Slashdot Mirror


It Looks Like Apple is Killing the Physical Esc and Power Keys On New MacBook Pro

Curious minds on the internet have uncovered an image file on their Mac, which was added by Apple in the latest macOS update. The image reveals a new laptop that fully fits the description of rumored MacBook Pro, which Apple is expected to launch on October 27. The laptop in the picture has what seems like a "contextual" OLED display (some are calling it Magic Toolbar display) on the top. What's interesting from that picture is that there's no physical Escape key or Power key to be found anywhere.

Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors, but several readers pitched the story to us, and media outlets are also covering it now, which adds some credibility to the matter.

524 comments

  1. How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just joking. Of course we'll all just have to change our key bindings.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you guys will start to realize you've been duped into changing natural efficiency patterns so you can conform better to your feudal shitlords' ideals of impotence. Then get a real OS.

    2. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by red_dragon · · Score: 2

      Of course, this change makes using vi damn near impossible. This is all part of the Eric Conspiracy to force us to use Emacs.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    3. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Or Vi / Vim for that matter.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reaching for the esc key is anything but natural.

    5. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      Which is why it's called an "Escape" key. You use it under exceptional conditions. You don't want it underfoot, but when you need it, it needs to be there.

      Pretty soon, people will be able to use real Apple hardware to insult Nigerian scammers, instead of sending a cardboard P-P-P-P-Powerbook.

    6. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a problem with CTRL+[? Works on everything I've used so far, except for the blasted TVI-950, which always sends CTRL+].

    7. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Televideo are mavericks that way.

    8. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It is actually more convenient than the screw up by IBM to move the control key in an unnatural position. For Emacs you don't need escape if you've got a handy Meta key (which also inconvenient if you use Alt to be Meta, although the useless Windows key is in a good position for Meta).

    9. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe the Esc key will be available as an over priced dongle?

    10. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because using your left thumb for every other keystroke is sooooo ergonomic.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use the escape key regularly in Vi[m] you don't really know how to use it.

    12. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have a problem with CTRL+[? Works on everything I've used so far, except for the blasted TVI-950, which always sends CTRL+].

      You must live in a country which has a nice '[' key on the keyboard. Most keyboards in the world access those symbols with Alt-Gr.

      (Sucks to be them, I know...but this will make it suck even worse)

      --
      No sig today...
    13. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by bn-7bc · · Score: 2

      Hmm try hanging eindows in irssi (default key bindings) without using esc, iwould not call chaninging windows in an irc client an exeptional condotion would you?

    14. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by bn-7bc · · Score: 2

      I've got to sttart actualy reading my own posts befoe submiting :( the first senrence was supposed to be "hmm try changing windows in irssi......". Come ro think of it how du you dugest I get out of insert mode in vim without using esc?

    15. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by presidenteloco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ctrl+Anything is not ergonomic.

      If you spend serious hours and days and weeks and months and years programming or doing IT admin, your hands will get damaged with the repeated stretches and twists needed to do Ctrl+whatever. You might say there are two-handed alternatives to the twisty-stretchy ones, but two handed gestures are prone to failure by reversed order of press.

      These are all small details, yes, but ergonomic details make the difference when you have to do things thousands and thousands of times.

      Esc is a single key action.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    16. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Natural? Banging rocks together is natural. Keyboard command entry is civilized.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      My US/Russian keyboard laptop has [ next to P, as does a UK, Italian, Croatian, Czech, Slovak and Spanish keyboard. Latin American has it next to Ñ. Must be hell to access array indices if you don't have one of them...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    18. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friends don't let friends drink and vi.

    19. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Go into the shell, install systemd and then emacs on top of it, and delete everything from XNU and above. Then redefine the option key as ESC

    20. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which is why it's called an "Escape" key. You use it under exceptional conditions. You don't want it underfoot, but when you need it, it needs to be there.

      First they came for my floppy drive, and I did not speak out, because floppies were slow and I was glad to be rid of them anyway.

      Then they came for my CD-ROM drive, and I did not speak out, because I appreciated a lighter, more compact laptop.

      Then they came for my headphone jack, and I did not speak out, because I use my damn phone as a phone, not a stereo.

      Then they came for my escape key, and I knew there was no way out.

      They they came for my power button, and there was no one left to hear the perpetual screams.

      And my MacBook, never flickering, still is sitting, still is sitting
      By the pallid bust of Steve Jobs just above my basement door;
      And its screen has all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming,
      And the process o'er it streaming throws exceptions galore;
      And my soul from out that process started back in days of yore
      Shall be turned off -- nevermore!

    21. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ... a bluetooth keyboard with a single key labelled "ESC". Would probably cost around $50 and in a few months would be a security vector or something that corrupts all the data

    22. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      They are getting ready for the "courage" to release the Macbook Wheel

    23. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My US/Russian keyboard laptop has [ next to P, as does a UK, Italian, Croatian, Czech, Slovak and Spanish keyboard. Latin American has it next to Ñ.

      Not in my Latin America.

    24. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually use Vi at all?
      It sounds like you're spouting dogmatic theory without considering the reality.

      The "single key action" of pressing escape requires moving your entire hand up and to the left, then returning it to the home row.

      Ctrl + [ requires the minor movement of holding the left Ctrl key with the left hand little finger, and then pressing [ with the right hand. That's not a "two handed alternative" that IS how you press it. If you were pressing it with one hand, then you were making life difficult for yourself.
      Ctrl doesn't do anything unless you press something else, so you just press it clearly first - and hold it until you've released the [ key. There's no failure by reversed order of press - at least no more than you'd get from failure by completely hitting the wrong key in the first place.

      I've been using Vi for more than twenty years, spending serious hours, days, weeks and months programming AND doing IT admin. My hands didn't get damaged until I had to move them off the keyboard and start using a mouse in a graphical IDE. (I can no longer use a mouse in my right hand for more than a few seconds - but I can type, and use Vi, all day).

    25. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      ha ha ... a bluetooth keyboard with a single key labelled "ESC". Would probably cost around $50 and in a few months would be a security vector or something that corrupts all the data

      No silly, the USB-C version is only $30. Except, you can't use that whilst charging..... ;-P

    26. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by hercludes · · Score: 1

      Escape requires me to stretchy my pinky to the upper left part of the keyboard. ctrl+[ does not require anything as the resting position of my hand includes ctrl (caps lock) and [

    27. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was perfectly ergonomic till they moved CTRL from where it belongs and put caps lock in it's place.

    28. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Of course, this change makes using vi damn near impossible. This is all part of the Eric Conspiracy to force us to use Emacs.

      How can you have Escape Meta Alt Control Shift without Escape?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Come ro think of it how du you dugest I get out of insert mode in vim without using esc?

      I dugest you use CTRL-[

    30. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Snufu · · Score: 1

      On the next episode of "Beard Wars":

      Presidenteloco: "Ctrl+Anything is not ergonomic."
      RMS: "You're going down!!" CTRL-META-BODYSLAM

    31. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Anything is not ergonomic.

      If you spend serious hours and days and weeks and months and years programming or doing IT admin, your hands will get damaged with the repeated stretches and twists needed to do Ctrl+whatever.

      I'll bet you don't play guitar, saxophone, or piano.

      Use your goddamned left pinky, curled comfortably back, to hold the Ctrl key. It has absolutely no effect on your wrist position, or on the mobility and targeting of your other fingers.

    32. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I bet you can buy a bluetooth connected escape key.

      you could put an esp8266 inside a tiny box and have a single ESC key on it. small coin cell battery or two.

      perhaps the model could be: iGiveup

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    33. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Sure, but remember all the customers who petitioned to Apple to remove those keys. There must have been, what, 5 or 6 of them?

      Think of the savings in weight that will result. Innovation, baby, innovation!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    34. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by rthille · · Score: 1

      Wait, you use Esc, not the Meta key? Isn't that a giant PITA?

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    35. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Raenex · · Score: 2

      Ctrl+Anything is not ergonomic.

      It's quite ergonomic -- as long as you make caps lock act like control. Just google how to do so for your platform and give caps lock the boot.

    36. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I switch keyboard layouts between US/SE using caps lock just to be able to use array indexing without breaking my fingers.

    37. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      The laptop in the picture has what seems like a "contextual" OLED display (some are calling it Magic Toolbar display) on the top.

      Ugh, they've reinvented Lenovo's ill-fated "adaptive keyboard", the one where everyone skipped that entire generation of ultrabooks if they could, either sticking with the Gen1 or trading up to the Gen3 when they realised how awful it was. Apple, read the Lenovo forums for comments on the Gen2 keyboard. There are even howtos on hacking OEM-channel Gen1 keyboards onto the adaptive-keyboard Gen2 to make them less awful. Or look at the secondary-market prices for Gen2's, they're easier to get and cheaper than the much older Gen1's. After the Gen3 came out you could buy Gen2s by the pallet-load as everyone ditched them.

    38. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Macs don't have an Alt-Gr

    39. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      YOU CAN PRY MY CAPS LOCK KEY FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!

      --
      (Yes, Slashdot filter, I know using all caps is like yelling, that's the point of the joke, I'll just add some more text in small caps to satisfy you, ok?)

    40. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I called this a week ago.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to have trouble finding the apostrophe.

    42. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by bn-7bc · · Score: 2

      That made mi smil in the morning, thsnk you. On a different note, I was not drunk, I just tend to miss my own typos esp at night when I'm somewahat tired, sorry for any inconvinience :). Have a nice day

    43. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin (because that first part is in reference to nazis) and Poe in the same post. Well played!

    44. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no serious programmer or system admin will buy overpriced inferior product, like this one.

    45. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      My US/Russian keyboard laptop has [ next to P, as does a UK, Italian, Croatian, Czech, Slovak and Spanish keyboard. Latin American has it next to Ã'.

      Not really.

      "[" may be *originally printed* on the key as the main character (and then further decorated with a sticker for the local key), but that's not where it really is, unless you switch to English layout.

      Want to send Ctrl+[ ?

      Not going to work if [ is AltGr+F in the first place, and AltGr is Ctrl+Alt together.

    46. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows key isn't useless. Awesome wm needs that one all the time.

    47. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      So now we need 2 keys to escape instead of one? Just like we need multiple key mashes just to get a screenshot instead of one? This isn't efficiency, this is some prissy designer making keyboard into their notion of "pretty". To hell with that kind of human rubbish

    48. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Useful for many things, not just emacs. Are they trying to drive away tech people?

    49. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by houghi · · Score: 1

      This is why I use a qwery keyboard. azerty is the standard where Ilive. Only when I started using a qwerty did I understand why some things where as they where.
      Search down and up is / and ? because it is on the same key.
      Would be the same as if the search doan would be à and up %. No other erason then that they are on the same key on an azerty keyboard.

      The extra advantage is that I use my own keyboard at work and nbody will ever sit where I am, because of that. I also use a trackball instead of a mouse and more than once this resulted in me typing in the admin password for the IT person as they where unable to get themselves logged in. (Moste are able to do so)

      And of all the horrible things they do on a keyboard, the â is the worst. ALT-GR+e. So you need two hands to type it or move your right hand and use yiur left thumb for the AltGR which is just as horrible to do.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    50. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, a year in Japan made me wonder how they get any development work done. The keyboard layout is really not conducive to work in C-style syntax languages.
      https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/ajhartley/140821636/
      Even ignoring the moon runes, it's got problems, no back-tick, minus and underscore are inverted vs a sensible keyboard, and the space bar is tiny.
      It's modal as well, so typing Japanese means switching to a mode that loses access to all the non-alpha characters. It's just so slow!

    51. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > your hands will get damaged with the repeated stretches and twists needed to do Ctrl+whatever.
      that's only 20% of the damage, the remaining 80% is inflicted during masturbation

    52. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Somehow, you post has made me really want one of these: a 15cm square escape key, with 'Escape!' written in large letters across it, that I can hammer with a fist sounds like an excellent idea. You just need another one that has control-Z (or command-Z) next to it...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    53. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      My US/Russian keyboard laptop has [ next to P, as does a UK, Italian, Croatian, Czech, Slovak and Spanish keyboard. Latin American has it next to Ñ. Must be hell to access array indices if you don't have one of them...

      That's complete bollocks. You totally made that up, didn't you?

      Spanish and Italian have next to 'P', yes, but you need Alt-Gr to get at it.

      Croatian, Czech, Slovak keyboards have it on the 'F' and 'G' keys.

      --
      No sig today...
    54. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by AntEater · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous! I've been using Emacs for almost two decades as a sysadmin and developer and use the control key combinations thousands of times a day. The arthritis and RSI have never gotten in the way of me being able to do my job in any significant manner.

      Honestly, I do find the Ctrl+[ key combination more ergonomic than removing my fingers from the home row to hit the escape key.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    55. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could all that we key or stream
      be but a scream within a scream

    56. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Funny but improbable. RMS is not the body slamming type.

    57. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called bravery.

    58. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Thinly-veiled vi troll.

    59. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Shogun37 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an old Dilbert strip. "It only has one button, and we press it before it leaves the factory."

    60. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by zentigger · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the old Sun keyboard layout? I wonder if I could resurrect one of those with a USB interface...

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

    61. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by zentigger · · Score: 1

      If you are that concerned about your ergonomics, you should probably have a real keyboard to work on anyway. The built-in laptop keyboard is about as ergonomic as a sack of bricks.

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

    62. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      You must live in a country which has a nice '[' key on the keyboard. Most keyboards in the world access those symbols with Alt-Gr.

      (Sucks to be them, I know...but this will make it suck even worse)

      Most of my keyboards have the Alt Gr stuff. That doesn't mean I have to use the stupid localized layout that's printed on the keys. I use UK or US layouts because I want to enjoy programming and Unix shells without tying my fingers in a granny knot. http://iki.fi/teknohog/rants/k...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    63. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can comfortably hit ESC with my ring finger while keeping my index finger touching the F key (quick return to home row), but I realize that's not possible for everyone. I find that quicker and more accurate (single-hand coordination) on a keyboard I'm familiar with than Ctrl+[, which requires coordination of your two least dexterous (and sinistrous, I suppose) fingers.

      I know I can use Alt+, but the position of the Alt key varies more between modern keyboards (not everything looks like an IBM Model M) than CTRL in my experience.

      And I'm not interested in using increasingly more complicated (and often non-portable) key mapping hacks.

      Either I don't know how to use Vim, or I just don't know how to use it your way. Guessing the latter, so fuck off.

    64. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by syntotic · · Score: 1

      All of you still DO NOT UNDERSTAND. They do not want you to use computers, but first they have to take the money off you, so they keep selling them. It will be clearer once you get reduced to single texts posted in reply to... and nothing else possible.

    65. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the control key is in the right place, you can use the "partial fist method" which allows striking the control key with the most distal knuckle of the pinky finger with pronating the wrist. Score!

    66. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the old Sun keyboard layout?

      Yep, and that's what I learned Emacs on. I've set caps lock to be an extra control key on every PC I've owned ever since.

    67. Re:How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Emacs: it's yoga for your fingers.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    68. Re: How is everyone supposed to use Emacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rebind capslick to esc, like everyone else. We're weren't using capslock already, were you?

  2. What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Windows machine with a Ctrl-Alt-Del available only via a contextual input area;
    what could go wrong?

    1. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      macbooks freeze all the time. the touchpad quits clicking. the only thing that works is holding down the power key to reboot.

      then don't get me started with the lock screen where it won't authenticate your password (just hangs until it presumably times out) and the only fix is to reboot the computer by holding the power key.

      many things can be done in software, but a power button should never be one of them.

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong by npslider · · Score: 1, Troll

      Windows doesn't crash anymore. Ctrl-Alt-Del is there to provide emotional comfort for those who do not have enough courage to move on. ;)

    3. Re: What could possibly go wrong by swalve · · Score: 1

      Computer power buttons have been software since the 90s. The difference is that it was not only controlled by the OS.

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong by klubar · · Score: 2

      Ctrl-alt-del is really there to lock your screen, log in, change password, change user and maybe start the task manager.

      Oh wait, you're not on domain-joined machine?

    5. Re: What could possibly go wrong by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      macbooks freeze all the time.

      You either have a hardware problem or you're installing OSes too soon after they are released. I generally avoid installing 10.x.0 and 10.x.1 for all values of x, and I can count the number of freezes I've seen in the past fifteen years on one hand.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:What could possibly go wrong by npslider · · Score: 1

      I like to use Windows Key + L to lock my computer.

      As for the rest... yes my domain joined computers still do prefer I use the three fingered salute.

      Does Windows 10 still require Ctrl-Alt-Del for domain login?

    7. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Falos · · Score: 2

      Ctrl+Shift+Esc for instant task manager.

      Oh wait esc keys aren't hip anymore. Never mind.

    8. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to imagine. I'm using a Windows tablet right now. It has three buttons: power, volume up, volume down. There's no way to type Ctrl-Alt-Del. When the machine crashes, I hold down the power button.

      Now you might be implying that abruptly powering off Windows would corrupt the file system, but that kind of wrong thinking belongs in another decade. Windows has used self-repairing journaled file systems for 15 years. Journaled file systems for Linux entered common use in the same year, and you don't think twice about what happens to the file system on your Linux box or Android phone when it loses power.

      2001 was the year of the journaled file system almost everywhere, except Apple didn't make it a standard feature of OSX until 2003. Apple was the late adopter, so really you should be asking, will I need to run fsck on my Mac again today?

    9. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I had to do this a couple times this month so far. If the software locks up so badly that even the mouse won't work, then it's practically guaranteed that the new specialized touch enabled strip isn't going to work either. Of course, if they had user replaceable batteries you could just power the thing down that way, but no...

    10. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Mine freezes a lot. I think it's getting close to dying though as it's overheating a lot. Macbook is nice to use but really not designed for long term reliability, rather designed to be replaced often and generate profits.

    11. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ha! Why is this not modded funny?

    12. Re: What could possibly go wrong by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Not exactly. They send a software signal, then after some time, they hard power off the system. Try pressing and holding it for a bit.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:What could possibly go wrong by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      CTRL-ALT-DEL is really used more in DOS than it is in Windows. The only time you use it is at login (if enforced by group policy), or maybe to bring up task manager, and there are other ways to do that too.

      What's funny is that Microsoft ADDS keys to a standard keyboard, and Apple wants to take them away!

    14. Re: What could possibly go wrong by swalve · · Score: 1

      Right. And that mechanism is handled via some kind of software in a chip somewhere on the board. Rather than a physical switch yanking the power.

    15. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Let me try Ctrl-Alt-Del in DOSBox. No... nothing is happening,

    16. Re: What could possibly go wrong by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Right. And that mechanism is handled via some kind of software in a chip somewhere on the board. Rather than a physical switch yanking the power.

      Well, conventionally that sort of thing is referred to as firmware. First press is all software: it notifies the OS and the OS can do what it likes. Long press is handled by some embedded mechanism and then cuts the power.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    17. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No... that mechanism is handled via circuitry in the power supply. No software is involved unless you suggest that the switching action of transistors is caused by software.

    18. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try cleaning your heatsinks & fans?, can make a huge difference to heating and stability issues

    19. Re:What could possibly go wrong by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Remember, taking stuff away is marketed as "courage."

    20. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, just pop out the battery !!!!

    21. Re:What could possibly go wrong by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Does Windows 10 still require Ctrl-Alt-Del for domain login?

      No

    22. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Yes, I will suggest that the switching action of transistors is caused by software. And, further, that software is caused by the switching action of transistors.

      When you hold down the power key, some firmware somewhere, in a little microcontroller, starts a timer. When that timer expires, that firmware causes a transistor to be switched, which then cuts the power. It doesn't cut the power from everything, of course, since that same microcontroller is the one that causes the 'on switch' to actually turn the power back on again.

      There's even a microcontroller in the charger, that's responsible for controlling current, and presumably for turning that LED orange or green, or whatever. It's an MSP430, so let's assume that they've got an MSP430 looking after the power button too. Some MSP430's have built-in touch controllers, and since they run in sleep mode on nanoamps, it's safe to keep them "on", and waiting for the power button to be touched.

    23. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Clean the fans out. The only macbook that I ever had that actually died was one of those older ones with the little catches the popped out of the screen when you closed it. Real ancient. The newer ones seem pretty damn reliable to me.

    24. Re: What could possibly go wrong by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nothing. You would obviously just remove and re-insert the battery. But when they start making the battery non-replaceable (they haven't stooped *that* low yet... have they?), then you'll be shit out of luck.

    25. Re: What could possibly go wrong by lgw · · Score: 1

      My PCs have real, no-nonsense power switches in addition to the soft button. When the AI takes over, I'll be ready!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      To clarify, it requires hitting enter.
      Unless you hit enter first, then sometimes it requires a mouse click.
      But if you click the mouse first, sometimes you have to hit enter.
      Occasionally, after banging both the mouse and the enter key without result, you can fall back on Ctrl-Alt-Del to get it to snap out of it.

      Am I the only one that has this problem?

    27. Re: What could possibly go wrong by ewibble · · Score: 1

      It is irrelevant, long power press has never failed me, were software shutdown, or system hanging, so I cannot do a shutdown has, pair that with a possibly non-removable battery then your computer is useless until your battery goes flat.

    28. Re: What could possibly go wrong by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Just because it doesn't have a dedicated power button doesn't mean it relies on the OS to power off. Even smart phones have button combo's that will bypass the OS and power the device off. This is probably no different.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    29. Re: What could possibly go wrong by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      I had to do this a couple times this month so far. If the software locks up so badly that even the mouse won't work, then it's practically guaranteed that the new specialized touch enabled strip isn't going to work either. Of course, if they had user replaceable batteries you could just power the thing down that way, but no...

      So either they use a key-combo to bypass the OS for power (iPhones do this, for example, if you press-hold the home and power button on the rare occasions that one locks up) or the touch strip isn't run by the OS, but is running it's own mini-os and dedicated hardware.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    30. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember the last time I saw a kernel panic on my laptop. I do remember thinking "oh cool" when I did tho.

    31. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No. no firmware is involved any more than firmware is involved in making current conduct in only one direction in a diode. Yes pressing the power button sends a signal but this signal is connected via raw transistor logic. No firmware is involved at all

    32. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Oh... I forgot to mention... the delay could actually caused by a capacitor, the controlled time it takes to charge being determined by the value of a resistor in series with it. There are any number of resistor-capacitor combinations that you could use to achieve a three second delay, and I would expect that it might vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, or be determined by product availability. Once the capacitor has a sufficient charge, it exceeds the ttl threshold of a "high" signal. which is then relayed through a pair of transistors with a secondary RC network that actually turn the power supply off. I've built one of these in my electronics class that I took in university in the 1990's, and although the one that I built was not specifically for PC's, there's no reason that PC's would use something any different. It's cheap, easy, and has virtually zero possibility of failure.

    33. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you hold down the power key, some firmware somewhere, in a little microcontroller, starts a timer.

      It's all done in hardware, no software nor firmware. Check out Intel's PCH datasheet:
      http://www.intel.com/content/d...

      5.13.8.1
      PWRBTN# (Power Button)
      The PCH PWRBTN# signal operates as a "Fixed Power Button" as described in the Advanced Configuration and Power Interface, Version 2.0b. PWRBTN# signal has a 16 ms de-bounce on the input. The state transition descriptions are included in Table 5-32. The transitions start as soon as the PWRBTN# is pressed (but after the debounce logic), and does not depend on when the Power Button is released.

      Present State: S0-S4
      Event: PWRBTN# held low for at least 4 consecutive seconds
      Action: Unconditional transition to S5 state and if Deep Sx is enabled and conditions are met per Section 5.13.7.6, the system will then transition to Deep Ss
      Comment: No dependence on processor (DMI Messages) or any other subsystem.

    34. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How? Just blow into those really tiny slots on the side?

    35. Re:What could possibly go wrong by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Now you might be implying that abruptly powering off Windows would corrupt the file system, but that kind of wrong thinking belongs in another decade. Windows has used self-repairing journaled file systems for 15 years. Journaled file systems for Linux entered common use in the same year, and you don't think twice about what happens to the file system on your Linux box or Android phone when it loses power.

      Well, yes, I do. Every day. For a living.

      File system journals (and fsck) help maintain file system integrity, not file integrity nor medium integrity. It's only the middle layer.

      If a program has only written half the data to the OS drivers by the time power goes, and those writes are replayed from the journal upon boot, you have a working file system but a corrupt file. I much prefer to be able to signal the apps to complete their output and shut down gracefully.

      Likewise, cutting the power during a physical write can cause all sorts of problems, especially on media where the controller lies about whether a write is finished in order to improve write speeds. That includes most consumer hard drives and removable media. The OS removes the write from the journal as committed, while in reality it's still being handled by the hardware. Unless you have a hardware disk controller with battery backup, and turn write caching off on the physical media, this is a very real cause of corruption for power outages, and one a journal can do nothing about.

      You mention Android phones. With microSD cards, where there generally is no way to disable caching, the problem is so bad that most phones make it incredibly hard to not do a controlled shutdown. But find that hidden reset switch in your phone, and hit it a few times during operation, and you will likely have corruptions, despite journaled file systems.

      Incidentally, the use of non-enterprise journaled file systems is an exploit vector for intruders. If they can find a way to reset the system, and the journal replay helpfully makes valid files out of half-written temporary files, there can be a wealth of information there that shouldn't have been accessible. Good enterprise file systems like JFS and XFS will err on the side of caution and zero files that were read locked and partially written (causing a lot of complaints from those who don't understand why), while more commonly used file systems err on the side of retaining data over security.

    36. Re:What could possibly go wrong by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that has this problem?

      Yes.

    37. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The documentation you posted is descriptive not prescriptive and the described functions could be implemented in a hundred different ways.

    38. Re: What could possibly go wrong by oobayly · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I added a hard reset to my RF key fob controlled Arduino light controller. One of the buttons was used to charge a capacitor which then pulled down the reset pin.

      No software needed (or at least no software I wrote). The PT2272 did the hard RF work.

    39. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a fucking aspie.

    40. Re: What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reset the PRAM and the SMC; should stop the overheating problem (really!)

      I've certainly had issues with Apple kit but my current Macbook is _eight_ years old and (worn keycaps and very soft keyboard notwithstanding) still looks and works like new. I'm on my second battery mind you (and it's getting old at that), I had to replace the power supply (bad connector design originally, new one fine), and I've upgraded RAM and put in an SSD (I'm on my second SSD, but that was my fault for buying a Crucial V3).

      Obviously, the lack of this kind of upgradeability bothers me (quite a bit) about the current lineup. But in general the current hardware is highly reliable, and more to the point the repair and service back end is impressive.

      More generally I might not be able to afford to upgrade simply because of changing economic circumstances (personal and national)

    41. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      So, is holding the button down for more than one second implemented by charging a capacitor until it reaches a certain voltage, and triggering the shutdown that way? That seems extremely unlikely.

    42. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Possibly this might entail removing some screws.

    43. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is almost certainly how it is done... it is by far the cheapest and most reliable way to implement a switch when you want to have a timer on how long it is held.

    44. Re:What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl-shift-ESC opens up task manager, which lets you kill apps & processes.

      It's true tho, that Win doesn't crash anymore, I've had my main comp up & running for half a year straight now....However, tasks still do crash & burn every now and then.

      Learn the difference between OS and rest of the software on your comp.

    45. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      For real?

      Meanwhile, back in the real world, the power button on a macbook pro is managed by this chip. In actual fact, the power button is part of the keyboard itself, on the macbook air it's not even a separate-looking button, it's just another key. Since the microcontroller part is on the board already, and in addition to the capacitor you'd also need a voltage reference, a comparator, a discharge circuit (for when the power button is released), etcetera, do you really believe that a hardware designer is going to bother with any of those parts when it can be done in firmware for zero board cost?

      Reliability-wise, if the SMSC chip dies, or contains broken firmware, there would be little point in being able to "turn the laptop off" - which as we know doesn't really mean 'off', since power will still be being provided to that chip, but anyway - since the laptop would be completely dead.

    46. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

      and in addition to the capacitor you'd also need a voltage reference, a comparator, a discharge circuit

      No, no, and no.

      TTL logic is high or low. There is no in-between, so you do not need a voltage reference or comparator to know when the appropriate charging point is reached. Using known values of resistance and capacitance, you can manually calculate how long it will take for a given capacitor in series with a given resistance to charge enough to get to what would be recognized as a TTL high signal. Quantum fluctuations may result in changes to this value on the order of picoseconds to the actual timing, but this is an on-off switch we are talking about, so such tiny variances will not generally affect any real-world use case. Further, being a few picoseconds off is still better than the nanosecond or worse granularity that you'd typically achieve doing it in firmware.

      Discharging the capacitor after power is cut can be accomplished via a pull-down resistor to ground... so unless you consider one resistor a "circuit", no discharge circuit is required.

      Even without buying the parts in bulk, the parts for this are ridiculously and ubiquitous.

      The microcontroller on the main board has plenty of other things to do, and tying it up dealing with some firmware logic for powering down would be wasteful in terms of power usage, at least. The most sane thing for it to do would be to send a signal to the power off circuitry built into the power supply.

    47. Re: What could possibly go wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1
      (Moral of the story.... don't try and post something attempting to sound coherent when I first wake up... I made a couple of grammatical errors and Freudian slips there. I'll attempt to enumerate them so that hopefully I don't sound as stupid as I think I made myself look).

      I feel like I must have been only semi-conscious when I typed "quantum fluctuations"... Too much star trek or something.

      While the variances in exactly what levels are taken as TTL high vs low (and indeed the function of all semiconductors) are indeed caused by quantum-level effects, "quantum fluctuations" is a specific term in physics that is not really directly connected to why those variations occur. The term that I meant to type was quantum-level effects, not quantum fluctuations.

      Also, I meant that the parts for this are ubiquitously *CHEAP* and ubiquitous.

      Hmmm.... I thought I saw one other thing there that made me grossly ashamed to have posted it (oh, for a delete post or edit post button), but I don't see it right now.

      My point remains... while doing this with a microcontroller executing firmware instructions or even microcode is certainly possible, it would not generally be very practical. While I've described the circuitry involved in terms of simple TTL components, this could easily be printed onto silicon as part of an IC package that may do many other things (and could even be a part of a microntroller IC), but even then, it would still not be firmware managing the power off button.

    48. Re: What could possibly go wrong by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Too much star trek or something.

      I disagree. This is not possible.

      I don't know man, it just seems to me that doing it in firmware costs zero (yes, yes, I know software isn't free, but you know what I mean). Whereas doing it with parts, costs non-zero. I happen to work with hardware designers and firmware engineers, and they argue over cents, and square mm of board area. There is simply no way that they would waste parts and board space when the same job can be done with a few lines of code in a microcontroller that's already on the board. Have you seen the size of the board in the latest macbooks? How about in the iphone, or the ipod touch? It's bonkers. Square millimeters count. And, of course, there is no reliability issue. If that microcontroller crashes (!!) or isn't working in some other way, then your entire PC is dead, and being unable to use the power button to turn it off (or on) is a moot point. Nothing's ever actually off these days anyway, it just doesn't need to be. My most recent project used a single pushbutton to turn on and off, and of course, I did that in software. A timer when you hold the button down, driven by interrupts, and a sleep mode that waits for a falling edge on the button, with an internal pullup. Parts count, one, the button itself. Debouncing in software. I even got the pullup resistor for free, since it's just a matter of setting a register inside the chip. When the chip wakes up, it turns on a step-up DC converter in order to power the rest of the board, which would be much harder to achieve with discrete logic, and a timing capacitor, and so-on. Power usage when "off", 9 nanoamps. That's less than the internal leakage of the batteries. You just can't get that with discrete components.

      Added to which is the fact that you can fiddle around with the software right up until you ship (well.... ish...), but if you decide that you need a different timing for your power switch, or different behaviour altogether, you're probably looking at a board revision. And no-one likes those.

      this could easily be printed onto silicon as part of an IC package that may do many other things

      Capacitors on ICs are of the order of picofarads, and cost quite alot of package space. No-one is using them for timing.

  3. Simplicity can only go so far by TodPunk · · Score: 2

    I'm imagining that the "make things better by simplifying" can only go so far. I'm not saying we've definitively reached such a point with Macs, but they keep learning that some of these "refinements" are mistakes, like not being able to right-click. Is trying to reduce vectors of interaction for their devices really their entire legacy?

    Mac is definitely the "simpler" brand, and draws a lot of users from that brand. I just wonder if it's not a long-term shoot-yourself-in-the-foot to limit yourself so (both for their users and for the company itself).

    --
    This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
    1. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by npslider · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I suppose the Esc Key will be an option on the new OLED panel. Perhaps it's not lost, just moved.

    2. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Been able to right click for decades.... Why do you guys that have zero experience with a MAC keep trying to bring that fake piece of info Up?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, what vi user doesn't carry a 60% keyboard with them in these days of the cheap, custom 60% keyboards? As long as the main keyboard is usable at all, I don't really care. When I am sat down long enough for a serious session, I am already deploying my 60% keyboard.

    4. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by saider · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a Dilbert...

      Dilbert: What makes your product better?
      Salesguy: Well, our keyboard is so simple it only has one button, and we press it for you at the factory.
      Dilbert: What happens when I press the button?
      Salesguy: Woa, Woa, Woa, - I'm getting in over my head here.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    5. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is going to work very well for the majority of us who rely on that particular key. If this rumor is true, it is one of the few legitimately infuriating things Apple will have done with their products.

      The place to do this paritcularly benighted thing is in the macbook and "air" line for college kids majoring in basket weaving and their later life selves: marketing bots. For the technical world, the esc key is still very, very important. You shouldn't drop it on your "pro" line, for "profesionals" who actually work for a living. The best part about OS X is that it's still basically BSD and you can ignore the UI and badly implemented software, this undermines that.

       

    6. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by npslider · · Score: 2

      Well, on the upside, technically, Apple's new feature is actually a find of Biblical proportions.

      They have done what no other has managed to do. EVER.

      They finally found the ANY key and are giving it to us on a shiny platter.

    7. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Been able to right click for decades....

      It only works if apps support it. If it's not an expected feature available to the end user as default then it's not likely to be exploited by anyone.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by macs4all · · Score: 0

      I'm imagining that the "make things better by simplifying" can only go so far. I'm not saying we've definitively reached such a point with Macs, but they keep learning that some of these "refinements" are mistakes, like not being able to right-click. Is trying to reduce vectors of interaction for their devices really their entire legacy?

      Mac is definitely the "simpler" brand, and draws a lot of users from that brand. I just wonder if it's not a long-term shoot-yourself-in-the-foot to limit yourself so (both for their users and for the company itself).

      1997 called and wants its Single Button Mouse meme back.

      Because it was then (or possibly earlier) that Macs began supporting Right-Click. Yes, that's right: Nearly TWENTY YEARS AGO.

      BTW, on a Trackpad Mac, it's two-finger click (early Mac models with trackpad had it at Right-Bottom-Corner Click, IIRC). But with a Mouse, any Mac has supported Right-Click directly since MacOS (Classic) 8 or 8.5, IIRC. OS X has ALWAYS supported Right-Click.

    9. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I suppose the Esc Key will be an option on the new OLED panel. Perhaps it's not lost, just moved.

      Of COURSE that's what it is. Jeezus!

      I would imagine that "Esc" comes up as an option on the same "strip" (or Magic Toolbar) as the F-Key set.

      From what I understand, TouchID is also integrated into the Magic Toolbar, too.

    10. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Been able to right click for decades....

      It only works if apps support it. If it's not an expected feature available to the end user as default then it's not likely to be exploited by anyone.

      They all do. I hope you enjoy furiously clicking around on your boyfriend's Mac trying to prove me wrong.

    11. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by mark-t · · Score: 2

      If this rumor is true, it is one of the few legitimately infuriating things Apple will have done with their products.

      (Raised eyebrow)

      "Few"???

      I'm not sure if you're trying to be deliberately ironic or what....

      I can't recall the last time Apple made a change that actually turned out to be a good one. They've probably done it at some points in the past, but I can't think of any offhand.

    12. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL :-)

    13. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by vux984 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Been able to right click for decades.... Why do you guys that have zero experience with a MAC keep trying to bring that fake piece of info Up?"

      Decades? Sure, you've been able to right click in OSX for as long as I can remember.

      Sure. Just not with the mice apple sold you.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      From 1983 to 2005 all apple sold was one button mice. The 2005 mighty mouse was the first one that actually had a 'right click'.

      That said the mighty mouse/magic mouse being multitouch devices with capacitive touch continued to make right clicking far less discoverable to users than a typical PC mouse which clearly had 2 clickable surfaces, one on the left, and one on the right.

      And that continues even to today. And frankly the apple might/magic mice are utter garbage; designed for people who spend more time admiring their mouse then using it.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    14. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, my 386 has an extra backslash key with no label on it. Guess what got put on it? :)

      We haven't had a real power switch since then anyways unless you got lucky on your PSU and got a switch in the back...

    15. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining that the "make things better by simplifying" can only go so far

      Oh dear, I just had a flashback to this.

      One step closer, my friends...one step closer to the dream...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    16. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't recall the last time Apple made a change that actually turned out to be a good one. They've probably done it at some points in the past, but I can't think of any offhand.

      ...and I wouldn't much care if all their foolishness were restricted to their own products. But NO! All the other companies want to emulate them. The worst thing is their damnable fixation on design over usability. They've given us a whole generation of people that can't be happy except if they can have "stylish" things like icons that all look alike or text that's too hard to read. That company is a blight on the earth.

    17. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U aapl h4t34 1m r1tng bck 2 u frm da ftr3 0n my macb00k n da yr 2033
      aapl simp1fy kbd r0ckz

      l0tz 0f th0z kyz u uzd r uzl3zz!!!!!

    18. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      Yes, and most apps even support it. But the anti-right click heritage of the mac still rears it's ugly head in many applications in the form of not really utilizing the right click well. Hint, if you aren't right clicking at least as often as you are left clicking, your applications aren't utilizing the right click to it's full capacity.

    19. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      It only works if apps support it. If it's not an expected feature available to the end user as default then it's not likely to be exploited by anyone.

      Unlike Windows, where right-click is automatically built into any app, and the OS scans the executable looking for likely candidates to populate a little popup window with....

      Of course it only "works if apps support it". That's a given. Apps have to support the features they support. But every single app on OSX that I've ever used supports it, especially anything aimed at developers.

    20. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The magic mouse is great. Scrolling left and right and a convenient scroll is worth the weird right-click, short-ish battery life and the reboots when Bluetooth goes haywire.

      Ok, Apple sucks, but they suck less than the competition.

    21. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by TodPunk · · Score: 2

      I specifically brought it up as an accessible example of the history. For those that don't use Macs it's an important and well-known example. I don't think it was a poor choice just because of its age.

      --
      This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
    22. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by scatbomb · · Score: 1

      Been able to right click for decades.... Why do you guys that have zero experience with a MAC keep trying to bring that fake piece of info Up?

      The first Apple mouse to have right click was the "mighty mouse" released in 2005. So I guess technically it has been longer than 1 decade, but maybe "decades" is an exaggeration... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    23. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The touchpads do right-clicks very well, and external touchpads replaced mice awhile ago. Moreover, since when do people who put their computer to any serious work stick with the crap mouse manufacturers provide?

      It's a non-issue. I was once kind of an issue, but not a huge one, so the bafflement at why anyone would bring it up today is understandable. It's simply become a stupid, anachronistic thing people say.

      How about the fact that Macs have allowed one to do things in Bash since OSX, while Windows just introduced a hacky way to do so? How about the perversity of producing a general-purpose OS that isn't Unixy at its core? And you bitch about the mouse, as if you're some deep thinking, tech-aware, superior to all those dumb consumers.

    24. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup this is the the worst case scenario.

    25. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even artists use the escape key (though not exclusively), it's how you get out of whatever the fuck you got yourself into in Photoshop (selections, line tools, etc). It can be done other ways but who remembers the specific key shortcut for "deselect"?

    26. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this meme should be replaced with stupidity of putting a charging port on the bottom of a mouse meme

    27. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the one spreading fake info. I think people with "zero experience" with a MAC would ASSUME they have right click, as that is all they'd expect coming from PC's. It would be the ones with "some experience" who would be saying they don't have right clicks.But since I know that 2 button mice wasn't available 17 years ago (fuck whatever school admin put Macs in our school in the ass), then I'll call bullshit on your "decades". The 's' in decades means two or more.

      Since I've only ever sat down at a Mac with a single mouse button, this would be why I'm led to believe this. I've seen pictures of third party mice, so I knew its been there for years.

      I just went and googled "when did macs get right click", and not only could I not find an easy answer, I just kept finding more and more stuff about Apple guidelines for single mouse click operation. Even when Apple introduced Mighty Mouse in 2005, it had multiple buttons, but I still don't see "right click"! In that google search, one of the returned pages had the headline, "Apple Just Canceled The Right Click".

      Douche.

    28. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Been able to right click for decades.... Why do you guys that have zero experience with a MAC keep trying to bring that fake piece of info Up?

      Yes! Decades.

      Before trackpads, it was simply Ctrl-click.
      With trackpads, it is simply a two-finger click. Or Ctrl-click. Or two-button mouse.

      Duh.

    29. Re: Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the context menu, there's also a key to bring it up.

      There's nothing automatic about it, developers have to choose what to put there, the order, accelerator keys etc.

    30. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl-Click has worked for right click since Mac OS 8. So yes, you could right click even with the single button mouse.

    31. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer for when (built into the OS) is Mac OS 8 which would be 1997.

    32. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Shane_Optima · · Score: 2

      Devil's Advocate:

      * Magnetic cables are freakin' awesome but are one of the few things that haven't been widely copied (I'm assuming due to patent or something.)

      * I think the iPad was sort of innovative... was there really no Android version in the works beforehand? I know e-ink readers were pretty widespread before then. Regardless, the "just make a big phone, but without the phone" approach was a very wise choice (even if it was obvious in retrospect) and they certainly deserve kudos they were the first ones to do it. I dearly wish removable keyboards and docks were more widespread and many, many things could be said about the walled gardens and tragic demise of the netbook but on the whole, it's hard not to give them this one.

      * Capacitive screens, while sometimes leading to annoying UIs, never became widespread until after the iPhone[1]. This is a slightly double-edged sword, as it ushered in an era of glass screens, but the net UI win and normal wear and tear durability improvements (i.e. if it doesn't shatter, it can last a lot longer than resistive) can't be ignored. (I did actually own a plastic capacitive touchscreen and it was pretty awesome from a durability standpoint but the friction sucked.)

      * Objective-C is a much better, more optimizable and more elegant language than Java (and Cocoa was a powerful platform long before JVM began to get interesting.) Java would be a pretty horrible language if not for the massive amount of work that's gone into optimizing it and the fact so it does make it a bit harder for mediocre coders to crank out catastrophically bad code.

      * OS X is considerably better than Windows or OS 9. From what I hear. [2]

      * Building on what I allude to in footnote 1, if we're just talking about "changes" here (and not actual industry innovations), anytime Apple has copied an Android feature it's turned out pretty well for them...especially since they always manage to convince people that they were the ones that invented it. They went from " Independent app devs? AhahahahaGo FUCK yourselves. We don't want you crapping up our walled garden!" to millions of dorky freshmen making "there's an app for that!" jokes in just a couple years, and from my understanding you have Google to thank for that.

      * I guess chiclet keyboards aren't that bad... they do tend to be more durable than other laptop keyboards, and they're only slightly more cumbersome to use once you get over the learning curve. But oh, to live in an alternate universe where they stuck a Cherry MX style mechanical keyboard in there and everyone else rushed to copy that instead...

      1. And honestly, the capacitive screen was the only thing they really got right with the iPhone (which was nice, because they were relatively rare/expensive prior to the first iPhone.) Other than that it was pretty goddamn inferior to the G1 and the N800, and they had to play catchup with really basic shit like MMS, 3G speeds (seriously! Who the hell builds an uber-expensive smartphone with a mandatory data plan but only EDGE speeds?) , customizable ringtones and an app marketplace that wasn't a locked-down nightmare. Of course, mainstream culture/media firmly asserts that it was the other way around and Android has supposedly been some crappy knockoff trying to play catchup with Apple.

      2. The sales pitch always sounds pretty weak to me though, when comparing it to any laptop that's known to run your favorite BSD or Linux distro well out of the box: "All of the benefits of *nix except it costs money to upgrade and it's much less configurable and there's a 30% Apple Tax, and there's no low end option at all if you just need a basic workhorse and even older machines on Craigslist sell for twice as much as they should! Yes, you heard that correctly... all of the benefits of *nix!!!!"

      Apple is one of those things you wish you could simply pass on and not have an opinion about (different strokes for different folks), but mainstream culture's rampant and unreasonable obsession forces you to know stuff and develop an opinion whether you want to or not. Detailed, cranky opinions.

    33. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by macs4all · · Score: 1

      this meme should be replaced with stupidity of putting a charging port on the bottom of a mouse meme

      Citation?

    34. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Objective-C is a much better, more optimizable and more elegant language

      Ok, that's enough smoking of the earthly remains of Steve Jobs for you. Objective-C is the least elegant language I've ever seen, and that includes assembly language for two different chip architectures. It clearly shows that the language came to be as a mix of two different languages, with nothing syntactically in common.

    35. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the first iMac I used. The fucking piece of garbage had a ONE BUTTON MOUSE! The beauty of that mouse was that it was a clear example of Apple's tendency to preserve face above all. Even a two-year-old knows a one button mouse if totally stupid, but Apple wouldn't change it because that change would have indicated that their initial choice was idiotic. So, they sat on it until they could later introduce a two button mouse and claim it was innovation.

    36. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter when they started supporting it. Even when they introduced the homosexually colored iMacs they were still including just single button mice. So, since 1997 you had to go out and buy more hardware to get up to the same level of functionality everyone else had been enjoying since day one. You're an Apple apologist, so it was never an issue for you. For everyone else with a much wider computing history it's one of Apples biggest mistakes among many.

    37. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Apple has always supported control-click for right click. It's over a decade since all Apple-supplied pointing devices have included a right-click interface (two-finger click on laptops for the last 6 years). It's built into most of the standard Cocoa view classes to produce a context menu and anything that involves text editing has a default one wired up, so all applications support it without needing any extra code.

      The Apple HIGs tell you not to rely on right click being possible, which turns out to be a really good thing if you need to use a touchscreen.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    38. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia

      Customer reviews on Apple's own propaganda headquarters. Read the comments. They're hilarious. Just about everyone hates the charging port being on the bottom.

      Now, which is the case here? Did you actually not know about one of Apple's products? That seems unlikely considering the amount of shilling and trolling you do on behalf of Apple. Or, did you in fact know about this shitty mouse and thought asking for a citation was a not so clever way to make it seem like someone else was mistaken while hoping that no one would actually double check? Yeah, that seems exactly like you.

    39. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by macs4all · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter when they started supporting it. Even when they introduced the homosexually colored iMacs they were still including just single button mice. So, since 1997 you had to go out and buy more hardware to get up to the same level of functionality everyone else had been enjoying since day one. You're an Apple apologist, so it was never an issue for you. For everyone else with a much wider computing history it's one of Apples biggest mistakes among many.

      Apple's research clearly showed that novice users preferred and understood a one-button-mouse significantly better than a multi-button mouse. This has been verified again and again.

      Honestly, how many times have you had a novice (and sometimes not-so-novice) Windows user ask "Which 'Click' ?" Right button or Left button?

      Well guess what? When there is only ONE button, that question, for some odd reason, just never comes up. This removes a "mental speedbump" for the user.

      And if you honestly want to call purchasing a bog-standard, $10 USB mouse "buy[ing] more hardware", you don't need to even OWN a computer. You just undermine your own argument with silly bullshit like that.

    40. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Ctrl-Click has worked for right click since Mac OS 8.

      Yes.

      So yes, you could right click even with the single button mouse.

      No.

      A 'right click' is to click on the right mouse button. A mouse that does not have a right mouse button cannot be right-clicked. Ctrl-click as an alternative way to send a right click is a fine workaround, but it is not a right click.

      This is important. Because while you and I might have abstracted 'right click' into an event that can be triggered by a) clicking the right mouse button, b) ctrl-clicking a singular mouse button, c) two finger tapping a touchpad, etc... the average person when instructed to right click ONLY knows to press the 'button on the right side of a mouse'.

      So mac applications (and mac users) don't use the right mouse button much because its functionality isn't very discoverable. Anyone with a two button mouse instinctively knows what a right mouse click is; and is apt to click it to see what happens -- so its functionality is very discoverable.

      Ctrl-click ... by comparison is arcane. Nobody is going to find that unless they are told. I mean, when was the last time you pushed the Command key, the escape key, and clicked at the same time? Maybe that does something in some application too... ;)

    41. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by SirCowMan · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for capacitive screens, they do shatter (or at least crack in the corners). I've got 3 iPad's, 2 older iPhones & iPod's, and a iPhone 6+ around here which are on at-least their second screen, with a couple other cracked Android phones to boot. The resistive layer on a resistive screen provides some additional level of durability in that regard, are tolerant of rain drops, don't register input before contact, have reflection free non-gloss matte screens, can be used through light gloves, and - care of fingernails - can be extremely accurate without obscuring what you're trying to touch with the bulk of your finger. I imagine this is why I'm still signing for packages on resistive screens. I still hate capacitive screens, particularly for soft-keyboards.

      Going with iOs for the tablets wasn't innovative (given the existance of netbooks as you mention), though it has been profitable. That the iPad would use iOs was no surprise, they like their long-tail app revenue, nor the gradual convergence of iOs and OS-X since... walled gardens et. al.; but the original iPad was oversized and underwhelming. Microsoft's courier project was arguably somewhat innovative, who knows, never happened. The original iPad though I have no love for. I have one, stuck on some old OS version which doesn't run Netflix, which means the kids don't even use it, so it hasn't aged well either.

      What allowed the iPad to succeed was not innovation, or some form of foresight of where the world was going, it was marketting - they beat out the path they wanted with their marketting dollars and brand-fanciers followed it. I wouldn't attribute much of Apple's current success, really, to hardware nor software design - they are first and foremostly a marketting company and have excelled in this respect. Absent this, they would not be in the marketplace today, their markups would be wholely unsustainable and iPad's I suspect would have been a flash in the pan, rapidly forgotten in the face of convertible netbooks or similar. They make glossy hardware and software which shows well in print and commercials, with a few interesting bullet points suitable for a single-sheet, despite the mid-level build build quality and software which is either too simple or too fragile to truely be utilitarian.

      For mechanical Apple keyboards, have a look at the Matias tactile line. Apple also used to make clicky alps-based keyboards. Can't stand the chicklet keyboards.

      I don't care much for what Apple sells but the kids and wife don't hold the same opinion. I get to deal with all their gear when it inevitably stops working. I wish I could have a limited opinion thereof, but you're right, not practical. And mine is certainly both detailed, and cranky.

      --
      !Equality through palindromes semordnilap hguorht ytilauqE!
    42. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's enough smoking of the earthly remains of Steve Jobs for you. Objective-C is the least elegant language I've ever seen, and that includes assembly language for two different chip architectures.

      1. And this differs from C++ how?

      2. I really despise Steve Jobs worship, but this was one of the few things he was more or less right on.

      3. That welding together of two different languages isn't necessarily a bad thing. Certainly, it is much, much more desirable than Java's "You WILL USE OBJECTS IN EVERYTHING YOU DO WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!!" approach (more on this in a moment.)

      In the hands of someone capable (I've already admitted Java is much more idiotproof), it can make optimization much easier as you can easily when C stuff is happening and when Objective-C stuff is happening even if those things are heavily mixed.

      4. I'm more concerned with elegance from a properties-of-constructs point of view, not elegance of syntax. Syntax can be (but for some reason generally isn't) abstracted and changed. I have no patience whatsoever for the "But Python uses whitespace for scope delimiting! I want *brackets*, waaaaaah!" arguments. No, I don't especially love objective-c syntax but that shouldn't be the main issue.

      5. Ok, you want to insist that syntax matters anyway? Fine, message passing at least is a coherent paradigm. Mixing () function syntax with .method syntax the way C++ and Java do is a fucking abomination. Not only is it often a symptom of a crippled OO system (a lack of multiple dispatch), but it's a very ugly relict of C++'s insane decision to foist noun-centric syntax on everyone whether they like it or not. The sane thing to do would be have the dot be exactly equivalent to a function call with parentheses except the object (or primitive) to the left of the dot is passed in as the first argument. "Well that makes no sense!", I can hear you say. "The dot is obviously meant to convey whether or not the object *has* the method defined for that class, mirroring its dual syntax usage to address specific fields within the object"... and this is a symptom of the massive brain rot that C++ syntax has spread everywhere.

      Objects/classes don't own methods. That's extremely stupid and limiting and badly corrupts the function-centered way of doing things. (Now, an object can have a first-class function present within it but that's something quite different from a class defining a function.)

      This is a treatise best left for another day, I think. Bottom line is that no, I'm not completely in love with objective-c syntax but its semantics are reasonably beautiful and the damage C++/Java's syntax has wrought is (in the eyes of anyone whose brain hasn't been thorough corrupted with "design pattern" dreck) nothing short of catastrophic.

    43. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for capacitive screens, they do shatter (or at least crack in the corners). ...I still hate capacitive screens, particularly for soft-keyboards.

      Capacitive doesn't have to be glass. I've seen two low-end devices that appeared to have plastic capacitive screens (they were multitouch and certainly didn't feel like resistive.)

      The friction sucks, but if you don't do a lot of swiping (just pecking or viewing), it's fantastic. It's lighter and incredibly durable. Although, you do need to toss a screen protector on it to protect against scratches.

      The glass thing is so weird... I'm positive they could figure out a formula of plastic (perhaps with a coating of something special sprayed on) that had decent frictional properties. I think it must be a legit conspiracy. That's the only explanation. They know that there are WAY too many used phones available due to carrier subsidization, so they had to find a way to plausibly make them more fragile.

      I agree that resistive is a bit underrated (I had the chance to use an N800 for a period of time), especially for precision, but *some* multitouch gestures, like zooming, is just way, way too damn convenient to give up. I've also had a couple resistive screens die on me (progressive discoloration) whereas the aforementioned plastic-capacitive phone eventually had to be sold on Craigslist for $10, all scratched to hell and back, but with a completely functional and uncracked display.

      Apple also used to make clicky alps-based keyboards.

      Alps doesn't really do it for me, be it Matias or vintage. I always thought the point of mechanical keyboards is to not be bottoming out most of your strokes, allowing you to go faster (once you get used to it) and have less finger fatigue. The higher actuation point is nice, but useless without a good followup. Besides, Cherry has finally made a higher actuation switch (Speed Silver MX) and hopefully the Chinese MX-clone companies won't be far behind (maybe even with tactility/clicks?).

      I get to deal with all their gear when it inevitably stops working.

      Oh, well maybe this is trickier in some cases, but I nipped that in the bud by saying "I will customize and fix any Windows, Linux or Android device you have. If you buy Apple, you're on your own. I'm not learning OS X or iOS." This worked for me pretty effectively, but if one's family has been caught early on in the Apple RDF then I can fully understand and empathize about the difficulties of saying no.

      Although, truth be told, I still ended up learning tidbits I wish I didn't know due to friends and coworkers. So infectious.

    44. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation? and not some ridiculous skewed apple research, real research please.

    45. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Citation? and not some ridiculous skewed apple research, real research please.

      That wasn't "ridiculously skewed Apple research". In fact, some very high-up on the original Mac team, most notably Jef Raskin, actually wanted a VERY multi-button mouse (I think 5 was what he wanted); so that pretty much negates any "corporate bias".

      I don't have time to comb through a bunch of research; but the answer is in here. Search for "button" on that page.

    46. Re:Simplicity can only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modifier key on the keyboard then click; there is your drop menu.system seven was doing this and it may have been implemented even earlier in the Apple System Software.

  4. Dear /. editors by guruevi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please try to link to a site that does not obtrusively ask for money when you want to see the story. I'm sure there are other sites that have the same coverage without ruining my experience.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Dear /. editors by dex22 · · Score: 1

      Like linking to a site that, in their story, links to their source. Wouldn't the source by definition be a better site to link? :D

    2. Re:Dear /. editors by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      It annoys me to no end when there's a link to page, that cites another page talking about the same thing, and you have to go to that page to get the actual source.

      WHAT THE FUCK! JUST POST THE DIRECT SOURCE!

      Nobody cares for some random website's opinion on the topic, give us what we want!

      But nooo... we have to deal with shitty web UI's and obtrusive advertisements three times over( if not using adblock).

      As the late, great Hunter S. Thomson put it, lets cut down to the brass tacks, shall we?

      /Endrant

    3. Re:Dear /. editors by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      Not if you can't access it. Even a secondhand story is better than a link to a first hand account you can't read. Ideally you'd give both, "An article on blah has an account of the fascinating tale originally reported in the crappy paywalled site blahblah."

    4. Re:Dear /. editors by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Slashdot links to other sites??? I must have missed something!

    5. Re:Dear /. editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: Please Do NOT RTFA. That tends to make you more informed, and thus you deviate from the normal /. commenter.

  5. Editor's note? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has editors?

  6. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there goes all the vi users.

    1. Re:Well... by npslider · · Score: 2

      All 2 of them?

      *ducks

    2. Re: Well... by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      More than that. Anyone who uses their laptop to SSH to a *nix server will need ESC for vi. Yeah, it could be added to the ribbon, but muscle memory means many people will keep hitting `

      Mac allows keep remapping, yeah?

    3. Re: Well... by npslider · · Score: 1

      True, vi does still have it's place! :wq

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think ducks can use vi. Webbed feet aren't effectively for pressing Escape.

    5. Re: Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vim extensions is the only thing that keeps Xcode usable. As usable as a steaming pile of shit can be.

        I wouldn't care if it weren't for the fact that iOS development requires mac hardware and Apple software.

      Look, if you want to make a shitty product go ahead, but lose phone market share first.

    6. Re: Well... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Or, they might start to use nano instead....

      Crazy people.

    7. Re: Well... by nickittynickname · · Score: 1

      The issue is the physical escape key. The key's form and feel are important for muscle memory. You shouldn't need to look down to press any key on the keyboard but this strip is going to encourage just that. System admins tend to stay on the keyboard more using shortcuts so things like a physical escape key are important.

    8. Re: Well... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The issue is the physical escape key. The key's form and feel are important for muscle memory. You shouldn't need to look down to press any key on the keyboard but this strip is going to encourage just that. System admins tend to stay on the keyboard more using shortcuts so things like a physical escape key are important.

      Muscle memory is more about everything OTHER than feeling a physical key top. It's much more about arm reach, wrist rotation and finger-spread. Sure, a concave key top kind of helps your fingertip kind of " settle-into" the key-center; but as far as getting your hand and fingers OVER that key top has NOTHING to do with said key top (unless you look).

      Think about another kind of "keyboarding" skill: Musical keyboards. I don't know if you know how to play any keyboarded instruments, but I do. And I can tell you that if what I am saying wasn't true, it would be significantly harder, if not impossible, to attain any reasonable proficiency at playing same, especially when having your vision otherwise occupied reading musical notation.

      Does it help that the key depresses when you strike it? Undoubtedly; but if that was all there was to "muscle memory", how would that help your arms, hands, and fingers get to the right keys to strike them in the first place? This is especially true of something like an 88-key piano. The angles of your arms, rotation of your hands, and "presentation" of your fingers varies drastically from one end of the keyboard to the other, and yet a good pianist can strike any key blindfolded. And remember, when playing live music, ther ISN'T a handy Backspace key or Undo!!! But I submit that level if positional accuracy would likely still be true even if the keys were painted on a piece of glass; so long as the "key top" images were the standard size and shape, and the overall dimensions were also per AGO standards.

      And so it will be with a touch-screen ESC key: So long as it stays in one place, your brain will soon map the "servo positions" necessary to hut the target, with or without a key. Otherwise, you wouldn't see legions of vaccuous teenagers being able to text on touchscreen keyboards at their typical 50 WPM.

  7. Coming Soon! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Future Macs will have no user interface at all. You will get a flat gray cube with an Apple logo on it that will have no interactive capability. However, you will be firmly nestled in the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion field, fully aware that, no matter how utterly worthless the overpriced cube may be, your status as a hipster is secure.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Coming Soon! by npslider · · Score: 2

      I think the Apple Watch is an early Beta of this future product.

    2. Re:Coming Soon! by sjames · · Score: 2

      As soon as they make sure it doesn't accidentally emit enough heat to warm your hands and that the Apple logo emits enough light to clearly see it at all times without accidentally providing useful vision in low light situations, it'll be ready for production.

      There is considerable concern in the engineering department that it is still heavy enough to hold paper down.

    3. Re:Coming Soon! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Dilbert: http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-...

    4. Re:Coming Soon! by npslider · · Score: 1

      Apple has a simple fix for that last one: eliminate legacy support for paper.

    5. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have it with a mirror finish so you can concentrate on the most important thing in the world!

  8. It takes courage to not Esc... by npslider · · Score: 4, Funny

    It takes courage to not Escape.

    1. Re:It takes courage to not Esc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, take the escape key, not the caps key, they'll needed it to shout about us taking the escape key.

    2. Re:It takes courage to not Esc... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I prefer keys that weren't captured in the first place.

    3. Re:It takes courage to not Esc... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      With all of the frequently used features Apple has been removing from its products lately, they are clearly demonstrating courage above and beyond the call of duty.

      Somebody needs to nominate them for a Congressional Medal of Honor.

    4. Re:It takes courage to not Esc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we hope and pray that now many more shall indeed Escape the clutches of the Evil Fruit Co. What's up with US companies the last while? Windows 10, Apple no-port, no-plug, no-button ..? Is someone trying to kill off the industry?
      Me I opted a good long while ago to Linux, and have never looked back.

  9. At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to Apple, we will at last purge the filthy vi heathens. Let the thousand-year reign of emacs begin!

    1. Re:At long last by npslider · · Score: 1

      Long live notepad.exe!

      May clippy's reign be unending!

      Oh, wait... wrong reality distortion field.

    2. Re:At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the Escape key, and I said nothing because I used Emacs.
      Then they came for the Ctrl key...

    3. Re:At long last by npslider · · Score: 1

      That left you with only one ALTernative...

    4. Re:At long last by slashdice · · Score: 1

      Actually... the Apple wireless keyboard has a "Fn" key where ctrl should be. (Ctrl is next to it, but is no longer the first key in the row.) It's in a box somewhere because of that.

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    5. Re: At long last by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      It's one of the first things I look at when I buy a new laptop. If ctrl is in the wrong place, it's enough reason to not buy one...

    6. Re:At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people who use 'Esc' to dismiss dialog boxes? This is unbelievable! What will they do next? Remove the 'Enter' key?

    7. Re: At long last by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      FYI, Thinkpads have a Fn key left of CTRL, but you can swap them in the BIOS.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    8. Re:At long last by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Remove the \ ... only Windows users use that key. The | will just be a necessary casualty in order for progress to be made.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    9. Re:At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only people that have no idea what they're doing use Escape in Vi.

      Why would you move your hand away from the home row?

    10. Re:At long last by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It drives me crazy that there's an option key on the right side of the keyboard, but no control key. I very rarely use the option key tbh. Basically only when I use emacs. And even in emacs, somewhat less than the control key.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:At long last by sconeu · · Score: 1

      How the hell will you literal your shell metacharacters, then?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:At long last by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      That's for when you use Boot Camp.

    13. Re: At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo offers the user to switch place between Ctrl and Fn in the firmware configuration. It's not optimal, but I consider it to be an acceptable trade-off compared with choosing a laptop that has other (and possibly worse) downsides.

  10. Ah, minimialism by ErichTheRed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lenovo did this with their X1 Carbon a while back too. What is the obsession with removing functionality? Sure, Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys. However, Esc has always been the equivalent of Cancel on MacOS and Windows dialog boxes, and terminal-based applications still use it.

    I don't know - I guess I feel old. Yes, hipster apps don't use control keys on luddite keyboards. Apps! But, removing a functional item for purely aesthetic purposes -- which I guarantee is the reason Apple is doing this -- seems to me like a bad precedent to set. People who use their computers for actual work like the idea of a full keyboard, and removing keys from an already-sparse MacBook Pro keyboard doesn't seem like a good way to attract this class of user. You already have to use a combination to get home, end, pgup and pgdn on Mac keyboards, for example.

    1. Re:Ah, minimialism by npslider · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps Apple has ran out of useful features to add to their new products and have been forced to resort to this.

      Just look at how much more gorgeous the new iPhone 7 looks without that ugly cowardly headphone jack!

    2. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the obsession with removing functionality?

      Production costs.
      Look at the hardware, software, devices of all kinds around you. Everything is cheaper and lower quality now that its relative counterpart 10 years ago. Why would computers be any different?

      The Recession never ended Picard.

    3. Re:Ah, minimialism by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >Lenovo did this with their X1 Carbon a while back too. What is the obsession with removing functionality? Sure, Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys. However, Esc has always been the equivalent of Cancel on MacOS and Windows dialog boxes, and terminal-based applications still use it.

      I'm typing this on my Lenovo X1 Carbon, complete with its escape key on the keyboard. What are you talking about?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Ah, minimialism by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      don't like it well you can buy a $30 usb-c keyboard or an $29.99 apple usb-c to usb-a dongle + power port? to much for only $19.99 usb-c to usb-a dongle

    5. Re:Ah, minimialism by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Lenovo did this with their X1 Carbon a while back too.

      Actually, they didn't remove the ESC key, but they relocated it, and did several other gibberingly insane things as well. It was a fscking disaster. Gen-3 restored the keyboard to sanity, and is quite a decent machine.

    6. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm? I use a mac (Macbook pro at work, and an iMac at home) and I use escape all of the time! I really hope this isn't true; I actually like my Macbook Pro the way it is. Size is fine, and it works great. I seriously hate this keep removing things trend; of course Windows 10 isn't an option I want either, so...ugh :(

    7. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They brought it back on the next generation of X1 Carbon. This was around the same time they got rid of the physical TrackPoint buttons on their T series machines, then brought those back after one generation as well. The previous X1 Carbons had an LED changeable strip similar to what Apple is doing.

      Say what you will about Lenovo but they do seem to listen to ThinkPad buyers (at least of the expensive ones.) When your target market is a crowd that cranks out spreadsheets and writes software, aesthetically driven change doesn't go over so well.

    8. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's so courageous! And change is always good when it comes from Jobs... I mean, the new guy, whatsisname. And I will continue to say that at least until whatsisname comes out and denies this rumour, at which point I'll say that only a fool would remove the esc key.

    9. Re:Ah, minimialism by npslider · · Score: 1

      So how much money does the average Esc key cost these days?

      Is it more than a large space bar? Oh but the space bar has no print, that's gotta be cheaper.

      I bet the next to go is the space bar!! Siri will auto correct!

      ThisIsTheNewWayToSaveAppleMoney!

    10. Re:Ah, minimialism by npslider · · Score: 1

      Say that 10 times fast.... :)

    11. Re:Ah, minimialism by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Alright. This this X1 is bristling with extra buttons, finger sensors, track pads, track pad buttons and other pointing devices. They went too far though I don't need that stuff, but I do use esc. My existing mac book is fine without extra buttons for volume or power but it has esc in the right place.

      Perfection would be the happy hacking layout with control where caps lock usually is. That's why I use a happy hacking keyboard at my desk.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Ah, minimialism by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Apple wants to be minimalist so I have to make my life more complicated with peripherals and dongles? What kind of backward thinking is that?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an odd assertion to make that Mac users don't end up using the function key row all that often... on my 2008 Macbook I have screen brightness up / down, mute, volume up / down, expose^W mission-control keys soft mapped onto that row from the factory. Even if I didn't need a physical escape key for use in vIm / other console applications I still find myself using that row of keys.

    14. Re:Ah, minimialism by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Get rid of the "Q" key. No one uses that. We shouldn't let a minority of words dictate the keyboard for everyone. We can do this without affecting kwality.

    15. Re:Ah, minimialism by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And yet they KEPT the moronic Windows key...

    16. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys.

      THIS Mac user uses the Esc key all the time to dismiss OS X/macOS Dialogs.

      Oh, and XCode uses F-Keys, and I believe Logic Pro and Final Cut Pro do as well, but I might be wrong about the latter two.

      The thing is, Macs have the "Command" key; so a lot of things that would be bound to Function-Keys on other platforms are handled with the Command key, or with a Chord that includes the Command key in various combinations with Option (Alt), Shift, and Ctrl.

    17. Re:Ah, minimialism by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Lenovo did this with their X1 Carbon a while back too. What is the obsession with removing functionality? Sure, Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys. However, Esc has always been the equivalent of Cancel on MacOS and Windows dialog boxes, and terminal-based applications still use it.

      No, they didn't, actually. The Esc key was still a real key, it was must moved left of the 1, where the tilde/backtick key is. That was moved to some place beside Ctrl I believe. Kinda like how UK layouts have a huge Enter key and mover the pipe/backslash beside the right Ctrl key.

    18. Re:Ah, minimialism by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Just think how many barometric sensors you could put in the freed space! The possibilities are endless. Perhaps they could use it for a different key altogether! Like.... I don't know.... an F0 key or separate out the ` and ~ into their own keys! Progress!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    19. Re:Ah, minimialism by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      A USB-C dongle with a single Esc key on it....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    20. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly is wrong with the Windows key, other than the name. An extra modifier key is useful for shortcuts.

    21. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 2

      The previous X1 Carbons had an LED changeable strip similar to what Apple is doing.

      Oh, please! The Lenovo strip was NOTHING like what Apple is doing.

      Lenovo's non-improvement was just a slight modification of those retarded "status" strips on POS plastic Windows laptops, that simply used a Lexan strip with a Deadfront Grey mask covering screened-on "annunciators" for WiFi, HD access, etc. lit-up by fixed LEDs that would shine through the Deadfront Grey, with some sort of membrane switch layer. There was absolutely NO "Programmability" to it, since IT WASN'T A "real" (graphical, bitmapped) DISPLAY. No WONDER they removed that embarassment pronto!

      Here, we have that "piece of a good idea" Lenovo had, but fully-realized and actually made FUNCTIONAL by Apple.

      Many people have wanted "programmable keytops" for quite some time now (there has even a product or two). Well, this is Apple's "toe in the water" for that concept.

      Next go-around, if the rumors are true, Apple will have E-Ink "keytops" on ALL the keys. THEN what will you bitch about? I'm sure it will be SOMETHING...

      Oh, and anyone who has ANY thought that Apple is Keyboard-Hostile, needs only to look at two things:

      1. The Keyboard Shortcuts list for OS X/macOS. Oh, and don't forget the other two lists linked off of that list!

      2. The fact that OS X/macOS has, since the beginning, had a Keyboard Shortcuts EDITOR, which allows you to trigger ANY Menu-Command with a User-Defined Keybinding. You can define both System-Wide and Application-Specific Keyboard Shortcuts. And in more recent versions of OS X/macOS, the functionality of that Editor has been DRAMATICALLY increased; such that there is fairly-well unprecedented ability to define/redefine keybindings/key layouts.

      Actually pretty damned nice, and something I have heard was just now added to Windows (in one form or another) in the most-recent version or two.

    22. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple wants to be minimalist so I have to make my life more complicated with peripherals and dongles? What kind of backward thinking is that?

      No. You've got it all wrong.

      Apple is trying to make what amounts to a whole keyboard row's worth of seldom-used F-keys (compared with most of the other keys), and turn that into a PROGRAMMABLE, CONTEXTUAL set of MULTI-VARIANT Controls, that, in the end, will be FAR more useful, in FAR more applications (small "a"), than fixed-function, fixed format, F-Keys.

      Watch the Keynote on Thursday. Then maybe you'll get it.

    23. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Hmm? I use a mac (Macbook pro at work, and an iMac at home) and I use escape all of the time! I really hope this isn't true; I actually like my Macbook Pro the way it is. Size is fine, and it works great. I seriously hate this keep removing things trend; of course Windows 10 isn't an option I want either, so...ugh :(

      RELAX! The Esc Key isn't going ANYWHERE. It will OBVIOUSLY be included in the Default "F-Keys" Magic Toolbar set. In fact, I would imagine that the Keyboard Shortcuts Editor in macOS will simply be expanded to include definitions for the Magic Toolbar. You will probably be able to have the "Esc" key mapped onto EVERY Magic Toolbar set with a simple checkbox. In fact, one presentation seems to show a two-line layout, so that you can have, among other things, the F-Keys (and likely ESC) ALWAYS visible

      And I am sure the Magic Toolbar will be a proper, glass-front, capacitive-touch (probably multitouch) control/display strip, so that "wearout" won't be a problem.

    24. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA

      Just one key.
      Only 50 clicks away!

    25. Re:Ah, minimialism by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Esc has always been the equivalent of Cancel on MacOS [...]

      I'm not so sure about that. Command-Period was the equivalent of cancel on MacOS. Heck, Macintosh and Macintosh Plus didn't have escape keys. It wasn't until the ADB keyboards came along that Macs had a keyboard with an escape key.

    26. Re:Ah, minimialism by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well, you're talking to someone who has never really liked media keys on keyboards because if it's not standard I can't get used to it. I know F1 usually means help and F5 usually means refresh. I'm good with that, I don't actually need the key to say it. I'm smart, I can do those things.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    27. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well, you're talking to someone who has never really liked media keys on keyboards because if it's not standard I can't get used to it. I know F1 usually means help and F5 usually means refresh. I'm good with that, I don't actually need the key to say it. I'm smart, I can do those things.

      I don't use media keys either; but it isn't a matter of IQ. Some people just Enjoy being able to pause their music, skip a song, change the volume, etc without having to mess with the GUI. And there are some times when even I can see the advantages, such as when using your laptop to do a Presentation.

    28. Re:Ah, minimialism by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The fact is, standards exist because when everything is the same people can use it more efficiently. Apple seems to be hell bent on being non-standard. Whether it is as cool as they think it is or not, having an ever shifting non-standard positioning of keys is going to force anyone working with the machine to stop and look down at the keyboard to use that key. There is no way that it can result in being more efficient for anyone.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    29. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn,, we should all worship apple

    30. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work for Apple or what? I've never seen one apologist all over a single thread, Apple-splaining the rationale for a product change in dozens of comments, before.

    31. Re:Ah, minimialism by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Say that 10 times fast.... :)

      or say it once backward and... summon the ghost of Steve!!!! (woooOOOOOOOOoooooo)

    32. Re:Ah, minimialism by adolf · · Score: 2

      Better to get rid of the W key, since uue can accomplish the same thing by using tuuo single Us.

    33. Re:Ah, minimialism by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys.

      THIS Mac user uses the Esc key all the time to dismiss OS X/macOS Dialogs.

      Which may be why there's something labeled "Cancel" at the left edge of the touch bar in one of the images from TFA.

      (And THIS Mac user uses the Esc key all the time to start commands in microEmacs in Terminal, but I digress....)

    34. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 2016. Not only we won't get rid of the "Q" key, but because we must fight oppression and discrimination, we will replace oppressive letters like "E" or "S" with more "Q". And aq I'm a not a faqciqt, lqt mq qtart right now!

    35. Re:Ah, minimialism by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Take a page out of Microsoft's book. MS added a microsoft key, Apple should add an apple key.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    36. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Damn,, we should all worship apple

      I'll just settle for credit for a good idea.

    37. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The fact is, standards exist because when everything is the same people can use it more efficiently. Apple seems to be hell bent on being non-standard. Whether it is as cool as they think it is or not, having an ever shifting non-standard positioning of keys is going to force anyone working with the machine to stop and look down at the keyboard to use that key. There is no way that it can result in being more efficient for anyone.

      No.

      A "Standard" is some process or protocol that has been formally proposed, peer-reviewed, submitted for comment, voted-on, and finally ratified. It is NOT some laptop manufacturer saying "Hey! I've got an idea for how to use those worthless Function Keys!", and then everyone else SORT-OF copying the idea, but with their own variations. I am nearly positive that there isn't an actual, defined, official, ASCII code for "Launch Browser", or "Volume Up", REGARDLESS of how many OEMs have "adopted" each other's key selections.

    38. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Do you work for Apple or what? I've never seen one apologist all over a single thread, Apple-splaining the rationale for a product change in dozens of comments, before.

      Nope. Just bored at work, like most people on here...

    39. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Mac users probably don't use the Escape key too much, let alone the function keys.

      THIS Mac user uses the Esc key all the time to dismiss OS X/macOS Dialogs.

      Which may be why there's something labeled "Cancel" at the left edge of the touch bar in one of the images from TFA.

      (And THIS Mac user uses the Esc key all the time to start commands in microEmacs in Terminal, but I digress....)

      Good catch! I didn't see that; but I'll bet that generates an "ESC" key code.

    40. Re:Ah, minimialism by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apple has a history of removing essential buttons from its hardware. Remember when they started using slot loading CD drives with no eject button? Must have been around 15 years ago now. Of course, it immediately caused problems, the computer would crash and refuse to eject discs. I recall that certain copy protected music discs would get jammed in too.

      Not having a physical power button, combined with a non-removable battery, seems like a great way to get a crashed machine stuck on until the battery runs flat. Hopefully you didn't need to do any work for the next 8 hours, and the power management is still working to protect the battery from over-discharge.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From an ascetic (and visually aesthetic) viewpoint, 'v's work better.

      '"since vve can accomplish the same thing by using tvvo single V's."

      At some point, Apple will have to change it's logo to reflect it's pivot to asceticism.

      "Meditative minimalism: less is more, it's the Apple way."

    42. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, jolly good show, sport!

    43. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe if it was an original idea.

    44. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory: http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-04-10

    45. Re:Ah, minimialism by macs4all · · Score: 1

      maybe if it was an original idea.

      Well, it looks to be a significant improvement on what everyone else has tried; so I think that "counts".

    46. Re:Ah, minimialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

    47. Re:Ah, minimialism by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Apple should add an apple key.

      Closed or open?

    48. Re:Ah, minimialism by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how more functional the Apple strip is compared to Lenovo, it shares the same fundamental problem of no/crappy haptic feedback when actually using it as an extra row of keys (for things like Esc and F1-12). Which makes working on that part of it much more difficult than on a normal keyboard. I speak from experience, as I've been using that very Thinkpad model for over a year now.

  11. HILLARY CLINTON KILLED THE ESCAPE KEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the power key and she's coming for the capslock key next!!!!1!!1!

    1. Re:HILLARY CLINTON KILLED THE ESCAPE KEY by npslider · · Score: 1

      nOOOOO mAKE iT sTOP1111

    2. Re:HILLARY CLINTON KILLED THE ESCAPE KEY by stevez67 · · Score: 1

      (sarcasm warning) You forgot to shout BENGHAZI, but nice try lol

    3. Re:HILLARY CLINTON KILLED THE ESCAPE KEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mohammed: Did you see Mohammed at the meeting today?
      Mohammed: No, but his brother Mohammed showed up.
      Mohammed: What did Mohammed talk about?
      Mohammed: Mohammed introduced us to Mohammed who is also a mason!
      Mohammed: A mason? No shit? How long has he been one?
      Mohammed: About five years. He was referred to the local lodge by Mohammed.
      Mohammed: Ah, yes, Mohammed. He has a shit ton of connections around town!
      Mohammed: Yes, and our brothers, police be upon them, Mohammed and Mohammed from Egypt came, too.
      Mohammed: I've been thinking of becoming a clown.
      Mohammed: A clown, Mohammed, why?
      Mohammed: So I can film myself being gay.
      Mohammed: Oh, you.
      Mohammed: So anyway, is Mohammed, Mohammed, and Mohammed coming to the next party?
      Mohammed: Indeed. Mohammed was so funny last time.
      Mohammed: Well it wouldn't be a party without Mohammed.
      Mohammed: Yes, my friend. POLICE BE UPON THEM!

    4. Re:HILLARY CLINTON KILLED THE ESCAPE KEY by npslider · · Score: 1

      police be upon them

      Two funny!

  12. Re:poor vim users by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Not unless Apple add Meta and Cokebottle keys to the keyboard..
    (yes, I know 99.5% of this group are too young to understand that, once it would not have been true).

  13. Oh noes! by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please tell me they atleast still have the PrtScn/SysRq and Pause/Break buttons!

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Oh noes! by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say that Esc is about as useful? Because, you know, you're quite wrong. Open a file with vi and see.

    2. Re: Oh noes! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      For the average PC user, opening vi is an introduction to Hell.

      Nothing they have been trained to do works. At all.

    3. Re: Oh noes! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Forget about "average PC user". Some of us long time Unix users view vi as a perverse sort of hell. Fortunately, Unix is more modular and less prone to being dominated by crappy monopolies.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Oh noes! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Please tell me they atleast still have the PrtScn/SysRq and Pause/Break buttons!

      And don't forget the "Here Is" key.

      WTF was THAT about? Was that a "teletype" thing?

    5. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since that bar is contextual, I'm hoping that any time you're in Terminal it'll give you the full list of Esc and Function keys.

      What I might find more annoying is that if they're doing that it might be harder (ie less instinctive) to adjust screen brightness and music volume while in the Terminal.

    6. Re: Oh noes! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      For the average PC user, opening vi is an introduction to Hell.

      Nothing they have been trained to do works. At all.

      Oh, you mean like the ridiculous, throwback commands for Cut/Copy/Paste in Windows Powershell?

      Here you are, in a Windows environment, and need to do a little Powershell stuff. Ok, so I need to Paste this "Copy as Text" Path I just Ctrl-C'ed from Windows Explorer. Ok, switch to Powershell. Ctrl-V... WTF?!? OH, Right-Click-Paste. Ok... Alright, now I ran my Cmdlet, and want to Copy and Paste the Results back to a Windows document (already open). Yes, I'm sure I could "pipe" the output into some text file, but I just want to copy/paste. Drag-Select using the Mouse... Oh, Wait! Now I have to Right-Click-MARK, THEN I can Drag-Select ("Marquee" select) a block of text. Ctrl-C. Switch to Windows document. Ctrl-V. WTF!?!? OH, it's like we've been transported to FOURTY-YEAR-OLD DOS!!! "RETURN" (Enter) does the COPY!!! Yay!!!

      Talk about fucking with your muscle-memory!!! It's one of the (many) things with Windows that makes me ask myself "Do Windows Developers even USE this stuff, or are they just SADISTIC and User-Surly on purpose?"

    7. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Vi since 1996. I've never used the escape key.

      Ctrl+[ is much more convenient.

    8. Re:Oh noes! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Open a file with vi and see.

      This depends if you still have another working terminal or can spawn one. If you do, no problems, "killall vi" or an equivalent will help. If not, you're probably fucked as no way to spawn terminals implies you're in a rescue shell/over a serial line/etc. The amount of line noise required to exit vi is long enough that the chances of finding it on your own are rather unlikely.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    9. Re:Oh noes! by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Please tell me they atleast still have the PrtScn/SysRq and Pause/Break buttons!

      And NumLock! The loss of that worthless key, along with Scroll Lock and Pause Break will. . . Wait, what the hell were those keys ever used for? I was on DOS for a decade and never needed them.

    10. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I miss scrl lock the most.
      A lot of kvm switches uses it for switching =P

    11. Re: Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not every mac user is pants on head retarded. There are plenty of dev shops that use them for a stable unix box and for web developers love the shit out of them. That market has a vim user base.

    12. Re:Oh noes! by hawk · · Score: 1

      They drifted in on IBM keyboards, because, well, IBM terminals had those keys/

      Yes, the same folks who sent the control key into exile (CKIE), instead of next to the A, where God Meant it to be . . . Over the years, the cap lock key has been far more trouble than numlock
      hail

    13. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to say that Esc is about as useful? Because, you know, you're quite wrong. Open a file with vi and see.

      I agree esc is used a lot, but vi is a poor example considering almost nobody uses it (yes, you're nobody).

  14. LOL by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors

    ... but we will if we can't get enough wild speculation and laughable hyperbole to fill the front page.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. No Function Keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am I going to press F5 while trying to buy Google IO tickets?

    1. Re:No Function Keys? by npslider · · Score: 1

      That requires the use of an old thing they once called the 'keyboard.' The new way is to use 7 fingers and swipe across at a 76 degree angle for 11 cm to initiate the refresh gesture on your full-sized itouch pad.

    2. Re:No Function Keys? by Falos · · Score: 1

      You also have to hold it there. Because no user experience is complete without a half-second delay on every possible bit of I/O.

    3. Re:No Function Keys? by npslider · · Score: 1

      Oh right. Thank You. If you don't hold it there for 0.5 seconds, that gesture opens Claris Works.

      Best not to get those two confused!

    4. Re:No Function Keys? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      How am I going to press F5 while trying to buy Google IO tickets?

      Simple. Just switch to the Magic Toolbar "set" that has the F-keys (and likely the ESC Key) and press away!

      Sheesh! You people absolutely bend-over-backwards to concoct ridiculous scenarios. Of COURSE the Magic Toolbar (hey, I didn't name it!) will have ESC and F-Keys as one or more of the Default "Sets".

  16. Reminds me of DEC keyboards. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    The lack of an escape key reminds me of my years using DEC keyboards which, famously, didn't have Escape keys. You had to type Ctrl-[ to generate an Esc. Vi and emacs were a pain to use, but I really liked DEC TPU.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re: Reminds me of DEC keyboards. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The original Mac and Mac Plus keyboard didn't even have a control key. It's a little challenging to even find images of it (all the ebay sellers seem to have extended ADB keyboards) but I found an image with google good enough to zoom in on.

    2. Re:Reminds me of DEC keyboards. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I did that for a very long time. Even with Emacs. One day another Emacs user was watching me typing and said:
      "Wait, how did you do that?"
      "What do you mean?"
      "That command, what was your keyboard shortcut for it."
      "Oh, Escape-twiddle."
      "No, you had a control command."
      "Yes, Escape-twiddle."
      "But what's the control for?"
      "It's the escape!"
      "OMG, you VMS people really have it bad, don't you?"

    3. Re:Reminds me of DEC keyboards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was it a pain to use a key combination that doesn't require you to move your hands, vs a key that does?

  17. Re:poor vim users by presidenteloco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No. We just won't be using macbooks for development any more. Shame really. I'm waiting for someone to make the ultimate linux-based software development laptop now. And it would be nice if it had some of the design cohesion and just-works features of apple products.

    Before someone rants, of course developers use many other editor tools, but proper support of the terminal and vi is essential for a serious server-software (back end software, or IT admin) development box.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  18. Caps Lock by sycodon · · Score: 1

    That key needs to die an ugly death.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Caps Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Times 1000.

    2. Re:Caps Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you want to... nevermind.

    3. Re:Caps Lock by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I disagree. A beautiful death would be acceptable also.

    4. Re:Caps Lock by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      What if you want to...

      ...toggle between keyboard layouts?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Caps Lock by Megol · · Score: 1

      Why not remap it to something useful? That's what I like to do...

    6. Re:Caps Lock by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      YES. I CONCUR.

    7. Re:Caps Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a Fn key where control used to be after control moved into the place of Caps Lock? Or like escape in vi? Although, it would be nice to use a locking key with a light, in the appropriate position (corner), to change keyboard layouts, so I can see your point, but it would be annoying to leave its position unchanged. But I suppose if the layout is suited to lots of changes, having it next to the home row would be convenient. How do you use it?

    8. Re:Caps Lock by flargleblarg · · Score: 2

      I remap mine to Control. As God intended.

    9. Re:Caps Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if I can replace it with shift lock. Oh and you have to press shift to unlock the shift lock.

    10. Re:Caps Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aLL OF THE ACCOUNTANTS WHERE I WORK HAVE CAP LOCKS ON all THE TIME. cAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY ACCOUNTANTS DO THIS?

      captcha: INSULAR

    11. Re:Caps Lock by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      That key needs to die an ugly death.

      I use it quite often for coding. sql keywords and constants. I would go nuts having to hold shift half the day.

    12. Re:Caps Lock by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You must be using a really weird keyboard.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  19. In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Hartree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You never turn off your devices. You will be constantly be consuming monetized content.

    Including the surf noise it plays while you're sleeping.

    Someone who wants to turn it off must, obviously, be deviant and need intervention.

    1. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by npslider · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can always just remove the batter...

      Oh poo.

    2. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Falos · · Score: 1

      You will be recommended to the Ministry of Reeducation. It is for your benefit. You will comply. You will be made better.

    3. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including the surf noise it plays while you're sleeping.

      search YouTube for 10 hours of surf noise for sleeping

    4. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Do you get paid every time you use the word "be"?

    5. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You never turn off your devices. You will be constantly be consuming monetized content.

      Including the surf noise it plays while you're sleeping.

      Someone who wants to turn it off must, obviously, be deviant and need intervention.

      Some time in the future, watching old episodes of "The IT Crowd" with my kid.

      "Have you tried turning it off and on again? You do know how to work a button?"

      and my kid asks
      "What does he mean 'turn it off and on again?'"
      "Well in the old days people used to be allowed to turn their computers off."
      "What do you mean? Why would you do that?"
      "Because sometimes computers would go wrong and it might fix them."
      "Sssshhh daddy, we don't want anyone to hear you say anything bad about computers."

      shades of 'Paranoia!'

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      You never turn off your devices. You will be constantly be consuming monetized content.

      Including the surf noise it plays while you're sleeping.

      I'd rather play surf noise when I'm not sleeping.

    7. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So basically like most people's phones then.

      For me the issue is that it wastes energy and that sometimes things go wrong and I need to hold down the power button to force the device off. It's especially handy when the police demand you hand your devices over and you want to ensure they are fully encrypted and not vulnerable to Thunderbolt/DMA attacks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP THINKING DIFFERENT.

    9. Re:In our vision of the "new" connected world: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always just remove the batter...

      Oh poo.

      I read this a few times thinking that this was a pancake joke.

  20. Ugh by TFlan91 · · Score: 2

    I once had a laptop with a "touchscreen" for volumn, power, etc and within a year that shit the bed. Never went back to anything that remotely looked like a touchscreen keyboard.

    1. Re:Ugh by asalazar · · Score: 1

      Hi. We come from the Computer Museum of Relics. Would you be interested in donating your Blackberry to our collection?

      --
      Slashdot: Where the sig outsmarts the comment
    2. Re:Ugh by npslider · · Score: 1

      ...And in our next exhibit, a headphone jack resting on the Esc key.

      It took humanity great courage to make this evolutionary leap, but it was worth it!

    3. Re:Ugh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I once had a laptop with a "touchscreen" for volumn, power, etc and within a year that shit the bed. Never went back to anything that remotely looked like a touchscreen keyboard.

      That was because it was a POS membrane-switch thing. This will be a glass-front, capactive-touch (and likely multitouch) never-wears-out thing.

      BIG difference.

    4. Re:Ugh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      ...And in our next exhibit, a headphone jack resting on the Esc key.

      It took humanity great courage to make this evolutionary leap, but it was worth it!

      Yes it did. And yes it is.

    5. Re:Ugh by adolf · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      I've been inside of numerous non-Apple laptops that had capacitive buttons for such features.

      It's probably cheaper than switches, too.

    6. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm No and another No.

    7. Re:Ugh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      I've been inside of numerous non-Apple laptops that had capacitive buttons for such features.

      It's probably cheaper than switches, too.

      Well, if he described "wear out" , I would be surprised if that was a Capacitive Switch.

    8. Re:Ugh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Ummm No and another No.

      History will prove you wrong.

    9. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the 1 button mouse.... or black and white displays, or completely removing SD card slots from all mobile devices. Not! Meanwhile, the future will prove that Macs4all is a stupid motherfucker. You're a 60 year old limp-dick asshole who's dumped so much of your retirement savings into Apple shitware that you couldn't possibly dig yourself out. I bet you want to be buried underneath Steve Jobs and rotated 180 degrees so you can lick his asshole in the afterlife. Go fuck yourself, deluded zealot.

    10. Re:Ugh by macs4all · · Score: 0

      Just like the 1 button mouse.... or black and white displays, or completely removing SD card slots from all mobile devices. Not! Meanwhile, the future will prove that Macs4all is a stupid motherfucker. You're a 60 year old limp-dick asshole who's dumped so much of your retirement savings into Apple shitware that you couldn't possibly dig yourself out. I bet you want to be buried underneath Steve Jobs and rotated 180 degrees so you can lick his asshole in the afterlife. Go fuck yourself, deluded zealot.

      Seriously? A one-button mouse meme? In 2016?

      And Macs moved on from B&W displays in 1986; so again, we're talking pretty damned ancient history.

      And as far as SD slots, Apple still sells at least one laptop with an SD slot. They have removed them because their research showed that only a tiny percentage of users (mostly photogs) used them on anything even remotely resembling a "regular basis". And since you can get a macOS-compatible USB 3.0 SD card reader/writer for the princely sum of $6.99 on Amazon, I would imagine that those who want/need the occasional SD card accessed, can do so without significant hardship.

      Anecdotally, my MacBook Pro has an SD slot, which I was happy for. Wanna know how many times I've used it in the 3.5 years I've had that laptop? ONCE. And that was more to see if it actually worked than any "real" need for it.

      Before that, I had a USB card-reader. Wanna know how many times I used that in the nearly 10 years I had it before I bought the abovementioned MBP? TWICE.

      Same thing with my MBP's Optical Drive. Even though I chose that model partially because it was one of the last Mac laptops with a built-in Optical Drive, I can count on one hand the number of times I have used it in 3 years.

  21. Thoughts by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    1. Apricot did the "Small display integrated with keyboard" thing with a bunch of their MS DOS machines in the 1980s. You could use it as a calculator, and apps could address it directly. It was a good idea, but the lack of it on the PC meant they quietly dropped the feature when they switched to making PC clones.

    2. So they're losing Esc, but they're keeping the Caps Lock key? Even Google has the design sense to lose that.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Thoughts by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      2. So they're losing Esc, but they're keeping the Caps Lock key? Even Google has the design sense to lose that.

      Try programming in a real language and the loss of Caps Lock is rather infuriating. And Google replaced Caps with an utterly worthless "Search" key which is an anti-ergonomic marketing gimmick, even more useless than a dedicated search box in a browser.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Thoughts by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If you mean FORTRAN, COBOL, et al by "real language", yeah it might have been once except for the fact the PC's implementation (CAPS "LOCK" is actually CAPS REVERSE SHIFT ON LETTERS) is broken too. Anyone who just wants a useful capitalization button has been SooL for a while.

      The "Search" key on Chromebooks can be search, it can be Caps Lock if you want that, or it can be Control or Alt. Google has made it configurable.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Thoughts by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I mean C. A language that, while quite old, people use for stuff like kernels that actually need to be reliable. And somehow, WebAssembly is supposed to replace all that newfangled JavaScript with good plain C (they plan to maybe add garbage collection primitives to allow languages which need that, but it's nowhere near priority).

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  22. Escape by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1

    Escape makes for a terrible Escape key. I encourage everyone to map their Caps Lock key to Escape, especially if you're a vim user.

    For Windows, I installed AutoHotKeys to do the mapping. For Mac, the capability is built in. Go to System Preferences -> Keyboard -> Modifier Keys -> Caps Lock to Escape. Linux kind of depends on your window manager. I assume you're smart enough to figure it out.

    1. Re:Escape by yorgasor · · Score: 2

      I've always used the CAPSLOCK as a CONTROL key, just where the good lord always intended it to be. Making this the escape seems a bit blasphemic.

      --
      Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    2. Re:Escape by krisbrowne42 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing that out - I was skimming to see if someone had before doing it myself. I normally remap caps-lock to control though, and the reach to Esc already had me doing the ^{ more of the time anyways... Even on a smaller keyboard the F-keys and Esc are farther than you should have to reach from home row.

    3. Re:Escape by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Capslock is control. It was where God put the control key on the first keyboard. The collective of fallen angels known as IBM moved this key in order to confuse mankind.

    4. Re:Escape by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      I changed my caps lock to backspace. Backspace is used a lot more than escape and the real backspace is in a terrible spot.

    5. Re:Escape by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Capslock (shiftlock) was above the shift key on mechanical typewriters. When you pushed it down it pushed down the shift key with it and then latched. You pressed the shift key again to unlatch it.

      Of course, as shift physically moved the hammers down, every single key went into it's shifted state.

      But pushing shift was significantly more demanding than typing any of the other letters (at least on any mechanical typewriter I ever saw) so shift lock was more useful when typing repeated shifted values than it is today.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    6. Re:Escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do it without AutoHotKeys like this:

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layout]
      "Scancode Map"=hex:00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00, 03,00,00,00, 01,00,3A,00, 3A,00,01,00, 00,00,00,00

      One does not need CapsLock position for modifiers or backspace if he is using a good keyboard like Kinesis Advantage, Maltron, or even Ergodox would do.

  23. Steve Jobs is dead and Apple jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the death of Steve, Apple has just made one bad decision after another.

    Steve was Apple and Apple was Steve. Without Steve, Apple is just a fruit full of worms.

    1. Re:Steve Jobs is dead and Apple jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We could just dig up Steve and prop him up in the CEOs office. Probably will do a better job and give a big boost to the stock price at the same time.

      Not sure if too soon or not. So anonymouse.

    2. Re:Steve Jobs is dead and Apple jumped the shark by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      Perfectly timed

  24. As can complexity by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not defending Apple. Can't stand to use them myself. Can barely stand Windows most days but that's because I like knowing what's going on under the hood. I understand what those little things mean and how to use them to my advantage to make my work easier. That's not the case for everyone.

    It's well past time for UI to have different modes. Have one that's for ease of use. Have another for power and expert users. It's not a matter of safety. It's a matter of different use cases. I am hobbled with certain files hidden from the UI. I am hobbled when I have to constantly confirm dialogs that shouldn't have needed confirmation. I'm looking at you, Excel. Yes, I wanted that file in a comma delimited format. Yes I want to quit because I already saved and told you I didn't want to change the format last time. Yes I am certain that I want to quit my quitting and not change the format.

    1. Re:As can complexity by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Apple and Microsoft both have shown a pattern of removing more and more features with each release. Even features that are likely never to be used or seen by the casual or untrained users. For example, Windows 8 removed the option to change window border size although it's there in the registry, and the default was the ugliest looking border ever; why change it when so few users could even find the setting for this? The power user is treated as persona non grata these days.

    2. Re:As can complexity by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple and Microsoft both have shown a pattern of removing more and more features with each release. Even features that are likely never to be used or seen by the casual or untrained users. For example, Windows 8 removed the option to change window border size although it's there in the registry, and the default was the ugliest looking border ever; why change it when so few users could even find the setting for this? The power user is treated as persona non grata these days.

      No, in MS' eyes, the Power User is supposed to know how to edit the Registry Key. [ducks]

    3. Re: As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what linux is for.

    4. Re:As can complexity by Shane_Optima · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's well past time for UI to have different modes. Have one that's for ease of use. Have another for power and expert users.

      "Power users" are the ones that have really got the shaft over the past 10+ years. It's distinct from (but broadly overlaps with) expert: the basic idea of a power user is someone who is fully taking advantage of the functionality that is built-into the app (including options in the config files or "advanced" tabs in a GUI), but doesn't want to built it him/herself (which includes but isn't limited to writing CLI scripts.) Some stuff I am probably an "expert" on, but most of the time I'm just a power user. I don't want to use a CLI to sort my photos. That's horrendous and clearly less functional. I'm sure emacs-dired or some old midnight commander clone would be functional enough, but I've never had the patience to sit down to get over that learning curve and configure it how I need it just to enable a few missing features.

      But WHY THE HELL SHOULD I NEED TO MANUALLY ENABLE THOSE FEATURES TO BEGIN WITH? Linux has had like 20 years to make a good GUI file browser and they've failed utterly. Why the hell are permission issues with removable drives still a thing? Having to open a terminal window to launch "sudo nautilus/thunar/dolphin" in a separate window, without any of my customizations (so everything is invariably some big icon, enabling me to see like 7 files at a time) to fix some ridiculous a permission issue that should've never existed in the first place... are you fucking kidding me?[1] No, I am NOT going to open up a CLI as a workaround for bugs (yes, bugs) in your 15 year old actively-developed file browser, and fuck you very much for suggesting such a thing.

      Why can't I tell at a glance where this folder is being mounted from? Why can't I tell at a glance what the filesystem is? Wait, what? You can't even tell these things even with rightclick-properties?? What is the POINT of having a "properties" or "details" if you're not going to even give me a hint about where the directory is physically located? When this sort of thing comes up I generally just give up and launch gparted, just to figure out what the hell I'm looking at. I'm sure there's an easier way, but the easiest way was obviously for my file browser to actually give me a few scraps of information about the goddamn files .

      Why does this "places" view vs. "tree" view dichotomy still exist? It's senselessly crippled almost every single Linux file browser I've ever seen, to one extent or another. It renders pcmanfm unusable. It used to render thunar unusable, but they've fixed it now. Sort of. Still completely impossible to tell apart a lot of the entries in the left pane: 32GB removable drive, 32GB removable drive, 32GB removable drive, god fucking forbid you show me anything like a vendor name or a graphic representing used space or the file system or something. Dolphin is a bit better at it, as I recall, but I've never gotten around to getting Qt dark theming to work properly.

      Why is there no "undo"?[2] Why the fuck can't I simply control-z to undo a partial file file move after I realize there's not enough space... wait just a goddamned second, WHY DID YOU EVEN BEGIN THE MOVE OPERATION WITHOUT FIRST CHECKING TO SEE IF I HAD ENOUGH SPACE?

      Oh look, now there's a filename collision during my 2 TB copy, which you helpfully paused about 30 seconds into it (and I've been gone for an hour eating lunch, thinking you were busy finishing said goddamn copy operation.) Couldn't you have just keep going and ask me about duplicate filenames after you've copied all the other thousands of files that weren't duplicates?

      Oh look, in addition to the file name being the same, the file size is also the same. Hmm. It says "resume_latest.odt". Well, is it the same file or isn't it? Why the hell aren't you telling me the goddamned modified date on the file? And why didn't you run a hash? Y

    5. Re:As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anymore. With Windows 10, half the updates are of the form "removed the registry setting that people were using to re-enable the feature we removed in the previous update".

      They must be really hell-bent on getting rid of people using Windows, when even "people are using freaking REGEDIT to re-enable the features we remove" doesn't make them stop and think "wait a minute, maybe we are not improving things for users".

    6. Re:As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell are permission issues with removable drives still a thing?

      They weren't 20 years ago when I started using Linux. Granted, back then I had to add the word "user" to /etc/fstab (once), but then again, I didn't even have a file manager back then.

      What kind of modern installer doesn't automatically add the word "user" to removable drives?

      (Granted, that only works for FAT*, UDF and possibly NTFS (if you can access NTFS at all), if your removable drive is using a *nix filesystem, permissions will work as normally - but then it won't work on Windows etc. anyway).

    7. Re:As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I've seen that mentality before. I very briefly worked on the appdev team at my state's attorney general office. They were rewriting, slowly and poorly, several applications they'd outsourced, two or three times, at great expense and decided they didn't like.

      Every time I'd find something dumb or weird, from either a design or end-user standpoint, I'd be blown off. If I sent vague specs back with questions, I got the same specs back weeks later. In five months, I never once had any interaction with an end-user.

      Their attitude was basically that the users (including even the general public in some cases) would get whatever they felt like giving them whenever they felt like delivering it. And it seems to be an awfully damned common attitude in IT departments. We've got the wrong people making decisions they're nowhere near qualified to make and it's costing a fortune.

    8. Re:As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell are permission issues with removable drives still a thing?

      Because you need superuser permission to mount the drives, and you need to give the mount command flags to have a certain user be able to write to them (assuming it's a filesystem like FAT where no permissions exist). And some genius decided basically that permissions for everything should be written in Javascript. Yes, that's right. Javascript. Also, this post explains why these stupid abstractions are built to fail. You just need one program in the house of cards to be misconfigured and the whole thing comes crumbling down. That's why I stick to using the terminal, because it works. I'll manually mount my removable media and unmount it myself using sudo and give it the flags it needs (uid=1000), because that works and doesn't rely on 38984 abstractions. I don't use them personally, but I think it's also better to use a file manager that runs in the terminal (like Midnight Commander, for example).

    9. Re:As can complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome to submit patches.

    10. Re:As can complexity by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I would gladly do that (and I'm serious here--I would take the time to learn the language used, if need be, and learn the codebase enough to actually submit patches) if it appeared that anyone was headed in the right direction. But they aren't. Some of the things I mentioned are hard to implement, but some are extremely easy (better prompt dialogs and better behavior for stuff like file collisions) and yet almost no one has done it, despite having 10+ years to. I don't want to waste my life on a project that has head devs that obviously do not really care about regular, day to day power user stuff.

      Right now the only person who has that "holy shit, you are reading my mind!" effect on me (with UI) is Joanna Rutkowska, but her endeavors are limited to only those UI issues that concern hypervisors.

      Fork it myself? Sure. Some day. If/when I win the lottery, yes I will almost certainly end up at least forking something like a file browser, if not actually endeavoring to start my own DE.

    11. Re:As can complexity by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I was quite annoyed with myself last night, thought I got fucked up and wasted too much time writing a bunch of stuff no one would ever see... thanks mods! I guess I'm not alone.

      I do apologize for all the typos and nonsensically phrased sentences that must be up there.

    12. Re:As can complexity by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I did actually have a permission issue issue with a FAT drive a couple months ago using Debian 8 on Qubes, but I've forgotten the details... I was in a hurry to do something, couldn't be bothered to spare more than a few moments on it (during which I did little other than fly some flabbergast-tinged obscenities.) The hypervisor is probably crucial to the explanation; either Qubes did something strange or I did something strange in Qubes.

      That said, there's still something broken in the core of most distros; as I've said, there needs to be a "single user" configuration or perhaps I'm looking at this wrong and what's really needed is a "super-super user". Regardless, this option should be available (and the default for most general purpose Desktop distros) and should automatically renders moot most of these issues without compromising security. There's nothing secure whatsoever about refusing to let me look at removable device I've just mounted that has a *nix file system on it. Yes, I do use them on some of my flash drives. And it also comes up whenever you need to examine a system drive taken from another machine.

      Actually, come to think of it the overriding issue is this: security of system files (the system you're currently on), security regarding files (other than system files) that are considered executable, and security of non-system & non-executable files are three very different things, but *nix permissions treats them the same. That last one shouldn't be respected on a single-user system (or anyone logged in as super-super user.)

      I mean think about it: "Oh, this directory on this hard drive you've just attached says root owns it! Go away." is the same response the distro is giving for its actual system directories. That's ridiculously dumb. I understand that this is a natural consequence of the highly modular nature of *nix, so it's not dumb in the sense of having a flawed foundation, but it seems clear that in the spirit of this modularity a simple flag to distinguish these two states ("these are my system files and they are CRITICAL!" vs. "this is someone else's system files, supposedly. I dunno, I've never seen this disk before in my life. The files claim to be owned by "root", but it's obviously not a system disk.") can and should be added. It should've been added a very long time ago.

      Linux DAC helps in two ways on a typical single-user modern desktop: protection from executable files and protecting system files. Protecting *a foreign file on a non-system disk* from me just because it claims to be owned by 'root' serves no purpose whatsoever. This behavior is (on a single user system) clearly pointless and is presumably a relic from the days of multi-user UNIX.

    13. Re:As can complexity by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Just a brief addendum: there are probably some interesting corner cases here where it does make sense to take a file's permissions at face value (regardless of whether or not it's a system file), and/or where some system files would indeed reside on external disc. However, if you designed a new DAC system (as opposed to hackery that selectively elevates privileges on demand), this would hopefully be flexible enough to accommodate that, and the new DAC could be made to be backwards-compatible... I think.

      I'm still chewing this one over. The issue at hand that I've so far intentionally left underspecified is how to best differentiate system vs. non-system files.... one idea that is intriguing me at the moment would be to randomly generate an N-bit identifier during install that root identifies itself with and attach that to all files that claim to be owned by root. Seems simultaneously clever and moronic... or at the very least, somehow tacky. Hm.

      I'm primarily using these posts to think 'out loud', if that isn't obvious by now.

  25. Note to editors... by hyades1 · · Score: 0

    A lot of news media covered "Balloon Boy". How did that turn out?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Note to editors... by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      It was a great success! The father went to jail and they threatened to deport the mom; last I heard, the kids are in some pop-metal band still trying to get on TV. And all of that was a better conceived plan than removing the ESC key...

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  26. Act like a child be treated like a child. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comparing a power button to the dusty pause button.

    Go sit in the corner and think about what you have done.

  27. There is no escape! by sinij · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple listened to consumer concerns that complained that escape key had negative connotations and often triggered traumatic memories of entrapment and escape and male dominance. Therefore, to show its progressive stance ESC and Power keys were permanently removed. Instead, they were replaced with a single Sympathy key that does nothing.

    1. Re:There is no escape! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      New "1984" ad: "There is no escape!"

    2. Re:There is no escape! by npslider · · Score: 1

      That is DoubleNegative Bad...

    3. Re:There is no escape! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      New "1984" ad: "There is no escape!"

      and only the very privileged get to turn their viewscreens off!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:There is no escape! by PPH · · Score: 1
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:There is no escape! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no escape, and we're power-less to change it. Soon we'll be past the point of no return.

    6. Re:There is no escape! by nephilimsd · · Score: 1

      In the latest revision of NewSpeak, we have found that having both a word and it's antonym is redundant, as the meaning can be replicated with the prefix "un". The phase you are looking for is therefore Doubleplus Ungood.

  28. Relevent by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Well, since Apple seems insistent about removing important keys from the keyboard, why not go all the way?

    http://www.theonion.com/video/...

    1. Re:Relevent by Hardness · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like Lenovo!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Relevent by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Oh. My. God.

      At least mine was obviously a joke. If Lenovo wanted to guarantee that a laptop wouldn't be purchased, that is it. I feel like I got an RSI injury just looking at it.

  29. Developer machine by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year I shopped for a new dev machine (laptop). I decided to be open minded and consider the latest Macbooks as well. There were a few things that completely ruled them out for me, one of the biggest being that the keyboard did not have Home, End, PgUp and PgDn. I realize that there are chording / key combinations to do some of those things, but I already use numerous key combinations with those keys (like navigating to the end of a line vs the end of a document, selecting from the cursor to the end of the document, etc). Any laptop that does not include those 4 keys are totally out of the question for me for development use. Removing the ESC key is obviously, in my mind, yet another step in the wrong direction.

    The ironic thing is Macs are pushed as productivity machines for professionals. That is one of the reasons they are supposed to fetch a premium price is because they aren't just "home" machines for the masses. Which makes the stupidity even worse because professionals use advanced tools that use keyboards for more than just typing words.

    In case anyone wondered, the other primary hardware issue that eliminated the Macbook was the lack of a touchscreen (necessary for web development these days to debug and test touch interfaces to be consumed on mobile devices).

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Developer machine by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing is Macs are pushed as productivity machines for professionals. That is one of the reasons they are supposed to fetch a premium price is because they aren't just "home" machines for the masses.

      Macs are for professionals ... just not your sort of profession!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Developer machine by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Macs are for people who's heads explode if there is a grain of pepper in the salt. They are an assisted living device, really. For people who can deal with a healthy amount of disorder in their lives there is Linux and Windows.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Developer machine by npslider · · Score: 1

      Not for professional video editors... see the improved Final Cut Pro X
      Not for professional programmers.... see Apple Swift
      Not for professional hackers... see Linux
      Not for professional media creators... see the utter lack of new Mac Hardware

      Oh, you mean professional students.

      Kindergarten.

    4. Re:Developer machine by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh ..

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Developer machine by Malc · · Score: 1

      I didn't think I'd ever say this, but I don't miss those keys. Cmd+arrow keys is fine. Also all the standard UNIX keys work, like Ctrl+A and Ctrl+E. You've got a habit, which is fine, and if you really want the Mac then you'll find that you'll change your ways pretty quickly. The limitations of Windows drives me nuts... like when I see ^V in the cmd window!

    6. Re:Developer machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      professionals

      It seems that word doesn't mean what you think it means.

    7. Re:Developer machine by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing is Macs are pushed as productivity machines for professionals. That is one of the reasons they are supposed to fetch a premium price is because they aren't just "home" machines for the masses.

      Macs are for professionals ... just not your sort of profession!

      My local Apple afficionado tells me that Apple users have better things to do with their time than play games, watch movies or, apparently, pretty much anything that normal people do.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    8. Re:Developer machine by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Normally I have a real keyboard attached to mine. The only time it's not attached is if I take it to a meeting (where no development happens) or home (where definitely I am not working).

    9. Re:Developer machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI the next time you look at a mac for this:

      Home (beginning of document) = Fn-Left Arrow
      End (end of document) = Fn-Right Arrow
      Page Up = Fn-Up Arrow
      Page Down = Fn-Down Arrow
      End of Line = Command-Right Arrow
      Beginning of Line = Command-Left Arrow
      End of Word = Option-Right Arrow
      Beginning of Word = Option-Left Arrow

      Selection from the cursor is accomplished by holding the shift key while executing any of the above shortcuts.

    10. Re:Developer machine by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Hmm I haer davinci resolve for osx is quite capable that is on par or better than final cut pro x on all but colour correction/grading where it beats prety much anything arround and alltho esc is not used that much funtion keys are iirc.

      Before anyone tells my that davinci resolc cost USD1,000: it does not, that is the studio version whitch us overkill for most people even some pros.

      My guess is that there will be an option in sustem settings to display the esc and f-keys when touch id is not required, not as good as having the physival buttons but not a complete catastrophe the removal of the physical power button on the other hand...

    11. Re:Developer machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are for people who's heads explode if there is a grain of pepper in the salt. They are an assisted living device, really.

      LOL.

      I have been on employer provided Macs since 2008 for web development. I'm not that picky, so there are few things that really bother me, but having to find a workaround for ESC would piss me off every time I had to hit ESC (and I am frequently in remote environments where it is needed).

      Frankly, I am happy using a Mac as long as I am not using any of Apple's nifty enhancements. Every time I feel the hand of Apple trying to make my computing life "easier" or impress me with some BS, it grates.

      They seem increasingly insistent on butting in and making a nuisance of themselves.

    12. Re:Developer machine by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I don't look at the keyboard when I type. Even when using the function keys, I prefer keyboards with groupings of four but even if there are no groups I slide my finger up from F1 to find F5. I do web and Android development on a linux machine, but I also have to do iOS development and sadly my company will buy me one of these and I will have to use it. I've never looked less forward to getting a new machine.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    13. Re:Developer machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're open minded for considering a MBP? Hmm, going to guess you do IT admin work for a Windows environment. For those of us with a Unix/Linux background, the hardware of choice has been a MBP for a loooong time i.e., since OS X. For developers not doing Windows programming, MBP has also been the system of choice.

    14. Re:Developer machine by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      MacBook Pros do indeed have those four critical keys that developers need. They just quit labeling on the keyboards a couple of gens ago.

      fn-left arrow = Home
      fn-right arrow = End
      fn-up-arrow = PgUp
      fn-down-arrow = PgDn

      Now the escape key. . . I need it. Do I need to start pressing Cmd-. or Ctrl-z again? At least tell me.

    15. Re:Developer machine by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      They're not removing Esc. They're replacing the top row with a set of programmable keys. The default use will be to replicate what's there now: Esc and F1-F12 or the media keys. But I expect you'll be able to create your own, including Home, End, PgUp and PgDn keys.

    16. Re:Developer machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly enough the Home, End, PgUp and PgDn keys in MacOS work completely different than what you're probably used to using anyway so you are forced to use the keyboard combos to do what you wanted.

      Home/End go to the top/bottom of the screen not the beginning of a line like any other OS out there. Drives me nuts when I'm RDP'd and out of (now) habit I hit CMD+Left to go to the beginning of a line but instead that gets translated to Windows+Left on the remote OS and makes the window take over the left side of the screen....

      Also note that Macs do not have an Insert key at all which makes for a guaranteed mouse experience if you're trying to paste on some remote systems.

  30. The end of computing by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    It seems in the mad rush to monetize everything and everyone developers and designers have been forced to foreswear anything resembling common sense.

    As we have seen over the decades, Microsoft slowly but surely hid basic functionality from the user through every iteration of its operating system. I have a W95 machine where I can get to things faster than I can on my W7 machine, and substantially faster than on my dad's W10 machine.

    For its part Apple has liked to see itself at the vanguard of elegant computing, specifically the design of a computer. As we are all aware, nothing is let out the door of Apple which hasn't been dissected to the nth degree.

    While its operating system works, its flaws and quirks are just as numerous and like Microsoft, with each iteration they further disassociate the person from the OS, thinking they are making things easier. As the decision to remove the headphone jack from the iPhone showed, nothing is simpler when you remove basic functionality.

    Now comes their latest foray into the schizzle: no ESC key or power button. Nothing physical at least. Only some vague, wispy area to touch which one hopes will do what they want but will, as time and experience has shown, fail at every given opportunity.

    As the last two stalwarts slug it out for eyeballs, Linux plods along, years behind in functionality but always with the same mantra, "This year will be the year of Linux on the desktop!", as if saying the same thing over and over will make it true. Sorry, you are not Dorothy and you do not have a pair of red shoes.

    We arrive now at the beginning of the end for computing. Where once people could do what they wanted with what they purchased, where getting something done was held above what shade of font to place against a white background, now we must overcome the need to show how clever we are through our brilliance of design which lacks anything resembling ease of use.

    Within the next decade we will see how our vain attempts to design the most perfect machine will thwart the progress we so ruefully wish for. As is always the case, the more complicated a machine the more easily its performance can be degraded through simple acts. As the most recent attacks on high profile web sites have shown, thanks to the very technologies we claim will make our lives easier, we are now progressing to an age where we have made it much easier for those who wish to subvert or destroy that which is built.

    All because developers and designers are more interested in eye candy than functionality, reliability and simplicity.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:The end of computing by stevez67 · · Score: 1

      Common sense is not common, in fact it's extremely rare in the wild. FYI, Dorothy's slippers were ruby. People have never been able to "do what they want with what they purchased" because there have always been, and will always be, limitations. If you don't like limitations you have to design and build your own device from the ground up, in which circumstance you get everything YOU want exactly as YOU want it. Don't be surprised if someone comes along and tells you YOUR perfect device is shyte and doesn't suit them.

    2. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to nerd it up, Dorothy's slippers _were_ silver until they decided to make a movie of it.

    3. Re:The end of computing by npslider · · Score: 1

      Guess this just shows that 'sex does sell'... Even when it comes to hardware and software design.

      Drat! I should have not thrown away my old Atarii 800.

    4. Re:The end of computing by Zak3056 · · Score: 5, Informative

      FYI, Dorothy's slippers were ruby.

      If you're going to be pedantic and point out that the slippers were "ruby" instead of "red" then I'll point out that they were only "ruby" slippers because it looked good in Technicolor. The shoes in the book are silver.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Dorothy's slippers were ruby.

      And what colour do you think rubies are?

      Hint:

      Sorry, you are not Dorothy and you do not have a pair of red shoes.

      (And if you want to get really anal, Dorothy's shoes were silver. The movie people wanted to show off their fancy new Technicolor, though, so they changed them to ruby.)

    6. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I learned to drive a car in a vehicle that was a manual everything - shift, windows, seats, wipers - with no real personal safety and a carbureted nightmare of an engine. I am much happier with my current vehicle with modern fuel injection, automatic shift, power seats and windows, and many times the reliability and safety of that old death trap.

      I am saying that functionality is relative. You might like driving an old car like that, but nearly everyone else does not. Some people still use MS DOS, but most people are happy with the latest OS. I still use an old HP-41C calculator because I like it, but almost no one I work with would use it.

      In one fell swoop the market for cameras is decimated because you can not only take a picture on your phone, you can send it to people you know or post it online. But still people will be using cameras with film in them because they like the control they have over the entire process. Just fewer and fewer every year.

    7. Re:The end of computing by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      Just in case you haven't already been bludgeoned enough by pedantry, Dorothy's shoes were Silver. Something Something Technicolor...

    8. Re:The end of computing by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      But still people will be using cameras with film in them because they like the control they have over the entire process.

      I saw someone using a disposable the other day. I was in pure shock for the fact that those still exist.

    9. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Dorothy's slippers were ruby.

      If you're going to be pedantic and point out that the slippers were "ruby" instead of "red" then I'll point out that they were only "ruby" slippers because it looked good in Technicolor. The shoes in the book are silver.

      No one is impressed. Your white knighting is pathetic. Get a life.

    10. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes modern cars are better than older cars and smartphone cameras are good enough for most people. But how many people have you heard tell you how awesome that lighting->3.5mm headphone jack adapter is? Or how neat it is that you can't charge and listen to your headphones at the same time on the plane? Or how great it is that now that they don't have a headphone jack they need to charge their headphones?

      What it means now is that reputable accessory makers have only the lightning plug as an interface, so they have to license from Apple. And next they'll remove the standard bluetooth in favour of their W1-augmented solution that accessory makers will also have to license from them.

    11. Re:The end of computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is impressed. Your white knighting is pathetic. Get a life.

      The irony is palpable.

    12. Re:The end of computing by e432776 · · Score: 1

      It is odd that we seem to have a trend of features/functions/functionality being removed or hidden. I guess this is all in service of having things be "simple". In that sense, this is not the end of computing but rather the natural consequence of computing being popularized- we are now shooting for the mean.

  31. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the period where developers chose Macbooks was just a fad when naive younger programmers bought into the "open Apple user-friendly Unix!" spiel that Jobs played for about 3 years before the community had given him enough support and he could close things off again.

  32. That will piss off developers and power users by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Even when I not use vi, I hit ESC at lesst a hundret times a day ...

    Does mot really make sense to get rid of a key that is used by professionals all around the clock.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:That will piss off developers and power users by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a big assumption that just because there's no physical ESC key, that there's no ESC key. That remains to be seen.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    2. Re:That will piss off developers and power users by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      If someone coded up a vi fork so I could hotlist 12 or so of my favorite commands as virtual buttons on this display bar, without memorizing vi arcanery, that might actually be pretty cool, lack of tactile feedback and all.

      But no one will do this, the OS will probably be unable to tell that I'm even running vi in the parent Terminal.app window.

    3. Re:That will piss off developers and power users by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That actually should be no big deal.
      Vi(m) should be able to do that out of the box (macros!). After all the keys simply wil be F1 - F12 or the will be a setting to use an Fn key that makes the 'stipe' behave like F-n keys.
      ESC it self would not be gone, ctrl-[ is ESC, but on a german keyboard, that is close to impossble to type (ctrl-alt-5 or ctrl-alt-shift5, don't remember ... I'm on an iPad and can not check) so writing macros that need ESC is till possible.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  33. Re:poor vim users by TWX · · Score: 2

    It feels like Apple just missed being able to be the king of platforms for network admins too.

    Just as they got their OS truly ready for Linux and UNIX users to jump-in, they removed some of the page navigation keys. Many users put up with it anyway. Then they started downsizing on the ports. Many users put up with that too even when they had to now use a dongle to connect to a friggin' Ethernet jack.

    Now they're getting rid of the vast majority of physical ports, so no more console access, and they're now cutting-bone, not merely flesh, by removing the Escape key, a key used all the damn time by a lot of us.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  34. Media outlets by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

    Media outlets covering rumors? Well it must be true then. /s

  35. Come on, Gnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know you want to.

    We've seen Apple get rid of the audio connector, and now the power button. We all know you're close. Soooo close to sweet release thus inspired by your idols.

    Make a GUI without a cursor. I bet you could. I bet it would be awesome.

    1. Re: Come on, Gnome by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      iOS
      Android
      PalmOS
      Chromium ...

  36. Because. . . courage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://pics.onsizzle.com/the-face-of-courage-apple-was-referring-to-the-bravery-3706112.png

  37. Steeeeeeve! by sootman · · Score: 1

    A leak like this would have never happened if Steve Jobs were still alive!

    I mean, except for the one time he was on the cover of Time magazine with the new iMac G4 the day before it launched. But other than that... never!

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  38. The ultimate vendor lock-in by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    If this rumor is true, Apple will have succeeded in creating the ultimate in vendor lock-in because there will no longer be any way to escape from them once you've bought in.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:The ultimate vendor lock-in by kromozone · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how this would lead to vendor lock-in, can you explain what you mean?

  39. Emergency? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Will the virtual power key still be able to power off the computer when held down if the OS is locked up? I cannot count the number of times iOS has locked up on me and I need a power off.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Emergency? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      No need, it now uses the camera and Siri to recognize your frustration and preemptively reboot itself.

      On the down side, it tends to reboot every 20 minutes no matter what.

  40. Simpleton computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Macs are just computers for simpletons.

    Just give the fuckers and etcha-sketch and see how long it takes them to figure it out.

  41. What is the problem here? by Chmarr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On a Macbook (Pro, at least) the Esc key is on the same row as the function keys. The function key row is (ostensibly) being replaced with a touch bar and a oled display. So, it seems very clear that the Esc key will simply be part of that in the appropriate modes.

    And, given it's Probably going to be right on the left hand side, it'll be easy to press by touch-typists, who just have to touch-locate the edge of that screen.

    So... why all this drama?

    Oh. Right.... Slashdot.

    1. Re:What is the problem here? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I think your post deserves a little more love. If the OLED keyboard is one thing in one application, the entire reason for this is so that it can be another thing in another application. It stands to reason that the default case for terminal, vim, and emacs, would look like a real keyboard. Until the emacs guys make a version that makes all the buttons different flavors of cotton candy or whatever, at least.

    2. Re:What is the problem here? by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

    3. Re:What is the problem here? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      On a Macbook (Pro, at least) the Esc key is on the same row as the function keys. The function key row is (ostensibly) being replaced with a touch bar and a oled display. So, it seems very clear that the Esc key will simply be part of that in the appropriate modes.

      And, given it's Probably going to be right on the left hand side, it'll be easy to press by touch-typists, who just have to touch-locate the edge of that screen.

      And one of the images shows a key labeled "Cancel" on the left side of the touch bar.

      The Esc key is used to close dialogs in macOS (and in Windows and in a bunch of desktop environments on UN*X+{X11,Wayland,Mir}), as a keyboard accelerator for the Cancel key.

      So one possibility is that Terminal labels that part of the touch bar "Esc" (or, in Apple hipster lower-case style, "esc"), and touching it sends \033 down the pseudo-tty to the currently-running program. That's the one I'm putting my money on, although I'm biased by being a microEmacs user who would want that to be the case.

    4. Re:What is the problem here? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      So one possibility is that Terminal labels that part of the touch bar "Esc" (or, in Apple hipster lower-case style, "esc"), and touching it sends \033 down the pseudo-tty to the currently-running program. That's the one I'm putting my money on, although I'm biased by being a microEmacs user who would want that to be the case.

      Although the "Cancel" isn't directly above the (~ `) key, so it's not quite where the esc key is currently, which could interfere with muscle memory, grumble grumble. We'll have to see what Terminal does with the touch bar.

  42. All part of Apple's master plan.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all part of Apple's master plan. They're going to keep eliminating keyboard keys until they get it down to just one, so it'll be the same as the mouse.

    It's not like users really need more than one key which activates the "do what Apple thinks I should do" program anyway. ;)

    1. Re:All part of Apple's master plan.. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      The ideal solution is a force sensitive keyboard. It has one key. What
      character is generated depends on how hard you hit it. You could add vectors to it for unicode, too!

      I'm a genius. I expect a recruiting call from Apple by tomorrow!

    2. Re: All part of Apple's master plan.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The geniuses at Apple all work in retail at the Apple Stores. They are the ones who reported back about the common problem of lint buildup in the headphone jack. Thank goodness their suggestions got through to the non-genius employees at Headquarters.

  43. Eliminate the keyboard entirely.... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    just dictate everything you want to write to Siri.
    Apple could save a fortune and make truly cutting-edge laptops by eliminating the keyboard, the mouse, the screen, and do everything in the cloud. It's a virtual laptop!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Eliminate the keyboard entirely.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssshh... don't give them ideas.

    2. Re:Eliminate the keyboard entirely.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... it's called the iPad.

    3. Re:Eliminate the keyboard entirely.... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Even better: after getting rid of the keyboard, they could make the screen, well, to coin a new term right here - "touchable" - and even put a keyboard on it! Even better, you could cut the laptop down to a single screen that acts as a keyboard and mouse!

  44. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This.

    Actually, I have a Macbook at work. Beats hell out of having to use Putty to get into our Linux boxes (which alas are not allowed on the desktop).

    But I don't waste my time with the Macbook keyboard, or even the external Mac keyboard which oddly is exactly the same size and configuration as the built-in keyboard. I use an external bluetooth keyboard which has real (not chiclet) keys, numeric pad, etc.

    I suppose at some point Apple will take that option away too. Bastards.

  45. Presumably cost cutting by waspleg · · Score: 1

    just like other dumb shit like removing CMOS batteries in HP Stream "laptops".

    1. Re: Presumably cost cutting by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Then how do they zap PRAM???

  46. vi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though I'm not sure about the usefulness of a displaybar I don't understand why I would have trouble using a non-physical ESC-key in the upper-left corner - that is if it has force-feedback.

    1. Re:vi? by D00MSlayer · · Score: 1

      You expect a touch-based, contextual menu display bar to maintain functionality for the long haul?

      Brave man, you are.

  47. Re:poor vim users by mlts · · Score: 2

    Could be worse. My last job issued me a Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon where the F-keys were on a touch LCD or e-ink bar. Said Lenovo had the tilde key moved under the enter key, and had no capslock key (instead, the page up/down buttons were moved to the capslock key's location.) Reach for the escape key, there go your F-keys until you tap that area again, due to it being the FN toggle.

    I just hope Apple's offering isn't as bad... I really don't want to have to bring along a Bluetooth keyboard just so I can type without fumbling.

  48. Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Theovon · · Score: 2

    I think one of the problems with Apple keyboards has been the ursurping of the function keys. I guess we don’t use function keys, but it took a little getting used to the fact that F3 doesn’t mean F3 unless you hold down the Fn key at the same time. And then every new Mac seems to change what the keys mean. If instead there were a row at the top of the keyboard that’s touch sensitive and which can change labels for all of those keys, that would actually make things a lot easier. Hold down Fn, and then all the labels change to F#. Leave Fn up, and they present whatever set of hotkeys you want to configure them to be! Sounds cool to me. Presumably, the left-most one will be Esc by default. Apple keeps adding features to Terminal.app, which I suspect is because their own developers use the terminal a lot, so that functionality doesn’t suffer bitrot but actually improves a little over time. I’m not sure what they’re going to do about the power button, but I was never bothered by the old style where there was a gray button flush with the chassis maybe they’ll bring that back.

    Now, what I still think is crazy is the removal of the audio jack. That’s GOT to be getting Apple mountains of feedback from people complaining that they can’t listen and charge at the same time. We’ll see what impact that has when iPhone 8 comes out.

    1. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      canâ(TM)t listen and charge at the same time

      Then you haven't seen the Apple "Magic" Mouse. It's wireless, but when the battery is flat, you have to charge it. Seems normal? Well, the hole to plugin the charger is UNDER the mouse. You have to turn it on its side or upside-down to charge. Don't worry, though, it "only" takes 2 hours.

      Oh how we laughed a few days after my boss received his. The language coming from his office was quite colourful because he was late for his deadline. I had to find him a wired Dell mouse.

    2. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by pz · · Score: 1

      I use the Fn keys every day to switch between virtual desktops (and thus between applications, as I use each of my F1-F12 desktops for a separate application; can't figure out why everyone doesn't do that since it's gobs faster than using the mouse or Alt-Tab). I won't ever, ever be buying a computer that lacks the function keys. Ever. It would be highly counter-productive to do so for me. If I were forced to use such a keyboard, it would only serve to engender deep resentment to the manufacturer who created such an abomination, and the organization that required its use.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I guess we don’t use function keys, but it took a little getting used to the fact that F3 doesn’t mean F3 unless you hold down the Fn key at the same time.

      Go to "System Preferences" -> "Keyboard" -> "Use all F1 F2, etc." Then all your F keys will be F keys again. I do this because I have a program that uses F keys to F things.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know, but I use things like the volume controls even more. About the only times I use F keys is to get to the debug screen in Minecraft and to get to the BIOS when I’m using an IPMI console and booting a server.

    5. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "F3 doesn’t mean F3 unless you hold down the Fn key at the same time" You can change that in the Keyboard settings, Keyboard tab "Use all F1, F2 ..."

    6. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only use I have ever found for the function keys was the old F3 to repeat search. And since that seems to be broken in half the programs I use the function keys have been pretty much gathering dust. Whereas my use of ESC has remained pretty much static.

    7. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, that's nice, and will probably be welcomed. Keys that change to what they'll be when you press them make the whole "alt-graphics symbols and accents" pain in the ass suddenly obvious. (wait, you can't set the F'ness vs hotkeyness priority preference in settings? augh).

      I guess the worry is that ESC is nice and rooty, and if the keyboard firmware crashes you're out of luck. This reminds me of the old "no physical eject button" choice more than anything. How many people were burned by that?

    8. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can change the keyboard to have the function keys work as normal without pressing Fn in the keyboard preferences.

    9. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate that change of function keys not being function keys without hitting fn; at least that can be changed though, in system preferences that feature can be disabled. It's not without precedent; the IBM PCjr did the same thing in 1984, only the function keys shared the same key as the number keys (there was no numeric keypad). There were a lot of reasons the PCjr failed, and this likely didn't help.

    10. Re:Soft keys with changable keycaps? by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      I won't ever, ever be buying a computer that lacks the function keys. Ever...

      Amen, oops, I mean... same here. I wish we could un-map all the "labeled" functions (dim, brighter, volume up/down, whatever), so I could just use the F-keys the way I try to: as shortcuts that are app-specific.

      With the Sierra latest update my early-2016 MacBook Pro now "repeats/duplicates" F-keys 1-3 (or maybe 4?) onto F13-19. I had to go back and do some triage in my main text editor and Virtual Box, in order to artificially limit my extended keyboard to 12 function keys. Totally insane!

  49. Editor's note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors"

    and yet there's a climate change article almost weekly...

    le sigh

    1. Re:Editor's note by Megol · · Score: 1

      'Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors"

      and yet there's a climate change article almost weekly...

      Not "almost weekly" but climate change != leaks nor rumors.

      le sigh

      Indeed.

  50. Re:poor vim users by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > Now if Linux laptops were more ubiquitous

    This is the era of Google. If you're something more than a total sheep consumer, there's really no excuse for you to be unaware of where you can get more interesting products.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  51. Re:poor vim users by war4peace · · Score: 1

    You must be a Linux guy.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  52. Use the keyboard Luke by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Ctrl-E goes to the end of the line, Ctrl-A to the beginning. Thank you Emacs.

    Shift-Command-DownArrow Selects from the current cursor position to the end of the document... Shift-DownArrow adds to the selection a line at a time.

    I've never missed any of the keys you mention as a developer, because the Mac has a number of keyboard modifiers (ctrl-option-command-shift) and they almost always do an excellent and intuitive job being stacked. I cannot think of anything the four keys you mentioned do that I cannot do easily with keystroke commands, and on OS X almost any document dealing with text will have those keystrokes work the same way.

    The ironic thing is Macs are pushed as productivity machines for professionals.

    Hey Alanis, thats not ironic - they are far more useful systems for professionals because between hardware and software they are more reliable and consistent.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Use the keyboard Luke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More consistent?! BAHAHAHAHAHHAHA i suppose you're not very familiar with applications like iMovie?! That thing gets changed drastically every single version, things that used to be in one place just move to a totally different place for absolutely no reason at all, which even makes it a nightmare just to try and seek help on how to do something because it's different in every version.

      And even simple stuff like typing in a network location in an open file dialog, sorry you can't do that. No you have to go and mount your network location in Finder first or you have to browse the entire network and drill down to the machine and file you want.

      But the worst recent change is to gatekeeper, notice how in Sierra they removed the "apps from anywhere" option from gatekeeper? Now your only options are "App Store" and "App Store and identified developers". Of course the fanboys said "no apple would never remove that option, they would never try and lock you in to their store" but obviously that *is* happening already. They're well on their way to locking it down to only Apple-approved programs and now with this change it's going to be "oh sorry even alternative OSes won't work properly because we've taken away all the function keys and the ESC key and hidden them behind a proprietary secret layer".

      People like yourself the just the frogs in the slowly boiling water, but even when you're told about it you're more interested in defending Apple than seeing what's going on. So when are you going to catch on Nancy? Anytime soon or just keep on worshipping Apple whatever they do to you?

  53. Coin slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the very near future, Apple's going to be adding a coin slot to their desktop, and maybe portable, computer line-up. Sometime after that, the coin slot is going to become a token slot, whereby only official Apple-blessed tokens will work. One token will cost $30.00. The coin/token system is a work-in-progress.

    1. Re:Coin slot by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and if no one to pick them it will be easy just bypass it.

      Now let's make mac os DLC based.

  54. Umm, actually Emacs is based around M-x... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I know you were joking but in Emacs the magic gateway to commands is M-x - which stands for meta-x. Yes Esc-x works, but you can also use Option-x in Aquamacs...

    Sadly it seems like the terminal version of Emacs does rely only on Esc to get to M-x, Option-x inserts some special character. I hope they fix that default but it can be re-bound as needed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Umm, actually Emacs is based around M-x... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a meta key on a keyboard since the Reagan Administration.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  55. No, Maximalism by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What is the obsession with removing functionality?

    What is the obsession with claiming something has been removed, when a million new things in a superset have replaced them...

    They are taking away the top row on function keys (and Esc) and in return giving you an INFINITE NUMBER OF POSSIBLE KEYS. How is that less???

    Many apps never need Esc so why would it matter if it is gone? Presumably when the desktop is up or any key that needs esc, it would present that opinion in the standard location.

    None of this is being done because of aesthetic reasons, it's for improving control of software. Being older you should appreciate this!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, Maximalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in terms of interoperability are they going to expose this interface or is it going to be private APIs that only their OS can access?

  56. Editor's note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Editor's note: We usually tend to avoid covering leaks and rumors, but...

    Latest WikiLeaks Reveal Suggests Facebook Is Too Close For Comfort With Clinton

    Right...

  57. Hint: Alt is Meta by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Alt (or Option on some keyboard) is functionally the same as Meta in the modern context (though yes I know there used to be keyboards with a real Meta key).

    Even Windows keyboards still have Alt...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hint: Alt is Meta by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      And of course, the "command" or "windows" key is really super.

      Losing the keys on this Apple keyboard isn't great, but Chromebook keyboards are bad too -- no super key!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Hint: Alt is Meta by hey! · · Score: 1

      Sure, but what is "Hyper"?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  58. Re:poor vim users by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    Courage!

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  59. Right because Apple has no experience with touch.. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Only some vague, wispy area to touch which one hopes will do what they want but will, as time and experience has shown, fail at every given opportunity.

    Actually what experience has shown is that Apple gets Touch right, every time.

    For years Apple has the only laptop trackpad I could stand using.

    For years now Apple has made touch the singular way people interact with mobile devices - one that work at every opportunity, not fail...

    Apple has also been doing an excellent job of integrating haptic feedback with touch, on both the Apple Watch and newer trackpads along with the iPhone.

    So all signs point to a haptic-feedback touch bar with great responsiveness and accuracy... certainly not the grim picture you paint.

    I personally am really looking forward to having function keys I never used replaced by clean commands in most apps I certainly will use. It's like gaining an extra row of keys, not losing anything.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  60. Re: poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you confessing to murder?

  61. Re:poor vim users by linguae · · Score: 2

    I wholeheartedly agree. I've been a Mac user for a decade, and I bought my first Mac (a Core Duo MacBook) because of its well-polished Unix operating system out of the box. I loved my MacBook. Its RAM and hard disk were easily accessible and upgradeable; I originally bought mine with 512 MB RAM and upgraded it to 2GB a few years later. I also upgraded its hard drive twice; once to expand its capacity, and again when that drive failed.

    Unfortunately for me and many other power users, sometime after the iPhone came out and became successful, Apple started changing from a computer company to a consumer electronics company, and with this transition Apple started actively making decisions that have been frustrating to us power users. Upgrade cycles have become very lengthy, and Macs have also increasingly become difficult, if not impossible, to upgrade to the point that even the Mac Mini featured soldered components. I thought about switching back to PCs in 2013 when my MacBook was long in the tooth, but I didn't want to move to Linux or Windows 8, so I held my nose and bought a MacBook Air, making sure to max out on RAM and get more storage than the default.

    Now I'm facing the same decision given that my MacBook Air's AppleCare expired recently and I'm due for another laptop upgrade. On one hand, I still believe OS X is the best desktop operating system out there. Linux, in my opinion, is still rather inconvenient at times, and I find Windows an annoying operating system to use. On the other hand, Apple has shown repeatedly over the past four years or so that it doesn't care about power users and other highly-technical users. Based on what's being leaked, this upcoming keynote appears to be my final straw with Apple. What's the point of having a wonderful desktop OS if the hardware you're forced to use is dumbed-down, compromised, and non-upgradeable?

    It would be nice if either Apple offered licenses to run OS X on non-Mac hardware or if a team would work on a Linux desktop that meets the needs of disaffected Mac power users. But I'm no longer going to wait for Apple to change direction and release my dream product: an updated 2006 MacBook or MacBook Pro.

  62. Should lead to more use of function row by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    XCode uses F-Keys,

    Sure but all of those F-Keys will be back as clearer named keys on the touch bar. Which even better could change between editing source code vs. using IB vs CoreData modeling tool... nothing like a key to shift bounding boxes to match constraints!

    I think that will lead to more use of the function row for me. I also use Xcode for most the day, and I have to say I have never used the F keys at all because I simply have never taken the time to understand what they are mapped to - I use a lot of other key-combos with Xcode, just not those keys.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Should lead to more use of function row by lgw · · Score: 1

      Touch bars and membrane keyboards are no for a blaster at your side, kid,

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  63. Re:poor vim users by ogrizzo · · Score: 1

    Just remap the right CMD as Meta, and live happily ever after.

  64. Why not just keep using Esc then? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For anywhere Esc makes sense, it would obviously still be present, just not a "real" key (though that does not mean no feedback when pressed).

    However I think it's absurd to say chording is not ergonomic, there is no twisting involved to use Shift with other keys to do selection, or to hit Ctrl-A to move to the start of the line. In fact if anything your hand benefits from mild occasional stretching.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why not just keep using Esc then? by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      Depends on the size of your hands to some degree. I find that Ctrl-C Ctrl-V for example requires twisting the left wrist outward so the hand is angled to the left, and also requires stretching the fingers apart. The natural resting positions of hands which are together in front of you on a keyboard is for the hands to be pointed inward (left hand angled slightly to the right) with fingers not stretched in tendon tension apart.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    2. Re:Why not just keep using Esc then? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Depends on the size of your hands to some degree. I find that Ctrl-C Ctrl-V for example requires twisting the left wrist outward so the hand is angled to the left, and also requires stretching the fingers apart. The natural resting positions of hands which are together in front of you on a keyboard is for the hands to be pointed inward (left hand angled slightly to the right) with fingers not stretched in tendon tension apart.

      For what it's worth, when I do Ctrl+{something} on my MacBook Pro's keyboard, I move my left hand off the home row and, if {something} is on the left-hand side of the keyboard, use my index finger for {something}; that might even predate using an MBP. The same applies to Cmd+{something}, although I use my thumb for Cmd.

  65. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remap your vi keys to be like the old pros:
    http://xahlee.info/kbd/keyboard_hardware_and_key_choices.html

  66. What this really means by neanderslob · · Score: 1

    Well there goes my caps lock key. ;-)

  67. So you mean that literally... by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    THERE IS NO ESCAPE!!!

    1. Re:So you mean that literally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will not need to worry for long. Removing Escape key is just the beginning on the path to remove the Enter key!

  68. Obey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you have no Escape and all are Power-less.

    Mwahahaha-ha!

    Now, let me ask... is there a Caps Lock?

    *scrambles* to see the photo and there it is:

    Don't worry my little key, you're not an ugly Caps Lock, you're a beautiful Swa... I mean, Escape key. Yay! Let's throw a party! But first I need a sticker -- one than won't detach from the key so easy... hmm, maybe it's time for some transparent tape...

  69. Re:poor vim users by mrbester · · Score: 1

    Every keyboard I used at university had a different layout. Whichever it was, be it a 80386 PC, Amstrad PC1640, Mac, Sun SPARC, SGI, dumb terminal, every one had the tilde key in a different place. Then I went home and my own had it somewhere different again. Drove me nuts.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  70. Re: poor vim users by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    He's just a space cadet, temporarily lost in time.

  71. Re:poor vim users by AaronW · · Score: 1

    Apple is just preparing people for their next generation Macbook Wheel.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  72. Re:poor vim users by Princeofcups · · Score: 0

    No. We just won't be using macbooks for development any more.

    I've heard some immature whining before, but this wins the prize. You heard him. All developers must now stop using MacBooks because he misses his dedicated escape key.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  73. Re:poor vim users by c · · Score: 1

    ... of course developers use many other editor tools, but proper support of the terminal and vi is essential for a serious server-software (back end software, or IT admin) development box.

    What, you guys don't like nano?

    I kid, I kid... I have to "apt-get purge nano" on new installs too...

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  74. Apple finally solves by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    They have finally solved where to put the "Any" key that people new to computers look for.

    I wonder how long how long it will take for the first developer to add something to their app that will require the user to press the "Any" key and they will clear the top row and have an "Any" key present.

  75. Apple profits down for first time in 15 years by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    It's being blamed on fewer sales of the iPhone, with iPhone sales down 5%.

    I wonder how much these new hardware changes will affect sales of their computers.

    It must be courage, because it's certainly not logic.

  76. Re:poor vim users by DMFNR · · Score: 2

    Is there really a key on that keyboard that says "Rubout"? Does that bind directly to youporn?

  77. Re:poor vim users by postglock · · Score: 1

    I find Esc too difficult to type frequently as a vim user. I remapped jk to Esc a while ago now. http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Avoi...

  78. Re:poor vim users by skids · · Score: 1

    It's just a physical manifestation of Apple's driving philosophy: users should have no power, and no means of escape.

  79. Re:poor vim users by fufufang · · Score: 1

    the ultimate linux-based software development laptop now

    I run Debian Jessie on a Thinkpad T440p, it works great. I think Thinkpads are good for Linux in general.

  80. "Wrong" updates by stikves · · Score: 1

    I'm writing this from my Macbook Pro, and it is one of the best machines in my home for lightweight work, remote terminal, and web browsing. The keyboard was not perfect, but the trackpad is years ahead of competition. The screen resolution was nice, and it hooked up to my desktop display for longer work session. I was expecting a new refresh with a better processor, larger SSD, and keeping everything else the same. But Apple seems to forget the good parts, and tries to bring in unnecessary "improvements".

    It looks like I'm no longer the target customer for the new device. If rumors are true, it will remove full size USB ports, along with the headset jack, replace the physical keyboard with a touch abomination, and turn it into a "not so tablet" experience. If I wanted to use a tablet, we also have a Surface Pro, and it works well. However writing code, editing documents require a simple device, which happened to be my current MBP.

    1. Re:"Wrong" updates by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      I was expecting a new refresh with a better processor, larger SSD, and keeping everything else the same. But Apple seems to forget the good parts,

      If by "the good parts" you mean "a better processor", I've seen rumors that it'll have a SomethingLake processor, which I presume counts as "better". (I suppose I could be less lazy and find out whether "SomethingLake" is "Skylake" or "Kaby Lake".) I don't know whether the maximum SSD size will be > 16GB, but I wouldn't be surprised. (More main memory would probably help as well.)

      If rumors are true, it will remove full size USB ports,

      Probably. (Some rumors claim they'll do a MagSafed version, which would be nice when it's used as a power connector.) Hopefully there will be more than one; having only one would suck if it means "you need an add-on hub if you want to use more than one USB device at a time or use a USB device when it's plugged into the power supply".

      along with the headset jack,

      Courage! Just don't be bitter about it.

      replace the physical keyboard with a touch abomination,

      Replace the entire keyboard? Not according to any rumor I've seen, and not according to the pictures in TFA, although it might use the same key mechanism as the one the current MacBook does.

      Replace the function key row? Yes, that's the rumor this article is talking about. As long as I can hit a key (whether labeled "Esc" or "esc" or "Cancel") on the touch bar as conveniently as I can hit the esc key on my current MBP's keyboard, that'd work for me, although others might find it more of a pain than the current keyboard if they use function keys a lot. and turn it into a "not so tablet" experience. If I wanted to use a tablet, we also have a Surface Pro, and it works well. However writing code, editing documents require a simple device, which happened to be my current MBP.

  81. Open memo to Apple: You're Fired by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    How many customers asked for keys to be deleted? My guess is ZERO. And then we have the one port USB-C debacle of this year's MacBook. Soldered memory? No thanks.

    I am the customer, and the customer is always right. If you don't want to offer me the products I want, I'll find someone who does.

    Apple is going back to the bad-old-days, repeating the mistakes that got Steve Jobs fired.

  82. Don't need any keys anyway by hashish · · Score: 1

    Don't need any keys if you cannot turn it on.

  83. Re:poor vim users by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    the ESC key still exists. one can keep using vim (and if you real vim, you can remap your keys).

    in the way that i use my macbook, i have a main larger monitor + cherry keyswitch keyboard — with real spring keyswitches. waaay better for typing then any laptop keyboard (although typing on the new mac butterfly keyboard is quite good, as far as laptop keyboards go).

    when im at home and coding — i'm on my main screen + good keyboard all the time, and the macbook is off to the side.

    when i'm on the road — i still have an ESC key that works. i've lost nothing.

    your usage patterns may vary — if you're a heavy vi user that is never at home/office and only work and only use vim, then it may not be the machine for you.

    2cents

  84. PRTSC SCRLK PAUSE by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    hey guys, move over..

  85. But think of the children.. and the bootcamp user! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm trying to imagine if this is a pro or con for bootcamp. As in when my current Mac Pro that dual boots MacOS and Windows10 will finally fail and I'll be forced to build a crackintosh so I can use my escape key (for many windows reasons... including SSH connections to servers and needing to use ESC in vi). Where does the Tim Cook(iness) end? Why retire a key that has a purpose. Why retire a peripheral that has a purpose. There has to be a bottom line and that is profit. One cannot (as Apple has stated) remove a peripheral (headphone jack) to gain real estate that wasn't required (unless they owned the single largest bluetooth headset company.. Beats). They just need to actually stand up and announce it for all to hear. Removing keys from the keyboard cannot be a reduction in real estate. That is so 1990's when laptops stopped having the numeric keyboard section. The ESC key is next to the function keys and above many other chicklets (tilde, tab, capslock, shift and left-control). There has to be another reason. Removing the power key..which isn't but just another button located somewhere on the apparatus... is a deeper mystery that makes me worry more about bootcamp than simply pressing the delete key.. on the escape key.

    Peace out.

  86. Courage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, that takes courage. Next up: the "Enter" key followed by the space bar

  87. Re:Right because Apple has no experience with touc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For years now Apple has made touch the singular way people interact with mobile devices - one that work at every opportunity, not fail...

    Except for the physical buttons on it that still remain, if touch is the singular (assuming you understand the meaning of that word) then why does it still have physical buttons?

    So all signs point to a haptic-feedback touch bar with great responsiveness and accuracy... certainly not the grim picture you paint.

    Actually given that we havent seen the combination of display + haptic feedback in any localised form (in every case of haptic feedback it's one big button) and Apple's recent love of releasing the hardware now and patching in beta functionality later I would say the signs don't point to that at all.

    I personally am really looking forward to having function keys I never used replaced by clean commands in most apps I certainly will use.

    You'd look forward to shit on a stick if it had the apple logo on it.

  88. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No just using Windows.

  89. The Title is wrong by b783719 · · Score: 1

    They've kill Esc and power keys along with F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11 AND F12.

    Courage at its maximum.

  90. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you hate Ctrl-C?

  91. Da! by Audguy · · Score: 1

    *Campy Russian voice* Da! A good KGB keyboard!

  92. Ctrl or Cmd? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Do you mean Cmd-C/Cmd-V? (copy / paste)

    For me I use my thumb on Cmd, and the same finger (pointer) for C and V. But then I don't really adhere to home row positioning when typing either.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  93. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you type a lot the keyboard matters. If they remove escape, a key I personally use a *lot*, then that will have a real impact on my daily work. Sure you say, I can use ctrl+[. But I can also buy another computer which has the keys I expect. Macs aren't magic - unless you truly need one you can move to something else which you prefer. Is it childish to not use a system which annoys you?

  94. all these fake geeks with bogus outrage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The toolbar can and will be a mother fucking SED OUTPUT DEVICE! you dudes aren't geeks, ur just a bunch of pc gamers who managed to install ubuntu somehow...fuck off.

  95. Soon by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    My god, it's coming true...soon there will be just One Big Button on Macs that you'll press repeatedly to cycle through the alphabet. All hail the Apple Keywheel!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Next up- they'll remove the power jack so you have to send it in once a week for a $99 "AppleCharge" service to refresh the battery.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  96. Found, maybe? by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    Somebody told me it's next the headphone jack.

  97. Re: poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptops are overrated for development.

  98. Cat got your tongue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news Apple brought the remains of Mattel Electronics for use in exclusive the awesome Aquarius computer keyboard in their new line or MacBooks. Expect a new Aquarius mini expander soon for the USB-C connector for allow you to add 2 usb connectors, 3.5" audio jack and a life. Remember kids, as Aquarius motto says "Whatever happens in the future it will *FIT* this space".

  99. That's one way to boost the sales of the previous by melted · · Score: 1

    That's one way to boost the sales of the previous generation MBPs. :-) I, personally, won't buy a computer which doesn't have an Esc key. I find that key useful.

  100. Tilde and Accent Grave by Snufu · · Score: 1

    Tilde: "Yay more space for us!"
    Accent Grave: "Now that they evicted that deadbeat ESC, we can build that second story and get a nice view of the speakers."
    Caps Lock: "Both of you useless characters will do my bidding, or you're next for the 'OLED' graveyard"
    Tilde: "Says who? You don't manage the keyboard layout."
    Caps Lock: "Yeah, but I got incriminating photos of Tim Cook. How do you think I managed to stick around so long?

    1. Re:Tilde and Accent Grave by eyegor · · Score: 1

      Caps lock is only around because the Apple honchos are getting old and THEY NEED THE CAPS LOCK SO THEY CAN READ WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN!!!

      dumbasses.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  101. Re:poor vim users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often link images of that keyboard to show how bad and important keyboard layout is

  102. Weird times by drolli · · Score: 1

    As somebody who actually uses ESC in the way it was defined on most GUIs from the 1990-2010, namely "stop this input without commiting the change", I find that sad.

    However I came to recognize that the current UI designers seems to like "forwards" and "backwards" pre-defined sequences of things to endure by the user. And so they killed the meanding of the ESC Key in the same way as they already started to make UIs which do not use system/framework element just to look a little better (supposedly) and drop the meaning of the PGUP and PGDOWN key.

       

  103. Solution is very simple: key mapper by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    The solution is very simple: use a keymapper. I map my Caps Lock to Escape. I use Karabiner for macOS. And better yet, recently the Japanese developer Takayama Fumihiko open sourced it: https://github.com/tekezo/Kara...

    For many years, he has been maintaining Karabiner, and with every update to OS X/macOS, he was ready with a new version to support the new OS. It's astounding, really. Every year, I donate because it's worth it to me: https://pqrs.org/osx/karabiner...

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  104. Is OLED programmable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be possible that the ESC key (and others via software configuration) were included in the OLED?

  105. blind typing by sad_ · · Score: 1

    so no more blind typing, this adjustable key-bar at the top will have keys displayed depending on the app, so you will have to look each time what it's displaying now, instead of just knowing where the key will be (because it has always been there).

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  106. There will be NO third coming of Steve by eyegor · · Score: 1

    Geez... WTF is Apple up to these days?

    As much sense as some changes have made, there's been a consistent movement toward a bland homogenized, minimalistic product line.

    First they take the Mac Pro and turn it into a weird little trash can that can't be expanded internally. No more jamming the bays full of big, fast drives, no more expansion or video card upgrades. The result? I either keep using my aging 2009 Mac Pro or build a hackintosh.

    Then they take the MacBook Pro and take away the ability to upgrade RAM/Hard drive or do your own maintenance. The iMac is going the same way now.

    Then they take away the freaking headphone jack from their phone, which many people still need. Yes, I can spend more money to work around that issue, but I shouldn't have to.

    Now, the brainiacs at Apple are talking about nuking the escape key? I'm a Unix admin. I use a Mac to access my Linux server farm and pretty much live on the command line. All of my scripting is done with vi and the escape key is essential.

    As much as I love using Macs, I'm getting fed up with their "have it our way" attitude. They're following in the footsteps of AOL and Blackberry with their idiotic hubris.

    Ever since Jobs died, Apple has been coasting. There have been no positive innovations, just variations on a theme that ended when Steve died.
    No one's come up with anything good, so they decide to shake things up by making user unfriendly changes "just because".

    Hint to Apple: There will be NO third coming of Steve to drag your asses out of trouble. I've already dumped 90% of my Apple stock. It's grossly overvalued and when the current asset bubble burst, the value will be in the toilet.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    1. Re:There will be NO third coming of Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >No more jamming the bays full of big, fast drives

      Ever heard of a Thunderbolt SSD you fucking mong? Swear to god Slashdot it just a bunch of old fucks stuck in the 2000s...all the smart ppl moved on clearly.

  107. Netware confirm with escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember some of the text-based Netware config tools where you used Escape to confirm things. Duh !

  108. what a surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this usually comes with replacing the top keyboard row with a touch bar. it also won't feature physical f-keys nor eject/loudspeaker - buttons either. but i guess, you're saving that article up for tomorrow.

  109. Not seeing the problem... by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Of course, this change makes using vi damn near impossible

    And what is the downside? ;-)

  110. Foot pedal. by xtal · · Score: 1

    When I coded a lot for a living, I rigged up a a foot pedal for esc.

    It was bad-ass.

    Probably much easier now with Bluetooth.

    --
    ..don't panic
  111. Much ado about nothing by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

    Let me preface this saying that I can't stand macs and find them abysmal to use...

    This is clickbait journalism. They may be killing the physical key, but it's fairly obvious that they have a touch-bar above the number row. Chances are the ESC key is that e-ink looking 'cancel' button above the 1 key in the picture. If not, it'll be mappable and forceable to that bar.

    Now, if this was the full keyboard I'd be up in arms because tactile feedback is extremely important when typing on a computer, but its the topmost corner position on the keyboard that's isolated from other keys. If they reserve 2 inches on the top left of the touchbar for it, it wouldn't heavily effect the ability handle the muscle memory aspect.

  112. If Apple made a lifelike silicon sex doll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iDoll, let us imagine. Same as a regular woman except...no clitoris, maybe?
    No wait...how do I esc out of this?!

  113. Location of ESC key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A very very long time ago, HP on their 9000/300 and 9000/700 workstations put the escape key to the left of the left-shift key. (I promise--I have pictures!) This made it great for vi because you didn't have to stretch your hand off the main keyboard to reach the escape key. In time, I got really used to it. On modern keyboards, I remap the left control key to ESC, and the CAPS-LOCK to left control. And I know what some will say, but the !emacs in me didn't like CNTL-[. Since I hit ESC so often in vi, I wanted the key to be a single-press key, not a combination. And by !emacs, I mean not having to play twister with my fingers on the keyboard even for the class of very-simple-editing-operations.

  114. Need a physical power key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Systems need a physical power button for when the OS invariably crashes. Doubly so for Apple products that lack removable batteries.

  115. Just get rid of the entire keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA

  116. Re:poor vim users by getaceres · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity because I've never had a Mac and I've been using Linux for many years. I understand from a consumer point of view that a Mac is simply more integrated and beautiful so it attracts more standard users than Linux might but for a power user which uses Mac, what are those needs that any Linux desktop should meet for you and that they don't right now?

  117. Re:poor vim users by strikethree · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for someone to make the ultimate linux-based software development laptop now.

    I have a Dell XPS 13 with a 4k (close but not really) screen. It runs Linux flawlessly without any need for proprietary drivers. The screen resolution is claimed to be 4k but it is actually not quite 4k. Still, it is a fairly high resolution screen, MUCH better than 1920x1080.

    What more do you need? Pure open source software stack from top to bottom, high resolution screen, reasonable keyboard for a laptop, lightweight, great battery life etc etc etc.

    The 15 inch screen version may be more your style but short of playing games (intel graphics), it should be everything you need in a development laptop. I am currently running Linux Mint Cinnamon on it but you can use your distro of choice. CentOS, Slackware, and Arch have all been on the laptop.

    Oh. They also offer a Linux developers version of the laptop that comes with Ubuntu shipped on it.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  118. ...and replaced them with virtual keys by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    The Apple event shows a touch bar that, by default, has a button labeled "esc" on the left-hand edge, although, as I commented elsewhere, it's a little bit to the right of where the "esc" key is now - i.e., not directly above the {~ `} key - which, as I said, could interfere with muscle memory.