Slashdot Mirror


Taiwan Forces MS To Cut Prices, Unbundle Software

bev_tech_rob writes "This article from ZDNet reports how Microsoft has agreed to cut prices on their software after a backlash from the country's effort to crack down on piracy. Seems the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need."

459 comments

  1. Robbin Hood by vizualizr · · Score: 2

    How long do I have before the BSA shows up at my door if I make the arguement that I was FORCED to use all those . .um ..demonstration copies ..of microsoft software because of the high cost?

    Yeah. Forced. Arm twisting and the whole deal.

    --
    anything i tell you will cloud your opinion.
    1. Re:Robbin Hood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because all operating systems are written by programmers, I assume that any operating system is much smarter than me. Thus, any good operating system should try to outsmart me by restricting my options at every turn. Linux, like all versions of Unix, is lousy at restricting my options because at the command line virtually any operation can be performed with ease. (For example, 'rm -rf /win' could 'delete an entire mounted directory, with no popup window warnings whatsoever.)

      I'm proud to say that there is no such danger in XP. Windows pop up when I want to make a change, and then more pop up to ask if I'm sure I want the change. Thankfully, Windows XP looks after my computer's well-being by occasionally switching configuration settings from the way I want them to what the OS programmers think they might probably ought to be. Boy, I'm just impressed with how smart they are. Once I learned to live with whatever the default settings are on any new hardware I install, I can't say the number of hours I have saved.

      I use that spare time to reboot my Windows XP machine multiple times a day. Technical support personnel recommend that I do it regularly-- kind of like brushing my teeth. To help remind me of this necessity, windows pop up to tell me to reboot whenever I make a configuration change. By now my machine is minty fresh, I figure.

      There is no such useful rebooting in a Linux system. It is as reliable as the sunrise, with uptimes in weeks, months and years. Virtually no configuration change requires a reboot, to boot. Imagine all that plaque in the computer. Gross!

      In XP I am prevented from making dangerous fundamental configuration changes unless I use a special "registry editor". I have found it so useful to have this separate editor that I hope in future versions they go all the way and supply a separate editor for each file on the disk-- in that way windows could pop up at every keystroke to warn me that changing any line in the file I am editing could cause the system to not run properly. If this were only the case, people would finally learn that it is best to just stick with the mouse and they would be freed of the need to constantly move their hands back to the keyboard. (If one stops to think about it, the mouse is a much better device to use than the keyboard. Ever hear of someone getting carpal tunnel syndrome from a mouse? No. It's comfortable and ergonomic. Like Morse code devices. That's how long distance communication started, after all.)

      Linux, by contrast, requires no special editor to change configuration files. The fact that there is no "registry" in Linux allows the abomination of using any text editor whatsoever to do the configuration. Can you believe that configuration files are usually stored clear text? Talk about dangerous!

      I am also happy to report that I have experienced no truth to the rumor that Windows disks become corrupt after improper shutdowns. Indeed, I have been forced to improperly shutdown the machine innumerable times after it locks up, and I have no apparent problems to report regarding the disk. No such claim can be made for Linux. They say something about lack of data points. Excuses are all I ever seem to hear from the Linux crowd.

      By sheer size alone, Windows XP beats Linux hands down. It is so much bigger, it is _obvious_ that it is better. Why would you want a small OS with the large disks and RAM sizes we have these days? For this reason alone, I heartily recommend Windows as a way to maximize resource utilization. Your CPU and disk will constantly be pegged to the limit, the way god intended. The Linux kernel and drivers accounts for only about 750KB. Why, even the Microsoft Win16 subsystem uses more space than that.

      It is no surprise that Windows XP costs $300 on the retail market and Linux doesn't cost anything. People know what they want, and they want Windows XP. Because Linux is free, that means it's basically worthless. The same goes for all the development tools, remotable GUIs, and applications, which all cost money for Windows (i.e., are worth something) and free for Linux (worthless!).

      Installing software is very easy in Windows XP. I usually slip in CDs without even reading instructions or warnings, and just double click on whatever window pops up. There is no need to read anything or touch the keyboard. (Did I mention that I hate that thing?) Well, OK, I have learned the hard way the machine locks up if I don't take the time to close all other applications.

      Linux, by contrast, requires typing on the keyboard to get anything to install at all. And you always have to know the NAME of program you want to install. For example, in Slackware, you have to type "pkgtool" to install a program. Linux needs to get with the 21st century!

      Windows XP follows the DOS convention of putting \r\n at the end of every line of a text file. While this is only a mild concern because of the relative rarity of text files on Windows machines these days-- thank god--it helps to differentiate between the text files and the other files. Sadly, Linux makes no distinction between text and other files.

      If I legitimately purchase Windows XP, I can call Microsoft customer support to get help with my problems. After a short hold time of an hour or so, they always help me. Ever since I told them that I was dual booting to Linux, they were able to flag my account and now each time I call even the entry level support personnel I am connected to say that Linux is the source of my problems. Everyone seems to agree that Linux is no good. The more I listen, the more I'm impressed with the knowledge of the support staff there.

      By contrast, in Linux, all I have is stockpiles of resources and documentation that I would actually have to read in order to understand. Sure, I could obtain Linux support from a commercial organization, but they would probably just tell me I have to use a text editor to fix up my system.

      In the end, I have no need for that old computer donkey Unix. I don't need to run big Unix tasks, after all. I refuse to become one of those a bug-eyed computer users, that's for sure. As soon as I can keep Windows XP from crashing for long enough, I'm going to delete my Linux partition, i.e., the equivalent of moving it to the Recycle Bin, saying that I'm sure, emptying the Recycle Bin, and again saying that I'm sure I want to empty it.

    2. Re:Robbin Hood by w42w42 · · Score: 1

      This should be modded +6 Classic

    3. Re:Robbin Hood by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > As soon as I can keep Windows XP from crashing for long enough, I'm going to delete my Linux partition

      Wait long enough and I'm sure a script kiddie will do it for you.

    4. Re:Robbin Hood by XiChimos · · Score: 1

      "Because Linux is free, that means it's basically worthless" It is the work of countless individuals who make sure ingrates like you could work. If I thought you were more than a Windows-hog, then I would explain to you why your capitalist mind can't comprehend the thought of Open-source. Hide behind your anonymous status and if you want to chat, email me.

    5. Re:Robbin Hood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billy Boy Tosser!

    6. Re:Robbin Hood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... I think they were being sarcastic...

    7. Re:Robbin Hood by Ambrose · · Score: 1

      Hey, I have some Florida swampland ... er, I mean dot com stock I'd like to sell you ...

    8. Re:Robbin Hood by ArchKaine · · Score: 1

      I would think that the phrase "tongue in cheek" comes to mind when reading that large and fairly well written article above.
      Linux is far from worthless, and the poster (I forget the name at the moment) is very aware of that, since he sounds to me like a Linux user.
      On a different subject, I'd be using Linux too, if I could find drivers for my network card, and my sound card.
      But, for now, XP will do in a pinch.

      --
      Ignorance is blissful, to the ignorant.
    9. Re:Robbin Hood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people realize this is all sarcasm...right?

  2. Seems like someone got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad the US couldn't learn a little from Taiwan...

    1. Re:Seems like someone got it right by SkWaSH · · Score: 1

      amen. now that microsoft has given in, i hope that more countries follow suit, especially the US. (Maybe it's too bad that this didn't happen before the ruling of the anti-trust case?)

    2. Re:Seems like someone got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the ground breaking "Hoemaster's :15 Minute Solution"!!! The :15 Minute Solution is a simple 5 exercise, 15 minute a day program that will give you results without all the frustration associated with other available programs! Don't get beat up like our friend shown below!

      Enough of the crap...let's learn the techniques that will thicken and lengthen your penis, put an end to premature ejaculation, give you a Prostate Gland that will perform for you into your later years and get you ejaculating like Peter North!

      The four exercises are listed below. After you've learned the techniques go to the table at the bottom of the page and just follow the workout planner! It's all way too easy!

    3. Re:Seems like someone got it right by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Too bad the US couldn't lean what from Taiwan? Pirate over-priced monopoly-ware until MS throws in the towel and agrees to behave in a reasonable manner?

      ...uh, ok, well maybe we could that.

      ^_^

    4. Re:Seems like someone got it right by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Too bad the US couldn't learn a little from Taiwan...

      Too bad Taiwan couldn't learn a little from Peru.

      Honestly, I see no good reason anyone should have to endure Microsoft software any more.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  3. sure, no modchips :P by st0rmcold · · Score: 1

    Off course, when that they got the governement on the modchip problem they had, they are expecting greater revenue so they can "afford" to lower their already "cheap" prices. :P

    --
    Posting useless rant since 2003.
    1. Re:sure, no modchips :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Questions Every Business Should Ask
      About the GNU General Public License (GPL)

      On May 3, 2001, Microsoft publicly described its "Shared Source" approach to source code licensing. Shared Source covers Microsoft's spectrum of source access and licensing programs for its customers and partners. Microsoft has contrasted Shared Source with various open source software approaches, highlighting both similarities and differences. We encourage companies and individuals to consider carefully to what degree open source solutions make sense for them. While Microsoft does not oppose the concept of open source development, we do question the advisability of organizations' dependence on the products of a non-commercial community rather than commercially developed products that have a sustainable business model behind them.

      The general use of the term "open source" describes both the different community development processes and the vastly differing licenses under which these products are developed, modified and distributed. In particular, we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL) which covers some of the most popular open source software such as Linux. The GPL was developed specifically to discourage the development of commercial software and eliminate the creation of any long-term economic value in intellectual property that emerges from a community development process. This license diminishes, or even eliminates, the symbiotic relationship between academic and government research and the entire business community. There are benefits to having both an "intellectual commons" and businesses built on the premise of owning and profiting from intellectual property assets.

      Microsoft encourages companies to read and evaluate the GPL. Based upon feedback we have received to date, it appears that many businesses do not understand the GPL or its potential implications for important business issues. To highlight those issues, we drafted this document to give businesses interested in GPL software a list of questions to ask themselves and their lawyers, as well as some background that may be useful.

      Although many businesses may not be acquainted with the GPL, most (if not all) of the following questions will be familiar to people who have studied the GPL. In fact, many of these questions have been the subject of considerable discussion within the open source community. The Free Software Foundation (www.fsf.org) publishes the GPL and hosts a corresponding FAQ (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html). The comments in this document are based upon the Version 2 GPL, Version 2.1 Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the GPL FAQ posted as of 5/30/01.

      One last introductory note: the GPL is a complicated agreement. To understand your potential rights and obligations, you need to interpret the many provisions of the agreement and apply them to your particular facts. We recommend that you obtain counsel from your lawyer as appropriate. This document does not, and cannot, offer any legal advice.

  4. Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by gazbo · · Score: 0, Troll

    But why should MS be concerned? Taiwan was famous for nothing more than piracy - the theft of MS's software. Remind me why they would care about what Taiwan says?

    1. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by (1337)+God · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taiwan represents a very tech-saavy populace that's probably a close 2nd to South Korea in terms of computing skills. Even if Microsoft can get just half of all Microsoft-using citizens there to actually pay money for MS products, they will make an amazing profit that will line the pockets of MS executives.

      Taiwan is famous for more than just piracy, and your comment was rude and unnecessary. Most mass-produced toys are made in Taiwan because they perfected advanced assembly line techniques and could do it cheaper than the U.S.

      Join The (1337) Clan If You Have What It Takes!

      --

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    2. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rtfa. taiwan started a crackdown on warez and piracy (it's possible MS asked them), but there was backlash from citizens. they were saying that MS's monopoly, high costs, and bundling practices were forcing them into using pirated copies. therefore, taiwan listened to their own people (not a foreign company) and stood up for their citizens.

      result might still be good for ms. lower prices mean less taiwanese will pirate software, those people will buy legitly instead, leading to better profits for M$. (odd as it sounds, lowering prices can raise profits. it's basic micro-economics)

    3. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by angst911 · · Score: 1

      I believe the theory is called the Laffer curve

      --
      Taking over one bit at a time...
    4. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad another Taiwanese has spoken up. The eurocentric attitudes on this site can get really annoying. Really, if I wanted someone to look down on my ethnicity and heritage, I would go watch Bill O'Reilly on FOX. Please, let's keep the eurocentricity down and talk about "Stuff that matters", like this site is intended for.

    5. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Just a question-- you mention Bill O'Reilly. What has he said that makes you think he's, in your words, eurocentric? I'm serious.

    6. Re:Taiwan - famous for...paying for software? by mikio71 · · Score: 1
      Taiwan was famous for nothing more than piracy

      Umm... I beg your pardon? Maybe in the world of software, that statement could be true, but Taiwan has been very pivotal for personal computing today.

      Taiwan has the infrastructure to mass-produce semiconductors, which is what it is truly famous for, among other things. Dell wouldn't be around if it weren't for this fact, and you'd still be shelling out thousands of dollars for quality computer parts that are Made in the USA or Made in Japan... well, at least until China shapes up and gets into the game... but of course, with the exception of a few companies, most of the state-of-the-art factories doing mass production over there are from foreign companies, with Taiwanese companies in the forefront.

  5. What? by JanusFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, even with how much control over the computer industry MS has, I find it hard to believe that anyone can be 'forced' to pirate Windows, or Office, or whatever. There ARE free alternatives.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:What? by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but while they're free, they don't necessarily do the job. Despite what many on slashdot say, open source is not the end-all be-all of software. More to the point -- what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?

      (I fully expect to be modded down for this, but what the hell. I have karma to burn)

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:What? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      http://www.openoffice.org

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    3. Re:What? by Gerald · · Score: 1

      Show me a business worth $US 5 million or more that can exist without some form of Microsoft software.

    4. Re:What? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Google? At least the server farm seems to be running linux, and I suppose that it worth US$ 5 millon or more by now.

    5. Re:What? by opie92115 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm a new user to linux, only about 7 months, and I have had a really hard time getting the software to let me interact with MS files to work. It's installed and it runs but its sketchy at best and Samba seems to hate me. It's the only reasone I keep my old windows machine around. I really like Linux and I'm going to figure it all out but it is a royal pain to new users. Windows might be insecure and bug ridden but most of the time it works for the basic stuff I want to do.

    6. Re:What? by t0ny · · Score: 1

      If their business is worth $5m USD I think they can afford a few hundy for a Win2k server license.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    7. Re:What? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Political Scenario's 101:

      China sponsoring huge change to their own version of Linux.

      Taiwan resents being part of the R.O.C.

      Taiwan willing to do anything to silently jab mainland China.

      Taiwan is the economic leader of the entire R.O.C. If they use Windows for everything, then the rest of the R.O.C. will have to too, if they want it all to work right. ...

    8. Re:What? by Twanfox · · Score: 1

      When last I tried Staroffice (I think the forerunner of Openoffice?), even though it could open doc files, the niggling issues such as formatting, behavior differences in how it handled certain things (numbered lists) and similar made it a novelty, not something I could rely on. Not only that, the design of the program was that I had to load up everything to use one thing, and it wasn't as slick as I would've liked to use. (Ie: I didn't need yet another desktop just for my office suite).

      Of course, this was a few years ago, and through the changes, this might not be the same bit of office software I'm familiar with.

    9. Re:What? by Fez · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll probably get modded down too, but Microsoft does provide a free .doc viewer, and viewers for other formats here

      Of course that only works if the person is already running windows.

    10. Re:What? by fobbman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Open Office for Windows reads .doc files just fine.

    11. Re:What? by sckeener · · Score: 1

      Correct, but I wish file types were more standard. It is silly that I get a WORD document, print it out under WordPerfect (I support a legal department)and the formating is not the same because it had to be converted.

      I'd say there are alternatives to WORD when there are no formating differences between different applications.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    12. Re:What? by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      "even though [StarOffice] could open doc files, the niggling issues such as formatting, behavior differences in how it handled certain things (numbered lists)"

      I found these issues as well, however, I found it did a better job of importing .doc files than different versions of Word did.

    13. Re:What? by buswolley · · Score: 1
      ok. Besides Google.

      hmmm

      Red Hat? are they worth that much?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    14. Re:What? by malfunct · · Score: 1
      I agree that noone "forced" them to pirate windows but not because of free alternatives. Face it, if you could copy windows for free without the slightest hint of legal repercussions you probably would. I mean how much good is the "winodws manual" and how many of us really love that windows box?

      The issue is that the pirate software is free or close to free and there are no risks to using it so why not? I've found that most people don't have much in the way of morals when it comes to being a consumer, they really are only afraid of the man busting down on them.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    15. Re:What? by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      Huh?

      This comment doesn't make much sense.
      Taiwan is the economic leader of the entire R.O.C. If they use Windows for everything, then the rest of the R.O.C. will have to too, if they want it all to work right.
      I guess if Taiwan uses it, the people on the Pescadores, Matsu, and Querny will have to as well.

    16. Re:What? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is the Rebpublic of China. The mainland is The Peoples Rebpublic of China. Tawain *is* The R.O.C.

      http://www.flags.net/CHIN.htm

      http://www.flags.net/TAIW.htm

      And while mainland China claims that they are not independent it is clear to everyone involved that they are.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    17. Re:What? by Jondor · · Score: 1

      Sure, but you do prove the point here why people feel forced to pirate the stuff. The real power of MS is not in their OS but in the office suite. Call every windows computer a node, then the documents office produces are the connections between those nodes. If you want to (or need to) be connected.. Well. there you go..

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    18. Re:What? by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (I fully expect to be modded down for this, but what the hell. I have karma to burn)

      Kalidasa's first law of slashdot: any poster who mentions that he expects to be modded down will invariably be modded +5 insightful.

    19. Re:What? by 1010011010 · · Score: 4, Funny

      what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?

      Complain.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    20. Re:What? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      If you have a .doc that doesn't do something it can't handle. i've had enough trouble opening time sheets and such from secretaries that I can' use it. It does not have 100% compatibility.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    21. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ok? It doesn't do anything else very well.

      Abiword reads it better, faster, and w/a smaller footprint.

      Please remove the GWB tag. You don't graduate from Yale if you are stupid.

    22. Re:What? by opie92115 · · Score: 1

      Actually the largest problem I am having with Linux is in configuring. I've gone through 4 distros of Linux now and Mandrake is the easiest I have found as a new user, and its not all that simple to set up. MS office is a nice tool and I personally belive the largest draw for Windows is the quality and quantity of software available for it that doesn't need other software to run it. (On a side not is there a way to update Glibc without reinstalling?)

    23. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Office for Windows reads .doc files just fine.

      What?? Maybe it "reads" .doc files fine, but it does an average to poor job of displaying the contents in a format that resembles what the author intended.

      Spend some time searching Open Office's issues database for ".doc" and decide if it's ready yet. It's a fine word processor in its own document format, but it's BAD at handling MS Office documents.

    24. Re:What? by Mr+Foot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'll probably be modded down for this, but what do you expect from slashdot drones?

    25. Re:What? by siphoncolder · · Score: 1
      Need doesn't make right.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    26. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why?

      Actually, I don't care that I miss your point.

    27. Re:What? by aeoo · · Score: 1

      (I fully expect to be modded down for this, but what the hell. I have karma to burn)

      I am tired of reading this kind of crap. You damn well should be modded down for the tripe you included in parentheses.

      You have something to say? Just say it. Arrrggggg!!!

    28. Re:What? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice on Linux can read .doc files, but it does tend to destroy your formatting...

    29. Re:What? by bluprint · · Score: 1

      I find this type of logic to be...horrifying.

      Somehow, I imagine if they same type of logic were applied to you, say you had some skill that was in very high demand, but only a few people had, and say the government decided you HAD to work, and HAD to accept far lower pay, you might get just a little...shall we say, hypocritical?

      There are word processors available. Choose one. Microsoft should be able to ask what they want, and you should be able to choose to use it or not.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    30. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grep 'expect' 'modded down' | ++mod

      mod parent up!

    31. Re:What? by Selfbain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you don't think GWB is a retard then I have some lovely land in Florida to sell you.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    32. Re:What? by frengold · · Score: 1

      Why don't people just use .RTF format, every word processor reads it and you 99.9% of the original formatting. Refuse to save MS word files in DOC format, use RTF.

    33. Re:What? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Yes, but while they're free, they don't necessarily do the job.

      Actually they get the job done, at least for me last quarter. As a small social experiment I decided to use only open source and non-MS apps for school. I study CS at an all-Microsoft campus so it's a bit more of challenge than it probably sounds.

      Open Office took care of my "office" needs just fine. The doc format didn't crap out on me often and the app itself isn't bad. It could really use some nice 16-bit cutesy icons though.

      Mozilla and other gecko-based browsers took care of all my web stuff. My school is heavily into making use of the web (for better or worse) and I didn't have any problems using Moz even though the sites had huge disclaimers about using non-IE web browsers. Other than pointing out the fact that they weren't sending proper MIME types I got along just fine.

      The stuff works, it may not be as pretty or arguably "user-friendly" (whatever that means when you consider MS's own learning curve), but it will do the job.

      You're right, open source is not the swiss army knife of software, but it is a workable and viable alternative. The biggest problem I see is that there's so little effort evangelizing open source Windows apps compared to Linux.

      I'd be a lot more comfortable if I heard something like "Oh, Open Office runs on Linux too?" more often. Or ever.

    34. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one ever said linux is the end-all-be-all.

      DOC FILES?

      please, not that again....i can't swing a dead cat without hitting software that will open doc files.

      please give it a rest.

      wordperfect
      open office
      koffice
      abiword

      anyway sending someone a doc file is stupid and should be shot.

      if you don't want the formatting to change, or you don't want compatibility problems, send pdf.

      if you want them to be able to use your text, send a fucking txt, rtf or something similar.

      idiots.

    35. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very easy. Run the .doc file though wordpad. It's free and bundled into Winders. Then save it into a format more compadable, like RTF

    36. Re:What? by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      I'm not just talking about file formats. I take issue with the people who claim open source software is always better -- there are many times when it's not. Particularly from a user-experience point of view. (Just as one example, because open source leads to an inconsistent, hodge-podge interface)

      In this case, from what I have seen of both open office and MS office, that MS wins. Plus, the fact that their file-format is the universal standard kinda helps things.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    37. Re:What? by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      I've tried that, applying for CS jobs no less. Not only does some formatting get lost(which is no biggy), but 99% of people will send the damned thing back to you with no idea how to open it, even if you explain it clearly to them.

    38. Re:What? by hsidhu · · Score: 1

      Even though I use Office/Word on ocassion as well as OpenOffice. I just find it much easier to as the documents in the .rtf (Rich Text), I have never had issues where people have not been able to open any document in .rtf format. Just a thought.

    39. Re:What? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Jeez, that's tough. I can't afford a Humvee, so I'd better just steal one. I *need* one to do my job. Either that, or the gov't should force the company to lower their prices so I'm not *forced* to steal one to do my job. What a crock of horseshit. MS should just stop selling in Taiwan altogether.

    40. Re:What? by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      I might not be getting the same picture you are, but every "common user" distro I've installed has been around as difficult as a Win 98 install. And no fuss with installing all of the other programs you need (Winamp, etc.), you have multiple options on the CD with most distros.

      If you're looking for something that's easy to maintain, and don't mind having your computer down for a week, you might consider giving Gentoo (gentoo.org) a try. It is difficult to set up (a good bit of hand-configuration), but the docs are easy to follow (you pretty much just type in what they tell you along with configuring a handful of files). Anyway, once you get it up, that's the payoff. The Portage system is extremely nice. Type "emerge xine-ui xine-dvdnav" and you've got a media player that will play any common video format (DVD included) besides Real. "emerge realone" (I think that's the ebuild name) and you're set the rest of the way.

      As far as system maintenance goes, I seriously think Gentoo has got to be one of the bst. But that's me. =)

      Feel free to email me if you'd like a hand.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    41. Re:What? by br0ck · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about a feature for slashcode where posts can be marked as below, but with no karma involved. A poster could mark his own post, or a moderator could use a mod point. Then in preferences, readers could mark these posts -5.

      +0 Meta comments own comment with I know "I will be modded"
      +0 Requests mod up or down
      +0 Copy and paste of article
      +0 Comment is only a reply to a sig (annoying when sigs are off)
      +0 Suggests a weird useless feature for slashcode

      Another quick thought is that the score on the page is sometimes confusing when you award and demote posts, so how about marking next to it (+3) indicating that your preference setting increased the score of the post by 3. Yes, I know that you can see this when you view the individual posting.

    42. Re:What? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Open Office for Windows reads .doc files just fine in 95-99% cases. And that's the last percent that gets you.

    43. Re:What? by Jondor · · Score: 1

      While linux can have it's problems during setup, it all depends on the hardware. The last time I had to install win2000 on an empty machine (had to format the disks!) it took me 3 days before all the hardware worked. Linux usualy takes me a morning..

      The biggest problem I ever had there was an soundblaster cd-rom which wasn't detected and needed kernel parameters. (half an hour with the RedHat docu). The biggest problem with 2000 was getting a soundcard to work which involved weird things like installing and removing a fixpack. Installing the software and then reinstalling the fixpack. All from an MS knowllegbase article. It took me 3 days finding and fixing.

      Most people who say that windows is easy to install, never tried to do it on unsupported hardware IF they actualy ever DID a clean install.

      But in the end, installing an OS is as easy as the experience of the installer makes it.

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    44. Re:What? by bluprint · · Score: 1

      I don't necessarily agree that Open source solutions are better....but what you are saying is, because MS has developed a superior product, they should be penalized by not being allowed to do what anyone else *is* allowed to do.

      While we're at it, why don't we force Jaguar and Mercedes to start selling their cars for 20k a piece? They are superior after all...

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    45. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to update glibc? It's a very critical library, and messing around with it could be fatal.

      If you HAVE to -- i.e. there's a security hole -- get Mandrake's own updated RPMs for it and:

      # rpm -Fvh glibc-*

      as root. You don't need to reboot.

    46. Re:What? by tshak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Open Office for Windows reads .doc files just fine.

      No it doesn't. Whenever a client sends me a contract in Word I have to ask my roommate to print it for me, because when I print from Open Office I get a bunch of garbage half of the time. I'd pay the ~$300+ (OEM) for MS Office in a heartbeat if it weren't for the security issues.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    47. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, it CAN'T be the "universal standard" by definition if it only works on a few machines (WinPC and Mac). Get real.

      And "hodge-podge" of interfaces? Go check out KDE 3.1 or GNOME 2.2. Much more consitency than Microsoft's Office/IE/WMP differing toolkits and design choices.

      Never mind.

    48. Re:What? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Erm, it CAN'T be the "universal standard" by definition if it only works on a few machines (WinPC and Mac). Get real. "Get real"? Yo'ure the one saying that Windows PCs and Macs only amount to a "few machines". Call me nuts, but I thought that 99+% market share WAS generally considered a "standard".

    49. Re:What? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny
      I found these issues as well, however, I found it did a better job of importing .doc files than different versions of Word did.

      Yeah, but when Word has formatting errors on its own files, those are the official formatting errors. With Open Office, the formatting errors come from some third party.

      I'm sure most people want to experience errors the way they were meant to be, not some lame wannabe errors.

    50. Re:What? by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      You can rename an .RTF to .DOC and Word will still figure out what kind of document it is. Heck, I even tried this with my resume once, which was a .WPD (WordPerfect Document). Word opened it and converted it, but the conversion was terrible, so I never actually distributed the .wpd in disguise that way.

    51. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please remove the GWB tag. You don't graduate from Yale if you are stupid.

      Yeah, being a Bush didn't give him a competitive advantage at all.
    52. Re:What? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There are very few things in Mandrake that are not simple to configure graphically. Of what's left, the vast majority of that would counfound most WinDOS users equally.

      Even the simple stuff ends up being too hard for the less skilled WinDOS users. Just about any task that requires it's own specialized knowledge (no matter how trivial) fits in this category.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    53. Re:What? by HL · · Score: 1

      (I fully expect to be modded down for this, but what the hell. I have karma to burn)

      Why the hell are people who write this automatically modded up!?? Isn't it obvious that they are flamebaits and karma-whores??

      Well, I fully expect to be modded down (in fact I hope so; I'm totally off-topic), but what the hell, I don't have any karma to lose.

      HL == AC

    54. Re:What? by flex0 · · Score: 1
      I've been thinking about a feature for slashcode where posts can be marked as below, but with no karma involved. A poster could mark his own post, or a moderator could use a mod point. Then in preferences, readers could mark these posts -5.
      [...]
      +0 Suggests a weird useless feature for slashcode
      Yea, such a feature would be useful ;)
    55. Re:What? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...you can probably even run it under Wine on your Linux desktop...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    56. Re:What? by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      More to the point -- what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?

      From what I understand MS Word is not nearly as popular in Asia as in America. I think it is Hancom (or something like it) that is the word processor of choice in Asia. As another poster said when given a file in a unreadable format, one tends to complain.

      It is just that in America, it is assumed you SHOULD have MS Word instead of it being OPTIONAL like it really SHOULD BE. Companies in the US should have made it a priority of changing the default save mode in Word to .rtf (which is simple to do) but "Corporate America" is lazy and stupid.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    57. Re:What? by toopc · · Score: 1
      http://www.openoffice.org

      Be serious.

      When trying to promote Open Office, we talk about it's ability to open Microsoft Word documents.

      When trying to slam Microsoft, we talk about how we're forced to use Microsoft Word because their file formats aren't open.

      Everybody knows this.
      We're currently trying to slam Microsoft.
      So get with the program!

    58. Re:What? by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time I checked I could drive a car other than a Jaguar or a Mercedes without trouble. However it appears that in many industries an inability to handle Word documents is not tenable. That is how a monopoly works. The reason monopolies have different rules is because otherwise we would pay thousands of dollars a month for our power and telephone access. The monopoly has no incentive to improve services or reduce prices.

      It may not be fair to the monopoly to require them to adhere to extra regulations but it is less fair to punish everyone else with a stagnation in competition.

    59. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't afford to lose any ground to "open sores." ;P

    60. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll probably get modded down for this but the people who get mod points are usally retarded morons.

    61. Re:What? by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Yes it does.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    62. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems independent, yes. In reality, no. I am talking at the government level, of course.

    63. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been gone for a while, the quickest route to karma nowadays is disparaging OSS in favor of MS. BTW, the answer to your question is OpenOffice, not that I've ever received a .doc at home in 10 years of computer support..

    64. Re:What? by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      So in M$ Office the errors are features, while in staroffice/openoffice/gnumeric and the gang their just bugs.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    65. Re:What? by Smthng · · Score: 1

      PLEASE do NOT do this.

      (I know the above might have been intended as a joke)

      Even if you have enough power over the person sending the .doc file to enforce it - Just don't do it.

      It comes off as childish and frivolous and gives Free software and its supporters a bad rep.

      (Unless your initials are RMS in which case ppl expect it from you anyway)

    66. Re:What? by flacco · · Score: 1
      More to the point -- what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?

      Open them in OpenOffice?

      Or better, send them back with the URL for OpenOffice, tell the sender to download it for free, convert the document to native OpenOffice format, and send you that copy?

      What? Are you saying the receiver of a .DOC file should be obligated to spend a wad of cash just to read your proprietary format documents? I don't think so.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    67. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do it. I explain why I'm doing it (price, risk of infections, anti-privacy features - that's anti-privacy, not anti-piracy). The poster said complain, but it doesn't have to be a complaint, just a request to resend in an open format. Most people understand and will re-send in an open format. Some may slip up and send in a proprietary format again the next time they send a file. I send another reminder. Most people don't need more than 2 or 3 reminders. Some will start saving in a format like RTF by default. Very few will object to saving to an open format. When they do, the common reason is that they don't know how and don't want to learn how.

    68. Re:What? by flacco · · Score: 1
      As a small social experiment I decided to use only open source and non-MS apps for school. I study CS at an all-Microsoft campus so it's a bit more of challenge than it probably sounds.

      Cheers to you!

      But I'm honestly flabbergasted whenever I hear that a CS department is "MS-only". It's simply, utterly, completely perplexing.

      What are these schools??

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    69. Re:What? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      reads doc files ....90%....
      thats my experiance...some small formatting problems in most docs
      some large fomating problems in others.
      but hey Importing tends to work better than exporting.

      but thats ok I save in HTML

      HAzzaaa ...for standards....now if the W3c would get off there as and make a binary standard I would be a happy man....(pics don't move with the html file)

      --
      --meh--
    70. Re:What? by stormraven · · Score: 1

      It's the FUN things I miss on Linux. There are so many games and it's a terrible pain in the ass to get them ALL running on Linux because most run on Windows only. Granted, there are ways, but most is an utter pain in the ass. Oh and being a starving college student, I cannot even afford apps I am REQUIRED to have for my classes. All-M$ campus and all. UTTER pain in the ass. Visual Basic 6, Microsoft Frontpage, M$ Office, and other such as that. I simply don't have the money, and if I had to spend all that time in the computer lab at school I'd never get home. What I want to see is Linux run - reliably and easily - all the Windows-based programs I know and love (Non-M$ made), as well as all the ones I know and hate(M$ crap). What I'd also like to see is the average loser in the computer lab be sent to gay blue M$ hell. "It says to start Notepad. How do I do that?"

    71. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, as opposed to the US then... lol.

    72. Re:What? by Gorgonzola · · Score: 1
      --
      -- Spelling and grammar errors tend to be a sign of erroneous thinking.
    73. Re:What? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >What are these schools??

      A lot of schools sign Microsoft Campus-wide agreements for deep-discounts. You can pretty much run into any CS professor and hear a groan when you mention unix because they don't like the MS agreements much either.

  6. Refund, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this like mexico and pills, they sell it cheaper there cause you cant pay the full price?

    Kind of sucks...

    1. Re:Refund, by etcpasswd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Price is relative to the country you live in. "Eastern Economy Editions" of many technical books are a good example of this. Many can't afford the books if you sell them at the same price as USD. (Sure, the paper quality is low, but that's beside the point - if you want people to buy, better make it affordable).

  7. WAR3Z by jrmann1999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, how long till we see a warez scene release of the microsoft source code? I mean isn't taiwan one of the worst countries for piracy there is?

    1. Re:WAR3Z by Evil-G · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Possibly, but I have a feeling that microsoft would probably remove all comments from their source code and make the variable names all meaningless. Then it would be nigh on impossible to understand how windows works.

      I don't say this because i think they're evil, but it's common sense for them if what you suggest might happen did happen. Their source code is a close secret, and I dont think they would even want a government of any country to see it.

    2. Re:WAR3Z by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Implying that's not the case already?

    3. Re:WAR3Z by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The source code is pretty much useless.

      Think about it. 50 million lines of code. If you were to read 1 line per second, 8 hours a day, 6 days a week, year-round, it would take you 5-1/2 years just to read it all!

      Then you'd have to understand it.

      By then it would be obsolete, anyway, because it would be 1 or 2 generations behind.

      If you've ever gone through even a 5,000 page program, you know that just getting yourself oriented to that you know where to look takes TIME.

      Back in the '80s Microsoft was in the habit of screwing up/obfuscating the symbol tables on the software they released - until the courts made them stop that practice.

    4. Re:WAR3Z by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can see most of it (I think some security stuff or something like that is out), but you can't compile it to obtain again i.e. Windows XP afaik. Even if someone gets that source code, and even if its not traceable to the licensee that obtained it, for what it will be useful?

      Worst than that, if you develop something barely based in a shared source licensed code, Microsoft not only will sue you, but also will own anything you did with it for their own profit. I would run away from that kind of sources, and fast.

      Instead of this, you have all kind of sources in open source license, a lot with BSD if you are scared by MS anti-GPL propaganda, if you want quality (?) working sources for complex tasks.

      Of course, if windows XP sources are distributed by some war3z group, we will see how a security by obscurity system stand against a bit of light on it.

    5. Re:WAR3Z by jgerman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ok if it's 50 million lines of code, then it won't be obsolete, it will still be in the product one or two generations later. If it's not 50 million lines it's digestible, and understandable.


      That wrong being righted aside, the soure is certainly not useless, and it wouldn't take a huge amount of effort to de-obfuscate and domcument the code. A sourceforge project with a handful of bright peopel could do it relatively easily.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    6. Re:WAR3Z by Soko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Possibly, but I have a feeling that microsoft would probably remove all comments from their source code and make the variable names all meaningless.

      I don't think so - there is the Shared Source initiative from Microsoft. Obuscation of the code would be unprofessional at best.

      Then it would be nigh on impossible to understand how windows works.

      With all of the code profilers and debuggers out there, obuscation would only be a temporary set back. (*Avoids cheap shot about the average Windows user*)

      I don't say this because i think they're evil, but it's common sense for them if what you suggest might happen did happen. Their source code is a close secret, and I dont think they would even want a government of any country to see it.

      I also don't think that MS is "evil", but I disagree with the rest of your statement. Along with your Shared Source agreement comes an NDA. In that NDA (AFAIK), you state that you won't use the source to make your own version of Windows, nor will you help the competition in any way, which does make perect sense from a business perspective.

      However, seeing that Linux and a lot of other OSS is in direct competition with Microsoft, they've basically removed you from developing OSS. Why wouldn't they want a government to be legally bound to not develop OSS? That's part of the strategic fall out from Shared Source - stealing mindshare through NDAs.

      Using a WAR3Zed copy of the Windows source code to "help" an OSS project would be even worse, since you would have used illegally obtained IP and polluted the code, giving Microsoft both legal and moral ground to kill the project you contributed to.

      Please, stay away from Windows source code, unless you have no desire or need to contribute to OSS.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    7. Re:WAR3Z by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Most Windows code already has meaningless variablenames, since they insist on using that Hungarian crap. You know, the one where every integer variable has a little 'i' prefix to help you remember what it was. I guess it all looks like

      for(int iI = 0; iI <; iLimit < iI++)

      { ... }

      or something. The strings are all "pszString" or some such, for "pointer to string, zero-terminated". Isn't it handy to have all this really useful information available in every variable name?

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    8. Re:WAR3Z by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      In one sense, you're right. There's still code from DOS 5.0 in Win2k, for example. The only problem is that, even if it's still in later generations of code, when you get those 'later generations', you're still stuck w. the size of it. Like I said, just taking a second a line would take you 6 years just to read it.

    9. Re:WAR3Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Possibly, but I have a feeling that microsoft would probably remove all comments from their source code and make the variable names all meaningless. Then it would be nigh on impossible to understand how windows works."

      Really?

      So, how is it that I don't have a job when I can understand what a program does just by looking at the source, sans comments and stupid notational ideas about variable names?

      Don't get me wrong - comments and sane variable names are a good thing. But if you can't understand code without them, you're in the wrong field.

    10. Re:WAR3Z by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Back in the '80s Microsoft was in the habit of screwing up/obfuscating the symbol tables on the software they released - until the courts made them stop that practice.

      References?

      Oh, and the reason they stopped is because it was too easy to screw up the ordinal way of loading functions when you released updated DLLs unless you were EXTREMELY careful -- even if it was an order of magnitude faster to do the lookup. Much more flexible to lookup by name.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    11. Re:WAR3Z by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Way back in an old programming mag from the late '80's, since tossed in the trashbin along w. over 1000 other mags from that era.

    12. Re:WAR3Z by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      Back in the '80s Microsoft was in the habit of screwing up/obfuscating the symbol tables on the software they released - until the courts made them stop that practice.

      Now, instead of obfuscating at the compiled level, they obfuscate at the source level instead?

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    13. Re:WAR3Z by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
      I don't think so - there is the Shared Source initiative from Microsoft. Obuscation of the code would be unprofessional at best.


      Redundant too. This is C and C++ code we're talking about.
  8. High cost of software by ferrous+oxide · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Seems the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need."


    Gee, this sounds awfully familiar. Not a problem unique to Taiwan. I wonder if (and hope) it will ultimately have implications for the US market.

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:High cost of software by Un1v4c · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course...

      "In other news, Microsoft announced it will be raising the price of Office XP approximately 26.7 percent in the US."

      --

      I gave myself to Jesus, but now he never calls
    2. Re:High cost of software by brkello · · Score: 1

      Gee, this sounds awfully familiar

      I agree. If we could get the RIAA to lower cd prices to something reasonable for similar reasons, there would be less of an excuse to download them. I also like applying the idea of debundling software packages to cds. That way we can pay 1/14th (fraction made up) the price for the songs we actually want to listen to. Note this all started with the government cracking down on piracy. Would it take a similar crack down here in the US before people start complaining enough to get cds to reasonable prices?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:High cost of software by unicron · · Score: 1

      Piracy/bootlegging/theft of CD's and software was never about rights or laws or morals or fair use, at least not for me. I did it because their were things I would've much rather spend my money on. It was what is was, but it was honest.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:High cost of software by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Off-topic - I like your sig, I was wondering where that came from. I got it in a fortune cookie one time. A real fortune cookie at a chinese restaurant. it's kind of paraphrased, though..

      "Do not be afraid of computers. Be afraid of the lack of them."

    5. Re:High cost of software by ferrous+oxide · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I mean...I have absolutely no problem paying artists for their music, programmers for their code, etc. But. When I feel (and I do) like 99% the 17$ I spend on a music cd is going directly into the pockets of an evil record company, it's hard to justify paying it. I don't have the money to burn, and if my favorite band is only going to get about a dime...

      --
      "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  9. Hopefully by moc.tfosorcimgllib · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully after they see the positive effect this has on the consumer, they will start to do the same elsewhere.

    I am serious.

    No really, I'm being serious.

    1. Re:Hopefully by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1
      The consumers over there won't be happy until and unless they can have Microsoft products for free. Why in the world would they pay for it when it is so easy to pirate it, regardless of the price.

      --sex

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    2. Re:Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno ... maybe they have morals?

  10. No competition. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Even at the newly reduces MS pricing, Microsoft can't compete in the Taiwanese market. Pirated MS discs can be had on almost any street corner for a dollar a disc.

    1. Re:No competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that sounds like a fair price for it in the USA too

    2. Re:No competition. by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Taiwanese government is making a strong effort to crack down on the pirates. You can't find them on every street corner in Taiwan. And they actually cost about NT$100(~$3 US) a disc.

  11. didnt MS say that by k3v0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    breaking up windows would destroy the OS when the antitrust suit was on?

    1. Re:didnt MS say that by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      breaking up windows would destroy the OS when the antitrust suit was on?

      Their arguement was about taking IE out of Windows. The article talks about breaking up OfficeXP into individual packages, WordXP and ExcelXP, so you aren't forced to buy the entire Office suite.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  12. Visual Studio .NET by Hellraisr · · Score: 1

    I really wish they'd relax on the pricings of Visual Studio.. they should know that students cannot afford to purchase it. I mean, they do have the Student Edition but when you go into the workforce, they're going to have the Enterprise Architect Edition.

    Development tools should be free to students. It would ensure that people would have the skills to use the tools as they become available

    1. Re:Visual Studio .NET by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't matter right now anyway - as there are no jobs available for when you graduate.

      I would look somewhere other than programming to spend your education dollars.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

      Development tools should be free to students.

      At the bigger universities, they usually are (or damn cheap). I purchased OfficeXP Pro. for $10, Windows XP pro. for $10, and VS.Net for $30. Our school also has a license to loan out disks (free of charge) for VS6.

    3. Re:Visual Studio .NET by be-fan · · Score: 1

      A better compiler*, with source code, free. What more do you want?

      *> Before anybody tries to reply, check out Boost's compiler status pages. Visual C++ 7.0 has 58 failures the EDG-based Intel C++ 7.0 has 43 failures, and GCC 3.2.1, has only 16!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Visual Studio .NET by (1337)+God · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do!

      Before you pluck down a few hundred dollars for the latest edition of Visual Studio, please be sure to stop by your computer science faculty office and see if they have discounted Microsoft licensing deals.

      My school has so many alumni working at Microsoft that anyone and everyone taking CS classes at the university can obtain Windows 2000 and Visual Studio .NET for free.

      Join The (1337) Clan If You Have What It Takes!

      --

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    5. Re:Visual Studio .NET by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are a student, you have no real _need_ of the enterprise architect version. Sure, it might be nice to poke around and play with BUT, that's not what you should be learning in school. VS.NET is just a tool and nothing more, the only reason you need it at all is as an environment to implement the coding techniques you are being taught. (If you're being taught VS.NET explicitly rather than a language, or even better, general programming paradigms(sp?) and methods, you may want to rethink where you are going to school;-)

      Besides, with the release of .NET, MS has actually made it so that you have absolutely NO need of VS.net, since by downloading the sdk, you can write code in notepad and compile etc from the tools provided for _free_.

      VS.NET is a convenience tool and nothing more, and as such MS does deserve to be paid for it without a doubt. Go compare other professional IDE's at the street price, you'll realize that even then VS.NET is a great deal. You should be happy as a student that there IS a cheaper version provided for something that is just a tool.

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're going to into the programming field and your biggest concern is that you aren't going to be ready for some extra plugins in Visual Studio?

      Hehehe

    7. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Development tools should be free to students

      At my Uni they have WinXP-Home, VS.net and OfficeXP for free to students. You can check out the software and install it at home then return the CD's.

      Is this common at many Uni's, or maybe it was just an incentive for the Uni to purchase XP-Pro and OfficeXP for every machine on campus??

    8. Re:Visual Studio .NET by bm_luethke · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have to disagree, come to Knoxville, Tennessee. We have a shortage of programmers. Go to smaller areas of Tennessee and you will find the same, most likely any of the millions of acres of realativly rural America also has this problem. You will make in the low 30's (average salary is about 16-18 so it's good money for here). Sure your not in the center of tech, you don't have a large city, and you will be surrounded by rednecks. But you will have a house, food, and a few toys (jetskis, cars, computers - you can afford some decent ones). Heck, you may find that you actually like living in slower rural areas.

      More properly you can't find a job in the places you want to live - there are plenty if you are willing to go anywhere. Nor will you make "big bucks" - you will make more than a large portion of our population though.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    9. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I keep hearing this, and can only assume that you're salary expectations are too high (I dont care what the DeVry commercials say, you aint starting at 80 grand), your skillsets are too limited, or you just aren't looking hard enough.

    10. Re:Visual Studio .NET by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      I mean, they do have the Student Edition but when you go into the workforce, they're going to have the Enterprise Architect Edition.

      I bought the standard version of VS.net, not even the student one to learn with. Stupid POS will only let you connect to Access and MSDE data sources. If you try to connect to any others, it gives you this wonderful little message about how you aren't licensed to connect to anything other than Access or MSDE. That REALLY pissed me off when I got that.

      So what did I do about it? I did what most people would have done... I went to Kazaa Lite and downloaded the Enterprise Architect version.

    11. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless of course you *are* a programmer (as opposed to a generalized career sheeple who is seeking the greenest cash pasture) and are interested in pursuing a college education to further extend knowledge in the field you have a passion for.

    12. Re:Visual Studio .NET by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am a student, and MS are giving my university a license for VS.NET for every student on their home machines. So that I can play with it while they finalise the details, MS just gave me a free copy of the latest beta. It crashes during the pre-requisite install phase (before the main installer kicks in). Looks like I'll be staying with gcc + vim then...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Go compare other professional IDE's at the street price, you'll realize that even then VS.NET is a great deal.

      I can't comment on the price of VS.NET, but I can comment on the price of professional Java IDEs.

      At my company, we use JBuilder Enterprise 7, which cost us about £1500 each as an upgrade from JB4 Pro (our previous IDE). We also have a single floating licence for TogetherJ's Control Centre, purchased a few years ago, which cost us about £10k. JProbe, a Java profiling tool, cost us something in that region.

      They are all nothing, though.

      LoadRunner, a Windows-based loadtesting suite, cost us a rumoured £45k about 3 years ago. I have no doubt that other "specialist" software is far more expensive.

      So, yes, commercial IDEs are damn expensive - but compared to some software, they're effectively free.

      Also, you have to consider this - they are aimed primarly at buisiness (especially any edition with "Professional", "Enterprise" or "Architect" in the title). For a business, if it saves each staff member a day or two's worth of time over its entire lifetime, it will have paid for itself. At the rate I'm usually charged out to clients at, my JB7 Enterprise cost my company about 1.5 day's worth of my time. It's saved me more than that, so it was money well spent.

    14. Re:Visual Studio .NET by xtal · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter right now anyway - as there are no jobs available for when you graduate.

      First, you don't need MS -anything- to program. I question the intelligence of anyone expending effort to join a commoditized programming community. Those easy tools mean you are expendible in a big way. Programming has nothing to do with a particular environment. Learn to solve problems. This is the largest problem I see when working with new people. Programming is implmenting a specific set of instructions to accomplish a task. No more, no less. The task and the instructions vary.

      Second, if there's too much competition in a field, then move laterally to avoid much heartache.

      If you want to remain employed forever, learn to do embedded programming and be willing to move around. If you can do the following, you can find work. Move the hell out of big cities. How much money do you have left after you pay for rent and transportation, parking, etc? I can buy a HOUSE with LAND (hint: Land != Lot) for $70,000cdn. If I just want a house, I can get a nice one for $40k cdn. I sure as hootin don't live in Toronto.

      Know how to work an oscilloscope and a logic analyser, know what a function generator is used for, pick up a half dozen embedded architectures.. no, hell, even two - and learn what control systems do. Or even what a PID loop does.

      You can program until you're blue in the face then. For money.

      --
      ..don't panic
    15. Re:Visual Studio .NET by flacco · · Score: 1
      So what did I do about it? I did what most people would have done... I went to Kazaa Lite and downloaded the Enterprise Architect version.

      Whereas what you should have done is wised up, thrown that proprietary ass-sucking shitbag of a development environment into the trash, and discovered the world of open source development tools.

      Switching is not that bad. Really. Even a retard like me can do it. And that's saying something.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    16. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Kombat · · Score: 1
      Whereas what you should have done is wised up, thrown that proprietary ass-sucking shitbag of a development environment into the trash, and discovered the world of open source development tools.

      Switching is not that bad.

      Clearly, you've never used .NET. There are no open-source tools that allow you to accomplish the same breadth of tasks, with the ease and speed of VS.NET. MONO is on the right track, but is way, way behind.

      I use VS.NET at work and was very surprised to learn just how easy it is to do certain things. If you're using Microsoft products from front-to-back, then whipping up an interactive web app with Windows authentication, backing on a very fast and reliable SQL database can be accomplished literally within a few minutes. It's really quite something, when you see it the first time.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    17. Re:Visual Studio .NET by flacco · · Score: 1
      Me: proprietary ass-sucking shitbag

      You: If you're using Microsoft products from front-to-back

      It's really the proprietary part that gets me.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    18. Re:Visual Studio .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a student at ETSU, and they have an agreement with microsoft called the MSDNAA. It says that if you are a Computer Science major enrolled in a class that requires microsoft software (other than office), then you can get it for free by having your instructor sign a form. That applies to Windows XP, Windows 2000 server, Visual Studio .net, etc.
      I'm not trying to SPAM you guys, but any college students reading this should check and see if your school has (or is considering) a similar program.

  13. 'bout time someone started fighting back by Kethinov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not just MS, but software making companies all over the world charge way too much money for software. The number one reason there's so much pirating is because software simply costs too much. But reduced prices or not, I'll still favor Open Source over anything else.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by Stonehand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shareware gets pirated en masse as well. How many people actually register their copy of WinZip? The reason software copyrights get infringed is because it's trivial to do, usually, and the likelihood of getting caught is extremely low. Luxury cars, Armani suits and "collectable" card games are all vastly overpriced, but most people don't bother stealing them because they're intrinsically harder to steal without consequence.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by gordie · · Score: 1

      I did, back at version 2.0, the registration number I recieved is still working today, but I purchased newer releases anyway as time went by. I support the products that work well and give me value for my dollars. WinZip is a great example of that kind of product. It is also the reason why I donate to Open Source projects, now that I have migrated away from the MS world to Linux! I don't have too, but feel it's the right thing to do!

    3. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Bad example.

      winzip simply isn't worth paying for. It's a trivial gui slapped on top of functionality from a 15 year old commandline utility.

      If people couldn't "pirate" winzip, they would simply download another freeware alternative.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There's a lot more to Winzip than you're making out.

      Winzip has 'drag and drop' functionality that allows you to drop file icons into it. It has Windows Explorer integration so one can right click on a directory and turn it into a zipfile.

      Granted, I've not paid for my copy. I once insisted on an employer registering my copy at work, but for home use I used a keygen years ago to generate a Serial Number and have it memorized.

    5. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm... i paid for mIRC... i could afford it and i thought it was a great program. (i speak past tense because i use linux exclusively now and dont want to run mIRC in wine) not everyone in the world is a freeloader.

    6. Re:'bout time someone started fighting back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drag and drop is quite trivial to implement.

      Explorer intergration, as far as I know, is just a matter of adding a couple of registry keys.

      The rest is just a GUI wrapped around an old library. You basically just proved his point.

  14. Similar situation... by Yoda2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was once forced by pirates to use Microsoft software. Will that get me any sort of discount?

    1. Re:Similar situation... by gnuadam · · Score: 1

      Did you work for enron too?

      --
      You say :wq, I say ZZ. Why can't we all just get along?
    2. Re:Similar situation... by asparagus · · Score: 1

      Arrgh, Indonesia b33s a hard place.

      But iffen youzen a talkin aboot s0ftw4r3 p1r4cy, then y0u b33s a scurvy d0g whoze a gonna b3 4ced t0 w4lk d3 pl4nk!

      Aargh! (Different spelling, totally different pronunciation/meaning, for the record.)

    3. Re:Similar situation... by (1337)+God · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was once forced by pirates to use Microsoft software. Will that get me any sort of discount?

      Only in Soviet Russia.

      Join The (1337) Clan If You Have What It Takes!

      --

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    4. Re:Similar situation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Discount gets you!

    5. Re:Similar situation... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Russia of today is _nothing_ like the cold-war Russia propaganda that many have come to see as the norm. Every Russian (and Georgian) that I've met (here in the US) is extremely hard-working and good-hearted.

      I've never even been to Russia, but I really think that the cold-war Russian image is obsolete and we should give it a rest.

      If I'm not mistaken, Russia is one of the fastest growing technology countries.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    6. Re:Similar situation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if I'm not mistaken, you completely missed the joke.

  15. Possible? by grub · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Assuming the software in Taiwan is a lot cheaper than in North America and Europe, what's to stop someone from buy^H^H^Hlicensing MS' software in Taiwan and using it here? Do the licenses actually have clauses against that?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shure you can... if you do not mind to use your windows in Chinese. There is no happy language swapping in windoze. You buy chinese windoze box, you stick to chinese - you can not install an english version from a friend.

    2. Re:Possible? by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      It's simple. Release only a Chinese-Language version in Taiwan.

    3. Re:Possible? by murphyslawyer · · Score: 1
      Typically, yes. The software liscense is valid only in the country of sale, and in fact it may be illegal to take it to another country.

      While working as a sysadmin, one of my sheep was going to take a position with the company overseas for about a year. Since the length of stay required a work visa instead of a regular tourist visa, there was some weirdness. Since she of course wanted to take her laptop with Win2k on it with her, we asked a customs official if this was okay. After about 2 weeks of internal arguing, a US Customs official in DC contacted us and told us that the laptop could not be shipped overseas with Windows installed on it, and likewise could not be shipped back. And this was to Germany, a country we are supposedly friendly with. We were forced to purchase a German copy of Windows, in Germany, and have the vendor install it on the laptop.

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
    4. Re:Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can read things in Chineese, not a lot. However, you will probably prefer to have Windows in a European language.

    5. Re:Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that is because of US rules on im/export of strong encryption, rather than for licensing rules.

  16. FIRST BOAST!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft Taiwan's concrete action to lower prices of Microsoft products is exactly in line with the Fair Trade Commission's goals of maintaining orderly trade, consumer benefits, fair competition and economic prosperity,"

    Actually, if people were buying pirated software in huge quantities, maybe MS decided that SOME profit is better than none.

  17. Not just Taiwan by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost

    This is a problem most people under 24 seem to have...

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Not just Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      They have no problems finding some dough for beer, pizza, cigarettes or pot.

    2. Re:Not just Taiwan by lavalyn · · Score: 1
      And who do you think do all these upgrades anyway?

      The entire bleeding edge is based on hard-core gamers. Why in the world would big business go buy a few hundred l33t GeForce4s or "upgrade" to an untested unknown program that breaks all backward compatibility?

      --
      Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    3. Re:Not just Taiwan by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      All of those things can be bought singly or together, in varying quantities, for no more than a couple of dozen dollars/pounds/insert local currency here.

      Now go see how much Word, XP, etc cost. They're a *different order of magnitude* in price.

      I'm 28, own a house and a car, have a family, have a very well paid job, and *I* can't afford MS Office. Hell, I can't afford Visual C#.NET, which costs about 1/7th as much.

    4. Re:Not just Taiwan by Threni · · Score: 1

      "I'm 28, own a house and a car, have a family, have a very well paid job, and *I* can't afford MS Office. Hell, I can't afford Visual C#.NET, which costs about 1/7th as much."

      And yet here is Microsoft - forcing you to buy their products. One can only guess at what might happen if you didn't buy them. I mean, I heard they were evil, but really!

    5. Re:Not just Taiwan by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Part of the reasont that Microsoft caved is that Taiwan has been making overtures to a switch to Linux. Microsoft knows that if the government switches to Linux they will also switch to some other office suite. If the Taiwanese government switches to a new office suite, then everyone that does business with the Taiwanese government will also have to switch.

      The government probably doesn't want to switch, but they have to at least appear as if they are stomping out piracy or they get in trouble with the WTO. So Microsoft is lowering the price of MS Office in Taiwan so that they don't lose you folks as customers.

    6. Re:Not just Taiwan by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
      I'm 28, own a house and a car, have a family, have a very well paid job, and *I* can't afford MS Office.

      Geez, ya bozo, no wonder you can't afford Microsoft -- you're economic priorities are all out of whack. Ditch the family, then run -- don't walk -- right down and pick up that retail copy of Office XP Pro you know you've been hankerin' for. You'll be glad you did.

      Lee Kaiwen,
      Taiwan, ROC

    7. Re:Not just Taiwan by flacco · · Score: 1
      I'm 28, own a house and a car, have a family, have a very well paid job, and *I* can't afford MS Office. Hell, I can't afford Visual C#.NET, which costs about 1/7th as much.

      Spend less money on crack?

      But then again, that's the only thing that would make you consider C#.NET anyway, so it's a wash.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    8. Re:Not just Taiwan by lysium · · Score: 1

      Big business is not pleased with that little ploy, either. The current apple models cannot be downgraded from OSX, period. I know of a few large companies that are going out of their way to purchase old stock and refurbished machines.

      Vendor games are stupid, especially so.....(once again) in a recession.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  18. Sharing source code by snack-a-lot · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it'll be before the source code to Windows et al gets in the hands of the wares groups. With Microsoft sharing it with countries like Taiwan and Russia - which aren't exactly under the thumb of the US Government like the UK is - I reckon it won't be long.

    1. Re:Sharing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already get the win2k source off kazaa and winmx, if you know what to search for ("win2k source code" ain't going to get you anything, put it that way.) It got leaked a few months ago.

    2. Re:Sharing source code by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe Ballmer was stupid enough to turn over source code to the Russian government! People who know or have had any dealings with Russian red-tape knows that Russian mob make the Yakuza look like a Brownie scouts. They are part and parcel of the government there. I give it 6 months, tops, before windows source is all over the warez croud. These guys will make sure it gets there just to screw with MS.

  19. Yeah .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but let's face it .. the alternatives suck.
    actions speak louder than words.

  20. So ... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do i do ?
    Bash Mircosoft ?
    Praise Taiwan ?
    Hail Linux ? (oops ... GNU/Linux )
    Seriously, I miss those days when slashdot's M$ stories were like ....Windows XP kills your kids, go with linux
    So easy to pick a side, now with these ambiguous stories, I don't know which side i am on.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:So ... by Broodje · · Score: 2
      I agree. I was skimming through the first few posts and wondering what I could add to the discussion. Here is what I see in this 5min old thread:
      • racism
      • disinformation
      • piracy
      • free alternatives
      Same old stuff, wait 30mins, set filter to 1, mine the gems yourself :) -broodje
    2. Re:So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go with whichever side hates the French.

      Unless it's both sides - then toss a coin.

    3. Re:So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to see those things, just do what I do: Browse at -1.

    4. Re:So ... by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
      Go with whichever side hates the French.

      Umm, that would be just about everybody. But it's OK, 'cause the French don't much like anybody, either.

      Lee Kaiwen,
      Taiwan, ROC

      Disclaimer -- the aforementioned comments are intended for comedic purposes only. Other uses prohibited. Slashdot moderators, YMMV.

  21. but... by tx_mgm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ....i thought it was integrated and couldnt be sold seperately??? wasnt that part of their argument at the monopoly trials? if they can break it up into components for those guys, why the HELL can't they do it for us here in the states? seems unfair to me...i dont want to pay hundreds of dollars for an operating system that is only nessessary for games, yet here i am...

    --
    Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
    -Dr. Weird
    1. Re:but... by skeedlelee · · Score: 1

      According to the article (which is really short)

      Sounds like it ~26% off, so the OS is still hundreds of dollars. Also, they're going sell the bits of Office separately, not Windows. You can already get Office in pieces here if I recall.

      Kinda pointless really.

      Shae

    2. Re:but... by NathanBales · · Score: 1

      The "integrated features" from the trial were windows componants if my memory serves. Among them were Internet Explorer (which is quite nicely integrated), Media Player and Windows Messenger.

  22. Hooray! by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're still not paying for Windows, though.

    DarklordJonnyDigital, officially surfing on Debian ;)

    1. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still not paying for Windows, either.

      Anonymous Coward, officially surfing on Windows XP ;)

      *thank you smart russian hackers/crackers

    2. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I payed for Win95 back in 1996. Win95 was completley defective and didn't work *at all*. Hourly lockups, blah blah, you all remember win95. Why is it that with software you're just out of luck? If it was a car I could sue under various lemon laws, if it was a product I could return it. I consider my non-licensed copy of Win2k as my recourse for being sold a defective product.

  23. Forced ... to illegal copies!? by ShelfWare · · Score: 1
    Consumers said they had been forced to turn to illegal copies because Microsoft had used its virtual monopoly to inflate prices.

    Like a 26% reduction in price is going to stop people from pirating it. They are just going to buy more blanks with the extra cash!

  24. weren't pirates supposed to be rich? by Mard · · Score: 1

    Yes.... the high prices are the reason I was forced to pirate Winxp! Or maybe I just don't like the idea of making the richest people in the world richer, for an upgrade to something I already payed for.

    --
    DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    1. Re:weren't pirates supposed to be rich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one FORCED you to pirate anything. The fact that you can't afford something is no excuse to break the law.

    2. Re:weren't pirates supposed to be rich? by Infamous+Tim · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what you may or may not feel you own, you are not entitled to a free copy because of "extenuating circumstances." You are paying for an upgrade that is completely different from what you were previously using. This is especially true of a move from Windows 2k/Me to XP, which is a huge change in a whole bunch of features.
      Think of it this way. Let's say you bought a Honda Accord in 1999. Now you see these new generations of Accords that are coming out, and you want one, you just gotta have one. However, the dealership isn't just going to give you an upgrade to the new Honda just because you bought from them previously. If you were leasing (read as: licensing) your first Accord, chances are your lease for the newer Accord will be higher because of the more advanced features and whatnot. Same thing here.
      And please don't try the tack of "making rich people richer" either. They are rich because they worked hard for it, whether or not you agree with their business practices. Bill Gates is not entitled to hand you a $200 check just because you are poor and he is not. What rubbish! What on earth are they indoctrinating kids with these days?

      I didn't move to Linux because it was cheap, but now that I use it, I find the TCO of my box is very pleasing.

      --
      checking for libvirus... no
      ERROR, libvirus.so not found, terminating
    3. Re:weren't pirates supposed to be rich? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Now you see these new generations of Accords that are coming out, and you want one, you just gotta have one. However, the dealership isn't just going to give you an upgrade to the new Honda just because you bought from them previously. If you were leasing (read as: licensing) your first Accord, chances are your lease for the newer Accord will be higher because of the more advanced features and whatnot.

      No problem, but in the case of pirating to upgrade, the upgrade would consist of him walking into a dealership, photocopying the repair manual that explains the sizes of all the parts, and fabricating his own upgraded parts at home, just as he obtained the raw data that is applied to the disc he purchased blank and fabricated at home for a pirated windows upgrade.

      It certainly would not consist of leaving his old car there and driving out with a new one for free (not that you said this!). That's the equivalent of shoplifting, an entirely different crime with a _much_ lighter sentence.

      [ Yes, boys and girls, if your government puts the smack down on individual piracy, and your morals are lax, you're actually much better off to steal a copy of windows/etc from the shelves of your local computer shop than to pirate it, from a legal liability standpoint. One is a misdemeanor, the other a felony. ] BTW, IANAL.

      >Bill Gates is not entitled to hand you a $200 check just because you are poor and he is not. What rubbish!

      Agreed.

      >What on earth are they indoctrinating kids with these days?

      That criminals have to repay society. Microsoft is a criminally run orgnazation, and they need to repay their debt to society properly, rather than by buying themselves out of the problem. Sometimes I'd rather Bill Gates keep his money if he were forced to spend a year or two in jail for the crimes he willingly let his company commit. Seems like the fair way to punish the man who already has everything, anyways.

      Tasting a bit of the inside might turn him around from the selfish man he is (Don't point me to the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. It's far too little, far too late, and it smacks of a PR front.)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  25. Boohoo by MrWa · · Score: 5, Funny
    Things are expensive. It definitely would be nice to buy Windows by the piece instead of all at once. I can see it now:
    Yes...I would like the Windows operating system, without the remote exploits and BSOD bugs. Also, add in Media Player but not the consumer activity record keeping feature - I dont' really need that.
    As for Office: yes, please include a copy Powerpoint, Excel, and Outlook (without the automatic emailing to all my address book entries feature.)
    Thank you.
    1. Re:Boohoo by el_gregorio · · Score: 0
      How about buying just one "Window"?

      "Windows? No, thanks, I'll just take one. I don't need to multitask."

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
    2. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone ever told you that you are not funny.

      Cause... you ain't funny.

  26. Forced to buy pirated copies? Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that can not be serious. How were they forced to buy pirated copies of MS products? I guess a computer is now a necessity to live.

    Why couldn't they use Linux or some other OSS/FS os?

    1. Re:Forced to buy pirated copies? Come on by NathanBales · · Score: 5, Funny

      Basic survival necessities: Food Water Windows Shelter Slashdot

    2. Re:Forced to buy pirated copies? Come on by istartedi · · Score: 1

      You bastard! Why did you leave out clothing? That forced me to picture a naked slashdotter eating and drinking while reading /. on a Windows PC in their home.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Forced to buy pirated copies? Come on by flacco · · Score: 1
      You bastard! Why did you leave out clothing? That forced me to picture a naked slashdotter eating and drinking while reading /. on a Windows PC in their home.

      *whew*

      Until you said "Windows", I thought you were staring through my fucking patio window.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    4. Re:Forced to buy pirated copies? Come on by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that _buying_ pirated software is kind of stupid.

      --
      blah
  27. Wait a minute by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will also share its Windows source code as part of its Government Security Program, which allows governments to adapt the software and test its ability to fend off hackers.

    So not only are they sharing the source code, they're allowing the Taiwanese governemt to make changes!
    Why don't I believe this.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      If it allows Microsoft to disavow any support for the modified versions (big if; I don't know the terms of such an arrangement) it could save them a considerable amount of money while getting sales they might not otherwise get.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Wait a minute by bigmase521 · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't believe it said anywhere in the article that the Taiwanese Gov't is allowed to make changes. They can see the code, and research/audit it for bugs, and hack exploits. No where does it say MS software is now GPL'd, allowing the gov't free use of the code, where they can modify the source code and make their own operating system based on that code.

      Unless i missed the section that said they are allowed to create TaiWandows out of it, feel free to read on.

      --
      "I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it's going to begin"
  28. And Entourage-only Mac-side... by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is related to their recent decision to let Mac users buy Entourage without purchasing the entire Office suite. Or more accurately, if that was related to this.

    1. Re:And Entourage-only Mac-side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It probably relates to Apple's slipping market share. As you know, Apple is on very shakey ground financially. Frankly, many prominent industry analysts have crunched the numbers, concluding that Apple's outlook is bleak indeed.

      In Apple's latest numbers released in January for its fiscal first quarter of 2003, revenue fell from a year earlier and all of the company's major computer lines saw diminished numbers. PowerMac sales were down 20%, while iBook sales fell 8%.

      At the same time Apple's sales were falling, PC sales rose, though just slightly, according to figures from IDC released last month.

      The last time Apple was in this state, it brought back co-founder Steve Jobs to fix its issues. He fostered the development of the iMac and secured a US$150-million investment from Microsoft. But there aren't any new iMacs in Apple's future and Microsoft, bolstered by its victory over the U.S. Department of Justice, is clearly not going to help the beleaguered computer maker this time.

      So what have you got left? Apple is a company that controls around 3% of the computer market, has recently undergone a restructuring and is slowly fading into nothingness. Software makers don't even have Mac users on their radar and it's not like Apple can bring Mr. Jobs back to right the ship this time -- he's already there.

      Stick a fork in 'em -- this Apple is cooked.

  29. What monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is prevented from installing Linux on Apple computers. The EULA doesn't prevent it either. Go away, troll.

  30. What happens... by WetCat · · Score: 0

    if real pirates pirate a ship with Window$ distrubutives near Taiwan?

  31. Expensive bundles? by bytesmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article complains about software being packaged in expensive bundles.

    Just looking up the prices for MS software on Outpost.com, Word costs $340 and Excel costs $320, but Office itself only costs $440. Office also includes Powerpoint (another $320 by itself) and Outlook ($100 by itself).

    Even for just one component, you're far better off buying the bundle here in the US. How much is the bundle mark-up that they're complaining about?

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Expensive bundles? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Even for just one component, you're far better off buying the bundle here in the US.

      That's part of the point. If Microsoft "unbundles" Word from Office and sells it for just a small fraction less, then it's really not giving any meaningful customer choice.

      Word should, by all rights, cost at most half of Office. I would not be at all surprised if that still gave Microsoft the same profit as the entire Office. The bundling is more likely intended at leveraging one monopoly to create another.

    2. Re:Expensive bundles? by edverb · · Score: 1

      The price of an individual Office app is higher than it's value for exactly that reason...the decision to buy the whole Office suite becomes a no-brainer (thereby extending M$ dominance in the market for productivity apps). That pricing strategy is quite intentional on M$'s part. At vendor meetings, Microsoft tells VARs that if a customer needs more than one Office app (ie. Excel AND Word), sell them the Office suite. If a customer needs only one app (ie Word only), persuade the customer that if they will ever need a second Office app, it's "cheaper" for them to buy the whole Office suite, and that they get 3-4 more apps for that extra $100.

      --
      Vonnegut: "What is the purpose of life? To be the eyes, ears, and conscience of the Creator of the Universe, you fool."
    3. Re:Expensive bundles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      works suite comes with word (& a few other things too)

      retial price is usually around $75

    4. Re:Expensive bundles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but, you cannot install one component of Office on one computer, and another component on another computer... (you used to be able to, way back when).

    5. Re:Expensive bundles? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
      They also complained that Microsoft forced buyers to purchase expensive bundles of software rather than picking only the products they desired.

      The thing is, the prices for Office software are essentially arbitrary. It costs Microsoft exactly the same amount whether you buy just Word or the whole suite. Software companies like to make out that they are doing consumers a favour by offering 'flexible' pricing plans, but in fact the various complex systems are just there for market segmentation, to get the most out of each individual consumer. The idea of 'pay for what you use' makes little sense when each extra thing you use costs precisely zero to the manufacturer.

      If anything, they should be forcing Microsoft to bundle everything together - if you could only buy Windows + Office + Exchange Server + SQL Server + MS Bob 2.0 as a single package, and there were a big crackdown on piracy, then the price would come way down because MS would not want to surrender the desktop. But enforcing this would have no basis in competition law.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:Expensive bundles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook, there's the rub! You have to take Outhouse to get the other programs. Net value: they'll give you $560 off for the abuse!

  32. But, but, but by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Unbundle Software

    But Microsoft said the Operating System would become unstable without all that stuff + kitchen sink.

    "They wouldn't like, would they?"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:But, but, but by NathanBales · · Score: 1

      No, if you want the kitchen sink then you need Mozilla

    2. Re:But, but, but by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      > But Microsoft said the Operating System would become unstable without all that stuff + kitchen sink.

      Hmm... usually software becomes more stable when you remove extra crud. "An engineer knows he has attained perfection when there's nothing left to take away."

      However, MS software seems to work in opposite ways to normal software. No wonder they've already made a deal with Soviet Russia ;-)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:But, but, but by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "But Microsoft said the Operating System would become unstable without all that stuff + kitchen sink."

      RTFA. They were referring to seperating Excel, Word, and presumably Outlook. You're referring to IE, which has components that touch other areas of Windows.

  33. Russia has MS source! by wizardmax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft will also share its Windows source code as part of its Government Security Program, which allows governments to adapt the software and test its ability to fend off hackers.

    Russia was the first country to take advantage of the program in January. The source code--blueprints of Microsoft's dominant operating systems--is one of the world's most tightly protected corporate secrets.


    Knowing russian social structure, (considering I used to live there...) that source will quicly become public.

    KremlinXP anybody?

    --


    Free speech is getting expensive...
    1. Re:Russia has MS source! by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Russia was the first country to take advantage of the program in January.

      Actually, I thought it was a couple of years ago that Russia took advantage of the Windows source code offer.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    2. Re:Russia has MS source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the world's most tightly protected corporate secrets

      Is anybody else bothered by this? Journalists always make it seem as if Microsoft knows something fundamental about programming that nobody else knows, something that allows them to write operating systems. Whereas in reality it is more a question of basic OS theory, a good organizational structure, and a lot of warm bodies. Sure, Microsoft has these, but that is nothing special...

    3. Re:Russia has MS source! by wizardmax · · Score: 1

      Not all secrets are to keep info that is usefull. Some times its to hide the stupidity and mistakes and so on...

      --


      Free speech is getting expensive...
  34. And in Other News: by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Forced to Unbundle Software...... So what? Microsoft has made many agreements, is it really going to matter to them, Any amount of money could not keep microsoft from doing what it wants.

    We All know Bill Gates has a god complex, and thinks he can do whatever he wants.

    Next thing you know Microsoft will start bundling other software and hiding it, and it only comes out when you install the software.... GRRR Microsoft has pissed me off today so I am sorry if this sounds bitter. GOD DAMN IIS,

    --
    --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
  35. Yes, there are free alternatives by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    But do you think they *know* there are free alternatives?

    And why would them switch over another platform, being SO used to MS?

    1. Re:Yes, there are free alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But do you think they *know* there are free alternatives?"

      Yeah man, they`re so weird over there. Not at all like us Americans. I hear some of them talk in another language! I know, its weird, isn't it!

  36. We will see more of this by tsa · · Score: 1

    This is just the beginning. After Europe has dealt with MS America will follow.

    Man I sound like a starting Linux user. But I really think people are finally aware that they are mistreated by the giant and that they have the power to do something about it.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  37. Only making Office "modular" to Taiwan, not Window by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    Microsoft didn't agree to seperate the Windows operating system, only to sell the various applications of the Office Suite by themselves. In other words, it appears as though the Taiwanese will be able to buy only Word or Excel without having to purchase the entire suite. They are still as evil as they ever were when it comes to Windows.

  38. Pirates of Silicon Valley by Hellraisr · · Score: 1

    I just got the mental image of the Red Hat buildings driving up beside the MS buildings in Redmond and them having it out Monty Python style.

    Scary.. but.. that's the real way to be a pirate.

  39. next /. story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (AP Taiwan) Manufacturers are unable to explain why generic PC equipment they manufacture is unable to run on recent betas of windows.

  40. Why just Taiwan by kc8ioy · · Score: 1

    Why is Taiwan the only country who does this? Why can't other countries. But anyways, they are not forced to pirate, since you can always install an open-source or free Operating System instead. If you don't like those, you don't have to have a computer either.

    I still can't believe that Microsoft would do anything that would get in the way of their precious money that they worship everyday. I guess it depends how Taiwan forced them, maybe by aircraft or helicopter? ;-)

    1. Re:Why just Taiwan by jade42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could be that because Taiwan is such a small country and that it is so steeped in technology production. Most people in the world don't care enough to get their government to fight for them on tech issues.

      --

      Brought to you by the Artificial Idea Factory.
    2. Re:Why just Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With Intel and AMD delivering faster and more powerful processors at a rate which makes your head swim, the consequences are plain as day. Apple is hurting, its spindly financial footing sinking ever deeper into that fiscal bog of no return. Frankly, many prominent industry analysts have crunched the numbers, concluding that Apple's outlook is bleak indeed.

      In Apple's latest numbers released in January for its fiscal first quarter of 2003, revenue fell from a year earlier and all of the company's major computer lines saw diminished numbers. PowerMac sales were down 20%, while iBook sales fell 8%.

      At the same time Apple's sales were falling, PC sales rose, though just slightly, according to figures from IDC released last month.

      The last time Apple was in this state, it brought back co-founder Steve Jobs to fix its issues. He fostered the development of the iMac and secured a US$150-million investment from Microsoft. But there aren't any new iMacs in Apple's future and Microsoft, bolstered by its victory over the U.S. Department of Justice, is clearly not going to help the beleaguered computer maker this time.

      So what have you got left? Apple is a company that controls around 3% of the computer market, has recently undergone a restructuring and is slowly fading into nothingness. Software makers don't even have Mac users on their radar and it's not like Apple can bring Mr. Jobs back to right the ship this time -- he's already there.

      Stick a fork in 'em -- this Apple is cooked.

  41. Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by TimmyJoeB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could just use BSD or Linux with Open Office or KOffice.

    Better solution I believe!

    1. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by Lxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you in Taiwan?

      Do you know what these features are that they need?

      Openoffice/Koffice/et al are fine products, but don't run around saying that they're automatically the solution. That's bad karma.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by TimmyJoeB · · Score: 1

      What products of M$ are we talking about here?

      OfficeXP, WIndows XP ??

      How are these products so unique that they could not be replaced? You are right though, I do not know exactly what they are talking about and I do not know what software they are talking about. It sounds like just generic stuff, but I could be wrong. If it is just generic word processing and spreadsheets, then the open source product could do the job just fine.
      If it is firewalls and web servers, open source is the leader.

      If it is scientific solutions, there may or may not be solutions in the open source market.

    3. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      According to the article, they just want one office component (I assume Word) without the other crap.

      I use OpenOffice. I think it's a great word processor. There are users who dispise it, because it's missing advanced features of Word and Wordperfect (some use Word, some WP). So, without knowing what they need exactly, it's hard to walk in and say "Open Office/KDE Office/Applix can do that, switch!". Can I get by with anything? Yes. Can the clerical staff use it? No way.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by cranos · · Score: 1

      Umm just to point out that the TV Station where I work has been replacing Word with Open Office for several months now. Sure some people have complained about it, but for the most part they're just bitching because its something new.

      For clerical use, it is fine, its only when you move into the Macro dev area that you have a problem.

    5. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could just use BSD or Linux with Open Office or KOffice.

      But they are using BSD. Blue screen of death- that is.

    6. Re:Why doesn't Taiwan just say no? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      its only when you move into the Macro dev area that you have a problem.

      Macros and templates. Two of the most difficult things to convert, and wouldn't you know, we've got hundreds of them. The effort needed to switch word processors is unthinkable.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  42. Re:WAR3Z - mistake in title by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

    I do believe that it is spelled Warez...
    This War 3 z that you talk about sounds scary... I'm hoping that it was simply a mistake...

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  43. Jonses, et al by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I find it hard to believe that anyone can be 'forced' to pirate Windows, or Office, or whatever.

    Yeah, but keep in mind there are people convinced that it is essential to have Windows to live the good life, and even those who are trying to keep up with the Jonses (not everyone in the world thinks western or like americans) If the Jonses have WinXP and you're sitting there with your humble (pirated) copy of Win98 and the outlay for XP would ecclipse your disposable income for a month, you nip down to Chang's Software Emporium and buy a copy of XP (sans-license) from he-of-the-large-overcoat-in-the-alley-next-door for a measely pittance (or two.) Now you're up with the Jonses, Bill Gates is still in the news driving his big yacht up and down the boulevards of Seattle, and everyone has the good life.

    Ok, it's wrong, but if Microsoft played the game the MPAA does with DVD's, they could market cheaper versions, specifically for markets with lower median incomes. (Then they may do this, but still at a price high enough to be a barrier.)

    The peer pressure to be viewed as a success is high, and anything some people can do to achieve that appearance they will do. Ethics are up to the individual.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Jonses, et al by yourmom16 · · Score: 0
      Ok, it's wrong, but if Microsoft played the game the MPAA does with DVD's, they could market cheaper versions, specifically for markets with lower median incomes. (Then they may do this, but still at a price high enough to be a barrier.)

      That is a violation of the Clayton Antitrust Act, which requires compannies to charge all customers the same amount. If they are charged under that law they will probably successfully claim its not a violation because everyone is still in the US even though that is irrelevant.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    2. Re:Jonses, et al by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      That is a violation of the Clayton Antitrust Act, which requires compannies to charge all customers the same amount.

      Yeah, but..

      A. Microsoft has already been convicted and punished for antitrust violations (you naughty, naughty company, don't do that again, or .. or .. or I shall be forced to scold you again!)

      B. We're talking about outside the US market, particularly Taiwan, R.O.C. This would more likely require something in the WTO accords.

      The label 'Joneses' is colloquial and simply refers to a party which someone attempts to achieve parity with (i.e. as nice a house, as nice a car, as nice a lawn)

      It has been noted elsewhere that part of the problem of piracy is because the PR and/or product is so good (or perceived to be so good) that everyone must have it (you already know this has worked for decades on management in american businesses 'moo')

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. The US doesn't have to by Lysol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cuz we can afford it. In a lot of other countries around the world where a worker only brings home $1200 a year (and that's rich for some villagers in China), how can they afford a $100-$300USD app suite? Enter the five finger or low cost piracy. Plain and simple economics, not ethics. And since when is M$ an ethical company anyway?

    1. Re:The US doesn't have to by Selfbain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Er... you think a worker that only makes $1200 a year needs an operating system? I hate to break it to you but I doubt he has a computer.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    2. Re:The US doesn't have to by flatt · · Score: 1

      You make a decent point, but for these people to try to keep up with the digitalized world they must. With that said, who needs to be sending huge amounts of money on an OS? ;)

    3. Re:The US doesn't have to by jaaron · · Score: 1

      Just want to point out that the demographics of Taiwan are rather different from the demographics of mainland China. And since it's Taiwan that we're talking about none of those $1200 a year Chinese villagers get any of this deal.

      Taiwan has internet cafes and computer shops just about everywhere, even in the out of the way places (okay, maybe not in the rice fields, but you get my point).

      --
      Who said Freedom was Fair?
    4. Re:The US doesn't have to by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Ya but they're NOT keeping up with the digitalized world. A village that's composed of people whose income is $1200 or lower might not even have electricity or running water (correct me if I'm wrong on that). If that's the case, they probably only have vague ideas as to what computers even are.

      Hmm.. of course my mom's been using a computer for about 5 years and she still only has a vague idea of what it is... Her main skill with it seems to be breaking it in amazingly original ways and then calling me to fix it.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    5. Re:The US doesn't have to by edgezone · · Score: 1
      Cuz we can afford it. In a lot of other countries around the world where a worker only brings home $1200 a year (and that's rich for some villagers in China), how can they afford a $100-$300USD app suite? Enter the five finger or low cost piracy. Plain and simple economics, not ethics. And since when is M$ an ethical company anyway?
      While that's a valid point in general, it really doesn't apply to this situation, since we're talking about Taiwan, not China. Taiwan had a GDP per capita (at purchasing power parity) of 22,676 in 2001 (compared to the US at 35,032 and China at 5,935). So a 100-300$ app suite there is NOT 25% of the typical family budget as in your scenario. So yes, I think the US could still learn from this example.
      --
      -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    6. Re:The US doesn't have to by mikio71 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      if they're using a computer, which has been sold to them from the back of a truck, they probably need an operating system Seriously speaking, it's all boils down to economics. While working in Taiwan, I was taking home a whopping US$11,000 / yr., and people generally working in the same salary range as me all had computers in their home. Why? The hardware is cheaper since most of its made locally anyway, and the software is all pirated. Think about the DVD or console gaming market. They price fix by using region encoding. I mean... for Region 2, for example, how are countries such as Japan and S. Africa, lumped into the same region as Europe? Or how is Mexico excluded from the US/Canada Region 1? It's all about the pricing and cost of living. So a person living in the US, could not go into Mexico to buy a cheaper DVD, and play it back on his own DVD player in America (of course, this isn't exactly true, but let's take the average consumer who doesn't hack his box). M$ is essentially in the same boat, but instead of region encoding, it uses language to regionally encode its software. For the most part, the average US computer buyer probably doesn't want a machine in Chinese, while the average Taiwanese computer buyer probably doesn't want a machine in English. M$ can essentially fix the price in Taiwan to a lower price point, and get more people to buy the software at the lower price, rather than selling it at a higher price point, but getting a handful of sales instead. While lowering the cost may lower M$ price margin, I figure that the volume being bigger would make its profit much higher. On the other hand, this is Taiwan we're talking about... It's a very price sensitive area, so the pirates will always be around. The trick is for M$ to lower their prices to a point that the difference between buying a legit copy over a pirate copy is trivial. The problem is that with the prices of hardware and media coming down as they are, the pirates will always be able to produce their wares for pennies, and it's all a matter of how much inventory they can keep in stock, without cutting into their profit margin, however minimal it may be after M$ puts a price cut. In the end, people should probably just migrate over to Linux, and not worry about licensing and payments as much, but I figure that's not gonna happen at anytime soon.

    7. Re:The US doesn't have to by flyingroc · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is hardly a poor country! Remember, Taiwan is a powerhouse in electronics manufacturing, much of the world's memory chips come from this small country. GDP per capita in Taiwan for 2001 is around $17,000. Only 1% of Taiwanese live below the poverty line.

      You can find out more from the CIA World Fact Book
    8. Re:The US doesn't have to by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Ya but my point was only aimed at people making $1200ish. Someone in that income range is probably having enough troubles keeping food on the table and clothes on their back. I really doubt a computer is something they're interested at all.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    9. Re:The US doesn't have to by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      Er... you think a worker that only makes $1200 a year needs an operating system? I hate to break it to you but I doubt he has a computer.

      Agreed but the previous poster has a point. The people who can afford a computer (those making 10 to 20 thousand a year USD) will find that 300+ dollars for software (or 2% of their income) is very expensive.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    10. Re:The US doesn't have to by mikio71 · · Score: 1
      I think you missed my point then.

      It all comes down to the cost of living.

      You are looking at it from a very US-centric point of view. Prices vary from country to country. Let's take my Taiwan example:

      I was paid about $11,000/yr. If you look at it from the US point of view, that's going beyond poverty. In the US, at $11k/yr., I'm barely paying the rent. In Taiwan, granted, the rent took up half my take home, everything else was cheap. For a studio apartment in a pretty good neighborhood, and pretty good part of town, I was paying about $400/month to live in this fully furnished apartment, that didn't come crumbling down during the 1999 earthquake. For breakfast, lunch, and dinner, my combined daily expense for eating out was almost $5. Basically, I had enough money to pay the bills, eat well, get around town, and pay the rent, and still have a little left over. Eventually I got a raise and some bonus, so I had a little extra to "splurge".

      now... in China, if you are making $1200ish, your cost of living is probably adjusted as well. Maybe you are eating at pennies a day, and paying rent closer to $100/month.

      there's also the issue of exchange rate that gets in the way. What you can buy with $1200 in the US, might not get you very far, but for a country such as China, it might bring you a pretty comfortable living.

      In any case, what I'm trying to say is that you cannot judge simply by looking at it from the US perspective. It simply does not match up dollar for dollar, RMB for RMB.

    11. Re:The US doesn't have to by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I lived in Taiwan for 5 years. I was highly paid as an English teacher- about 15 bucks an hour for maybe 20 hours a week.

      When I heard computers calling me back I went up to AsusTek looking for a job writing manuals. Y'know how much they offered the first time? 12,000 USD a year plus "stock options." When I let my friends know I thought that was pathetic and turned it down they were amazed. People over there live on less, and dream about working at AsusTek. They have computers and cars. No S***! They just all live with their parents (my brother in law makes a bit more as an MCSE sysadmin at Viewsonic, has a PocketPC, a color couple cell phones, a car and counts himself really darned well off)

      Their final offer was 25,000, no stock options (the "options" could not be exercised until after you quit, you got a lot of 1000 after two years, and a lot every year thereafter. The "option" was not given to you, but kept in the President's safe and given to you when you quit if he liked you)

      Prices used to be a lot less for hardware over there. But that was when it was 25nt to the dollar. Last time I checked prices are about the same (if it costs a 100 US here, it costs within 3% of that there).

    12. Re:The US doesn't have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the 1200 a year person is using Microsoft Excel to keep track of all his personal finances eh? I'd think he could just use a post-it.

    13. Re:The US doesn't have to by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. the question interested me enough to spend a bit of time looking it up. I found a site from Australia that was talking about improving the living conditions in rural China where in some places they don't even have a cash economy and have to carry water huge distances. I also found some statistics that showed the average Chinese male (in the city) does earn around $1200 a year so I guess that would be about the range to buy a computer. However, the average Chinese male farmer only earns around $500 a year and that's probably closer to the income range I was thinking about.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    14. Re:The US doesn't have to by Tingler · · Score: 1

      The Economist released another way to compare economies that uses a standard that is even more constant than dollars or euros. They call it the "Hamburger Standard" & it uses the McDonalds Big Mac to compare different economies. Here is where you can find the chart:

      http://www.oanda.com/products/bigmac/bigmac.shtm l

    15. Re:The US doesn't have to by efutch · · Score: 1

      You have your pricing upside down...DVDs are MUCH cheaper in Region 1 (USA) than in Region 4 (Latin America). So, we buy regionless DVD players in order to play cheap DVDs and the occasional renting of a region 4 one.

      --
      Minix en español! http://www.es-minix.org
    16. Re:The US doesn't have to by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      BTW,some software houses have already realised - you have to slash prices to make revenues here, instead of making nothing on local markets - I've bought two or three localised games (Jagged Alliance 2, most notably) legally, with jewel box version for less than $4.

      Capitalism at work.
      Makes me smile.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    17. Re:The US doesn't have to by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      They get the OS bundled with their computer for free. Or quasi-free, for the pedants.

      I can't deal with it anymore that people piss and moan and grumble about how OEMs bundle Windows with their systems, at a cost that everybody seems to agree is about $30-50, yet consistenly bandy around the top-shelf retail box price of Windows as if people pay that much for it.

      I bet less than 10% of the people who read this site have bought a retail box new copy of a Windows OS. Further, less than that of the general computer-using public have.

    18. Re:The US doesn't have to by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
      The trick is for M$ to lower their prices to a point that the difference between buying a legit copy over a pirate copy is trivial.

      After the '99 quake, the Taiwanese media kept recirculating images of the same two or three damaged Taipei buildings -- despite the fact that central Taiwan was reeling under massive devastation -- simply because they were conveniently located in their own backyard. Most foreign entities doing business in Taiwan tend to be similarly myopically focused on the Taipei market -- ignorant of the fact that Taipei's cost of living is a full 30 percent higher than most of the rest of the island -- simply because it's where most businesses -- and the government -- are HQ'ed. It's a bit like all the press China's economy has gotten in recent years, totally oblivious to the fact that all the economic development is happening in Shanghai, while 90% of China's population is still mired in stagnation and unemployment. Just as Shanghai is not China, so Taipei is not Taiwan.

      In any case, I suspect the devil will be in the details. For example, the article reports:

      "It said Microsoft would cut prices by an average of 26.7 percent"

      The American auto industry must report fleet average MPGs on all automobiles sold. What they don't tell you is that, after averaging, the cream of the fleet is siphoned off and sold at higher profit margins to governments, businesses, etc., meaning the car you buy stands about a snowball's chance of ever achieving the reported MPG. Most of MS's "average of 26.7 percent" will find its way into government and business coffers, leaving the retail consumer out of the loop.

      Also from the article:

      "Consumers said they had been forced to turn to illegal copies because Microsoft had used its virtual monopoly to inflate prices."

      Balderdash. While this argument might make a good stick for MS bashing, the fact is the decision to pirate MS products is almost always made at the vendor, not the consumer, level. Profit margins of less than $US200 per system don't allow most Ma and Pa vendors the luxury of legitimacy, and a 26 percent price break isn't going to change that.

      My inquiries a while back elicited surprise from several vendors, simply because few consumers know enough to even ask. And of those who DO, I doubt one in ten cares. Note that none of these consumers is making an active decision to pirate, they're simply not interested in the issues.

      And why would the average consumer want to go stumping around advocating for Microsoft products anyway -- especially when it means money out of their own pockets? The sound of Microsoft, of all companies, blowing the trumpet for ethical behavior lends new meaning to the term "surreal".

      Lee Kaiwen,
      Taiwan, ROC

    19. Re:The US doesn't have to by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder.

      What would happen if the American consumer ever realized that people in other parts of the world are paying much less for the exact same product. Could you imagine if everybody in the US refused to get screwed? Now that would be something.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    20. Re:The US doesn't have to by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And one suspects that a lot of the "recycled" computers that are being dismantled in China are first tested to see if any of the parts are still functional, and if so, cobbled into perfectly workable systems and sold cheaply to local residents.

      (For those who don't think anything "usable" gets dumpstered, I've got two P3s built from salvage.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:The US doesn't have to by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      I can't deal with it anymore that people piss and moan and grumble about how OEMs bundle Windows with their systems, at a cost that everybody seems to agree is about $30-50, yet consistenly bandy around the top-shelf retail box price of Windows as if people pay that much for it.

      You think like an American. These people don't go to DELL and buy a PC. They buy used or they assemble it themselves or they get it mail-order at one of those OS-less websites and pay much less for a computer.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    22. Re:The US doesn't have to by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Computers which are a few years old can often be obtained for free (dumpsters?) or for negligible amounts of money. And ofcourse theres always illegal methods of obtaining hardware aswell.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:The US doesn't have to by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Same goes for the Philippines.. Take a ride downtown to somewhere like SM Megamall (Makati) and side by side you have the option of legitimate or pirated software - no rocket science needed. If you are so morally inclined I guess you buy the originals (I have few morals myself!)

  45. If only by vrassoc · · Score: 1

    If only hardware distributors would now start selling their box to me at the price less the cost of the OEM M$ OS, if I don't want it, then the world would be a better place.

  46. Re:Article Text by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, I'm trying to not read the article here... and then you ambush me with this... How can I be expected to write nonsensical flames from the summary if you are confronting me with the *full text* of the article!? Come on, gimme a break here.

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  47. Strange... by gillbates · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Consumers said they had been forced to turn to illegal copies because Microsoft had used its virtual monopoly to inflate prices.

    So even though a federal court found MS guilty of doing the same thing here, MS got to keep their high prices and predatory practices. Amazing.

    It seems as if Taiwan has succeeded in doing what John Ashcroft and Co. (and his predecessors, for that matter) could never do: control Microsoft. Strange, isn't it, that Taiwan can effectively demand concessions from a foreign company when our own DOJ can't even enforce the judgements they do have against a domestic one...

    Yeah, the future's bright. I think I'm going to start a monopoly somewhere - then I can tell John Ashcroft and the DOJ where to go...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Strange... by MxTxL · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strange, isn't it, that Taiwan can effectively demand concessions from a foreign company

      One thing to consider (not saying this happened here, but it's interesting) is that Taiwan comes from a position of power in the computer world. Piss them off, and memory prices could triple. Similar situation with lots of other computer components.... MS can't sell so many new copies of windows when nobody is buying computers anymore....

    2. Re:Strange... by pmineiro · · Score: 1

      It seems as if Taiwan has succeeded in doing what John Ashcroft and Co. (and his predecessors, for that matter) could never do: control Microsoft.

      Not so strange, when you consider that M$ employs alot more people in the US than in Taiwan.

      Outside of America, M$ dominance of the software world is seen as part of American hegemony and hence to be resisted. Inside America, people only think this on slashdot :)

      -- p

    3. Re:Strange... by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      Taiwan comes from a position of power in the computer world. Piss them off, and memory prices could triple.

      Duh!

      By tripling the price of memory prices they would make much less, not more money, in the long run. Otherwise they would already have tripled it ! So what you are saying is that taiwanese businesses would hurt themselves badly just to see MS affected -- not likely, not at all.

      Consider why they may not be able to play with prices, even if that's what they wanted. Look at competition in that market (other suppliers in US, Korea, Japan, Europe, or even withing TW). Taiwan has a large share *because* it is a leader in cost/price. Raise prices, and see share going down, down, down.

      However there *is* a position of power: the Taiwanese government playing with their institutional weight *within* the Taiwanese market, for instance in regard to the strictness of piracy control. Another bargaining token (not necessarily explicit) is the potential official support to use of MS product alternatives (e.g. consider all public service computers migrating to Linux/OpenOffice).

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  48. Re:KremlinXP by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now we can soon also get the Red Screen of Death, and Microsoft Ivan?

  49. I thought Kdevelop and g++ were free to everybody! by TimmyJoeB · · Score: 1

    What is this crummy VisualStudio.Net you speak of?

    I have never heard of it!! I use Kdevelop and g++!!

    They are free!! Any developmnet environment that you pay for and then forces you to stay only with it is useless!!

  50. Software Bundle Fun by methangel · · Score: 1

    Ok, the practice of unbundling software seems pretty nifty in theory. I don't really see a point for Microsoft to do that -- "big bad monopoly" aside. Office XP is indeed overpriced, but how many corporate offices only need/use Microsoft Word, but not Excel or Access? Something smells fishy in Taiwan.

    Hell, if I could pick and mix my Operating System, that would be pretty swank. I'd do away with all of the included applications outside of notepad (force of habit.) Final price for JUST the Operating system itself? 10 dollah. It last long time.

    The Taiwanese build everything from my alarm clock to my TV, why are they bitching about OfficeXP and piracy? Why can't they code up TaiwanOffice?

    Unbundling MS Office won't change the fact the majority of the Asian countries always have and always will pirate software. For many people in these ancient lands, piracy is how they get their income.

    Now, for all of you MS haters -- you should be happy that the Asian people can make a living off of raping Microsoft!

    I got nothin'

  51. Probably a quid pro quo by jratcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It looks like what really happened here is that the Taiwanese gov't "implied" to MSFT that, if they didn't show some flexibility in app bundling (Office apps, NOT Windows), then they Taiwanese gov't wouldn't be very supportive when it came to cracking down on piracy. So MSFT cuts prices, and the gov't continues to make some effort to reduce piracy.

    1. Re:Probably a quid pro quo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. Taiwan's pressure to crack down on piracy comes mainly from the US government. They don't want to be in the US's Special 301 Priority Watchlist of IPR violators. Most probably the Taiwanese government 'implied' that they will shift their focus toward open source, since the government is one of MS's main customer.

    2. Re:Probably a quid pro quo by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      if they didn't show some flexibility in app bundling (Office apps, NOT Windows), then they Taiwanese gov't wouldn't be very supportive when it came to cracking down on piracy.

      Whereas in US MS can just bribe the politicians with money to crack on piracy, in Taiwan it has to play nice with the PEOPLE and lower prices/unbundle Windows.
      Looks like Taiwan government got a better deal for its citizens...

    3. Re:Probably a quid pro quo by GlassHeart · · Score: 1

      You can call it quid pro quo if you want, but the only real solution to copyright infringement is exactly more reasonable prices and stricter enforcement.

  52. It has a draw back .. by Khalidz0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pirated software (Especially MS software) is also used here, but then, this has a big draw back for the people using the software.

    Huge programs have localized specifications, which require a bit of more work, and cost the company money, if the company does not gain money through this country, these localizations will not be worked on anymore, and then the whole country/area would lose.

    Seems MS however, in this case, have thoughtfully considered the issue and found out that reducing prices and wining the user is worth more than otherwise, but would this always be the case? I really doubt so!

    Khalid

    --
    "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
    1. Re:It has a draw back .. by oconnorcjo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...if the company does not gain money through this country, these localizations will not be worked on anymore, and then the whole country/area would lose. Seems MS however, in this case, have thoughtfully considered the issue and found out that reducing prices and wining the user is worth more than otherwise, but would this always be the case? I really doubt so!

      Microsoft would issue an Asian version even if they knew they would never make a profit on it -PERIOD-.

      Why?

      Because Microsoft would hate to see competition evolve anywhere in the world. Imagine if China/Taiwan/Wherever HAD to go over to a new operating system because MS refused to support the region. All those people writing software for another OS would cut into the monopoly hold they have over the desktop. MS would NEVER RISK it. PERIOD. When countries start talking about alternative OS's, Microsoft starts discounting and giving away software.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
  53. hehe by CmdrTaco+(1)+on · · Score: 1

    at least M$ is admitting they are price gouging their csutomres

    --
    Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
  54. Rindows Pwice Cut, ah-sole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwan: Preeze to be lowawing Rindows Pwices

    Gates: No

    Taiwan: We can pray such high pwices for honowable Rindows Softrare

    Gates: No

    Taiwan: But you have such rarge penises. Our penises vewy vewy smarl. Preeze to be making cheaper Rindows

    Gates: Aww, shucks... Ok..

  55. Re:HOT GRITS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard Ms Clause is "late".. hehe if you know what I mean...

    *wink wink*

  56. e-Japan by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1
    Wonder if these are related?

    (thanks to pxlinuonline.com for the link)

    e-japan

    During a meeting with the e-Japan task force within the Liberal Democratic Party, Gates said open-source systems would be difficult to use for commercial purposes as their code is freely available. He urged government leaders to consider using software that required licensing fees for the sake of promoting growth in the software industry.

    --
    I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    1. Re:e-Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I urge the government to use complex tax laws instead of simple ones for the sake of promoting the tax preparer industry.

      I am using the same logic here, but the result is obviously bad for the economy as a whole. software is not much different. Use the cheapest software available that will do the job. This will result in an economy that can produce the most for the least.

  57. crazy. by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need.

    So that explains why piracy effects nearly industry in asian countries. Its simply due to illegal monopolies and bundling useless stuff with useful stuff. Apparently people wanting to get something for nothing isn't the real reason after all.

  58. YES!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Marine.

    I'm ready for war.

    HURAHHHHH!!!

    Anyone for a Saddam burger?

  59. Re:KremlinXP by Garion911 · · Score: 1

    Heh.. All I picture is Clippy with a Soviet military hat on, with a AK47 or somesuch (not a gun person..)

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  60. China Conducts A Preemtive Strike On Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "after a backlash from the country's effort"



    Slashdot has now taken a firm position on Taiwanese independence.

  61. Re:FRANCE SUCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dude, give up the "YOU FAIL IT" stuff.

    Its not really as funny as "In Soviet Russia..."

    If you think your going to be the creator of something as funny as "In Soviet Russia..." your sorely misktaken. "YOU FAIL IT" won't take off.

    Saying that of your attemt to be funny and creative, and hoping to put your mark on slashdot... well YOU FAIL IT!

    p.s. the french are floofies too

  62. them and everyone else by Erris · · Score: 1
    [M$ crap costs too much] This is a problem most people under 24 seem to have...

    No, it's a problem everyone has. Ask your IT guys how much your company pays for software. The product is greater than the sum its the parts as it is passed down through the food chain. Where do you think M$'s billions of dollars come from? Those billions of dollars represent a significant but unnecessary economic friction. The waste M$ forces onto everyone in the form of file formats and work disruption is even greater than the billions that can be counted. I don't even want to think about privacy and data security issues, but the costs of "I love you" were reported to be in the billions too.

    The good people of Taiwan will be happy to pass thoses costs along and you can expect the cost of electronic components, clothes and other goods to go up by that little chunck. Or they will get smart and start using free software.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  63. Fuck the French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am boycotting fries.

    1. Re:Fuck the French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just fuck the french hotties.

      the only good thing to cum out of.. cum in... err.. hmmmm

  64. 24? by lysium · · Score: 2, Funny

    Raise that number. We are in a recession.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  65. Politically correct! by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    Since Linux is now a business, /. can no longer bash rich white guys with software factory towns for being white, rich, or monopolists! So, we now have to resort to reasoned arguments... oh, wait... this is /.

    Children love both nicotine and windows!

  66. Are they serious? by rilian4 · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft will also share its Windows source code..."

    I never expected M$ to do this in a million years. Does the US government have the same access to windows source code?

    --

    ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    1. Re:Are they serious? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      Dude, have you been under a rock?

      Windows source has been availble to schools and government entities for quite some time.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:Are they serious? by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      How then do you explain this statement from the article if the source code is so widely available?

      "The source code--blueprints of Microsoft's dominant operating systems--is one of the world's most tightly protected corporate secrets"

      Also, if your statement is true, why do /.'ers whine all the time about M$ not releasing source to anyone...

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    3. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> why do /.'ers whine all the time about M$ not releasing source to anyone?

      Because most of them are idiots, the rest are whining about it not being shared for free, or the fact that they cant use it.

      And the statement from the article is not false, just worded pooly. It is a tightly protected corporate secret. That doesnt mean you cant see the source (for auditing purposes), you just cant USE it.

    4. Re:Are they serious? by Lxy · · Score: 1

      Very bottom of the article talks about Russia having access to the source, and in fact there's a link to the announcement from Microsoft about this program.

      Sheesh.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    5. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but the NSA, the shadow government, and the trilateral commission do so it is ok.

  67. And I thought they were using PenPoint as a club by WillAdams · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well darn.

    (Taiwan's Ministry of Information Technology bought all rights to the PenPoint OS and UI back when Go Corp. when bankrupt (see Jerry Kaplan's book _StartUp_) and I'd always wondered if it'd been to use it as bargaining chip to get better prices.)

    Another great conspiracy theory down the drain.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  68. "forced"? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    Unless my understanding of the Taiwanese political climate is way off, no one was FORCED to buy pirate copies of any Microsoft product. If valid licensed copies of Windows were out of the average person's affordability range, he or she still has the choice to not have a copy of Windows at all.

    1. Re:"forced"? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      companies say "you must use product x. or we wont do business with you" so, get a copy of what we demand, or get no money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:"forced"? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      And they're forced to do business with said company? I didn't know the slavery problem was still that bad...

  69. Luckily Linux is free by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't, most distributions would be in a similar than MS is. With some major distros spanning 7+ CDs and bundled with everything from a Fortran 77 compiler to a rewrite of the Ultima VII engine, Microsoft's bundling doesn't seem strange. In fact, if current market share was not an issue, there would be very few reasons to pick a MS OS over any major Linux distro. After all, almost every piece of software Joe Sixpack might ever want to use comes in the distro!

    I belive that MS's bundling is evil (like the axis), and maybe even criminal. However, we have to understand that it is wrong just because of MS's stranglehold of the market. If the mere act of bundling one product with another was the core of the problem, Linux distros would be the greater evil.

  70. Configuring? Try FreeBSD by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    No don't laugh right away! FreeBSD is one of the most easily configurable *NIX'es I've worked with. Just do a base install, keep the handbook close at hand (just install the doc package) and you can set it all up the way you want it. And you don't need a CS degree to do it.
    Admitted it will take a lot of your time initially but it *NEVER* crashes.. (insert appropriate disclaimer: it never crashed for me yet).
    You'll also learn very much about UNIX and the way computers work in general while going through setting up your own box.
    The main reason people don't understand Linux is, IMHO, the fact that every distribution does things differently from the other. Even across versions of the same distro. And they all come with everything and -recently- even the kitchen sink preinstalled.
    I run a FreeBSD desktop at home which took me ages to set up, but I know exactly where everything is and how things interact.
    At work I have RedHat 8.0 running on a scanner workstation. The thing installs within minutes and has everything I need on it by default. No tweaking needed and RH-Network keeps the box up to date quite reasonably. If it ever fails I just reinstall RH and the defaults work again, just need to add some NFS mounts.

    Linux' complexity lies in its distributors trying to over-simplify an inherently complex system. And the reason for it being complex is the fact that everything about it is open and configurable. Want simple linux? You have to cut down on configurability. Yes, even *SHUDDER* hard-code settings in there maybe.

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  71. Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seems the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost...

    Ya, and I was forced to steal cable TV and uncap my cable modem and copy videos I rented all because they're more than I can afford to pay.

    Geez, just because you can't afford something doesn't give you the right to steal it (or infringe on the copyright as the case may be). There are affordable alternatives out there to most expensive things.

    --
    47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    1. Re:Forced by Lxy · · Score: 1

      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

      It's 83%. Get your facts straight.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 1
      It's 83%. Get your facts straight.

      I'd fight you on this, but I'll let it go since I see that you're a user of the one true editor, vi. ;)

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    3. Re:Forced by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      i totally agree with you... now, how do i uncap the modem?

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Forced by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Most expensive things don't generate proprietary data that then must be decoded by EVERYONE ELSE THAT COMMUNICATES with you.

      Anyone should have the right to counteract the effects of abusive monopoly practices.

      The copyrights on Windows and Office should be NULL and void.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Forced by geekoid · · Score: 1

      suppose cable cost 1/5 you yearly gross wage.
      now suppose you can't get a job unless you have cable.
      sounds like you would be forced to get cable, or starve.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      suppose cable cost 1/5 you yearly gross wage.

      now suppose you can't get a job unless you have cable.

      sounds like you would be forced to get cable, or starve.

      So these people need to have Windows for survival? I see your point, but I don't think it's valid. It would have to be a very strange set of circumstances for one to say "I had to pirate Windows or I would die," wouldn't it?

      Suppose for a job that a person has chosen, that person has to have Windows. What's stopping that person from looking for a different job that doesn't require them to pirate software?

      Say you have a guy who grew up in the inner city and for whatever reason dropped out of high school. He's broke and can't find a job. Maybe this person should become a drug dealer. It's not ethical, and it's definitely not legal, but the guy can't seem to find a job anywhere else. Does that make it alright to sell crack to kids? No!

      It's not that much different. These circumstances are no excuse for pirating software.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    7. Re:Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 1
      Most expensive things don't generate proprietary data that then must be decoded by EVERYONE ELSE THAT COMMUNICATES with you.

      If you need to read Office documents, see OpenOffice. Or even Microsoft's free viewers.

      Anyone should have the right to counteract the effects of abusive monopoly practices.

      No, those in authority have the responsibility to counteract the problems, just as the Tiwanese government has done. What you are calling for is anarchy.

      The copyrights on Windows and Office should be NULL and void.

      Why, because they are popular? Granted, Microsoft has abused a monopoly power, but that does not warrant robbing them of the work they have done. The punishment must fit the crime. If you work 20 years compiling a dictionary and it becomes so popular that it's the de facto standard, but you start charging too much for it, should your dictionary suddenly be thrown into the public domain?

      Like I pointed out before, there are alternatives that serve the same function. You can use OpenOffice on Linux with WINE and do virtually anything you could do with Office and Windows.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    8. Re:Forced by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      When governments fail, people have to act for themsleves in their own best interests.

      To deny this to people is simply unjust.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Forced by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Suppose for a job that a person has chosen, that person has to have Windows. What's stopping that person from looking for a different job that doesn't require them to pirate software?

      Exactly. And while we're excluding low wage earners from getting higher-status jobs, I'd like to also do the same to trailer trash, euro trash, and people from outside my country's borders. Actually, I'd like to ensure that only people that look and act like me can enjoy a good job! Where's them Indians with their caste system when you need 'em?

      [ Ugh, having to work with those dirty poor people sucks. I think I'll make having windows experience part of my requirements to work here. ]

      >Say you have a guy who grew up in the inner city and for whatever reason dropped out of high school. He's broke and can't find a job. Maybe this person should become a drug dealer. It's not ethical, and it's definitely not legal, but the guy can't seem to find a job anywhere else. Does that make it alright to sell crack to kids? No!

      No. But who says a drug dealer sells to children? Only an idiot drug dealer would do that, like the ones most US propaganda shows you. Real drug dealers are a hell of a lot more intelligent than that. That's why the US spends so many billions trying to stop drugs entering the country. Of course, it's always going to be a waste of effort, unless you want to live in a panopticon.

      If you're outside the US, I'm not sure where you got that stereotype from, because when I was in grade school, it wasn't until I was old enough to smoke that I was even offered a joint, never mind crack.

      >It's not that much different. These circumstances are no excuse for pirating software.

      Huh? Selling crack to kids and pirating software are one and the same?

      Please say that's not the conclusion you were trying to draw!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 1
      Exactly. And while we're excluding low wage earners from getting higher-status jobs, I'd like to also do the same to trailer trash, euro trash, and people from outside my country's borders. Actually, I'd like to ensure that only people that look and act like me can enjoy a good job! Where's them Indians with their caste system when you need 'em? [ Ugh, having to work with those dirty poor people sucks. I think I'll make having windows experience part of my requirements to work here. ]

      Life's not fair. Get over it. I want to be a race car driver. Guess what? You have to have money to get into the sport, or you could steal all your gear. I also want to be an NBA player. Guess what? You have to be really good at basketball. Not everyone can do do any job. You just have to play the cards life deals you.

      But who says a drug dealer sells to children? Only an idiot drug dealer would do that, like the ones most US propaganda shows you. Real drug dealers are a hell of a lot more intelligent than that.

      This is a bit OT, but I had a few friends in high school who did drugs. Guess where they got their drugs? Other high schoolers. Guess where those dealers got their drugs? Other high schoolers. I knew the largest crack supplier in the county. She was 17. Out of the whole ring of dealers I was aware of, nobody was over 25. Don't tell me dealers don't sell to kids.

      Selling crack to kids and pirating software are one and the same?

      Yes, from the standpoint of they are both illegal and unethical. That's all that I was trying to say.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    11. Re:Forced by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Life's not fair. Get over it.

      That's a real conversation stopper. But I'll ignore it for now...

      > I want to be a race car driver. Guess what? You have to have money to get into the sport,

      Huh? No you don't. Start at the bottom and work your way up. Start as a mechanic, work your way to being a driver.

      >I also want to be an NBA player. Guess what? You have to be really good at basketball. Not everyone can do do any job.

      Huh? Again, if you were actually interested in basketball, and a healthy person, you can do anything you want to, if you put your mind to it.

      Life isn't fair when it's a disability you can't do anything about. But even then, the world makes exceptions.

      The world does not make exceptions for people who have ability and simply choose not to use it. The world _does_ make exceptions for those who have actual probles that are unsurmountable, like having no legs, for example. Or at least in my country, they do.

      Excuses like yours are used by ever "VCR flashing 12:00" person I've met. "Reading the manual is out of my league". Unless you have dyslexia, it ain't. Just like if I cared to lose 50 pounds, basketball isn't out of my league. But I don't tell people I simply can't do it. I tell them I don't want to. There's a difference.

      >This is a bit OT, but I had a few friends in high school who did drugs. Guess where they got their drugs? Other high schoolers. Guess where those dealers got their drugs? Other high schoolers. I knew the largest crack supplier in the county. She was 17. Out of the whole ring of dealers I was aware of, nobody was over 25. Don't tell me dealers don't sell to kids.

      Sorry you went to a shitty high school. At mine the chain always ended at some bad-ass 40 year old from a biker gang.

      >Yes, from the standpoint of they are both illegal and unethical. That's all that I was trying to say.

      So, it was illegal and unethical for me, as a Canadian, to have an interest in American TV? I put it to you that when I was pirating DirecTV last year at this time it was neither.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Forced by _fuzz_ · · Score: 1
      you can do anything you want to, if you put your mind to it.

      If that's the case, then why do people need to pirate Windows to get a job as you suggested before?

      So, it was illegal and unethical for me, as a Canadian, to have an interest in American TV? I put it to you that when I was pirating DirecTV last year at this time it was neither.

      You can have an interest in whatever the heck you want; there are no laws against that. Pirating satellite TV is probably illegal, even if you're in Canada, and definitely unethical.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    13. Re:Forced by shepd · · Score: 1

      >If that's the case, then why do people need to pirate Windows to get a job as you suggested before?

      Because the want the same "leg-up" that everyone else has. Perhaps need is too strong a word.

      >You can have an interest in whatever the heck you want; there are no laws against that. Pirating satellite TV is probably illegal, even if you're in Canada, and definitely unethical.

      You can consider it unethical. I don't.

      Here's the law at the time:

      9. (1) No person shall
      (a) knowingly send, transmit or cause to be sent or transmitted any false or fraudulent distress signal, message, call or radiogram of any kind;
      (b) without lawful excuse, interfere with or obstruct any radiocommunication;
      (c) decode an encrypted subscription programming signal or encrypted network feed otherwise than under and in accordance with an authorization from the lawful distributor of the signal or feed;
      (d) operate a radio apparatus so as to receive an encrypted subscription programming signal or encrypted network feed that has been decoded in contravention of paragraph (c); or
      (e) retransmit to the public an encrypted subscription programming signal or encrypted network feed that has been decoded in contravention of paragraph (c).


      At the time, as you can see, you were required to be a lawful distributor to have protection against having your signal hacked. DirecTV/Dishnetwork/whoever were not lawful in Canada, and therefore not protected by this legislation.

      BTW: I can't do that anymore because the Supreme Court redefined the definition of lawful (only in Canada can the Supreme Court basically re-write a law -- So lame, it's beyond definition) to mean anything that is lawful in any country. Technically that means that if sealand beams a pirated, but encrypted, signal to Canada, Canadian citizens wouldn't be able to legally turn them in. :-)

      >You can have an interest in whatever the heck you want; there are no laws against that.

      Yes, there are. That's the problem. It is illegal for me to watch TV with too low an amount of Canadian content in Canada.

      BTW: During the time it was legal to pirate American TV, it was still illegal to pay for it. So, is it unethical for me to have an interest in foreign cultures, in free speech? That's the real question you have to ask yourself.

      Piracy isn't always unethical.

      What really grates my nerves is that Free Speech TV is outlawed. Isn't that a twisted way for a government to operate!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  72. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That was stupid.

  73. what to do by Erris · · Score: 1
    What do i do ?

    You realize another chunk has fallen out of the M$ damb. How many electronic component makers are going to start considering Linux drivers over this? Chances are, they already have the drivers ready.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:what to do by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      How many electronic component makers are going to start considering Linux drivers over this? Chances are, they already have the drivers ready.

      Yes, but do they have Linux drivers for my RS/6000 box? It's PowerPC, and it has PCI and ISA slots. Where the HELL are the WinModem drivers for it??

      heh.

  74. Russian Matrjoshka clippy. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will be more annoying the US version. If you click on him he will spilt open and out will come out a smalller one. Click on him - same thing.

    Vertial Matrojshka clippy.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Russian Matrjoshka clippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you."
      Thats similar to the liberal creedo (defined through actions). We believe in free speech for all, except those we disagree with. We believe in tolerance for all, except for those that we label "have none". Ahh, sweet hypocricy

  75. Westside too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on the Westside.

    I eat babies.

  76. the hypocrisy of this claim by lseltzer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>the citizens were forced to obtain pirated copies due to the high cost and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need.

    How many people really NEED MS Office applications? Literally nobody. You can't claim on the one hand that Office applications suck and the alternatives are better and on the other that people can't stop using them. You can't claim on the one hand that nobody uses anything more than the simplest features and on the other that the file formats are a big problem, since the file formats for basic Office docs are well understood.

    The truth here is that people used pirated copies because they didn't want to pay the price Microsoft asked. They're thieves.

    1. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How many people really NEED MS Office applications?"

      everybody who would couldn't get a job/contract unless they had them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by karlm · · Score: 1

      Not thieves. Not murderous pirates on the high seas. Copyright infringers. There are big differences. Speeding isn't breaking and entering or manslaughter. Copyright infringement isn't thievery or piracy.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    3. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The fact that MS agreed to cut prices and unbundle the software indicates that the price they were originally asking was probably not reasonable.

    4. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      The truth here is that people used pirated copies because they didn't want to pay the price Microsoft asked. They're thieves.

      What if Microsoft charged an arm and a leg for their software? And had a corner on the market?

      Wouldn't that make Microsoft thieves?

    5. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      How can they have a corner on the market? Are Taiwanese not allowed to use Word Perfect? Or StarOffice?

      Nobody has ever been forced to use a Microsoft product.

    6. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There are a shocking number of jobs available for which even running water and electricity are not needed.

    7. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me put it this way (yeah, so I'm a software piracy apologist.. whatever)

      Average wage of a worker: >20k USD (heck, in some countries, its barely one THOUSAND US an year.. How many people use Staroffice, How many people use MS Office ? (98% vs 2% ? yeah, something like that)..

      So, what you're saying is, if most of the offices work with MS Office, and if you cant afford to buy a license to figure out how it works, then you're not going to get a job.. its that simple.. and that means that those who are less advantaged wont even be able to compete..

      On OSS alternatives: hey, do you know what internet access costs in places where per capita GDP is low ? we dont have broadband connections, and even leased lines give only slightly better speeds than dialup.. I dont run Linux on my home machine (I dont want to spend my paycheck on telephone charges) simply because I dont have the bandwidth to be running to rpmfind and downloading something each time I need to install free software..

      When I can afford it, I will buy my software, just like everyone else.. but until that time, if I have an alternative between waiting 10 days to download a free (as in beer) piece of software that may or may not do what I want vs running out to one of the Comp alleys and buying a CD with the commercial equivalent (which is what I have to figure out anyway), which do you think I will pick ?

      Sorry about the rant.. but while I do see the point of people cracking down on piracy, and they should, I remember that I started learning about computers on software that was pirated.. and I may not even have become a software person if it hadnt been for that..(Heck, I cant think of many in this country who could have afforded Visual C++ at that time..)

    8. Re:the hypocrisy of this claim by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      How can they have a corner on the market?

      Perhaps you have not been paying attention...Microsoft has a monopoly.

      According to U.S. courts, they not only have a monopoly, they've (ab)used their monopoly to get an unfair advantage over the competition.

      If this is news to you, you are either quite ignorant, or a Microsoft shill. Or both.

  77. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only if you can catch my snatch

  78. They are.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Piraty Pirates!

  79. The Republic of China... by UrGeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...are a people who have more than the usual reason to appreciate freedom. Congratulations to them for standing up to the Copyright Nazi's and Robber Barons of the U.S. I.P. Mafia.

  80. Piracy?!! Stop using that word! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Piracy IS THE HIJACKING OF VESSELS IN THE HIGH SEAS.
    The only reason for calling copying
    "piracy" is to be compliant with
    section 8
    and be able to enforce strict uniform penalties.
    To fit that into federal laws the lawyers put
    that name to trick people.

    1. Re:Piracy?!! Stop using that word! by WetCat · · Score: 1

      What happens if somebody names deletion of files
      as "murder" and try to enforce laws on murder on people that delete files?

  81. What's the point . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?"

    of creating great open source aps like Open Office, when people like you are too lazy to even do some research and discover their existence. Or maybe that's fine, since you are obviously too lazy to report bugs or add features, there is no loss to the community.

    Open source IS the end-all be-all of software, just not for lazy people like you that need to be told what to buy. I find it ironic that you waste your time at a forum so closely modeled after Open Source.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:What's the point . . . by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Open Source is the be-all-end-all of software for those with an infinite amount of time, patience, and lack of a life. My short time on this planet is valuable, thus I'd rather not spend it trying to figure out how to use some boring piece of software. I'd much rather buy software than waste time.

    2. Re:What's the point . . . by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Funny. That was my original motivation for dispensing with WinDOS. While Linux may (or may not) require a little more overhead in the beginning, it is less of a bother over time.

      Once X is up and running, it's all a wash anyways.

      WIMP works equally well regardless of the brand name.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:What's the point . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

      "infinite amount of time, patience, and lack of a life."

      Maybe, but it is also the best and most direct way to learn all about computers. If that is a waste of time to you, by all means let someone else do the thinking there for you (though, I think you could end up saving more time than you give once you start understanding how things work . . . but I am pretty biased towards the perceived benefits of education).

      I think you have just described a basic human condition in that the things worth learning seem to take an infinite amount of time, require patience, and make you appear to not have a life to those without the same interests as you.

      However, our world would be in pretty bad shape if a significant number of individuals didn't obstain from "instant gratification" in order to better themselves and the community they live in, perhap reaping even better rewards further down the road.

      All lives ARE short, but if you don't waste it doing SOMETHING significant, you are definitely wasting it.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    4. Re:What's the point . . . by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Your assumption is that everyone should learn how computers work. That's ridiculous. That's borderign on insane. That's like me saying that everyone should know the ins and outs of HVAC just because everyone has an air conditioner. I have interests in things other than computers, and I don't want to waste time doing something as boring as trying to figure out how to get my computer to recognize my network card. I spend time learning plenty... just not arbitrary shit that has no value to me. I'd MUCH rather pay someone else to worry about that (and my heat pump/AC) so that I can spend time doing things that matter to me. To me, spending a week getting a computer running properly, and many more months learning the intracacies of compiling kernels is a complete waste of time. To me, $1000 in software to run my business is a tiny price to pay to avoid having to spend months learning about the damned computer, which while important, is not my business.

    5. Re:What's the point . . . by mdew · · Score: 0

      your website sucks, "here give us you email address, so we can spam you later". If you're gonna provide FREE porn, do so, no strings attached lamer.

      --
      http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/
    6. Re:What's the point . . . by NineNine · · Score: 1

      And I'm going to pay for bandwidth how, exactly?

  82. another discount? by Artifex · · Score: 1
    I was once forced by pirates to use Microsoft software. Will that get me any sort of discount?
    ...but I've already discounted your story....

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  83. I was forced to copy some stuff against the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No money and a dead Win95 disk and since it was past 5 year old they would not replace or even allow a update(the upgrade price was just inside what I could pay). So guess what geting a copy from some who was prepard to copy a operating system to keep working.

  84. BS by melted · · Score: 1

    >> and having to buy software they did not need to get the parts they DID need

    That's not because a pirated version of MS office is available for $2 there, not at all!!!

  85. "forced" to pirate software? by monique · · Score: 1

    If MS products are overpriced or bundled in obnoxious ways, how does that "force" me to pirate?

    Starbucks coffee is pretty expensive. That doesn't "force" me to steal cups of coffee. If I choose to steal a cup of coffee, that is my decision, not the inevitable result of their high prices.

    Hey, I hate MS as much as the next person, but I still believe that I'm in control of my own actions.

    --
    -monique
    1. Re:"forced" to pirate software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This I agree, just because something cost more that does not mean we should start pirating them.

      Innovation takes place when people start finding alternative tools, not when they start pirating stuff...

    2. Re:"forced" to pirate software? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your argument is naieve to the point of dishonesty.

      Starbucks does not conspire to, nor is it unwillingly subject to, any forces that would create artificial need for it's product. Starbucks is also not a confirmed abusive monopolist that specifically manipulates such forces.

      Buying from Joe's Java Shack doesn't affect your ability to interact with Starbuck's customers, nor does it prevent you from gaining use of other similar products in the marketplace.

      IOW, software is not a physical commodity. Armchair moralists should not argue as if it were.

      Don't like stealing? Then try some honesty.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:"forced" to pirate software? by monique · · Score: 1

      It may be convenient to use MS products, but it is not a need. If I cannot afford (or choose not to spend money on) these products, no one is forcing me to use them. There is no gun to my head or the heads of my loved ones. It is still a choice. I need food. I need shelter. I need medical attention. I do not need a computer, let alone an application.

      Don't try to rip away my autonomy or yours. We all make choices in life. If I choose to use software without the permission of the distributor, it is exactly that -- a choice. I'm not even telling you whether it's right or wrong -- it's a decision based on your personal beliefs and tolerance for the possiblity of jail time. But it's still a decision.

      You're mixing two arguments -- ability to interoperate and the non-material nature of software. What if the product in question were a particular piece of hardware? Only one company produces it, and many of your customers use it. The property of "affecting your ability to interact with Starbuck's customers" is not one that exclusively applies to software, so your use of "in other words" is simply an attempt to gloss over your lack of ability to connect the first argument to the second.

      --
      -monique
    4. Re:"forced" to pirate software? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you don't buy Microsoft software, other people are unwilling or unable to exchange information with you. If you can't or wont buy this software, you are relegated to the effective status of an Information Pariah.

      It's as simple as that.

      You have the choice of "not buying" or "being Amish".

      That is no choice at all.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:"forced" to pirate software? by flacco · · Score: 1
      You have the choice of "not buying" or "being Amish".

      You also have the opportunity of playing an educational role by simply ask that people send you information in a non-proprietary format.

      And by sending them information in a non-proprietary format as well.

      There are a lot of "power users" who have a vague understanding of this whole "microsoft monopoly" issue but haven't encountered it in the real world for themselves yet. A polite request that someone send you something in non-proprietary format immediately makes the issue non-abstract to them.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  86. $400, but for what?!?!? by XJoshX · · Score: 2, Interesting


    It should be obvious to most people that the price demanded by microsoft is far to high for what you get. Office is ~$400 for five or six programs.. These programs were not that complex in the first place. I know I'd much rather program a program like Word then some of the harder parts of the Windows OS ( ~$150).. Add onto this that the programs in the suite haven't been changed by much in the last 10 years.

    If I was running a company, it would seem quite obvious that I could have my employees do exactly the same things with OpenOffice (free) or Corel Office (much less $$ than MS) and my company could save hundreds of dollars per employee.

  87. Ahhh... the power of friends... by tepp · · Score: 1

    What ARE you guys complaining about? Windows XP Professional only cost me 30$! Office XP only cost me 60$... ... at the microsoft employee store....

    *yay friends who are ex-employees of microsoft* :)

    Now while I am a spoiled brat who happily takes advantage of people who Microsoft has unfairly fired (long story), I know I do choose to buy legit copies of the software when the prices are "reasonable".

    I do seriously believe, that if they could offer JUST Word for under 50$, students would buy it. Why do you think so many students used Microsoft Works? Because it has/had a student discount at the university store and was cheap. I just did a pricecheck - Microsoft Works 2003 costs 68$ at Cnet. Add in the student rebate (I am assuming there still is one, I am no longer a student), and a student can start to justify a 40-50$ software purchase of Word.

    Cnet's review of Microsoft Works 2003 here

    It's Word 2003, with a few unnecessary "helper" apps.

    --
    Tepp
  88. Troll of the Month. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice one.

  89. We can afford it?!? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1
    Gee, I wish I was made out of money like you. I don't have the cash to fork out a few hundred dollars for Office or the $99 for an "upgrade" to my operating system.

    No matter what country you live in, MS prices are too high for the little guy.

  90. THOU DOST FAIL IT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you FAIL it harder than most, pillow-biter

    1. Re:THOU DOST FAIL IT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the YOU FAIL IT!!! troll is still funny to me.

  91. Russia first to see microsoft source.,.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that one part of the russians being the first to take advantage of the Microsoft source code initiative to be helarous. Wasn't it they who "aquired" that source anyway last year in that famous breach?! :) So, I guess, after their "self help", why not make them first?

  92. No - it does NOT read .doc files fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop modding the parent up, you retarded moderators. There have been several examples showing that Open Office does not read .doc files fine.

    It's rather pitiful at it, really. If you're sharing documents that just have basic formatting and no tables, maybe, but if that's the case then save yourself some application load time and just save them as plain text files with a text editor.

    sheesh

  93. MS shares windoz code with IRAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates : Saddam u look peachy

  94. oh come on now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the submitters pathetic excuse only arms those who wish to restrict fair use and competition. Please remove yourself from the gene pool, now. What I really don't get is how people can not see that the very justifications, ahem... reasons that are given as to why many resorted to piracy is the same line of reasoning behind any stupid id driven quest to infringe upon the rights of others. Furthermore it sends a clear message that MS products are obviously superior and thus in high demand when what the real response would be to find what people want and then provide an alternative.

    Just admit it... these people resorted to piracy of items that were for them luxury ("toys") or at least not even remotely necessary for basic survival and living. Its the same as when some "oppressed" idiot wearing pants around hanging down to his knees steals DVD players, CD's and stereo equipment. That crap isn't to feed him or his family nor is it to provide through sales such necessary items to live. Nope, that idiot there dressed like a clown is just a greedy, oxygen wasting sack of sewer floating shit. Those that justify his action are of the same mentality as you and I am willing to be that it all stems from a self loathing/guilt trip that is firmly in place simply because you too have no ethics or principles. People without principles are ALWAYS the first to use one hand to fight off anyone they perceive as stopping or judging them when it comes to their hypocritical infringement upon the rights and property of others... yet then use the otherhand perhaps even with more mindless zeal, to actually be themselves stealing and infringing upon others.

    Don't like it, don't buy it. Like it? Then be willing to pay the price. Until that day I will no more listen to brainless drivel from toads like you than I would if you replaced "Microsoft Software" with "Big Screen TV" or "Fancy Sports Car."

    1. Re:oh come on now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow..Penis small enough?

  95. Who would not be upset over 99% profit markups? by bkontr · · Score: 1

    99% percent?? How did I come up with that you ask?

    86% profit markup here in the US

    +

    13% profit markup over North American prices (according to Taipei Times)

    =99%

    That's without mentioning the software bundling issue which forces unwanted software on customers.

    --


    "You helped our nation celebrate its bicentennial in 17 -- 1976." --George W. Bush, to Queen Elizabeth, Wash
  96. not the latest version by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you haven't tried the latest version yet, which allows you to bring up the component tools individually.

  97. Ever hear of a Re-Call???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my older Accord has a defect then the car manufacturer is required to FIX his defective products even when years have passed, if it is determined to be an engineering issue. He is also required to inform me of the problem, that is where your comparison fails.

    1. Re:Ever hear of a Re-Call???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft already released bugfixes for their OS. The difference between the various versions of Windows is not merely bugfixes (although those are include with them), but added features (whether good or bad). Just because there is a version that includes bugfixes and added features doesn't mean you're entitled to it. You're only entitled to the bugfixes.

      Of course, I use free software so it doesn't really apply to me anway.

  98. i think you missed some commas by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Basic survival necessities: Food, Water, Windows Shelter, Slashdot

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  99. Quote Piracy Unquote by lateralus · · Score: 1

    Software Quote Piracy Unquote is an interesting subject. There is no such thing. When I perform a copy I must obey the set of rules that govern copying. Copyright law is a set of rules that govern copying, but you already know that, or do you? Everyone keeps talking about this Quote Piracy Unquote thing that doesn't even exist.

    If anything at all I might be breaking a certain part of copyright law under certain conditions. The courts are there to decide if this is illegal. The law includes allot more than "pirated" and "unpirated".

    I'll give some examples of similar terms: Zealots, Trusted, Rights Management, Western and Intelligent. They are all over-simplified cop-outs that help us avoid the real issues and replace them with sensationalized crap.

    When you use a single word to describe an entire complex system of rules and the manner in which they are sometimes interpreted someone loses and someone else wins. Using "piracy" is alike to carrying a slogan. I'm not saying that you should or should not. Just try to realize who's dictionary does it come from, and to what end is it used.

    I've never committed Quote Piracy Unquote. All I've done is work within the system of copyright rules to the best of my knowledge and with my own best intention in mind.

    Avoidance of this term will in my humble opinion force people to try and rethink the subject.

    This subject is in dire need of rethinking.

    --
    If you outlaw the law, only criminals will have laws
  100. Over where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word costs $340 and Excel costs $320, but Office itself only costs $440. ... Even for just one component, you're far better off buying the bundle here in the US.

    I don't know where you're living, but over here in the US, $340 is less than $440, so if you only need one component, you're not better off buying the bundle.

  101. so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why this is even news. Nobody said that it is going to effect people outside of taiwan? But I guess this could be great news for consumers if it does.

    scoob
    www.rainbowportal.net developer

  102. Money money money by zCyl · · Score: 1

    A few hundred here, a few hundred there, sooner or later you're talking about real money. On the order of the purchase price of several desktop machines...

  103. Forced to steal? by SyFryer · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I bet this has a huge impact on the problem, I figure:

    If the users of the software are so poor they are 'Forced' to use pirate copies, then they are sure to read about the reduced cost option and uninstall the perfectly good pirate copy, and then go spend a couple of months wages on a legitimate version of the same thing.

    Yeah, right.

    Chances are, this is just a punt out to try and shift new versions of the software to reduce the interoperability between legitamate new software and thousands of times pirated versions of the same (read office 98 > office XP).

    If they can't afford the software, then how will they afford the hardware upgrade to run the new software?

  104. I never thought it was okay to pirate, but by izora · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) My last pc (purchased early 2001) shipped with Windows ME. Come on. What was I supposed to do with that? Had it been clearly marked "Unusable Operating System" I would have waited until XP was released before buying. As it was, I sure didn't feel much like shelling out more dough for yet another MS operating system --- and I don't think I should have had to.

    2) My dad bought MS's Streets & Maps (yeah, I know -- dad, did you ever heard of Mapquest?) and put it on his XP machine. Then he tried to install it on my mom's XP laptop. Which it choked because it already had gotten hooked into his machine, I guess contacting the M(other) S(hip) to tell them what he was doing. I don't think my dad should have to buy TWO versions of Streets & Maps for one household.

    But, these kinds of things backfire on a corporation. People eventually get sick of it, like they did in Taiwan. What goes around comes around, I guess it's Karma.

    --
    http://ob-la-blog.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:I never thought it was okay to pirate, but by SN74S181 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      did you ever heard of Mapquest?

      MapQuest is an internet service. It requires an internet connection to be of any use. Further, it's slow compared to the CDROM based mapping software like Streets and Trips. I like taking 'virtual drives' around the country using Streets and Trips because you can scroll the map sideways in any direction. You have a virtual map of the whole United States, and it scrolls fast.

      The online mapping options are pathetic in comparison.

    2. Re:I never thought it was okay to pirate, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, a redundant post. Not off-topic.

      See you in meta-mod, tardball.

  105. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information wants to be free!

    Got any good \/\/4rz3 sites?

  106. It's funny because it's true. by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For most people, security is not important. Top performance is not important. Optimum configuration is not important. Control is not important. Not having to power toggle is not important.

    Being able to put the CD in the CD drive, press a button a couple of times, reboot, and get what you want is VERY IMPORTANT. NOT THINKING is VERY IMPORTANT.

    Users want things that work like coffee machines. You plug it in and it works. If you want a different coffee machine, you get a different coffee machine and plug it in and it works. Windows makes computers a lot more like coffee machines than Linux does. Having to turn your computer on an off to get a new feature is much less of a problem than having to know what to type to get a new feature. Linux wants you to figure stuff out. Microsoft wants your money.

    For most people, giving up money is easier.

    1. Re:It's funny because it's true. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Well I consider the ease of use as a benefit. Its alot easier to setup windows with the correct versions of c++, perl, python and java for my college courseware.

      With Linux I have trouble with outdated c++ tools that do not support stl( gcc 2.9x) or I have to put up with distro's that are too bleeding edge and include perl 5.8, python 2.2x, and java 1.4x that are source incompatible with my courseware. I gave up with redhat 8 because not only did it include the too bleeding edge perl 5.8 but it also did not have mod perl support since it only came with apache 2.x. I was shocked that redhat did not have this on a second cd. Redhat 7.x had the original gcc 2.95x on the powertools cd if programmers complained of the 2.96rh version that came standard with the distro.

      With Windows I just point and click to install the correct software versions with no hassles and in a matter of hours I am working and not trying to configure my box. No dependancies hell.

      Users want stability and reliablity. Its just that their needs are only met with MS-Office and other assorted apps and these needs are more important then reliablity or security.

      MacOSX may be the correct ballance. Its so easy even a child could use and many argue it has the best UI ever developed. Apple funds hugs amounts of money in UI developments that target usability. They have rigid requirements for software vendors to meet to meet the UI specs. Its also powerfull because of its new Unix under pinnings. With the new PowerPC970 risc processors this fall I can't wait to switch.

    2. Re:It's funny because it's true. by JCholewa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > For most people, security is not important. Top performance is not
      > important. Optimum configuration is not important. Control is not
      > important. Not having to power toggle is not important.

      > Being able to put the CD in the CD drive, press a button a couple
      > of times, reboot,
      > and get what you want is VERY IMPORTANT. NOT THINKING is
      > VERY IMPORTANT.

      > Users want things that work like coffee machines. You plug it in
      > and it works. If you want a different coffee machine, you get
      > a different coffee machine and plug it in and it works. Windows
      > makes computers a lot more like coffee machines than Linux does.
      > Having to turn your computer on an off to get a new feature is much
      > less of a problem than having to know what to type to get a new
      > feature. Linux wants you to figure stuff out. Microsoft wants
      > your money.

      I'm not sure that I can entirely agree with you. I don't think that Windows is inherently easier to deal with. I think that the fact that Windows is by far the dominant operating system means that all hardware and nearly all software developers pay specific attention to how their products work with Windows. This isn't due to any particular feature of the operating system. It's simply because they have to make it easy on the popular platform.

      For most applications, installations go like this:
      * In Windows 2000, I'd open up my web browser of choice. Then I'd go to one of the download sites or perhaps to google.com, and I'd search for an application online. I'd download the application (usually going through a few screens of ad-laden BS and choosing various mirror that are closest to me. I'd go to the location of the file (either through Start->Run or using a file manager like PowerDesk or simply by using Opera's excellent download manager). Then I'd double-click on the file. A "wizard" application opens and asks me a series of successive questions about where it wants me to install the program, whether I agree to a fifty-page application-specific legal document, where in the Start Menu I want this thing to go, and whether I want shortcuts placed in various locations. Then the program (sometimes) tells me that it needs to reboot, and I hit "OK". It reboots, occasionally does some further installation, and then I'm set. I would do all this every time for each program.

      * In Mandrake Linux 9.0, I go to the package managing program (By clicking on "K->Configuration->Packaging->Install Software", or by hitting ALT-F2, typing "rpmdrake" and hitting ENTER). I change the little radio button group from "Mandrake choices" to "All Packages". I type a program name into the Search bar and hit the Search button (or I'd just look through the efficiently categorized list of programs). I check the checkboxes of any and all programs that I want to install, and I hit the Install button. Then I sit back as the installer automatically downloads, installs and configures all the applications I selected, grabbing any prerequisite programs from the servers automatically. In the time it took to search for, download and begin the installation of a program in Windows, I've finished installing the Linux app. Before I've finished mucking with the Next->Next->Next->Finish screen of that installation, another Linux app has finished installing (without me needing to click on anything more). By the time my computer has rebooted into Windows 2000 from that one install, the Mandrake Linux package manager has installed six or seven different apps (and I only had to click the "Install" button once). And you know what? Everything is installed into logical, well thought-out places. Instead of going into "Programs" and having to scroll down a clumsy list of company names to find the app you've installed (difficult especially if you've forgotten the company name!) like I see on Windows 2000, the Mandrake installer puts everything into intuitive, user-friendly subcategories. Stuff that uses the network is in "Networking". All my email programs are in "Networking->Mail". My news (usenet) readers (Pan for binary downloading, Mozilla Messenger for general reading) are in "Networking->News". Card games are specifically in "Amusement->Cards". Know what I have to do to find all my card games in Windows? I have to look in "Programs->Accessories->Games" and figure out which ones are card games. Then I have to look in every subgroup in Programs (the aforementioned company names) to check and see which ones have card games. I have to *memorize* this stuff in Windows. In Linux, I just go to "Amusement->Cards". Holy crap, you can't get any more obvious than that! Oh, I need to watch TV? "Multimedia->Video". I have to put this 800MB SVCD onto my 700MB CD without data loss? "Applications->Archiving->Cd Burning". I want my kid to learn stuff? "Applications->Edutainment". I'll never accidentally click on the "Hot Boobies" interactive porno game when I intended to show my female colleague my PG-rated "Hard Bodies" fitness management program. It just won't happen, because one of them would be in "Amusement->Sex" while the other would be found in ... well, I dunno, maybe "Office->Time Management" or "Applications->Sciences->Health" (probably the latter). In Windows, it's a crapshoot. Yeah, real user-friendly.

      It's better than that. If I want to be lazy in windows, I can set up links on the taskbar, Office Bar (if I spend the untold hundreds for their Office product) or desktop to the programs. I could also (with a non-native third-party extension program) map programs to a Win-key combination. Currently, in Windows, I use Win-O to open Opera, Win-M to open my Mail program (Eudora), Win-X to open eXcel, Win-W to open Word, and so forth. Mandrake natively supports key combinations to open programs, and I believe you can differentiate between the two Win keys if you had the desire (LeftWin+W goes to OpenOffice Writer, RightWin+W goes to KWord, for example). I don't use it much, for the following reasons: Mandrake (and, by the way, I'm using KDE to manage my gui, so ymmv if you use other programs) allows me to put links to programs on the desktop. It also allows me to put links to programs on my taskbar. But it lets me configure these links in interesting ways (and we're not talking about difficult configuration; we're talking about Right-click-on-panel->Size->Large and similarly easy means). I can have (and I do) two levels of bars with these links. I have a big taskbar with my extra-lazy application links. These are full-sized icons, so they're easy to click on when I'm too slothful to competently use the mouse. On the bar right above it, I have (among other things) medium-sized icons for a whole bunch of programs that I tend to frequently use, like my text editor and my web browser. Incidentally, that bar also has a dictionary bar, an ascii character picker (I could paste odd characters into any program instead of having to rely on some arcane, application specific "Insert->Character" features that don't work universally), a web news scroller, an advanced clipboard manager (you know how more recent versions of Microsoft Office allow for multiple clipboard levels? Well, KDE's Klipper application does this for *every app*) and quick shortcuts to lock the computer or to logout. But I don't every really use those icons very often. Why not? Well, I have session management turned on. Whenever I turn on my computer, the system reloads active programs so that I can continue from where I left off. And most of my programs (Opera, Konsole, Konqueror, Kate, Pan) have their own internal session management, so I don't have to click on bookmarks or whatever to get to where I was before. The other thing that makes it easy to not have to move my mouse to hit those "shortcut" icons is the nature of linux pathing. Remember when I installed those programs above? Well, the executables are automatically put into a place that's in the system path. Most of the programs have pretty short filenames for the binaries. Most of the time, if I want to run the program and happen to remember the program's executable name, I hit F2, type in the program name and hit ENTER. F2,pan,ENTER. F2,mozilla,ENTER. F2,kate,ENTER. Heck, even those programs that I installed through other means than the Mandrake Package Manager (sometimes, you can install the very latest versions of programs before they get packaged) will work with this. F2,gmplayer,ENTER runs the GUI version of MPlayer, the only multimedia program that can play just about every format out there, from mpeg to avi to asf to quicktime to rm to ogg to DVDs and Mode 2 SVCDs (which I *almost* have working in windows, with some occasional bizarre inconsistencies). I have to have three or four different players installed on Windows 2000 to get that sort of compatibility, and that's ignoring the easier interface and hotkeys in MPlayer.

      The hardware side is sometimes easier in Windows, though my experience doesn't exactly completely agree with that. I have a somewhat generic 5.1 sound card with no discernable markings on it. It took me *forever* to find the drivers for Windows 2000, and it was actually Linux (and its "harddrake" hardware manager) that gave me enough clues about the main chips on this soundcard to find out that it was from some C-Media company or something like that. Some time after, I found the Windows drivers and everything went swimmingly. Know how much I had to look for the Linux drivers? They were already there. They. Were. Already. There. When I installed Mandrake 9.0, the sound card was autodetected and autoconfigured. I'll give you that an earlier version of Mandrake (8.1 or 8.2) didn't properly detect the card when I first installed it, but the drivers for it were in there and it was comparatively trivial to tell the computer this (I put the name of the sound card driver module, something like cmpci.so, into some configuration startup text file) compared to the herculean effort to get it running in Win2k.

      My TV card used to be an outdated Hauppauge that didn't support scaling past 640x480. I had to guess which drivers it used from Hauppauge.com, and I was eventually successful in Windows 2000. The scaling thing was annoying, but it worked, except that the video capture seemed problematic. A few months later, Win2k went crappy on me, and I had to reinstall it. For the life of me, I could not remember which drivers and in which order I needed to install, and I couldn't get the TV program to work, no matter how hard I tried. So I did it in Linux. The Mandrake 8.x install autodetected, autoinstalled, autoconfigured. And it installed a whole wad of different TV programs that could use the TV card. One of them (xawtv) could inexplicably scale the TV screen to whatever dimension I wanted. I still use that program.

      Heck, this past Christmas, my parents bought me an All-in-Wonder RADEON 8500. The installs worked fine on both systems. Unfortunately, I only have a choice of one TV program on Windows, and that program makes the system crash after I try to shut it down. I still have the exact same vareity of TV programs on Linux, and if I wanted to use my brain, I could probably pretty easily figure out how to broadcast the TV image onto my local network.

      The USB CD burner that I recently gave up was fun. When I installed it in Windows, the Windows Media Player tried to autoinstall a "CD Burning Plugin" which caused all my CD drives (even the CD-ROM) to disappear (until I got all technical and figured out how to remove the stupid plugin). Mandrake 9 (and 8.2, I think) just installed it. No fuss. It worked on installation.

      I think that my newly installed ATAPI burner is easier to install in Windows, but that's because (as I mentioned above) Windows gets the third-party support. I did have to change two or three text files (though I didn't need any installation program) to get this burner working in Linux. I haven't really tested the burner in Win2k, primarily because process management in 2k is sloppy. If I wanted to burn at the maximum speed, I'd have to close *everything* to avoid buffer underruns in Windows. In Linux, I'm simultaneously downloading from usenet, unRARing 800MB mpegs, viewing SVCDs from my CD-ROM drive and browsing the internet. It gives me a little trouble if I -- on top of all that -- run a particularly intensive parity checking program, but I think that this is on the whole better than having to avoid *breathing* lest Windows get cranky and reduce my CD-R media to useless silvery powder.

      Granted, linux does have some usability drawbacks. Moving drives around is a big no-no unless you're a learned user. My system forgot where that ATAPI burner went when I recently rearranged some devices. I fixed that in under ten minutes, but it felt like the end of the world before I figured out what was going on. I can't get my Gyration gyroscopic mouse working properly in Linux (I've gotten it to the point that it takes *some* input from this device, but said input is completely incoherent and unmouselike). That one is due to the third-party effect, but it's still tremendously annoying. Games aren't as developed, of course, but that's not really a usability issue.

      Damnit, doing things that I *need* to do, system-wise, is totally trivial in Linux. My Millennium II and Marvel G200 half a decade ago could zoom in with a hotkey in Windows, but I haven't been able to do that for years now since that feature is driver-dependent in Windows. Linux does this no matter what video card you have. This is set up intuitively in Mandrake's "please select the screen sizes you want available" install. These aren't things that you should have to reconfigure every time you get a new piece of hardware.

      Aaargh, I'm sorry. This has turned into just a straight rant. I know that different people have different habits, but my own personal experience is that Linux is *easier* and requires *less thinking* unless you *want* to be an advanced user, in which case it seems happy to give you the power to be advanced. I can finally do things that maximize my personal productivity. In most cases, hardware and software just works, instead of just works until the blue screen appears. That may be overly mean to Microsoft, and I readily admit that several of their programs are top notch (I've loved products from them going all the way back to Decathlon, a game that Microsoft made for non-Microsoft operating systems!). Excel is great. Access seems strong. I'm told that the "Ages of..." series is phenomenal. MS-DOS Edit was a fantastic MDI editor (and boy was I disappointed when they downgraded to Notepad and Wordpad!). Media Player (well, using the Classic skin since the more recent interfaces have been very clunky) is usually fantastic. But it's still my opinion that Windows isn't inherently easier. The thing that is easier for users is the fact that nearly every company in the universe tailors their hardware and software to work best with Windows. I mean, wouldn't Dodge look unbelievably superior if 95% of body shops only did work on Dodge vehicles?

      Eh, I'm done complaining. I may have made it sound like Linux is infinitely superior to Windows, but I was mostly overreacting to what I consider an equally extremist (but opposite) viewpoint. Windows 2000 is "good enough" for me. If there were no Linux, I could probably be comfortable using Windows 2000 for the rest of my life. Unlike the nightmare that was Windows 98, I can usually get Win2k to listen to me in a reasonably reliable manner. I use Linux largely because it prevents the need for me, a poor guy, to steal computer programs from P2P networks. I use free (and Free) software on Linux, and the very knowledge that people do these things to benefit others and not just to win a buck both makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside and compels me to be similarly generous with my gradually expanding coding knowledge.

      BTW, there is one area where I will be stubborn: Qt beats any OS-specific class/widget programming package ever. I love, love, LOVE being able to develop and compile applications for Windows, Linux, OS/X, various unix variants and a couple PDAs using OS-native widget sets on a single codebase. So pbbbbllllt! ;)

      Note: Hey, neat, I just discovered that I can drag
      copied text to my desktop background and it'll
      automatically paste it into a new text file. That's rather useful.

      -JC

    3. Re:It's funny because it's true. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Users want things that work like coffee machines. You plug it in and it works. If you want a different coffee machine, you get a different coffee machine and plug it in and it works. Windows makes computers a lot more like coffee machines than Linux does...

      I don't agree. Firstly, I doubt you have ever seen a typical user operate a coffee machine. They never get the mix right, folks will forget to grind the beans, put in too much water, or forget to put in any water at all. (Well, at least until the Fire Department arrives.) People don't put the filters in, there are a number of failure modes for your everyday coffee pot.

      Secondly, to the average user for Linux they have:

      • A login screen
      • A start menu
      • An icon on their desk to put files in
      • A set of icons in the menu and on the desktop to open all of the programs they need.

      Windows gives you the whole damn computer at your finger tips. When acclimating a new user, the first thing I have to tell them is: ignore this icon, that folder, this message window, and don't save files here here here here or here.

      Now mind you, this is a corporate work environment. We have a team of entirely undertrained overworked people who don't know a thing about linux. I gave them a disk that boots the computer off the network, runs through an automated install sequence, and 20 minutes later you have a working computer.

      Nothing like that exists for Windows.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:It's funny because it's true. by bpeck · · Score: 1


      Actually to make decent coffee you wouldn't just plug in a coffee machine and go.

      You would buy whole beans. You would grind them just before you were to brew. Use a rotating blade for drip coffee and and a proper grinder for espresso. I prefer non burnt beans myself. and of course you would use a caraffe (sp?) not a heated coffee pot.

      So for a decent cup of coffee its not simply plug and play. If you want to drink crap then yes.. Windows XP will work fine. ;-)

    5. Re:It's funny because it's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. My father-in-law's gf figured i owed her a new dial-up modem 'cause she could only connect to the intenet sometimes, not all time with it, after I failed to set up a dsl modem.
      The average computer user wants windows 'cause they don't know anything about computers. They don't want to know anything about computers. They want to install games and video software and surf the internet.

  107. Actually thy have changed. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Just enough so its impossible to open newer documents on an older system, and to make sure that anything you learned how to do is useless on the new verson. Im not even talking programming here, people, were talking pulldown menus and basic functions that have been "improved" to the point that long time users cant get it to work.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  108. Re:Robin Hood by duncan+bayne · · Score: 1

    It's disgusting isn't it? I'm heartily fed up with people who claim they were 'forced' to buy Microsoft products - I haven't seen any MS employees wandering around computer stores with assault rifles, threatening me with harm or death if I don't.

    It's a simple cost-benefit analysis - if the value of using Microsoft products outweighs the value of not using Microsoft products, then people will use them. If not, they won't, and if they're immoral thieves, they'll use those products without permission.

    Personally, I'd answer software pirates employing the 'force' defense in the same way I'd answer someone defending his theft of my motorcycle by claiming he was 'forced' into it by the retail price of bikes - jail the fucker, and give him a good kicking before the police arrive.

  109. Taiwan AIN'T China, Dolt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn your geography, fool. In spite of the commies laying claim to Taiwan, it's not a part of the mainland and has a democratically elected government, issues it's own stamps, monies, and passports.

  110. Re:I thought Kdevelop and g++ were free to everybo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya it's all about the free beer after all.

  111. Over regulation? by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

    I don't get this. Why should the government fiddle with prices? If the software is too expensive, don't buy it. Use open office, star office, word perfect, heck, use MS Works, whatever. If it's worth the $400, buy it. If it's not, don't buy it. As soon as the government starts controlling company prices, it's one step towards communism.

    Isn't it like saying "I'd love a ferrari but I can't afford one so the government should regulate to make it cheaper". If it's not worth the $50,000 to me, then don't buy it. It's not like we are talking about food, water or shelter here (things essential to life, and therefore can arguably use some regulation).

    There is no excuse for piracy. There are free alternatives. If it's such a big problem for taiwan, they should spend their time promoting the free alternatives.

    1. Re:Over regulation? by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Serious question: DO you think the government should have any role in capitalism at all?

      Should the government make efforts to keep the playing field level (e.g. anti-monopoly laws) or just let the market run its course?

      I think the reason the government gets involved in these things is because: Capitalism tends towards monopoly, and monopoly harms the consumer. The government has a stated goal of keeping its citizens from getting harmed, so the government gets involved and tries to keep monopolies from abusing that monopoly power.

      It's a messy process, and I'm not so sure that our government really has the "little guy" in mind any more when it intervenes...

  112. 3 bucks for a copy of legit MS WORD in Taiwan by Sexy+Commando · · Score: 1

    I've heard that a few years ago, Microsoft had a special version of Word that was available in every 7-Elevens in Taiwan for only 3 bucks USD. The only limitation is taht the software disallows you to edit one single document beyond 10,000 words. I don't know if they still have those.

  113. Chinese Immorality: Software Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The triad of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and mainland China is the software-piracy capital of the world. Most Chinese simply believe that stealing software (and anythnig else) is morally acceptable.

    Instead of cutting prices, Microsoft should have maintained prices that are comparable to those in the USA. To handle the issue of software piracy, Microsoft should simply build and distribute, for free, special versions of its software infected with destructive viruses. Then, people who use pirated software will be in for a rude but humorous surprise when a deadly version of Windows XP deletes all the data from the engineering workstation, medical database in an intensive care unit of a hospital, etc. Imagine a Chinese nuclear missile blowing up suddenly because of data that has been altered by a virus-infected version of Windows XP.

    The Chinese are morally bankrupt and need to learn a valuable lesson in Western ethics.

  114. Wow does this deal by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
    Taiwan had a GDP per capita (at purchasing power parity) of 22,676 in 2001

    But per capita GDP is not the same as per capita income. In 2000, workforce (that is, only those actually working) per capita income in Taiwan, excluding Taipei, was less that $15,000. I know only a small handful of folks (and because my business is education my circle of friends includes government employees, college professors, doctors and other educated elite) who bring home $US22,000 a year. Most years, even I barely clear that, I and make more money than almost anybody else I know.

    Lee Kaiwen,
    Taiwan, ROC

    1. Re:Wow does this deal by edgezone · · Score: 1
      Taiwan had a GDP per capita (at purchasing power parity) of 22,676 in 2001


      But per capita GDP is not the same as per capita income. In 2000, workforce (that is, only those actually working) per capita income in Taiwan, excluding Taipei, was less that $15,000. I know only a small handful of folks (and because my business is education my circle of friends includes government employees, college professors, doctors and other educated elite) who bring home $US22,000 a year. Most years, even I barely clear that, I and make more money than almost anybody else I know.


      Just as a point of clarification, I added in the purchasing power parity to try to balance out the figures. For those who don't know what it is (which I didn't until I took a quick peak at some stats info), it takes into account the differences in cost of living, adjusted to the US. In other words, @ppp tries to even up the cost based on buying a years worth of groceries, a home stereo, and misc other things even though the actual numbers will differ (at least as far as I understood it, any economists out there are free to correct me and smack me upside the head with a day old salmon if I'm off the mark). Just clarifying that I wasn't saying that taiwanese make $US22K, the actual figure was around $US12,000, which is probably more in line with your experiences. I simply wanted to try evening up the figures for comparing the price of Microsoft products (per the thread).
      --
      -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    2. Re:Wow does this deal by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
      The problem is, Microsoft tries to maintain consistent prices worldwide -- unadjusted for GDP per capita, or any other numbers. In fact, price comparisons I've done recently suggest that Microsoft's SRP is actually higher in Taiwan than the US (Office XP, for example, selling for $US419 here compared to $US379).

      The result is that Microsoft's prices are firmly out of reach in a country whose GDP per capita is less than half that of the US. Combined with ballpark 20 percent lower hardware prices in Taiwan makes MS's percentage of system cost -- well, unjustified is the best word I can think of.

      So who's to blame?

      Lee Kaiwen,
      Taiwan, ROC

  115. Re:Chinese Immorality: Software Piracy by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Microsoft should simply build and distribute, for free, special versions of its software infected with destructive viruses. Then, people who use pirated software will be in for a rude but humorous surprise when a deadly version of Windows XP deletes all the data from the engineering workstation, medical database in an intensive care unit of a hospital, etc. Imagine a Chinese nuclear missile blowing up suddenly because of data that has been altered by a virus-infected version of Windows XP. "

    You just described the US version of Windows XP.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  116. Re:Chinese Immorality: Software Piracy by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
    The triad of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and mainland China is the software-piracy capital of the world.

    [Chuckle] This guy's obviously never been to Southeast Asia.

    Lee Kaiwen,
    Taiwan, ROC

  117. No story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Office XP, 2000, 97, and 95 have been available unbundled in the US (and probably available via online purchases) for as long as I can remember

    Take a look
    http://www.savonsoft.com/products/msw2k2.htm l

    I think there is still an opium problem in China ...

  118. For Those Who haven't seen it... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    That was at the beginning of the DVD (version I saw) if Monty Python: The Meaning of Life.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:For Those Who haven't seen it... by Hellraisr · · Score: 1

      Yup that is what I was referring to. A great scene :) But I couldn't remember which of the Python movies it was.

  119. "arm chair moralists"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think you just bastardized that actual saying. When someone is in the thick of it like everyone else then that is not a correct cliche to use.

    Furthermore, your response instead of being informative is a hateful emotional response that says much about your own ethos and morals.

    You are right about abusive and monopolizing methods by MS yet when you must run to big brother that is also a sign of a lack of personal initiative. Go out and buy or freely download any other alternatives. Every day those alternatives are more accepted because some people are finally waking up to the fact that it is their CHOICES that in turn give or take power away from entities like Microsoft.

    I pity you, if only that you are so close to being a thinking person but have let your internal hatred run your life. However, you do seem a bit confused about the ideas of honesty so I guess no one should be surprised at your confusion in other applied principles.

    However, I will refrain from an analogy since you might pick it apart regardless at the expense of the reality it was menat to model a portion of. I hope you don't ever get wrongly diagnosed because of a "shoot from the hip" reaction by a doctor. "Yep, you seem to have terminal brain cancer due to that fever and slowed muscle reaction you've got there!"

    Amazing how some people get SOOOO uptight and even border on violence when someone else is acting by their principles. Every lame excuse and justification is spewed even to the point that people will attack that person as if they had somehow wronged them. This overactive ID that society has is a sign of impending disaster as an internal utilitarian mind is unfit to deal with the reality that they will one day have to themselves live with being the victim of someone else's confusion of "wants" vs. "needs."

  120. I don't have a problem interacting w/o MS crapware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing in the world is a self righteous, angst ridden person who's problems stem from ignorance, because a solution is at hand. The opposite end of this contains the fools who really are nothing but oxygen thieves anyway. Thinking is a right and a priveledge, try it sometime.

  121. in their best interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even with "academic evals" which mean that anyone not in a particular school in a particular college does not get to play along, the prices are still a bit much. There was a ton of piracy reported to 3DS and Maya not too long ago and they realized that it was in their best interest to find legal ways of allowing the artistic crowd to learn their product. Does this apply to VS.NET? (90 day trial is not a solution either)

  122. Killer Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux: Telling Microsoft where to go since 1991 Love your sig.

  123. The reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that they are "forced" to use pirate the software because they need that to get a job.

    Why? Since 90% of the software using in those Asian country are pirated, every software are cheap! You can get a copy of Autocad, 3Dstudio, Maya with all Adobe, Macromedia and MS for under $10. Now everyone can use that program so the job began to require more and more software skill with the resume'. Some Asian graphic design job that were posted recently (according to my Thai friend) need 3Dstudio, Maya, Autocad, Photoshop, Illustrator, Go Live, Flash, Dreamweaver, Freehand, Quark, Pagemaker, InDesign, Fireworks, Director, plus MS Office. See why they need to pirate software?

    Cheaper or their own version of software? It all die a long time ago since nobody using legal copy anymore (Yes, even it's free). Now that's might explain why there are so many Asian programmer working now in the U.S.

  124. Another government sells out by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
    Per an article in the Taipei Times MS will cut prices on 13 of its products by "up to" 54 percent, but that "it remains to be seen whether Microsoft's distributors will pass the price cuts on to consumers." Office XP Pro would "in theory" drop 14%. No mention of Windows. In addition, the code-sharing agreement only stipulates "portions" of Windows' code, and leaves it entirely up to MS to decide who get to see it.

    Consumers' groups don't like the decision, which the government is locked into for five years. The deal was done behind closed doors, with all details withheld. And there don't appear to be any penalties for MS if it fails to abide by the terms of the agreement.

    Originally, the government had threatened to reopen an anti-trust investigation if MS didn't sit down and bargain, but there has been a lot of speculation -- particularly by the news media, who love to speculate on such things -- that MS had threatened to back out of a research park project if the investigation was re-opened. If true, it appears to mean the government caved first.

  125. I see a problem .... by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

    you compare selling crack to kids with steeling software from the richest man in the world.

    yah I can see how both those things are equally bad.

    Dumb ass.

    --
    --meh--
    1. Re:I see a problem .... by _fuzz_ · · Score: 1
      you compare selling crack to kids with steeling software from the richest man in the world. yah I can see how both those things are equally bad.

      I was waiting for someone to comment on that. The point isn't "which is worse," but that both are wrong. "Equally bad" is irrelevant. I could have used shop-lifting instead of drug dealing and the point would be the same. The point is: poor circumstances do not justify crime.

      And it's not just stealing software from the richest man in the world. It's stealing from everyone who works for Microsoft, even indirectly. It's stealing from the engineers who work on the software. It's stealing from the janitor who mops the floor. It's stealing from the construction worker who adds on to the campus. It's stealing from the high-schooler who works at the espresso stand across from the campus. If Microsoft were bringing in millions more in revenue, all those people would be getting a slice of that, however small it may be.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
  126. You left out laziness. by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    For most people, security is not important. Top performance is not important. Optimum configuration is not important. Control is not important. Not having to power toggle is not important.

    Being able to put the CD in the CD drive, press a button a couple of times, reboot, and get what you want is VERY IMPORTANT. NOT THINKING is VERY IMPORTANT.

    You forgot laziness. That's why most people will see if they can get what they want without addressing security, performance or configuration. That's also the reason I dropped MS products, even at home. Linux was getting easier to use, install and maintain. MS-Windows was getting harder and more trouble-prone. One week I realized that they'd crossed and migrated the home network minus one to Linux. Windows kept getting harder to maintain, patches broke things, and keeping a Windows machine just wasn't worth the effort.

    Last summer, I started running OS X.. That hits the nail on the head -- secure, powerful and flexible yet you don't need to think and you don't need to work to add/remove functionality or maintain it. Far easier than anything else, plus I can keep a mix like Photoshop, Filemaker, Emacs, MySQL, etc.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  127. North or south? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    Why do people just call it 'Korea'? North and South Korea are very different? I thought South Korea was much richer than North, almost as rich as the USA.

  128. File formats not applications by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    More to the point -- what are they supposed when someone sends them .doc files?
    This is precisely why focus needs to turn to the file formats rather than the applications.

    If the file format is open and well-documented then it shouldn't matter which application users choose to run - they can choose what works best for them in regards to performace, ease of use, security and such.

    .DOC files, even if they are MS-Word, are the very example of interoperability problems. There is no MS-Word format, but instead a whole suite of related, yet incompatible formats (please point out my mistakes, this is from memory):

    • DOS
      • 2,3,4&5.x
    • Macintosh
      • 2,3,4,5,6, 98, XP
    • Windows
      • 2.x, 6.x,7.x, 97, 2000, XP
    Converting between these, you will lose something depending on the version. I've lost language, styles, metadata at different times. Unfortunately the loss was not always apparent at the time of migration.

    Just sticking with the DOS/Windows examples above, that's 9 different formats in less than 15 years, an average of 0.6 per year. To put it in English, a new format is put out more frequently than every two years. Lack of forward compatibility between the file formats used by these applications has been used consistently to drive upgrades of office packages, operating systems and hardware, all of which cause strain with retraining and budgets.

    Heads up on the changes planned in for MS-Office 2003, especially the DRM, they look to cause extreme difficulty.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  129. .doc file format by rtdrury · · Score: 1

    Most users would rather have NO filename extension, and not worry about formats at all.

    It isn't necessary for non-techie users to know about file formats - the necessity arises only to support the bogus institution of indefinite monopolies via indefinite copyright. With time limited copyright, only the newest, fanciest formats remain proprietary for any length of time during which a format is read only by its proprietary application program. When it gets commoditized, it goes into the public domain, it gets supported depending on its popularity and the user only needs to think about more specialized formats which the masses never have to bother with.

  130. Hehehehe... he said "M$"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is sooooooooo witty. I am so impressed.

    And it is the kind of FUD that makes people *not* listen to us that are opposed to them. Anyone who sees that will think "what a childish petty little loser". And they'll be right.

    Stop hurting OSS you ba$tard. Stop trying to score cheap points the schoolyard bully way, by assigning a mocking nickname to your adversary.

  131. Re:Chinese Immorality: Software Piracy by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Microsoft should simply build and distribute, for free, special versions of its software infected with destructive viruses

    They don't need to really, I got the wife a new 'puter with WindowsXP on it, and the first thing it did was downloaded about 20 critical security related patches. Chinese with boot-legged Windows sure aren't likely to go to microsoft for patches. Even if they did require a password to get a patch down-loaded at a bit rate above a certain level say faster than 15KbS then "lose" the passwrd after so any down-loads and Email it to the Email used at registration scheme.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  132. Still overcharging ~3.65x by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    So now they're only overcharging 3.65 times the free martket price instead of 5.

    The monopoly rents for MS-Office and MS-Windows have been about 5 times the free market price. So they came down 27% for Taiwan. So? 73% of 5 is 3.65.

    When it gets down to close to 1, then it would be news. Otherwise, it's just a PR move. It could be interesting if it indicates the cutoff point at which Office and Windows start to turn a loss.

    Will maintenance costs associated with the viruses, worms and other security problems provided by MS-Office and MS-Windows also be counted in the figure? OpenOffice is free, plus no worms. StarOffice costs, but you get support, plus no worms.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  133. Configuring? Try WinME VS. WinXP! by budgenator · · Score: 1

    The main reason people don't understand Linux is, IMHO, the fact that every distribution does things differently from the other

    Unfortunately I've gotten pretty good at "fixing" the Windows ME machine at work, now we gotten one Windows XP machine and everything I know about Windows ME don't mean squat in Windows XP the configuration interface differences between the two are much larger than the difference between two different linux distro's

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:Configuring? Try WinME VS. WinXP! by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      That's because WinME has its roots back in the MS-DOS days and Windows 3.x. Check it out, and you'll see similarities.
      WinXP has its roots in Windows NT. If you were to look at Windows NT 3.1 (1991 if I'm not mistaken) you'd recognise a lot of concepts but in a very raw form and with the same GUI as Windows 3.1.

      Too bad OS/2 Warp lost the battle with Win95. OS/2 was by far the better OS.

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  134. Re:High cost of software--my sig by ferrous+oxide · · Score: 1

    It's just something Issac Asimov said. Or rather, it's something that he's said to have said. I've never found any evidence that the quote is genuinely attributable to him.

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  135. Global Competition by Idou · · Score: 1

    Not sure if I conveyed such an assumption, but let me clarify. I do not expect every businessman to know accounting, but I do assume more competent businessmen to have taken the time and effort to master it, at least the basics of it. The same for, say, someone who wants to do business in Japan. I don't assume that they need to actually learn Japanese (a very time consuming process, more so than accounting. I can personal attest to this), but you better believe I would pay the individual fluent in Japanese more.

    Knowledge about computers is different only in that it effects EVERYTHING these days. There is NOTHING you can decide to do in this world that having knowledge about computers will not greatly increase your value in the workforce. Some people learn enough to get by with Windows, but you better believe that, for now, the person that has gone to the trouble learn Linux (and, say, what an IP address), will have better luck getting a job or starting a business these days. With Lindows and other easy distros becoming more prevalent, this probably will soon not be true with Linux as a whole (and you will no longer be posting messages like this, as the rest of the herd moves to cheaper and easier Linux), but I suppose distros like Debian will still require some set of computer skills.

    I do assume that you are from a wealthy western country, probably the U.S. and are very uncomfortable with the idea that you might have to change or learn new stuff to sustain your quality of life, but this is a reality. You couldn't have missed the /. article about India moving in on higher level American jobs. You must accept this as a trend or face serious consequences later. Global competition is just getting started, and if you are not willing to "dirty" your hands in crafting skills in powerfull tools like "Open Source", then someone in this world will for half your wage. Unfortunately, you probably won't understant this for another couple of years until AFTER this occurs, but who can blame me for trying?

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Global Competition by NineNine · · Score: 1

      will have better luck getting a job or starting a business these days.

      Getting a job for me is irrelevant. I saw the writing on the wall a few years ago, and I bailed from IT. That ended up being a good move. I, in turn, started my own "brick-and-mortar" business. If I had decided to "learn computers" by using all OSS software, I'd still be working on starting, 5 months later. It would be stupid, and a tremendous waste of time and money to learn the ins and outs of computers when I can buy software for a few thousand that does what I need. IP address? I know what one is, but how exactly does that make me a better businessman? I'd much rather pay someone else to worry about that. If you'd ever had a business, you'd know that you don't spend time dicking around with little stuff like that. You pay someone to handle it, and get on with the important parts. Any businessperson that's not in IT that's foolish enough to waste a significant amount of time "understanding computers" is gonna fail. Why? Again, unless he's in IT, it's irrelevant to the business. I could've also spent 6 months learning how to acid stain my concrete floors and a few years learning carpentry to build my shelving, and I'd still be learning. It's called specialization. It's how modern society works. If nobody specialized, we'd all still be a nation of subsistence farmers.

    2. Re:Global Competition by Idou · · Score: 1

      "Again, unless he's in IT, it's irrelevant to the business."

      Well, for your specific case, I would say your ignorance of IT has led you to assume that just buying MS software is best for all your software needs because that seemed the easiest from your perspective. Your business could have gained a competitive advantage, but your prejudice that all Open Source software takes "5 months to learn" has caused you to commit to a "square peg" solution.

      I know a guy owns his own successful business. Let me tell something, if you want specialization you should work for a company. This guy was able to speak legal talk with our lawyers, finance talk with our finance people (me), was very aware of his industry, new plenty about software (unrelated to his industry), and was a great negotiator. Of course he doesn't do everything himself, but he know enough to make the right decisions, and it took 6 different specialists at my company to talk about the different aspects of the deal that he was completely comfortable talking about. Needless to say, his company got the job and will be very successful as a result.

      Specialization only works if you get enough people to fall in sync (corporation). If you want to run your own business, you would be better as a "Jack of all trades." Business is not about advancing the knowledge of a field but about advancing the IMPLEMENTATION of knowledge in a field. It is not about one's ability to master a specific field, but a careful balance of many different talents molded in such a way that brings a customer the most economic solution.

      Your modern society seems to be stuck in the industrial age, while the rest of us are moving into the "information" age.

      "I could've also spent 6 months learning how to acid stain my concrete floors and a few years learning carpentry to build my shelving "

      I hope you didn't overpay in these areas too and at least did some minimal research on the Internet . . .

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  136. The irony by willpost · · Score: 1

    So the offshore tech workers employed by US companies can buy US software at an offshore price, while the US tech workers lose their job and still have to pay the US price.

    "We're not hiring but since you're here, would you like to buy something?"

  137. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time there was a DOS user who saw Unix, and saw that it was
    good. After typing cp on his DOS machine at home, he downloaded GNU's
    unix tools ported to DOS and installed them. He rm'd, cp'd, and mv'd
    happily for many days, and upon finding elvis, he vi'd and was happy. After
    a long day at work (on a Unix box) he came home, started editing a file,
    and couldn't figure out why he couldn't suspend vi (w/ ctrl-z) to do
    a compile.
    -- Erik Troan, ewt@tipper.oit.unc.edu

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...