I don't think you understand what the polls are or how they work. But hey, great, Hildawg's got it so in the bag you don't even need to bother to show up to vote!
Yes, there's been an entire book written about it called "Clinton Cash," and a movie if you prefer that. It's only about an hour long. There are many, many cases.
By every metrics (rally attendance, social media shares, etc) Trump is winning, except in some widely touted polls of questionable methodology and origin. For instance yesterday the big story was the NBC Hillary +11 poll paid for by one of Hillary's super PACs that sampled 500 people with demographics that beat Obama's turnout of Dems by 10 points. What kind of idiot believes this?
1. An awful lot of the stuff Trump wants to do is already within the powers of the executive branch of government. For instance, telling ICE to deport illegals instead of ignoring the problem is a day 1 deal. Same with triggering provisions of our trade deals to cause re-evaluations, like declaring China a currency manipulator.
2. Trump is leading a populist movement. If he introduces legislation to fix the H1-B visa program, expect him to call on his supporters to flood their representatives with demands they pass it. When there are extremely few citizens who would oppose such a thing, the only opposition you'll see will be from lobbyists, and that's very bad optics for Congress.
That's interesting, but I fail to see the difference between that and white nationalism. They even have the "secure the future for white children" thing. He goes an awful lot into genetic heritage, which might be workable for European nations, but silly for the US. The US can't be a nation with a shared genetic lineage without genocide or population displacement on a scale that would make Hitler blush. And this certainly isn't anything like Trump's policies, or attitude.
It's also dated august 2016. This looks to me like the kind of thing where a "movement" happens, and then someone tries to cash in by coming out as a leader for it and steering it some way or another. Or just LARPers, who want a governmental system that is unattainable like Anarcho-Capitalism or something so they can sit around and talk about how much better things would be if everyone magically adopted their system, which will never happen.
We'll see, but I doubt it. I don't think you understand how Trump voters think. They're literally voting on the issues: BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BEAT CHYNA BOMB ISIS. That's it. They've known he's a womanizer since forever, so this didn't change anything about the reasons they're voting for Trump so while it's a crude statement that makes you cringe, it didn't change any of his broad policies. Nobody was voting for Trump to be a champion of women's rights (except in so far as stopping mexican rapists and muslim oppression of women). For the neocons they were always against Trump because he's not in the pocket of Club for Growth, the Chamber of Commerce, Goldman Sachs, etc, like they are, so the whole pussy grabbing thing is just an excuse to shill for their girl Hildawg.
Thank God the election's almost here. The media and the shilling are off the charts. I can't wait for everybody to vote and we can just be done with it and move on.
What are Trump's actual statements on H1-Bs, then? The out of context quote I was responding to was about immigration for people who come here on student visas and are then forced to leave. That seems kind of dumb to educate people at our universities and then send them home.
Do you have anything Trump has said about H1-Bs, specifically, that's different from what's been on his website since he released his immigration plan last year?
Uh, I'll do my best. You seem to be assuming I know things about you I don't.
Trump believes that trans women have authentic identities and you clearly do not. You won't have any MRI evidence I could post showing that yep, it's how folks are born, physically so that's a moot point. Trump seems to be all for gender equality outside of overhyped locker room banter. We've got Thiel and Milo over there as well. There's clearly something going on here I'm missing.
Here's the question: how much do I have to worry about President Trump signing legislation and using executive orders to enforce your backwards understanding of gender and sexuality? Will I wish I had voted for Clinton^H^H^H^H^H^H^HFEMA concentration camps and Nuclear Armageddon 2016?
I don't care about your delusions, but I do know Trump doesn't give a shit about tranny crap if that's what you're asking. Ted Cruz wants to ban men in dresses from the girl's bathroom, and the Democrats want to mandate that no one can ban men in dresses from the girl's bathroom. As far as I can tell, for Trump, this is not an issue for government. I agree. We've been getting along fine with people making their own bathroom decisions for thousands of years and civilization hasn't collapsed. My guess is that he would ignore the issue completely, and if anyone brought it up he would say something like "Jesus Christ, who the hell cares?! We've got ISIS cutting people's heads off and you want to argue about bathrooms?!"
Oh, and any chance you think, despite everything I've read that the alt-right views ending the drug war, closing the DEA, and massively shrinking the size of government and the prison-industrial complex as some kind of politically correct nonsense, that Trump would also support ending the drug war? (I heaven't really heard much of anything on that front and time's coming and gotta make a choice!)
I don't think the alt right-exists. Who are the thought leaders of the alt-right, and is there some website I can read what their ideology is from an actual alt-righter? You mentioned Milo...it's not him, he's a libertarian (and mostly just a contrarian troll. Funny guy though) who wrote an article about the alt-right, which isn't much better than Hillary Clinton describing it. But I've never heard anyone unironically say "I'm with the alt-right, and here are our beliefs." It's like when you go on a lefty place like/r/AskReddit and ask "Redditors who are against gay marriage, what are your arguments?" you get 1000 comments that start with "Well, I'm all for gay marriage, but I believe their arguments are..." because there's nobody on reddit who's actually against gay marriage to tell you their shit. Even go to/pol/ on 4chan and they say alt-right is a meme. I think it just started with those trolls who convinced the Daily Beast reporter that they were "prominent white nationalists" and Pepe the Frog was a Nazi. Hillary just described it as all racist sexist islamophobic xenophobic nazis, but that's how the left describes anyone who doesn't have a D after their name anyway. So, what's the difference between the alt-right and Nazis? If there's no difference, then just say Nazis. What's the difference between alt-right and white nationalists? If there's no difference, just say "white nationalists." I'm a (paleo)conservative (we used to just be called "conservatives" before the neocons rebranded themselves as the True Conservatives). Is alt-right paleocons? Then just say paleocon. Anyway, I don't think it exists, but if you've got some better information I'd love to hear it.
To answer your question, Trump thinks that the states should handle marijuana. It's not really part of his platform as he focuses on jobs, trade, terror, but when asked that's what he says. I think he should talk about it a little more because it'll appeal to the DUDE WEED LMAO hippies. Harder drugs he still thinks should be criminalized, and we have a heroin epidemic in the U
Trump's clarification of that question. Why you gotta lie and make it seem like he was talking about H1-Bs? This is why Trump is winning. All his opponents can do is be OUTRAGED but can't argue the issues without lying about his positions. People notice and then they hate you and support Trump. Making your own monsters, kid.
"Megyn Kelly asked about highly-skilled immigration. The H-1B program is neither high-skilled nor immigration: these are temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay. I remain totally committed to eliminating rampant, widespread H-1B abuse and ending outrageous practices such as those that occurred at Disney in Florida when Americans were forced to train their foreign replacements. I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions."
Who cares that Hillary armed the moderate beheaders in Syria for the sole purpose of making Israel comfortable with a nuclear Iran, knowing full well doing so would unite jihadi forces to create something exactly like ISIS leading to 400k war dead, the crimes against humanity committed by ISIS, the terrorist attacks committed in their name in Paris, Nice, Orlando, San Bernardino and other places, the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize all of western Europe, by running weapons through Benghazi that led to the death of our ambassador and the weapons falling in the hands of jihadis in Afghanistan, all that matters is who was grabbing the pussy.
Put her case(s) in front of a grand jury and let them decide. The email server is certainly an issue but more importantly there's a clear pattern of behavior of corruption and bribery. Over and over again nations and corporations had business in front of the State Department, and suddenly those nations and corporations that never had any interest in hearing Bill Clinton speak before wanted to pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars to speak. Several times his previous speaking fees. And then their business was decided in their favor and they never hit up ol' Bill again.
That's plenty enough to indict and convict. That's how bribery cases work. You rarely have a smoking gun of "I will give you this cash and you will do this thing." You show a pattern of people getting pulled over by the cop, let out of a $100 ticket, who then immediately pull over to his daughter's girl scout cookie stand and buy $50 worth of cookies.
You can indict a ham sandwich. Why don't they indict Hillary?
But the public announcements came from people who already failed at changing minds. These people were always against Trump. If people cared what Paul Ryan thought, Trump would have never been the nominee. Those Republicans turned more people against them than against Trump, and further exposed what those of who've been paying attention have known for years: there is no two party system, just a uniparty with common economic interests. Paul Ryan would rather have Hillary as president because the same people own both of them.
That's perjury, yes. But a court not noticing perjury isn't "criminally negligent" on the part of the court.
If someone tried to do what you suggested, Microsoft would complain and there would be criminal and civil penalties for the plaintiff/"defendant" in your script. But nothing bad would happen to the judge...he didn't do anything wrong. What do you think would or should happen to the judge?
No. We have an adversarial court system, not an inquisitorial system. The job of the civil court is to settle disputes, not find truth. The dispute is settled, the court did its job. It's not the court's job to determine if the dispute was real or not.
Depends on how you weight human and economic costs. There's also the issue of the uncontrolled border being a conduit for drugs, guns, and sex trafficking. So here are the problems with illegal immigration across the Mexican border (there's also illegal immigration from overstayed visas, but that doesn't have anything to do with guns and drugs):
1. Illegal immigrants are exploited by US businesses for cheap labor. They are denied the protections of our labor laws, and the threat of deportation keeps them compliant. It's slavery with extra steps.
2. Some illegal immigrants commit crimes against American citizens. If the government were doing its job and enforcing the border, this wouldn't happen, and people like Jamiel Shaw's son would still be alive. This mostly effects poor and minority citizens who cannot afford to move out of the cheap neighborhoods when the illegals move in. And the Mexican gangs are essentially ethnically cleansing black neighborhoods. These days Compton is 60% latino. There's other political groups that want this ignored, like La Raza and the Aztlan Reconquista.
3. 80% of Central American women and girls are raped during their illegal border crossing. If the border were controlled they would either stay home and not be raped, or would be entering legally with a work visa and be protected by border patrol officials and not raped.
4. The black market in the US for drugs (and Mexico for guns) enriches monsters like the Zetas. These people are the closet thing to devils on earth. They skin people alive and cut off their heads and hands. Stopping or slowing the flow of contraband across the border would starve them of the money they need to operate.
5. The US is suffering from a heroin epidemic, and that heroin is coming from Mexico. Yes, it would be great to treat addiction as a medical problem, but that's an awful lot easier when you can't buy heroin for $10 on any street corner in New Hampshire.
6. The cost to the taxpayer of services for illegal immigrants is over $110 billion each year, which makes a wall and border enforcement a much cheaper option.
7. For some reason, immigrants don't seem to care much about limited constitutional government and individual liberty. They often times come from authoritarian cultures and vote for whoever promises to give them the most stuff. This makes severe demographic shift an existential problem for the Republic. Mass immigration is a war against the middle class by the plutocrats using the poor immigrants as pawns. If eventually everyone is voting on racial lines instead of ideological lines then our future is Brazil. Corrupt banana republic.
But hey, we get cheap tomatoes, and nobody calls you racist, so all the blood, exploitation, rape, and death of liberty is worth it, right?
I don't think you've been paying attention. There's been a long feud between Trump and Ryan. "Omnibus" Ryan is the poster boy for the neocon establishment, and the exact kind of person Trump voters are sick of and want to boot out. He's basically a democrat, he's married to a democrat, and he's from Wisconsin which is very progressive. Ryan withheld his endorsement of Trump for a very long time (as Trump did with Ryan), and even then basically endorsed "the party's nominee" because he had to. The entire point of the Trump movement is an insurgency against the Paul Ryan types. When Mitt Romney gave his "anyone but Trump" speech, Trump's support went up.
And Guiliani gave a fiery speech last night at the opening of Trump's rally. He doesn't defend Trump's comments, but he absolutely supports Trump.
The "rape babies" part was facetious. But yes, the democrats don't want to do anything about immigration legal or otherwise because ~70% of immigrants vote Democrat. It's cultural...both major Mexican parties are socialist. The Republicans don't do anything about it because their donors like the cheap labor.
Ask a democrat how excited they are that demographic changes will eventually give them a permanent majority. They're thrilled. Fuck whitey. They did it on purpose...see the Immigration Act of 1965. Tell a non-Trump Republican we should deport the illegals and they'll ask "but who'll pick the tomatoes?" It doesn't take a conspiracy when it's already in the interests of all the political ideologues and the owner class.
They got drunk and decided to test out their interdimensional transportation device and then the green ooze from the other dimension planet caused them. And the producers said "holy shit this movie sucks!" and rushed out an ending in 2 days and released it.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think you understand what the polls are or how they work. But hey, great, Hildawg's got it so in the bag you don't even need to bother to show up to vote!
Do you understand what the polls are and how their methodology works?
Yes, there's been an entire book written about it called "Clinton Cash," and a movie if you prefer that. It's only about an hour long. There are many, many cases.
By every metrics (rally attendance, social media shares, etc) Trump is winning, except in some widely touted polls of questionable methodology and origin. For instance yesterday the big story was the NBC Hillary +11 poll paid for by one of Hillary's super PACs that sampled 500 people with demographics that beat Obama's turnout of Dems by 10 points. What kind of idiot believes this?
1. An awful lot of the stuff Trump wants to do is already within the powers of the executive branch of government. For instance, telling ICE to deport illegals instead of ignoring the problem is a day 1 deal. Same with triggering provisions of our trade deals to cause re-evaluations, like declaring China a currency manipulator.
2. Trump is leading a populist movement. If he introduces legislation to fix the H1-B visa program, expect him to call on his supporters to flood their representatives with demands they pass it. When there are extremely few citizens who would oppose such a thing, the only opposition you'll see will be from lobbyists, and that's very bad optics for Congress.
That's interesting, but I fail to see the difference between that and white nationalism. They even have the "secure the future for white children" thing. He goes an awful lot into genetic heritage, which might be workable for European nations, but silly for the US. The US can't be a nation with a shared genetic lineage without genocide or population displacement on a scale that would make Hitler blush. And this certainly isn't anything like Trump's policies, or attitude.
It's also dated august 2016. This looks to me like the kind of thing where a "movement" happens, and then someone tries to cash in by coming out as a leader for it and steering it some way or another. Or just LARPers, who want a governmental system that is unattainable like Anarcho-Capitalism or something so they can sit around and talk about how much better things would be if everyone magically adopted their system, which will never happen.
We'll see, but I doubt it. I don't think you understand how Trump voters think. They're literally voting on the issues: BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BEAT CHYNA BOMB ISIS. That's it. They've known he's a womanizer since forever, so this didn't change anything about the reasons they're voting for Trump so while it's a crude statement that makes you cringe, it didn't change any of his broad policies. Nobody was voting for Trump to be a champion of women's rights (except in so far as stopping mexican rapists and muslim oppression of women). For the neocons they were always against Trump because he's not in the pocket of Club for Growth, the Chamber of Commerce, Goldman Sachs, etc, like they are, so the whole pussy grabbing thing is just an excuse to shill for their girl Hildawg.
Thank God the election's almost here. The media and the shilling are off the charts. I can't wait for everybody to vote and we can just be done with it and move on.
What are Trump's actual statements on H1-Bs, then? The out of context quote I was responding to was about immigration for people who come here on student visas and are then forced to leave. That seems kind of dumb to educate people at our universities and then send them home.
Do you have anything Trump has said about H1-Bs, specifically, that's different from what's been on his website since he released his immigration plan last year?
What's Hildawg's H1-B policy?
Uh, I'll do my best. You seem to be assuming I know things about you I don't.
Trump believes that trans women have authentic identities and you clearly do not. You won't have any MRI evidence I could post showing that yep, it's how folks are born, physically so that's a moot point. Trump seems to be all for gender equality outside of overhyped locker room banter. We've got Thiel and Milo over there as well. There's clearly something going on here I'm missing.
Here's the question: how much do I have to worry about President Trump signing legislation and using executive orders to enforce your backwards understanding of gender and sexuality? Will I wish I had voted for Clinton^H^H^H^H^H^H^HFEMA concentration camps and Nuclear Armageddon 2016?
I don't care about your delusions, but I do know Trump doesn't give a shit about tranny crap if that's what you're asking. Ted Cruz wants to ban men in dresses from the girl's bathroom, and the Democrats want to mandate that no one can ban men in dresses from the girl's bathroom. As far as I can tell, for Trump, this is not an issue for government. I agree. We've been getting along fine with people making their own bathroom decisions for thousands of years and civilization hasn't collapsed. My guess is that he would ignore the issue completely, and if anyone brought it up he would say something like "Jesus Christ, who the hell cares?! We've got ISIS cutting people's heads off and you want to argue about bathrooms?!"
Oh, and any chance you think, despite everything I've read that the alt-right views ending the drug war, closing the DEA, and massively shrinking the size of government and the prison-industrial complex as some kind of politically correct nonsense, that Trump would also support ending the drug war? (I heaven't really heard much of anything on that front and time's coming and gotta make a choice!)
I don't think the alt right-exists. Who are the thought leaders of the alt-right, and is there some website I can read what their ideology is from an actual alt-righter? You mentioned Milo...it's not him, he's a libertarian (and mostly just a contrarian troll. Funny guy though) who wrote an article about the alt-right, which isn't much better than Hillary Clinton describing it. But I've never heard anyone unironically say "I'm with the alt-right, and here are our beliefs." It's like when you go on a lefty place like /r/AskReddit and ask "Redditors who are against gay marriage, what are your arguments?" you get 1000 comments that start with "Well, I'm all for gay marriage, but I believe their arguments are..." because there's nobody on reddit who's actually against gay marriage to tell you their shit. Even go to /pol/ on 4chan and they say alt-right is a meme. I think it just started with those trolls who convinced the Daily Beast reporter that they were "prominent white nationalists" and Pepe the Frog was a Nazi. Hillary just described it as all racist sexist islamophobic xenophobic nazis, but that's how the left describes anyone who doesn't have a D after their name anyway. So, what's the difference between the alt-right and Nazis? If there's no difference, then just say Nazis. What's the difference between alt-right and white nationalists? If there's no difference, just say "white nationalists." I'm a (paleo)conservative (we used to just be called "conservatives" before the neocons rebranded themselves as the True Conservatives). Is alt-right paleocons? Then just say paleocon. Anyway, I don't think it exists, but if you've got some better information I'd love to hear it.
To answer your question, Trump thinks that the states should handle marijuana. It's not really part of his platform as he focuses on jobs, trade, terror, but when asked that's what he says. I think he should talk about it a little more because it'll appeal to the DUDE WEED LMAO hippies. Harder drugs he still thinks should be criminalized, and we have a heroin epidemic in the U
Trump's clarification of that question. Why you gotta lie and make it seem like he was talking about H1-Bs? This is why Trump is winning. All his opponents can do is be OUTRAGED but can't argue the issues without lying about his positions. People notice and then they hate you and support Trump. Making your own monsters, kid.
"Megyn Kelly asked about highly-skilled immigration. The H-1B program is neither high-skilled nor immigration: these are temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay. I remain totally committed to eliminating rampant, widespread H-1B abuse and ending outrageous practices such as those that occurred at Disney in Florida when Americans were forced to train their foreign replacements. I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions."
Form letter printed and mailed by Raj in Mumbai.
Since when is war bad for business?
Who cares that Hillary armed the moderate beheaders in Syria for the sole purpose of making Israel comfortable with a nuclear Iran, knowing full well doing so would unite jihadi forces to create something exactly like ISIS leading to 400k war dead, the crimes against humanity committed by ISIS, the terrorist attacks committed in their name in Paris, Nice, Orlando, San Bernardino and other places, the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize all of western Europe, by running weapons through Benghazi that led to the death of our ambassador and the weapons falling in the hands of jihadis in Afghanistan, all that matters is who was grabbing the pussy.
Put her case(s) in front of a grand jury and let them decide. The email server is certainly an issue but more importantly there's a clear pattern of behavior of corruption and bribery. Over and over again nations and corporations had business in front of the State Department, and suddenly those nations and corporations that never had any interest in hearing Bill Clinton speak before wanted to pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars to speak. Several times his previous speaking fees. And then their business was decided in their favor and they never hit up ol' Bill again.
That's plenty enough to indict and convict. That's how bribery cases work. You rarely have a smoking gun of "I will give you this cash and you will do this thing." You show a pattern of people getting pulled over by the cop, let out of a $100 ticket, who then immediately pull over to his daughter's girl scout cookie stand and buy $50 worth of cookies.
You can indict a ham sandwich. Why don't they indict Hillary?
This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.
But the public announcements came from people who already failed at changing minds. These people were always against Trump. If people cared what Paul Ryan thought, Trump would have never been the nominee. Those Republicans turned more people against them than against Trump, and further exposed what those of who've been paying attention have known for years: there is no two party system, just a uniparty with common economic interests. Paul Ryan would rather have Hillary as president because the same people own both of them.
I said,
IT'S NOT THE COURT'S JOB TO DETERMINE IF THE DISPUTE WAS REAL OR NOT.
stupid lameness filter I know it's like yelling that's the joke.
That's perjury, yes. But a court not noticing perjury isn't "criminally negligent" on the part of the court.
If someone tried to do what you suggested, Microsoft would complain and there would be criminal and civil penalties for the plaintiff/"defendant" in your script. But nothing bad would happen to the judge...he didn't do anything wrong. What do you think would or should happen to the judge?
Bush unveils vision for moon and beyond - Jan 15 2004.
No. We have an adversarial court system, not an inquisitorial system. The job of the civil court is to settle disputes, not find truth. The dispute is settled, the court did its job. It's not the court's job to determine if the dispute was real or not.
Depends on how you weight human and economic costs. There's also the issue of the uncontrolled border being a conduit for drugs, guns, and sex trafficking. So here are the problems with illegal immigration across the Mexican border (there's also illegal immigration from overstayed visas, but that doesn't have anything to do with guns and drugs):
1. Illegal immigrants are exploited by US businesses for cheap labor. They are denied the protections of our labor laws, and the threat of deportation keeps them compliant. It's slavery with extra steps.
2. Some illegal immigrants commit crimes against American citizens. If the government were doing its job and enforcing the border, this wouldn't happen, and people like Jamiel Shaw's son would still be alive. This mostly effects poor and minority citizens who cannot afford to move out of the cheap neighborhoods when the illegals move in. And the Mexican gangs are essentially ethnically cleansing black neighborhoods. These days Compton is 60% latino. There's other political groups that want this ignored, like La Raza and the Aztlan Reconquista.
3. 80% of Central American women and girls are raped during their illegal border crossing. If the border were controlled they would either stay home and not be raped, or would be entering legally with a work visa and be protected by border patrol officials and not raped.
4. The black market in the US for drugs (and Mexico for guns) enriches monsters like the Zetas. These people are the closet thing to devils on earth. They skin people alive and cut off their heads and hands. Stopping or slowing the flow of contraband across the border would starve them of the money they need to operate.
5. The US is suffering from a heroin epidemic, and that heroin is coming from Mexico. Yes, it would be great to treat addiction as a medical problem, but that's an awful lot easier when you can't buy heroin for $10 on any street corner in New Hampshire.
6. The cost to the taxpayer of services for illegal immigrants is over $110 billion each year, which makes a wall and border enforcement a much cheaper option.
7. For some reason, immigrants don't seem to care much about limited constitutional government and individual liberty. They often times come from authoritarian cultures and vote for whoever promises to give them the most stuff. This makes severe demographic shift an existential problem for the Republic. Mass immigration is a war against the middle class by the plutocrats using the poor immigrants as pawns. If eventually everyone is voting on racial lines instead of ideological lines then our future is Brazil. Corrupt banana republic.
But hey, we get cheap tomatoes, and nobody calls you racist, so all the blood, exploitation, rape, and death of liberty is worth it, right?
I don't think you've been paying attention. There's been a long feud between Trump and Ryan. "Omnibus" Ryan is the poster boy for the neocon establishment, and the exact kind of person Trump voters are sick of and want to boot out. He's basically a democrat, he's married to a democrat, and he's from Wisconsin which is very progressive. Ryan withheld his endorsement of Trump for a very long time (as Trump did with Ryan), and even then basically endorsed "the party's nominee" because he had to. The entire point of the Trump movement is an insurgency against the Paul Ryan types. When Mitt Romney gave his "anyone but Trump" speech, Trump's support went up.
And Guiliani gave a fiery speech last night at the opening of Trump's rally. He doesn't defend Trump's comments, but he absolutely supports Trump.
The "rape babies" part was facetious. But yes, the democrats don't want to do anything about immigration legal or otherwise because ~70% of immigrants vote Democrat. It's cultural...both major Mexican parties are socialist. The Republicans don't do anything about it because their donors like the cheap labor.
Ask a democrat how excited they are that demographic changes will eventually give them a permanent majority. They're thrilled. Fuck whitey. They did it on purpose...see the Immigration Act of 1965. Tell a non-Trump Republican we should deport the illegals and they'll ask "but who'll pick the tomatoes?" It doesn't take a conspiracy when it's already in the interests of all the political ideologues and the owner class.
Yes, which is why the new wall will have seismic sensors to detect tunneling.
They got drunk and decided to test out their interdimensional transportation device and then the green ooze from the other dimension planet caused them. And the producers said "holy shit this movie sucks!" and rushed out an ending in 2 days and released it.