As someone else suggested here, you'd probably have to find the author(s) of the code allegedly heisted.
I've wondered about issues of standing in such cases before. This is the sort of thing that would ensure that any such case would move up and down the appeals ladder for years. You'd need to get those people to agree to be parties in the suit. Presumably they would receive any damages. They'd also need someone to fund the suit, unless they actually work for someone (like IBM) with the inclination and resources to sue.
The real problem with Bluetooth for keyboards and mice is that you have to have batteries for these devices, when the conventional ones work off the 5v line from the PC. Pain in the ass! Just what I need while I'm working, to have to find a battery for my keyboard.
>> Class II "Warhol attacks"--such as the SQL Slammer worm that make themselves famous in 15 minutes--have emerged.... To combat this, Clyde says that patches would need to be developed more quickly and deployed continuously in an automated mode.
Of course, Slammer had been patched 6 months prior. So a big part of this problem is that people don't apply patches.
I'm the author of the column under discussion. I hope I got my point across that whatever merit I see in this I doubt it could succeed in less than a long time.
But I don't see the spam filtering and security companies as the main obstruction. I see millions of users and companies who would have to change applications as the real problem. Whatever the benefits, this would be highly disruptive. As others have pointed out, look at how long it's taken to get almost nowhere with IPv6.
The biggest advantage that online versions have is that they don't have to pay to produce content. They get the paper version's content for free. That's why I'm skeptical that the NYT online is actually profitable by any fair standard.
Your first impression was correct. It made no money at all, and any money Shawn made was out of dumb-ass investors' pockets. If you ask me, it had no serious potential for making money.
standard mascot equipment
on
T-Shirt Cannon
·
· Score: 1
No, you dipshit. Foreign nationals (i.e. non-citizens) from certain countries, including muslim countries, have to register. None of this applies to US citizens and it's not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion. Non-arabs and non-muslims from these countries have to register too.
Bad news buddy. This idea, specifically with respect to Java, has been had several times by many of the top companies in software. It's been a dreadful, embarassing failure every time.
Since this is a corporate key for servers, surely the licensee can provide to Microsoft a defined range of IP addresses where their servers might be found. The activation servers could look for activations from other addresses and reject them. Of if the user used a non-online method for activation they could require some other form of ID before getting the confirmation code. Someone tell me why this wouldn't work.
How can you raise the slammer worm and then say that Microsoft doesn't respond quickly? The article makes clear that attacks on Microsoft products were an average of 305 days after Microsoft patched them, and this was famously the case with respect to slammer. People aren't applying the patches in spite of clear warnings.
no, the registry is not a generalized database, it's a proprietary hierarchical store. Rhetorically you could call it a database, but you could call anything a database.
>>the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need.
How many people really NEED MS Office applications? Literally nobody. You can't claim on the one hand that Office applications suck and the alternatives are better and on the other that people can't stop using them. You can't claim on the one hand that nobody uses anything more than the simplest features and on the other that the file formats are a big problem, since the file formats for basic Office docs are well understood.
The truth here is that people used pirated copies because they didn't want to pay the price Microsoft asked. They're thieves.
Slashdot Mirror
As someone else suggested here, you'd probably have to find the author(s) of the code allegedly heisted.
I've wondered about issues of standing in such cases before. This is the sort of thing that would ensure that any such case would move up and down the appeals ladder for years. You'd need to get those people to agree to be parties in the suit. Presumably they would receive any damages. They'd also need someone to fund the suit, unless they actually work for someone (like IBM) with the inclination and resources to sue.
And obviously so. We've got to start coming down hard on these people, setting some prominant examples.
The real problem with Bluetooth for keyboards and mice is that you have to have batteries for these devices, when the conventional ones work off the 5v line from the PC. Pain in the ass! Just what I need while I'm working, to have to find a battery for my keyboard.
They learned me how to talk good
Of course, Slammer had been patched 6 months prior. So a big part of this problem is that people don't apply patches.
Same here. The word "crash" is obviously irrelevant. Just '' doesn't crash it though.
Mod-U-Up
Exactly on-point. Almost nothing would work with it. And what's the point anyway? THere's no value proposition.
I'm the author of the column under discussion. I hope I got my point across that whatever merit I see in this I doubt it could succeed in less than a long time.
But I don't see the spam filtering and security companies as the main obstruction. I see millions of users and companies who would have to change applications as the real problem. Whatever the benefits, this would be highly disruptive. As others have pointed out, look at how long it's taken to get almost nowhere with IPv6.
The biggest advantage that online versions have is that they don't have to pay to produce content. They get the paper version's content for free. That's why I'm skeptical that the NYT online is actually profitable by any fair standard.
...please scan it in, OCR it and "share" the contents with others on the net, because I don't think people should have to pay for it.
Your first impression was correct. It made no money at all, and any money Shawn made was out of dumb-ass investors' pockets. If you ask me, it had no serious potential for making money.
The Phillie Phanatic has had one of these for many years.
No, you dipshit. Foreign nationals (i.e. non-citizens) from certain countries, including muslim countries, have to register. None of this applies to US citizens and it's not specifically because of their ethnicity or religion. Non-arabs and non-muslims from these countries have to register too.
Bad news buddy. This idea, specifically with respect to Java, has been had several times by many of the top companies in software. It's been a dreadful, embarassing failure every time.
People don't want this type of client.
Since this is a corporate key for servers, surely the licensee can provide to Microsoft a defined range of IP addresses where their servers might be found. The activation servers could look for activations from other addresses and reject them. Of if the user used a non-online method for activation they could require some other form of ID before getting the confirmation code. Someone tell me why this wouldn't work.
Oh yeah? Punch cards!
None of that fancy-ass full-screen stuff for my girl. She uses TECO.
Does it support RFC 3514?
How can you raise the slammer worm and then say that Microsoft doesn't respond quickly? The article makes clear that attacks on Microsoft products were an average of 305 days after Microsoft patched them, and this was famously the case with respect to slammer. People aren't applying the patches in spite of clear warnings.
An experimental Python for .NET with full source and a whitepaper from our friends at ActiveState.
no, the registry is not a generalized database, it's a proprietary hierarchical store. Rhetorically you could call it a database, but you could call anything a database.
I don't want to quibble about the specific number, but how do they decide what is spam? Much of the decision is somewhat ambiguous.
Worse than that, they still have the new subscription page up and links to it on the site.
How can they have a corner on the market? Are Taiwanese not allowed to use Word Perfect? Or StarOffice?
Nobody has ever been forced to use a Microsoft product.
>>the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need.
How many people really NEED MS Office applications? Literally nobody. You can't claim on the one hand that Office applications suck and the alternatives are better and on the other that people can't stop using them. You can't claim on the one hand that nobody uses anything more than the simplest features and on the other that the file formats are a big problem, since the file formats for basic Office docs are well understood.
The truth here is that people used pirated copies because they didn't want to pay the price Microsoft asked. They're thieves.