Do they sell capacity in their most advanced process?
They have for prior nodes, though not at first when it's brand new.
I'd imagine that they sell capacity in their depreciated fabs w/ older processes. However, since Intel is so far ahead of others, even that is a major boost for customers (like Altera), and b'cos Intel has some of the best practices in handling fabs, they do know that they'll get quality there w/ it! But I wouldn't be surprised at Intel reserving its most advanced processes for things like Xeons or i7s
I've read that their announced goal for 14nm capacity will be more than all other fab capacity worldwide combined. If true, that seems to indicate aggressive expansion into selling capacity.
If the copyrights are registered, then statutory damages are available, so there would be a huge sum of money involved without having to prove actual damages.
They only have one 14nm fab right now, and it only makes Intel chips. Maybe they'd sell some 22nm, I dunno, and that might be of interest for a GPU, but they aren't selling 14nm at this time near as I know.
Their announced plans for 14nm fabs are vastly more than what they need to supply their own chips--in fact, more than all the world's other fab production combined. Doesn't sound to me like they're planning on hoarding it forever.
I was under the impression that the Wall Street Journal's editorial pages had always been like this.
No. They were always conservative, as one would expect from a business-oriented publication. But back in the 80s & 90s they were at least intelligent. That has not been the case for years now. To be clear, I used to read it daily, but quit because it degenerated into such a piece of shit.
Consult your usual biases and experience regarding which drive is likely to fail or not - this was strictly a benchmark review, and shockingly, the enterprise-grade drive with the highest rotational speed and biggest cache that costs the most money got the best score.
Or not. My experience (limited, a few dozen drives) was that all 3 of WD Seagate & HGST had problems and pretty terrible reliability in the 3-4TB generation, but so far the 6TB generation has been flawless for WD & HGST (have not installed any Seagates yet).
No, it doesn't. At least in the US, the original stays in the office. You might get a copy but even here in Nuttville we're not crazy enough to let the patient have the canonical record.
That would be entirely up to that doctor, and you have no reason whatsoever to doubt the accuracy of what he said.
You're a fucking idiot. His comment was in no way inappropriate.
...and a comment like that directed towards any group of people on a day they celebrate would be inappropriate.
Because of course no other group of people could ever be allowed to be grateful for anything else, not under any circumstances. And if such other group should dare to say anything to anyone, you automatically assume the comment was directed at you. You're a god-damned fool.
The only thing offensive is that some people continue to belief that their religious beliefs should be accepted as "universal truth".
Even worse are the fools who were offended by this tweet. It doesn't disrespect Jesus at all. But these fools are offended that Tyson would dare show respect to anyone else but Jesus.
How does such a pathetically idiotic post get modded up to 5???
Every living tree sequesters CO2, more forest area means more living trees.
The forest is only carbon neutral in the sense that it represents a stable carbon sink. Once mature, it neither adds nor reduces atmospheric CO2. But planting forest where there is none does most certainly reduce atmospheric CO2, for as long as the forest lasts.
By default, when the tree dies, it will rot and return all that CO2 back to the air. So it's not really a solution unless you sequester the wood after the tree dies.
Epic fail in the most simple of logic: every living tree sequesters CO2, more forest area means more living trees. (Or, in other words, in a forest, when one tree dies, others grow.)
Maybe this is a flaw with the English language. After all "its" vs "it's" conflicts with multiple rules of the language.
And yet, it is completely consistent with other pronouns (the most closely related other words and therefore the most logical rules to apply), and dead simple to remember:
The experiment from long ago cannot possibly have been tracking the micro-oscillations that this article discusses.
What makes you think that? It was possible to build sensitive eye-tracking systems long long ago. They were far bigger and more expensive than what you can cobble together with a Raspberry Pi, but they existed. Kids today have no idea what the prior generations accomplished with analog circuits;-)
The whole eye. Our eyes actually cannot detect a static edge, only transitions. The reason we can see non-moving objects is that the oscillations of the eye provide the transitions. There's a simple experiment from long ago which illustrates this vividly: put a black square on a white background, track a subject's eye motion and move that target with the eye motion so that the image is always hitting the retina at the same location, and voila, the subject cannot see that target.
Slashdot Mirror
And, analog gauges are not magically immune to failure...
How old were these old Macs? Probably not 7-10 years old.
7ish, IIRC.
Hmmm. Some of my clients finally upgraded old Macs in late 2014, for exactly parallel reasons, need to upgrade to a supported/recent OS version.
Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth
And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings...
Do they sell capacity in their most advanced process?
They have for prior nodes, though not at first when it's brand new.
I'd imagine that they sell capacity in their depreciated fabs w/ older processes. However, since Intel is so far ahead of others, even that is a major boost for customers (like Altera), and b'cos Intel has some of the best practices in handling fabs, they do know that they'll get quality there w/ it! But I wouldn't be surprised at Intel reserving its most advanced processes for things like Xeons or i7s
I've read that their announced goal for 14nm capacity will be more than all other fab capacity worldwide combined. If true, that seems to indicate aggressive expansion into selling capacity.
...it does factor into determining damages...
If the copyrights are registered, then statutory damages are available, so there would be a huge sum of money involved without having to prove actual damages.
They only have one 14nm fab right now, and it only makes Intel chips. Maybe they'd sell some 22nm, I dunno, and that might be of interest for a GPU, but they aren't selling 14nm at this time near as I know.
Their announced plans for 14nm fabs are vastly more than what they need to supply their own chips--in fact, more than all the world's other fab production combined. Doesn't sound to me like they're planning on hoarding it forever.
Sure we can.... Light years....
No, we can't. Think about it for a second ;-)
The only other manufacturer with 14nm capacity is Intel and there's no way Intel will sell them some capacity.
Riiiight. Because Intel never ever sells fab capacity.
Oh wait, they started doing that in 2010. Oops.
There's just a hiring pathology.
Yep. Dealing with it right now. Definitely worse now than the last time (10 years ago) I needed some new work to fill my schedule.
The nature of God is such that it cannot be proven. Otherwise, we lose the choice to believe.
Not really. After all, religious people choose not to believe all sorts of things that have been proven pretty thoroughly.
I was under the impression that the Wall Street Journal's editorial pages had always been like this.
No. They were always conservative, as one would expect from a business-oriented publication. But back in the 80s & 90s they were at least intelligent. That has not been the case for years now. To be clear, I used to read it daily, but quit because it degenerated into such a piece of shit.
Yes, and it was a total pain, although apparently a solution is being developed.
Too bad the solution (it has already been developed) works as poorly as everything else Apple does with cloud-based services and synching.
From what I understand, most American Christians are Evangelics.
Nope. They're a tiny minority. They're just extremely vocal and aggressive.
Consult your usual biases and experience regarding which drive is likely to fail or not - this was strictly a benchmark review, and shockingly, the enterprise-grade drive with the highest rotational speed and biggest cache that costs the most money got the best score.
Or not. My experience (limited, a few dozen drives) was that all 3 of WD Seagate & HGST had problems and pretty terrible reliability in the 3-4TB generation, but so far the 6TB generation has been flawless for WD & HGST (have not installed any Seagates yet).
No, it doesn't. At least in the US, the original stays in the office. You might get a copy but even here in Nuttville we're not crazy enough to let the patient have the canonical record.
That would be entirely up to that doctor, and you have no reason whatsoever to doubt the accuracy of what he said.
Obviously, this author does not know the first fucking thing about hospital EMRs ;-)
His comment was inappropriate...
You're a fucking idiot. His comment was in no way inappropriate.
...and a comment like that directed towards any group of people on a day they celebrate would be inappropriate.
Because of course no other group of people could ever be allowed to be grateful for anything else, not under any circumstances. And if such other group should dare to say anything to anyone, you automatically assume the comment was directed at you. You're a god-damned fool.
The only thing offensive is that some people continue to belief that their religious beliefs should be accepted as "universal truth".
Even worse are the fools who were offended by this tweet. It doesn't disrespect Jesus at all. But these fools are offended that Tyson would dare show respect to anyone else but Jesus.
How does such a pathetically idiotic post get modded up to 5???
Every living tree sequesters CO2, more forest area means more living trees.
The forest is only carbon neutral in the sense that it represents a stable carbon sink. Once mature, it neither adds nor reduces atmospheric CO2. But planting forest where there is none does most certainly reduce atmospheric CO2, for as long as the forest lasts.
By default, when the tree dies, it will rot and return all that CO2 back to the air. So it's not really a solution unless you sequester the wood after the tree dies.
Epic fail in the most simple of logic: every living tree sequesters CO2, more forest area means more living trees. (Or, in other words, in a forest, when one tree dies, others grow.)
Maybe this is a flaw with the English language. After all "its" vs "it's" conflicts with multiple rules of the language.
And yet, it is completely consistent with other pronouns (the most closely related other words and therefore the most logical rules to apply), and dead simple to remember:
his hers its
he's she's it's
The experiment from long ago cannot possibly have been tracking the micro-oscillations that this article discusses.
What makes you think that? It was possible to build sensitive eye-tracking systems long long ago. They were far bigger and more expensive than what you can cobble together with a Raspberry Pi, but they existed. Kids today have no idea what the prior generations accomplished with analog circuits ;-)
What about our eyes is oscillating?
The whole eye. Our eyes actually cannot detect a static edge, only transitions. The reason we can see non-moving objects is that the oscillations of the eye provide the transitions. There's a simple experiment from long ago which illustrates this vividly: put a black square on a white background, track a subject's eye motion and move that target with the eye motion so that the image is always hitting the retina at the same location, and voila, the subject cannot see that target.
... why'd you instruct him? less to point and laugh at now.
Ah, but we can point and laugh even harder the next time--because I doubt the advice will stick ;-)