That's not always the case, say you're a farmer. You purchased a cheap piece of land.
The land gets revaluation, but you are a farmer, you are not in the real state business, why should you pay rising property-taxes for the value the market assigns to my property?
The same logic applies to stock.
I can think of a reason: There is no international money transfer method that is simultaneously affordable, fast and secure:
Paypal Is affordable and fast, but is not secure. They can freeze your founds for whatever reason they want to.
Swift transactions and wire transfer services like western union are expensive and bothersome.
CC are expensive and insecure, and not accessible to everybody qualifies for them
Maybe there are other alternatives I don't know of, but cryptocurrencies as a means of exchange, if successful, should introduce competition and lower the CC tax.
Android apps are surprisingly good on ChromeOS now.
Dude, do you own a Chromebook?
I have a samsung chromebook 3 and IMHO APK's on chromebook suck, at least on the graphic support, and that's the only thing you'd care about running an android application. It feels like running an android VM.
The transaction fee, at least on bitcoins, is intrinsic to the system. If you want a say on it, you need 50% of the mining pool. Not that a government couldn't possibly reach that mining power, but at that point they would be, effectively, endorsing the currencies.
An ARM chromebook is viable. The same niche could be competed by Microsoft.
The issue is the public expectations. The same people that blame linux for not running their <token program>, will blame windows for the same thing.
Somehow, people don't expect their mobile phones be able to do the same as their PCs. The apple phenomenon is seems to suggest that people really don't need their <token programgt;.
ARM is a more efficient architecture on for applications.
Even if you consider single core applications peak computing power, the benchmarks show that AMD64 isn't more than 20% faster than ARM64.
The real issue are, as always, preexisting closed software ecosystems. An ARM linux box is perfectly viable.
Better liked than the alternatives (tizen, sailfish, windows, symbian and qnx).
Pre-existing ecosystem is not a valid argument, all those flavors were concurrent to android, and the ecosystem argument is used for favouring windows over GNU/Linux
Why the need for punishment?
As long as the CC companies take the burden of fraud losses, they can keep the shitty system if it makes financial sense for them.
On the other hand, Cocaine can be used for experimentation as a scheduled 2 drug.
The reason marijuana is not type 2 is that the FDA doesn't admit valid use case for marijuana for wich is not already covered by another superior drug. Or maybe it's bigotry and war on drugs.
Copyright infringement is not theft.
There are valid reasons for Intelectual Property Laws in capitalist societies, but the current terms are neither fair, nor up to the information age.
Just not true. Linux support was stalled for years until Microsoft bought them and released an updated version. It receives frequent updates since then.
You can filter the viable matches by ages, so the price has no impact on "fewer" desirable candidates for women.
The differences is that paid users have unlimited requests, and the less appealing men need those request to make a match, because of the 80/20 rule
https://medium.com/@worstonlin...
Until I purchased a Sony DPT-RP1.
It comes with a stylus that imitates "real writing experience", including replaceable tips that wear down like pencils, and brake when falling like fountain pens.
Slashdot Mirror
We have a lot of respect for Facebook and the value they've placed on messaging capabilities, some of which were invented by BlackBerry.
Which capabilities? Using a mobile's phone number as user ID? I agree it was innovative, but I don't think you can patent it.
That's not always the case, say you're a farmer. You purchased a cheap piece of land.
The land gets revaluation, but you are a farmer, you are not in the real state business, why should you pay rising property-taxes for the value the market assigns to my property?
The same logic applies to stock.
The "Art" in question is usually worthless.
I can think of a reason: There is no international money transfer method that is simultaneously affordable, fast and secure:
Paypal Is affordable and fast, but is not secure. They can freeze your founds for whatever reason they want to.
Swift transactions and wire transfer services like western union are expensive and bothersome.
CC are expensive and insecure, and not accessible to everybody qualifies for them
Maybe there are other alternatives I don't know of, but cryptocurrencies as a means of exchange, if successful, should introduce competition and lower the CC tax.
Android apps are surprisingly good on ChromeOS now.
Dude, do you own a Chromebook?
I have a samsung chromebook 3 and IMHO APK's on chromebook suck, at least on the graphic support, and that's the only thing you'd care about running an android application. It feels like running an android VM.
The transaction fee, at least on bitcoins, is intrinsic to the system. If you want a say on it, you need 50% of the mining pool. Not that a government couldn't possibly reach that mining power, but at that point they would be, effectively, endorsing the currencies.
An ARM chromebook is viable. The same niche could be competed by Microsoft.
The issue is the public expectations. The same people that blame linux for not running their <token program>, will blame windows for the same thing.
Somehow, people don't expect their mobile phones be able to do the same as their PCs. The apple phenomenon is seems to suggest that people really don't need their <token programgt;.
ARM is a more efficient architecture on for applications.
Even if you consider single core applications peak computing power, the benchmarks show that AMD64 isn't more than 20% faster than ARM64.
The real issue are, as always, preexisting closed software ecosystems. An ARM linux box is perfectly viable.
2 years of prison for a civil case of copyright infringement. Awesome!
Better liked than the alternatives (tizen, sailfish, windows, symbian and qnx).
Pre-existing ecosystem is not a valid argument, all those flavors were concurrent to android, and the ecosystem argument is used for favouring windows over GNU/Linux
Wikipedia has a history, so you're able to cite an specific version of an article. Traceability is not the issue, authority is.
Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. By definition it musn't have original content.
And 11000 was, probably, the number of accounts. Ie, not every ebay user has done at least one transaction,
Those 11000 were "clients" purchasing the CC numbers, not the one suppliers.
Why the need for punishment?
As long as the CC companies take the burden of fraud losses, they can keep the shitty system if it makes financial sense for them.
On the other hand, Cocaine can be used for experimentation as a scheduled 2 drug.
The reason marijuana is not type 2 is that the FDA doesn't admit valid use case for marijuana for wich is not already covered by another superior drug. Or maybe it's bigotry and war on drugs.
Copyright infringement is not theft.
There are valid reasons for Intelectual Property Laws in capitalist societies, but the current terms are neither fair, nor up to the information age.
Just not true. Linux support was stalled for years until Microsoft bought them and released an updated version. It receives frequent updates since then.
What can be inappropriate about a messenger app?
Good looking people don't need the extra services, and with the free subscription they have more matches than they can handle.
You can filter the viable matches by ages, so the price has no impact on "fewer" desirable candidates for women.
The differences is that paid users have unlimited requests, and the less appealing men need those request to make a match, because of the 80/20 rule https://medium.com/@worstonlin...
copyright-encumbered DOCX format
What do you mean by that? wasn't that issue solved?
Until I purchased a Sony DPT-RP1.
It comes with a stylus that imitates "real writing experience", including replaceable tips that wear down like pencils, and brake when falling like fountain pens.
So, to make a google competitor, he should all put up with sub par search engines for the sake of what?
WhatsApp is facebook's. Your point still stands.