But with a password for example, you know where the servics is listening and therefore can attempt to exploit problems with the service that can be exploited without a password. This is like putting the password before the protocol is even accessed.
All services should be this way. Passwords entered after the service has been accessed in some way always gives a chance for exploitation. This only gives the oportunity to attempt to expoit the OS's basic network funcationality.
In earlier history, virually the only reason for engineering was for military purposes.
Military: Bronse processes Iron processes Steal processes Basic Physics Boats Radio Communication advances Planes Atomic Physics Rockets/Space vehicles Satalites Computers The Internet
That's not entirely correct. The O2 is a third of the mass. I'm not sure what relavence the % of Oxygen's mass is. The main point is that the mass doesn't matter if it is fuel/oxidizer mass. Typically you want -more- of it because it makes life so simple if you can have more powerful engines that consume it in large quantities. --You are both wrong. In a Liquid Hydrogen/Liquid Oxygen rocket, 8 times as much oxygen mass is needed compared to hydrogen mass.
4H + O2 => 2H2O...twice as many hydrogens as oxygen but Oxygen is 16 times more massive.
Rocket engines are -very- efficient, but of course they have to push their own oxidizer along. --I dont know how you define efficiency but in my aproximation having to lift 20x the payload mass because of extra fuel is an inefficency.
Vastly smaller requirements for what? O2 which is amazingly cheap? Why bother? --Going back to the previous point. Its not a matter of the price of oxygen, but the bulk that it causes to carry it. This results in hugely more complex lift vehical, which is... um... huge, and expensive.
You don't get very far up before you run out of oxygen to power a scramjet --In fact it cant operate at low altituteds because there is too much oxygen.
scramjet... weighs quite a bit itself. --Compared to fuel weight ???? Are you nutts ?
Wx doesnt have a (working) GUI GUI builder. When laying out an interface, writing it in code is just stupid. Therefore I use Qt because I have Qt builder which while not perfect, is very usable.
I think its pretty hard to separate the difference between the strength of the compiler and the strenght of the language. You could try with many compilers on the same language, but that still doesnt factor out maturity since the newer languages' compliers havent had the time to mature.
The 1991 gulf war was never legally declared over. Only a ceasfire was declared. On those grounds the war would not be considered illegal. That is why no one has said anything while the US, (including under Clinton) and UK have, for the past 12 years leading up to this second conflict, intermittantly bombed Iraq's air defense systems.
Do you believe that our economy could work without being profit driven? Dont complain about capatalism until you have lived in a communist country. Is it possible to over do capitalism, yes, but capitalism itself is not the problem. Capitalism is like sex: Necessary for continuation, but possible to be irresponsible with. It is part of human nature, and like sex, dening our need for it absoulutely is a futile and counterproductive struggle.
Im sick of hearing socalist fanatics speak of capitalism as if it were a disease the should be swept off the planet, just as Im sick of religious fanatics acting as if sex was a disease that should be swept off the planet.
I am inclined to agree with you, however I can think of a similar example that is already possible. Imagine using the Linux Kernel in an otherwise propriatary setup: i.e. propriatary shell, windowing system, compiler, browser, office sofware, database, media player, Instant messenger, email client.
This is all already possible. In fact, I believe that there are PDAs out there that do just that.
While this sounds like a good idea, and may well be, these types of projects tend to go way over budget, and tend to be mismanaged. Feelgood social projects are always nice in principal, but often the downsides and pitfalls are not fully explored.
I think its unfair to take pot shots at the USA, and villanize us. We have a different system than South Korea, its more of an economic ecosystem rather than an engineered environment. If their system works for them, then great.
I am doubtfull of how sucessfull it will be, but I admit that I do not know exactly what the economic environment is there, and nor am I an economist. I would guess however that neither do you have these credentials.
Economic practicality, I think, should over-ride socialist philosophy, because once you break the bank, there isnt any money left for social programs.
Finally, there are plenty of socialist countries, this simply isnt one of them. If you disagree with the economic system, then fine, but put forth thought out arguements rather than flamebate overstatement. I certainly am not impressed with your generic US bashing. There is good and bad in every system.
I have the same problem as you do. However when Im around only Americans, some people seem to think I still speak with an accent, though they cannot place from where.
Some girl even refused to believe I was from the USA, and demanded to know where I was really from despite the fact that the rest of the group could not hear an accent in my speech.
I have nothing against liberals, but as long as we are pointing to dictionary definitions one looking for a less flattering defintion might also have scrolled farther down the dictionary.com page and found this one:
6. Free to excess; regardless of law or moral restraint; licentious.
Slashdot Mirror
But with a password for example, you know where the servics is listening and therefore can attempt to exploit problems with the service that can be exploited without a password. This is like putting the password before the protocol is even accessed.
All services should be this way. Passwords entered after the service has been accessed in some way always gives a chance for exploitation. This only gives the oportunity to attempt to expoit the OS's basic network funcationality.
I though about this along time ago as a way of hiding a trojan. Of course I didnt patent it so no money for me : /
Hey, what about this guy ?
Oxygen has an atomic weight of 8, Hydrogen 1. Given there are two H per O, that should meen it is 4 times heavier.
Actually, Oxygen has an atomic number of 8, and and an atomic weight of 16. Therefore the original number of 8 times heavier is correct.
Ban Glass !
The greedy Glass manufacturing Corperations are out to ruin our envrionment !.
A few?
In earlier history, virually the only reason for engineering was for military purposes.
Military:
Bronse processes
Iron processes
Steal processes
Basic Physics
Boats
Radio Communication advances
Planes
Atomic Physics
Rockets/Space vehicles
Satalites
Computers
The Internet
Religion:
Architecture
Printing Press
Mathematics
That's not entirely correct. The O2 is a third of the mass.
...twice as many hydrogens as oxygen but
I'm not sure what relavence the % of Oxygen's mass is. The main point is that the mass doesn't matter if it is fuel/oxidizer mass. Typically you want -more- of it because it makes life so simple if you can have more powerful engines that consume it in large quantities.
--You are both wrong. In a Liquid Hydrogen/Liquid Oxygen rocket, 8 times as much oxygen mass is needed compared to hydrogen mass.
4H + O2 => 2H2O
Oxygen is 16 times more massive.
Rocket engines are -very- efficient, but of course they have to push their own oxidizer along.
--I dont know how you define efficiency but in my aproximation having to lift 20x the payload mass because of extra fuel is an inefficency.
Vastly smaller requirements for what? O2 which is amazingly cheap? Why bother?
--Going back to the previous point. Its not a matter of the price of oxygen, but the bulk that it causes to carry it. This results in hugely more complex lift vehical, which is... um... huge, and expensive.
You don't get very far up before you run out of oxygen to power a scramjet
--In fact it cant operate at low altituteds because there is too much oxygen.
scramjet... weighs quite a bit itself.
--Compared to fuel weight ???? Are you nutts ?
Sir, I dont think you understand this at all.
Wx doesnt have a (working) GUI GUI builder. When laying out an interface, writing it in code is just stupid. Therefore I use Qt because I have Qt builder which while not perfect, is very usable.
Way to feed the troll...
Jackass !
Yeah, and comon, what does everyone think the first space race was about ???
Im not concerned with growing my testicles. They are big enough thanks.
I think its pretty hard to separate the difference between the strength of the compiler and the strenght of the language. You could try with many compilers on the same language, but that still doesnt factor out maturity since the newer languages' compliers havent had the time to mature.
Wow.... according to this gcc C sucks : (
Im thinking the supply is down.
I ate my swans last year.
The 1991 gulf war was never legally declared over. Only a ceasfire was declared. On those grounds the war would not be considered illegal. That is why no one has said anything while the US, (including under Clinton) and UK have, for the past 12 years leading up to this second conflict, intermittantly bombed Iraq's air defense systems.
Its a..*sniff*... visious cycle....*sniff* :,(
I apologise for my knee jerk reaction. Upon re-reading your post, I realized that my response was overdrawn.
Sorry
Do you believe that our economy could work without being profit driven? Dont complain about capatalism until you have lived in a communist country. Is it possible to over do capitalism, yes, but capitalism itself is not the problem. Capitalism is like sex: Necessary for continuation, but possible to be irresponsible with. It is part of human nature, and like sex, dening our need for it absoulutely is a futile and counterproductive struggle.
Im sick of hearing socalist fanatics speak of capitalism as if it were a disease the should be swept off the planet, just as Im sick of religious fanatics acting as if sex was a disease that should be swept off the planet.
I am inclined to agree with you, however I can think of a similar example that is already possible.
Imagine using the Linux Kernel in an otherwise propriatary setup:
i.e. propriatary shell,
windowing system,
compiler,
browser,
office sofware,
database,
media player,
Instant messenger,
email client.
This is all already possible.
In fact, I believe that there are PDAs out there that do just that.
Im pretty sure the necessary "undoccumented features" are there intentionally to keep things from OS/2 (or wine) to comming into compatability.
People are stupid... its proven every couple seconds.
While this sounds like a good idea, and may well be, these types of projects tend to go way over budget, and tend to be mismanaged. Feelgood social projects are always nice in principal, but often the downsides and pitfalls are not fully explored.
I think its unfair to take pot shots at the USA, and villanize us. We have a different system than South Korea, its more of an economic ecosystem rather than an engineered environment. If their system works for them, then great.
I am doubtfull of how sucessfull it will be, but I admit that I do not know exactly what the economic environment is there, and nor am I an economist. I would guess however that neither do you have these credentials.
Economic practicality, I think, should over-ride socialist philosophy, because once you break the bank, there isnt any money left for social programs.
Finally, there are plenty of socialist countries, this simply isnt one of them. If you disagree with the economic system, then fine, but put forth thought out arguements rather than flamebate overstatement. I certainly am not impressed with your generic US bashing. There is good and bad in every system.
I have the same problem as you do. However when Im around only Americans, some people seem to think I still speak with an accent, though they cannot place from where.
Some girl even refused to believe I was from the USA, and demanded to know where I was really from despite the fact that the rest of the group could not hear an accent in my speech.
Damn it, dont mod this one up, mod my previous post up. This one is out of context.
I have nothing against liberals, but as long as we are pointing to dictionary definitions one looking for a less flattering defintion might also have scrolled farther down the dictionary.com page and found this one:
6. Free to excess; regardless of law or moral restraint; licentious.