burden the video RAM by continuously reading x*100 Mbyte/s of screen memory to generate the display signal when there's little or nothing happening on the screen. It would reduce power consumption and increase performance in any system, whether it has a discrete graphics board, an APUs, or any other integrated graphics.
You wouldn't do a naive pixel-by-pixel compare, the operating system would tell the driver what to update since it directs all screen changes and always knows what has changed.
It's not about the bandwidth between the screen and the display device, but the memory bandwidth consumed from the video RAM, since the display device currently reads the screen memory 60 times per second even if there's nothing currently happening. By only sending the parts that have changed, you free up memory bandwidth for any other device sharing that memory. It would speed up 3D rendering on discrete devices since it leaves more memory bandwidth for rendering, and it would do wonders for portable devices with APUs, where both the CPU and GPU share the same memory.
My point was not concerning what type of connection you have to the screen, but that you can save memory bandwidth and power by only sending to the screen what needs to be updated.
In [i]that[/i] particular case we're back to square one, where we are now, but in all other cases there are power- and memory bandwidth savings. Not all usage cases are full screen FPS games, and typically these are not the users who are concerned with memory bandwidth and power usage.
Stop starving your body by living on quick rushes of carb, and get off your ass.
... that this man promises change, but changes his promises. He'll say what people want to hear.
I hope they can keep more and more of this intellectual wealth in Asia, instead of having it usurped by the U.S. Asian governments and large corporations need to treat highly educated people to better job offerings.
That video mock-up with the epic battle music makes the company out as being run by a bunch of excited teenage boys, or something. Pretentious and lacking of seriousness.
Do you mean innovations that are built upon previous innovations and technology, the aggregate of which involves every nation? You might as well say the whole world, the self-entitled and trigger-happy U.S in particular, stole from China because they invented gun powder and the first explosives. There's nothing being made today that is not enabled by centuries of research and innovation by people from all over the world, China included.
Are you that guy who sneers at people when they say they didn't like a book they read, or a movie they watched, or a dish they tasted, because they're not acclaimed writers, directors or master chefs? Can people not judge and criticize things unless they've achieved better and greater themselves? You're just tripping over your own head with replies like that.
There is no shortage of food, the problems are uneven distribution and enormous waste.
You must be dumb and unable to see farther than the front of your computer screen, if you can't put in context U.S foreign operations and expansion since the 1900's, see the big picture and connect the dots. Either that or you're just some dumb shill. Try educating yourself instead of letting corporate media school you.
Exactly! While I am convinced GMO crops, in particular those by this large, greedy American corporation, are hazardous, the fact that Monsanto is becoming an extension of the U.S government, is a greater threat. The aim is not to feed people, but to use production and supply of food as a political weapon. The world must reject Monsanto, and ideally all American mega-corporations where possible, or you will see them take over more and more control over trade and politics over your countries.
As an interesting observation, the Bitcoin network has peaked at over 60 exaFLOPS of computational power.
How utterly useless. It looks like a man in full-body casting who's trying to walk discretely after soiling himself. Given the recent findings on the Pentagon's un-checked spendings, this black hole for funding is well on form for the U.S government.
I find this to be the best and most appropriate use of U.S weaponized drones; to have them turn back and crash into the operators.
I doubt this product can cover all the micronutrients your body needs. Fats, fibers, proteins and some vitamins aren't enough. Live entirely off of this stuff, and you're in for dementia at an early age.
It's impressive because it all sits in one and the same chip, is technically innovative with its new HSA, and is dead cheap. The AMD A-series cover 4/5 desktop users needs at bargain prices. This sort of integration has a huge market potential, and AMD is leading the development.
I've gone from having an easy to manage YouTube account, to now having a Google account, with no Google+ page and no YouTube account, but which is linked to my old YouTube account, which now has a new Google+ page, but no Google account. I'm not sure how to manage these pages and accounts, and I'm not even allowed to comment on my own videos on YouTube anymore. I hope this will eventually result in an absolute mind-fuck of introspection for the Google design team.
Gov now has the reasons they need to impose even tighter security and restrictions on movement and personal freedom. How convenient!
I would only trust foreign services with no physical ties to the U.S, whether Google say they support them or not.
I think it is about time people everywhere be allowed to sit for exams without having to attend to compulsory schooling beforehand. Teachers and lecturers everywhere need to be less pretentious in assuming their students wouldn't be able to gain knowledge on their own and without their divine intervention.
That's a great idea. Another problem I experienced in school was that many teachers misinterpret their role and concern themselves with how they should use criteria to filter away students, instead of how they can help the students achieve and pass for higher education and a career.
I prefer education over schooling.
This exact system is already in use in remote desktop software, so you can't really argue it's stupid and that the people writing these softwares are also stupid, and so your replies clearly show you don't understand how modern computer screens, display devices and operating systems work, nor the concept of a shared memory system and why memory contention is a real issue.
It all boils down to these options:
1. Keep the current system where the display device continuously burdens video RAM or system RAM with f.ex 500 Mbyte/s when there is no screen change.
2. Optimize by using G-Sync, only burdening RAM when there's an actual change on the screen.
3. Optimize yet further and reduce the burden on RAM by only sending actual updates, instead of the whole screen.
You shouldn't be asking "Can Huawei actually gain more customers by playing off the Snowden scandal?", but rather if American vendors can keep their customers in light of the NSA scandal.
That's not how it would be implemented. You would just let the operating system tell the driver what parts of the screen need to be updated, since it directs all drawing operations and knows exactly what has changed on the screen. The power savings and performance benefits come from not having to burden the video RAM by continuously reading x*100 Mbyte/s of screen memory to generate the display signal when there's little or nothing happening on the screen. It would reduce power consumption and increase performance in any system, whether it has a discrete graphics board, an APUs, or any other integrated graphics.
You wouldn't do a naive pixel-by-pixel compare, the operating system would tell the driver what to update since it directs all screen changes and always knows what has changed. It's not about the bandwidth between the screen and the display device, but the memory bandwidth consumed from the video RAM, since the display device currently reads the screen memory 60 times per second even if there's nothing currently happening. By only sending the parts that have changed, you free up memory bandwidth for any other device sharing that memory. It would speed up 3D rendering on discrete devices since it leaves more memory bandwidth for rendering, and it would do wonders for portable devices with APUs, where both the CPU and GPU share the same memory.
My point was not concerning what type of connection you have to the screen, but that you can save memory bandwidth and power by only sending to the screen what needs to be updated.
In [i]that[/i] particular case we're back to square one, where we are now, but in all other cases there are power- and memory bandwidth savings. Not all usage cases are full screen FPS games, and typically these are not the users who are concerned with memory bandwidth and power usage.