I would go further and say that those who believe that ordinary people think rationally and/or ethically in the spit second of crisis in an imminent collision are possibly sociopaths and should not be allowed near critical software that will these kinds of decisions.
You are incapable of believing that it COULD matter.
It's not an issue of capacity of belief. It's just that in this case it doesn't matter.
The actual Bechdel test, while hardly scientific, is useful because it can make us pause and think about unconscious and systemic bias. This test doesn't even make sense.
Creating incentives to reduce waste is (obviously) a good idea, but in what sense is this 'virtual' water? I suspect that they're trying to obfuscate by not saying pricing.
Obviously their brains will shut down since 99% of 'security' prompts are mere nuisances with no value whatsoever. The brain notices patterns like that pretty quick.
Programming, for good or bad, is essential in the 21st century world. Students should be exposed to it, and learn a little bit about what it is, both to make a (slightly better) informed decision about careers and to have some appreciation of the role of coders in the economy.
But there seem to be a lot of people that think a student can take one high school course and have a guaranteed high-income career as a coder. This reveals a great ignorance and condescension on the part of the adults - I very much doubt if any of them also expect a high school law course or biology course will guarantee a successful career as a lawyer or doctor.
Some countries are forced to capitulate to the Americans and their corporations out of tactical necessity. Weaklings like Mulroney and Harper *like* being vassals.
Hungarian notation was fabulous for its intended purpose: code that mixed C and assembly language.
Sadly it escaped.
Doesn't every self important developer think that their own code is the best?
Isn't that the definition of 'self important'?
The *employer* isn't valuing the degree more than that. The degree holder (usually) worked very hard for it.
And guess which one has more bargaining power in today's job market?
I didn't prescribe, I described.
Well, you inferred, but odds are your inference was pretty reliable.
I would go further and say that those who believe that ordinary people think rationally and/or ethically in the spit second of crisis in an imminent collision are possibly sociopaths and should not be allowed near critical software that will these kinds of decisions.
They are absolutely incompetent.
They were successful in achieving their true objectives. They were many things, but not incompetent.
Perhaps his concept of 'appropriate' is different than ours.
Unless they advertised a refund policy in effect at the time of the original purchase.
Allowing people to express their sincere religious belief
The world has a *lot* of insincere religious belief.
I gather you are advocating for thought police, as they would be the only ones capable is distinguishing the two.
We have established that there is a gender imbalance issue in the workplace.
We have established that there is a gender imbalance. Whether or not it is an issue is undecided at this time.
You are incapable of believing that it COULD matter.
It's not an issue of capacity of belief. It's just that in this case it doesn't matter.
The actual Bechdel test, while hardly scientific, is useful because it can make us pause and think about unconscious and systemic bias. This test doesn't even make sense.
I'm ready to believe it was all USA, posing as Canada
That's my theory for Stephen Harper.
It was, but that was some time ago.
Security vs. Liberty, It is always a tradeoff.
Wrong. If you're not paying attention it's easy to lose both at the same time.
Having water in the 'environment' isn't good enough. Or maybe no-one in California noticed the Pacific Ocean next door?
Many were quite vocal about it.
What "other enforcement"?
Against Google's competitors, obviously.
It's like asking society to help someone with no arms and no legs "get to an A+ level" in juggling.
It's quite astonishing the number of people who believe that that kind of idiocy is some kind of fundamental human right.
Creating incentives to reduce waste is (obviously) a good idea, but in what sense is this 'virtual' water? I suspect that they're trying to obfuscate by not saying pricing.
Obviously their brains will shut down since 99% of 'security' prompts are mere nuisances with no value whatsoever. The brain notices patterns like that pretty quick.
Programming, for good or bad, is essential in the 21st century world. Students should be exposed to it, and learn a little bit about what it is, both to make a (slightly better) informed decision about careers and to have some appreciation of the role of coders in the economy.
But there seem to be a lot of people that think a student can take one high school course and have a guaranteed high-income career as a coder. This reveals a great ignorance and condescension on the part of the adults - I very much doubt if any of them also expect a high school law course or biology course will guarantee a successful career as a lawyer or doctor.
We'll understand the expansion of space better once we figure out what space is.
are we happy an official finally offered a reasonable
Not happy at all. There's no way they would suddenly start doing something reasonable without a hidden agenda.
Some countries are forced to capitulate to the Americans and their corporations out of tactical necessity. Weaklings like Mulroney and Harper *like* being vassals.
No member of NATO could possibly keep anyone safe from the US because the Americans are already on the inside.