Technically, the actual diagnosis of the pedophilia disorder is explicitly an extreme. Ignoring the public idiot usage extending to attraction to adolescents, the shrinks (of both bibles IIRC) specify that it's only regarded as a disorder if it's nigh exclusive or compelling, so a more general category includes at least some minority of the officially non-pathological "general public".
Considering how general rapists are very rarely those hard up for sex partners, child molesters very probably aren't acting due to mere sexual frustration either. People regularly ignore that parent molesters, as a particularly blatant example, often still have a sexual relationship with the other parent overlapping the molestation, even continuing decades past the end of the molestation period. They weren't just horny...
My example? The bias in family courts is due to the FEMINIST "tender years" doctrine, which basically rests on female emotion being fucking nature magic, which is still being pushed today. Males are painted as dull aggressors by the feminist lobby as a rule. Your presumption of male emotions, likewise, more befits the feminist doctrine that males need female to tell them how they should feel than any real defense of males. If they get their way, there will be even more sexist laws targeting me and more deluded princesses preaching at me from atop their bloating pretense.
Funny, when they play their fiddle, the great majority of men proudly dance to their tune. Most men's power is spoken for by another. This was always so. Men tend not to lament they're tools who are too ashamed admit it or so mindfucked to be proud of it.
Raising awareness it doing something. Feminists have sold so damn much misandric rhetoric as sacrosanct bellyfeel "fact", it's nigh impossible to get taken seriously. Officially, the feminist lobby will openly destroy and demonize any attempt to stop them from pushing more biased laws policies, much less to correct anything already in place.
You do realize domesticated there exactly means sheeplized? Most became proud servants to sleazy incompetents and psychotics. That was always civilization's primary purpose.
Social behavior can often maladaptive. It this case though, I'd imagine if predation became more of an issue the better fighters would suddenly be more attractive...unless they've gone too far down the pacifist path to survive the interim. Well, for the bighorns. Pugilism's primarily useless in similar human cases. Oddly, it can attract women specifically easier to impregnate though. Attraction's rarely an intelligent matter for any species.
They arrest minors for producing self content, and, if they're old enough, charge and jail them as adults. Of course, this has little to nothing to do with protecting "children".
Considering most holders of CP probably rarely had anything to do with its making, and visual records made by other criminals of their crimes is legal to own and view, it's already primarily thoughtcrime. Most people targeted are even normal. The diagnosis for pedophilia requires an extreme focus of strong attraction relative to any other attraction, and ephibaphilia's not even officially a diagnosis due the explicit rejection of it being either pathological or abnormal. Most so-called "CP" would be "consumed" by ephibaphiles, and it doesn't matter if the "victims" made it themselves for fun, so yeah...very thoughtcrime, very kill-the-icky. "Victims" occasionally are charged and jailed for their own production.
You do realize that normality is explicitly excluded by definitions of psychosis and privileged in all other cases? They push normality even when it's provably pathological; then, diagnosis any more functional abnormals with a "social disorder" if they don't fit in with the pathological normals. The only time they actually try to change anything mainstream is to fit some political agenda for control and profit.
Anyone else amused with the irony of "liberal" here being US liberal and not rest of the world liberal (roughly US libertarian (mostly ignoring the "official" "Libertarian" party))?
Ah, the shrinks.. They said I was brilliant and on the best track to a better life possible then asked why I was there. Well, not counting the campus sleaze-bag with busty intern who thought I should emulate him to pick up women... Unsurprisingly, this doesn't change my history or the general reality of families. Seek help yourself, you're delusional, probably violently so. It's normal sadly.
Oh, someone's a freak but not who you seem to think. I don't know many people that can honestly say that "care and protection" exemplifies their family, regardless of what they admittedly pretend in front of the others. It's mostly about politics and emotional manipulations. Aside from saccharine tactics, terrorizing children to force pretenses of emotion and false declarations of belief out of them are the norm. It's Stockholm syndrome, along with about every other form of brainwashing tactic ever devised, with extensive state and social backing. Personally, like plenty of non-PC people risking getting branded as "sociopath" and reflexively socially ostracized as defective, they were consciously the worst enemies I've ever had in my life since age fucking 2...
Funny, I thought women were soldiers too in Israel... A bit hard to not "hide" behind civilians when 1) you are one and 2) in your own backyard.
You sound like the dumbshit US soldiers complaining about people carrying weapons in Afghanistan when the entire area's a fucking demilitarized zone when not outright a war-zone. Of course, they're both armed and in civilian areas. It's their opponents that're insanely myopic about how over-privileged their position is. Rolling tanks down streets, while daring anyone to use their own bloody roads in accordance to local laws, then bitching about the locals carrying AKs...
Then why are their laws that explicitly discriminate against Palestinian citizens? And kudos on handwaving capricious applications of military "law" applied to civilians outside Israel proper, just under their jackboot-heel...
There is no good. There is only power. Initiation of force is the issue, but political bullshit already loaded that. Monsters ironically were originally juxtaposed with heroes primarily in that heroes were prettier to humans. Most were overprivileged douche-nozzles as many monsters were just hermits from an older world that occasionally got in the way of some king or mob's plans. Why submit yourself to psychotic abusers, if you have any other choice? You're not a better person for being their pretentious slave but increasingly less of a person. Ironically, the NSA are monsters making monsters in service of the worst monsters the world has ever seen. Serve them or theirs and you're a monster too, just a sniveling little toady bitch on the bottom, another proud cog in the growing totalitarian machine.br"Sometimes peace is another word for surrender."
"Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?" Might want to look up slave morality though. Those who refuse to eat monsters just make them well fed. Would I want to be "friends" with people that expect me to dive under the bus when useful to them? Reciprocity rarely exists in reality, mostly just the pretense wrapped in sophistry, and it's assumption is of no utility when you lose more than you gain.
Mostly I leave people the fuck alone and wish they neutrally fucked off. Even the well meaning are mostly parasitic to me and obstacles to my purposes. The golden rule is pyrite but makes for a nice beatin' stick when its bruises double as scarlet letters for violation of a given subculture's version of PC. "Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others." "Politics, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage."
Ironic. The "more human" one actually passed by failing the "humanity" test. Leon was genuinely disturbed by the questions though not exactly in a "normal" manner. Rachael was a flat-line. That implication was personally disturbing and confusing as child. Even weirder now since I notice neurotypicals would likewise pass such by failing while real autists would more likely fail by passing, though the former would be way more likely to shoot you, natch.
Also, reminds me of Robocop (the series...) noting a politician was passing his voice stress analyzer by such deep conditioning that he couldn't even intentionally fail. Those'd easily pass such an emotion test would more likely fail such a stress test and vice versa. How much "empathy" nowadays is shallow, myopic, conditioned cliche? Lack of empathy for acceptable targets not only gets free passes but even can count for empathy points via privileging of "normality" and its redefining "humanity" as a term of social approval. The socially recognized "nice" people are usually the most deluded and/or deceitful.
Force vaginal intercourse or fellatio ON a male isn't classified as "sexual assault" in NC, much less "rape". It's just a misdemeanor instead of a felony. Quite an issue. There's a similar situation in the UK and apparently Texas as per the poster I was originally replying to before your proudly ignorant sexists trolled in.
Which is why the "invective" wasn't the fucking argument. Again, embarrassing. Might want to get back to learning logic since sophistry's clearly addled your cognitive faculties, whether intentional or not.
That must be embarrassing since that part wasn't the argument. Might want to look up red herring, if want to learn logic someday. It's not actually a fish...
Slashdot Mirror
Idiocracy...
Technically, the actual diagnosis of the pedophilia disorder is explicitly an extreme. Ignoring the public idiot usage extending to attraction to adolescents, the shrinks (of both bibles IIRC) specify that it's only regarded as a disorder if it's nigh exclusive or compelling, so a more general category includes at least some minority of the officially non-pathological "general public".
Considering how general rapists are very rarely those hard up for sex partners, child molesters very probably aren't acting due to mere sexual frustration either. People regularly ignore that parent molesters, as a particularly blatant example, often still have a sexual relationship with the other parent overlapping the molestation, even continuing decades past the end of the molestation period. They weren't just horny...
My example? The bias in family courts is due to the FEMINIST "tender years" doctrine, which basically rests on female emotion being fucking nature magic, which is still being pushed today. Males are painted as dull aggressors by the feminist lobby as a rule. Your presumption of male emotions, likewise, more befits the feminist doctrine that males need female to tell them how they should feel than any real defense of males. If they get their way, there will be even more sexist laws targeting me and more deluded princesses preaching at me from atop their bloating pretense.
Funny, when they play their fiddle, the great majority of men proudly dance to their tune. Most men's power is spoken for by another. This was always so. Men tend not to lament they're tools who are too ashamed admit it or so mindfucked to be proud of it.
Raising awareness it doing something. Feminists have sold so damn much misandric rhetoric as sacrosanct bellyfeel "fact", it's nigh impossible to get taken seriously. Officially, the feminist lobby will openly destroy and demonize any attempt to stop them from pushing more biased laws policies, much less to correct anything already in place.
You do realize domesticated there exactly means sheeplized? Most became proud servants to sleazy incompetents and psychotics. That was always civilization's primary purpose.
Humans evolved in bands not tribes.
Social behavior can often maladaptive. It this case though, I'd imagine if predation became more of an issue the better fighters would suddenly be more attractive...unless they've gone too far down the pacifist path to survive the interim. Well, for the bighorns. Pugilism's primarily useless in similar human cases. Oddly, it can attract women specifically easier to impregnate though. Attraction's rarely an intelligent matter for any species.
They arrest minors for producing self content, and, if they're old enough, charge and jail them as adults. Of course, this has little to nothing to do with protecting "children".
Considering most holders of CP probably rarely had anything to do with its making, and visual records made by other criminals of their crimes is legal to own and view, it's already primarily thoughtcrime. Most people targeted are even normal. The diagnosis for pedophilia requires an extreme focus of strong attraction relative to any other attraction, and ephibaphilia's not even officially a diagnosis due the explicit rejection of it being either pathological or abnormal. Most so-called "CP" would be "consumed" by ephibaphiles, and it doesn't matter if the "victims" made it themselves for fun, so yeah...very thoughtcrime, very kill-the-icky. "Victims" occasionally are charged and jailed for their own production.
You do realize that normality is explicitly excluded by definitions of psychosis and privileged in all other cases? They push normality even when it's provably pathological; then, diagnosis any more functional abnormals with a "social disorder" if they don't fit in with the pathological normals. The only time they actually try to change anything mainstream is to fit some political agenda for control and profit.
Anyone else amused with the irony of "liberal" here being US liberal and not rest of the world liberal (roughly US libertarian (mostly ignoring the "official" "Libertarian" party))?
Ah, the shrinks.. They said I was brilliant and on the best track to a better life possible then asked why I was there. Well, not counting the campus sleaze-bag with busty intern who thought I should emulate him to pick up women... Unsurprisingly, this doesn't change my history or the general reality of families. Seek help yourself, you're delusional, probably violently so. It's normal sadly.
Oh, someone's a freak but not who you seem to think. I don't know many people that can honestly say that "care and protection" exemplifies their family, regardless of what they admittedly pretend in front of the others. It's mostly about politics and emotional manipulations. Aside from saccharine tactics, terrorizing children to force pretenses of emotion and false declarations of belief out of them are the norm. It's Stockholm syndrome, along with about every other form of brainwashing tactic ever devised, with extensive state and social backing. Personally, like plenty of non-PC people risking getting branded as "sociopath" and reflexively socially ostracized as defective, they were consciously the worst enemies I've ever had in my life since age fucking 2...
Funny, I thought women were soldiers too in Israel... A bit hard to not "hide" behind civilians when 1) you are one and 2) in your own backyard.
You sound like the dumbshit US soldiers complaining about people carrying weapons in Afghanistan when the entire area's a fucking demilitarized zone when not outright a war-zone. Of course, they're both armed and in civilian areas. It's their opponents that're insanely myopic about how over-privileged their position is. Rolling tanks down streets, while daring anyone to use their own bloody roads in accordance to local laws, then bitching about the locals carrying AKs...
Then why are their laws that explicitly discriminate against Palestinian citizens? And kudos on handwaving capricious applications of military "law" applied to civilians outside Israel proper, just under their jackboot-heel...
Nope, just the one circus. The two rings are part of the same show.
There is no good. There is only power. Initiation of force is the issue, but political bullshit already loaded that. Monsters ironically were originally juxtaposed with heroes primarily in that heroes were prettier to humans. Most were overprivileged douche-nozzles as many monsters were just hermits from an older world that occasionally got in the way of some king or mob's plans. Why submit yourself to psychotic abusers, if you have any other choice? You're not a better person for being their pretentious slave but increasingly less of a person. Ironically, the NSA are monsters making monsters in service of the worst monsters the world has ever seen. Serve them or theirs and you're a monster too, just a sniveling little toady bitch on the bottom, another proud cog in the growing totalitarian machine.br"Sometimes peace is another word for surrender."
"Is it better to out-monster the monster or to be quietly devoured?"
Might want to look up slave morality though. Those who refuse to eat monsters just make them well fed. Would I want to be "friends" with people that expect me to dive under the bus when useful to them? Reciprocity rarely exists in reality, mostly just the pretense wrapped in sophistry, and it's assumption is of no utility when you lose more than you gain.
Mostly I leave people the fuck alone and wish they neutrally fucked off. Even the well meaning are mostly parasitic to me and obstacles to my purposes. The golden rule is pyrite but makes for a nice beatin' stick when its bruises double as scarlet letters for violation of a given subculture's version of PC.
"Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others."
"Politics, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage."
Ironic. The "more human" one actually passed by failing the "humanity" test. Leon was genuinely disturbed by the questions though not exactly in a "normal" manner. Rachael was a flat-line. That implication was personally disturbing and confusing as child. Even weirder now since I notice neurotypicals would likewise pass such by failing while real autists would more likely fail by passing, though the former would be way more likely to shoot you, natch.
Also, reminds me of Robocop (the series...) noting a politician was passing his voice stress analyzer by such deep conditioning that he couldn't even intentionally fail. Those'd easily pass such an emotion test would more likely fail such a stress test and vice versa. How much "empathy" nowadays is shallow, myopic, conditioned cliche? Lack of empathy for acceptable targets not only gets free passes but even can count for empathy points via privileging of "normality" and its redefining "humanity" as a term of social approval. The socially recognized "nice" people are usually the most deluded and/or deceitful.
Force vaginal intercourse or fellatio ON a male isn't classified as "sexual assault" in NC, much less "rape". It's just a misdemeanor instead of a felony. Quite an issue. There's a similar situation in the UK and apparently Texas as per the poster I was originally replying to before your proudly ignorant sexists trolled in.
Which is why the "invective" wasn't the fucking argument. Again, embarrassing. Might want to get back to learning logic since sophistry's clearly addled your cognitive faculties, whether intentional or not.
You made it quite clear you were ignoring any point I actually made. I don't have to debunk you when you do it yourself.
That I lost by being right? Yeah, that's not irony. That's idiocy.
That must be embarrassing since that part wasn't the argument. Might want to look up red herring, if want to learn logic someday. It's not actually a fish...