Or just the fact that she is marginally less hated than Trump ?
Depends on who you ask. According to the last WaPo/ABC poll Hildawg has a 60% unfavorable rating, compared to Trump's stellar 58% rating.
Or maybe she just doesn't believe that stifling people's ability to hate on you is something a presidential candidate ought to do in a land which is built on freedom of expression - particularly around politics ?
So she's all for hiring the mentally ill to go beat up her political opponents and pay people to shut down freeways to stop people from hearing her political opposition, but buying nasty domain names is too far for Principled Hillary? Naw. She just didn't think of it. I hear she's not good with computers.
So if two gays have a gathering of friends and family in a little garden, and a minister or whatever reads some stuff and asks the gays if they want to get married and they say "yes" and then the officiate says "grats you're now married" is the state going to bust up the place? Send in the stormtroopers? Throw 'em in jail for their faggotry?
Oh. Oh, they wouldn't. They would just ignore it. So the state's not doing shit to deny them their liberties. What do they need a certificate for? Do you even know what the state's interest in marriage is, why they bother having marriage certificates at all? I'll give you a hint, it's not a "grats on being good people in love" award.
as without such legislation same-sex spouses couldn't even see the other spouse in the emergency room
But the retarded private server Hillary set up so she could hide her corrupt and illegal activities enabled Huma and Weiner to steal an awful lot of classified material.
What "the liberals" have been after is actually delivering on the Constitutional promise of equal protection under the law. The law defines marriage.
Does the constitution define marriage?
Personally, I believe that was a mistake and the best remedy would be to have government get out of the "marriage" business altogether.
Aw, junior, it's so sad, if only you'd had a civics class you'd know what a retarded statement this is. You seem to think the state passes out marriage licenses as a "good job kiddos on your love" badge. No, the state's interest in marriage is divorce, so you cannot get the government out of the "marriage" business without getting it out of the divorce business.
See, 90% of the purpose of government is settling property disputes. Contract law. And the first thing you do in a contract dispute is deny that a contract even exists. So Alice is going to divorce Bob and wants half his shit, but when they get to the court Carol shows up and says she's still married to Bob, so no Alice can't have Bob's shit! Uh oh! If only there were way to short-circuit all of these "we were never really married" conundrums it would save the family courts a lot of headache! Hey, how about this? If you want to get married, go to the county clerk's office and make sure neither party is already married to somebody else, that everyone is of sound mind, reasonable age, not coerced or inebriated, etc. This is why when you get a marriage certificate you get a 30 page booklet with 1 page that says "grats on getting married" and then 29 pages of "how to get a divorce." So that's what the fags really got. Access to gay divorce court. Enjoy!
Jezuz H Christ when you don't even understand the point of government, maybe you shouldn't be spewing crap about what it should and shouldn't do?
I'd argue that violence is the resort of those who feel powerless, because they believe it to be the one form of power that remains to them.
Except the left is not powerless, and is not becoming violent against government power. They want the government to have more power, and they want the government to use that power against their fellow citizens to enrich themselves. Antifa is not anti-government. They're pro-establishment, and against the people who would rebel against the establishment.
Look at the anti-Trump protestors in the US, like the riots in Chicago, or the closing of the Arizona freeway. These were organized by Moveon.org (funded by George Soros, who also funds Hillary Clinton) and PACs paid by the DNC, including paid workers from Hillary's campaign. So the wealthy and powerful on the left (Soros and Clinton) fund and train leftists/anarchists to attack the populace (political opponents or just random people on a highway) to terrorize political opponents to not oppose them, so they can maintain the political power of the current ruling regime. I don't see how any of that involves "powerlessness." These people already have lots of power, and want more.
On the other hand, their victims, the Trump supporters are largely working class people who have seen their jobs leave because of free trade agreements that benefit the establishment, and their neighborhoods invaded by at best indifferent and at worst hostile foreigners for the benefit of the establishment (keeping labor costs down), and they're powerless to do anything about it.
1) "Racism" as an argument no longer works. No one cares anymore. It has become the left's "I get to win the argument automatically because I called you a name!" button. They've pressed it way too hard and way too often about shit that has absolutely nothing to do with race.
2) Intelligence is genetic. It has nothing to do with education. You take 90 IQ mouth breathers run them through a gender studies course and then scream "See?! The smart, educated people agree with my stupid ideas!" All you've done is indoctrinate people in your leftist ideology so they're stuck in a bubble and cannot sense reality. That doesn't make them right. It actually makes them wrong, but incredibly goddamn smug about it.
Yes, Democrats are pro-science. Republicans are only pro-science when it's conveeenient.
The Democrat platform requires the denial of genetics and evolutionary biology. I'll believe Democrats are pro-science when they can give me an explanation for, say, wealth inequality between the races that isn't just "evil white racism."
Let's have the government decide who can be married and who can't.
Pretty sure it's the liberals who wanted to mandate government issue marriage certificates to gays. This issue does not support your argument unless there's recent examples of laws passed to prevent same-sex people from having civil ceremonies and living together as "married."
As for abortion, it's reasonable to ask the government to stop people from murdering babies, yes. Has nothing to do with "controlling what women do with their bodies," but it makes for a nice moral outrage rant so carry on.
Why didn't they deny the content of the videos then, and why did Creamer and Foval resign?
Also, people have matched the girl from the video who said she shut down the Arizona freeway to pictures from the scene, and found her payment records with Hillary's campaign. Everything checks out about the Veritas story so far.
Also, can you give me a plausible explanation for how "clever editing" makes innocent conversation sound exactly like someone explicitly stating they hire the mentally ill to start fights at their opponents' political events?
Slashdot Mirror
And wake me when there are penalties (fines/taxes/etc.) for having "too many" offspring
If you ever did that they'd call it racist. It's not whitey popping out 8 kids.
The problem is real, it is undisputed and aggressive actions are needed now, if not better yesterday.
"Well, we don't know what we need to do, but we need to do lots of it! Now hand over your money and your liberties."
Or just the fact that she is marginally less hated than Trump ?
Depends on who you ask. According to the last WaPo/ABC poll Hildawg has a 60% unfavorable rating, compared to Trump's stellar 58% rating.
Or maybe she just doesn't believe that stifling people's ability to hate on you is something a presidential candidate ought to do in a land which is built on freedom of expression - particularly around politics ?
So she's all for hiring the mentally ill to go beat up her political opponents and pay people to shut down freeways to stop people from hearing her political opposition, but buying nasty domain names is too far for Principled Hillary? Naw. She just didn't think of it. I hear she's not good with computers.
What does this have to do with free speech? I don't think there's any shortage of people saying Trump sucks.
So if two gays have a gathering of friends and family in a little garden, and a minister or whatever reads some stuff and asks the gays if they want to get married and they say "yes" and then the officiate says "grats you're now married" is the state going to bust up the place? Send in the stormtroopers? Throw 'em in jail for their faggotry?
Oh. Oh, they wouldn't. They would just ignore it. So the state's not doing shit to deny them their liberties. What do they need a certificate for? Do you even know what the state's interest in marriage is, why they bother having marriage certificates at all? I'll give you a hint, it's not a "grats on being good people in love" award.
as without such legislation same-sex spouses couldn't even see the other spouse in the emergency room
Or they could, ya know, ask the hospital.
If you fixed those things would incomes between the races (in aggregate) be even? Why or why not?
But the retarded private server Hillary set up so she could hide her corrupt and illegal activities enabled Huma and Weiner to steal an awful lot of classified material.
What "the liberals" have been after is actually delivering on the Constitutional promise of equal protection under the law. The law defines marriage.
Does the constitution define marriage?
Personally, I believe that was a mistake and the best remedy would be to have government get out of the "marriage" business altogether.
Aw, junior, it's so sad, if only you'd had a civics class you'd know what a retarded statement this is. You seem to think the state passes out marriage licenses as a "good job kiddos on your love" badge. No, the state's interest in marriage is divorce, so you cannot get the government out of the "marriage" business without getting it out of the divorce business.
See, 90% of the purpose of government is settling property disputes. Contract law. And the first thing you do in a contract dispute is deny that a contract even exists. So Alice is going to divorce Bob and wants half his shit, but when they get to the court Carol shows up and says she's still married to Bob, so no Alice can't have Bob's shit! Uh oh! If only there were way to short-circuit all of these "we were never really married" conundrums it would save the family courts a lot of headache! Hey, how about this? If you want to get married, go to the county clerk's office and make sure neither party is already married to somebody else, that everyone is of sound mind, reasonable age, not coerced or inebriated, etc. This is why when you get a marriage certificate you get a 30 page booklet with 1 page that says "grats on getting married" and then 29 pages of "how to get a divorce." So that's what the fags really got. Access to gay divorce court. Enjoy!
Jezuz H Christ when you don't even understand the point of government, maybe you shouldn't be spewing crap about what it should and shouldn't do?
John Podesta, her campaign manager, owns 75,000 shares in a russian energy company.
You should google "genetics and intelligence."
Do you think CNN, Fox, MSNBC, aren't propaganda?
I'd argue that violence is the resort of those who feel powerless, because they believe it to be the one form of power that remains to them.
Except the left is not powerless, and is not becoming violent against government power. They want the government to have more power, and they want the government to use that power against their fellow citizens to enrich themselves. Antifa is not anti-government. They're pro-establishment, and against the people who would rebel against the establishment.
Look at the anti-Trump protestors in the US, like the riots in Chicago, or the closing of the Arizona freeway. These were organized by Moveon.org (funded by George Soros, who also funds Hillary Clinton) and PACs paid by the DNC, including paid workers from Hillary's campaign. So the wealthy and powerful on the left (Soros and Clinton) fund and train leftists/anarchists to attack the populace (political opponents or just random people on a highway) to terrorize political opponents to not oppose them, so they can maintain the political power of the current ruling regime. I don't see how any of that involves "powerlessness." These people already have lots of power, and want more.
On the other hand, their victims, the Trump supporters are largely working class people who have seen their jobs leave because of free trade agreements that benefit the establishment, and their neighborhoods invaded by at best indifferent and at worst hostile foreigners for the benefit of the establishment (keeping labor costs down), and they're powerless to do anything about it.
Do you think Assange just has everyone's email sitting around and can pass them out as he chooses?
Do you think this is new? When was "truth politics?" I think I missed it.
What's wrong with xenophobia? The American Indians weren't near xenophobic enough, and look what happened to them.
1) "Racism" as an argument no longer works. No one cares anymore. It has become the left's "I get to win the argument automatically because I called you a name!" button. They've pressed it way too hard and way too often about shit that has absolutely nothing to do with race.
2) Intelligence is genetic. It has nothing to do with education. You take 90 IQ mouth breathers run them through a gender studies course and then scream "See?! The smart, educated people agree with my stupid ideas!" All you've done is indoctrinate people in your leftist ideology so they're stuck in a bubble and cannot sense reality. That doesn't make them right. It actually makes them wrong, but incredibly goddamn smug about it.
How about the Chinese and the Indians?
Yes, Democrats are pro-science. Republicans are only pro-science when it's conveeenient.
The Democrat platform requires the denial of genetics and evolutionary biology. I'll believe Democrats are pro-science when they can give me an explanation for, say, wealth inequality between the races that isn't just "evil white racism."
Let's have the government decide who can be married and who can't.
Pretty sure it's the liberals who wanted to mandate government issue marriage certificates to gays. This issue does not support your argument unless there's recent examples of laws passed to prevent same-sex people from having civil ceremonies and living together as "married."
As for abortion, it's reasonable to ask the government to stop people from murdering babies, yes. Has nothing to do with "controlling what women do with their bodies," but it makes for a nice moral outrage rant so carry on.
"We are the Committee to Stop Cool Sex-Havin' Fast Car-Dirvin' Badass Science Sharing."
God made nature, so all scientists owe royalties to God. Checkmate, atheists!
whereas we've been over Hilary's emails for nigh on a decade now.
Didn't we just find out about the server in 2015?
There's many more connections between Clinton and Russia than Trump. If your big concern in the election is that you don't want someone who might be influenced by Putin in the White House then you should stay far away from Clinton.
Why didn't they deny the content of the videos then, and why did Creamer and Foval resign?
Also, people have matched the girl from the video who said she shut down the Arizona freeway to pictures from the scene, and found her payment records with Hillary's campaign. Everything checks out about the Veritas story so far.
Also, can you give me a plausible explanation for how "clever editing" makes innocent conversation sound exactly like someone explicitly stating they hire the mentally ill to start fights at their opponents' political events?
Having classified State Department documents on the laptop of someone with no security clearance is as substantial as a pinging server?