Actually I don't give a fuck about any of this shit. I'm voting on policy: BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BEAT CHYNA BOMB ISIS. Trump could grab the pussy in the middle of 5th avenue and I'd still vote for him.
I just love how the left has turned into neo-puritans and then are the biggest hypocrites in the world about it. "How can you vote for that ebil Drumpf when he disrespects teh strong independent wymynz what don't need no man?! You must be moral like the pretty man on TV says I am voting Hillary who intimidated and silenced all her husband's rape victims!! She's the true champion of wymynz!!"
I'm against Hillary because she funds jihadi terror groups to overthrow stable governments getting hundreds of thousands of people murdered, leading to the creation of ISIS and all their atrocities, and creating the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize europe.
I'm voting for Trump because fuck illegal immigrants, fuck muslims, fuck wars for israel, fuck banks, fuck multinationals, fuck free trade and fuck you. I do not give a fuck about gold digger whores who got their pussies grabbed, by Donald Trump or Bill Clinton. That hypocritical bullshit's all on you.
The problem is they're really just propaganda and get cited as if they're authority.
Jeb Bush: "My name is Jeb Bush."
Politificat: "Pants on fire! His real name is John Ellis Bush."
When Snopes gets political they do the stawman thing. If you make Claim A, they'll restate your claim as B, which is similar to A but not actually A, then debunk B calling it "mostly false," and then at the end say "what's actually true is A..." But all the casual observer sees is that you're a liar making mostly false claims, even though your claim was entirely true.
So since we can't trust high-status men not to grab the pussy (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Tiger Woods, etc etc) and we can't trust women to stop it (whether they like it or not) the only solution then is chaperones, no? The sexual revolution appears to be a failure.
That's my point. Wikileaks only has what they're given, and people only complain about "one-sided leaks" when it's their side. The bias comes from the democrat fanboy, not from Wikileaks.
I applaud these women. The vast, vast majority of women, sexually assaulted on a fucking airplane full of people by a goddamn billionaire would have immediately screamed bloody murder and filed lawsuits resulting in multi-million dollar settlements. But no, these brave, strong independent wymynz stoically held their silence for 30 goddamn years to all release their stories on the same day 4 weeks before an election for God and cuntry. There's nothing at all fishy about this to anyone except those who hate strong independent wymynz what don't need no man.
Why bother? You have your leftist ideology and you do not care, at all, about facts, science, reality, criminal behavior, anything. There is nothing you won't excuse, and nothing will make you give up on Hillary Clinton. So why bother wasting my time? If you care about the criminal behavior, watch the video. It's all well-presented, and well documented and researched. Why on earth should I spend my time retyping for you what they already say in the video and in the book?
Slashdot Mirror
Why do you think some women let rich, powerful men grab them by the pussy?
Actually I don't give a fuck about any of this shit. I'm voting on policy: BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BEAT CHYNA BOMB ISIS. Trump could grab the pussy in the middle of 5th avenue and I'd still vote for him.
I just love how the left has turned into neo-puritans and then are the biggest hypocrites in the world about it. "How can you vote for that ebil Drumpf when he disrespects teh strong independent wymynz what don't need no man?! You must be moral like the pretty man on TV says I am voting Hillary who intimidated and silenced all her husband's rape victims!! She's the true champion of wymynz!!"
I'm against Hillary because she funds jihadi terror groups to overthrow stable governments getting hundreds of thousands of people murdered, leading to the creation of ISIS and all their atrocities, and creating the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize europe.
I'm voting for Trump because fuck illegal immigrants, fuck muslims, fuck wars for israel, fuck banks, fuck multinationals, fuck free trade and fuck you. I do not give a fuck about gold digger whores who got their pussies grabbed, by Donald Trump or Bill Clinton. That hypocritical bullshit's all on you.
Or men could just learn how to behave like men instead of insecure adolescents.
What was that South Park episode about Tiger Woods and everybody just can't seem to figure out why rich, powerful, high-status men seem to like hot young puss so much?
Also, are you going to lecture women about how they shouldn't like 50 Shades of Grey?
The problem is they're really just propaganda and get cited as if they're authority.
Jeb Bush: "My name is Jeb Bush."
Politificat: "Pants on fire! His real name is John Ellis Bush."
When Snopes gets political they do the stawman thing. If you make Claim A, they'll restate your claim as B, which is similar to A but not actually A, then debunk B calling it "mostly false," and then at the end say "what's actually true is A..." But all the casual observer sees is that you're a liar making mostly false claims, even though your claim was entirely true.
So since we can't trust high-status men not to grab the pussy (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Tiger Woods, etc etc) and we can't trust women to stop it (whether they like it or not) the only solution then is chaperones, no? The sexual revolution appears to be a failure.
That's my point. Wikileaks only has what they're given, and people only complain about "one-sided leaks" when it's their side. The bias comes from the democrat fanboy, not from Wikileaks.
Apparently women can't be trusted to deal with sexual interaction with men. The only solution is to bring back chaperones.
But who rhetoricizes the rhetoricizers?
But what about 6 minute abs?
I applaud these women. The vast, vast majority of women, sexually assaulted on a fucking airplane full of people by a goddamn billionaire would have immediately screamed bloody murder and filed lawsuits resulting in multi-million dollar settlements. But no, these brave, strong independent wymynz stoically held their silence for 30 goddamn years to all release their stories on the same day 4 weeks before an election for God and cuntry. There's nothing at all fishy about this to anyone except those who hate strong independent wymynz what don't need no man.
But who fact checks the fact checkers?
Reality has a fascist bias.
Bill Cosby?
I justed found out there's an election. Did I miss anything good?
More like KEN BONED amiright?!!
If only Wikileaks had something on Trump so we could find out what he really thinks about women.
Did you feel that way when Wikileaks was putting out U.S. military secrets, but not the military secrets of Al Qaeda, or China?
Why bother? You have your leftist ideology and you do not care, at all, about facts, science, reality, criminal behavior, anything. There is nothing you won't excuse, and nothing will make you give up on Hillary Clinton. So why bother wasting my time? If you care about the criminal behavior, watch the video. It's all well-presented, and well documented and researched. Why on earth should I spend my time retyping for you what they already say in the video and in the book?
Am I winning?
Guess Hildawg's got it so in the bag you guys don't even need to show up to vote!
Women's suffrage was a mistake.
It's not about stupid, it's about perception. Women seem to have a much more difficult time perceiving threats than men.
Would the government lie to you? I'm sure the evidence for the Russian hacking is every bit as rock-solid as the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Universal suffrage was a mistake.
Well it looks like Hildawg's got it so in the bag you don't even need to show up to vote!