That's the problem with these Chinese social networking soldiers. They try to use hypocrisy to say that things are either okay or not China's fault. You're right. America can be a hypocrite and still say true statements
You make me want to download lantern. Back in the day the United States was actively promoting democracy. France, our biggest ally in the revolution received a colds shoulder from us as we favored the rebellion. Screw China and screw totalitarianism.
The United States Court System is already designed to deal with this. Without, sadly, multiple regulatory bodies. Let's say the Highway Patrol Service determines the cause of the death, which they should. The family of the deceased can file a lawsuit for the defective part. During the discovery phase the truth would come out way faster than the crack team of sleuths at the NHTSA finished their four star dinner with GM executives. Regulation breeds complacency and false security. Regulators are fallible. Who knows what society has lost ( better gas mileage, faster cars, real electrics!) Because of the NHTSA.
That's the worst part! People are actually dumb enough to trust the stock market because they its safe from regulations. Regulation breeds complacency and a false sense of security.
Re:The Free Market has the Technology Now
on
The Great Taxi Upheaval
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
Sorry, but I'll stick with innovation over regulation.
If one app has one price and says they are the cheapest and another app has their price and says they are the cheapest I am capable of the critical thinking skills necessary to ignore the cheapest statements and look at the price. It's something I was just born with.
What was previously missing from the free market was perfect information. We live in an age where perfect information can be possible. Over regulation is now a hindrance to society.
I agree. If the current media want trying so hard to be the political wing of the government then people would take their credibility more seriously. You have parts of the media actively censoring information that is "inconvenient" for the government.
Let me just clarify, that sure fine, Apple developers earn more money from apps. But when your developing a free app that is purely an interface for your hardware it's best not to disclude 90% of the market because you bought a first gen iPad from Steve Jobs for $900.
Oh, I volunteered in a hospice and the octogenarian told me iPads are the coolest thing for people older than baby boomers. It's like a simpler, less useful version of an android tablet. Whenever I see a Kickstarter or product favour Apple over the other operating system that happens to obliterate the market it makes me cringe at the hypothetical stubbornness and lack of foresight that is necessary to develop for Apple.
I'm going to go ahead and play devil's advocate. I hate them both. I use a local, small ISP that has it's own network and doesn't piggy back. They are awesome and I won't go back to horrible AT&T or Comcast.
But in the same breath if you asked me if I'd rather buy internet from a company that knows what they are doing or the bus driver I'd choose those two companies I hate. The reasons are partly unionization, which kills any figment of innovation, and is unfortunately inherent in government "service", and naivete. The dumbest, most ignorant, cities are the one's who think they are capable of all the steps necessary to run socialized ISP's.
My solution is to remind ourselves that we created this mess, not through too little government, but way too much. Google fiber has forced cities to weaken their archaic and crony laws. Magically, things got a little better. But unfortunately I'd argue it's still crony. Create a level playing field for all competitors, not just Google Fiber. If you deregulate it they will come. You don't even need to get the librarians who are well versed in the intertubes to run tech support either.
Hockey sticks? If the Heartland Institute is biased at least taxpayers don't have to subsidize their hypothetical lies. What's worse? A private entity lying to you or a government entity you pay for and are supposed to be able to trust lying to you?
Following the link to their demo provides an explanation of their product. At the bottom of their explanation it has a link to their website. To follow the link to their website they use a windows editor context to press the cntrl key to follow the link. My joke was about an OS specific context to perform a simple function.
Additionally, who said anything about forced by the government? Would you buy a house where the developer failed to build roads? Oh sorry a market regulated self truth. I forgot, these things only magically occur by Fiat.
I like how you don't see the difference in Federal governmentabs local. No one minds having local governments mandate this, you could always move. We can't be American and move out of Obamacare.
Even since the forties, maybe thirties, when a developer wants to build X amount of homes then they are required to build the roads around each home. I know you didn't think when you just shut down his answer but the government didn't just come in and build roads around each home. Plus most proper highways were built by companies as turnpikes long before the freeway system.
Since you thought it was easier to ignore what I said after my first sentence (maybe that's all you bothered to read or maybe something ideologically different from what you believed caused some type of mental blockage) I thought I'd provide a quick excerpt from Justice Alito today who essentially made the exact same argument I did. "A corporation is simply a form of organization used by human beings to achieve desired ends," he wrote. "And protecting the free-exercise rights of corporations like Hobby Lobby, Conestoga and Mardel protects the religious liberty of the humans who own and control those companies."
This is a dead topic. Since no one else will receive the benefit of my post I'll just summarize really quick.
Corporations are a free expression of how individuals want to conduct business and earn a profit. Recent Supreme Court decisions especially have been expanding the individuals ability to exercise free speech in any organized manner.
Slashdot Mirror
That's the problem with these Chinese social networking soldiers. They try to use hypocrisy to say that things are either okay or not China's fault. You're right. America can be a hypocrite and still say true statements
The Chinese social networking army has really fluent English speakers.
You make me want to download lantern. Back in the day the United States was actively promoting democracy. France, our biggest ally in the revolution received a colds shoulder from us as we favored the rebellion. Screw China and screw totalitarianism.
The United States Court System is already designed to deal with this. Without, sadly, multiple regulatory bodies. Let's say the Highway Patrol Service determines the cause of the death, which they should. The family of the deceased can file a lawsuit for the defective part. During the discovery phase the truth would come out way faster than the crack team of sleuths at the NHTSA finished their four star dinner with GM executives. Regulation breeds complacency and false security. Regulators are fallible. Who knows what society has lost ( better gas mileage, faster cars, real electrics!) Because of the NHTSA.
That's the worst part! People are actually dumb enough to trust the stock market because they its safe from regulations. Regulation breeds complacency and a false sense of security.
Sorry, but I'll stick with innovation over regulation.
If one app has one price and says they are the cheapest and another app has their price and says they are the cheapest I am capable of the critical thinking skills necessary to ignore the cheapest statements and look at the price. It's something I was just born with.
What was previously missing from the free market was perfect information. We live in an age where perfect information can be possible. Over regulation is now a hindrance to society.
I agree. If the current media want trying so hard to be the political wing of the government then people would take their credibility more seriously. You have parts of the media actively censoring information that is "inconvenient" for the government.
You're. Blaming auto type on a non-stock keyboard.
Let me just clarify, that sure fine, Apple developers earn more money from apps. But when your developing a free app that is purely an interface for your hardware it's best not to disclude 90% of the market because you bought a first gen iPad from Steve Jobs for $900.
Oh, I volunteered in a hospice and the octogenarian told me iPads are the coolest thing for people older than baby boomers. It's like a simpler, less useful version of an android tablet. Whenever I see a Kickstarter or product favour Apple over the other operating system that happens to obliterate the market it makes me cringe at the hypothetical stubbornness and lack of foresight that is necessary to develop for Apple.
I'm going to go ahead and play devil's advocate. I hate them both. I use a local, small ISP that has it's own network and doesn't piggy back. They are awesome and I won't go back to horrible AT&T or Comcast.
But in the same breath if you asked me if I'd rather buy internet from a company that knows what they are doing or the bus driver I'd choose those two companies I hate. The reasons are partly unionization, which kills any figment of innovation, and is unfortunately inherent in government "service", and naivete. The dumbest, most ignorant, cities are the one's who think they are capable of all the steps necessary to run socialized ISP's.
My solution is to remind ourselves that we created this mess, not through too little government, but way too much. Google fiber has forced cities to weaken their archaic and crony laws. Magically, things got a little better. But unfortunately I'd argue it's still crony. Create a level playing field for all competitors, not just Google Fiber. If you deregulate it they will come. You don't even need to get the librarians who are well versed in the intertubes to run tech support either.
Scientific model, not scientific fact. They are attempting to extrapolate future temperatures using previous temperatures. Fact only happens after.
And I don't think you caught my Michael Mann hockey stick reference. He lied, proving your argument wrong.
Hockey sticks? If the Heartland Institute is biased at least taxpayers don't have to subsidize their hypothetical lies. What's worse? A private entity lying to you or a government entity you pay for and are supposed to be able to trust lying to you?
Following the link to their demo provides an explanation of their product. At the bottom of their explanation it has a link to their website. To follow the link to their website they use a windows editor context to press the cntrl key to follow the link. My joke was about an OS specific context to perform a simple function.
Do I open up my Galaxy Note 3's pen context to perform a Microsoft Windows function or do I just use terminal to cntrl+ click?
That's the point. Who would buy a home with no road to it? There is a market based solution for everything.
Additionally, who said anything about forced by the government? Would you buy a house where the developer failed to build roads? Oh sorry a market regulated self truth. I forgot, these things only magically occur by Fiat.
I like how you don't see the difference in Federal governmentabs local. No one minds having local governments mandate this, you could always move. We can't be American and move out of Obamacare.
How is my ancestors building civilization having anything to do with my subsidizing people currently who live in the society my ancestors built?
Even since the forties, maybe thirties, when a developer wants to build X amount of homes then they are required to build the roads around each home. I know you didn't think when you just shut down his answer but the government didn't just come in and build roads around each home. Plus most proper highways were built by companies as turnpikes long before the freeway system.
Since you thought it was easier to ignore what I said after my first sentence (maybe that's all you bothered to read or maybe something ideologically different from what you believed caused some type of mental blockage) I thought I'd provide a quick excerpt from Justice Alito today who essentially made the exact same argument I did. "A corporation is simply a form of organization used by human beings to achieve desired ends," he wrote. "And protecting the free-exercise rights of corporations like Hobby Lobby, Conestoga and Mardel protects the religious liberty of the humans who own and control those companies."
I apologize. I noticed in my post that I failed to clarify. I meant the employers freedom of speech to run their business as they want.
This is a dead topic. Since no one else will receive the benefit of my post I'll just summarize really quick.
Corporations are a free expression of how individuals want to conduct business and earn a profit. Recent Supreme Court decisions especially have been expanding the individuals ability to exercise free speech in any organized manner.