Ok. Forgive me if MS just discovering this makes me think they just entered 2002. That crap is _not_ new folks.
On the other hand, what idiot spouts off about two hosting companies being responsible without naming them? Seriously. This isn't Fark, you can't get kicked off for calling some asshole out.
You keep saying the same shit over and over and over in this thread.
Here's an opportunity to say the same shit in response to my post. (Use the "Reply to This" link below.)
It seems to me, the shit you are saying is in fact, incorrect as lots and lots of sites cache stuff, and the US Government does a boatload of it during warrantless searches of random data all over the internet. So you need to wake up and say "hi" to a reality that is other than your fantasy land.
Yeah, and for a little while using the robots.txt file would cause it to go back and "hide" the previous archive. (If you take it out, it comes back. For actual deletion you gotta request it.)
I think this woman is just off her meds. Somewhere, there's a village missing it's idiot.
I am tired of cheap ass providers that have the shittiest proxy server service on the damn planet letting my users think the server is "under construction" for two days because of their pile of shit proxy decided to poke while I was rebooting and is too niggardly to go and check for a new version quicker than 48 hours later.
Make your shit work right, and nobody will notice it, dumbfuck.
How bout them apples Mr. Too Chickenshit To Use A Real Name?
In fact, he defends the tax so much he wrote a book about it. The argument of the book is basically saying the law that is in place is too lenient and it should be repealed for something like the old one that didn't have loopholes. He wants the rich to pay more taxes when they die.
From Wikipedia:
Gates is co-author, with Chuck Collins, of the book Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes, a defense of the estate tax.[2]
Hair and hair growth is a secondary sexual characteristic that is used by the opposite sex to determine breeding fitness.
Chicks with nice hair (listen to them talk amongst themselves sometime you might learn something) have proven they can be healthy enough for the 3 year marathon of having a kid. So the hair makes men want to screw them, and makes other women aware men want to screw the nice hair ones.
Why do you think the butch dykes cut their hair like Rosie ODonell? To remove the "I am a good breeder" social broadcasting.
Same applies to men to some extent, though cultural norms seem to have an easier time overcoming the hair measurement of fitness.
With large increases without changing industries or job roles (i.e..NET developer) across several jobs in a short time I'd suspect OP is not negotiating hard enough.
If other companies can afford to swoop in with a raise like that, you didn't get what you should have out of the company that currently employs you when you took that job in the first place.
If you want to switch, go ahead, but spend a lot of time getting the most you can out of them and then get some negotiating skills under your belt (there's books for that, don't read them at work).
Better yet, just negotiate a higher pay rate within the job you have... you have good evidence the going rate is higher.
I lost two raid 5 setups to those because they failed faster than we could replace them. (1 spare and several days for shipping) Out of the 7 we had in two servers, 5 of them failed so the nick name is not undeserved in my opinion.
Eat the cost, (seriously, how many folks really did order more and get the lower price) and chalk it up as the price you pay for not hiring programmers that can do simple math and going with the cheap ones instead.
Just modify the test "Vishnu has four arms. Ganesha rips off two of them. How many fingers does Vishnu have left?"
There's a hidden improvement in the ability to detect phishing when you force the phisher to make a live connection. A few of them in fact;
The phisher now has to have a live connection and has one step closer to them tracked in the log file. Sure, it's probably a compromised machine, but now the phisher NEEDS a compromised machine. Not all of them go to that trouble yet.
This raises the bar a bit on the phishers. (Ruling out the inept 14 year old ones with free web site hosts in Lichtenstein.)
Every bit counts. It is unfortunate that the banks can't seem to move fast enough to keep up with the game though...
Not before. When that loser-guy in the crappy car shows up and hands you an envelope, then marks it down on a list. THEN you are sued. Until then it's just more useless hot air from management.
Smile sweetly and tell him he's an asshole.
Then go on with your life.
Oh, and tell everybody else that works there they threatened to sue you for trying to quit on amicable terms. That sort of stuff sticks in people's minds for _years_ and may influence what they do in the future.
Sometimes it's better to be the first out and lose a little bit of money and opportunity than to go down with the (obviously) sinking ship.
If you are really pissed off about being threatened. Call the BSA on them.
The "already validated" database times out in something like 180 days.
You can take the same key after that and re-use it on completely different equipment.
Activation doesn't stop you, just slows you down.
I do this all the time on garbaged Dell boxes. The firm in my building throws them out (after wiping them of hardware that's useful) but the key is still on the box for me to harvest on the way to the landfill. I assume the new machines they get comes with Windows so nobody ever cares.
I have a whole list on a sheet somewhere that I use to do installs for folks who lost theirs or whatever. (Not putting any particular effort to screw MS, just don't want to bother doing the phone thing or looking for a CD that might not exist anymore.)
Which is usually triggered by lack of cookie or new IP or new operating system or browser or whatever.
In other words, in place of having to do some sort of extra assurance the user/password holder is legit, you can get this file to act like a cookie and bypass dumb questions about your dog. This thing is supposed to make the extra security step less of an annoyance, not replace a user/pass combo.
So, stealing the computer just means next time you log in (with your new computer) you have to put in "rover" along with your user/pass. (And then presumably get a new Flash token.)
If they are using Flash and a feature intended to help make sure they know you are using a computer you previously used it helps. (Like a cookie)
As part of a multi-factor authentication system it can help.
The probably are not using it as the primary authentication (account number, password). (If they are, they'll get shut down quickly.)
If your platform can't handle the Flash, chances are they'll make you go through a longer more customized login procedure, like answer previously arranged "security questions" and so on. It will be slower, but it will work.
There are some pretty aggressive new regulations concerning online banking login methods, so more and more of this stuff will be appearing. They will all still have a primary user/pass combo of some kind though.
Yes, and every poor sap that gets hit by a beer truck chasing his poodle across the road is also an "alcohol related traffic accident". (Unless the truck is empty at the time.)
The headline is misleading not in that it is inaccurate, but in that it lets someone draw the wrong conclusion about what it is saying. Excusable only if there is no other way to say the same thing without the unintended implication.
"Killed in Wii-related competition" sounds like she was next to some fat geek swinging the controller around and he hit her breaking her neck. "Wii-related" is only really means "during it's normal intended use".
The internet will be all about the gay porn star, and not so much about him. Plus, it will be easy to establish that it is NOT him and pass everything off as the gay porn star.
Unless you are the type to get creeped out just because porn exists, there's no down side.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok. Forgive me if MS just discovering this makes me think they just entered 2002. That crap is _not_ new folks.
On the other hand, what idiot spouts off about two hosting companies being responsible without naming them? Seriously. This isn't Fark, you can't get kicked off for calling some asshole out.
Heh.
Which is as it turns out a violation of the Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act (http://www.coppa.org/)
I wonder if "get thrown in padded room" is one of the penalties of violating that.
You keep saying the same shit over and over and over in this thread.
Here's an opportunity to say the same shit in response to my post. (Use the "Reply to This" link below.)
It seems to me, the shit you are saying is in fact, incorrect as lots and lots of sites cache stuff, and the US Government does a boatload of it during warrantless searches of random data all over the internet. So you need to wake up and say "hi" to a reality that is other than your fantasy land.
Yeah, and for a little while using the robots.txt file would cause it to go back and "hide" the previous archive. (If you take it out, it comes back. For actual deletion you gotta request it.)
I think this woman is just off her meds. Somewhere, there's a village missing it's idiot.
Yeah, except if you try to authenticate through it, it rebroadcasts the session and screws up a WebDav login.
Only solution, put in a complete bypass. Bypass so you can login. Great security that.
I am tired of cheap ass providers that have the shittiest proxy server service on the damn planet letting my users think the server is "under construction" for two days because of their pile of shit proxy decided to poke while I was rebooting and is too niggardly to go and check for a new version quicker than 48 hours later.
Make your shit work right, and nobody will notice it, dumbfuck.
How bout them apples Mr. Too Chickenshit To Use A Real Name?
GIS for "diatom"
http://images.google.com/images?q=diatoms
Uhm... No.
In fact, he defends the tax so much he wrote a book about it. The argument of the book is basically saying the law that is in place is too lenient and it should be repealed for something like the old one that didn't have loopholes. He wants the rich to pay more taxes when they die.
From Wikipedia:
Gates is co-author, with Chuck Collins, of the book Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes, a defense of the estate tax.[2]
The book on Amazon.com Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes
I haven't finished it yet because I use it to fall asleep... however your statement is not true in fact and spirit.
Hair and hair growth is a secondary sexual characteristic that is used by the opposite sex to determine breeding fitness.
Chicks with nice hair (listen to them talk amongst themselves sometime you might learn something) have proven they can be healthy enough for the 3 year marathon of having a kid. So the hair makes men want to screw them, and makes other women aware men want to screw the nice hair ones.
Why do you think the butch dykes cut their hair like Rosie ODonell? To remove the "I am a good breeder" social broadcasting.
Same applies to men to some extent, though cultural norms seem to have an easier time overcoming the hair measurement of fitness.
Logic?
That isn't even English.
The stupid ones are anyway.
Too bad being lazy doesn't include sitting around thinking logical thoughts. Religion would go away overnight then....
With large increases without changing industries or job roles (i.e. .NET developer) across several jobs in a short time I'd suspect OP is not negotiating hard enough.
If other companies can afford to swoop in with a raise like that, you didn't get what you should have out of the company that currently employs you when you took that job in the first place.
If you want to switch, go ahead, but spend a lot of time getting the most you can out of them and then get some negotiating skills under your belt (there's books for that, don't read them at work).
Better yet, just negotiate a higher pay rate within the job you have... you have good evidence the going rate is higher.
"Desk Store" and "Serve Store" I believe.
I lost two raid 5 setups to those because they failed faster than we could replace them. (1 spare and several days for shipping) Out of the 7 we had in two servers, 5 of them failed so the nick name is not undeserved in my opinion.
That's why they don't all it "news".
Yeeesh.
Eat the cost, (seriously, how many folks really did order more and get the lower price) and chalk it up as the price you pay for not hiring programmers that can do simple math and going with the cheap ones instead.
Just modify the test "Vishnu has four arms. Ganesha rips off two of them. How many fingers does Vishnu have left?"
Well Charter in particular has been blocking DNS ports to anything but their DNS servers for a long time.
So running your own resolver on a Charter line probably will basically mean no DNS.
There's a hidden improvement in the ability to detect phishing when you force the phisher to make a live connection. A few of them in fact;
The phisher now has to have a live connection and has one step closer to them tracked in the log file. Sure, it's probably a compromised machine, but now the phisher NEEDS a compromised machine. Not all of them go to that trouble yet.
This raises the bar a bit on the phishers. (Ruling out the inept 14 year old ones with free web site hosts in Lichtenstein.)
Every bit counts. It is unfortunate that the banks can't seem to move fast enough to keep up with the game though...
Not before. When that loser-guy in the crappy car shows up and hands you an envelope, then marks it down on a list. THEN you are sued. Until then it's just more useless hot air from management.
Smile sweetly and tell him he's an asshole.
Then go on with your life.
Oh, and tell everybody else that works there they threatened to sue you for trying to quit on amicable terms. That sort of stuff sticks in people's minds for _years_ and may influence what they do in the future.
Sometimes it's better to be the first out and lose a little bit of money and opportunity than to go down with the (obviously) sinking ship.
If you are really pissed off about being threatened. Call the BSA on them.
Not getting in one of those things unless Homer Simpson is at the controls.
The "already validated" database times out in something like 180 days.
You can take the same key after that and re-use it on completely different equipment.
Activation doesn't stop you, just slows you down.
I do this all the time on garbaged Dell boxes. The firm in my building throws them out (after wiping them of hardware that's useful) but the key is still on the box for me to harvest on the way to the landfill. I assume the new machines they get comes with Windows so nobody ever cares.
I have a whole list on a sheet somewhere that I use to do installs for folks who lost theirs or whatever. (Not putting any particular effort to screw MS, just don't want to bother doing the phone thing or looking for a CD that might not exist anymore.)
User/Password = security step
Questions about dogs name = EXTRA security step
Which is usually triggered by lack of cookie or new IP or new operating system or browser or whatever.
In other words, in place of having to do some sort of extra assurance the user/password holder is legit, you can get this file to act like a cookie and bypass dumb questions about your dog. This thing is supposed to make the extra security step less of an annoyance, not replace a user/pass combo.
So, stealing the computer just means next time you log in (with your new computer) you have to put in "rover" along with your user/pass. (And then presumably get a new Flash token.)
If they are using Flash and a feature intended to help make sure they know you are using a computer you previously used it helps. (Like a cookie)
As part of a multi-factor authentication system it can help.
The probably are not using it as the primary authentication (account number, password). (If they are, they'll get shut down quickly.)
If your platform can't handle the Flash, chances are they'll make you go through a longer more customized login procedure, like answer previously arranged "security questions" and so on. It will be slower, but it will work.
There are some pretty aggressive new regulations concerning online banking login methods, so more and more of this stuff will be appearing. They will all still have a primary user/pass combo of some kind though.
Yes, and every poor sap that gets hit by a beer truck chasing his poodle across the road is also an "alcohol related traffic accident". (Unless the truck is empty at the time.)
The headline is misleading not in that it is inaccurate, but in that it lets someone draw the wrong conclusion about what it is saying. Excusable only if there is no other way to say the same thing without the unintended implication.
"Killed in Wii-related competition" sounds like she was next to some fat geek swinging the controller around and he hit her breaking her neck. "Wii-related" is only really means "during it's normal intended use".
The headline is more suitable for Fark, not here.
Or, more reasonably for the "prison take-down" teams they use to subdue unruly prisoners.
The first two guys are in these as they get a bit better use of limbs than holding the standard assault shield.
Then, the weight of them is a bonus because it'll help them pin the prisoner down.
That's actually a good thing.
The internet will be all about the gay porn star, and not so much about him. Plus, it will be easy to establish that it is NOT him and pass everything off as the gay porn star.
Unless you are the type to get creeped out just because porn exists, there's no down side.