I'd recommend relaxing. One doesn't always have to do things and learning to accept that is healthy. Have to say that properly learning to relax/meditate isn't a waste of time - being able to think of the problems in ones life calmly without being stressed leads to better solutions in general.
Great. So how many of those browns have the same birthdate?
Not relevant. And you do understand that Brown isn't an uncommon last name?
And did they do a similar analysis of white people to see whether or not the same occurence is happening there?
Not relevant. But if the description is right then the same things should be happening to white* people too. The frequency though?
(* I assume we don't include the Irish, Germans and Swedes in that group? The "modern" description of whites being all people originating in Europe (and even Ireland!) is frankly disgusting and a recent invention. God save the English and no other than the English!/s)
Until you do I'll and any reasonable being will assume the data presented is correct - which I'd do even it it was presented by a child eating nazi communist. You see facts are the things that don't change because of a bias. Not what you wrote above.
About as many as other people with strange spelling irregardless* their ethnic group? Really...
You could look up the statistics if you'd want to. I don't. I hope the ACLU doesn't cry wolf but really don't care enough to check. But if you please report back.
Your understanding of the (US) laws is severely lacking. While creating group discriminating non-protected groups would be allowed (with some limitations) discriminating of protected groups would not.
Yes but the data itself isn't dangerous! The dangers are in the mind of the beholder but the electrons in themselves aren't dangerous! Information want to be free!
Yeah. People getting killed when some pictures of them in some situation (a guy kissing another guy, a member of a sect meeting the "enemy" of the sect etc.) never happen. Words have never caused people to be inspired to do the things the words describe.
I wonder what kind of world you are living in. Either a fantasy or an overly abstracted world where e.g. opening a door doesn't demostrably enable access to the other side of it.
Yep. They essentially undid what people worked hard for (well the pigs did the most work) with selective breeding. Hundreds or even thousands of years of work undone in a few. It's impressive but as pigs are mainly bred for their tasty meat I can but wonder why they did it.
Nuclear bombers are only useful for a large-scale nuclear response (the US would of course never be the first to attack/s). That's because bombers have been placed in the position to continue bombardment when ICBM and SLBM forces can't be used either because they have been destroyed or because they've run out of missiles. Then when most of the potential targets have already turned into rubble the bombers can fly in and target the remainder. It is a slow delivery method.
This was useful against the Soviet union as the land mass and number of targets (both military and civilian) are huge. Is this useful against North Korea? I think not.
Sure I could. If I'd be a very slow at typing - because (as for most projects) actually getting to know the problems takes some drilling down. Most people are enthusiastic when they get some thing working and those things are easily found while people that didn't get things working either: 1) just drop the program 2) tinker a bit and try to get it working (asking questions) 3) complain loudly acting as a little child 4) complain loudly because the problems are due to to the emulator design and nobody seem to care. It takes time to detect such tings and detect then someone is a no 3 or 4.
Just trying a program for a limited time isn't enough. It can bug out after running X hours when events Y and Z happens simultaneously and the emulator doesn't handle that correctly for instance.
The 80186 integrated some extra functionality, added some instructions and optimized timings compared to the 8086. It didn't change the basic ISA keeping the real mode unprotected segmentation with 1MiB address space and 16 bit registers. The 80286 was the one that changed anything significant by adding (in a very clumsy way) a protected mode with 16 bit segmentation and an expanded addressable space. This also indirectly meant that 80286+ systems suddenly could access 1MiB+64KiB-16B, the upper near-64KiB part was commonly called high memory.
Timeline: 8086, 8088 (8 bit bus for cheaper systems), 80186.
For what? Last time I looked it could be used for games. Some games. Often the popular ones that somebody cared enough about to write workarounds for. It wasn't even good at emulating hardware used by games and creativity programs (music players, graphics stuff etc.).
Of course that was my impression from some years ago, could be better now.
One can absolutely write low level code in Rust. There are examples available. Most parts of Linux are high-ish level but many parts are low level - or if doing actual interfacing with hardware isn't low level I wonder what you consider low enough. Microcode? That would be a table for hardware to interpret.
The accusations may be true. If they are later shown to be will you then rant about how Google and Facebook let people with money harass people while normal people are shut down? Or would you even acknowledge that you were wrong?
There is no permission removed. But nobody is forced to permit distribution under the same license. Real freedom, both for developers and users.
In most cases it's advantageous to co-operate with other in developing the software but the BSD allows co-operation of some parts and private development of other parts. A choice in other words - freedom. And the user can choose to go with the software from a company that is based on BSD sourcecode or using the same original sourcecode.
You may think that users of open source should be forced to keep the development open under the same license and I'd actually agree with that for a subset of software - but the GPL is simply less free than the BSD license which in turn is less free than e.g. CC0.
Slashdot Mirror
It may seem dark but if you just took your head out of your ass it'd look brighter.
I'd recommend relaxing. One doesn't always have to do things and learning to accept that is healthy.
Have to say that properly learning to relax/meditate isn't a waste of time - being able to think of the problems in ones life calmly without being stressed leads to better solutions in general.
Hmm... No, the above post isn't proof that you've never trusted BlackBerry. A strong indication perhaps...
And attempting to do it would probably be asking the engineers and then relay their response to the court: "it's impossible"
This is a case of you being an idiot. How about understanding before condemning? Nah, not your style. Idiot.
Great. So how many of those browns have the same birthdate?
Not relevant. And you do understand that Brown isn't an uncommon last name?
And did they do a similar analysis of white people to see whether or not the same occurence is happening there?
Not relevant. But if the description is right then the same things should be happening to white* people too. The frequency though?
(* I assume we don't include the Irish, Germans and Swedes in that group? The "modern" description of whites being all people originating in Europe (and even Ireland!) is frankly disgusting and a recent invention. God save the English and no other than the English! /s)
Okay. Prove it.
Until you do I'll and any reasonable being will assume the data presented is correct - which I'd do even it it was presented by a child eating nazi communist.
You see facts are the things that don't change because of a bias. Not what you wrote above.
If it also included a place of birth (with sufficient precision) we'd not have this discussion at all.
In a democracy (even a representative one) a vote should count. That's the basic thing. Even if it doesn't change anything.
About as many as other people with strange spelling irregardless* their ethnic group? Really...
You could look up the statistics if you'd want to. I don't. I hope the ACLU doesn't cry wolf but really don't care enough to check.
But if you please report back.
(* yeah, suck it up)
Your understanding of the (US) laws is severely lacking. While creating group discriminating non-protected groups would be allowed (with some limitations) discriminating of protected groups would not.
Yes but the data itself isn't dangerous! The dangers are in the mind of the beholder but the electrons in themselves aren't dangerous! Information want to be free!
(sarcasm for those that can't detect it)
Yeah. People getting killed when some pictures of them in some situation (a guy kissing another guy, a member of a sect meeting the "enemy" of the sect etc.) never happen. Words have never caused people to be inspired to do the things the words describe.
I wonder what kind of world you are living in. Either a fantasy or an overly abstracted world where e.g. opening a door doesn't demostrably enable access to the other side of it.
Yep. They essentially undid what people worked hard for (well the pigs did the most work) with selective breeding. Hundreds or even thousands of years of work undone in a few.
It's impressive but as pigs are mainly bred for their tasty meat I can but wonder why they did it.
Liberals? You mean those that claim gene manipulation is a sin against _God_?
Nuclear bombers are only useful for a large-scale nuclear response (the US would of course never be the first to attack/s). That's because bombers have been placed in the position to continue bombardment when ICBM and SLBM forces can't be used either because they have been destroyed or because they've run out of missiles. Then when most of the potential targets have already turned into rubble the bombers can fly in and target the remainder. It is a slow delivery method.
This was useful against the Soviet union as the land mass and number of targets (both military and civilian) are huge. Is this useful against North Korea? I think not.
Sure I could. If I'd be a very slow at typing - because (as for most projects) actually getting to know the problems takes some drilling down. Most people are enthusiastic when they get some thing working and those things are easily found while people that didn't get things working either: 1) just drop the program 2) tinker a bit and try to get it working (asking questions) 3) complain loudly acting as a little child 4) complain loudly because the problems are due to to the emulator design and nobody seem to care. It takes time to detect such tings and detect then someone is a no 3 or 4.
Just trying a program for a limited time isn't enough. It can bug out after running X hours when events Y and Z happens simultaneously and the emulator doesn't handle that correctly for instance.
The 80186 integrated some extra functionality, added some instructions and optimized timings compared to the 8086. It didn't change the basic ISA keeping the real mode unprotected segmentation with 1MiB address space and 16 bit registers.
The 80286 was the one that changed anything significant by adding (in a very clumsy way) a protected mode with 16 bit segmentation and an expanded addressable space. This also indirectly meant that 80286+ systems suddenly could access 1MiB+64KiB-16B, the upper near-64KiB part was commonly called high memory.
Timeline: 8086, 8088 (8 bit bus for cheaper systems), 80186.
For what? Last time I looked it could be used for games. Some games. Often the popular ones that somebody cared enough about to write workarounds for.
It wasn't even good at emulating hardware used by games and creativity programs (music players, graphics stuff etc.).
Of course that was my impression from some years ago, could be better now.
One can absolutely write low level code in Rust. There are examples available. Most parts of Linux are high-ish level but many parts are low level - or if doing actual interfacing with hardware isn't low level I wonder what you consider low enough. Microcode? That would be a table for hardware to interpret.
The accusations may be true. If they are later shown to be will you then rant about how Google and Facebook let people with money harass people while normal people are shut down? Or would you even acknowledge that you were wrong?
There is no permission removed. But nobody is forced to permit distribution under the same license. Real freedom, both for developers and users.
In most cases it's advantageous to co-operate with other in developing the software but the BSD allows co-operation of some parts and private development of other parts. A choice in other words - freedom. And the user can choose to go with the software from a company that is based on BSD sourcecode or using the same original sourcecode.
You may think that users of open source should be forced to keep the development open under the same license and I'd actually agree with that for a subset of software - but the GPL is simply less free than the BSD license which in turn is less free than e.g. CC0.
But you haven't earned it. Get the fuck out!
Yes. ...
Wait, did you imply that would be a bad thing?
Work.