Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Scientists Create Genetically Modified Low-Fat Pigs (npr.org)

Chinese scientists have created low-fat pigs using new genetic engineering techniques. "In a paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists report that they have created 12 healthy pigs with about 24 percent less body fat than normal pigs," reports NPR. From the report: The scientists created low-fat pigs in the hopes of providing pig farmers with animals that would be less expensive to raise and would suffer less in cold weather. The animals have less body fat because they have a gene that allows them to regulate their body temperatures better by burning fat. That could save farmers millions of dollars in heating and feeding costs, as well as prevent millions of piglets from suffering and dying in cold weather. The Chinese scientists created the animals using a new gene-editing technique known as CRISPR-Cas9. It enables scientists to make changes in DNA much more easily and precisely than ever before. Pigs lack a gene, called UPC1, which most other mammals have. The gene helps animals regulate their body temperatures in cold temperatures. The scientists edited a mouse version of the gene into pig cells. They then used those cells to create more than 2,553 cloned pig embryos. Next, scientists implanted the genetically modified cloned pig embryos into 13 female pigs. Three of the female surrogate mother pigs became pregnant, producing 12 male piglets, the researchers report.

181 comments

  1. The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chinese Scientists Create Less Tasty Pigs

    1. Re:The headline I see by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I know it's not a popular stand to take but - some science is just wrong and shouldn't be done.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "Chinese scientists eliminate whole categories of tasty Chinese dishes."

    3. Re:The headline I see by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      ...while the rest of us enjoy guilt-free bacon.

      That tastes just like turkey bacon!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:The headline I see by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Chinese Scientists Create Less Tasty Pigs"

      The crossbred it with the 'long pig' variant.

    5. Re:The headline I see by Megol · · Score: 1

      Liberals? You mean those that claim gene manipulation is a sin against _God_?

    6. Re:The headline I see by Megol · · Score: 1

      Yep. They essentially undid what people worked hard for (well the pigs did the most work) with selective breeding. Hundreds or even thousands of years of work undone in a few.
      It's impressive but as pigs are mainly bred for their tasty meat I can but wonder why they did it.

    7. Re:The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Progressives, not liberals. We're concerned about unintended consequences, not religiously opposed. It's the fucking idiot progressives who have a religious hatred of GMO everything.

    8. Re:The headline I see by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      That's the first thing I thought about when I read this, less flavor in pork.

      We've already killed beef off with flavor, having less and less intramuscular fat.

      You look at a picture of a Prime cut of beef from the 50's even to the late 60's compared to today's "prime" cuts, and you see a HUGE difference in fat content.

      That fat is flavor.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Pics? I had thought that more fat was a goal for most cattlemen as it brought with it increased price. My dad, who grew up on a corn farm, always said that the beef got much better once they started corn feeding the cattle. There used to be stickers on the meat in supermarkets that boasted that the cow had been fattened on corn.

    10. Re:The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we first understand why pigs don't have UPC1 before we add it?

    11. Re:The headline I see by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Really? Pics?

      Yep, I've seen photo cards that USDA has had in the past that were samples of what a "prime" cut of a ribeye was supposed to look like.

      The old ones were downright pink from the intramuscular fat, whereas there is hardly any flecks of fat to be seen in todays prime cuts as compared to back then.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:The headline I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know it's not a popular stand to take but - some science is just wrong and shouldn't be done.

      Chinese use science to make pigs that can be abused more severely by chinese factory farms.

    13. Re:The headline I see by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      A flavoir that makes me vomit.
      Especially with beef.

      I prefere the meet cooked on fire or in a pan, so that the fat melts away, the remains I cut away.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:The headline I see by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      skinny haram pig ... omg let's hope they don't attract the attention of the terrerizt now ... i don't think a porc chop needs lots of fat to be tasty ... bacon without fat however .... that's probably debatable ... but i still like it crunchy , fried till the fat is molten OMG IM SUCH A PIG

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. I don't understand by TWX · · Score: 1

    Chinese Scientists Create Genetically Modified Low-Fat Pigs

    But what are they for?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I don't understand by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Bacon! It's good for you!

    2. Re:I don't understand by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Low fat bacon? No thanks!! Give American full fat bacon.

    3. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Die @ids, best disease. Heart disease no good!

    4. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low fat bacon? No thanks!! Give American full fat bacon.

      There was many a true word spoken in jest; American-style rashers are practically all-fat and no bacon.

    5. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what else was all-fat and no bacon?
      The "Pre-Game Show" for the United States Grand Prix. Having a Pro Wrestling Dude announce the Drivers was bad enough, but there were Team Instructions that all the Drivers had to be present and stand during that truly awful rendition of the "Star Spangled Banner"... even though there were no American Drivers, thus exempt. Hamilton was pissed, but preferred not to make a point of it. Don't anger the Rubes.
      Actually, it was otherwise a really good race, although the Track Stewards may be in hiding for a while. But the Drivers stayed Gentlemen; as much as the American crowd would really have liked Verstappen going after Raikkonen with a folding metal chair on the Podium, WWF style.

    6. Re:I don't understand by quenda · · Score: 1

      This technology could lead to a treatment for human obesity. Now I have your attention slashdot!?

      Newborn humans use this gene/protein to generate heat from fat.
      CRISPR/Cas9 could potentially be used to restore this ability to obese adults, allowing them to burn more fat keeping warm without shivering. (not just new embryos)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re:I don't understand by mark-t · · Score: 1

      CRISPR/Cas9 could potentially be used to restore this ability to obese adults...

      Uh... adults? How is that supposed to work, exactly? I thought gene editing in mammals could only be done on embryos.

    8. Re:I don't understand by quenda · · Score: 1

      I thought gene editing in mammals could only be done on embryos.

      Welcome to the future. It is new, and so far, human trials have only been done "in vitro", with cells taken from body, treated, and replaced. And then only on the terminally ill (afaik).
      But in theory, something like CRISPR could one day be injected and edit your cells by the billion. Finding a delivery mechanism that gets the gene editing tool to a large number of you fat cells (mitochondria in this case) safely, makes it a much greater challenge than editing an embryo.

    9. Re:I don't understand by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because proper Spanish pork is "low fat".

      It only seems to be America where pork is supposed to be "the other white meat". This fixation doesn't seem to exist anywhere else in the world (at least until now). Other European pork also doesn't seem to have this low fat tasteless quality.

      "The other white meat" needs to die a fiery death.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Rashers and Sarnies are not Spanish. It might have been different if that Armada hadn't gone and drowned themselves.
      Various means of Spanish Cooking, transplanted overseas by utter Cads, used the fat within Cheap Pork to bring the heat deep within the toughly muscled Porcines... within range to gentrify them. This was an easy way. This fat is then rendered out, and made to tastify something otherwise indigestible, usually involving Amerindian Corn, and too much Salt.

      Such a low Slashdot ID; I assume that you must be very recent, and thus uninformed.
      High fat does not mean tasty quality. It means $Profits$.
      And in case you never got the Joke going way back to Swift, if Pork is "The Other White Meat"... what is the Original White Meat?
      We really do taste, all things being equal, much the same.

    11. Re:I don't understand by tsa · · Score: 1

      That would be so cool. Eliminating heriditary breast cancer just by vaccinating.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    12. Re:I don't understand by quenda · · Score: 1

      That would be so cool. Eliminating heriditary breast cancer just by vaccinating.

      If you can identify the problem gene, e.g. BRCA1, then potentially yes, you can alter the germline.
        But as it is dominant, it would be so much easier to select an egg or embryo without the gene.

    13. Re:I don't understand by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Viruses have been doing this for eons
      There has been work done on using viruses as a vector for gene editing post-embryo

    14. Re:I don't understand by Agripa · · Score: 1

      It only seems to be America where pork is supposed to be "the other white meat".

      This is because the primary white meat in America since World War 2 is chicken.

      https://practicingresurrection...

    15. Re:I don't understand by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      I could cut&paste you the summary.
      But you could simply scroll up ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:I don't understand by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Humans obviously already have that gene, which is clearly written in the summary.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:I don't understand by quenda · · Score: 1

      Humans obviously already have that gene, which is clearly written in the summary.

      Yes, its not so simple in humans as in pigs. The gene/protein is active in newborns, not but adults.

  3. What is this fat burning gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And where can I get one?

    1. Re:What is this fat burning gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want it. I have it, a mutation in UCP1 (not UPC1 as reported). I'm too hot most of the time unless I'm almost naked, as I am in my 19C room as I write. Always hungry, I'm not fat. As I walk around in winter dressed for summer people stare at me. Forget coat and tie! Where did I get it? Congenital, in the mitochondria.

  4. No Bacon by Ducho_CWB · · Score: 2

    Baconless pig is for millenials.

    1. Re:No Bacon by coolmoe2 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on whats wrong with leaner bacon? Now some fat is good but unless your rendering it for pork fat what wrong with leaner bacon? more bacon for your buck and less fat in the pan.

    2. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An animal with a face and a mother has to die for your pleasure.

    3. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A plant older than you had to be murdered to build your house. If you're going to birch yourself, go full bore man.

    4. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We found the vigilantly vegan in the group. Meat tastes good. I'm a reformed vegetarian and I'll eat meat for the rest of my life. I'll soon be raising it and killing it myself too, a task the vast majority of meat eaters can't even fathom doing.

    5. Re:No Bacon by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I call bullshit on your heart disease post. My grandmother ate bacon all her life, and for most of her life she cooked with LARD. Yes, lard, that fat from hogs. Nearly everything tastes better when cooked with real fat - biscuits, fried chicken, cakes, etc.. Note that my grandmother lived to within months of her 90th birthday. How long is your skinny ass going to live?

      It's lifestyle, not diet. She led a life filled with physical work, rarely ever saw a doctor, and was taking no prescription medicines. Hell, she worked outside doing yardwork the day before she died. Her mind was still as sharp as a tack. What's your excuse?

      I am 64, soon to be 65. My blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar are all normal. I eat bacon and a lot of other "unhealthful" food, but I also lead a lifestyle that involves a LOT of physical activity.

    6. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit on your anecdotal health "information" and I can't wait until you die? :D More for me! Bye now old fart collection!

    7. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegetarianism is like the people who think they can live off of sun light alone. Welcome back to the fold, brother. Sister? zciser?

    8. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      K, have fun with your lame life where you still die at the end from something preventable.

    9. Re: No Bacon by Brockmire · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize there is no fucking correlation with high fat and heart disease, right? Totally made up. Fat is good for you. Carbs are not. https://idmprogram.com/blog/

    10. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded, fat and fasting is the key to health.

    11. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to die lol.

    12. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy dying!

    13. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, you must still be using leeches to treat cancer it appears.

    14. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's great tasting, you still know it's completely unnecessary for your survival and shame on you for it.

    15. Re: No Bacon by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have 3 more anecdotes to add to the pile. They were all people that never bought into any sort of new age diet nonsense. They also lived into their 90s.

      It's probably not even "life style". It's genetics.

      The fates are cruel bitches and no amount of self flagellation is going to help you. You're just going to spend what time you have being miserable.

      Although moderation might help. You don't have to bathe in bacon daily to enjoy it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my Beyond Burger and my Chao right here. What's your excuse for your ignorance, and terribly lame attempt at an argument?

       

    17. Re: No Bacon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Depending on the particular cancer, a good bleeding is just the thing actually. It's helpful for some other blood disorders too.

      A hammer might not be good for everything but it pounds in nails just fine.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:No Bacon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > An animal with a face and a mother has to die for your pleasure.

      Not "pleasure", lack of suitable enzymes.

      A pig is the ultimate omnivore. It can eat all sorts of things we can't and convert them into things we can. It's also much better suited to modern industrial farming conditions than cattle.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re:No Bacon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > While it's great tasting, you still know it's completely unnecessary for your survival and shame on you for it.

      I know no such thing. You are as anti-science as an anti-vaxxer failing to acknowledge the limitations of human biology. I have enough medical problems without adding self-induced malnutrition.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plants aren't sentient, but hey, thanks for your plant activism concern trolling you insincere clod.
      Check out silence of the yams!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_uor8oxrAg

    21. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > While it's great tasting, you still know it's completely unnecessary for your survival and shame on you for it.

      I know no such thing. You are as anti-science as an anti-vaxxer failing to acknowledge the limitations of human biology. I have enough medical problems without adding self-induced malnutrition.

      Your medical (and comprehension) problems are probably from all that meat, fish, eggs, and dairy you're eating and clogging up your brain and heart, and your position is both anti-science and anti-logic.

    22. Re:No Bacon by rossz · · Score: 1

      Yes, we get it. Every single medical problem throughout history is caused by meat. You vegans/vegetarians are as clueless as anti-vaxxers. Also, your farts are a bio-hazard.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    23. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90 is the new 40. Only chumps kick it before 90, and based on your heredity, you're SOL.
      110+ or GTFO.
      You cannot exercise your way out of a shitty diet. Now get off my lawn!

    24. Re:No Bacon by tsa · · Score: 1

      And your breath smells of elderberries.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    25. Re:No Bacon by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      It's lifestyle, not diet.

      Actually, it is mostly genetics.

    26. Re: No Bacon by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      This is true, and there are several studies confirming this, one based on a few million participants (IIRC, the entire population of Denmark). At the very least, all these studies confirm that consumption of saturated fats has no correlation with incidence of cardiovascular diseases.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    27. Re:No Bacon by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      You vegans/vegetarians are as clueless as anti-vaxxers.

      As a vegetarian, I resemble that remark. We are not the militant activists annoying people in workplace lunchrooms and college cafeterias. That is the vegans.

      Comparing a vegetarian to a vegan is like comparing a Methodist to a Wahhabist.

      Disclaimer: My daughter is a vegan. We aren't inviting her to Thanksgiving dinner.

    28. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plants are as sentient as many animals tho.

    29. Re:No Bacon by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Indeed, genetics matter!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    30. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your daughter stops by and slaps the fork out of your hand.
      You need to stop, and you know better, you willfully ignorant pus eater.

    31. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How conveniently ignorant.
      It's not that every single medical problem is caused by meat, just the big 3... heart disease, cancer and diabetes. Oh yeah, and we have a better immune system than you do because it works better to be sick less often. Clueless? Hardly. We're more informed than you bloodlusting carnists, who cost everyone more money with end of life care.

      Follow the science:
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677008/
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11795/
      http://rvgn.org/2015/05/09/anti-vax-and-veganism/

    32. Re:No Bacon by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      The face is the best part.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    33. Re:No Bacon by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on whats wrong with leaner bacon?

      Less flavor.

      Fat in meat == flavor.

      That's why today's beef is MUCH less flavorful than beef a few decades back. We've bred out the intramuscular fat where the flavor is. I remember eating beef as a kid and it had a MUCH better flavor than it does now.

      Pork too is already leaner than it used to be....reducing it more makes it less flavorful.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:No Bacon by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a mother. We ate her already. Delicious.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    35. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it's 60% / 40% and the 40% doesn't count if your culture turns degenerate. Explains why USA nibbers are stupid, lazy and violent generation after generation no matter the gub'mnt dole shoveled into their blackstrap maws.

    36. Re:No Bacon by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Brains are made of cholesterol. If you aren't eating meat, you are losing brain matter.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    37. Re: No Bacon by s122604 · · Score: 1

      I have very mild high blood pressure
      I've found that routine blood donation, 6 times a year, actually keeps it in check

      as would not being a fatass I'm sure.. but my willpower sux

    38. Re:No Bacon by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Now I got a hankering for a hog jowl sandwich

    39. Re: No Bacon by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Your quote reminded me of something I had almost forgotten completely. Quite a while ago (maybe over 15 years) I read an article about countries who had introduced processed sugar to their collective diet much more recently than the US had. Since the timing was more recent, there were more comprehensive modern medical records available from which the author could glean data about changes in public health. It is difficult to recall the details, but I seem to remember a 60 year time span from the introduction of processed sugar being important. I also seem to remember over that time the incidence of heart disease growing drastically, as well as other health issues becoming much more common.

      At the time I also remember the author being excoriated and undermined as a kook who was after the sugar industry. With the recent revelations about the sugar industry paying off Harvard scientists to tell everyone sugar is not responsible for heart disease I want to go back and read it again. I even think the article was a distillation of a book the author had written. Wish I could remember more details, my google fu has failed me in finding the article.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    40. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure that plants aren't. Do you know about forests? The trees talk to each other via roots, sharing minerals.

    41. Re:No Bacon by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What are you actually doing with bacon?
      You put iti into a pan and fry it ... so more fat is better.
      You take it out of the pan when the meet and remaining fat is crisp.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    42. Re:No Bacon by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is nonsense ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re: No Bacon by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Fat is good in measure.
      So are carbs.

      Claiming that one is good and the other is bad is just bollocks.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    44. Re: No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might take a look at âoeThe big fat surpriseâ by Nina Teicholz, ISBN 9781451624427.

    45. Re:No Bacon by coolmoe2 · · Score: 1

      "What are you actually doing with bacon?"
      Im having sex with it. How do you handle bacon.
      "You put it into a pan and fry it ... so more fat is better."
      Um... buy really cheap bacon its mostly fat and when you crisp fry it almost disappears. With leaner bacon you have more left when your done but less fat in the pan.
      Now when I talked about rendering it down i mean crisp fry the shit outta it and drain the clarified grease into a jar and stick it in the fridge. Then you use that to fry other stuff and it adds a nice bacon overtone.
      "You take it out of the pan when the meet and remaining fat is crisp."
      Okay im gonna do you a favor and not be the grammar nazi or perhaps im too stoned to get what your trying to convey here. The bacon should be crisp but the fat is the liquid shit in the pan so no it wont be crisp. Although I think you were referring to the marbling in the bacon itself which is very thoroughly cooked and as crispy as the rest of the meat.
      Thanks for playing bacon basics.

    46. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, an anecdote. How useful.

    47. Re:No Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is funny how you try to use a single anecdote to disprove him, and then go on to correlate grandma's longevity with physical activity as the cause. You live in a dream world.

    48. Re:No Bacon by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, a part of the fat will "melt" and be in the pan, the rest remains and becomes crisp.

      But your talk about "cheap bacon" scared me ... perhaps you have really strange fat or strange beacon :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. Those weren't the modifications I was looking for by dlleigh · · Score: 1

    I want one of the following predicted genetic modifications for pigs: 1. Create bacon that has omega-3 fatty acids so that it's actually good for you. 2. Modify the pigs to chew their cud so that the meat will be kosher.

  6. Suffer less in cold weather? by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Fat is an insulator, what polar bears and arctic seals have.

    Don't they mean suffer in HOT weather?

    1. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Pigs can't burn fat for warmth (according to the summary).

      Because of this the only defense against cold pigs have is accumulating more fat, and small/young ones die.

      This modification means they require less fat to regulate body temperature, and burn more when it's cold (which is why they are leaner).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... no, even a cursory reading of the snippet explains exactly why they mean less fat.

    3. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by Brigadier · · Score: 2

      fta -"..The animals have less body fat because they have a gene that allows them to regulate their body temperatures better by burning fat. "

    4. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Seems as sensible as me regulating my temperature by burning my overcoat.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re: Suffer less in cold weather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you could burn it as efficiently as the body burns fat it would be.
      Except it wouldn't last as long as fat.

    6. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you could generate more overcoat by eating, sure.

    7. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It is all in the summary, facepalm.
      Ordinary pigs lack a gene to regulate body temperature properly.
      Hence they even freeze with fat in cold weather.
      With the additional gene they can burn their fat, and don't freeze.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Suffer less in cold weather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a sheep. Sheep say BAAAAAAAA!

  7. Stuffed pig? by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    They then used those cells to create more than 2,553 cloned pig embryos. Next, scientists implanted the genetically modified cloned pig embryos into 13 female pigs.

    That's a lot (196) of embryos per pig. The female pigs would have exploded if the embryos had all been viable.

    At least the piglets look cute.

    The animals were slaughtered when they were six months old so scientists could analyze their bodies.

    Oh damn, that was harsh.

    Let the bacon jokes begin...

    1. Re:Stuffed pig? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Let the bacon jokes begin...

      Without all that bacon grease what will those hillbillies use to cook their... well, everything?

      My sister married one of those hillbillies, he calls himself that. My sister complains about the abundance of greasy foods since they moved out to new jobs where the mountains have a blue hue to them.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  8. Obligatory by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Obligatory by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 2
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Soon to be irrelevant? https://xkcd.com/418/

  9. low fat pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to taste the bacon first!!!!!

    1. Re:low fat pigs by coolmoe2 · · Score: 1
      I promise it will taste better then "turkey bacon" which is a sin in my book.

      Im an athiest too so the bar is... well living in a weird place.

    2. Re:low fat pigs by GregMmm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but many athists would agree there is just some things that have to be called a "sin". I support you in removal of the evil "turkey bacon". Repent!! Repent!! Do not be deceived by "turkey bacon" any longer. Behold the one true bacon!

    3. Re:low fat pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turkey bacon is good but it's not bacon. You can't eat turkey bacon with the expectation that it's pig bacon. If you go in realizing it is turkey it's actually pretty good.

      Bacon of course is a multitude of awesomeness above turkey anything, but that's true of beef compared to turkey as well.

      Turkey's only saving grace is it's basically fat free and in some cases free of most flavor as well. That's helpful when you want to give it all the specific flavors you want.

      Shame, because I love pork and beef. Mix them together and the meal just got better.

    4. Re:low fat pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what is worse than turkey bacon? Beef bacon. From the name you think it is combining two delicious things into one, got to be good right? Wrong. It is so very wrong, but around here has pretty much displaced turkey bacon as the safe breakfast food that anyone can eat choice at hotel buffets and the like (they don't seem to consider Hindus in that analysis).

    5. Re:low fat pigs by blindseer · · Score: 1

      You know what is worse than turkey bacon? Beef bacon. From the name you think it is combining two delicious things into one, got to be good right? Wrong. It is so very wrong, but around here has pretty much displaced turkey bacon as the safe breakfast food that anyone can eat choice at hotel buffets and the like (they don't seem to consider Hindus in that analysis).

      If restaurants had to adhere to the dietary requirements of every religion in the world then they'd be able to serve nothing. Something has to give unless there is a sufficient number of non-conflicting dietary standards that a hotel could have a restaurant, or group of restaurants, that it would make sense to have multiple separate kitchens to satisfy them all. If all the restaurant served was beef bacon and beef sausages as meat for breakfast then perhaps the Hindus need to be satisfied with the omelets and cheesy potatoes for protein. Hopefully for supper there will be a chicken dinner on the menu.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  10. Heritability by PopeRatface · · Score: 0

    At least one male even mated, producing healthy offspring, he says.

    I'd be interested to know if the modification turned out to be heritable. Otherwise that could be a really expensive pig to cultivate.

    --
    Oy vey! It's anudda Shoah, I tells ya! Anudda Shoah!
    1. Re:Heritability by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Why would you think it wouldn't be heritable? TFA confirms that the method was applied to embryos, so presumably most, if not all, of their cells would contain the modified gene.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  11. Chinese find a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chinese find a way to leave you feeling even hungrier after eating Chinese food. News at 11:00.

  12. I see applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for law enforcement.

  13. Suffering by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    prevent millions of piglets from suffering and dying in cold weather

    Yeah, suffering in a factory farm and dying at the hands of hungry Chinese at 1 year old is so much better.

    1. Re:Suffering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a ... chomp chomp ... bitch to be ... chew chew chew ... a pig.

  14. Find another gene by dasgoober · · Score: 2

    A gene that gives the lower-fat pigs more flavor, otherwise, I don't see how this is an improvement over white-meat chicken.

    1. Re:Find another gene by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      As an American you wouldn't. You eat the parts of the bacon that much of the civilised world cuts off. ;-)

      No seriously though, the UK and colonies tend to eat cuts of bacon with the loin and back, whereas in America and continental Europe they tend to go for the streaky cut. There is far less fat in the loin and it is (in my opinion) more delicious.

      Now that anecdote aside, the UK and colonies and eastern Europe tend to also prefer to roast the neck and tenderloins which are also very low fat, but they can't hold a candle to a decent German roasted porkbelly or pork knuckle.

      Long live fat :)

    2. Re:Find another gene by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The idea isn't to make low fat pigs, it's to make low fat humans. If a similar technique can be used on people then they will be much less prone to obesity.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Find another gene by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      How about making an all dark-meat pig?
      White meat blows.

    4. Re:Find another gene by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      No seriously though, the UK and colonies tend to eat cuts of bacon with the loin and back, whereas in America and continental Europe they tend to go for the streaky cut. There is far less fat in the loin and it is (in my opinion) more delicious.

      Well, it's called streaky bacon in the UK apparently.

      Anyhow, what I've never understood is why Americans take the fatty bacon cuts then basically cook off all the fat - leaving the bacon hard and crispy, but lacking all the fat that the cut had. Granted, good chefs save the bacon fat that's now on the pan for further cooking, so flavoring the stuff cooked afterwards, but it always struck me as odd.

      Yes, I don't particularly like hard crispy bacon - when I get bacon (the streaking american kind) I always halve the cooking time so it gets nice and hot and fat just starts to run out, but the slices are nice and moist and limp and oh-so-tasty. Bacon bits never really appealed to me - it's just like jerky.

    5. Re:Find another gene by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Wow. An argument against what we Americans call bacon.

      This isn't to demotivate others from eating it so you can have it all?

      My dad pulls that one all the time ...

    6. Re:Find another gene by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Mans already have that gene ...
      But perhaps we find anither one.

      Obesity is mostly caused by wrong gut bacteria ... people can digest fibres, which ordinary people can't.
      Inassume they get infected via eating the wrong parts of cows ... or gut bacteria somehow get into sausages.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. Can my fat ass have this gene pls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would sit and regulate the shit out of this fat belly.

    1. Re: Can my fat ass have this gene pls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't eat so often. You'll be amazed at the results

  16. Alternative solution by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. and why this isn't a good idea by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    I used to go hunting a lot. Feral pigs (or boars) are super aggressive and destroy the area they are in. You need a reasonably large caliber rifle to kill them, they breed like crazy and are full of worms so you can't eat them. They will attack humans, are smarter than a dog and boars can grow pretty big - you would not want to mess with one unless you had a weapon.

    *Anything* that can potentially get into the wild, like a genetically engineered pig that can survive cold, is a really, really bad idea. Expect at least one of these pigs to escape and breed in the wild.

    This is an extremely short sighted endeavor.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re: and why this isn't a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry, there are no Wild animals in China. Outside of nature reserves, they've all been eaten or captured.

    2. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Odd. Most places I've lived wild pigs have been edible. I'm not saying they aren't dangerous, just that they are edible and reputed to have excellent taste.

      P.S.: They also aren't very fat.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It might be just where I was, however they turned me off pork for a while.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re: and why this isn't a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, there are no Wild animals in China. Outside of nature reserves, they've all been eaten or captured.

      Only close to the cities.

    5. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      Yea, it just takes one time where the meat isn't cooked hot enough and your getting something pulled out of your ass at the doctors. Or worst, like my cousin, who had to have surgery.

    6. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Wild pigs already have that gene.
      Humans first breeded it away, to have fatter pigs. Now gene edit it back in, to save heating costs for mass production.
      I happily eat the old pig races we still have in germany :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Expect at least one of these pigs to escape and breed in the wild.

      Well since they were all slaughtered and dissected I guess that's one less prophecy of yours that will come true, eh Nostradamus?

    8. Re:and why this isn't a good idea by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it just isn't worth the hassle of dealing with it. Surgery would be horrible - must have been a massive worm.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  18. Next breakthrough by Megahard · · Score: 1

    Israeli Scientists Create Genetically Modified Kosher Pigs

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:Next breakthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called a goat.

    2. Re:Next breakthrough by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Has the added benefit of being completely unsympathetic if you've ever actually met one. It's like lamb without the "guilt".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  19. Incoming: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Zombie pig apocalypse!!!1!

  20. I for one welcome our Inpigmen Overlords by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new In-pig-men Overlords, and wish someone had realized how close the pig genome was to humans before we were replaced, once they learned how to code telepathically our robot slaves.

    All hail the Porkamon Empire!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re: I for one welcome our Inpigmen Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be OK until they make some birds get angry by stealing their eggs.

  21. OK. thats it. Im going to do it. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Low Fat Pigs?

    OK, I am going to invent dehydrated water. Top that Chinese scientists.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  22. Consumer Demand by jblues · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something I noticed - pork in my birth country, Australia, is already low fat, due to selective breeding. Here in Asia it is very fatty - people seem to prefer that.

    --
    If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    1. Re:Consumer Demand by hai_Priesty · · Score: 2

      I can't quote you which publication was that now (Bloomberg businessweek?), but it there was a article a few years ago about the result of selective breeding of cows, both the physical shape of the cow and fat content of the beef in the commercial range of western world is very different from now. But whatever fat content lowered in the beef in the 2010s, people compensate by slathering butter, BBQ sauce and seasoning imaginable to make it more palatable. Thus there are no obvious lowering of calorie count - if fact, it may be slightly worse for health due to the sugar content and chemicals in artificial additives.

    2. Re:Consumer Demand by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Australia, but I know pig breeders in the US made a concerted effort to breed leaner pigs as a result of the low-fact craze.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    3. Re:Consumer Demand by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Something I noticed - pork in my birth country, Australia, is already low fat, due to selective breeding.

      Pork in your birth country is low fat due to selective cutting. You go buy "bacon" in the shops you will end up with a large cut of the loin and middle. You go buy bacon elsewhere you'll end up with the bits that we cut off :-)

    4. Re:Consumer Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a much longer term trend: Through WW2, pigs were primarily bred and butchered for lard. The trend towards leaner pigs has been going for almost 80 years.

    5. Re:Consumer Demand by jblues · · Score: 1

      Latest research seems to indicate that the saturated fat in animal products, especially naturally raised and grass- as opposed to grain-fed, is quite healthy. Ancel Keys (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancel_Keys) was responsible for promoting a high-fiber, mostly vegetable and whole grain diet. Folks are saying now that saturated fat from whole sources were - unnecessarily demonised due to a failure to do non-linear covariate regression analysis.

      A reasonably low-fat diet consisting of whole and low GI foods is probably harmless, but a very low-fat diet, should certainly be avoided. They're needed for vitamin absorption, and in men, especially saturated fats for production of testosterone. Perhaps the declining sperm-count in western men is because of the focus over the last 50 years on a low-fat diet.

      Saturated fat aside, unfortunately Ancel Keys best intentions to encourage a whole-food diet went astray, with most of us now subsisting on processed foods made with high-fructose corn syrup!

      tldr; fat can be healthy. Of course it is calorie dense, but a good option is to reduce carbs, especially high GI carbs either regularly whenever a high fat meal is consumed. Definitely avoid processed and hydrogenated oils though (again processed foods) - they contain the evil cancer causing trans fats.

      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    6. Re:Consumer Demand by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the declining sperm-count in western men is because of the focus over the last 50 years on a low-fat diet.
      That is certainly annoption.
      However I assume your drinking water simply contains to much estrogen as it is not as good treated as in europe e.g.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  23. So chinese Bacon is off the menu.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what could possibly go wrong!

  24. Researchers working to fix long-pigs next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm long-pig....

  25. What They Really Did by n329619 · · Score: 1

    They bought a bigger exercise pen for the pigs.

  26. But can they... by easyTree · · Score: 1

    ...engineer pigs which have the taste and texture of vegetables?

  27. Pinky predecesor? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    Not long now until muscle bound pigs escaping and rapidly evolving to feed on humans.

  28. The gene is actually UCP1, UnCoupling Protein 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a mutation in UCP1 that keeps my metabolism full on all the time. During winter I'm stared at because I'm dressed comfortably for summer. It's changed my life - I sweat heavily when dressed normally indoors, and if I wear shorts and singlet people think I'm gay. It also gives me a permanent crease down the middle of my upper back - my son's gf called it "reverse cleavage". The more I eat, the hotter I get, but I can't get fat.

  29. It's OKJA... again by AlejandroTejadaC · · Score: 1

    Didn't they learn anything from watching how this ends in too many sci-fi movies? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  30. low fat superstition again by swell · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Less fat?!?!? These so-called scientists need to wake up. We've been brainwashed for over 30 years to avoid fat. How well has that worked? We're fatter than ever. Meanwhile, over 30 years ago a quiet voice in the void said we should avoid carbohydrates and eat much more fat. More than 30 million people listened to Dr. Atkins and those scientists who followed him and they are healthier than ever. Scientists have confirmed the less carbs / more fat plan but government and commercial interests are still pushing the low fat dogma.

    It's not just your body that suffers from starchy foods, you are 40% more likely to develop dementia. Eat more fat, less carbs!

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:low fat superstition again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, did you even read the summary?

      The scientists did not create these pigs because they would be healthier to eat.

    2. Re:low fat superstition again by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Atkinson is not a high fat advocator.
      He is a high proteine advocator.

      Replacing carbs with fat makes not much sense, unless you are a maori or inuit.

      Reducing carbs makes sense, especially high processed ones.

      There is nothing wrong with a boal of good asian rice or a chunk of good black german bread made from ray.

      The combination of fat and carbs in the same meal is the problem, especially if it is high processed carbs and high saturrated fats.

      Citing Atkinson and obviously never having read a book about him is kinda a sin/lie.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:low fat superstition again by swell · · Score: 1

      I don't know who this Atkinson is that you speak of.

      Dr. Atkins made it crystal clear that fat is essential. Additionally he pointed out that too much protein will be converted by the body into carbohydrate. Eat only normal amounts.

      If you are aware of any of the popular diets since Atkins, you know that they tend to agree. I've done Atkins for 30 years, my brother does Paleo which is similar. Here are some others: New Diet Revolution; Carbohydrate Addicts Diet; the Zone; Sugar Busters!; Protein Power, Mediterranean, etc.

      For about a century, the Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation has been preaching a similar diet based upon studies of animals and humans around the world. They became particularly interested in Inuit people who lived largely on whale blubber and had little access to vegetables at that time. Before they adopted a Western diet they were very healthy. Not so healthy these days.

      Neither Atkins nor I have all the answers for all the body types that exist.
      It sounds like you think you do.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    4. Re:low fat superstition again by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes,
      and all those diets emphasize on proteins, not on fat.

      If you would replace the typical carb intake a person with a "average diet" has with fat, you probably would not live long. And it would be super impractical. Suppose one eats about 300g carbs per day. Perhaps even 500g, you hardly will replace that with fat. (Carbs and fat have basically the same weight per amount of calories)

      Mediterranean is usually a 1/3rd of each diet. They eat lots of carbs. But also lots of vegetables and low fat, just enough olive oil and cheese to make it tasty :D However it contains lots of fish. And the whole eating culture is completely different, than US e.g. No idiotic snacks during "work time" because you can not "survive" the afternoon without snacks ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:low fat superstition again by swell · · Score: 1

      hey angel
      I'd love to argue with you about this in person, but slashdot isn't ideal.
      good day

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    6. Re:low fat superstition again by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      then sent me an email :)
      angelo -dot- schneider -at- oomentor -dot- de

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  31. non-fat pigs ... small tit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...women. And they still insist on talking ! OhMEOhmY what has modern science wrought ?

  32. Wait a minute... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Pigs.. low-fat... CRISPR-Cas9...

    Are they making low-fat, crisper bacon?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  33. Can I have that gene editing done too please by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Less fat stored from a single gene change? More fat burned when it's cold?

    Sign me up and if anyone needs me I'll be in the outdoor swimming pool.

    1. Re:Can I have that gene editing done too please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want it. I was born with it, wear summer clothing during winter, and sweat so much I have to add sea water to my diet.

  34. It's not fat that makes you fat. by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    It's sugar.

  35. Re:Those weren't the modifications I was looking f by gtall · · Score: 1

    I'd settle for the Chinese scientists fixing their pigs so that they weren't generating new flu strains to export to the rest of the world. Pigs and humans are close physiologically, close enough where flu viruses jump. One of the big flu generating areas is southern China where farmers apparently get a bit to comfy with their livestock.

  36. Re:Those weren't the modifications I was looking f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why mess with it? Saturated fat is good for you as it is.

  37. Way too indirect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want to be creating is genetically modified low-fat Americans.

  38. Don't they know how to keep pigs warm? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Medieval Northern Europeans had to deal with plenty of cold pigs, so they built two story houses and put the pigs on the first floor. Both pigs and people stayed nice and warm.

    1. Re:Don't they know how to keep pigs warm? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Martha! This place smells and sounds like there are pigs living downstairs!

      It's like we're living in a barn or something!

  39. Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new low-fat pigs overlords!

  40. I saw this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already saw this one and I swear, Tilda Swinton's acting gets better every year.

  41. Homer said it best by gachunt · · Score: 1

    "Without the grease all you can taste is the hog anus"

    ~ Homer Simpson

  42. Great by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    Now find the gene that makes humans less fatty and sell it to trump. $$$$$$$

  43. Pigs are a huge problem in the wild in many places by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    Right? Pigs that go wild are supposedly destroying land and pushing out native wildlife all over the US. Do we need to make them even more resilient (to weather)?

  44. Come to Texas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have lean pigs everywhere in Texas. They're incredibly destructive to our lands. Please come kill them and take them. Even with the number of hunters and trappers we have, they still breed faster than we can keep up with.

  45. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't modify the pigs. MODIFY ME! Leave the pigs nice and tasty and make me burn more fat!

  46. Getting low-fat pigs is trivial by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    just don't put them through extensive feeding but let them grow up slowly.