No that is _not_ how it works, unless FBI made people download child pornography that they wouldn't otherwise have downloaded then it isn't entrapment. Police dressing up as hookers isn't entrapment if they don't try to convince people to have sex with them for money. Police acting as drug dealers isn't entrapment unless they try to convince people to buy drugs from them.
Proven to be false? How do you then explain damages of coral far from any river but with increased pH level? Unless one is a believer in homeopathy that makes no sense...
Are you trying to joke? It isn't funny. That Earth have regulation mechanisms is well known however there is no hard limit - those mechanisms can be overwhelmed.
Extremely overpriced. You can get a computer with much more storage, more processing power, more memory, better graphics etc. for 1/2 the price of the Apple device. Yes it will be heavier but IMHO ~200grams isn't much to complain about. Those ~200grams means you can upgrade the storage and memory in the future and that the computer have a cooling system making it possible to actually use the graphics card...
The thing is that the increase in kinetic energy by the acceleration is considerably less than the energy input! I have tried to make you do the calculations (which are trivial) but you obviously have no interest of doing a fact check. Hey, I understand making mistakes (humans do that - and I consider myself a human) but here the mistake would be easy to spot by doing the calculation. You are welcome to criticize the concept of the Em-drive however you want _but_ do that without arguments that aren't 100% wrong, the Em-drive isn't a perpetuum mobile in any way or form.
Again: given the input of 1W of power (1J/s) what is the increase in kinetic energy? You can assume any weight, the force is 1.2microN etc.
While that is true many people do vote by gender - in this case it would be something huge indicating that women can reach the highest power in the US. And one have to be dishonest (or just clueless) to thing Hillary wasn't qualified for the post.
But now we got a sexist, racist serial liar with serious personality defects that is absolutely clueless about the world, the powers of the US president and essentially everything he ever mentioned. The best outcome would be Mr. Trump being a figurehead for a real president, given his inability to even take good advice that is unlikely. Many throughout the world feared this outcome, I do hope the voters accept the problems ahead...
You keep repeating that this is a perpetuum mobile without giving any reason to. Just repeating something doesn't make it true! Likewise saying that something doesn't work without proof thereof is 100% unscientific!
1W of electrical power produces a thrust of 1.2microN.
Ion thrusters: 1W produces a thrust of 20microN.
Why aren't your complaining that ion thrusters are perpetuum mobiles? Perhaps because you really have no freaking clue?
The thing about Em-drives are that they shouldn't work but apparently does, not that they accelerate given energy input.
Use those figures (1W input produces 1.2microN of force) and present us with an equation showing over-unity performance.
[NB I don't think that Em-drives will be proven working in the end - however I'm not a cargo cult "scientist" and so wait for actual scientists to do their thing]
You are sounding like one of the free energy cranks only in reverse. The system doesn't have to spin "fast enough" unless you are trying to invoke magic. Do a steady state analysis instead, it should still provide the right answer if your hypothesis is correct. Hell, let us make the system unrealistic with no losses except the given efficiency of the Em-drive. That is: no generator losses, no resistive losses, no frictional losses etc. NB that it is trivial to make perpetuum mobiles assuming no frictional losses.
It should be trivial to solve for someone as talented as yourself.
Thinking that the laws of nature are absolute is a thing of faith and not scientific. Nature need not have a fixed set of laws and indeed even today it is assumed that they break down in e.g. singularities.
How is that different than people that think killing those of other religions, gender (if not following a certain model of behavior), politic worldview, gang affiliation, style of clothing, sexual behavior or even those that run an other operating system?
What you are doing is called poisoning the well and, well, it isn't logical... That some persons with x think people of y should be killed is unfortunate but doesn't meant persons with y think people of x shouldn't be killed, it doesn't say how many x persons think killing is a good idea _and_ it totally ignores the fact that idiots think killing others over bullshit all the time - and even do so! People get killed because they walk wrong or happen to glance in the wrong direction all the time.
Given you obvious knowledge in the area please provide us nitwits with the maths describing over unity of such a contraption. It should be easy as you already have determined it is indeed over unity... Or perhaps you are just another bullshitter?
Well, if the drive works, then either the symmetry underlying conservation of momentum isn't entriely true (it wouldn't be the first time we discovered a surprising lack of symmetry, you know), or the drive isn't entirely reactionless.
Yes, and that would mean it's a perpetual motion machine too. This would be pretty much the largest result in physics ever. You can see why people, including myself reckon it's completely bogus.
How would you use a functioning Em-drive as a perpetuum mobile? That is in the real world, not a thought experiment. After all using a thought experiment using conventional physics a perpetuum mobile is possible - with zero friction many strange things are possible. So how would you use a functioning Em-drive in the real world (with conversation losses) as one?
Well, laws of physics are created by humans to understand and explain how things work, they are far from absolute (yes some scientists really believe they are absolute, dumbass scientists that is).
The laws of physics are absolute even if we don't know exactly what they are yet. If they're not then you're essentially saying that anything can happen at any time for any reason, i.e. magic exists.
No, it would mean that the laws of physics aren't in general deterministic. Have you heard of quantum physics? Virtual particles? Radioactive decay?
There are still so many mysteries that cannot be exlpained using the 'laws of physics' as they are now, so even in that regard you know these 'laws' are not definite..
That's just flat-out mysticism.
There is no guarantee that the scientific method is able to describe the world exactly. There is no guarantee that there are absolute laws of nature, in fact there are a number of cases known today where it is assumed laws of nature break down - e.g. black holes.
Both science and laws of nature are human creations to describe the world. The world isn't bound to follow those creations.
Deniers are still around and even in positions of power (South Africa...). My "favorite" claimed cause of AIDS was a quacking idiot that claimed it resulted from petroleum jelly used as lubricant...
Because that is _much_ less likely? Because the majority of people that actually say that is the vector are openly racist and try to paint Africans as regularly having sex with monkeys (often in combination with claims that Africans are monkeys)? Because hunting primates as meat is an important food source in some places and hunters tend to get minor wounds where contact of infected primate blood while field dressing the animal could easily spread the infection? Because bestiality isn't an important part of life (done daily) and is less likely to transfer an infection in the first place?
But you can continue to fantasize about fucking primates if you want...
People eating meat can get deficiencies, where did you get the idea they don't? Your statements about fibers are also wrong as shown by research. Maybe you confuse problem with fibers with eating fibers with too little fluid intake which can indeed lead to constipation - but that is well known.
Slashdot Mirror
No that is _not_ how it works, unless FBI made people download child pornography that they wouldn't otherwise have downloaded then it isn't entrapment. Police dressing up as hookers isn't entrapment if they don't try to convince people to have sex with them for money. Police acting as drug dealers isn't entrapment unless they try to convince people to buy drugs from them.
Proven to be false? How do you then explain damages of coral far from any river but with increased pH level? Unless one is a believer in homeopathy that makes no sense...
Are you trying to joke? It isn't funny. That Earth have regulation mechanisms is well known however there is no hard limit - those mechanisms can be overwhelmed.
You keep believing that, just wear a tinfoil hat for both you and our benefit please. Have to know who to avoid...
Well with a 17" computer you can have a desktop - but in a portable format. ;)
Look for example at the MSI GS73VR - ~2.5kg (~5.4 pounds) with a GTX 1060 and a i7 6700HQ.
Extremely overpriced. You can get a computer with much more storage, more processing power, more memory, better graphics etc. for 1/2 the price of the Apple device. Yes it will be heavier but IMHO ~200grams isn't much to complain about. Those ~200grams means you can upgrade the storage and memory in the future and that the computer have a cooling system making it possible to actually use the graphics card...
Readers are available for free and expecting old software to read data files for new software is more than a bit strange...
The thing is that the increase in kinetic energy by the acceleration is considerably less than the energy input! I have tried to make you do the calculations (which are trivial) but you obviously have no interest of doing a fact check. Hey, I understand making mistakes (humans do that - and I consider myself a human) but here the mistake would be easy to spot by doing the calculation. You are welcome to criticize the concept of the Em-drive however you want _but_ do that without arguments that aren't 100% wrong, the Em-drive isn't a perpetuum mobile in any way or form.
Again: given the input of 1W of power (1J/s) what is the increase in kinetic energy? You can assume any weight, the force is 1.2microN etc.
While that is true many people do vote by gender - in this case it would be something huge indicating that women can reach the highest power in the US. And one have to be dishonest (or just clueless) to thing Hillary wasn't qualified for the post.
But now we got a sexist, racist serial liar with serious personality defects that is absolutely clueless about the world, the powers of the US president and essentially everything he ever mentioned. The best outcome would be Mr. Trump being a figurehead for a real president, given his inability to even take good advice that is unlikely. Many throughout the world feared this outcome, I do hope the voters accept the problems ahead...
No it is more than just a "thing" - we know that it behaves like matter in many ways thus the name.
You keep repeating that this is a perpetuum mobile without giving any reason to. Just repeating something doesn't make it true! Likewise saying that something doesn't work without proof thereof is 100% unscientific!
1W of electrical power produces a thrust of 1.2microN.
Ion thrusters: 1W produces a thrust of 20microN.
Why aren't your complaining that ion thrusters are perpetuum mobiles? Perhaps because you really have no freaking clue?
The thing about Em-drives are that they shouldn't work but apparently does, not that they accelerate given energy input.
Use those figures (1W input produces 1.2microN of force) and present us with an equation showing over-unity performance.
[NB I don't think that Em-drives will be proven working in the end - however I'm not a cargo cult "scientist" and so wait for actual scientists to do their thing]
You are sounding like one of the free energy cranks only in reverse. The system doesn't have to spin "fast enough" unless you are trying to invoke magic.
Do a steady state analysis instead, it should still provide the right answer if your hypothesis is correct. Hell, let us make the system unrealistic with no losses except the given efficiency of the Em-drive. That is: no generator losses, no resistive losses, no frictional losses etc. NB that it is trivial to make perpetuum mobiles assuming no frictional losses.
It should be trivial to solve for someone as talented as yourself.
Thinking that the laws of nature are absolute is a thing of faith and not scientific. Nature need not have a fixed set of laws and indeed even today it is assumed that they break down in e.g. singularities.
How is that different than people that think killing those of other religions, gender (if not following a certain model of behavior), politic worldview, gang affiliation, style of clothing, sexual behavior or even those that run an other operating system?
What you are doing is called poisoning the well and, well, it isn't logical... That some persons with x think people of y should be killed is unfortunate but doesn't meant persons with y think people of x shouldn't be killed, it doesn't say how many x persons think killing is a good idea _and_ it totally ignores the fact that idiots think killing others over bullshit all the time - and even do so! People get killed because they walk wrong or happen to glance in the wrong direction all the time.
TL;DR fuck you.
If you have no friction. In real life there are friction and other losses.
Given you obvious knowledge in the area please provide us nitwits with the maths describing over unity of such a contraption. It should be easy as you already have determined it is indeed over unity... Or perhaps you are just another bullshitter?
Well, if the drive works, then either the symmetry underlying conservation of momentum isn't entriely true (it wouldn't be the first time we discovered a surprising lack of symmetry, you know), or the drive isn't entirely reactionless.
Yes, and that would mean it's a perpetual motion machine too. This would be pretty much the largest result in physics ever. You can see why people, including myself reckon it's completely bogus.
How would you use a functioning Em-drive as a perpetuum mobile?
That is in the real world, not a thought experiment. After all using a thought experiment using conventional physics a perpetuum mobile is possible - with zero friction many strange things are possible. So how would you use a functioning Em-drive in the real world (with conversation losses) as one?
Likely yes. But do you realize that your position is very anti-scientific?
Well, laws of physics are created by humans to understand and explain how things work, they are far from absolute (yes some scientists really believe they are absolute, dumbass scientists that is).
The laws of physics are absolute even if we don't know exactly what they are yet. If they're not then you're essentially saying that anything can happen at any time for any reason, i.e. magic exists.
No, it would mean that the laws of physics aren't in general deterministic. Have you heard of quantum physics? Virtual particles? Radioactive decay?
There are still so many mysteries that cannot be exlpained using the 'laws of physics' as they are now, so even in that regard you know these 'laws' are not definite..
That's just flat-out mysticism.
There is no guarantee that the scientific method is able to describe the world exactly. There is no guarantee that there are absolute laws of nature, in fact there are a number of cases known today where it is assumed laws of nature break down - e.g. black holes.
Both science and laws of nature are human creations to describe the world. The world isn't bound to follow those creations.
Deniers are still around and even in positions of power (South Africa...). My "favorite" claimed cause of AIDS was a quacking idiot that claimed it resulted from petroleum jelly used as lubricant...
Because that is _much_ less likely?
Because the majority of people that actually say that is the vector are openly racist and try to paint Africans as regularly having sex with monkeys (often in combination with claims that Africans are monkeys)? Because hunting primates as meat is an important food source in some places and hunters tend to get minor wounds where contact of infected primate blood while field dressing the animal could easily spread the infection? Because bestiality isn't an important part of life (done daily) and is less likely to transfer an infection in the first place?
But you can continue to fantasize about fucking primates if you want...
'Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors"
and yet there's a climate change article almost weekly...
Not "almost weekly" but climate change != leaks nor rumors.
le sigh
Indeed.
Why not remap it to something useful? That's what I like to do...
People eating meat can get deficiencies, where did you get the idea they don't? Your statements about fibers are also wrong as shown by research. Maybe you confuse problem with fibers with eating fibers with too little fluid intake which can indeed lead to constipation - but that is well known.
Nope, just pissed by trolling. It adds noise. But I also added noise and in a very bad form too. Can't take it back though :/