Also pretend to have no sense of humor. A Republican could ask why the chicken crossed the road and a Democrat would feign OUTRAGE because jaywalking is ILLEGAL and potential harm to animals IS NO LAUGHING MATTER and vice versa. It's all so tiresome.
BLM's stance is for peaceful protest, they do not condone rioting.
Funny how all their people show up dressed for riots and then the protests turn into riots, though. It's almost as if saying "we don't condone rioting" is just a smokescreen. I'm reminded of this.
What does education have to do with intelligence? If you've got a 90 IQ, go to college and get a gender studies degree, what's your IQ when you get out?
The rioters. BLMers were bussed into Charlotte by George Soros, the riots against Trump's rally was organized by MoveOn.org, the people who shut down the Arizona freeways were on Hillary's payroll. They rile up morons, and pay some of them to go terrorize the populace and their opposition and then they and the media say "stop opposing us and the riots will stop."
I call them the terror wing of the state. These people are funded and controlled by the same people who fund and control the politicians, and are useful so politicians can say to the regular working folk, "give us more money and power to 'fix' these problems and the rioting will stop." The rioting never stops though.
What do you expect when the other guy's argument is a bunch of "you and people like you are stupid and tricked" crap? Give a stupid reply get a stupid reply.
Clinton's got a lot more money than Trump. She ought to be able to match him here. Conscious Decision maybe? I just don't know why.
I looked at the article and they never explain how they determine whether a twitter account is a bot. An awful lot of Trump supporters on twitter are anonymous because the left loves to dox people with the wrong opinions and harass them or try to get them fired, etc. Are these really bots, or just anonymous twitter users?
If they're bots, are they paid for by the campaigns? Where's the FEC filings for the Trump bot payments? We know Clinton's spending millions with Correct the Record for her fake online support. Either Trump isn't paying for fake online support, or he's violating campaign finance laws by not properly reporting it.
Possibilities:
1. These aren't actually bots, and the article is fake. Leftists always accuse their opponent of doing whatever they're doing. So once Correct the Record became known, suddenly some story pops up and makes the rounds in the media that Putin's got troll accounts making pro-Trump statements. Of course, the interviewed "researcher" provides absolutely no evidence of this. Not a screenshot, not a single account name, no numbers, absolutely nothing. This looks the same kind of thing. The authors need to show their work.
2. These are bots and Trump is faking his FEC filings for some reason. That's a big story! Some journalist should get on that by tracing the origin of the bots to find out what company's paying for them, and how they're getting paid on the sly by Trump.
3. The Trump "bots" are actually 4chan users who spam twitter to disseminate their propaganda. Real people, real support, just anonymous.
4. The bots actually are from Putin, so they're not Trump's bots, they're Trump-supporting Putin bots. But again, we'd need to see some evidence of this.
My guess is #1. I see this technique too often in the media. Accuse the opponent of doing whatever it is you're doing, state "facts" without proof to create fear, uncertainty and doubt and generally discredit the opposition. "Oh, Trump doesn't really have online support, it's fake bots," distracting from the actual, provable, and disturbing fake online support for Clinton from Correct the Record.
Oh man. This guy doesn't know how tax returns work. Don't worry, one day you'll get a job, and then you'll see you don't put your net worth on your taxes. Thank God you're not old enough to vote!
We don't have a state-run media. We have a media-run state. The mainstream media outlets are all owned by the same 6 mega-corps that all have similar interests, and similar interests to the billionaires who control FaceBook and Twitter. These are the same companies that own the politicians. So the corporations choose the policies they want, the politicians enact them, and then their propaganda media brainwashes the populace with ridiculous moral arguments to convince them that of course, the government ignoring our laws to flood the country with semi-retarded 3rd worlders to drive down labor costs and atomize your culture is good for you, silly, and only evil Nazis want laws and borders and shit!
If you want a fascist state, you need control of the media, the suppression of dissent, and a disarmed populace. The left owns the media, they silence dissent in academia and the workplace, they send thugs including the mentally ill to disrupt their political opposition's rallies and discredit them. All you need now is for Clinton to enact her executive action gun control and that'll be all she wrote. Endless wars abroad, terror for wrongthink at home and no hope of dissent. This is the part where you wonder, "are we the baddies?"
Find a bunch of people that have never obtained their dreams, blame a bunch of other people for it
You mean like fat stupid women who can't land a job or a man because of "TEH PATRIARCHY!!!" Or blacks who are kept down by the Man and not because they smoke dope and sell crack?
Trump female supports who still support him yet believe he sexually assaulted those women is shocking. Not believing the allegations is one thing, but to believe them and go, "Fuck, who cares?" is something else.
The billionaire playboy says "would you like to come see my collection of erotic Japanese lithographs?" The woman who agrees, and once they're alone gets kissed doesn't get to cry "sexual assault." That's not sexual assault. That's either a very naive woman or a cocktease. And if she's really a "strong independent wymynz what don't need no man" then she's not going to be permanently emotionally scared by a failed pick-up attempt, which means she's spewing a bunch of bullshit crocodile tears for political effect right before the election, and should be derided or ignored.
Clearly the sexual revolution has failed and we need to bring back chaperones. Women are not competent to navigate sexual interactions when left alone with men.
I will believe leftists care about science and facts when one says "intelligence is primarily genetically inherited, and the average IQ for blacks in America is 85 versus 92 for latinos, 100-104 for whites and 108 for Asians. This difference in innate intelligence is the primary cause of wealth inequality and criminality in America."
They never will though. Their leftist religion requires unwavering belief in the lie of equality, between people, races, cultures, and the sexes, and they have visceral, explosive emotional reactions to anyone who states the plain, obvious and scientific truth that the races aren't equal, the sexes aren't equal, and cultures aren't equal. Everything in the leftist worldview is based on this insane premise, that no one in all of history until a few decades ago believed. Everyone in history was stupid and evil to believe races, sexes and cultures were different, but not our modern leftists who are smart and good! Everyone else in the world is stupid besides them, too. After all the Chinese don't believe they're the same as Africans and Africans don't believe they're the same as the Chinese so they must be stupid and evil to not realize they're the same. Everyone in history, and everyone in the world is stupid and evil except for modern, white leftists. They've got it all figured out. And since they know for a fact that everyone is actually equal, any inequality you see in the world must be because of evil oppression from white males, so just give the left power and they'll fix it through brute force social engineering, wealth redistribution and public shaming. All while skimming nicely off the top themselves.
Everything on the left is based on this one monstrous lie. Their leadership knows it's a lie. Their mindless followers believe the lie. The result is power and wealth for their leaders, and suffering for everyone else.
The weasel language I've heard is "contains inaccurate information." Which makes casual observers think "oh, they're denying the emails are real," when that's not what that means. 2 + 2 = 5. This comment is still real, but it now contains inaccurate information.
So, for all we know, the nebulous "inaccurate information" could be an email that says the Clinton campaign got $9 million in illegal donations from Elbonia, when in fact they got $10 million.
So they're going to gain 15 IQ points on average, drink beer at Octoberfest, nom down on pork mit zwiebeln? Gonna adapt that whole German work ethic thing?
You're acting like genetics and culture are arbitrary. I know that's what your leftist religion preaches, but that's a fantasy. You need to wake up to the real world here.
The least worst option would be to pick the politician, and then vigourously campaign your local Republican representative to sort their shit out and produce a viable candidate for 2020.
Not possible. If Hillary gets in she grants amnesty and we find out there's really more like 20-30 million illegals in the US (they've been saying 11 million for 20 years now). Plus she ramps up the importation of millions of more semi-retarded 3rd worlders. Texas flips blue and that's pretty much all she wrote for the Republic.
This is a war of the top against the middle using poor people from authoritarian cultures with high corruption tolerance as pawns to stuff the ballot boxes, starting with the Immigration Act of 1965. This is the last stand. It's Trump or slavery. Your choice.
So what one does is hack the 1GB of emails and then fake 10 that lay out your opponents' plans for murdering puppies.
Not saying that's what happened here. So far I haven't seen any leaks/hacks that appear to have fakery in them, but now that we've got weaponized leaking I'm sure it's coming.
You can debate all day whether people from certain parts of the world should be admitted to a Western nation, but almost all the Western nations are well below population replacement birthrates.
So how about taking steps to increase the birthrate instead of replacing the population? Replace Germans with Syrians, you don't get more Germans. You get Syria in Germany.
Exactly. I recall maybe during the pilot episode Harry was unsure about whether to call Janeway "sir" or "ma'am" and she said "ma'am" and that was about it. Other than that no one noticed she was a woman. There were Maquis crew members who didn't want to follow a starfleet captain, but nobody ever had a problem with her because "her der girls can't starship!" Only the Kazon and they were basically space muslims. But the humans/federation were always post-racial, post-gender.
And this is what pisses me off about the modern sci-fi fandom gender wars. They make a crappy movie like Ghostbusters 2016, and when it looks crappy fans say "oh this looks crappy" and then the marketing department starts screaming about how it's only evil basement dwelling nerds who can't handle girl ghostbusters! Um, we basement dwelling nerds have been cheering movies and TV shows with women and minority leads for 40 years or more. Alien(s), Voyager, DS9, etc etc. It ain't the nerds with the irrational hatred problem.
Which was a single episode, was an allegory for apartheid, and in the first season of TNG (the vast majority of which was crap) and no one liked it.
Just saying, Janeway's defining character traits were her curiosity and her hard-assed rigid adherence to rules and standards. But the way character writing has gone today half the time a female character's defining character trait is "woman."
Just to add, it's interesting that Star Trek was both post-racial and extremely racist at the same time. Yes, the humans didn't even notice they were different colors or genders. But every Klingon's a warrior, every Vulcan's a scientist or diplomat, ever Ferengi is a greedy weasel, etc. And sometimes the plot would center around the struggles of a character who didn't fit their racial stereotype.
It would be nice if they would make a new Star Trek series about exploration, discovery, science fiction, etc. By all means give us a post-racialism, post-feminist crew of diverse characters who don't even notice they're diverse. My fear is it's going to be Star Trek: Diversity Wars and the science fiction will be glossed over and every episode will be about how the strong independent wymynz what don't need no man character struggles against the institutionalized discrimination against strong independent wymynz what don't need no man etc etc.
Slashdot Mirror
politics makes people PRETEND to be stupid
Also pretend to have no sense of humor. A Republican could ask why the chicken crossed the road and a Democrat would feign OUTRAGE because jaywalking is ILLEGAL and potential harm to animals IS NO LAUGHING MATTER and vice versa. It's all so tiresome.
BLM's stance is for peaceful protest, they do not condone rioting.
Funny how all their people show up dressed for riots and then the protests turn into riots, though. It's almost as if saying "we don't condone rioting" is just a smokescreen. I'm reminded of this.
What does education have to do with intelligence? If you've got a 90 IQ, go to college and get a gender studies degree, what's your IQ when you get out?
The rioters. BLMers were bussed into Charlotte by George Soros, the riots against Trump's rally was organized by MoveOn.org, the people who shut down the Arizona freeways were on Hillary's payroll. They rile up morons, and pay some of them to go terrorize the populace and their opposition and then they and the media say "stop opposing us and the riots will stop."
Those are the people doing the rioting. The left approves of their riots, do they not?
I call them the terror wing of the state. These people are funded and controlled by the same people who fund and control the politicians, and are useful so politicians can say to the regular working folk, "give us more money and power to 'fix' these problems and the rioting will stop." The rioting never stops though.
What do you expect when the other guy's argument is a bunch of "you and people like you are stupid and tricked" crap? Give a stupid reply get a stupid reply.
Well, we've had several cities burned down with Obama at the helm and the left doesn't seem to care, so "civil unrest" can't be that big of a deal.
And what are they going to do about it?
Clinton's got a lot more money than Trump. She ought to be able to match him here. Conscious Decision maybe? I just don't know why.
I looked at the article and they never explain how they determine whether a twitter account is a bot. An awful lot of Trump supporters on twitter are anonymous because the left loves to dox people with the wrong opinions and harass them or try to get them fired, etc. Are these really bots, or just anonymous twitter users?
If they're bots, are they paid for by the campaigns? Where's the FEC filings for the Trump bot payments? We know Clinton's spending millions with Correct the Record for her fake online support. Either Trump isn't paying for fake online support, or he's violating campaign finance laws by not properly reporting it.
Possibilities:
1. These aren't actually bots, and the article is fake. Leftists always accuse their opponent of doing whatever they're doing. So once Correct the Record became known, suddenly some story pops up and makes the rounds in the media that Putin's got troll accounts making pro-Trump statements. Of course, the interviewed "researcher" provides absolutely no evidence of this. Not a screenshot, not a single account name, no numbers, absolutely nothing. This looks the same kind of thing. The authors need to show their work.
2. These are bots and Trump is faking his FEC filings for some reason. That's a big story! Some journalist should get on that by tracing the origin of the bots to find out what company's paying for them, and how they're getting paid on the sly by Trump.
3. The Trump "bots" are actually 4chan users who spam twitter to disseminate their propaganda. Real people, real support, just anonymous.
4. The bots actually are from Putin, so they're not Trump's bots, they're Trump-supporting Putin bots. But again, we'd need to see some evidence of this.
My guess is #1. I see this technique too often in the media. Accuse the opponent of doing whatever it is you're doing, state "facts" without proof to create fear, uncertainty and doubt and generally discredit the opposition. "Oh, Trump doesn't really have online support, it's fake bots," distracting from the actual, provable, and disturbing fake online support for Clinton from Correct the Record.
Oh man. This guy doesn't know how tax returns work. Don't worry, one day you'll get a job, and then you'll see you don't put your net worth on your taxes. Thank God you're not old enough to vote!
Twitter and FB are not state run media.
No, our government is a media-run state.
We don't have a state-run media. We have a media-run state. The mainstream media outlets are all owned by the same 6 mega-corps that all have similar interests, and similar interests to the billionaires who control FaceBook and Twitter. These are the same companies that own the politicians. So the corporations choose the policies they want, the politicians enact them, and then their propaganda media brainwashes the populace with ridiculous moral arguments to convince them that of course, the government ignoring our laws to flood the country with semi-retarded 3rd worlders to drive down labor costs and atomize your culture is good for you, silly, and only evil Nazis want laws and borders and shit!
If you want a fascist state, you need control of the media, the suppression of dissent, and a disarmed populace. The left owns the media, they silence dissent in academia and the workplace, they send thugs including the mentally ill to disrupt their political opposition's rallies and discredit them. All you need now is for Clinton to enact her executive action gun control and that'll be all she wrote. Endless wars abroad, terror for wrongthink at home and no hope of dissent. This is the part where you wonder, "are we the baddies?"
Find a bunch of people that have never obtained their dreams, blame a bunch of other people for it
You mean like fat stupid women who can't land a job or a man because of "TEH PATRIARCHY!!!" Or blacks who are kept down by the Man and not because they smoke dope and sell crack?
Trump female supports who still support him yet believe he sexually assaulted those women is shocking. Not believing the allegations is one thing, but to believe them and go, "Fuck, who cares?" is something else.
The billionaire playboy says "would you like to come see my collection of erotic Japanese lithographs?" The woman who agrees, and once they're alone gets kissed doesn't get to cry "sexual assault." That's not sexual assault. That's either a very naive woman or a cocktease. And if she's really a "strong independent wymynz what don't need no man" then she's not going to be permanently emotionally scared by a failed pick-up attempt, which means she's spewing a bunch of bullshit crocodile tears for political effect right before the election, and should be derided or ignored.
Clearly the sexual revolution has failed and we need to bring back chaperones. Women are not competent to navigate sexual interactions when left alone with men.
I will believe leftists care about science and facts when one says "intelligence is primarily genetically inherited, and the average IQ for blacks in America is 85 versus 92 for latinos, 100-104 for whites and 108 for Asians. This difference in innate intelligence is the primary cause of wealth inequality and criminality in America."
They never will though. Their leftist religion requires unwavering belief in the lie of equality, between people, races, cultures, and the sexes, and they have visceral, explosive emotional reactions to anyone who states the plain, obvious and scientific truth that the races aren't equal, the sexes aren't equal, and cultures aren't equal. Everything in the leftist worldview is based on this insane premise, that no one in all of history until a few decades ago believed. Everyone in history was stupid and evil to believe races, sexes and cultures were different, but not our modern leftists who are smart and good! Everyone else in the world is stupid besides them, too. After all the Chinese don't believe they're the same as Africans and Africans don't believe they're the same as the Chinese so they must be stupid and evil to not realize they're the same. Everyone in history, and everyone in the world is stupid and evil except for modern, white leftists. They've got it all figured out. And since they know for a fact that everyone is actually equal, any inequality you see in the world must be because of evil oppression from white males, so just give the left power and they'll fix it through brute force social engineering, wealth redistribution and public shaming. All while skimming nicely off the top themselves.
Everything on the left is based on this one monstrous lie. Their leadership knows it's a lie. Their mindless followers believe the lie. The result is power and wealth for their leaders, and suffering for everyone else.
How well did Obama do at preventing "civil unrest?"
The weasel language I've heard is "contains inaccurate information." Which makes casual observers think "oh, they're denying the emails are real," when that's not what that means. 2 + 2 = 5. This comment is still real, but it now contains inaccurate information.
So, for all we know, the nebulous "inaccurate information" could be an email that says the Clinton campaign got $9 million in illegal donations from Elbonia, when in fact they got $10 million.
No you are stupid.
So they're going to gain 15 IQ points on average, drink beer at Octoberfest, nom down on pork mit zwiebeln? Gonna adapt that whole German work ethic thing?
You're acting like genetics and culture are arbitrary. I know that's what your leftist religion preaches, but that's a fantasy. You need to wake up to the real world here.
The least worst option would be to pick the politician, and then vigourously campaign your local Republican representative to sort their shit out and produce a viable candidate for 2020.
Not possible. If Hillary gets in she grants amnesty and we find out there's really more like 20-30 million illegals in the US (they've been saying 11 million for 20 years now). Plus she ramps up the importation of millions of more semi-retarded 3rd worlders. Texas flips blue and that's pretty much all she wrote for the Republic.
This is a war of the top against the middle using poor people from authoritarian cultures with high corruption tolerance as pawns to stuff the ballot boxes, starting with the Immigration Act of 1965. This is the last stand. It's Trump or slavery. Your choice.
So what one does is hack the 1GB of emails and then fake 10 that lay out your opponents' plans for murdering puppies.
Not saying that's what happened here. So far I haven't seen any leaks/hacks that appear to have fakery in them, but now that we've got weaponized leaking I'm sure it's coming.
You can debate all day whether people from certain parts of the world should be admitted to a Western nation, but almost all the Western nations are well below population replacement birthrates.
So how about taking steps to increase the birthrate instead of replacing the population? Replace Germans with Syrians, you don't get more Germans. You get Syria in Germany.
Exactly. I recall maybe during the pilot episode Harry was unsure about whether to call Janeway "sir" or "ma'am" and she said "ma'am" and that was about it. Other than that no one noticed she was a woman. There were Maquis crew members who didn't want to follow a starfleet captain, but nobody ever had a problem with her because "her der girls can't starship!" Only the Kazon and they were basically space muslims. But the humans/federation were always post-racial, post-gender.
And this is what pisses me off about the modern sci-fi fandom gender wars. They make a crappy movie like Ghostbusters 2016, and when it looks crappy fans say "oh this looks crappy" and then the marketing department starts screaming about how it's only evil basement dwelling nerds who can't handle girl ghostbusters! Um, we basement dwelling nerds have been cheering movies and TV shows with women and minority leads for 40 years or more. Alien(s), Voyager, DS9, etc etc. It ain't the nerds with the irrational hatred problem.
Which was a single episode, was an allegory for apartheid, and in the first season of TNG (the vast majority of which was crap) and no one liked it.
Just saying, Janeway's defining character traits were her curiosity and her hard-assed rigid adherence to rules and standards. But the way character writing has gone today half the time a female character's defining character trait is "woman."
Perfectly said.
Just to add, it's interesting that Star Trek was both post-racial and extremely racist at the same time. Yes, the humans didn't even notice they were different colors or genders. But every Klingon's a warrior, every Vulcan's a scientist or diplomat, ever Ferengi is a greedy weasel, etc. And sometimes the plot would center around the struggles of a character who didn't fit their racial stereotype.
It would be nice if they would make a new Star Trek series about exploration, discovery, science fiction, etc. By all means give us a post-racialism, post-feminist crew of diverse characters who don't even notice they're diverse. My fear is it's going to be Star Trek: Diversity Wars and the science fiction will be glossed over and every episode will be about how the strong independent wymynz what don't need no man character struggles against the institutionalized discrimination against strong independent wymynz what don't need no man etc etc.